System and method for performing message-based load balancing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9246819
  • Patent Number
    9,246,819
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 20, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 26, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A system and method for message based load balancing comprises receiving, at a network traffic management device, an encapsulated request from a client device to a destination server for an established session. The request is encapsulated in accordance with a first connection-oriented protocol. The encapsulated message is segmented into a plurality of encapsulated data segments in accordance with a message boundary parameter. Identifying information of a first payload data packet of a first TCP encapsulated data segment is extracted and the first payload data packet is converted into a first connection-less protocol datagram. A message-based load balancing decision is performed on the datagram to assign the datagram to a first server. The first connection-less protocol datagram is converted into a first encapsulated data packet in accordance with a second connection-oriented protocol and is sent from a first virtual server to the first server based on the message-based load balancing decision.
Description
TECHNOLOGICAL FIELD

This technology generally relates to network traffic management, and more particularly, to a system and method for performing message-based load balancing.


BACKGROUND

Load balancing has been integral to providing high availability and scalability to web-based and non web-based applications. However, the type of protocol used in network communications between the client devices and the servers affect the ability to effectively handle load balancing. The HTTP protocol, for example, is synchronous and stateless, whereas other protocols such as Diameter, RADIUS, and Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) are asynchronous and do not adhere to a single request-reply communication sequence. The use of such asynchronous protocols makes it difficult to perform load balancing, because most load balancing systems are designed to operate in a synchronous messaging environment where a single request is made and responded to before another is processed.


Asynchronous protocols such as Diameter and SIP also maintain the one-to-one (1:1) relationship in which there is always a matching reply for every request. However, unlike traditional web-based protocols, they do not need to maintain a strict synchronous exchange. In other words, multiple requests may be sent before a reply is received in an asynchronous protocol. This makes load balancing systems that use traditional protocols, like HTTP or TCP, unable to handle load balancing responsibilities as they cannot process more than one request at a time and are limited to load balancing on a per-connection basis.


Load balancing is accomplished in typical systems at the Layer 4 (TCP) protocol on a per-session or per-connection basis. All requests received over the same session are load balanced to the same server. When communications are complete, the session is terminated. This behavior is not acceptable for some protocols, particularly those associated with service provider and telecommunications implementations that utilize SIP, Diameter, Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and RADIUS protocols. These protocols carry communications over longer-lived sessions, whereby the communications are potentially required to be processed by different servers. This means traditional load balancing mechanisms are incapable of supporting the scalability and availability requirements of such protocols.


In a typical synchronous request-reply protocol, such as TCP, each request can be directed to a specific server based on a variety of parameters, such as the content or request type. This behavior is also desirable in message-oriented communication, but it is typically more difficult to support for SIP, RADIUS and Diameter protocols due to the need to scale intermediaries to open and maintain multiple connections to different servers. As stated above, traditional TCP based load balancing maintains a 1:1 ratio between requests and server-side connections. However, in a message-oriented protocol such as SIP or Diameter, there may be a need to maintain a one-to-many (1:N) ratio between requests and server-side connections. One way to solve the challenges associated with scaling message oriented protocols such as SIP and Diameter is the ability to extract individual messages out of a single, shared TCP connection.


What is needed is a system and method that is configured to inspect application layer data in split out individual messages from a connection-oriented protocol and distribute them appropriately to different servers using a connection-less protocol.


SUMMARY

In an aspect, a method for message based load balancing comprises receiving, at a network traffic management device, an encapsulated request from a client device to a destination server for an established session, wherein the request is encapsulated in accordance with a first connection-oriented protocol. The method includes segmenting the encapsulated message into a plurality of encapsulated data segments in accordance with a message boundary parameter. The method includes extracting identifying information of a first payload data packet of a first encapsulated data segment. The method includes converting the first payload data packet into a first connection-less protocol datagram at the network traffic management device. The method includes performing a message-based load balancing decision on the first connection-less protocol datagram at the network traffic management device to assign the first connection-less protocol to a first server based on the message-based load balancing decision. The method includes converting, via the network traffic management device, the first connection-less protocol datagram into a first encapsulated data packet, wherein the data packet is encapsulated in accordance with a second connection-oriented protocol. The method includes sending the first encapsulated data packet from a first virtual server to the first server based on the message-based load balancing decision.


In an aspect, a non-transitory machine readable medium having stored thereon instructions message based load balancing. The medium comprises machine executable code which when executed by at least one machine associated with a network traffic management device, causes the machine to receive an encapsulated request from a client device to a destination server for an established session, wherein the request is encapsulated in accordance with a first connection-oriented protocol. The machine segments the encapsulated message into a plurality of encapsulated data segments in accordance with a message boundary parameter. The machine extracts identifying information of a first payload data packet of a first encapsulated data segment. The machine converts the first payload data packet into a first connection-less protocol datagram. The machine performs a message-based load balancing decision on the first connection-less protocol datagram, wherein the first connection-less protocol datagram is assigned to be sent to a first server via a first virtual server based on the message-based load balancing decision. The machine converts the first connection-less protocol datagram into a first encapsulated data packet, wherein the data packet is encapsulated in accordance with a second connection-oriented protocol. The machine sends the first encapsulated data packet from the first virtual server to the first server based on the message-based load balancing decision.


In an aspect, a network traffic management device for protocol conversions in policy changing enforcement comprises a network interface coupled to a client device and one or more servers via a network. The network interface receives a request from the client device requesting access to the server. The network traffic management device includes a processor coupled to the network interface. The processor is operative to receive an encapsulated request from a client device to a destination server for an established session, wherein the request is encapsulated in accordance with a first connection-oriented protocol. The processor is operative to segment the encapsulated message into a plurality of encapsulated data segments in accordance with a message boundary parameter. The processor is operative to extract identifying information of a first payload data packet of a first encapsulated data segment. The processor is operative to convert the first payload data packet into a first connection-less protocol datagram. The processor is operative to perform a message-based load balancing decision on the first connection-less protocol datagram, wherein the first connection-less protocol datagram is assigned to be sent to a first server via a first virtual server based on the message-based load balancing decision. The processor is operative to convert the first connection-less protocol datagram into a first encapsulated data packet, wherein the data packet is encapsulated in accordance with a second connection-oriented protocol. The processor is operative to send the first encapsulated data packet from the first virtual server to the first server based on the message-based load balancing decision.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram of an example system environment that includes a network traffic management device in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the network traffic management device shown in FIG. 1 in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure;



FIG. 3 is an example flow chart diagram depicting at least a portion of a process for performing message-based load balancing on requests sent from one or more client devices to one or more servers in accordance with the present disclosure; and



FIG. 4 is an example flow chart diagram depicting at least a portion of a process for performing message-based load balancing on responses sent from one or more servers to one or more client devices in accordance with the present disclosure.





While these examples are susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail preferred examples with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification and is not intended to limit the broad aspect to the embodiments illustrated.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 is a diagram of an example system environment that includes a network traffic management device in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure. Referring now to FIG. 1, an example system environment 100 employs one or more network traffic management device 110 that is capable of performing message-based load balancing. The example system environment 100 includes one or more Web and/or non-Web servers 102, one or more client devices 106 and the one or more network traffic management device 110, although the environment 100 could include other numbers and types of devices in other arrangements. The network traffic management device 110 is coupled to the web application servers 102 via local area network (LAN) 104 and client devices 106 via network 108. Generally, requests sent over the network 108 from client devices 106 towards the servers 102 are received by the network traffic management device 110. In an aspect, one or more of the client devices 106 are mobile devices which access and communicate with the servers 102 via one or more mobile gateways which allow communication over the Network 108.


Client devices 106 comprise network devices capable of connecting to other computing devices, such as the network traffic management device 110 and the server 102. Such connections are performed over wired and/or wireless networks, such as network 108, to send and receive data, such as for Web-based and/or non Web-based requests, receiving responses to requests and/or performing other tasks. Non-limiting and non-exhausting examples of such client devices include personal computers (e.g., desktops, laptops, tablets), smart televisions, stand alone multimedia devices, mobile and/or smart phones and the like. In an example, client devices 106 can run Web browsers that may provide an interface for operators, such as human users, to interact with for making requests for resources to different web server-based applications or Web pages via the network 108, although other server resources may be requested by clients. One or more Web-based applications may run on a web application server 102 that provide the requested data back to one or more network devices, such as client devices 106.


The server 102 comprises one or more server computing machines capable of operating one or more Web-based and/or non Web-based applications that may be accessed by other network devices in the network 108. Such network devices include client devices 106, the network traffic management device 110, and the like. The server 102 may provide data representing requested resources, such as particular Web page(s), image(s) of physical objects, and any other objects, responsive to the requests received from the client device 106. It should be noted that the server 102 may perform other tasks and provide other types of resources. It should be noted that while only two servers 102 are shown in the environment 100 depicted in FIG. 1, other numbers and types of servers may be coupled to the network traffic management device 110. It is also contemplated that one or more of the servers 102 may be a cluster of servers managed by one or more network traffic management devices 110.


Network 108 comprises a publicly accessible network, such as the Internet, which allows communications to and from client devices 106. However, it is contemplated that the network 108 may comprise other types of private and public networks that include other devices. Communications, such as requests from clients 106 and responses from servers 102, take place over the network 108 according to standard network protocols, such as the HTTP and TCP/IP protocols in this example. However, the principles discussed herein are not limited to this example and can include other protocols. Further, it should be appreciated that network 108 may include local area networks (LANs), wide area networks (WANs), direct connections and any combination thereof, as well as other types and numbers of network types. On an interconnected set of LANs or other networks, including those based on differing architectures and protocols, routers, switches, hubs, gateways, bridges, cell towers and other intermediate network devices may act as links within and between LANs and other networks to enable messages and other data to be sent from and to network devices. Also, communication links within and between LANs and other networks typically include twisted wire pair (e.g., Ethernet), coaxial cable, analog telephone lines, full or fractional dedicated digital lines including T1, T2, T3, and T4, Integrated Services Digital Networks (ISDNs), Digital Subscriber Lines (DSLs), wireless links including satellite links and other communications links known to those skilled in the relevant arts. In essence, the network 108 includes any communication method by which data may travel between the client devices 106, the servers 102 and the network traffic management device 110, and the like.


LAN 104 comprises a private local area network that includes the network traffic management device 110 coupled to the one or more servers 102, although the LAN 104 may comprise other types of private and public networks with other devices. Networks, including local area networks, besides being understood by those skilled in the relevant arts, have already been generally described above in connection with network 108 and thus will not be described further.


As per the TCP/IP protocols, requests from the requesting client devices 106 may be sent as one or more streams of messages which include data packets over the network 108 to the network traffic management device 110 and/or the servers 102. Such Layer 4 protocols can establish connections, send and receive data for existing connections, and the like. It is to be understood that the one or more servers 102 may be hardware and/or software, and/or may represent a system with multiple servers that may include internal or external networks. In this example, the servers 102 may be any version of Microsoft® IIS servers, RADIUS servers, DIAMETER servers and/or Apache® servers, although other types of servers may be used. Further, additional servers may be coupled to the network 108 and many different types of applications may be available on servers coupled to the network 108.


As shown in the example environment 100 depicted in FIG. 1, the network traffic management device 110 is interposed between client devices 106 in network 108 and servers 102 in LAN 104. Again, the environment 100 could be arranged in other manners with other numbers and types of devices. Also, the network traffic management device 110 is coupled to network 108 by one or more network communication links and intermediate network devices (e.g. routers, switches, gateways, hubs and the like) (not shown). It should be understood that the devices and the particular configuration shown in FIG. 1 are provided for exemplary purposes only and thus are not limiting.


Generally, the network traffic management device 110 manages network communications, which may include one or more client requests and server responses, from/to the network 108 between the client devices 106 and one or more of the servers 102 in LAN 104. These requests and responses are sent between one or more client devices 106 and one or more servers 102 in the form of one or more TCP/IP data packets. The requests pass through one or more intermediate network devices and/or intermediate networks, until they ultimately reach the network traffic management device 110. In any case, the network traffic management device 110 may manage the network communications by performing several network traffic related functions involving the communications. Such functions include load balancing, access control, protocol conversion, segmentation of packets, and the like.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example network traffic management device shown in FIG. 1 in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 2, the example network traffic management device 110 includes one or more device processors 200, one or more device I/O interfaces 202, one or more network interfaces 204, one or more load balancing modules 210, one or more protocol conversion modules 212, one or more device memories 214, and one or more virtual server modules 216, 218, and 220, all of which are coupled together via bus 208. It should be noted that the device 110 could include other types and numbers of components.


Device processor 200 comprises one or more microprocessors configured to execute computer/machine readable and executable instructions stored in device memory 214, and in particular the load balancing module 210 and the conversion module 212. Such instructions implement network traffic management related functions of the network traffic management device 110. In addition, the processor 200, upon executing the software instructions of the load balancing and conversion modules 210, 212, will perform one or more portions of the processes described below in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure.


Device I/O interfaces 202 comprise one or more user input and output device interface mechanisms. The interface may include a computer keyboard, mouse, touch screen, display device, and the corresponding physical ports and underlying supporting hardware and software to enable the network traffic management device 110 to communicate with the outside environment. Such communications may include accepting user data input and to provide user output, although other types and numbers of user input and output devices may be used. Additionally or alternatively, as will be described in connection with network interface 204 below, the network traffic management device 110 may communicate with the outside environment for certain types of operations (e.g., configuration) via a network management port.


Network interface 204 comprises one or more mechanisms that enable network traffic management device 110 to engage in network communications using one or more network protocols (e.g. TCP, HTTP) over LAN 104 and network 108. However, it is contemplated that the network interface 204 may be constructed for use with other communication protocols and types of networks. Network interface 204 is sometimes referred to as a transceiver, transceiving device, or network interface card (NIC), which transmits and receives network data packets to one or more networks, such as LAN 104 and network 108. The network interface 204 is utilized by one or more virtual servers 216, 218, 220 to send and receive encapsulated data packets between the network traffic management device 110 and one or more physical servers 102.


In an example where the network traffic management device 110 includes more than one device processor 200 (or a processor 200 has more than one core), each processor 200 (and/or core) may use the same single network interface 204 or a plurality of network interfaces 204. Further, the network interface 204 may include one or more physical ports, such as Ethernet ports, to couple the network traffic management device 110 with other network devices, such as servers 102. Moreover, the interface 204 may include certain physical ports dedicated to receiving and/or transmitting certain types of network data, such as device management related data for configuring the network traffic management device 110.


Bus 208 may comprise one or more internal device component communication buses, links, bridges and supporting components, such as bus controllers and/or arbiters. The bus enable the various components of the network traffic management device 110, such as the processor 200, device I/O interfaces 202, network interface 204, EAM agent module 210 and device memory 214, to communicate with one another. However, it is contemplated that the bus may enable one or more components of the network traffic management device 110 to communicate with components in other devices as well. Example buses include HyperTransport, PCI, PCI Express, InfiniBand, USB, Firewire, Serial ATA (SATA), SCSI, IDE and AGP buses. However, it is contemplated that other types and numbers of buses may be used, whereby the particular types and arrangement of buses will depend on the particular configuration of the network traffic management device 110.


Device memory 214 comprises non-transitory computer readable media, namely computer readable or processor readable storage media, which are examples of machine-readable storage media. Computer readable storage/machine-readable storage media may include volatile, nonvolatile, removable, and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information. Examples of computer readable storage media include RAM, BIOS, ROM, EEPROM, flash/firmware memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information. Such desired information includes data and/or computer/machine-executable instructions and which can be accessed by one or more processors 200 of the network traffic management device 110.


Such storage media contains computer readable/machine-executable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data, which may be obtained and/or executed by one or more processors, such as device processor 200. Such instructions allow the processor to perform actions, including implementing an operating system for controlling the general operation of network traffic management device 110 to manage network traffic and execute the instructions of the load balancing and conversion modules 210, 212 in relation to the processes described in accordance with the present disclosure.


As shown in FIG. 2, the load balancing module 210 performs message-based load balancing logic on data messages received from external network devices, such as client devices 106 and servers 102. Additionally, the protocol conversion module 212 is configured to convert the messages from the connection-oriented protocol to a connection-less protocol. The virtual servers 216, 218, 220 process and transmit each of their assigned load balanced data packets to one or more dedicated physical servers 102.


As will be discussed in more detail below, the load balancing module 210 operates in conjunction with the protocol conversion module 212 to allow the network traffic management device 110 to effectively perform the message based load balancing process on any received message. In particular, the protocol conversion module 212 segments the encapsulated data packets and de-encapsulates the data segments to allow the load balancing module 210 to extract specific identifying information of the payload data along with other desired information. The extracted information is processed by the load balancing module 210 to allow it to make message-based load balancing decisions on each data packet. Converting the messages into the connection-less protocol allows the network traffic management device 110 to internally route each data packet to an assigned virtual server 216, 218, 220. The virtual servers 216, 218, 220 operate in conjunction with the network interface 204 as well as the load balancing module 210 and protocol converting module 212 to send and receive load balanced data packets with the physical servers 102.


In particular, each virtual server is configured to establish a connection with its dedicated server 102, via a handshake, that is independent of the original connection established between the client device 106 and the server 102. Once the connection is established, data packets assigned to a respective virtual server will be transmitted from that virtual server to its dedicated server 102. Additionally, response messages from each server are sent back to its dedicated virtual server in the network traffic management device 110. As shown in FIG. 2, virtual server 216 (VS1) is shown to transmit and receive data packets to server 1021, whereas virtual server 218 (VS2) is shown to transmit and receive data packets to server 1022. Similarly, virtual server 220 (VSn) is shown to transmit and receive data packets to server 102n. It should be noted that although three virtual servers 216, 218, 220 are shown in FIG. 2, any number of virtual servers are contemplated. Additionally, it is contemplated that one or more virtual servers may be configured to communicate with more than one server 102, instead of just one server as shown in FIG. 2. It should also be noted that although the virtual servers 216, 218, 220 are shown within the network traffic management device 110, it is contemplated that the virtual servers 216, 218, 220 may be located external to the network traffic management device 110.


As mentioned above, the present system and method utilizes the advantages of a message-based connectionless transmission protocol, such as UDP, to allow message based load balancing logic to be effectively applied to one or more messages. However, considering that the connection that is established between the client devices 110 and the servers 102 are to be in compliance with a connection-oriented protocol, such as TCP, the present system and method ensures that all messages that are sent and received are in compliance with the connection-oriented protocol.



FIG. 3 is an example flow chart diagram depicting at least a portion of a process for performing message-based load balancing on one or more requests received from one or more client devices in accordance with the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 3, a user, via the client device 106, sends a request to access one or more resources from a destination server 102. To be able to allow the communication to occur between the client device 106 and the destination server 102, a connection is established between the client device 106 and the server 102 using traditional handshake methods (Block 300). The connection, once established, utilizes a Layer 4 connection-oriented transmission protocol, such as TCP, to allow data packets to be sent between the client device 106 and the server 102. As should be noted, one or more network traffic management devices 110 establish the connection as well as handle all network traffic between the client device 106 and the server 102. Although TCP is described in the present example as the connection-oriented protocol, it is contemplated that other connection-oriented protocols may be used for the connection between the client device 106 and the server 102.


Thus, when the request from the client device 106 is received at the network traffic management device 110, it is received as an encapsulated data message in accordance with a connection-oriented protocol (e.g. TCP) (Block 302). In performing the message-based load balancing process of the present disclosure, the load balancing module 210 of the network traffic management device 110 initially identifies the boundaries of the first or incoming encapsulated data message in accordance with a set boundary parameter and segments the data message into “N” number of data segments (Block 304). The byte sizes defined in the boundary parameter may be set by a network administrator, in an aspect. In an aspect, the network traffic management device 110 may be configured to generate each data segment to have the same byte size in accordance with the defined boundary parameter. In an aspect, the network traffic management device 110 may be configured to segment the data message in a way to have different sized data segments. In either event, the network traffic management device 110 stores the byte sizes of each data segment as this information is eventually used when converting the data segments, as will be discussed in more detail below.


Thereafter, the protocol converting module 212 of the network traffic management device 110 de-encapsulates each data segment in and extracts necessary header information and payload data information (Block 306). In addition the payload data information and other header information, such as Session ID, source IP address and the like, can be extracted from the de-encapsulated data segment.


Additionally, the protocol converting module 212 encapsulates the payload data packet in into a Layer 4 connectionless protocol datagram (Block 306). In an aspect, the protocol converting module 212 encapsulates the payload data packet in into a UDP datagram, although other connectionless transmission protocols are contemplated.


In encapsulating the payload data packet in into the connectionless transmission protocol datagram, the protocol converting module 212 will place, in the header of the datagram, the destination port number of the virtual server which will eventually transmit the data packet to the server, the IP address of the client device 106, the Session ID information as well as the IP address of the server 102 where the payload data packet in is to be sent. Other information which allows successful outbound transmission of the data packet in to the server is also inserted into the header and also stored in the internal memory 214 of the network traffic management device 110.


The load balancing module 210 of the network traffic management device 110 then examines the encapsulated datagram and, in particular, at least a portion of the payload data and key information code. The key information code is used by the load balancing module 210 to perform message-based load balancing logic on the datagram. In performing the load balancing logic, the load balancing module 210 utilizes the key information code to assign an appropriate server 102 where the datagram should be routed (Block 308).


In an example where the request message is sent from the client device using the Diameter protocol, the network traffic management device 110 examines an attribute-value pair (AVP) code in the request. The AVP code will identify one or more specific services related to authentication and authorization of services which need to be performed by a Diameter-based server. In other words, the network traffic management device 110 load balances requests that are based on the Diameter protocol using AVP codes even though the requests are sent over the same long-lived session. Since the sessions are long-lived for network traffic using the Diameter protocol, the load balancing logic employed by the load balancing module 210 is able to maintain connections to multiple servers 102 and thus correctly route requests based on the AVP codes contained within the Diameter messages. For other protocols, such as LDAP, these protocols may contain various information including search base, query string (LDAP filter) which the load balancing module 210 may use as the key information code to decide which server 102 to route the message to.


Subsequent messages received from the client device 106 over the connection with the same key information code will be processed and routed by the load balancing module 210 to the same designated server, although this is not necessary. In contrast, messages received over the same or different connection and containing a different key information code is processed and routed by the load balancing module 210 to a different server 102. The load balancing module 210 of the network traffic management device 110 is thus able to act upon message-level information rather than connection information to perform load balancing logic on the received messages.


After the load balancing module 210 performs the load balancing logic on the datagram and determines which server 102 to route the datagram to, the load balancing module 210, the network traffic management device 110 routes the encapsulated datagram to an assigned virtual server 216, 218, 220 that is dedicated to transmit the datagram to its assigned server 102. As stated above, each virtual server is configured to establish a connection with its dedicated server 102, via a handshake, that is independent of the original connection established between the client device 106 and the server 102.


As shown in FIG. 3, the encapsulated datagram is then sent to the appropriate virtual server 216, 218 or 220 for handling (Block 312). Generally, the virtual server in the network traffic management device 110 prepares the encapsulated datagram for transmission to the designated server 102 that has been identified in accordance with the load balancing logic step. In particular, the network traffic management device 110 de-encapsulates the datagram, and using the header information in the datagram, encapsulates the payload data packet into a Layer 4 connection-oriented transmission protocol, such as TCP (Block 314). In encapsulating the payload data packet in accordance with the TCP protocol, the network traffic management device 110 is able to insert destination information of the designated server 102 where the encapsulated segment is to be transmitted. If a connection to the designated server 102 has not already been established, the virtual server 216, 218, or 220 contacts the designated server 102 and uses the Session ID in the TCP header to allow the network traffic management device 110 to track the active sessions and also ensure proper routing of outbound and inbound data packets. It is also contemplated that the virtual server also inserts its IP address in the header information to enable data packets sent back from the server 102 to be correctly routed to the corresponding transmitting virtual server. In an example, virtual server 218 VS2 would insert its IP address as the source address in the encapsulated header prior to sending the data packet to server 1022. This will allow any response messages sent from server 1022 to be received by virtual server 218 VS2. The virtual server of the network traffic management device 110 then transmits the encapsulated data segment to the designated server 102 in accordance with the message-based load balancing process (Block 316).


As shown in FIG. 3, the process then proceeds as to whether there are other data segments that need to processed and load-balanced by the network traffic management device 110 (Block 318). If not, the process proceeds to Block A. Otherwise, the process returns to Block 306 to process and load balance other data segments in. For example, for a request that is segmented into twenty (20) data segments, the value “n” would be 20, whereby the network traffic management device 110 would process 19 other data segments after processing the first data segment. In the example in FIG. 3, the process at Block 318 continues where the “n” value is incremented by 1 to identify the next data segment to be processed (e.g. data segment i2). It should be noted that although FIG. 3 indicates that each data segment is processed and transmitted sequentially, it is contemplated that the network traffic management device 110 may be able to perform the process on more than one data segment simultaneously.



FIG. 4 is an example flow chart diagram depicting at least a portion of a process for performing message-based load balancing on one or more requests received from one or more client devices in accordance with the present disclosure. As discussed in FIG. 3, data segments are designated by the load balancer module 210 to be sent out by assigned virtual servers to their corresponding destination servers 102. As shown in FIG. 4, TCP encapsulated response messages that correspond to the transmitted data segments are sent from the various servers 102 back to the network traffic management device 110. In particular, each TCP encapsulated data response message contains the source port address of the dedicated virtual server which previously sent the data segment. This allows the appropriate virtual server to receive and process the response message sent back from the server 102 (Block 400).


In particular, the network traffic management device 110, upon receiving the response message at its respective virtual server, initially segments the data message into “n” number of data segments, whereby the data segments have a set byte size in accordance with a set boundary parameter, as described above (Block 402).


Thereafter, the virtual server de-encapsulates each data segment and extracts necessary header information along with the payload data packet to effectively identify the appropriate client device where the payload data of the response should be routed (Block 404). In an aspect, Session ID information from the header information as well as the key information code for the data segment is processed to allow the network traffic management device 110 to identify which session the payload data belongs to.


The protocol converting module 212 of the network traffic management device 110 then encapsulates the payload data packet into a Layer 4 connectionless transmission protocol format, such as UDP, to generate an encapsulated datagram of the extracted payload data packet (Block 406). It should be noted that although UDP protocol is mentioned, other connectionless transmission protocols are contemplated.


As described in relation to the process in FIG. 3, when the network traffic management device 110 performs the above described procedure on messages sent from the client device 106 to the server 102, the network traffic management device 110 stores the identity of the requesting client device along with other information (e.g. Session ID) that maps the routing information between the client device 106 and the server 102 for each data packet. Accordingly, this mapped routing information is retrieved by the network traffic management device 110 and inserted into the header of the encapsulated datagram. This ensures that each response data segment is properly routed by the network traffic management device 110 to the appropriate client device 106.


Thereafter, the load balancing module 210 of the network traffic management device 110 performs load balancing logic on the datagram to effectively route the payload data to the proper client device 106 (Block 408). Similar to the process described in FIG. 3, subsequent messages received from any of the servers 102 that have the same key information code will be routed by the network traffic management device 110 to the same client device 106. In contrast, messages received over the same connection but containing a different key information code is processed by the network traffic management device 110 to another appropriate client device 106. The network traffic management device 110 is thus able to act upon message-level information rather than connection information to perform load balancing logic on the received response messages.


As shown in FIG. 4, the encapsulated datagram is then prepared by the network traffic management device 110 for transmission to the appropriate client device 106. In particular, the network traffic management device 110 de-encapsulates the datagram, and using the header information in the datagram, encapsulates the payload data packet into a Layer 4 connection-oriented transmission protocol, such as TCP (Block 410). In encapsulating the payload data packet in accordance with the TCP protocol, the network traffic management device 110 is able to insert routing information taken from the encapsulated datagram which identifies the client device 106 and the Session ID of the data segment (Block 410). The network traffic management device 110 then transmits the encapsulated data segment to the appropriate client device 106 along the existing connection between the client device 106 and the server 102 (Block 412).


As shown in FIG. 4, the process then proceeds as to whether there are other response data segments that need to processed and sent back to the client device 106 (Block 414). If not, the process ends at the End Block. Otherwise, the process proceeds to Block 414 to process and load balance other data segments in. For example, for a response that is segmented into twenty (20) data segments, the value “n” would be 20, whereby the network traffic management device 110 would process 19 other data segments after processing the first data segment. In the example in FIG. 4, the process continues to Block 416 where the “n” value is incremented by 1 to identify the next data segment to be processed (e.g. data segment i2). It should be noted that although FIG. 4 indicates that each data segment is processed and transmitted sequentially, it is contemplated that the network traffic management device 110 may be able to perform the process on the more than one data segment simultaneously.


Having thus described the basic concepts, it will be rather apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing detailed disclosure is intended to be presented by way of example only, and is not limiting. Various alterations, improvements, and modifications will occur and are intended to those skilled in the art, though not expressly stated herein. These alterations, improvements, and modifications are intended to be suggested hereby, and are within the spirit and scope of the examples. Additionally, the recited order of processing elements or sequences, or the use of numbers, letters, or other designations therefore, is not intended to limit the claimed processes to any order except as may be specified in the claims. Accordingly, the invention is limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereto.

Claims
  • 1. A method for message based load balancing comprising: receiving, by a network traffic management device, an encapsulated request from a client device to a server for an established session, wherein the encapsulated request is encapsulated in accordance with a connection-oriented protocol;segmenting, by the network traffic management device, the encapsulated request into a plurality of encapsulated data segments in accordance with a message boundary parameter;extracting, by the network traffic management device, identifying information of a payload data packet of an encapsulated data segment of the plurality of encapsulated data segments, the identifying information comprising a session identifier for the established session;converting, by the network traffic management device, the payload data packet into a connection-less protocol datagram;performing, by the network traffic management device, a message-based load balancing decision on the connection-less protocol datagram to assign the connection-less protocol datagram to a server based on the message-based load balancing decision;converting, by the network traffic management device, the connection-less protocol datagram into an encapsulated data packet, wherein the data packet is encapsulated in accordance with a second connection-oriented protocol; andsending, by the network traffic management device, the encapsulated data packet from a virtual server to the server based on the message-based load balancing decision, wherein the session identifier is used to establish a connection between the virtual server and the server when a connection has not already been established.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: extracting, by the network traffic management device, identifying information of a second payload data packet of a second encapsulated data segment associated with the encapsulated request;converting, by the network traffic management device, the second payload data packet into a second connection-less protocol datagram at the network traffic management device;performing, by the network traffic management device, the message-based load balancing decision on the second connection-less protocol datagram at the network traffic management device, wherein the connection-less protocol datagram is assigned to be sent to a second server based on the message-based load balancing decision;converting, by the network traffic management device, the second connection-less protocol datagram into a second encapsulated data packet, wherein the data packet is encapsulated in accordance with the second connection-oriented protocol; andsending, by the network traffic management device, the second encapsulated data packet from a second virtual server to a dedicated second server based on the message-based load balancing decision.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: de-encapsulating, by the network traffic management device, the connection-oriented encapsulated data segment, wherein the de-encapsulated data segment comprises the payload data or a key information code.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the converting the payload data packet into the connection-less protocol datagram further comprises: encapsulating, by the network traffic management device, the payload data in accordance with the connection-less protocol.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the connection-oriented protocol is a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the second connection-oriented protocol is a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the connection-less protocol is a User Datagram Protocol (UDP).
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the converting of the connection-less protocol datagram into the encapsulated data packet further comprises: de-encapsulating, by the network traffic management device, the connection-less protocol datagram;encapsulating, by the network traffic management device, the payload data packet into the encapsulated data packet, wherein the encapsulated data packet at least contains information identifying the virtual server as the source of transmission of the encapsulated data packet.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, by the network traffic management device, an encapsulated response from the server for the established session, the response corresponding to the encapsulated data packet sent from the virtual server, wherein the response is encapsulated in accordance with the second connection-oriented protocol;segmenting, by the network traffic management device, the encapsulated response into a plurality of encapsulated response data segments in accordance with the message boundary parameter;extracting, by the network traffic management device, identifying information of a response payload data packet of a encapsulated response data segment of the plurality of encapsulated response data segments;performing, by the network traffic management device, the message-based load balancing decision on the response payload data packet to identify the session and the client device where the response payload data packet is to transmitted;converting, by the network traffic management device, the response payload data packet into the connection-less protocol datagram, wherein the connection-less protocol datagram is configured with information associated with the session between the client device and the server;converting, by the network traffic management device, the connection-less protocol datagram into a second encapsulated response data packet, wherein the second encapsulated response data packet is encapsulated in accordance with the connection-oriented protocol; andsending, by the network traffic management device, the second encapsulated response data to the client device based on the message-based load balancing decision.
  • 10. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for message based load balancing, comprising machine executable code which when executed by at least one processor causes the processor to perform steps comprising: receiving an encapsulated request from a client device to a server for an established session, wherein the encapsulated request is encapsulated in accordance with a connection-oriented protocol;segmenting the encapsulated request into a plurality of encapsulated data segments in accordance with a message boundary parameter;extracting identifying information of a payload data packet of an encapsulated data segment of the plurality of encapsulated data segments, the identifying information comprising a session identifier for the established session;converting the payload data packet into a connection-less protocol datagram;performing a message-based load balancing decision on the connection-less protocol datagram, wherein the connection-less protocol datagram is assigned to be sent to a server via a virtual server based on the message-based load balancing decision;converting the connection-less protocol datagram into an encapsulated data packet, wherein the data packet is encapsulated in accordance with a second connection-oriented protocol; andsending the encapsulated data packet from the virtual server to the server based on the message-based load balancing decision, wherein the session identifier is used to establish a connection between the virtual server and the server when a connection has not already been established.
  • 11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, further having stored thereon instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to perform steps further comprising: extracting identifying information of a second payload data packet of a second encapsulated data segment associated with the encapsulated request;converting the second payload data packet into a second connection-less protocol datagram;performing a message-based load balancing decision on the second connection-less protocol datagram, wherein the connection-less protocol datagram is assigned to be sent to a second server based on the message-based load balancing decision;converting the second connection-less protocol datagram into a second encapsulated data packet, wherein the data packet is encapsulated in accordance with the second connection-oriented protocol; andsending the second encapsulated data packet from a second virtual server to a dedicated second server based on the message-based load balancing decision.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, further having stored thereon instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to perform steps further comprising: de-encapsulating the connection-oriented encapsulated data segment, wherein the de-encapsulated data segment comprises at least the payload data or a key information code.
  • 13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, further having stored thereon instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to perform steps further comprising: encapsulating the payload data in accordance with the connection-less protocol.
  • 14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the connection-oriented protocol is a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
  • 15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the second connection-oriented protocol is a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
  • 16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the connection-less protocol is a User Datagram Protocol (UDP).
  • 17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the converting of the connection-less protocol datagram into the encapsulated data packet further comprises: de-encapsulating the connection-less protocol datagram; andencapsulating the payload data packet into the encapsulated data packet, wherein the encapsulated data packet at least contains information identifying the virtual server as the source of transmission of the encapsulated data packet.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, further having stored thereon instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to perform steps further comprising: receiving an encapsulated response from the server for the established session, the response corresponding to the encapsulated data packet sent from the virtual server, wherein the response is encapsulated in accordance with the second connection-oriented protocol;segmenting the encapsulated response into a plurality of encapsulated response data segments in accordance with the message boundary parameter;extracting identifying information of a response payload data packet of a encapsulated response data segment of the plurality of encapsulated response data segments;performing the message-based load balancing decision on the response payload data packet to identify the session and the client device where the response payload data packet is to transmitted;converting the response payload data packet into the connection-less protocol datagram, wherein the connection-less protocol datagram is configured with information associated with the session between the client device and the server;converting the connection-less protocol datagram into a second encapsulated response data packet, wherein the second encapsulated response data packet is encapsulated in accordance with the connection-oriented protocol; andsending the second encapsulated response data to the client device based on the message-based load balancing decision.
  • 19. A network traffic management device comprising: a network interface coupled to a client device and one or more servers via a network, the network interface capable of receiving a request from the client device requesting access to the one or more servers;at least one processor;a memory coupled to the at least one processor and configured to be capable of executing programmed instructions, which comprise the programmed instructions stored in the memory to: receive an encapsulated request from a client device to a server for an established session, wherein the encapsulated request is encapsulated in accordance with a connection-oriented protocol;segment the encapsulated request into a plurality of encapsulated data segments in accordance with a message boundary parameter;extract identifying information of a payload data packet of an encapsulated data segment of the plurality of encapsulated data segments, the identifying information comprising a session identifier for the established session;convert the payload data packet into a connection-less protocol datagram;perform a message-based load balancing decision on the connection-less protocol datagram, wherein the connection-less protocol datagram is assigned to be sent to a server via a virtual server based on the message based load balancing decision:convert the connection-less protocol datagram into an encapsulated data packet, wherein the encapsulated data packet is encapsulated in accordance with a second connection-oriented protocol; andsend the encapsulated data packet from the virtual server to the server based on the message-based load balancing decision, wherein the session identifier is used to establish a connection between the virtual server and the server when a connection has not already been established.
  • 20. The network traffic management device of claim 19, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to be capable of executing programmed instructions, which comprise the programmed instructions stored in the memory to: extract identifying information of a second payload data packet of a second encapsulated data segment associated with the encapsulated request;convert the second payload data packet into a second connection-less protocol datagram;perform a message-based load balancing decision on the second connection-less protocol datagram, wherein the connection-less protocol datagram is assigned to be sent to a second server based on the message-based load balancing decision;convert the second connection-less protocol datagram into a second encapsulated data packet, wherein the data packet is encapsulated in accordance with the second connection-oriented protocol; andsend the second encapsulated data packet from a second virtual server to a dedicated second server based on the message-based load balancing decision.
  • 21. The network traffic management device of claim 19, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to be capable of executing programmed instructions, which comprise the programmed instructions stored in the memory to: de-encapsulate the connection-oriented encapsulated data segment, wherein the de-encapsulated data segment comprises at least the payload data or a key information code.
  • 22. The network traffic management device of claim 19, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to be capable of executing programmed instructions, which comprise the programmed instructions stored in the memory to: encapsulate the payload data in accordance with the connection-less protocol.
  • 23. The network traffic management device of claim 19, wherein the connection-oriented protocol is a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
  • 24. The network traffic management device of claim 19, wherein the second connection-oriented protocol is a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
  • 25. The network traffic management device of claim 19, wherein the connection-less protocol is a User Datagram Protocol (UDP).
  • 26. The network traffic management device of claim 19, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to be capable of executing programmed instructions, which comprise the programmed instructions for the conversion of the connection-less protocol datagram into the encapsulated data packet stored in the memory to: de-encapsulate the connection-less protocol datagram; andencapsulate the payload data packet into the encapsulated data packet, wherein the encapsulated data packet at least contains information identifying the virtual server as the source of transmission of the encapsulated data packet.
  • 27. The network traffic management device of claim 19, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to be capable of executing programmed instructions, which comprise the programmed instructions stored in the memory to: receive an encapsulated response from the server for the established session, the response corresponding to the encapsulated data packet sent from the virtual server, wherein the response is encapsulated in accordance with the second connection-oriented protocol;segment the encapsulated response into a plurality of encapsulated response data segments in accordance with the message boundary parameter;extract identifying information of a response payload data packet of a encapsulated response data segment of the plurality of encapsulated response data segments;perform the message-based load balancing decision on the response payload data packet to identify the session and the client device where the response payload data packet is to transmitted;convert the response payload data packet into the connection-less protocol datagram, wherein the connection-less protocol datagram is configured with information associated with the session between the client device and the server;convert the connection-less protocol datagram into a second encapsulated response data packet, wherein the second encapsulated response data packet is encapsulated in accordance with the connection-oriented protocol; andsend the second encapsulated response data to the client device based on the message-based load balancing decision.
US Referenced Citations (336)
Number Name Date Kind
3950735 Patel Apr 1976 A
4644532 George et al. Feb 1987 A
4897781 Chang et al. Jan 1990 A
4965772 Daniel et al. Oct 1990 A
5023826 Patel Jun 1991 A
5053953 Patel Oct 1991 A
5167024 Smith et al. Nov 1992 A
5299312 Rocco, Jr. Mar 1994 A
5327529 Fults et al. Jul 1994 A
5367635 Bauer et al. Nov 1994 A
5371852 Attanasio et al. Dec 1994 A
5406502 Haramaty et al. Apr 1995 A
5475857 Dally Dec 1995 A
5517617 Sathaye et al. May 1996 A
5519694 Brewer et al. May 1996 A
5519778 Leighton et al. May 1996 A
5521591 Arora et al. May 1996 A
5528701 Aref Jun 1996 A
5581764 Fitzgerald et al. Dec 1996 A
5596742 Agarwal et al. Jan 1997 A
5606665 Yang et al. Feb 1997 A
5611049 Pitts Mar 1997 A
5663018 Cummings et al. Sep 1997 A
5752023 Choucri et al. May 1998 A
5761484 Agarwal et al. Jun 1998 A
5768423 Aref et al. Jun 1998 A
5774660 Brendel et al. Jun 1998 A
5790554 Pitcher et al. Aug 1998 A
5802052 Venkataraman Sep 1998 A
5812550 Sohn et al. Sep 1998 A
5825772 Dobbins et al. Oct 1998 A
5832283 Chou et al. Nov 1998 A
5875296 Shi et al. Feb 1999 A
5892914 Pitts Apr 1999 A
5892932 Kim Apr 1999 A
5919247 Van Hoff et al. Jul 1999 A
5936939 Des Jardins et al. Aug 1999 A
5941988 Bhagwat et al. Aug 1999 A
5946690 Pitts Aug 1999 A
5949885 Leighton Sep 1999 A
5951694 Choquier et al. Sep 1999 A
5959990 Frantz et al. Sep 1999 A
5974460 Maddalozzo, Jr. et al. Oct 1999 A
5983281 Ogle Nov 1999 A
5988847 McLaughlin et al. Nov 1999 A
6006260 Barrick, Jr. et al. Dec 1999 A
6006264 Colby Dec 1999 A
6026452 Pitts Feb 2000 A
6028857 Poor Feb 2000 A
6051169 Brown et al. Apr 2000 A
6078956 Bryant et al. Jun 2000 A
6085234 Pitts et al. Jul 2000 A
6092196 Reiche Jul 2000 A
6108703 Leighton et al. Aug 2000 A
6111876 Frantz et al. Aug 2000 A
6128279 O'Neil et al. Oct 2000 A
6128657 Okanoya Oct 2000 A
6160874 Dickerman Dec 2000 A
6170022 Linville et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178423 Douceur et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182139 Brendel Jan 2001 B1
6192051 Lipman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6233612 Fruchtman et al. May 2001 B1
6246684 Chapman et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253226 Chidambaran et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253230 Couland et al. Jun 2001 B1
6263368 Martin Jul 2001 B1
6289012 Harrington et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298380 Coile et al. Oct 2001 B1
6327622 Jindal et al. Dec 2001 B1
6343324 Hubis et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347339 Morris et al. Feb 2002 B1
6360270 Cherkasova et al. Mar 2002 B1
6374300 Masters Apr 2002 B2
6396833 Zhang et al. May 2002 B1
6430562 Kardos et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434081 Johnson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6480476 Willars Nov 2002 B1
6484261 Wiegel Nov 2002 B1
6490624 Sampson et al. Dec 2002 B1
6510135 Almulhem et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510458 Berstis et al. Jan 2003 B1
6519643 Foulkes et al. Feb 2003 B1
6601084 Bhaskaran Jul 2003 B1
6636503 Shiran et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636894 Short et al. Oct 2003 B1
6650640 Muller et al. Nov 2003 B1
6650641 Albert Nov 2003 B1
6654701 Hatley Nov 2003 B2
6683873 Kwok et al. Jan 2004 B1
6691165 Bruck et al. Feb 2004 B1
6694517 James et al. Feb 2004 B1
6708187 Shanumgam et al. Mar 2004 B1
6718380 Mohaban et al. Apr 2004 B1
6742045 Albert May 2004 B1
6751663 Farrell et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754228 Ludwig Jun 2004 B1
6760775 Anerousis et al. Jul 2004 B1
6772219 Shobatake Aug 2004 B1
6779039 Bommareddy et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781986 Sabaa et al. Aug 2004 B1
6798777 Ferguson et al. Sep 2004 B1
6804542 Haartsen Oct 2004 B1
6816901 Sitaraman et al. Nov 2004 B1
6816977 Brakmo et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829238 Tokuyo et al. Dec 2004 B2
6868082 Allen, Jr. et al. Mar 2005 B1
6876629 Beshai et al. Apr 2005 B2
6876654 Hegde Apr 2005 B1
6888836 Cherkasova May 2005 B1
6928082 Liu et al. Aug 2005 B2
6947985 Hegli et al. Sep 2005 B2
6950434 Viswanath et al. Sep 2005 B1
6954780 Susai et al. Oct 2005 B2
6957272 Tallegas et al. Oct 2005 B2
6959394 Brickell et al. Oct 2005 B1
6975592 Seddigh et al. Dec 2005 B1
6987763 Rochberger et al. Jan 2006 B2
7007092 Peiffer Feb 2006 B2
7113993 Cappiello et al. Sep 2006 B1
7133944 Song et al. Nov 2006 B2
7139792 Mishra et al. Nov 2006 B1
7228422 Morioka et al. Jun 2007 B2
7283470 Sindhu et al. Oct 2007 B1
7287082 O'Toole, Jr. Oct 2007 B1
7295827 Liu et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308703 Wright et al. Dec 2007 B2
7321926 Zhang et al. Jan 2008 B1
7333999 Njemanze Feb 2008 B1
7343413 Gilde et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349391 Ben-Dor et al. Mar 2008 B2
7398552 Pardee et al. Jul 2008 B2
7433962 Janssen et al. Oct 2008 B2
7454480 Labio et al. Nov 2008 B2
7490162 Masters Feb 2009 B1
7500243 Huetsch et al. Mar 2009 B2
7500269 Huotari et al. Mar 2009 B2
7505795 Lim et al. Mar 2009 B1
7516492 Nisbet et al. Apr 2009 B1
7526541 Roese et al. Apr 2009 B2
7558197 Sindhu et al. Jul 2009 B1
7580971 Gollapudi et al. Aug 2009 B1
7624424 Morita et al. Nov 2009 B2
7644137 Bozak et al. Jan 2010 B2
7668166 Rekhter et al. Feb 2010 B1
7706261 Sun et al. Apr 2010 B2
7724657 Rao et al. May 2010 B2
7725093 Sengupta et al. May 2010 B2
7778187 Chaturvedi et al. Aug 2010 B2
7801978 Susai et al. Sep 2010 B1
7831662 Clark et al. Nov 2010 B2
7876677 Cheshire Jan 2011 B2
7908314 Yamaguchi et al. Mar 2011 B2
7925908 Kim Apr 2011 B2
7933946 Livshits et al. Apr 2011 B2
7945908 Waldspurger et al. May 2011 B1
7984141 Gupta et al. Jul 2011 B2
8130650 Allen, Jr. et al. Mar 2012 B2
8199757 Pani et al. Jun 2012 B2
8351333 Rao Jan 2013 B2
8380854 Szabo Feb 2013 B2
8447871 Szabo May 2013 B1
8464265 Worley Jun 2013 B2
8606921 Vasquez et al. Dec 2013 B2
8615022 Harrison Dec 2013 B2
8665868 Kay Mar 2014 B2
8701179 Penno et al. Apr 2014 B1
8778665 Glide et al. Jul 2014 B2
8804504 Chen Aug 2014 B1
8830874 Cho et al. Sep 2014 B2
9036529 Erickson May 2015 B2
20010009554 Katseff Jul 2001 A1
20010023442 Masters Sep 2001 A1
20020046291 O'Callaghan Apr 2002 A1
20020049842 Huetsch et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020059428 Susai et al. May 2002 A1
20020083067 Tamayo et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020095498 Chanda Jul 2002 A1
20020138615 Schmeling Sep 2002 A1
20020161913 Gonzalez et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020194342 Lu et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198993 Cudd et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030046291 Fascenda Mar 2003 A1
20030065653 Overton Apr 2003 A1
20030065951 Igeta et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069918 Lu Apr 2003 A1
20030069974 Lu et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070069 Belapurkar et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030086415 Bernhard et al. May 2003 A1
20030105983 Brakmo et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030108052 Inoue Jun 2003 A1
20030128708 Inoue Jul 2003 A1
20030145062 Sharma et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145233 Poletto et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030163576 Janssen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030208596 Carolan Nov 2003 A1
20030225485 Fritz et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003287 Zissimopoulos et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040072569 Omae Apr 2004 A1
20040103283 Hornak May 2004 A1
20040111523 Hall Jun 2004 A1
20040111621 Himberger et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117493 Bazot et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040151186 Akama Aug 2004 A1
20040210663 Phillips Oct 2004 A1
20040255000 Simionescu Dec 2004 A1
20040264472 Oliver Dec 2004 A1
20040264481 Darling Dec 2004 A1
20040267920 Hydrie Dec 2004 A1
20040267948 Oliver Dec 2004 A1
20040268358 Darling Dec 2004 A1
20050004887 Igakura et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021736 Carusi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027869 Johnson Feb 2005 A1
20050044213 Kobayashi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050052440 Kim et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055435 Gbadegesin Mar 2005 A1
20050071283 Randle Mar 2005 A1
20050078604 Yim Apr 2005 A1
20050122977 Lieberman Jun 2005 A1
20050154837 Keohane et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050187866 Lee Aug 2005 A1
20050188220 Nilsson et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198310 Kim Sep 2005 A1
20050262238 Reeves et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050288939 Peled Dec 2005 A1
20060031520 Bedekar et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060059267 Cugi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060077902 Kannan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060083205 Buddhikot Apr 2006 A1
20060112176 Liu May 2006 A1
20060112272 Morioka May 2006 A1
20060129684 Datta Jun 2006 A1
20060135198 Lee Jun 2006 A1
20060156416 Huotari et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161577 Kulkarni Jul 2006 A1
20060168070 Thompson Jul 2006 A1
20060171365 Borella Aug 2006 A1
20060179153 Lee Aug 2006 A1
20060182103 Martini Aug 2006 A1
20060209853 Hidaka Sep 2006 A1
20060230148 Forecast Oct 2006 A1
20060233106 Achlioptas et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242300 Yumoto Oct 2006 A1
20060291483 Sela Dec 2006 A1
20070006293 Balakrishnan Jan 2007 A1
20070016662 Desai Jan 2007 A1
20070019658 Park Jan 2007 A1
20070050843 Manville Mar 2007 A1
20070058670 Konduru Mar 2007 A1
20070064661 Sood et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083646 Miller et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088822 Coile Apr 2007 A1
20070106796 Kudo et al. May 2007 A1
20070107048 Halls et al. May 2007 A1
20070118879 Yeun May 2007 A1
20070174491 Still et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070220598 Salowey et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233809 Brownell Oct 2007 A1
20070258451 Bouat Nov 2007 A1
20070297410 Yoon et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070297551 Choi Dec 2007 A1
20080008202 Terrell Jan 2008 A1
20080025297 Kashyap Jan 2008 A1
20080034136 Ulenas Feb 2008 A1
20080072303 Syed Mar 2008 A1
20080120370 Chan May 2008 A1
20080133518 Kapoor et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080134311 Medvinsky et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080148340 Powell et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159145 Muthukrishnan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080165801 Sheppard Jul 2008 A1
20080178278 Grinstein et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201599 Ferraiolo et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080205613 Lopez Aug 2008 A1
20080222646 Sigal et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080225710 Raja Sep 2008 A1
20080229415 Kapoor Sep 2008 A1
20080239986 Xu Oct 2008 A1
20080253395 Pandya Oct 2008 A1
20080256224 Kaji et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080288661 Galles Nov 2008 A1
20080301760 Lim Dec 2008 A1
20080316922 Riddle Dec 2008 A1
20090028337 Balabine et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090049230 Pandya Feb 2009 A1
20090070617 Arimilli et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090077619 Boyce Mar 2009 A1
20090094610 Sukirya Apr 2009 A1
20090119504 van Os et al. May 2009 A1
20090125496 Wexler et al. May 2009 A1
20090125532 Wexler et al. May 2009 A1
20090125625 Shim May 2009 A1
20090138749 Moll et al. May 2009 A1
20090141891 Boyen et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090157678 Turk Jun 2009 A1
20090196282 Fellman et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090228956 He et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090287935 Aull et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090296624 Ryu Dec 2009 A1
20090300407 Kamath Dec 2009 A1
20100011434 Kay Jan 2010 A1
20100017846 Huang et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023582 Pedersen et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100071048 Novak et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100115236 Bataineh et al. May 2010 A1
20100122091 Huang et al. May 2010 A1
20100150154 Viger et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100165877 Shukla et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100242092 Harris et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100251330 Kroeselberg et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100279733 Karsten Nov 2010 A1
20100322250 Shetty et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325277 Muthiah et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110040889 Garrett et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047620 Mahaffey et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110066718 Susai et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110153822 Rajan et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110154443 Thakur Jun 2011 A1
20110173295 Bakke et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184733 Yu Jul 2011 A1
20110246800 Accpadi et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110273984 Hsu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282997 Prince et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110321122 Mwangi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120016994 Nakamura et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120039341 Latif Feb 2012 A1
20120041965 Vasquez Feb 2012 A1
20120063314 Pignataro Mar 2012 A1
20120066489 Ozaki et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120101952 Raleigh et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120311153 Morgan Dec 2012 A1
20120317266 Abbott Dec 2012 A1
20130336122 Baruah Dec 2013 A1
20140040478 Hsu et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140095661 Knowles et al. Apr 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
0744850 Nov 1996 EP
9114326 Sep 1991 WO
9505712 Feb 1995 WO
9905829 Feb 1997 WO
9709805 Mar 1997 WO
9745800 Dec 1997 WO
9906913 Feb 1999 WO
9910858 Mar 1999 WO
9939373 Aug 1999 WO
9964967 Dec 1999 WO
0004422 Jan 2000 WO
0004458 Jan 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (21)
Entry
Crescendo Networks, “Application Layer Processing (ALP),” 2003-2009, pp. 168-186, Chapter 9, CN-5000E/5500E, Foxit Software Company.
“A Process for Selective Routing of Servlet Content to Transcoding Modules,” Research Disclosure 422124, Jun. 1999, pp. 889-890, IBM Corporation.
“Big-IP Controller with Exclusive OneConnect Content Switching Feature Provides a Breakthrough System for Maximizing Server and Network Performance,” F5 Networks, Inc. Press Release, May 8, 2001, 2 pages, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1,” Network Working Group, RFC: 2068, Jan. 1997, pp. 1-162.
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1,” Network Working Group, RFC: 2616, Jun. 1999, pp. 1-176.
Floyd et al., “Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance,” Aug. 1993, pp. 1-22, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, California.
Hochmuth, Phil, “F5, CacheFlow pump up content-delivery lines,” Network World Fusion, May 4, 2001, 1 page, Las Vegas, Nevada.
“Servlet/Applet/HTML Authentication Process With Single Sign-On,” Research Disclosure 429128, Jan. 2000, pp. 163-164, IBM Corporation.
“Traffic Surges; Surge Queue; Netscaler Defense,” 2005, PowerPoint Presentation, slides 1-12, Citrix Systems, Inc.
MacVittie, Lori, “Message-Based Load Balancing,” Technical Brief, Jan. 2010, pp. 1-9, F5 Networks, Inc.
Abad, C., et al., “An Analysis on the Schemes for Detecting and Preventing ARP Cache Poisoning Attacks”, IEEE, Computer Society, 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW'07), 2007, pp. 1-8.
OWASP, “Testing for Cross site scripting”, OWASP Testing Guide v2, Table of Contents, Feb. 24, 2011, pp. 1-5, (www.owasp.org/index.php/Testing—for—Cross—site—scripting).
International Search Report and the Written Opinion, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/026615, Date of Mailing: Jul. 4, 2013.
F5 Networks Inc., “Configuration Guide for Local Traffic Management,” F5 Networks Inc., Jan. 2006, version 9.2.2, 406 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/400,398 to Paul Jiang, filed Feb. 20, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,042 to Baumann et al., filed Sep. 15, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,047 to Wojcik et al., filed Sep. 15, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/822,146 to Jeff Costlow, filed Jun. 23, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/235,276 to Hawthorne et al., filed Sep. 16, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,031 to Baumann et al., filed Sep. 15, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/165,783 to Jain et al., filed Jun. 21, 2011.