This invention is directed towards digital television, and more particularly towards a method for switching between two television channels where at least one of the channels is digital.
Channel switching between television channels as being received by a television receiver (such as a television, a set-top box, . . . ) usually takes a certain amount of time, typically between 1.5 and 2 seconds, depending on the signal strength and reception hardware/software. During this switch time the video is usually black (blanked) and the audio is silent.
In normal situations, where the viewer triggers the channel switch (e.g., by pressing channel up/down buttons on the remote control), this period of silence/blackness is no problem since it is expected by the viewer, and also because the television programs that are being switched between have no relation between each other (are independent). In such a situation it is still desirable, however, to reduce the switch time (which is defined here as the time between presentation of the last video/audio from one (source) channel and the presentation of the first video/audio from the channel that is switched to).
In situations where the channel switch is made autonomously by the television receiver, for example because the presentation of one program is temporarily continued on another channel it is more important that the switch time is as short as possible, since the switch disrupts the flow of the presentation and the viewer's experience since (s) he does not expect a switch to happen. An example of such a situation is described in the Visible World patent application “System and Method for Simultaneous Broadcast for Personalized Messages”, filed on Apr. 24, 2001 with application Ser. No. 09/841,465 and is incorporated herein by reference, which describes how to implement personalized messaging in a broadcast environment in a highly bandwidth efficient manner by using modular (slot-based) messages. In one embodiment, personalized messages are concentrated in one (or a few) dedicated digital streams, so that existing analog and digital television channels can “share” personalized messages by switching to and from these dedicated channels at the appropriate times. This leads to a highly bandwidth efficient system since the personalized messages are time-shared on one (or a few) channels.
The present invention describes methods for reducing the channel switch time from an analog or digital channel to a digital channel, and back.
Note that the related Visible World patent application “System and Method for Seamless Switching”, filed on Dec. 13, 2000 with application Ser. No. 09/735,983 and incorporated herein by reference, explains how to seamlessly switch between content elements (modules of personalized messages) within a digital stream. The present application discloses methods on how to seamless switch to such a digital stream from another analog or digital stream and back.
The present invention addresses issues around masking the switching from an analog or digital television channel (located at a certain frequency in the frequency spectrum) to another, digital, television channel (located at a different frequency in the frequency spectrum) and back. In normal television broadcasting, channel ‘zapping’ between two unrelated channels can take up to 2 seconds in time, while the TV set (or set top box, STB) is performing the channel switch.
The present invention includes general methods to reduce such switch time, as well as specific methods that can be employed in situations where there is a relation between the channels that are being switched between.
The general methods involve using audio/video data in digital audio/video decoder buffers at the moment the switch is being made to cover up at least the tuning and demodulating parts of the switch time.
The specific methods involve the preparation/conditioning of the digital target stream (that is being switched to) such that playout of its audio/video can start faster than in the general case, by exploiting how video is encoded.
An illustrative embodiment of the present invention is described that inserts a personalized message, such as a commercial, in a television program in a bandwidth efficient manner.
An illustrative embodiment of the present invention for a broadcast television receiver including a tuner for selecting one channel from multiple channels and an encoded media buffer for receiving digital encoded media from a channel selected by the tuner, includes a method of switching from a first digital channel to a second channel. The method includes inputting digital encoded media from the first digital channel selected by the tuner to the encoded media buffer, then halting input of digital encoded media from the first digital channel to the encoded media buffer, while continuing to output digital encoded media from the first digital channel from the encoded media buffer. This also includes switching the tuner to the second channel, and after a passage of time for the tuner to complete switching to the second channel, outputting the second channel from the tuner. If the second channel is a digital channel then outputting the second channel from the tuner includes commencing input of digital encoded media from the second channel to the encoded media buffer. If the second channel is an analog channel, then outputting the second channel from the tuner includes bypassing the encoded media buffer.
The present invention also includes situations wherein the passage of time for the tuner to complete switching to the second channel is a predetermined amount of time, and a quantity of digital encoded media in the encoded media buffer is maximized to cover a maximal amount of the predetermined amount of time. This minimizes the amount of time the viewer sees no media. The present invention also includes attenuating audio for the first channel before switching the tuner to the second channel, increasing audio volume for the second channel afterwards.
When the media is digital video, and the second digital channel is an MPEG encoded channel, an illustrative embodiment includes creating the second digital channel such that after switching the tuner to the second channel, upon commencing input of digital encoded video from the second digital channel to the encoded video buffer, the first input into the encoded video buffer is a complete MPEG closed Group of Pictures (GOP). This avoids the system needing to wait for a GOP (I-frame). Alternatively, digital video can be previously encoded such that a VBV-delay of a first video frame in presentation order is reduced. This may be accomplished by increasing the video bitrate, and/or reducing a VBV buffer size maximum value for an encoder.
Another illustrative embodiment includes sending at least one control message for the second channel to the broadcast television receiver at a time before switching (or completion of switching the tuner to the second channel. This avoids the system needing to wait for control messages to appear in the channel that has been switched to.
The present invention works whether the media is video, MPEG encoded video, audio, MPEG encoded audio, or AC-3 encoded audio. An illustrative embodiment of a broadcast television receiver (included full television set, set top box etc.) includes a tuner, to select one channel from multiple channels received by the receiver. It also includes a digital encoded media buffer coupled to the tuner; the digital encoded media buffer to receive digital encoded media when a first digital channel is selected by the tuner. Other components may be positioned between the tuner and the digital encoded media buffer, such as switches, digital demodulator, demux/descrambler etc. When the tuner is switching to a second channel, the digital encoded media buffer ceases to receive digital encoded media for the first digital channel, but continues to output digital encoded media for the first digital channel through an output. After the tuner has completed switching to the second channel, if the second channel is a digital channel then the digital encoded buffer receives digital encoded media for the second channel. If the second channel is an analog channel, then output from the tuner bypasses the digital encoded media buffer.
An advantage of the present invention is the ability to provide a television viewer with an uninterrupted presentation, without long periods of silence/blackness while the channel switches are being performed by the receiver. The television viewer is minimally impacted during such changes, and may not even notice. Even if such channel switches are not completely masked, the present invention allows minimization of the effect of such channel changes.
An additional advantage of the present invention is the ability to distribute portions of a television program between different channels to achieve bandwidth-efficiency.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
a illustrates the logical components on the analog signal path in a television receiver.
b illustrates the logical components of signal paths in a digital/analog television receiver.
The present invention finds utility in various data transmission applications including, but not limited to, transmission, reception and decoding of broadcast television signals (whether distributed via cable, terrestrial, satellite, microwave, etc.); encoding, multiplexing, and decoding of MPEG (Moving Pictures Expert Group) and AC-3 (Audio Coding algorithm, third generation) based multimedia streams. The invention is both applicable in distribution of television signals to the consumer homes as well as distribution from a originator to affiliate stations (such as cable headends).
Frequency Maps
Television programming (as well as other content) distributed via a television distribution system, is carried to the consumer's homes via a plurality of frequency-multiplexed channels.
Note that the example is specific to a US Cable network, yet a similar picture could easily be derived for other networks such as Satellite DTH, Terrestrial, Non-US Cable, Distribution Networks for Broadcasters (e.g., to affiliate stations), etc. Some television broadcast systems have return paths, others have not. Some have analog channels, some are only digital.
Common for a single distribution systems is that all (non-OOB) forward channels are carried in frequency bands of a fixed size (6 MHz in
In a system utilizing the present invention at least one of the channels will be digital, and the receiver unit must be capable of receiving and decoding digital television signals. Such a receiver is typically a digital consumer set-top box (STB) or a digital television set. Alternatively, it can be a commercial receiver as placed in headends of television broadcast networks. Such commercial decoders receive digital signals from their point of origination and manipulate these signals for further distribution down the network.
Digital Television Receivers
The digital signal processing path in a digital receiver is illustrated in
It should be noted that this diagram identifies the logical components that participate in the basic digital signal flow. In real implementations some of these functions may be combined (e.g. tuner and demodulator into one chip) and/or implemented in hardware or software (for example, the video decoder can be a hardware device or a software program, or combination thereof).
Most digital television receivers also support the reception of analog channels. This is specifically true in situations where analog and digital channels co-exist (for instance in a cable network where analog and digital programs are carried on the same cable infrastructure (as depicted in
The signal path for reception of analog channels only is shown in
b shows the combination of analog and digital signal paths in an analog/digital television receiver. Also shows in this Figure are switches 304 and 305 in the backend, which are used to select which signals (either from the digital path or from the analog path) to output.
Channel Switching
Here and in the remainder of this disclosure, channel switch time is defined as the time between presentation of the last video frame/audio sample from one (source) channel and the presentation of the first video frame/audio sample from the channel that is switched to.
In the generic case, when switching from any (analog or digital) channel to an analog channel, the following steps take place in a television receiver:
The typical amount of time necessary for changing to an analog channel can range between 200 and 1000 msec (or more), mainly depending on the quality of the signal and the tuner hardware/software.
Switching from any (analog or digital) channel to a digital channel involves considerably more steps in the general case:
As can be seen, the switch time to a digital channel can take a considerable amount of time, and can be as much as 2 seconds or more (especially if SW control overhead is included). Switching to an analog channel typically takes less time since no extensive digital processing steps have to be performed, but can still be up to 1.5 seconds of time as explained above.
Such long delays between changing channels (and having no video/audio present) is disruptive to the experience of the viewer and should be minimized. This holds for the general case of channel zapping, but even more in cases where the programming on the different channels is related.
The present invention discloses methods that can be used to reduce and/or mask the time needed for the switch. The invention focuses on methods that can be applied to today's digital television receivers (set-top boxes, commercial receivers, or other) without hardware modifications.
It should be noted that the methods described in this document work for both directed channel change (e.g. channel change initiated by the system, rather than the local viewer), and for more standard viewer initiated channel change (zapping).
The methods will work for all situations where a digital receiver is deployed, be it a receiver in the home (e.g. set top boxes, digital television sets, etc.) or a receiver in the distribution network (e.g. commercial receiver at cable plant, commercial receiver at local broadcasting station, etc.).
In the general case (basically the normal situation of a viewer, or the box autonomously, zapping between two channel) there are a few opportunities for masking/reducing the switch time as perceived by the viewer.
Method 1 (General): Dual Tuner Receivers
The first method to reduce the switch time works in receivers with two tuners as depicted in
When the switch is from an analog to a digital channel (or vice-versa) and the system has separate tuners for analog and digital channels, the signal paths are essentially separate, and only at the backend of the system it is decided which signal to route to the outputs of the receiver via switches 304 and 305. In this situation the solution to reducing the amount of silence/black when switching from analog to digital or from digital to analog is making the switch in the backend only AFTER the new signal path is producing audio/video, thus essentially reducing the switch time to zero.
Method 2 (General): Using Digital Video Buffer
In a situation where the source channel is digital, and the target channel analog or digital, the buffers in the digital signal path can be used to reduce the perceived switch time. As illustrated by
As shown in
For the switch to digital case, only after the decoders 204, 208 have been switched off, the control software 1003 instructs the tuner/demodulator to retune to the new desired frequency and achieve QAM-lock, as illustrated by label 1002. After the modulator 201 has achieved QAM lock, the demux 202 starts receiving a valid signal, and will be instructed by the control SW to filter required data, video, and audio packets. Subsequently, the control SW will switch on the video and audio decoders 204, 208 which will start producing audio/video (after the buffers 203, 207 are sufficiently full).
For the switch to analog case, the situation is similar, as shown in
The common channel change procedure just described is disadvantageous since the output is set to black/silence while there still is valid video and audio data in the decoder input buffers (whether the switch is from digital to digital or from digital to analog). An illustrative embodiment of the present invention exploits the presence of this data by not resetting the decoders 204 and/or 208 before starting the tune. Essentially, all steps as just described remain the same, except the audio and video decoders will not be switched off (i.e., step 1001 is omitted). This means that the audio/video decoders will keep playing, (potentially as mach as half a second, or even more) until their input buffers are empty. At that point the output signals would go to black/silence due to absence of data.
Method 3 (General): Avoiding Video ‘Jump’ in A/D or D/A Switch
Usually, when switching from a digital channel to an analog one the other way around, the video might ‘jump’, caused by losing synchronization, which is disadvantageous to the viewer's experience. This jump is even visible when the video itself is black. In analog video signals, the video sync is taken from the input signal itself. In the digital case, the receiver has to generate the synch itself. These two different synch signals are most likely not exactly aligned, meaning that the end of one frame at one signal is when the other synch signal is in the middle of refreshing a frame, leading to the ‘jump’ in the screen.
One option is to force the receiver to use its own generated synch signal for the analog video as well. Another option is to only turn on the video backend (renderers) when the synch is in the invisible region (so-called VBI—Vertical Blanking Interval).
Method 4 (General): Audio Ramp Down/Up
Similarly, when tuning to another signal, audio might cause some audible artifacts due to the sudden switch-off of the signal. This can be masked by a ramp-down just before the desired switch, and a ramp-up just after the switch is complete. The ramp-down/up periods could be as short as 1/10th of a second as indicated in
System for Personalized Messaging
In situations such as personalized advertising/messaging, one (digital) channel can carry one or more messages, one of which can be used to overlay the message on another (main) analog or digital channel. The exact message to play will be decided by the receiving equipment. This system is disclosed in
To support message replacement by the receiver at the consumer home, the headend contains a cue-tone detector 804 that detects the cue-tones 802 in the source programming. The cue-tone detector passes the incoming stream on virtually unchanged. The only change is that it takes out the cue-tone 802 and optionally replaces it by another trigger message 810 that can be used by the receiver in the consumer's homes to detect the switch moment. Cue-tone 810 might even be identical to 802, in which case nothing is changed in the stream.
In case channel 800 is analog, message 810 is typically encoded as VBI data, audio tones, or other analog encoded data. Another possibility is to use time-based switching, in which case the receivers have a clock and the network will generate time-stamped switching instructions that are sent ahead of time to the receivers. The receivers will receive these instructions, and execute the switch on the exact time specified in the instruction. This approach does require clock synchronization between central clocks and receiver clocks. There are several (well known) methods of doing this, such as: “slaving” all receiver clocks to a central master clock (as is done in some Access Control systems), constantly measuring the “drift” in the various receiver clocks and adjusting the system for it, etc.
In case channel 800 is digital, message 810 can be encoded in many different ways. In MPEG-2 systems the message can be encoded as private data, an MPEG splice-point message, etc. If the receiver has no capability of decoding any of these messages, there is again the option of using time-based return switching in which the receivers receive time-stamped return-switching instructions.
In personalized messaging it is advantageous to place alternative messages on a separate channel as also depicted in
The cue-tone detector and digital server are synchronized such that the alternative message 811 falls within the time window of message 803 in the main programming. Note that message 811 might be shorter than message 803, to allow for switching by the receiver from the main program to the alternative message, and back (without loosing content). Each switch might be up to 2 sec. as explained before. Also, some extra time might be added to allow for streams 808 and 809 to be drifting, e.g., because they are generated using a slightly different clock. In total, the amount of time the alternative message is shorter than the message that is overlaid in the main program is determined by the worst case situation, that has to be measured in the field with the deployed receivers.
Digital server 806 will insert a separate trigger message 812 in the channel that is used by the receiver to switch back to the main programming channel after the alternative message is finished. Message 812 can be encoded in many different ways since channel 809 is digital. For example, in MPEG it can be encoded as private data or any other type of data that can be detected by the receiver.
All television channels, including the ones just discussed, are subsequently combined and positioned at the right frequency in the frequency spectrum by combiners/upconverters 815. The resulting RF signal 816 is leaving the headend and passed on downstream, eventually reaching the receivers at the consumer's homes. Note that digital channels first pass through a modulator 814 that converts the digital bitstream into an analog signal.
Note that the system that has just been disclosed can be used in any situation where parts of a television program can be replaced by other parts that are located on one or more different channels.
Next, methods will be disclosed that can reduce the switching time by a receiver between streams 808 and 809 by preparing streams 809 ahead of time in the system as just described.
Method 5 (Specific): Sending Control Messages Ahead of Time
The first method consists of providing the basic control messages (such as PMT, PAT) for the new stream ahead of time (i.e., before the switch). This can be done in a number of ways.
One option is to standardize the content of the control messages in the receiver software (for instance in an MPEG-2 environment: always use fixed PIDs (Packet Identifiers) for the destination digital stream in personalized messaging).
Another option is to send the content of the control messages to the receiver as part of the analog program, before the switch takes place (e.g. insert the control messages in the VBI data of the analog program).
Yet another option is to send the content of the control messages to the receiver via another link (e.g. in an MPEG-2 cable system via an out-of-band channel, in a DTH system via phone modem).
This approach will ensure that the receiver does not have to wait for the messages to appear in the stream that has been switched to, saving up to 50 msec. of time.
Method 6: (Specific) Reduce Time Needed to Find Next I-Frame
The second method is ensuring that the video in the alternative message can be decoded right from the beginning. In an MPEG environment this means that the alternative message starts with an I-frame. This saves the decoder from waiting for the next I-frame before it can begin its decoding process. This technique can save as much as 500 msec. of time. Since the alternative message can be prepared ahead of time, and insertion of the message is controlled by the trigger messages in the main program, this is readily achieved.
Method 7: (Specific) Reduce Required Buffer Fullness
The third method is ensuring that video presentation starts as soon as possible (low latency). This can be achieved by reducing the initial VBV-delay for the alternative message. This can be done by either (temporarily) increasing the bitrate of the video (so that the buffer is filled quicker), or by encoding the video such that it needs less data in the buffer before encoding (e.g., by forcing a lower maximum VBV buffer size for the encoder). This invention can save as much as 200 msec. This would mean in
Together, methods 5-7 can lead to a saving of up to 750 msec. which is considerable. Method 2, in addition, can lead to a saving of up 300 msec. Thus, the total time needed for the switch can be reduced with more than a full second by employing methods 2, 5, 6, 7 together. This can be achieved without any hardware modifications of existing receivers.
Method 8: (Specific) Switch Back to a Scrambled Program
To descramble a digital stream certain control messages must be received before actual descrambling (and, consequently, video/audio presentation) can start. Examples of such messages are control words such as ECMs and EMMs (Entitlement Control Messages and Entitlement Management Messages).
Descrambling has an impact on Digital-to-Digital Switching, specifically if the original digital channel is scrambled. If a receiver switches to a scrambled stream, in addition to the steps discussed earlier, it will need some time to receive the Broadcast Access Control messages in the stream (which it needs for descrambling). This causes additional switching delay. An example of this occurs when the receiver is playing a scrambled stream, switches over to another stream to play out a personalized message (unscrambled), and then switches back to the original stream (at which point the additional delay will occur).
There are several ways of solving this issue. The preferred solution would be to ensure that the receiver, before switching from a stream A to a scrambled stream B, already has access to the Broadcast Access Control messages for stream B. This can be done by sending these messages via an electronic link (like a modem) to the receiver and storing them there until needed. Another approach is to simply embed (copy) the Broadcast Access Control messages from stream B in the original stream A. This is illustrated in
In a situation where it is desired that the alternative messages are also scrambled, it is a good option to scramble them using the same control words as used in the main program. This way, the receiver can switch back and forth between the channels without delays (since the same scrambling is used).
Each of the described methods provides some optimization of interstream switching. The present invention includes any possible permutation or combination of these methods. An illustrative embodiment of the present invention for optimizing switching from an analog to a digital channel includes the combination of methods 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. An illustrative embodiment of the present invention for optimizing switching from a digital channel to an analog channel includes the combination of methods 2, 3 and 4. An illustrative embodiment of the present invention for optimizing switching from a digital to another digital channel includes the combination of methods 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. In case that the digital channel is scrambled, then method 8 may be included to optimize the switching.
Although the invention has been shown and described with respect to illustrative embodiments thereof, various other changes, omissions and additions in the form and detail thereof may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It will understood that various modifications may be made to the embodiments disclosed herein. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplification of the various embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.
This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/375,562 filed Apr. 25, 2002 which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3366731 | Wallerstein | Jan 1968 | A |
3639686 | Walker et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
4331974 | Cogswell et al. | May 1982 | A |
4475123 | Dumbauld et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4573072 | Freeman | Feb 1986 | A |
4602279 | Freeman | Jul 1986 | A |
4625235 | Watson | Nov 1986 | A |
4638359 | Watson | Jan 1987 | A |
4703423 | Bado et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4716410 | Nozaki | Dec 1987 | A |
4789235 | Borah et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4814883 | Perine et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4847698 | Freeman | Jul 1989 | A |
4847699 | Freeman | Jul 1989 | A |
4847700 | Freeman | Jul 1989 | A |
4850007 | Marino et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4901147 | Tajima | Feb 1990 | A |
4918516 | Freeman | Apr 1990 | A |
5099422 | Foresman et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5105184 | Pirani et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5155591 | Wachob | Oct 1992 | A |
5173900 | Miller et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5220501 | Lawlor et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5231494 | Wachob | Jul 1993 | A |
RE34340 | Freeman | Aug 1993 | E |
5253940 | Abecassis | Oct 1993 | A |
5260778 | Kauffman et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5291395 | Abecassis | Mar 1994 | A |
5305195 | Murphy | Apr 1994 | A |
5343239 | Lappington et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347632 | Filepp et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5356151 | Abecassis | Oct 1994 | A |
5361393 | Rossillo | Nov 1994 | A |
5377354 | Scannell et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5414455 | Hooper et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422468 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5424770 | Schmelzer et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426281 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5434678 | Abecassis | Jul 1995 | A |
5442390 | Hooper et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442771 | Filepp et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446919 | Wilkins | Aug 1995 | A |
5448568 | Delpuch et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5499046 | Schiller et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5515098 | Carles | May 1996 | A |
5515270 | Weinblatt | May 1996 | A |
5519433 | Lappington et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526035 | Lappington et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537141 | Harper et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548532 | Menand et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550735 | Slade et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566353 | Cho et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5584025 | Keithley et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585838 | Lawler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585858 | Harper et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594910 | Filepp et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5610653 | Abecassis | Mar 1997 | A |
5617142 | Hamilton | Apr 1997 | A |
5632007 | Freeman | May 1997 | A |
5634849 | Abecassis | Jun 1997 | A |
5636346 | Saxe | Jun 1997 | A |
5638113 | Lappington et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5652615 | Bryant et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5671225 | Hooper et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682196 | Freeman | Oct 1997 | A |
5684918 | Abecassis | Nov 1997 | A |
5696869 | Abecassis | Dec 1997 | A |
5717814 | Abecassis | Feb 1998 | A |
5717923 | Dedrick | Feb 1998 | A |
5724091 | Freeman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5724472 | Abecassis | Mar 1998 | A |
5724521 | Dedrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5732217 | Emura | Mar 1998 | A |
5734413 | Lappington et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740388 | Hunt | Apr 1998 | A |
5740549 | Reilly et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754939 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758259 | Lawler | May 1998 | A |
5761601 | Nemirofsky et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764275 | Lappington et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768521 | Dedrick | Jun 1998 | A |
5774170 | Hite et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774664 | Hidary et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778181 | Hidary et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784095 | Robbins et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784528 | Yamane et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796945 | Tarabella | Aug 1998 | A |
5802314 | Tullis et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805974 | Hite et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825884 | Zdepski et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835087 | Herz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5861881 | Freeman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867208 | McLaren | Feb 1999 | A |
5873068 | Beaumont et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5887243 | Harvey et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903263 | Emura et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907837 | Ferrel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913031 | Blanchard | Jun 1999 | A |
5917830 | Chen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5929850 | Broadwin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931901 | Wolfe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937331 | Kalluri et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5978799 | Hirsch | Nov 1999 | A |
5986692 | Logan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991735 | Gerace | Nov 1999 | A |
6002393 | Hite et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018768 | Ullman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026368 | Brown et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029045 | Picco et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038000 | Hurst, Jr. et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038367 | Abecassis | Mar 2000 | A |
6049569 | Radha et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067348 | Hibbeler | May 2000 | A |
6075551 | Berezowski et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6108486 | Sawabe et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115080 | Reitmeier | Sep 2000 | A |
6137834 | Wine et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141358 | Hurst, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160570 | Sitnik | Dec 2000 | A |
6304852 | Loncteaux | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327574 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330286 | Lyons et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343287 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6357042 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6360234 | Jain et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6408278 | Carney et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411992 | Srinivasan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424991 | Gish | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449657 | Stanbach, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6457010 | Eldering et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463444 | Jain et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463585 | Hendricks et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466975 | Sterling | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6502076 | Smith | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6567980 | Jain et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574793 | Ngo et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6588013 | Lumley et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601237 | Ten Kate et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611624 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6671880 | Shah-Nazaroff et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678332 | Gardere et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681395 | Nishi et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694482 | Arellano et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6698020 | Zigmond et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6728965 | Mao | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735628 | Eyal | May 2004 | B2 |
6785289 | Ward et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6806909 | Radha et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6850252 | Hoffberg | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6857024 | Chen et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6877134 | Fuller et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
20010013123 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010013124 | Klosterman et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010056576 | Park et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020013943 | Haberman et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026359 | Long et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020056093 | Kunkel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057336 | Gaul et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083443 | Eldering et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020092017 | Klosterman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095676 | Knee et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020144262 | Plotnick et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020191116 | Kessler et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030110500 | Rodriguez | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030177503 | Sull et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030196211 | Chan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040025180 | Begeja et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040111742 | Hendricks et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136698 | Mock | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050086691 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086692 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050166224 | Ficco | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO9832284 | Jul 1998 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60375562 | Apr 2002 | US |