Patent Application
20140207788
The specification and drawings of each of the aforementioned applications are incorporated herein in their entirety, by this reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to database systems and more particularly, to a system and method for organizing data in a database system.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
Computerized database systems have long been used and their basic concepts are well known. A good introduction to database systems may be found in C. J. DATE, INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE SYSTEMS (Addison Wesley, 6th ed. 1994).
In general, database systems are designed to organize, store and retrieve data in such a way that the data in the database is useful. For example, the data, or partitioned sets of the data, may be searched, sorted, organized and/or combined with other data. To a large extent the usefulness of a particular database system, is dependent on the integrity (i.e., the accuracy and/or correctness) of the data in the database system. Data integrity is affected by the degree of “disorder” in the data stored. Disorder may occur in the form of erroneous or incomplete data such as duplicate data, fragmented data, false data, etc. In many database systems, from time to time, existing data may be edited and processed, and as a result, additional errors may be introduced. In some database systems, new data may be introduced. Additionally, as database systems are upgraded with new hardware and/or software, data conversion may be required or additional fields may become necessary. Furthermore, in some applications, the data in the database may simply become outdated over time.
Regardless of the preventative steps taken, some degree of disorder is eventually introduced in conventional database systems. This degree of disorder increases exponentially over time until eventually, the data in a conventional database becomes entirely useless. As a result, even a small degree of disorder eventually affects the integrity of the database system.
Unfortunately, identifying and correcting disorder in the data are often difficult, if not impossible, tasks particularly in large database systems. Traditionally, such tasks are performed manually, making these tasks time-consuming, expensive, and subject to human error. Furthermore, due to the very nature of the task, much of the disorder may go largely undetected. What is needed is a system and method for organizing data in a database system to overcome these and other associated problems.
The present invention provides a system and method for organizing data in a database system. The present invention derives a distilled database of accurate data from raw data included in one or more raw data sources. The raw data is converted from its original format(s) to a numeric format. According to one embodiment of the present invention, the raw data is represented as a vector having numeric elements. Once the raw data is represented numerically, various mathematical operations such as correlation functions, pattern recognition methods, or other similar numeric methods, may be performed on these vectors to determine how content in a particular vector corresponds to others vectors in a “distilled” or reference database. The distilled database is formed from sets of one or more related vectors that are believed to be unique (e.g., orthogonal) with respect to the other sets. These sets represent the best information available from the raw data. After all the raw data has been incorporated into the distilled database, new data may be screened to ensure that new errors are not introduced into the distilled database. The new data may be also evaluated to determine whether it is unique or whether it includes better information than that already present in the distilled database. The new data is added to the distilled database accordingly.
One of the features of the present invention is that raw data is converted into a numeric format based on a number system having an appropriate radix. An appropriate radix is determined according to the type of information included in the raw data. For example, for raw data generally comprised of alpha-numeric characters, an appropriate radix may be greater than or equal to the number of different alpha-numeric characters present in the raw data. Using such a number system allows raw data to be represented numerically, allowing for manipulation through various well-known mathematical operations.
Another feature of the present invention is that the number system may be selected so that the numbers-themselves retain semantic significance to the raw data they represent. In other words, the numerals in the number system are selected so that they correspond to the raw data. For example, in the case of raw data comprised of alphanumeric characters, the numerals are selected to correspond to the alphanumeric characters they represent. When the numerals in the number system are subsequently displayed, they appear as the alphanumeric characters they represent.
Another feature of the present invention is that once the raw data is represented as vectors in an appropriate number system, the represented data may be efficiently manipulated in the database (e.g., sorted, etc.) using various well-known techniques. Furthermore, various well-known mathematical operations may be performed on the vectors to analyze the data content. These mathematical operations may include correlation functions, eigenvector analyses, pattern recognition methods, and others as would be apparent.
Still another feature of the present invention is that the raw data is incorporated into a distilled database. The distilled database represents the best information extracted from the raw data without having any data disorder.
Yet another feature of the present invention is that new data may be compared to the distilled database to determine whether the new data actually includes any new information or content not already present in the distilled database. Any new information not already in the distilled database is added to the distilled database without adding any disorder. In this manner, the integrity of the distilled database may be maintained.
Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following drawings and description.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Additionally, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the drawing in which the reference number first appears.
The present invention is directed to a system and method for organizing data in a database system. The present invention is described below with respect to various exemplary embodiments, particularly with respect to various database applications. However, various features of the present invention may be extended to other areas as would be apparent. In general, the present invention may be applicable to many database applications where large amounts of seemingly unrelated data must be compiled, stored, manipulated, and/or analyzed to determine the various relationships present in the content represented by the data. More particularly, the present invention provides a method for achieving and maintaining the integrity (i.e., accuracy and correctness) of data in a database system, even when that data initially possesses a high degree of disorder. As used herein, disorder refers to data that is duplicative, erroneous, incomplete, imprecise, false or otherwise incorrect or redundant. Disorder may present itself in the database system in many ways as would be apparent.
One embodiment of the present invention is used to maintain a database associated with accounts receivable. In this embodiment, a company may collect data relating to various persons, businesses and/or accounts from one or more sources. These sources may include, for example, credit card companies, financial institutions, banks, retail, and wholesale businesses and other such sources. While each of these sources may provide data relating to various accounts, each source may provide data representing different information based on its own needs. Furthermore, this data may be organized in entirely different ways. For example, a wholesale distributor may have data corresponding to accounts receivable corresponding to business accounts. Such data may be organized by account numbers, with each data record having data fields identifying an account number, a business associated with that account number, an address of that business, and an amount owed on the account. A retail company may have data records representing similar information but based on accounts corresponding to individuals as well as businesses.
In other embodiments of the present invention, other types of sources may provide different types of data. For example, the scientific institutions may provide scientific data with respect to various areas of research. Industrial companies may provide industrial data with respect to raw materials, manufacturing, production, and/or supply. Courts or other types of legal institutions may provide legal data with respect to legal status, judgments, bankruptcy, and/or liens. As would be apparent, the present invention may use data from a wide variety of sources.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a database may be maintained to implement an integrated billing and order control system. In addition to billing-type information from sources similar to those described above, this embodiment may include data records corresponding to inventory, data records corresponding to suppliers of the inventory, and data records corresponding to purchasers of the inventory. Inventory data may be organized by part numbers, with each data record having data fields identifying an internal part number, an external part number (i.e., supplier part number), a quantity on hand, a quantity expected to ship, a quantity expected to be received, a wholesale price, and a retail price. Supplier data may be organized by a supplier number; and customer data may be organized by a customer number. Data records corresponding to each of these records may include data fields identifying a part number, a part price, a quantity ordered, a ship data, and other such information.
Another embodiment of the present invention may include an enterprise storage system that consolidates corporate information from multiple, dissimilar sources and makes that information available to users on the corporate network regardless of the type of the data, the type of computer that generated the data, or the type of computer that requested the data. Still another embodiment of the present invention includes a business intelligence system that warehouses and markets information and allows that information to be processed and analyzed on-line.
The present invention enables raw data collected from different sources to be analyzed and distilled into a collection of accurate data, organized in a way that is useful for a particular application. Using the above example of an integrated billing and order control system, explained more fully below, the present invention may produce a distilled database in which related data, such as data relating to a particular supplier or customer; may be identified as such. In this example, duplicate data corresponding to the same supplier or customer may be identified and/or discarded, and erroneous data associated with the supplier or customer may be identified, analyzed, and possibly corrected.
In general, the present invention may be implemented in hardware or software, or a combination of both. Preferably, the present invention is implemented as a software program executing in a programmable processing system including a processor, a data storage system, and input and output devices. An example of such a system 100 is illustrated in
Distilled data stored in a distilled database 230 is derived from the reference data of reference database 220. Distilled data represents the “accurate” data available from raw data 210. Distilled database 230 includes the unique information found in raw data 210. Distilled data thus represents the best information available from raw data 210.
As also explained below, the present invention further provides for using distilled database 230 to analyze and verify new data 240, which may also be used to update the reference database 220 and distilled database 230 as appropriate.
While the present invention has numerous embodiments, to clarify its description, a preferred embodiment is explained with reference to
According to the present invention, the reference data is then compared and analyzed to distill the best information available. In one embodiment of the present invention, this best information may be stored as distilled data in distilled database 230. This process is now described.
Raw data 210 will typically be received in the form of data records 400, as illustrated in
Examples of raw data 210 are illustrated in raw data tables 510, 520, and 530 of
Referring to
According to the present invention, raw data 210 is converted from its original representation into an appropriate numeric representation. An appropriate numeric representation uses a number system in which each possible value of data element 420 may be represented by a unique digit or value in the number system. In other words, a radix for the number system is selected such that the radix is at least as great as the number of possible values for a particular data element. For example, in a biotechnology application for detecting nucleotide sequences of Adenine (A), Guanine (G), Cytosine (C), and Thymine (T) in nucleic acids, each data element may be one of only four values: A, G, C, and T. In such an application, a radix of four for the number system may be sufficient to represent each data element as a unique number. One such number system may include the numbers A, G, C, and T. In some embodiments of the present invention, it may be desirable to use a radix at least one greater than the number of different possible value of data element 420 in order to provide a number representative of an empty field. In this case, such as number system may include the numbers A, G, C, T, and A, where A is the empty field value.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, data elements 420 in raw data 210 are comprised of characters such as alphanumeric characters. In this preferred embodiment, a radix of 40 is selected to represent the alphanumeric characters as illustrated in the table below. (Note that a minimum radix of 36 is required.) This radix is selected to accommodate the ten numeric characters “0”-“9” and the twenty-six alphabetic characters “A” to “Z” as well as to allow for several additional characters. In this embodiment, uppercase and lowercase characters are not distinguished from one another.
As illustrated in Table 1, the base-40 number system includes the numbers 0-9, followed by A-Z, further followed by four additional numbers. One of these numbers may used to represent an empty field. This number is used to represent a data field 410 that is empty or has no value (in contrast to a zero value). Other numbers may be used, for example, to represent other types of information such as spaces or used as control information.
Representation of raw data 210 in a base-40 format has numerous benefits. One benefit is that raw data 210 may be represented in a numeric fashion, facilitating straightforward mathematical manipulation. Another benefit is that proper selection of both the radix and the numerals in the number system allows the represented content to maintain semantic significance, facilitating recognition the content of raw data 210 in its representation in the numeric format. For example, the word “JOHN” represented by the four alphanumeric characters “J” “O” “H” “N” may be represented in various number systems. One such number system is a base-40 number system. Using Table 1, representing the alphanumeric characters “JOHN” as a base-40 number would result in the “tetradecimal” value ‘JOHN’, which is equivalent to the decimal value 1,255,103 (19*403+24*402+17*401+23*40°, where base-40 ‘J’ equals decimal 19, etc.). Note that the base-10 number loses semantic significance from the content of raw data 210 whereas the base-40 number retains semantic significance, as the number ‘JOHN’ is recognizable as the content “JOHN.” Semantic significance provides the benefits of a numeric representation while maintaining the ability to convey semantic content.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the selection of a radix and its corresponding number system may depend upon the number of bits used by processor 110. The number of bits used by processor 110 and the radix chosen for the number system define the number characters that can be represented by a data word in processor 110. This relationship is governed according to the following equation:
N=B*ln(2)/ln(R),
where N is the number of whole characters (i.e., fractional characters are discarded) represented by a data word of processor 110, B is the number of bits per data word, and R is the selected radix. This relationship limits the number of data elements 420 of raw data 210 that may fit in a data word. For example, in a 32-bit machine, the maximum number of characters that may fit in a data word using a base-40 number system is six (32*ln(2)/ln(40)=6.013). The maximum number of characters that may fit in a data word using a base-41 number system is only five (32*ln(2)/ln(41)=5.973). Thus, in some embodiments of the present invention, in addition to having a radix sufficiently large to maintain semantic significance, the radix may also be selected to maximize the number of characters represented by a single data word. In the embodiment with raw data comprised of alphanumeric characters, an appropriate radix may range from 36 to 40. This range maintains semantic significance while maximizing the number of characters represented by the 32-bit data word. Other types of raw data and other sizes of data word may dictate other appropriate radix ranges in other embodiments of the present invention.
The embodiment of the present invention described above does not distinguish between uppercase and lowercase characters. However, other embodiments of the present invention may distinguish between these types of characters. Accordingly, a base-64 representation (“0”-“9”, “A-“Z”, “a”-“z”, and two other values) may be appropriate to distinguish between these characters as would be apparent.
The number of data elements 420 in each data field 410 also dictates the precision required by the number as represented in processor 110. As described above, each data field 410 may only be six characters or data elements 420 wide for single precision operations in a 32-bit machine. In some embodiments of the present invention, this may be insufficient. In these embodiments, double, triple, or even quadruple precision may be required to represent the entire data field 410 as a single value. Double precision numbers are sufficient for up to twelve character data fields 410; triple precision numbers are sufficient for up to eighteen characters; and quadruple precision numbers are sufficient for up to twenty-four characters.
Alternate embodiments of the present invention may accommodate large data fields by breaking a large data field into one or more smaller data fields. The large data fields may be broken at boundaries defined by spaces. For example, a data field representing an address such as “123 West Main Street” may be broken into four smaller data fields: ‘123’, ‘West’, ‘Main’, and ‘Street’. The large data fields may also be broken at data word boundaries. In the address example above, the smaller data fields might be: ‘123We’, ‘st\Mai’, ‘n\Stre’, and ‘et’, where the number ‘\’ is used to represent a space. Other embodiments of the present invention may accommodate large data fields in other manners as would be apparent,
As illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, raw data 210 illustrated in
In the preferred embodiment, step 330 converts raw data 210 from the format illustrated in
Each reference database table 610-670 corresponds to an individual field from raw data tables 510, 520, and 530 of
Data is preferably stored in reference database 220 in such a way that all data corresponding to a single data record in a raw data table is readily identified. In the embodiment represented in
As illustrated in
In this example, key table 610 has a single field “PIDN,” which stands for personal identification number. Key table 610 provides a unique identifier such that a specific PIDN number never refers to more than one person represented in raw data 210. In other words, the PIDN number reflects the fact that many multiple records in raw data 210 may refer to the same person.
Preferably, each data record in the key table 610 initially corresponds to a different data record represented in the raw data tables 510, 520, and 530. For example, in
Initially, while a single PIDN does not refer to multiple individuals, a single individual may correspond to multiple PIDNs. For example, in
As discussed above, in this embodiment, records are represented in the reference database tables 610-670 as vectors having coefficients of base-40 numbers across eight one-field tables. This numeric representation allows the data to be analyzed using straightforward mathematical operations that may be used to, for example, produce correlations, calculate eigenvectors, perform various coordinate transformations, and utilize various pattern recognition analyses. These operations may, in turn, be used to provide or derive information about the records and their relationships to one another. By using small, one-field fables, these operations may be performed quickly. In addition, as will be illustrated, representation in base-40 numbers with raw data 210 including alphanumeric characters allows content of raw data 210 to retain its semantic significance.
Referring back to
In a step 710, reference database 220 is preferably partitioned or sorted into sets based on some criteria. These sorting criteria may vary. For example, as illustrated in table 810 of
In some embodiments of the present invention, not all vectors in reference database 220 will have data for the field on which the sets are based. Such vectors may be handled in various manners. For example, all vectors in reference database 220 having no data for that data field may be regarded as members of a single, additional set. Alternatively, each vector in reference database 220 having no data for that data field may be regarded as the single member of its own set.
Returning to
In some embodiments of the present invention, comparing a pair of vectors may identify duplicates. Various operations may be used, as would be apparent. In a simple example, a straightforward vector subtraction may be performed to measure the degree of similarity between two records. Other techniques may be used to identify duplicate vectors such as using “look-up” tables to identify common names, nicknames, abbreviations, etc.
Table 810 of
Vector (or matrix) operations comparing the vectors and thresholds for determining when two entries are similar enough to be regarded as duplicates may be defined as appropriate for various embodiments. In a simple example, the sum of the absolute differences between corresponding coefficients of a pair of vectors may indicate a similarity between the corresponding pair of records. This pair of vectors may be considered duplicates if a first vector is not inconsistent with any field of a second vector, and does not provide any additional data. In this embodiment, additional rules would also be defined, for example, for comparing entries of different lengths (e.g., right aligning character strings corresponding to numbers, and left aligning character strings corresponding to letters), for recognizing commonly misspelled or spelling variations of words, and for recognizing transposed letters in words. This processing may be performed by various mechanisms, as would be apparent. In the example of Table 810 of
Referring back to
As an example, a simple measurement of the correlation between vectors is their dot product, which may be weighted as appropriate. Depending on the application, the dot product may be calculated on only a subset of the vector coefficients, or may be defined to compare not only corresponding coefficients, but also other pairs of coefficients determined to be in related fields (i.e., comparing a “first name” coefficient of a first vector with a “middle name” coefficient of a second vector). As with the operations for identifying duplicate data, the correlation function may be appropriately tailored for its intended application. For example, a correlation function may be defined to appropriately compare entries of different lengths and to appropriately distinguish between significant and insignificant differences, as would be apparent.
In the embodiment explained with reference to the tables of
As a result of applying the correlation function, a correlation parameter reflecting the degree of independence of a pair of vectors is assigned. For example, a high value may be assigned to indicate a high degree of similarity, and a low value may be assigned to indicate a limited degree of similarity. The correlation value is then compared to a predetermined threshold value—which again, may vary in different applications—to determine whether the two records corresponding to those vectors are considered to be independent.
Based on the correlation values, in a step 740, the preferred embodiment partitions the data records into subsets of independent data records within each set. In the examples of
Results of applying such a function are illustrated in Table 820 of
Other operations for correlating the vectors are available. These may include computing dot products, cross products, lengths, direction vectors, and a plethora of other functions and algorithms used for evaluation according to well-known techniques.
Furthermore, while adding additional data fields to the vectors (i.e., extending the space) may separate clusters from one another to aid in their correlation, deleting data fields from the vectors (i.e., reducing the space) may also identify some correlations. In some embodiments of the present invention, reducing the space may identify, certain clusters that are in fact representing the same individual or other unique entity. For example, one record in a database may have ten data fields exactly identical to the same ten data fields in a second record in the database. These data fields may correspond to a first name, a birth date, an address, a mother's maiden name, etc. However, these two records may have two fields that are different. These two fields may correspond to a last name and a social security number. In some cases, these records may correspond to the same individual. The present invention simplifies the process for identifying these types of records that would be difficult, if not impossible, to detect using conventional methods.
Thus, removing one or more particular data fields from a vector and reducing the corresponding space may reveal clusters that otherwise would not be apparent. Doing this for data fields traditionally used for identification purposes (e.g., last name, social security number, etc.) may reveal duplicate records in databases. This may be particularly useful for identifying fraud. Removing data fields where a vector includes an empty field value for that data field may also reveal clusters that would not otherwise be apparent.
Furthermore, once the clusters are identified as representing the same individual or entity, the best information for the individual or entity may be extracted from the information provided by each record or “black dot.”
The principles of the present invention may be extended beyond simple vectors and data fields. For example, the present invention may be extended through the use of tensors representing objects in a multi-dimensional space. In this manner, the present invention may be used to represent the parameters of various physical phenomenon to gain additional insight into their operation and effect. Such application may be particularly useful for deciphering the human gene and aid in the efforts of programs such as the Human Genome Project.
Referring again to
Methods of evaluation may vary. For example, one embodiment may correlate each stranded entry with one member of each subset identified in step 740. Depending on the resulting correlation values, that vector may be added to the subset with which it is most highly correlated, or may define a new subset. Alternatively, in some embodiments, it may be determined that such evaluation is too time-consuming and step 750 may be completely skipped.
Steps 710-750 may be repeated as needed for specific embodiments. As noted above, some embodiments will have reference data 220 having a large number of fields and a large number of entries, with many entries having data for only a subset of fields. In such a case, performing steps 710-750 on a single field is unlikely to derive all relevant information. Even in the simple example explained with reference to
Thus, correlation across various data fields may be necessary to fully evaluate the degree of relatedness of the data in reference database 220.
Once steps 710-760 are completed, reference database 220 has been distilled into a distilled database 230, as illustrated in
Once data dialysis process 700 is complete, distilled database 230 identifies subsets of data records from the reference database 220 as related records, and as noted above, probabilities may be determined for fields in the reference database 220 to provide a qualitative measure of their completeness. This may be accomplished by assigning a probability of completeness to each of the individual data fields and then using them to compute an overall probability of completeness for the data record. For example, for a data field representing a first name, a value of ‘J’ may be assigned a low probability (e.g., 0 or 0.1), a value of ‘JOHN’ may be assigned a higher probability (e.g., 0.7 or 0.8), and a value of ‘JONATHAN’ may be assigned the highest probability (e.g., 0.9 or 1.0). These values may be assigned somewhat arbitrarily. However, these values help identify which data fields in the set are most likely to include the most complete information or in other words, the most probable data.
Use of the present invention may determine a significant amount of information about the records and their relationship to each other, and may be specifically tailored for particular applications. Furthermore, using standard database operations, distilled database 230 (which references records of the reference database 220) may be manipulated to provide formatted reports as needed. For example, an embodiment may be tailored to generate a report listing subsets of related records, with records of a subset providing information about a specific individual or entity. The records within such a subset may provide information, for example about different fields of information; aliases and/or variations of names, addresses, social security numbers, etc., used by the individual; and fields—such as occupation, address, and account numbers—for which that individual may have more than one entry.
Recalling that all data is represented in numerical base-40 format, the subsets may be ordered numerically in the report. The base-40 format provides the additional advantage of representing alphabetical characters as their respective letters (as illustrated in the conversion table above). Thus, while the report will show entries in numerical representation, that representation retains the semantic significance of the data it represents, allowing the data to be manually read and analyzed. For example, if the report shows records for an individual having entries for names including J SMITH, JOHN SMITH, JOHN G SMITH, G SMITH, and GERALD SMITH, a person reading that report would understand that this individual uses various first names, including his first name or initial, his middle name or initial, or some combination thereof.
As with conventional database applications, new data may be added from time to time. As illustrated in
Generally, new data records 240 may be formatted as described with reference to
Changes to data records in reference database 220 and distilled database 230 may be handled using standard database protection operations, as described in references such as C. J. DATE, INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE SYSTEMS (Addison Wesley, 6th ed. 1994) (see specifically, Part IV), referenced above. For example, in the case that changes are made to reference database 220 by an authorized database administrator, related data records in reference database 220 are updated as determined by standard relational definitions and where appropriate, in accordance with relations defined in distilled database 230.
One problem associated with conventional databases is a difficulty in merging records from a first database, such as raw data 210A, with those from a second database, such as raw data 210B. Records in these databases having shared or duplicate data need to be identified so that the content included therein may be merged as a single record in a database such as reference database 220 or distilled database 230. For example, both databases 210 may include one or more entries for JOHN SMITH. If the respective records in the databases 210 represent the same individual John Smith, then the content of each of the records should be merged as a single record in, for example, distilled database 230.
Conventional brute force methods for identifying such duplicate data in these databases involve comparing a data record from the first database with every data record in the second database, and repeating this process for each record in the first database. This process is time consuming and computationally intensive. In fact, the number of computations is geometrically related to the number of records in each of the two databases.
One process for reducing the time and number of computations required to identify the duplicate data in the databases 210 is described below with reference to
According to the present invention, each of the field vectors are sorted in numerical order, and if necessary, partitioned into sets of identical data as described above with respect to
Once the field vectors are sorted and partitioned, a value of the first element of a first field vector is compared with a value of the first element of a second field vector. Essentially, if the value in the first field vector is greater than the value in the second field vector, an index into the second field vector is advanced or otherwise adjusted to a position within the next partitioned set to obtain a next value in the second field vector. This next value in the second field vector is then compared to the value in the first field vector. This continues as long as the value in the first field vector is greater than the value in the second field vector.
On the other hand, if the value of the first field vector is less that the value of the second field vector, an index into the first field vector is advanced or otherwise adjusted to a position with the next partitioned set to obtain a next value in the first field vector. This next value in the first field vector is then compared to the value in the second field vector. This continues as long as the value in the first field vector is less than the value in the second field vector.
When the value of the first field vector equals the value in the second field vector, the process has identified duplicate data that is then preferably stored in a common field vector. After storing the identified duplicate data, the index into the first field vector and the index into the second field vector are both advanced or otherwise adjusted to a position within the next partitioned set of their respective field vectors.
The process thus described may be viewed as feedback control mechanism that adjusts the index into either of the arrays based on the difference between the values in the field vectors. In the embodiment described above, a positive difference generates an adjustment to the index of the second field vector whereas a negative difference generates an adjustment to the index of the first field vector. This process results in a linear relationship between the number of values in the field vectors and the number of computations (i.e., comparisons) required as opposed to the geometric relationship associated with conventional methods.
The present invention may be extended to sorting mechanisms as well. In cases where a particular value must be inserted into a field vector (i.e., a record must be inserted into a database) based on an ordering of the values in the vector (e.g., alphabetically, numerically, etc.), a difference between the particular value and a value of one of the elements in the vector is computed. This difference is “fed back” to adjust the index into the vector to generate the next value from the vector. Using well-established methods of control theory, the index adjustments may be integrated to determine the proper location of the value to be inserted. In addition to the integrator, a proportional gain may be applied to the difference to establish a desired system performance as would be apparent.
The present invention is now described with reference to
For purposes of this description, the pair of field vectors are referred to as a first field vector (“FV1”) and a second field vector (“FV2”), respectively. Preferably, the data in these field vectors are base-40 numbers that represent alphanumeric data as described above. However, in some embodiments of the present invention, the data may exist in other forms as well.
In a step 1010, the first field vector is sorted in numerical order. In a step 1020, the second field vector is also sorted in numerical order. In one embodiment of the present invention, the vectors are sorted in increasing numerical order, although other embodiments of the present invention may sort the vectors in decreasing order as would be apparent.
In a step 1030, partitioned sets within the first field vector having common values are identified. Likewise, in a step 1040, partitioned sets within the second field vector having common values are also identified. Steps 1010-1040 perform a similar function to the step of partitioning reference database 220 described above with reference to
In a step 1050, a common value vector that identifies the common values between the first and second field vectors is determined, preferably using the partitioned sets. Step 1050 is described in further detail with reference to
In a decision step 1120, the present invention determines whether the value in the I-th position of the first field vector is greater than or equal to the value of the J-th position of the second field vector. If so, processing continues at a decision step 1130; otherwise, processing continues at a step 1170. Step 1170 is performed, effectively, when the value in the I-th position of the first field vector is less than the value of the J-th position of the Second field vector. In step 1170, the first index I is adjusted to locate the beginning of the next partitioned set in the first field vector. After step 1170, processing continues at a decision step 1160.
In decision step 1130, the present invention determines whether the value in the I-th position of the first field vector is equal to the value of the J-th position of the second field vector. If so, processing continues at a decision step 1140; otherwise processing continues at a step 1180. Step 1180 is performed, effectively, when the value in the I-th position of the first field vector is greater than value of the J-th position of the second field vector. In step 1180, the second index J is adjusted to locate the beginning of the next partitioned set in the second field vector. After step 1180, processing continues at decision step 1160.
Step 1140 is performed, effectively, when the value in the I-th position of the first field vector is equal to the value of the J-th position of the second field vector. In step 1140, the value included in both the first and second field vectors is placed in the common value vector.
In a step 1150, the third index K is incremented to locate the position in the common value vector of the next common value to be identified. The first index I is adjusted to locate the beginning of the next partitioned set in the first field vector. The second index J is adjusted to locate the beginning of the next partitioned set in the second field vector.
In decision step 1160, the present invention determines whether additional partitioned sets exist in both the first field vector and the second field vector. If so, processing continues at step 1120. If no partitioned sets remain in either the first field vector or the second field vector, processing ends. When processing ends, the common value vector includes all the duplicate data identified between the first and second field vectors.
In a first loop, the first element (i.e., 0-th position) of FV1 is compared with the first element of FV2. (This is illustrated in
In the second loop, the next element of FV1 is compared with the next element of FV2. In this example, a value ‘9’ of FV1 is compared with a value ‘9’ of FV2. These values are again determined to be equal and the value ‘9’ is placed in the common value vector. As before, step 1150 adjusts both indices to point at the next partitioned sets in their respective field vectors. Decision step 1160 determines that more partitioned sets exist in both field vectors and a third loop is started.
In the third loop, the next element of FV1 is compared with the next element of FV2. In this example a value ‘10 of FV1 is compared with a value ‘12’ of FV2. Decision step 1120 determines that the value in FV1 is not greater than or equal to the value in FV2 and, in step 1170, the index to FV1 is adjusted to point at the next partitioned set therein. Decision step 1160 determines that more partitioned sets exist in both field vectors and a fourth loop is started.
In the fourth loop, the next element of FV1 is compared with the previous value of FV2. In this example, a value ‘12’ of FV1 is compared with the previously compared value of ‘12’ of FV2. Decision steps 1120 and 1130 determine that the values are equal, and in step 1140, the value ‘12’ is placed in the common value vector. Step 1150 adjusts both indices to point at the next partitioned sets in their respective field vectors. Decision step 1160 determines that more partitioned sets exist in both field vectors and a fifth loop is started.
In the fifth loop, the next element of FV1 is compared with the next value of FV2. In this example, a value ‘15’ of FV1 is compared with a value ‘18’ of FV2. Decision step 1120 determines that the value in FV1 is not greater than or equal to the value in FV2 and, in step 1170, the index to FV1 is adjusted to point at the next partitioned set therein. Because no more partitioned sets exist in FV1, processing ends.
In this example, five loops with a maximum of two comparisons per loop are required to identify three common values between the two field vectors. In a brute force method, 132 comparisons (12*11) are required.
Various embodiments of the present invention may be used for many different applications, some of which have been described and/or alluded to above. For example, in the application described above, the invention may be used to combine billing information collected from multiple sources to derive a distilled database in which related data records are recognized and duplicate and erroneous data records are eliminated. As suggested; this may be particularly useful in cases, for example, involving fraud. Typically, persons using credit card or other forms of retail fraud make minor changes to certain pieces of their personal information while leaving the majority of it the same. For example, oftentimes, digits in a social security number may be transposed or an alias may be used. Often, however, other information such as the person's address, date of birth, mother's maiden name, etc., is used identically. These types of fraud are readily identified by the present invention, even though they are difficult to identify by human analyses.
Other possible applications include uses in telemarketing, to compile a list of targeted individuals or addresses, or in mail-order catalogs, to reduce a number of catalogs sent to the same individual or family. Still another potential application is in the medical research or diagnostics fields, in which nucleotide sequences of Adenine (A), Guanine (G), Cytosine (C), and Thymine (T) in nucleic acids may be identified.
In other embodiments, the present invention may be used as a gatekeeper for a particular database at the outset to maintain integrity of the database from the very beginning, rather than achieving integrity in the database at a later date. In these embodiments, no raw data 210 is present and only new data 240 exists. Before new data 240 is added to the database, it is measured against distilled database 230 to determine whether new data 240 includes additional information or content. If so, only that new information or content is added to distilled database 230 by updating an existing record in distilled database 230 to reflect the new information or content as would be apparent.
While this invention has been described in a preferred embodiment, other embodiments and variations are within the scope of the following claims. For example, formatting process 300 may format data using different radices or other character sets, and may use various data structures. The data structures may represent multiple fields, and depending on the application, will represent a variety of fields. For example, in a credit application, fields may include an account status, an account number, and a legal status, in addition to personal information about the account holder. In a medical diagnostic application, fields may include various alleles or other genetic characteristics detected in tissue samples.
The present application is a continuation application of co-pending application Ser. No. 13/775,489, filed Feb. 25, 2013; which application is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 10/219,658, filed Aug. 16, 2002, now abandoned; which application is a continuation application of co-pending application Ser. No. 09/412,970, filed Oct. 6, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,457,006; which application is a continuation-in-part application of co-pending application Ser. No. 09/357,301, filed Jul. 20, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,969.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13775489 | Feb 2013 | US |
| Child | 14221682 | US | |
| Parent | 10219658 | Aug 2002 | US |
| Child | 13775489 | US | |
| Parent | 09412970 | Oct 1999 | US |
| Child | 10219658 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09357301 | Jul 1999 | US |
| Child | 09412970 | US |
