This technology generally relates to network traffic management, and more particularly, to a system and method for performing message-based load balancing.
Load balancing has been integral to providing high availability and scalability to web-based and non web-based applications. However, the type of protocol used in network communications between the client devices and the servers affect the ability to effectively handle load balancing. The HTTP protocol, for example, is synchronous and stateless, whereas other protocols such as Diameter, RADIUS, and Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) are asynchronous and do not adhere to a single request-reply communication sequence. The use of such asynchronous protocols makes it difficult to perform load balancing, because most load balancing systems are designed to operate in a synchronous messaging environment where a single request is made and responded to before another is processed.
Asynchronous protocols such as Diameter and SIP also maintain the one-to-one (1:1) relationship in which there is always a matching reply for every request. However, unlike traditional web-based protocols, they do not need to maintain a strict synchronous exchange. In other words, multiple requests may be sent before a reply is received in an asynchronous protocol. This makes load balancing systems that use traditional protocols, like HTTP or TCP, unable to handle load balancing responsibilities as they cannot process more than one request at a time and are limited to load balancing on a per-connection basis.
Load balancing is accomplished in typical systems at the Layer 4 (TCP) protocol on a per-session or per-connection basis. All requests received over the same session are load balanced to the same server. When communications are complete, the session is terminated. This behavior is not acceptable for some protocols, particularly those associated with service provider and telecommunications implementations that utilize SIP, Diameter, Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and RADIUS protocols. These protocols carry communications over longer-lived sessions, whereby the communications are potentially required to be processed by different servers. This means traditional load balancing mechanisms are incapable of supporting the scalability and availability requirements of such protocols.
In a typical synchronous request-reply protocol, such as TCP, each request can be directed to a specific server based on a variety of parameters, such as the content or request type. This behavior is also desirable in message-oriented communication, but it is typically more difficult to support for SIP, RADIUS and Diameter protocols due to the need to scale intermediaries to open and maintain multiple connections to different servers. As stated above, traditional TCP based load balancing maintains a 1:1 ratio between requests and server-side connections. However, in a message-oriented protocol such as SIP or Diameter, there may be a need to maintain a one-to-many (1:N) ratio between requests and server-side connections. One way to solve the challenges associated with scaling message oriented protocols such as SIP and Diameter is the ability to extract individual messages out of a single, shared TCP connection.
What is needed is a system and method that is configured to inspect application layer data in split out individual messages from a connection-oriented protocol and distribute them appropriately to different servers using a connection-less protocol.
In an aspect, a method for message based load balancing comprises receiving, at a network traffic management device, an encapsulated request from a client device to a destination server for an established session, wherein the request is encapsulated in accordance with a first connection-oriented protocol. The method includes segmenting the encapsulated message into a plurality of encapsulated data segments in accordance with a message boundary parameter. The method includes extracting identifying information of a first payload data packet of a first encapsulated data segment. The method includes converting the first payload data packet into a first connection-less protocol datagram at the network traffic management device. The method includes performing a message-based load balancing decision on the first connection-less protocol datagram at the network traffic management device to assign the first connection-less protocol to a first server based on the message-based load balancing decision. The method includes converting, via the network traffic management device, the first connection-less protocol datagram into a first encapsulated data packet, wherein the data packet is encapsulated in accordance with a second connection-oriented protocol. The method includes sending the first encapsulated data packet from a first virtual server to the first server based on the message-based load balancing decision.
In an aspect, a non-transitory machine readable medium having stored thereon instructions message based load balancing. The medium comprises machine executable code which when executed by at least one machine associated with a network traffic management device, causes the machine to receive an encapsulated request from a client device to a destination server for an established session, wherein the request is encapsulated in accordance with a first connection-oriented protocol. The machine segments the encapsulated message into a plurality of encapsulated data segments in accordance with a message boundary parameter. The machine extracts identifying information of a first payload data packet of a first encapsulated data segment. The machine converts the first payload data packet into a first connection-less protocol datagram. The machine performs a message-based load balancing decision on the first connection-less protocol datagram, wherein the first connection-less protocol datagram is assigned to be sent to a first server via a first virtual server based on the message-based load balancing decision. The machine converts the first connection-less protocol datagram into a first encapsulated data packet, wherein the data packet is encapsulated in accordance with a second connection-oriented protocol. The machine sends the first encapsulated data packet from the first virtual server to the first server based on the message-based load balancing decision.
In an aspect, a network traffic management device for protocol conversions in policy changing enforcement comprises a network interface coupled to a client device and one or more servers via a network. The network interface receives a request from the client device requesting access to the server. The network traffic management device includes a processor coupled to the network interface. The processor is operative to receive an encapsulated request from a client device to a destination server for an established session, wherein the request is encapsulated in accordance with a first connection-oriented protocol. The processor is operative to segment the encapsulated message into a plurality of encapsulated data segments in accordance with a message boundary parameter. The processor is operative to extract identifying information of a first payload data packet of a first encapsulated data segment. The processor is operative to convert the first payload data packet into a first connection-less protocol datagram. The processor is operative to perform a message-based load balancing decision on the first connection-less protocol datagram, wherein the first connection-less protocol datagram is assigned to be sent to a first server via a first virtual server based on the message-based load balancing decision. The processor is operative to convert the first connection-less protocol datagram into a first encapsulated data packet, wherein the data packet is encapsulated in accordance with a second connection-oriented protocol. The processor is operative to send the first encapsulated data packet from the first virtual server to the first server based on the message-based load balancing decision.
While these examples are susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail preferred examples with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification and is not intended to limit the broad aspect to the embodiments illustrated.
Client devices 106 comprise network devices capable of connecting to other computing devices, such as the network traffic management device 110 and the server 102. Such connections are performed over wired and/or wireless networks, such as network 108, to send and receive data, such as for Web-based and/or non Web-based requests, receiving responses to requests and/or performing other tasks. Non-limiting and non-exhausting examples of such client devices include personal computers (e.g., desktops, laptops, tablets), smart televisions, stand alone multimedia devices, mobile and/or smart phones and the like. In an example, client devices 106 can run Web browsers that may provide an interface for operators, such as human users, to interact with for making requests for resources to different web server-based applications or Web pages via the network 108, although other server resources may be requested by clients. One or more Web-based applications may run on a web application server 102 that provide the requested data back to one or more network devices, such as client devices 106.
The server 102 comprises one or more server computing machines capable of operating one or more Web-based and/or non Web-based applications that may be accessed by other network devices in the network 108. Such network devices include client devices 106, the network traffic management device 110, and the like. The server 102 may provide data representing requested resources, such as particular Web page(s), image(s) of physical objects, and any other objects, responsive to the requests received from the client device 106. It should be noted that the server 102 may perform other tasks and provide other types of resources. It should be noted that while only two servers 102 are shown in the environment 100 depicted in
Network 108 comprises a publicly accessible network, such as the Internet, which allows communications to and from client devices 106. However, it is contemplated that the network 108 may comprise other types of private and public networks that include other devices. Communications, such as requests from clients 106 and responses from servers 102, take place over the network 108 according to standard network protocols, such as the HTTP and TCP/IP protocols in this example. However, the principles discussed herein are not limited to this example and can include other protocols. Further, it should be appreciated that network 108 may include local area networks (LANs), wide area networks (WANs), direct connections and any combination thereof, as well as other types and numbers of network types. On an interconnected set of LANs or other networks, including those based on differing architectures and protocols, routers, switches, hubs, gateways, bridges, cell towers and other intermediate network devices may act as links within and between LANs and other networks to enable messages and other data to be sent from and to network devices. Also, communication links within and between LANs and other networks typically include twisted wire pair (e.g., Ethernet), coaxial cable, analog telephone lines, full or fractional dedicated digital lines including T1, T2, T3, and T4, Integrated Services Digital Networks (ISDNs), Digital Subscriber Lines (DSLs), wireless links including satellite links and other communications links known to those skilled in the relevant arts. In essence, the network 108 includes any communication method by which data may travel between the client devices 106, the servers 102 and the network traffic management device 110, and the like.
LAN 104 comprises a private local area network that includes the network traffic management device 110 coupled to the one or more servers 102, although the LAN 104 may comprise other types of private and public networks with other devices. Networks, including local area networks, besides being understood by those skilled in the relevant arts, have already been generally described above in connection with network 108 and thus will not be described further.
As per the TCP/IP protocols, requests from the requesting client devices 106 may be sent as one or more streams of messages which include data packets over the network 108 to the network traffic management device 110 and/or the servers 102. Such Layer 4 protocols can establish connections, send and receive data for existing connections, and the like. It is to be understood that the one or more servers 102 may be hardware and/or software, and/or may represent a system with multiple servers that may include internal or external networks. In this example, the servers 102 may be any version of Microsoft® IIS servers, RADIUS servers, DIAMETER servers and/or Apache® servers, although other types of servers may be used. Further, additional servers may be coupled to the network 108 and many different types of applications may be available on servers coupled to the network 108.
As shown in the example environment 100 depicted in
Generally, the network traffic management device 110 manages network communications, which may include one or more client requests and server responses, from/to the network 108 between the client devices 106 and one or more of the servers 102 in LAN 104. These requests and responses are sent between one or more client devices 106 and one or more servers 102 in the form of one or more TCP/IP data packets. The requests pass through one or more intermediate network devices and/or intermediate networks, until they ultimately reach the network traffic management device 110. In any case, the network traffic management device 110 may manage the network communications by performing several network traffic related functions involving the communications. Such functions include load balancing, access control, protocol conversion, segmentation of packets, and the like.
Device processor 200 comprises one or more microprocessors configured to execute computer/machine readable and executable instructions stored in device memory 214, and in particular the load balancing module 210 and the conversion module 212. Such instructions implement network traffic management related functions of the network traffic management device 110. In addition, the processor 200, upon executing the software instructions of the load balancing and conversion modules 210, 212, will perform one or more portions of the processes described below in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure.
Device I/O interfaces 202 comprise one or more user input and output device interface mechanisms. The interface may include a computer keyboard, mouse, touch screen, display device, and the corresponding physical ports and underlying supporting hardware and software to enable the network traffic management device 110 to communicate with the outside environment. Such communications may include accepting user data input and to provide user output, although other types and numbers of user input and output devices may be used. Additionally or alternatively, as will be described in connection with network interface 204 below, the network traffic management device 110 may communicate with the outside environment for certain types of operations (e.g., configuration) via a network management port.
Network interface 204 comprises one or more mechanisms that enable network traffic management device 110 to engage in network communications using one or more network protocols (e.g. TCP, HTTP) over LAN 104 and network 108. However, it is contemplated that the network interface 204 may be constructed for use with other communication protocols and types of networks. Network interface 204 is sometimes referred to as a transceiver, transceiving device, or network interface card (NIC), which transmits and receives network data packets to one or more networks, such as LAN 104 and network 108. The network interface 204 is utilized by one or more virtual servers 216, 218, 220 to send and receive encapsulated data packets between the network traffic management device 110 and one or more physical servers 102.
In an example where the network traffic management device 110 includes more than one device processor 200 (or a processor 200 has more than one core), each processor 200 (and/or core) may use the same single network interface 204 or a plurality of network interfaces 204. Further, the network interface 204 may include one or more physical ports, such as Ethernet ports, to couple the network traffic management device 110 with other network devices, such as servers 102. Moreover, the interface 204 may include certain physical ports dedicated to receiving and/or transmitting certain types of network data, such as device management related data for configuring the network traffic management device 110.
Bus 208 may comprise one or more internal device component communication buses, links, bridges and supporting components, such as bus controllers and/or arbiters. The bus enable the various components of the network traffic management device 110, such as the processor 200, device I/O interfaces 202, network interface 204, EAM agent module 210 and device memory 214, to communicate with one another. However, it is contemplated that the bus may enable one or more components of the network traffic management device 110 to communicate with components in other devices as well. Example buses include HyperTransport, PCI, PCI Express, InfiniBand, USB, Firewire, Serial ATA (SATA), SCSI, IDE and AGP buses. However, it is contemplated that other types and numbers of buses may be used, whereby the particular types and arrangement of buses will depend on the particular configuration of the network traffic management device 110.
Device memory 214 comprises non-transitory computer readable media, namely computer readable or processor readable storage media, which are examples of machine-readable storage media. Computer readable storage/machine-readable storage media may include volatile, nonvolatile, removable, and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information. Examples of computer readable storage media include RAM, BIOS, ROM, EEPROM, flash/firmware memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information. Such desired information includes data and/or computer/machine-executable instructions and which can be accessed by one or more processors 200 of the network traffic management device 110.
Such storage media contains computer readable/machine-executable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data, which may be obtained and/or executed by one or more processors, such as device processor 200. Such instructions allow the processor to perform actions, including implementing an operating system for controlling the general operation of network traffic management device 110 to manage network traffic and execute the instructions of the load balancing and conversion modules 210, 212 in relation to the processes described in accordance with the present disclosure.
As shown in
As will be discussed in more detail below, the load balancing module 210 operates in conjunction with the protocol conversion module 212 to allow the network traffic management device 110 to effectively perform the message based load balancing process on any received message. In particular, the protocol conversion module 212 segments the encapsulated data packets and de-encapsulates the data segments to allow the load balancing module 210 to extract specific identifying information of the payload data along with other desired information. The extracted information is processed by the load balancing module 210 to allow it to make message-based load balancing decisions on each data packet. Converting the messages into the connection-less protocol allows the network traffic management device 110 to internally route each data packet to an assigned virtual server 216, 218, 220. The virtual servers 216, 218, 220 operate in conjunction with the network interface 204 as well as the load balancing module 210 and protocol converting module 212 to send and receive load balanced data packets with the physical servers 102.
In particular, each virtual server is configured to establish a connection with its dedicated server 102, via a handshake, that is independent of the original connection established between the client device 106 and the server 102. Once the connection is established, data packets assigned to a respective virtual server will be transmitted from that virtual server to its dedicated server 102. Additionally, response messages from each server are sent back to its dedicated virtual server in the network traffic management device 110. As shown in
As mentioned above, the present system and method utilizes the advantages of a message-based connectionless transmission protocol, such as UDP, to allow message based load balancing logic to be effectively applied to one or more messages. However, considering that the connection that is established between the client devices 110 and the servers 102 are to be in compliance with a connection-oriented protocol, such as TCP, the present system and method ensures that all messages that are sent and received are in compliance with the connection-oriented protocol.
Thus, when the request from the client device 106 is received at the network traffic management device 110, it is received as an encapsulated data message in accordance with a connection-oriented protocol (e.g. TCP) (Block 302). In performing the message-based load balancing process of the present disclosure, the load balancing module 210 of the network traffic management device 110 initially identifies the boundaries of the first or incoming encapsulated data message in accordance with a set boundary parameter and segments the data message into “N” number of data segments (Block 304). The byte sizes defined in the boundary parameter may be set by a network administrator, in an aspect. In an aspect, the network traffic management device 110 may be configured to generate each data segment to have the same byte size in accordance with the defined boundary parameter. In an aspect, the network traffic management device 110 may be configured to segment the data message in a way to have different sized data segments. In either event, the network traffic management device 110 stores the byte sizes of each data segment as this information is eventually used when converting the data segments, as will be discussed in more detail below.
Thereafter, the protocol converting module 212 of the network traffic management device 110 de-encapsulates each data segment in and extracts necessary header information and payload data information (Block 306). In addition the payload data information and other header information, such as Session ID, source IP address and the like, can be extracted from the de-encapsulated data segment.
Additionally, the protocol converting module 212 encapsulates the payload data packet in into a Layer 4 connectionless protocol datagram (Block 306). In an aspect, the protocol converting module 212 encapsulates the payload data packet in into a UDP datagram, although other connectionless transmission protocols are contemplated.
In encapsulating the payload data packet in into the connectionless transmission protocol datagram, the protocol converting module 212 will place, in the header of the datagram, the destination port number of the virtual server which will eventually transmit the data packet to the server, the IP address of the client device 106, the Session ID information as well as the IP address of the server 102 where the payload data packet in is to be sent. Other information which allows successful outbound transmission of the data packet in to the server is also inserted into the header and also stored in the internal memory 214 of the network traffic management device 110.
The load balancing module 210 of the network traffic management device 110 then examines the encapsulated datagram and, in particular, at least a portion of the payload data and key information code. The key information code is used by the load balancing module 210 to perform message-based load balancing logic on the datagram. In performing the load balancing logic, the load balancing module 210 utilizes the key information code to assign an appropriate server 102 where the datagram should be routed (Block 308).
In an example where the request message is sent from the client device using the Diameter protocol, the network traffic management device 110 examines an attribute-value pair (AVP) code in the request. The AVP code will identify one or more specific services related to authentication and authorization of services which need to be performed by a Diameter-based server. In other words, the network traffic management device 110 load balances requests that are based on the Diameter protocol using AVP codes even though the requests are sent over the same long-lived session. Since the sessions are long-lived for network traffic using the Diameter protocol, the load balancing logic employed by the load balancing module 210 is able to maintain connections to multiple servers 102 and thus correctly route requests based on the AVP codes contained within the Diameter messages. For other protocols, such as LDAP, these protocols may contain various information including search base, query string (LDAP filter) which the load balancing module 210 may use as the key information code to decide which server 102 to route the message to.
Subsequent messages received from the client device 106 over the connection with the same key information code will be processed and routed by the load balancing module 210 to the same designated server, although this is not necessary. In contrast, messages received over the same or different connection and containing a different key information code is processed and routed by the load balancing module 210 to a different server 102. The load balancing module 210 of the network traffic management device 110 is thus able to act upon message-level information rather than connection information to perform load balancing logic on the received messages.
After the load balancing module 210 performs the load balancing logic on the datagram and determines which server 102 to route the datagram to, the load balancing module 210, the network traffic management device 110 routes the encapsulated datagram to an assigned virtual server 216, 218, 220 that is dedicated to transmit the datagram to its assigned server 102. As stated above, each virtual server is configured to establish a connection with its dedicated server 102, via a handshake, that is independent of the original connection established between the client device 106 and the server 102.
As shown in
As shown in
In particular, the network traffic management device 110, upon receiving the response message at its respective virtual server, initially segments the data message into “n” number of data segments, whereby the data segments have a set byte size in accordance with a set boundary parameter, as described above (Block 402).
Thereafter, the virtual server de-encapsulates each data segment and extracts necessary header information along with the payload data packet to effectively identify the appropriate client device where the payload data of the response should be routed (Block 404). In an aspect, Session ID information from the header information as well as the key information code for the data segment is processed to allow the network traffic management device 110 to identify which session the payload data belongs to.
The protocol converting module 212 of the network traffic management device 110 then encapsulates the payload data packet into a Layer 4 connectionless transmission protocol format, such as UDP, to generate an encapsulated datagram of the extracted payload data packet (Block 406). It should be noted that although UDP protocol is mentioned, other connectionless transmission protocols are contemplated.
As described in relation to the process in
Thereafter, the load balancing module 210 of the network traffic management device 110 performs load balancing logic on the datagram to effectively route the payload data to the proper client device 106 (Block 408). Similar to the process described in
As shown in
As shown in
Having thus described the basic concepts, it will be rather apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing detailed disclosure is intended to be presented by way of example only, and is not limiting. Various alterations, improvements, and modifications will occur and are intended to those skilled in the art, though not expressly stated herein. These alterations, improvements, and modifications are intended to be suggested hereby, and are within the spirit and scope of the examples. Additionally, the recited order of processing elements or sequences, or the use of numbers, letters, or other designations therefore, is not intended to limit the claimed processes to any order except as may be specified in the claims. Accordingly, the invention is limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3950735 | Patel | Apr 1976 | A |
4644532 | George et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4897781 | Chang et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4965772 | Daniel et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5023826 | Patel | Jun 1991 | A |
5053953 | Patel | Oct 1991 | A |
5167024 | Smith et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5299312 | Rocco, Jr. | Mar 1994 | A |
5327529 | Fults et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5367635 | Bauer et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371852 | Attanasio et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5406502 | Haramaty et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5475857 | Dally | Dec 1995 | A |
5517617 | Sathaye et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519694 | Brewer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519778 | Leighton et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521591 | Arora et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528701 | Aref | Jun 1996 | A |
5581764 | Fitzgerald et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596742 | Agarwal et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606665 | Yang et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611049 | Pitts | Mar 1997 | A |
5663018 | Cummings et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5752023 | Choucri et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761484 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768423 | Aref et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790554 | Pitcher et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802052 | Venkataraman | Sep 1998 | A |
5812550 | Sohn et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825772 | Dobbins et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832283 | Chou et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5875296 | Shi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5892914 | Pitts | Apr 1999 | A |
5892932 | Kim | Apr 1999 | A |
5919247 | Van Hoff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936939 | Des Jardins et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941988 | Bhagwat et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946690 | Pitts | Aug 1999 | A |
5949885 | Leighton | Sep 1999 | A |
5951694 | Choquier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959990 | Frantz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974460 | Maddalozzo, Jr. et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983281 | Ogle | Nov 1999 | A |
5988847 | McLaughlin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006260 | Barrick, Jr. et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006264 | Colby | Dec 1999 | A |
6026452 | Pitts | Feb 2000 | A |
6028857 | Poor | Feb 2000 | A |
6051169 | Brown et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6078956 | Bryant et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085234 | Pitts et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092196 | Reiche | Jul 2000 | A |
6108703 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111876 | Frantz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128279 | O'Neil et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128657 | Okanoya | Oct 2000 | A |
6160874 | Dickerman | Dec 2000 | A |
6170022 | Linville et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178423 | Douceur et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182139 | Brendel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192051 | Lipman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6233612 | Fruchtman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246684 | Chapman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253226 | Chidambaran et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253230 | Couland et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263368 | Martin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289012 | Harrington et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298380 | Coile et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327622 | Jindal et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343324 | Hubis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347339 | Morris et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360270 | Cherkasova et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374300 | Masters | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6396833 | Zhang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6430562 | Kardos et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434081 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6480476 | Willars | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484261 | Wiegel | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490624 | Sampson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510135 | Almulhem et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510458 | Berstis et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519643 | Foulkes et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6601084 | Bhaskaran | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6636503 | Shiran et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636894 | Short et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650640 | Muller et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650641 | Albert | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654701 | Hatley | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6683873 | Kwok et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691165 | Bruck et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694517 | James et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6708187 | Shanumgam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718380 | Mohaban et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6742045 | Albert | May 2004 | B1 |
6751663 | Farrell et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754228 | Ludwig | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760775 | Anerousis et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772219 | Shobatake | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6779039 | Bommareddy et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781986 | Sabaa et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6798777 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804542 | Haartsen | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816901 | Sitaraman et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816977 | Brakmo et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829238 | Tokuyo et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6868082 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876629 | Beshai et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6876654 | Hegde | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888836 | Cherkasova | May 2005 | B1 |
6928082 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947985 | Hegli et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950434 | Viswanath et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6954780 | Susai et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957272 | Tallegas et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959394 | Brickell et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6975592 | Seddigh et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6987763 | Rochberger et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7007092 | Peiffer | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7113993 | Cappiello et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7133944 | Song et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139792 | Mishra et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7228422 | Morioka et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7283470 | Sindhu et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7287082 | O'Toole, Jr. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7295827 | Liu et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308703 | Wright et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321926 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7333999 | Njemanze | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343413 | Gilde et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349391 | Ben-Dor et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7398552 | Pardee et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7433962 | Janssen et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454480 | Labio et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7490162 | Masters | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7500243 | Huetsch et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7500269 | Huotari et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505795 | Lim et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7516492 | Nisbet et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7526541 | Roese et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7558197 | Sindhu et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7580971 | Gollapudi et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7624424 | Morita et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7644137 | Bozak et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7668166 | Rekhter et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7706261 | Sun et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7724657 | Rao et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725093 | Sengupta et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7778187 | Chaturvedi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801978 | Susai et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7831662 | Clark et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7876677 | Cheshire | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7908314 | Yamaguchi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925908 | Kim | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933946 | Livshits et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7945908 | Waldspurger et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7984141 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8130650 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8199757 | Pani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8351333 | Rao | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8380854 | Szabo | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8447871 | Szabo | May 2013 | B1 |
8464265 | Worley | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8606921 | Vasquez et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615022 | Harrison | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8665868 | Kay | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8701179 | Penno et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8778665 | Glide et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8804504 | Chen | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8830874 | Cho et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9036529 | Erickson | May 2015 | B2 |
20010009554 | Katseff | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010023442 | Masters | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020046291 | O'Callaghan | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049842 | Huetsch et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059428 | Susai et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083067 | Tamayo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095498 | Chanda | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020138615 | Schmeling | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161913 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194342 | Lu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198993 | Cudd et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030046291 | Fascenda | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065653 | Overton | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030065951 | Igeta et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069918 | Lu | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069974 | Lu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070069 | Belapurkar et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086415 | Bernhard et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105983 | Brakmo et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108052 | Inoue | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128708 | Inoue | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145062 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145233 | Poletto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163576 | Janssen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030208596 | Carolan | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225485 | Fritz et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003287 | Zissimopoulos et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040072569 | Omae | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103283 | Hornak | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111523 | Hall | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111621 | Himberger et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117493 | Bazot et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040151186 | Akama | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040210663 | Phillips | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040255000 | Simionescu | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264472 | Oliver | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264481 | Darling | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267920 | Hydrie | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267948 | Oliver | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268358 | Darling | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004887 | Igakura et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021736 | Carusi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027869 | Johnson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044213 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052440 | Kim et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055435 | Gbadegesin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071283 | Randle | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078604 | Yim | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050122977 | Lieberman | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154837 | Keohane et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187866 | Lee | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188220 | Nilsson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198310 | Kim | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050262238 | Reeves et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050288939 | Peled | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060031520 | Bedekar et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059267 | Cugi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077902 | Kannan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083205 | Buddhikot | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060112176 | Liu | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112272 | Morioka | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129684 | Datta | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135198 | Lee | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156416 | Huotari et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161577 | Kulkarni | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168070 | Thompson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171365 | Borella | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179153 | Lee | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060182103 | Martini | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209853 | Hidaka | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230148 | Forecast | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233106 | Achlioptas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242300 | Yumoto | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060291483 | Sela | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006293 | Balakrishnan | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016662 | Desai | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019658 | Park | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070050843 | Manville | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058670 | Konduru | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064661 | Sood et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083646 | Miller et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088822 | Coile | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106796 | Kudo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107048 | Halls et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118879 | Yeun | May 2007 | A1 |
20070174491 | Still et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070220598 | Salowey et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233809 | Brownell | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258451 | Bouat | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070297410 | Yoon et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297551 | Choi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008202 | Terrell | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025297 | Kashyap | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034136 | Ulenas | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072303 | Syed | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120370 | Chan | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133518 | Kapoor et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134311 | Medvinsky et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148340 | Powell et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159145 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165801 | Sheppard | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178278 | Grinstein et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201599 | Ferraiolo et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205613 | Lopez | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222646 | Sigal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225710 | Raja | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229415 | Kapoor | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239986 | Xu | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253395 | Pandya | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256224 | Kaji et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288661 | Galles | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301760 | Lim | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316922 | Riddle | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090028337 | Balabine et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049230 | Pandya | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070617 | Arimilli et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077619 | Boyce | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094610 | Sukirya | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119504 | van Os et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125496 | Wexler et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125532 | Wexler et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125625 | Shim | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138749 | Moll et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141891 | Boyen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157678 | Turk | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090196282 | Fellman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228956 | He et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090287935 | Aull et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296624 | Ryu | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300407 | Kamath | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011434 | Kay | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017846 | Huang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023582 | Pedersen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100071048 | Novak et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100115236 | Bataineh et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122091 | Huang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150154 | Viger et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165877 | Shukla et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100242092 | Harris et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251330 | Kroeselberg et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100279733 | Karsten | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100322250 | Shetty et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325277 | Muthiah et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110040889 | Garrett et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047620 | Mahaffey et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066718 | Susai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110153822 | Rajan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154443 | Thakur | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173295 | Bakke et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184733 | Yu | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110246800 | Accpadi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110273984 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282997 | Prince et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110321122 | Mwangi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016994 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120039341 | Latif | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041965 | Vasquez | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120063314 | Pignataro | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066489 | Ozaki et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101952 | Raleigh et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120311153 | Morgan | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317266 | Abbott | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130336122 | Baruah | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140040478 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140095661 | Knowles et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0744850 | Nov 1996 | EP |
9114326 | Sep 1991 | WO |
9505712 | Feb 1995 | WO |
9905829 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9709805 | Mar 1997 | WO |
9745800 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9906913 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9910858 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9939373 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9964967 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0004422 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0004458 | Jan 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Crescendo Networks, “Application Layer Processing (ALP),” 2003-2009, pp. 168-186, Chapter 9, CN-5000E/5500E, Foxit Software Company. |
“A Process for Selective Routing of Servlet Content to Transcoding Modules,” Research Disclosure 422124, Jun. 1999, pp. 889-890, IBM Corporation. |
“Big-IP Controller with Exclusive OneConnect Content Switching Feature Provides a Breakthrough System for Maximizing Server and Network Performance,” F5 Networks, Inc. Press Release, May 8, 2001, 2 pages, Las Vegas, Nevada. |
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1,” Network Working Group, RFC: 2068, Jan. 1997, pp. 1-162. |
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1,” Network Working Group, RFC: 2616, Jun. 1999, pp. 1-176. |
Floyd et al., “Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance,” Aug. 1993, pp. 1-22, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, California. |
Hochmuth, Phil, “F5, CacheFlow pump up content-delivery lines,” Network World Fusion, May 4, 2001, 1 page, Las Vegas, Nevada. |
“Servlet/Applet/HTML Authentication Process With Single Sign-On,” Research Disclosure 429128, Jan. 2000, pp. 163-164, IBM Corporation. |
“Traffic Surges; Surge Queue; Netscaler Defense,” 2005, PowerPoint Presentation, slides 1-12, Citrix Systems, Inc. |
MacVittie, Lori, “Message-Based Load Balancing,” Technical Brief, Jan. 2010, pp. 1-9, F5 Networks, Inc. |
Abad, C., et al., “An Analysis on the Schemes for Detecting and Preventing ARP Cache Poisoning Attacks”, IEEE, Computer Society, 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW'07), 2007, pp. 1-8. |
OWASP, “Testing for Cross site scripting”, OWASP Testing Guide v2, Table of Contents, Feb. 24, 2011, pp. 1-5, (www.owasp.org/index.php/Testing—for—Cross—site—scripting). |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/026615, Date of Mailing: Jul. 4, 2013. |
F5 Networks Inc., “Configuration Guide for Local Traffic Management,” F5 Networks Inc., Jan. 2006, version 9.2.2, 406 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/400,398 to Paul Jiang, filed Feb. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,042 to Baumann et al., filed Sep. 15, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,047 to Wojcik et al., filed Sep. 15, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/822,146 to Jeff Costlow, filed Jun. 23, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/235,276 to Hawthorne et al., filed Sep. 16, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,031 to Baumann et al., filed Sep. 15, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/165,783 to Jain et al., filed Jun. 21, 2011. |