Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6708283
-
Patent Number
6,708,283
-
Date Filed
Thursday, April 13, 200024 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, March 16, 200420 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 714 5
- 714 43
- 714 44
- 714 56
- 710 312
- 710 313
- 710 314
- 710 315
- 710 316
- 710 302
- 710 304
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
The inventive system essentially hides redundant paths to the peripheral devices from the operating system, by reporting a single “virtual” path to the peripheral busses over PCI bus 0. The virtual path includes at least a virtual peripheral bus controller and a virtual video controller. The system also tells the operating system that the real controllers are on another PCI bus on an opposite side of a PCI-to-PCI bridge connected also to PCI bus 0. An I/O system manager selects one of the actual paths, which may, but need not, be connected to PCI bus 0, to handle communications with the peripheral devices. The I/O system manager maintains the controllers on the unselected path in an off-line or standby mode, in case of a failure of one or more of the controllers on the selected path. If a failure occurs, the I/O system manager performs a fail-over operation to change the selection of controllers, and the peripheral devices continue to operate in the same manner on the peripheral busses. The operating system does not respond to the controller failure by declaring a system failure, however, because the operating system continues to look to the virtual path, with its virtual controllers, as a valid path to the peripheral devices. The system also allows hot swapping of PCI bridges, through FET isolation of the unselected controllers. The devices on the PCI bus and the peripheral busses may also be hot swapped through selective FET isolation.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to fault tolerant computer systems and, more particularly, to mechanisms for fault tolerant access to system-critical devices on peripheral busses.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Fault-tolerant computer systems are employed in situations and environments that demand high reliability and minimal downtime. Such computer systems may be employed in the tracking of financial markets, the control and routing of telecommunications and in other mission-critical functions such as air traffic control.
A common technique for incorporating fault-tolerance into a computer system is to provide a degree of redundancy to various components. In other words, important components are often paired with one or more backup components of the same type. As such, two or more components may operate in a so-called lockstep mode in which each component performs the same task at the same time, while only one is typically called upon for delivery of information. Where data collisions, race conditions and other complications may limit the use of lockstep architecture, redundant components may be employed in a failover mode. In failover mode, one component is selected as a primary component that operates under normal circumstances. If a failure in the primary component is detected, then the primary component is bypassed and the secondary (or tertiary) redundant component is brought on line. A variety of initialization and switchover techniques are employed to make a transition from one component to another during runtime of the computer system. A primary goal of these techniques is to minimize downtime and corresponding loss of function and/or data.
Fault-tolerant computer systems are often costly to implement since many commercially available components are not specifically designed for use in redundant systems. It is desirable to adapt conventional components and their built-in architecture whenever possible.
To reduce downtime, fault tolerant systems are designed to include redundancy for connections and operations that would otherwise be single points of failure for the system. Accordingly, the fault tolerant system may include redundant CPUs and storage devices. Certain devices on peripheral busses may also be single points of failure for the system. In a system that uses a Windows operating system, for example, the loss of a controller for peripheral busses and/or a video controller results in a system failure.
Devices such as a keyboard, mouse, monitor, floppy drives, CD ROM drives, and so forth typically communicate with a system I/O bus, such as a PCI bus, over a variety of peripheral busses such as a USB and an ISA/IDE bus. The various peripheral busses connect to the PCI bus through a peripheral bus controller, such as an Intel PCI to ISA/IDE Xcelarator. The windows operating systems require that the peripheral bus controller plug into location
0
on the system PCI bus, or what is commonly referred to as “PCI bus
0
.”
A PCI-to-PCI bridge may be used to provide additional slots on a PCI bus. A bridge for use with the PCI bus
0
, for example, provides slots for the system-critical peripheral bus controller and video controller, and various other devices. The PCI-to-PCI bridge is then a single point of failure, as is the peripheral bus controller and the video controller. While it is desirable to provide fault tolerance by including redundant paths to the peripheral devices, through redundant PCI-to-PCI bridges and associated peripheral bus controllers and video controllers, the operating system is not equipped to handle them. The operating system requires that all of the peripheral bus controllers connect to PCI bus
0
, and redundant controllers alone thus can not provide the desired, fully redundant paths to the peripheral devices. Accordingly, what is needed is a mechanism to achieve such redundancy within the confines of the commercially available operating systems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The inventive system essentially hides redundant paths to the peripheral devices from the operating system, by reporting a single “virtual” path to the peripheral busses over PCI bus
0
. The virtual path includes at least a virtual peripheral bus controller and a virtual video controller. The system also tells the operating system that the real controllers are on another PCI bus on an opposite side of a PCI-to-PCI bridge connected also to PCI bus
0
. An I/O system manager selects one of the actual paths, which may, but need not, be connected to PCI bus
0
, to handle communications with the peripheral devices.
The I/O system manager maintains the controllers on the unselected path in an off-line or standby mode, in case of a failure of one or more of the controllers on the selected path. If a failure occurs, the I/O system manager performs a fail-over operation to change the selection of controllers, as discussed in more detail below. The operating system does not respond to the controller failure by declaring a system failure, however, because the operating system continues to look to the virtual path, with its virtual controllers, as a valid path to the peripheral devices. Accordingly, the fail-over operation does not adversely affect the overall operations of the system.
As discussed in more detail below, the system also allows hot swapping of PCI bridges, and associated devices on the PCI bus and the peripheral busses.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention description below refers to the accompanying drawings, of which:
FIG. 1
is a high-level functional block diagram of a system constructed in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 2
is a more detailed functional block diagram of the system;
FIG. 3
is a more detailed functional block diagram of a front panel included in the system of
FIG. 2
;
FIG. 4
is a high-level functional block diagram of system configuration software layers;
FIG. 5
is a flow chart of the operations of a hardware abstraction layer of
FIG. 4
;
FIG. 6
depicts a view of the I/O subsystem of
FIG. 2
by a plug and play manager of
FIG. 4
;
FIG. 7
is a more detailed functional block diagram of an I/O board of
FIG. 2
;
FIG. 8
is a more detailed functional block diagram of an I/O board of
FIG. 2
;
FIG. 9
is a more detailed functional block diagram of a front panel of FIG.
3
.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF AN ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT
Referring to
FIG. 1
a fault tolerant computer system provides redundant communication paths between each central processing unit
12
and peripheral devices that are supported by or connected to a system front panel
36
. The communications paths include redundant system PCI busses
14
, redundant peripheral busses
34
and redundant PCI-to-peripheral bus connections, which are depicted in the drawing as blocks
25
. The CPUs
12
are redundant, and thus, the system is tolerant of faults in the CPUs
12
, the busses
14
and
34
and the bus-to-bus connections represented by the blocks
25
. We discuss the system hardware and system operations in more detail below.
Referring now to
FIG. 2
, each CPU
12
consists of one or more central processors
11
that reside on a CPU board
10
along with associated memory and registers
16
and a “north-side” PCI bridge interface processor
18
. The CPU
12
communicates over redundant PCI-to-PCI bridges
22
with an I/O subsystem
24
. The I/O subsystem includes redundant I/O boards
26
that provide connections to redundant peripheral busses
34
, which connect, in turn, to the various peripheral devices that are supported by or connected through the front panel
36
.
A given PCI-to-PCI bridge
22
includes the north-side PCI bridge interface processor
18
that connects to a north-side of the PCI bus
14
on an associated CPU board
10
, a bus
19
and a “south-side” PCI bridge interface processor
20
that connects to the south-side of the PCI bus
14
on an associated I/O board
26
. The north-side PCI bridge interface processor provides connections to two locations on the north side PCI bus
14
, namely, physical location
0
and location
1
, which are referred to hereinafter as PCI bus
0
and PCI bus
1
. The south-side PCI bridge interface processor
20
similarly connects to two locations on the south side PCI bus
14
and provides PCI slots
28
to connect at least a peripheral bus controller
30
and a video controller
32
to the PCI bus. In the exemplary system, there is also a slot
28
for an I/O system manager
31
that monitors and controls certain operations of I/O subsystem hardware. There may be additional PCI slots for SCSI devices (not shown), and so forth.
The peripheral bus controller
30
and video controller
32
provide the actual interconnection between the PCI bus
14
and one end of the peripheral busses
34
. The peripheral busses
34
connect at their other ends to storage devices such as a floppy drive
38
and a CD ROM drive
40
that are supported by the front panel
36
, and front-panel connectors
42
,
46
and
50
for a keyboard
44
, a mouse
48
and a monitor
52
, respectively. The peripheral busses
34
include standard peripheral busses, such as a USB for the keyboard and so forth, and/or one or more ISA/IDE busses for the drives. The front panel
36
may support multiple floppy drives
38
or CD ROM drives
40
and/or include additional connectors for devices such as modems, and so forth.
As depicted in
FIG. 3
, the front panel also contains switches
60
that connect on one side to the redundant peripheral busses
34
and on the other side to the floppy drive
38
, CD ROM drive
40
, and the connectors
42
,
46
and
50
. The switches
60
operate under the control of the I/O system manager
31
, to pass signals between the devices connected to or supported by the front panel
36
and a selected set of the peripheral busses
34
, as discussed in more detail below.
The system depicted in
FIGS. 1-3
provides fully redundant communications paths from each CPU
12
to the front panel
36
. Accordingly, the failure of any devices on the redundant paths should not, from a hardware point of view, cause the system to go down. As is known to those skilled in the art, any path to the peripheral devices should be designed to ensure signal integrity. Accordingly, the lengths of each of the paths in the current system should be minimized and, in this system, the redundant paths should be essentially the same length. Further, the impedance of the traces in each path should be carefully controlled.
Failures of the non-redundant peripheral devices that plug into the front panel, such as the keyboard or monitor, while perhaps inconvenient to the user, are not system-critical failures. These devices can readily be replaced by plugging in replacements. As discussed in more detail below with reference to
FIG. 9
, the front panel
36
is designed for hot swapping, such that the floppy and CD ROM drives and the connectors can also be replaced without having to bring the system down.
We discuss immediately below how the system operates with redundant paths to the peripheral devices, when the operating system requires that the peripheral bus controller and the video controller connect only to PCI bus
0
.
When the system boots-up, it configures the system hardware using a predetermined, or default, pairing of a CPU and a set of I/O subsystem components that are resident on a selected I/O board
26
. The default pairing also includes a default selection of the peripheral bus and video controllers
30
and
32
that are resident on the selected I/O board. If the default selections should fail to boot the system, the system selects another CPU and/or set of I/O subsystem components to use for the boot-up operation. If another set of I/O subsystem components is selected for the boot-up operations, the system also changes its selection of the peripheral bus and the video controllers to those on the selected board.
Referring now also to
FIGS. 4 and 5
, as part of the boot-up operations, a plug and play manager
70
calls on routines, or functions,
74
in a hardware abstraction layer
72
, or HAL, which is essentially an interface between the operating system and the system hardware. The plug and play manager requests that the HAL, using these functions
74
, enumerate the PCI bus
14
, and thereafter, the devices attached to the PCI bus.
To enumerate the PCI bus
14
(step
500
), the functions
74
send queries to the devices on the bus by location. The devices respond to the query by identifying themselves at least by type, that is, as peripheral bus controllers, video controllers and so forth. The functions
74
determine from the responses that there are redundant peripheral bus controllers
30
and video controllers
32
on PCI busses
0
and
1
. The functions
74
then essentially hide the redundant peripheral bus controllers and the redundant video controllers from the operating system by informing the plug and play manager that a “virtual” peripheral bus controller and a “virtual” video controller are on PCI bus
0
(step
502
). The functions
74
report the virtual system-critical controllers on PCI bus
0
even if only a single set of controllers
30
and
32
are included in the system. In this way, the addition of redundant controllers to the system at a later time does not alter the path to the peripheral devices from the view point of the operating system.
Referring also to
FIG. 6
, which depicts the devices, both real and virtual, as seen from the point of view of the plug and play manager, the functions
74
also inform the plug and play manager that the two PCI-to-PCI bridges
22
are on PCI bus
0
and that various other devices such as, for example, ethernet controllers and so forth are on the south side of each of the bridges
22
(step
504
). Further, the functions
74
list, as attached to the south side of each bridge
22
, the selected controllers
30
and
32
identified as “special” controllers, such as “stratus controllers,” so that the plug and play manager and/or the operating system will not interpret them to be the system-critical bus and video controllers (step
506
). As a final enumeration step, the functions
74
query the devices on the peripheral busses
34
and tell the plug and play manager that the various peripheral devices, such as the keyboard, mouse, monitor and so forth are attached to the appropriate virtual controllers (step
508
).
The plug and play manager
70
assigns appropriate device functions to the key board, the mouse, and so forth, and informs the operating system about the various peripheral devices that are attached to the virtual controllers. The operating system then, in a conventional manner, assigns appropriate device objects to the devices.
As part of the boot-up operations, the system also configures I/O address space for communications to and from the front-panel devices. The system sets up the I/O address space on the CPU side of the PCI-to-PCI bridges
22
, so that the space is accessible to all of the peripheral bus and video controllers. The I/O space is thus set up in the memory
16
on each CPU board.
At any given time, the system permits only one peripheral bus controller and one video controller to claim the I/O address space in the memory
16
. The system uses a peripheral bus configuration register
17
(
FIG. 2
) on the CPU board
10
, or at least one predetermined bit location in the register, to establish which controllers may claim the I/O address space in the memory
16
. The register bit is thus set to the appropriate value to select, as appropriate, the controllers connected to the PCI bus
0
at the CPUs or the controllers connected to the PCI bus
1
at the CPUs. The PCI bridge interface processor
18
responds to the state of the address space bit by passing information to and from the I/O address space and the selected controllers over the appropriate connections to PCI bus
0
or PCI bus
1
.
If one of the selected controllers
16
or
22
should later fail, the system performs a fail-over operation to change its controller selections. As part of the fail-over operation, the I/O system manager
31
disables the PCI bus interface processor
20
associated with the failed controller, and thus, the south sides of the associated PCI-to-PCI bridges
22
. The I/O system manager
31
on the south side of the other PCI-to-PCI bridges
22
is notified of the failure, and responds by changing the setting in the configuration registers
17
on each of the CPU boards
12
, to give the previously unselected controllers access to the I/O address space in the memory
16
. The I/O system manager
31
also changes the control setting of the switches
60
, such that the switches use the peripheral busses
34
associated with the newly selected set of controllers
30
and
32
.
The newly selected controllers
30
and
32
are either powered down or in standby mode at the time they are selected. Accordingly, the controllers must be configured to set the associated internal registers and memory to the appropriate states. The controller configuration may be performed in essentially the same manner as it is performed during a boot-up operation, and the internal registers and memory may be set to the default states. Alternatively, the I/O system manager
31
may periodically save the internal states of the selected controllers
30
and
31
, and use these states to configure the newly selected controllers. The I/O system manager must also handle the fail-over of the other controllers on the south side of the PCI bus in an appropriate manner.
The controller failure is reported to the plug and play manager
72
either by one of the I/O system managers
31
based on errors detected through system diagnostics, or by some other system component. The plug and play manager requests that the HAL functions
74
again enumerate the PCI bus
14
. In response, the functions provide to the plug and play manager the same information about the virtual controllers on PCI bus
0
, the attached PCI-to-PCI bridges, and so forth. The functions
74
also tell the plug and play manager that the special controllers
30
and
32
connected to the south side of one of the bridges
22
are no longer connected, and that other special controllers, that is, the previously non-selected controllers
30
and
32
, are now connected to the south side of the other bridge
22
. The plug and play manager determines that the reported change in the controller connections does not warrant the sending of an error message to the other system components, however, because the virtual controllers still provide the path to the peripheral devices.
The PCI-to-PCI bridge
22
associated with the failed controller is disabled in the exemplary system so that, as appropriate, the I/O board
26
and devices resident thereon can be replaced, or hot swapped, as discussed in more detail below. Alternatively, the faulty controller alone may be hot swapped while the associated bridge
22
is disabled.
As discussed above, the I/O system manager
31
may periodically save the internal states of the selected peripheral bus controller
30
and the video controller
32
. The system may also track the time between failures of the various controllers, or other statistics that allow the system essentially to predict controller failure. The system can then save the controller states, and change its selection of controllers at an appropriate time before a failure occurs.
We discuss below the hot plugging operations of the system. First, we discuss hot plugging an I/O board
26
. Then, we discuss hot plugging a device into a PCI slot
28
. Finally, we discuss hot plugging the front panel
36
and associated devices.
Referring now to
FIG. 7
, diagnostic routines performed by a system hardware manager
82
and/or error detection logic
83
, which are resident in whole or in part on a mother board
80
into which the I/O boards
26
plug, inform a system hot plug controller
84
and the I/O system manager
31
that a device resident on a particular I/O board, such as the peripheral bus controller
30
, has failed. The system hardware manager
82
and/or the error detection logic
83
may determine that the bus controller
30
has failed based on errors in the communications from the bus controller, such as the bus controller using an address with a parity error or the bus controller not starting a bus transaction within a predetermined time after being granted access to the bus, and so forth.
In response, the I/O system manager
31
asserts an I/O broken signal. The I/O manager then changes the controller selection for the peripheral busses, as discussed above, so that the board no longer receives signals from or directs signals to the peripheral devices. The hot plug controller
84
next electrically isolates the I/O board
26
and the various devices thereon from the PCI bus by disabling a switch, for example, FET
86
, through which power is supplied at least to the processor
20
. The faulty I/O board
26
can then be removed.
When the I/O board
26
is unplugged from the system an associated board present signal is de-asserted by a switch that is part of a back panel (not shown), which is opened to gain access to the board. The open back panel also opens a switch that cuts power to the board
26
. A new board is then plugged into the system and the back panel is closed. This again asserts the board present signal and provides power to the board. The I/O system manager
31
then asserts a reset signal as part of its boot-up operations. The I/O broken signal remains asserted, that is, it is still essentially held by the state of a bit in a status register on the CPUs. The I/O system manager then configures the new board
26
, that is, it sets the clock and logic levels on the new board in a conventional manner.
When the clock and logic levels are valid, the I/O system manager de-asserts the reset signal. A predetermined time thereafter the manager also de-asserts the I/O broken signal. By the time both signals are de-asserted, the new I/O board
26
is fully configured and operational, and the I/O system manager can then bring the board on-line by changing the board status to on-line at a time that allows the board to properly handle a next PCI bus transaction. Other register and memory information may be copied from the other I/O board
26
, as necessary. The insertion of the board in this manner does not disrupt the devices and/or transaction on the system PCI bus.
Referring now to
FIG. 8
, we discuss hot plugging a device into the PCI bus. As discussed above, the system hardware manager
82
or the error detection logic
83
detects the failure of a device
88
that is on the PCI bus. The I/O system manager
31
responds to the failure by asserting the I/O broken signal, also as discussed above. In the exemplary system, the system manager
31
may change the selection of controllers
30
and
32
if the failed device is, for example, the video controller
32
. Otherwise, the manager may leave the controller selection in place.
If the device is in a hot pluggable slot
28
, a hot plug controller
90
resident on the I/O board isolates the failed device
88
from the PCI bus
14
by turning off a signal FET
92
that resides in the slot
28
between the PCI bus
14
and the device
88
. The hot plug controller
80
then turns power off to the slot
28
through a power FET
94
, which powers down the device
88
that is plugged into the slot. At the same time the I/O system manager
31
changes the status of the slot
28
to off-line. The electrical isolation of the device
88
and later powering off of the PCI slot
28
does not adversely affect the operations of the other devices on the PCI bus
14
.
The isolated device
88
can now be removed from the powered-off slot
28
, and a new device can be hot plugged into the slot, without disrupting the other devices on the PCI bus. To remove the device, an ejector button
100
is activated. The button
100
controls a switch
102
that, in turn, controls a board present signal. The signal is de-asserted when the switch
102
is activated, to indicate that the slot
28
is empty.
When a new device
88
is plugged into the slot
28
the ejector button
100
is deactivated to close the switch
102
and the device present signal is again asserted. The hot plug controller
90
then applies power to the slot through the power FET
94
, and the device
88
boots, to establish its clock and logic levels. At the same time the I/O system manager
31
asserts a reset signal. After the clock and associated logic levels are established and guaranteed to be valid the I/O system manager
31
deasserts the reset signal. When the PCI bus is next idle, the hot plug controller
90
enables the signal FET
92
, to connect the device to the PCI bus. A predetermined time thereafter, the I/O system manager
30
de-asserts the I/O broken signal, and the device
88
goes on-line.
In the exemplary system, the connectors for the devices have power pins that are shorter than the signal pins and ground pins that are longer than the signal pins. Accordingly, as a device is removed from the slot, the power pins disconnect immediately and the ground pins are the last to disconnect, to prevent noise from disrupting the other devices on the board. Similarly, when a device is plugged into the system, the ground pins are the first to connect and the power pins the last to connect, to prevent damage to the device being inserted and to the other devices on the board.
Certain of the peripheral devices
18
, such as the CD ROM, floppy drive and so forth may be essentially part of the front panel
36
, along with the various connectors for the plug in devices such as, for example, the monitor and keyboard. Since these are noncritical devices, they are not duplicated in the system. When one of these front panel devices or connectors fails, the entire front panel in the exemplary system can be replaced without disrupting the system.
Referring now to
FIG. 9
, the front panel
36
electrically connects to system power through a power controller
62
and to the peripheral busses
34
through a front panel board
66
that includes the switches
60
. As discussed above, certain pins on the connectors between boards are shorter to provide last-to-make and first-to-break connections. For the connector
64
, the pins for two enable lines
65
and
63
are short. These pins connect to ground on a shield board (not shown), into which the front panel board
66
plugs to electrically connect the associated peripheral devices and/or connectors to the peripheral busses
34
and system power. When the front panel board is fully plugged into the shield board, the two enable lines are drawn to a desired low state to signal that the board is then present.
To ensure that the enable lines are not drawn to the desired state, which in the exemplary system is the low state, before the board
66
is fully inserted, pull-ups
68
are included on the lines in the switches
60
and power controller
62
. The pull-ups keep the lines
65
and
63
high until they are driven low by their connection to ground.
When the lines
65
and
63
are high, the switches
60
are disabled, and the IDE, USB and VGA busses are shut off. Accordingly, as soon as a user begins to remove the front panel board
66
, the busses are turned off by the switches
60
. In this way the bus signal pins and, in particular, the IDE signal pins, are protected from any power spikes that may occur as the board
66
powers down.
The enable lines
65
and
63
connect also to the power controller
62
. As the front panel board
66
is removed, the power controller turns off and powers down the board. The power ramps down, however, so that the switches
60
turn off before the power is fully off. This ensures that the switches
60
operate properly to protect the bus signal pins as the board is removed.
When the front panel is removed, the I/O system manager
31
notices the change and notifies the plug and play manager
72
. The plug and play manager requests a PCI bus enumeration, and the HAL functions
74
then tell the plug and play manager that certain peripheral devices are no longer connected, and the plug and play manager determines that the user should be notified.
Once the faulty devices and/or connectors are replaced, the front panel can be plugged back into the system. When the board is inserted, the two enable lines are drawn low and power is supplied to the front panel board
66
through the power controller
62
. The switches
60
are also enabled and provided power, such that they again connect the peripheral devices and connectors to the selected set of peripheral busses based on control signals supplied by the system manager. The plug and play manager is then told of the change to the I/O subsystem, and the change is reflected in adding the devices to the virtual controllers as part of PCI bus enumeration, and the system continues to operate.
Claims
- 1. A computer system including:A. one or more system components connected to a first bus; B. redundant sets of one or more controllers that connect to redundant second busses and allow communications between the first bus and the second busses; C. one or more functions for presenting to a computer operating system a communication path from the first bus to one of the second busses through a set of one or more virtual controllers, and D. an I/O subsystem manager for redirecting to a selected set of the one or more controllers the communications that are directed through the virtual controllers.
- 2. The computer system of claim 1 wherein the I/O subsystem manager changes the selection of the set of one or more controllers from a previously selected set when one or more of the controllers in the previously selected set fails.
- 3. The computer system of claim 2 wherein each second bus connects at one end to one set of one or more controllers and at a second end to one or more peripheral devices.
- 4. The computer system of claim 3 further including switches for connection to the second busses at ends associated with the peripheral devices, the switches being directed by the I/O subsystem manager to select the second bus associated with the selected set of controllers.
- 5. The computer system of claim 4 wherein the sets of one or more controllers include peripheral bus controllers, video controllers or both.
- 6. The computer system of claim 1 wherein the system components connect to redundant first busses.
- 7. The computer system of claim 6 wherein the system components are central processing units.
- 8. The computer system of claim 6 wherein the I/O system manager controls the selection of the set of one or more controllers for interconnecting the first busses and the second bus associated with the selected set of controllers.
- 9. The computer system of claim 8 wherein the I/O subsystem manager changes the selection of the set of one or more controllers from a previously selected set when one or more of the controllers in the previously selected set fails.
- 10. The computer system of claim 9 further including switches for connection to the second busses at ends associated with the peripheral devices, the switches being directed by the I/O subsystem manager to select the second bus associated with the selected set of controllers.
- 11. The computer system of claim 1 further comprisingE. a bridge electrically interconnecting separate portions of the first bus; F. one or more connection slots connecting to the first bus on one side of the bridge for providing plug-in connectors for connecting devices to the first bus; G. field effect transistors (FETS) connecting between the first bus and the devices plugged into the connection slots; and H. a hot plug controller for selectively controlling the FETS, to electrically isolate a selected device from the first PCI bus.
- 12. The computer system of claim 11 wherein the hot plug controller furtheri. resets the slot containing the isolated device, and ii. turns power off to the slot, to allow the device to be removed.
- 13. The computer system of claim 12 wherein the hot plug controller furtheriii. again resets the slot when a new device is plugged into the slot, iv. powers the slot to reset power to the device, and v. controls the FET to connect the device to the first bus.
- 14. The computer system of claim 13 further including an I/O system manager for controlling the hot plug of a board that is one side of the bridge, the controllera. setting an I/O broken signal to end communications over the bridge; b. resetting the devices on the board and turning power to the board off; c. de-asserting a board present signal when the board is removed from the system; d. asserting the board present signal when a new board is plugged into the system; e. asserting a reset signal and resetting clocks and logic levels on devices on the new board; f. deasserting the reset signal when the clocks and logic have reached stable levels; and g. deasserting the I/O broken signal a predetermined time after the reset signal is deasserted.
- 15. The computer system of claim 14 further includingE. a front panel that connects the peripheral devices to one end of peripheral busses which at a second end connect to one side of the bridge; F. FETs that control a connector between the front panel devices and the peripheral bus, the FETs controlling power to the front panel and the peripheral devices; and G. a handle for locking the front panel to the system and controlling the FETS, the handle in an open position disabling the FETs and unlocking the front panel to allow the removal of the front panel from the system, and in a closed position locking the front panel to the system and enabling the FETs to provide power to the front panel and the peripheral devices.
- 16. A method of operating a computer system including the steps of:A. presenting to a computer operating system a communication path from a first bus to a second bus through a set of one or more virtual controllers, and B. redirecting to a selected set of one or more controllers communications that are directed through the virtual controllers.
- 17. The method of claim 16 wherein the method further includes the step of changing the selection of the set of one or more controllers from a previously selected set when one or more of the controllers in the previously selected set fails.
- 18. The method of claim 17 wherein the sets of one or more controllers connect to redundant second busses.
- 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the second busses connect also to peripheral devices.
- 20. The method of claim 19 further including the step of selecting at the peripheral devices the second bus associated with the selected set of controllers.
- 21. The method of claim 20 wherein the sets of one or more controllers include peripheral bus controllers, video controllers or both.
US Referenced Citations (173)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
3544973 |
Borck, Jr. et al. |
Dec 1970 |
A |
3548176 |
Shutler |
Dec 1970 |
A |
3641505 |
Artz et al. |
Feb 1972 |
A |
3710324 |
Cohen et al. |
Jan 1973 |
A |
3736566 |
Anderson et al. |
May 1973 |
A |
3795901 |
Boehm et al. |
Mar 1974 |
A |
3805039 |
Stiffler |
Apr 1974 |
A |
3820079 |
Bergh et al. |
Jun 1974 |
A |
3840861 |
Amdahl et al. |
Oct 1974 |
A |
3997896 |
Cassarino, Jr. et al. |
Dec 1976 |
A |
4015246 |
Hopkins, Jr. et al. |
Mar 1977 |
A |
4032893 |
Moran |
Jun 1977 |
A |
4059736 |
Perucca et al. |
Nov 1977 |
A |
4128883 |
Duke et al. |
Dec 1978 |
A |
4228496 |
Katzman et al. |
Oct 1980 |
A |
4245344 |
Richter |
Jan 1981 |
A |
4263649 |
Lapp, Jr. |
Apr 1981 |
A |
4275440 |
Adams, Jr. et al. |
Jun 1981 |
A |
4309754 |
Dinwiddie, Jr. et al. |
Jan 1982 |
A |
4366535 |
Cedolin et al. |
Dec 1982 |
A |
4434463 |
Quinquis et al. |
Feb 1984 |
A |
4449182 |
Rubinson et al. |
May 1984 |
A |
4453215 |
Reid |
Jun 1984 |
A |
4467436 |
Chance et al. |
Aug 1984 |
A |
4484273 |
Stiffler et al. |
Nov 1984 |
A |
4486826 |
Wolff et al. |
Dec 1984 |
A |
4503496 |
Holzner et al. |
Mar 1985 |
A |
4543628 |
Pomfret |
Sep 1985 |
A |
4590554 |
Glazer et al. |
May 1986 |
A |
4597084 |
Dynneson et al. |
Jun 1986 |
A |
4608631 |
Stiffler et al. |
Aug 1986 |
A |
4628447 |
Cartret et al. |
Dec 1986 |
A |
4630193 |
Kris |
Dec 1986 |
A |
4633394 |
Georgiou et al. |
Dec 1986 |
A |
4654857 |
Samson et al. |
Mar 1987 |
A |
4669056 |
Waldecker et al. |
May 1987 |
A |
4669079 |
Blum |
May 1987 |
A |
4700292 |
Campanini |
Oct 1987 |
A |
4703420 |
Irwin |
Oct 1987 |
A |
4750177 |
Hendrie et al. |
Jun 1988 |
A |
4805091 |
Thiel et al. |
Feb 1989 |
A |
4809169 |
Sfarti et al. |
Feb 1989 |
A |
4816990 |
Williams |
Mar 1989 |
A |
4827409 |
Dickson |
May 1989 |
A |
4866604 |
Reid |
Sep 1989 |
A |
4869673 |
Kreinberg et al. |
Sep 1989 |
A |
4914580 |
Jensen et al. |
Apr 1990 |
A |
4916695 |
Ossfeldt |
Apr 1990 |
A |
4926315 |
Long et al. |
May 1990 |
A |
4931922 |
Baty et al. |
Jun 1990 |
A |
4939643 |
Long et al. |
Jul 1990 |
A |
4974144 |
Long et al. |
Nov 1990 |
A |
4974150 |
Long et al. |
Nov 1990 |
A |
4985830 |
Atac et al. |
Jan 1991 |
A |
4994960 |
Tuchler et al. |
Feb 1991 |
A |
5005174 |
Bruckert et al. |
Apr 1991 |
A |
5083258 |
Yamasaki |
Jan 1992 |
A |
5099485 |
Bruckert et al. |
Mar 1992 |
A |
5117486 |
Clark et al. |
May 1992 |
A |
5138257 |
Katsura |
Aug 1992 |
A |
5179663 |
Iimura |
Jan 1993 |
A |
5243704 |
Baty et al. |
Sep 1993 |
A |
5247522 |
Reiff |
Sep 1993 |
A |
5251303 |
Fogg, Jr. et al. |
Oct 1993 |
A |
5270699 |
Signaigo et al. |
Dec 1993 |
A |
5295258 |
Jewett et al. |
Mar 1994 |
A |
5313627 |
Amini et al. |
May 1994 |
A |
5317726 |
Horst |
May 1994 |
A |
5345566 |
Tanji et al. |
Sep 1994 |
A |
5428766 |
Seaman |
Jun 1995 |
A |
5463755 |
Dumarot et al. |
Oct 1995 |
A |
5465340 |
Creedon et al. |
Nov 1995 |
A |
5530302 |
Hamre et al. |
Jun 1996 |
A |
5537535 |
Maruyama et al. |
Jul 1996 |
A |
5546535 |
Stallmo et al. |
Aug 1996 |
A |
5550986 |
DuLac |
Aug 1996 |
A |
5555372 |
Tetreault et al. |
Sep 1996 |
A |
5572688 |
Sytwu |
Nov 1996 |
A |
5574865 |
Hashemi |
Nov 1996 |
A |
5584030 |
Husak et al. |
Dec 1996 |
A |
5600784 |
Bissett et al. |
Feb 1997 |
A |
5613162 |
Kabenjian |
Mar 1997 |
A |
5627965 |
Liddell et al. |
May 1997 |
A |
5630046 |
Loise |
May 1997 |
A |
5630056 |
Horvath et al. |
May 1997 |
A |
5636342 |
Jeffries |
Jun 1997 |
A |
5659681 |
Ojima |
Aug 1997 |
A |
5671443 |
Stauffer et al. |
Sep 1997 |
A |
5696905 |
Reimer et al. |
Dec 1997 |
A |
5701410 |
BeMent et al. |
Dec 1997 |
A |
5701457 |
Fujiwara |
Dec 1997 |
A |
5737601 |
Jain et al. |
Apr 1998 |
A |
5751955 |
Sonnier et al. |
May 1998 |
A |
5758065 |
Reams et al. |
May 1998 |
A |
5784576 |
Guthrie et al. |
Jul 1998 |
A |
5790397 |
Bissett et al. |
Aug 1998 |
A |
5790775 |
Marks et al. |
Aug 1998 |
A |
5809256 |
Najemy |
Sep 1998 |
A |
5809285 |
Hilland |
Sep 1998 |
A |
5812748 |
Ohran et al. |
Sep 1998 |
A |
5815647 |
Buckland et al. |
Sep 1998 |
A |
5828903 |
Sethuram et al. |
Oct 1998 |
A |
5838899 |
Leavitt et al. |
Nov 1998 |
A |
5838900 |
Horvath et al. |
Nov 1998 |
A |
5838993 |
Riley et al. |
Nov 1998 |
A |
5862145 |
Grossman et al. |
Jan 1999 |
A |
5870301 |
Yakushiji et al. |
Feb 1999 |
A |
5875308 |
Egan et al. |
Feb 1999 |
A |
5875351 |
Riley |
Feb 1999 |
A |
5881251 |
Fung et al. |
Mar 1999 |
A |
5884027 |
Garbus et al. |
Mar 1999 |
A |
5890003 |
Cutts, Jr. et al. |
Mar 1999 |
A |
5892928 |
Wallach et al. |
Apr 1999 |
A |
5894560 |
Carmichael et al. |
Apr 1999 |
A |
5903778 |
Chang |
May 1999 |
A |
5923840 |
Desnoyers et al. |
Jul 1999 |
A |
5928339 |
Nishikawa |
Jul 1999 |
A |
5944800 |
Mattheis et al. |
Aug 1999 |
A |
5953538 |
Duncan et al. |
Sep 1999 |
A |
5956474 |
Bissett et al. |
Sep 1999 |
A |
5956476 |
Ranson et al. |
Sep 1999 |
A |
5978866 |
Nain |
Nov 1999 |
A |
5982672 |
Moon et al. |
Nov 1999 |
A |
5983289 |
Ishikawa et al. |
Nov 1999 |
A |
5991844 |
Khosrowpour |
Nov 1999 |
A |
5991900 |
Garnett |
Nov 1999 |
A |
5996035 |
Allen et al. |
Nov 1999 |
A |
6000043 |
Abramson |
Dec 1999 |
A |
6009481 |
Mayer |
Dec 1999 |
A |
6009535 |
Halligan et al. |
Dec 1999 |
A |
6012119 |
Ninomiya et al. |
Jan 2000 |
A |
6012120 |
Duncan et al. |
Jan 2000 |
A |
6021456 |
Herdeg et al. |
Feb 2000 |
A |
6026458 |
Rasums |
Feb 2000 |
A |
6032201 |
Tillery, Jr. et al. |
Feb 2000 |
A |
6032266 |
Ichinohe et al. |
Feb 2000 |
A |
6032271 |
Goodrum et al. |
Feb 2000 |
A |
6041375 |
Bass et al. |
Mar 2000 |
A |
6047343 |
Olarig |
Apr 2000 |
A |
6049894 |
Gates |
Apr 2000 |
A |
6052795 |
Murotani et al. |
Apr 2000 |
A |
6055584 |
Bridges et al. |
Apr 2000 |
A |
6062480 |
Evoy |
May 2000 |
A |
6073196 |
Goodrum et al. |
Jun 2000 |
A |
6085333 |
DeKoning et al. |
Jul 2000 |
A |
6098137 |
Goodrum et al. |
Aug 2000 |
A |
6125417 |
Bailis et al. |
Sep 2000 |
A |
6128750 |
Espy et al. |
Oct 2000 |
A |
6134679 |
Liddell et al. |
Oct 2000 |
A |
6141769 |
Petivan et al. |
Oct 2000 |
A |
6145036 |
Barenys et al. |
Nov 2000 |
A |
6154802 |
Khosrowpour |
Nov 2000 |
A |
6173312 |
Atarashi et al. |
Jan 2001 |
B1 |
6185697 |
Shiraishi |
Feb 2001 |
B1 |
6202115 |
Khosrowpour |
Mar 2001 |
B1 |
6260159 |
Garnett et al. |
Jul 2001 |
B1 |
6321286 |
Goodrum et al. |
Nov 2001 |
B1 |
6324627 |
Kricheff et al. |
Nov 2001 |
B1 |
6338150 |
Johnson et al. |
Jan 2002 |
B1 |
6363448 |
Waller et al. |
Mar 2002 |
B1 |
6397345 |
Edmonds et al. |
May 2002 |
B1 |
6430636 |
Cranston et al. |
Aug 2002 |
B1 |
6430710 |
Moriyama et al. |
Aug 2002 |
B1 |
6449729 |
Sanders et al. |
Sep 2002 |
B1 |
6449731 |
Frey, Jr. |
Sep 2002 |
B1 |
6505311 |
Ichinohe et al. |
Jan 2003 |
B1 |
6519671 |
Kondou et al. |
Feb 2003 |
B1 |
6530043 |
Beardsley et al. |
Mar 2003 |
B1 |
6536000 |
Jackson et al. |
Mar 2003 |
B1 |
6550017 |
Moiin et al. |
Apr 2003 |
B1 |
6557121 |
McLaughlin et al. |
Apr 2003 |
B1 |
6563595 |
Galloway |
May 2003 |
B1 |
6564340 |
Odegard et al. |
May 2003 |
B1 |
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number |
Date |
Country |
0 299 700 |
Jul 1987 |
EP |
0 301 499 |
Feb 1989 |
EP |
0 428 330 |
May 1991 |
EP |
0 475 005 |
Nov 1995 |
EP |
0 293 860 |
Feb 1996 |
EP |
0772127 |
May 1997 |
EP |
0 390 567 |
Jun 1999 |
EP |
2 060 229 |
Apr 1981 |
GB |
WO 9724677 |
Jul 1997 |
WO |
WO 9821660 |
May 1998 |
WO |
WO 9959066 |
Nov 1999 |
WO |
WO9966410 |
Dec 1999 |
WO |