Typically, when a company first starts storing information in a database, all of the information is stored in a single database. As the company grows, more and more information needs to be stored, and the database grows larger. At the same time, the database becomes less efficient because a bottleneck exists at the server handling all of the data requests for the database.
Examples of a cloud-based platform (e.g., cloud-based collaboration and/or storage platform/service) that uses multiple shard databases that are partitioned by user are illustrated in the figures. The examples and figures are illustrative rather than limiting.
A cloud-based platform (e.g., cloud-based collaboration and/or storage platform/service) is described that uses a database partitioned horizontally into multiple shard databases, where data is divided amongst the shard databases according to ownership of the data, and all data owned by a particular user is co-located in the same shard database. Ownership of data can be changed via user-initiated actions within the cloud-based platform (e.g., cloud-based collaboration and/or storage platform/service), that is, a current owner of data can transfer ownership to a different user of the cloud-based platform (e.g., cloud-based collaboration and/or storage platform/service). When change of ownership of data occurs, the system migrates the data, if necessary, to an appropriate shard database associated with the new owner of the data. Location of data within the shard databases is maintained in a mapping database that maps data object identifications to shard identifications.
Various aspects and examples of the invention will now be described. The following description provides specific details for a thorough understanding and enabling description of these examples. One skilled in the art will understand, however, that the invention may be practiced without many of these details. Additionally, some well-known structures or functions may not be shown or described in detail, so as to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the relevant description.
The terminology used in the description presented below is intended to be interpreted in its broadest reasonable manner, even though it is being used in conjunction with a detailed description of certain specific examples of the technology. Certain terms may even be emphasized below; however, any terminology intended to be interpreted in any restricted manner will be overtly and specifically defined as such in this Detailed Description section.
All files and folders that belong to a user are co-located and maintained on a single shard database. In some embodiments, when a user account is associated with an enterprise or a business, all files and folders associated with a single enterprise or business are co-located and maintained on a single shard database. In some embodiments, the host server 100, mapping database 130, and shard databases 120-1 . . . 120-n are directly coupled, rather than coupled through the network 106.
The client devices 102 can be any system and/or device, and/or any combination of devices/systems that is able to establish a connection, including wired, wireless, cellular connections with another device, a server and/or other systems such as host server 100 via, for example, a web application. Client devices 102 will typically include a display and/or other output functionalities to present information and data exchanged between or among the devices 102 and/or the host server 100.
For example, the client devices 102 can include mobile, hand held or portable devices or non-portable devices and can be any of, but not limited to, a server desktop, a desktop computer, a computer cluster, or portable devices including, a notebook, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a palmtop computer, a mobile phone, a cell phone, a smart phone (e.g., a BlackBerry device such as BlackBerry Z10/Q10, an iPhone, Nexus 4, etc.), a Treo, a handheld tablet (e.g. an iPad, iPad Mini, a Galaxy Note, Galaxy Note II, Xoom Tablet, Microsoft Surface, Blackberry PlayBook, Nexus 7, 10 etc.), a phablet (e.g., HTC Droid DNA, etc.), a wearable smart electronic wireless device (e.g., an electronic glasses—Google glass, a smart watch (e.g., a Google watch), a tablet PC, a thin-client, a hand held console, a hand held gaming device or console (e.g., XBOX live, Nintendo DS, Sony PlayStation Portable, etc.), iOS powered watch, Google Glass, a Chromebook and/or any other portable, mobile, hand held devices, etc. running on any platform or any operating system (e.g., Mac-based OS (OS X, iOS, etc.), Windows-based OS (Windows Mobile, Windows 7, Windows 8, etc.), Android, Blackberry OS, Embedded Linux platforms, Palm OS, Symbian platform, Google Chrome OS, and the like. In one embodiment, the client devices 102, and host server 100 are coupled via a network 106. In some embodiments, the devices 102 and host server 100 may be directly connected to one another.
The input mechanism on client devices 102 can include touch screen keypad (including single touch, multi-touch, gesture sensing in 2D or 3D, etc.), a physical keypad, a mouse, a pointer, a track pad, motion detector (e.g., including 1-axis, 2-axis, 3-axis accelerometer, etc.), a light sensor, capacitance sensor, resistance sensor, temperature sensor, proximity sensor, a piezoelectric device, device orientation detector (e.g., electronic compass, tilt sensor, rotation sensor, gyroscope, accelerometer), or a combination of the above.
Signals received or detected indicating user activity at client devices 102 through one or more of the above input mechanism, or others, can be used in the disclosed technology by various users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) for accessing, through network 106, a cloud-based platform (e.g., cloud-based collaboration and/or storage platform/service) (e.g., hosted by the host server 100). The collaboration environment or platform can have one or more collective settings 125 for an enterprise or an organization to which the users belong, and can provide a user interface 104 for the users to access such platform under the settings 125.
The cloud-based service (e.g, collaboration platform or environment) hosts workspaces with work items that one or more users can access (e.g., view, edit, update, revise, comment, add to discussions, download, preview, tag, or otherwise manipulate, etc.). A work item can generally include any type of digital or electronic content that can be viewed or accessed via an electronic device (e.g., device 102). The digital content can include .PDF files, .doc, slides (e.g., PowerPoint slides), images, audio files, multimedia content, web pages, blogs, etc. A workspace can generally refer to any grouping of a set of digital content in the collaboration platform. The grouping can be created, identified, or specified by a user or through other means. This user may be a creator user or administrative user, for example.
In general, a workspace can be associated with a set of users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) which have access to the content included therein. The levels of access (e.g., based on permissions or rules) of each user or collaborator to access the content in a given workspace may be the same or may vary among the users. Each user may have their own set of access rights to every piece of content in the workspace, or each user may have different access rights to different pieces of content. Access rights may be specified by a user associated with a workspace and/or a user who created/uploaded a particular piece of content to the workspace, or any other designated user or collaborator.
In general, the collaboration platform allows multiple users or collaborators to access or collaborate on efforts on work items such that each user can see, remotely, edits, revisions, comments, or annotations being made to specific work items through their own user devices. For example, a user can upload a document to a workspace for other users to access (e.g., for viewing, editing, commenting, discussing, signing-off, or otherwise manipulating). The user can login to the online platform and upload the document (or any other type of work item) to an existing workspace or to a new workspace. The document can be shared with existing users or collaborators in a workspace. Each document, work item, file, and folder can only be owned by a single user. However, the owner of the document, work item, file, or folder can transfer ownership to another collaborator.
The shard databases 120-1 . . . 120-n are each a sub-database of the system. Each table in the system database is split amongst the shard databases 120-1 . . . 120-n. As an illustration,
The mapping database 130 stores mappings, for example, between a user and the shard database on which data objects owned by the user are stored, between an enterprise and the shard database on which data objects owned by all users associated with the enterprise are stored, between a file and the shard database on which the file is stored, and between a folder and the shard database on which the folder is stored.
In some embodiments, client devices 102 communicate with the host server 100 over network 106. In general, network 106, over which the client devices 102 and the host server 100 communicate, may be a cellular network, a telephonic network, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet, or any combination thereof. For example, the Internet can provide file transfer, remote log in, email, news, RSS, cloud-based services, instant messaging, visual voicemail, push mail, VoIP, and other services through any known or convenient protocol, such as, but not limited to, the TCP/IP protocol, Open System Interconnections (OSI), FTP, UPnP, iSCSI, NSF, ISDN, PDH, RS-232, SDH, SONET, etc.
The network 106 can be any collection of distinct networks operating wholly or partially in conjunction to provide connectivity to the client devices 102 and the host server 100 and may appear as one or more networks to the serviced systems and devices. In some embodiments, communications to and from the client devices 102 can be achieved by, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet. In some embodiments, communications can be achieved by a secure communications protocol, such as secure sockets layer (SSL), or transport layer security (TLS).
In addition, communications can be achieved via one or more networks, such as, but are not limited to, one or more of WiMax, a Local Area Network (LAN), Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN), a Personal area network (PAN), a Campus area network (CAN), a Metropolitan area network (MAN), a Wide area network (WAN), a Wireless wide area network (WWAN), enabled with technologies such as, by way of example, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Personal Communications Service (PCS), Digital Advanced Mobile Phone Service (D-Amps), Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Fixed Wireless Data, 2G, 2.5G, 3G, 4G, IMT-Advanced, pre-4G, 3G LTE, 3GPP LTE, LTE Advanced, mobile WiMax, WiMax 2, WirelessMAN-Advanced networks, enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE), General packet radio service (GPRS), enhanced GPRS, iBurst, UMTS, HSPDA, HSUPA, HSPA, UMTS-TDD, 1×RTT, EV-DO, messaging protocols such as, TCP/IP, SMS, MMS, extensible messaging and presence protocol (XMPP), real time messaging protocol (RTMP), instant messaging and presence protocol (IMPP), instant messaging, USSD, IRC, or any other wireless data networks or messaging protocols.
The web-based platform for collaborating on projects or jointly working on documents can be used by individual users and shared among collaborators. In addition, the collaboration platform can be deployed in an organized setting including but not limited to, a company (e.g., an enterprise setting), a department in a company, an academic institution, a department in an academic institution, a class or course setting, or any other types of organizations or organized setting.
When deployed in an organizational setting, multiple workspaces (e.g., workspace A, B C) can be created to support different projects or a variety of work flows. Each workspace can have its own associated work items. For example, workspace A 205 may be associated with work items 215, workspace B 225 can be associated with work items 235, and workspace N 245 can be associated with work items 255. The work items 215, 235, and 255 may be unique to each workspace but need not be. For example, a particular word document can be associated with only one workspace (e.g., workspace A 205) or it may be associated with multiple workspaces (e.g., workspace A 205 and workspace B 225, etc.).
In general, each workspace has a set of users or collaborators associated with it. For example, workspace A 205 is associated with multiple users or collaborators 206. In some instances, workspaces deployed in an enterprise may be department specific. For example, workspace B may be associated with department 210 and some users shown as example user A 208, and workspace N 245 can be associated with departments 212 and 216 and users shown as example user B 214.
The host server 100 of the cloud-based platform (e.g., cloud-based collaboration and/or storage platform/service) can generally be a cloud-based service. The data access layer 110 of the host server 100 can include, for example, a network interface 302, a code creation engine 310, a request translation module 320, a class engine 330, a look up engine 340, an update engine 350, and/or an execution module 360. The update engine 350 can include a migration module 352, a mapping database update module 354, and/or a rollback module 356. Additional or fewer components/modules/engines can be included in the host server 100, data access layer 110 and each illustrated component.
The network interface 302 can be a networking module that enables the data access layer 110 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the data access layer 110, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the data access layer 110 (e.g., object relational mapping (ORM)) and the external entity. The network interface 302 can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card (e.g., SMS interface, WiFi interface, interfaces for various generations of mobile communication standards including but not limited to 1G, 2G, 3G, 3.5G, 4G, LTE, etc.,), Bluetooth, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.
As used herein, a “module” or an “engine” includes a general purpose, dedicated or shared processor and, typically, firmware or software modules that are executed by the processor. Depending upon implementation-specific or other considerations, the module or engine can be centralized or its functionality distributed. The module or engine can include general or special purpose hardware, firmware, or software embodied in a computer-readable (storage) medium for execution by the processor. As used herein, a computer-readable medium or computer-readable storage medium is intended to include all mediums that are statutory (e.g., in the United States, under 35 U.S.C. 101), and to specifically exclude all mediums that are non-statutory in nature to the extent that the exclusion is necessary for a claim that includes the computer-readable (storage) medium to be valid. Known statutory computer-readable mediums include hardware (e.g., registers, random access memory (RAM), non-volatile (NV) storage, to name a few), but may or may not be limited to hardware.
Some embodiments of the data access layer 110 include the code creation engine 310 which can create a code representation for each table stored in the collective shard databases 1-n 120-1 . . . 120-n. For example, for a file table that includes stored files, the data access layer 110 creates a type of object that is a file, i.e., a file object, and for a folder table, the data access layer 110 creates a type of object that is a folder, i.e., a folder object. These code objects are manipulated by the web application used by a user to make a database query.
The mapping database 130 can include a user table that maps a user identification, user_id, to a shard identification, shard_id; an enterprise table that maps an enterprise identification, enterprise_id to a shard_id; a file table that maps a file identification, file_id, to a shard_id; and a folder table that maps a folder identification, folder_id, to a shard_id.
The global application database 135 can include a user table that associates a user_id with a name of the user and other user information; and an enterprise table that associates an enterprise_id with a name of the enterprise and other enterprise information.
The shard database 1 120-1 and the shard database 2 120-2 can each include a file table and a folder table that include respective data in the shard databases. The file table associates a file_id with a user_id and other file information; and the folder table associates a folder_id with a user_id and other folder information.
Some embodiments of the data access layer 110 include the class engine 330 which maps each database table to a class in the code representation, for example, there can be a file class and a folder class. For every class, the class engine 330 defines its database keys. For example, for the file class, defined database keys can be file identification (file_id), file name, parent folder, and owner.
For every class, the class engine 330 also defines mapping keys that can be used to look up in the mapping database where a particular object is located, that is, a shard identification location. For example, because all of a user's files and folders are co-located on the same shard database, whichever shard database that a user is mapped to, the content owned by that user will be located there. Thus, user identification (user_id) is a mapping key that can be used for the file class and the folder class.
As an example, if a query for a particular file identification is received, rather than going to the shard databases to look for the file identification, the data access layer 110 goes to the mapping database 130 to determine which shard database that particular file is stored in. Then the data access layer 110 goes directly to the identified shard database to retrieve the information in response to the request.
Some embodiments of the data access layer 110 include the request translation module 120 which receives database requests via a web application from a user and translates the request to a query on the shard databases 120-1 . . . 120-n. The request translation module 120 also determines whether the fields of the received request are merely regular keys or are mapping keys.
If the request translation module 120 determines that the received request includes a mapping key, the mapping key is used by the look up engine 340 to look up in the mapping database 130 where the queried object is currently located and where objects belonging to the new owner reside. From this information, the look up engine 340 further determines whether the location of the object needs to be moved to a different shard database, i.e., an online shard migration.
As an example, if the received request is file set_owner (new_owner), i.e., setting a new owner for a file, the request translation module 120 determines that new_owner is a mapping key. Subsequently, the look up engine 340 finds in the mapping database the current owner of the file and then compares the assigned shard database for the current owner and the new owner. If the assigned shard database is different for the current owner and the new owner, the file needs to be moved with an online shard migration process. If the assigned shard database is the same, the file location remains in its current shard database location.
If the request translation module 120 determines that the received request only uses regular keys, not mapping keys, there is no need to consider whether the requested object needs to be moved to a different shard database. For example, if the user wants to modify a file and the request translation module 120 receives a file set_date request, the request translation module 120 identifies that no mapping keys are used in the fields of the request. Then the execution module 360 executes the database request and simply makes the modification because it does not involve an online shard migration.
The update engine 350 performs the online shard migration to move the location of objects within the shard databases. Within the cloud-based platform (e.g., cloud-based collaboration and/or storage platform/service), this can arise when two users collaborate on a folder. With collaboration, a user can have access to a folder located on a shard database different from the shard database in which objects owned by that user are stored. Further, a user can move a file into a collaborator's folder, thus transferring ownership of the file to the collaborator. When ownership of a file or folder changes, if the assigned shard database of the transferor (current owner) is different from the assigned shard database of the transferee (new owner), an online shard migration needs to be performed.
The online shard migration process involves transactions on three databases, the original shard database, the new shard database, and the mapping database. The migration module 352 copies items from a first shard to a second shard during an online shard migration and subsequently removes the copied items from the first shard, and the mapping database update module 354 updates the corresponding mapping in the mapping database when an online shard migration is performed.
The online shard migration process starts by opening a first transaction on the mapping database, a second transaction on the original source shard, and a third transaction on the new destination shard. When these transactions are begun, the contents of the rows of the three databases that will be involved in the shard migration process are locked to block access to the data during the process.
Then the appropriate rows on the original source shard are selected for updating, and the corresponding rows in the mapping database are updated to the new destination shard. Next, the new rows are inserted in the new destination shard, and finally, the content is deleted on the original source shard. The transaction on the destination shard is committed first, then the transaction on the mapping database is committed, and last, the transaction on the source shard is committed.
The rollback module 356 monitors the online shard migration process and erases any changes made to the three databases if any problems arise during the shard migration process.
Shard migration has been discussed above with respect to files. With folders that can contain files and other folders, the process is slightly different. If the data access layer 110 receives a request folder set_owner (new_owner), i.e., setting a new owner for a folder, the mapping process is similar to setting a new owner for a file, but in this case, if the shard database on which data owned by the new owner is different from the shard database on which the folder is currently stored, not only does the folder migrate to the new shard database but other folders stored within the folder migrate as well. All the related objects should be copied over to the new shard database to maintain co-location of the stored objects for each user.
With this information, a tree-based prefix query can be performed for all folders having a path in, for example, folder A's tree. With a prefix query, the identification for a particular file and folder is not looked up in the mapping database, rather, all folders that match the path with folder A are located in the same database as folder A. These folders will need to be moved along with folder A to maintain co-location of objects that belong to a particular user.
At block 605, the data access layer (e.g., object relational mapping (ORM)) identifies all items owned by one selected user out of all the users for which the database stores data. Then at decision block 610, the data access layer determines whether the user is associated with an enterprise account provided by a cloud-based platform. If the user is not associated with an enterprise account (block 610—No), at block 615, the data access layer moves all items owned by the selected user to a single shard database.
If the user is associated with an enterprise account (block 610—Yes), at block 620, the data access layer moves all items owned by the selected user to a shard database associated with the enterprise account. Then at decision block 625, the data access layer determines if there are any more users in the list of users for which the data access layer needs to evaluate for the partitioning process. If data for all users using the database have been partitioned (block 625—No), at block 630 the data access layer creates a mapping database. The mapping database maintains a listing of which shard database the data owned by each user is located in. And at block 635, the data access layer identifies the parent and path for each folder and stores this information.
If there is another user to be evaluated for the partitioning process (block 625—Yes), the process returns to block 605 where all items owned by the next user are identified.
At block 705, the data access layer receives a new item (file, folder, or combination) for storage in the database. Then at decision block 710, the data access layer determines whether the user who owns the new item is a new user. If the database already stores items owned by the user (block 710—No), at block 715, the data access layer looks up the shard identification for the shard database that stores the items owned by the user. Then at block 717, the data access layer stores the new item in the identified shard database.
If the user does not already have items stored in the database (block 710—Yes), then at decision block 720, the data access layer determines whether the user is associated with a particular enterprise account. If the user is not associated with an enterprise account (block 720—No), at block 725, the data access layer identifies a shard database that has free space for storing the new items. Then at block 717, the data access layer stores the new item in the identified shard database.
If the user is associated with an enterprise account (block 720—Yes), at block 730, the data access layer identifies the shard database associated with the enterprise account of the new user, and the process continues to block 717.
At block 805, the data access layer receives a database request, for example, the database request can be ‘file set data’ or ‘file set owner.’ Then at decision block 810, the data access layer determines whether one of the fields of the request is a mapping key. If none of the fields of the request is a mapping key (block 810—No), the request will not entail consideration as to whether the data needs to be moved to a different shard database. And at block 815, the data access layer executes the received request.
If one of the fields of the request is a mapping key (block 810—Yes), at block 820, the identified mapping key is used with the mapping database to find the shard database in which data for the new owner is stored.
Then at decision block 825, the data access layer determines if the shard database in which data for the new owner is stored is different from the shard database storing data for the current owner. If the shard database is the same (block 825—No), at block 815, the data access layer executes the request. If the shard database is different (block 825—Yes), an online shard migration process ensues.
At block 830, the data access layer begins the transaction on the mapping database, and access to rows or items in the mapping database that will be effected are locked; at block 835, the transaction on the source shard database begins, and access to rows or items in the source shard database that will be effected are locked; and at block 840, the transaction on the destination shard database begins, and access to rows or items in the destination shard database that will be effected are locked.
Then at block 840, the rows on the source shard database are selected for updating. Next, at block 850, the appropriate rows or items in the mapping database are updated to indicate the new destination shard database. Then, at block 855, the new rows of data or items are inserted into the appropriate table of the destination shard database. And at block 860, the copied content is deleted from the source shard database.
Then at block 865, the transaction on the destination shard database is committed, and the lock on the rows or items in the destination shard database is released; at block 870, the transaction on the mapping database is committed, and the lock on the rows or items in the mapping database is released; and at block 875 the transaction on the source shard database is committed, and the lock on the rows or items in the source shard database is released.
In alternative embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or may be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine may operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.
The machine may be a server computer, a client computer, a personal computer (PC), a user device, a tablet PC, a laptop computer, a set-top box (STB), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, an iPhone, an iPad, a wearable smart electronic wireless device (e.g., an electronic glasses—Google glass, a smart watch (e.g., a Google watch), a Blackberry, a processor, a telephone, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, a console, a hand-held console, a (hand-held) gaming device, a music player, any portable, mobile, hand-held device, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
While the machine-readable medium or machine-readable storage medium is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the presently disclosed technique and innovation.
In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure may be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.
Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.
Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include but are not limited to recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” As used herein, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” or any variant thereof, means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements; the coupling of connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above detailed description of embodiments of the disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the teachings to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the disclosure are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks may be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or sub-combinations. Each of these processes or blocks may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks may instead be performed in parallel, or may be performed at different times. Further any specific numbers noted herein are only examples: alternative implementations may employ differing values or ranges.
The teachings of the disclosure provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
Any patents and applications and other references noted above, including any that may be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects of the disclosure can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further embodiments of the disclosure.
These and other changes can be made to the disclosure in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description describes certain embodiments of the disclosure, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the teachings can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system may vary considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by the subject matter disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the disclosure should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the disclosure with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the disclosure encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the disclosure under the claims.
While certain aspects of the disclosure are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the disclosure in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the disclosure is recited as a means-plus-function claim under 35 U.S.C. §112, ¶6, other aspects may likewise be embodied as a means-plus-function claim, or in other forms, such as being embodied in a computer-readable medium. (Any claims intended to be treated under 35 U.S.C. §112, ¶6 will begin with the words “means for.”) Accordingly, the applicant reserves the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of and/or the right of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/668,626 entitled “ONLINE SHARD MIGRATION,” which was filed on Jul. 6, 2012, the contents of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5799320 | Klug | Aug 1998 | A |
5848415 | Guck | Dec 1998 | A |
5999908 | Abelow | Dec 1999 | A |
6034621 | Kaufman | Mar 2000 | A |
6055543 | Christensen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6073161 | DeBoskey et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098078 | Gehani et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6233600 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6289345 | Yasue | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292803 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6336124 | Alam et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341340 | Tsukerman | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342906 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345386 | Delo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370543 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374260 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385606 | Inohara et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6396593 | Laverty et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6515681 | Knight | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539381 | Prasad et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6636872 | Heath et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654737 | Nunez | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662186 | Esquibel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687878 | Eintracht et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714968 | Prust | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6735623 | Prust | May 2004 | B1 |
6742181 | Koike et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6947162 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952724 | Prust | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6996768 | Elo et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010752 | Ly | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020697 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7039806 | Friedman et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7069393 | Miyata et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7130831 | Howard et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133834 | Abelow | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149787 | Mutalik et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7152182 | Ji et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155483 | Friend et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7165107 | Pouyoul et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7222078 | Abelow | May 2007 | B2 |
7275244 | Charles Bell et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7296025 | Kung et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7346778 | Guiter et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7353252 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7370269 | Prabhu et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7401117 | Dan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7469257 | Parlin | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7543000 | Castro et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7581221 | Lai et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7620565 | Abelow | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647559 | Yozell-Epstein et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650367 | Arruza | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7661088 | Burke | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665093 | Maybee et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676542 | Moser et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698363 | Dan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7734600 | Wise et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7756843 | Palmer | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7774412 | Schnepel | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7814426 | Huesken et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7886287 | Davda | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7890964 | Vogler-Ivashchanka et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7937663 | Parker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958453 | Taing | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7979296 | Kruse et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7996374 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8027976 | Ding et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
RE42904 | Stephens, Jr. | Nov 2011 | E |
8065739 | Bruening et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8090361 | Hagan | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103662 | Eagan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8117261 | Briere et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8140513 | Ghods et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8151183 | Chen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8185830 | Saha et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8214747 | Yankovich et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8230348 | Peters et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8347276 | Schadow | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358701 | Chou et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8429540 | Yankovich et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8464161 | Giles et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8549066 | Donahue et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8549511 | Seki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8607306 | Bridge et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
20010027492 | Gupta | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020091738 | Rohrabaugh et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099772 | Deshpande et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020133509 | Johnston et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147770 | Tang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194177 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030041095 | Konda et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030084306 | Abburi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093404 | Bader et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108052 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110264 | Whidby et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135536 | Lyons | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135565 | Estrada | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154306 | Perry | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030204490 | Kasriel | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217171 | Von Stuermer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040021686 | Barberis | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040088647 | Miller et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103147 | Flesher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111415 | Scardino et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117438 | Considine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122949 | Zmudzinski et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128359 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040177138 | Salle et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181579 | Huck et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230624 | Frolund et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246532 | Inada | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267836 | Armangau et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005276 | Morgan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010860 | Weiss et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022229 | Gabriel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028006 | Leser et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039001 | Hudis | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050228 | Perham et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063083 | Dart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097225 | Glatt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108406 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114305 | Haynes et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114378 | Elien et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050182966 | Pham et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198299 | Beck et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198452 | Watanabe | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234864 | Shapiro | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234943 | Clarke | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261933 | Magnuson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060005163 | Huesken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026502 | Dutta | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026535 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036568 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041603 | Paterson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047804 | Fredricksen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053088 | Ali et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070083 | Brunswig et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075071 | Gillette | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060123062 | Bobbitt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133340 | Rybak et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168550 | Muller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174051 | Lordi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174054 | Matsuki | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179070 | George et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060242204 | Karas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259524 | Horton | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265719 | Astl et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271510 | Harward et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016680 | Burd et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038934 | Fellman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070100830 | Beedubail et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115845 | Hochwarth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118598 | Bedi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124460 | McMullen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124737 | Wensley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124781 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126635 | Houri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130143 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130163 | Perez et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070198609 | Black et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208878 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214180 | Crawford | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220016 | Estrada et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220590 | Rasmussen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070240057 | Satterfield et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256065 | Heishi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282848 | Kiilerich et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283443 | McPherson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288290 | Motoyama et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005135 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005195 | Li | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016146 | Gan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021959 | Naghi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028323 | Rosen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040173 | Aleong et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046828 | Bibliowicz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059656 | Saliba et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063210 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065881 | Dawson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077631 | Petri | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091763 | Devonshire et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091790 | Beck | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104277 | Tian | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114720 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133674 | Knauerhase et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140732 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147790 | Malaney et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151817 | Fitchett et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154873 | Redlich et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080182628 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183467 | Yuan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184130 | Tien et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080194239 | Hagan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215883 | Fok et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222654 | Xu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243855 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250333 | Reeves et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250348 | Alimpich et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263099 | Brady-Kalnay et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271095 | Shafton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276158 | Lim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090015864 | Hasegawa | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019093 | Brodersen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019426 | Baeumer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030710 | Levine | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037679 | Kaushik | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090044128 | Baumgarten et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049131 | Lyle et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090125469 | McDonald et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132651 | Roger et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138808 | Moromisato et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150417 | Ghods et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150627 | Benhase et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158142 | Arthursson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164438 | Delacruz | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171983 | Samji et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193107 | Srinivasan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193345 | Wensley et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198772 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210459 | Nair et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090214115 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090235167 | Boyer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235181 | Saliba et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235189 | Aybes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240664 | Dinker | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249224 | Davis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254589 | Nair et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090260060 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271708 | Peters et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282212 | Peterson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300356 | Crandell | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300527 | Malcolm et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327358 | Lukiyanov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327961 | De Vorchik et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011292 | Marinkovich et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011447 | Jothimani | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017262 | Iyer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030995 | Wang | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036929 | Scherpa et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042720 | Stienhans et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057560 | Skudlark et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100057785 | Khosravy et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076946 | Barker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082634 | Leban | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100083136 | Komine et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088150 | Mazhar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092126 | Kaliszek et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100093310 | Gbadegesin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107225 | Spencer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131868 | Chawla et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100151431 | Miller | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162365 | Del Real | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162374 | Nair | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179940 | Gilder et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185463 | Noland et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191689 | Cortes et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198783 | Wang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198871 | Stiegler et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198944 | Ho et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205537 | Knighton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223378 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100229085 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235526 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241611 | Zuber | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241972 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250120 | Waupotitsch et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257457 | De Goes | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262582 | Garcia-Ascanio et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100267588 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274765 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274772 | Samuels | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281118 | Donahue et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100290623 | Banks et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306379 | Ferris | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322252 | Suganthi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325155 | Skinner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325655 | Perez | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332401 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333116 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001763 | Murakami | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016409 | Grosz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022559 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022812 | van der Linden et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029883 | Lussier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040812 | Phillips | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110041083 | Gabai et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047413 | McGill et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047484 | Mount et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052155 | Desmarais et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110054968 | Galaviz | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055299 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055721 | Jain et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061045 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061046 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110065082 | Gal et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066951 | Ward-Karet et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083167 | Carpenter et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093567 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099006 | Sundararaman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110119313 | Sung et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137991 | Russell | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142410 | Ishii | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145744 | Haynes et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161289 | Pei et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167125 | Achlioptas | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167353 | Grosz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167435 | Fang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185292 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202424 | Chun et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202599 | Yuan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208958 | Stuedi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209064 | Jorgensen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213765 | Cui et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219419 | Reisman | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225417 | Maharajh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238458 | Purcell et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238621 | Agrawal | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238759 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239135 | Spataro et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246294 | Robb et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246950 | Luna et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252320 | Arrasvuori et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258461 | Bates | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258561 | Ladouceur et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282710 | Akkiraju et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289433 | Whalin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296022 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307450 | Hahn | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313803 | Friend et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320197 | Conejero et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120036370 | Lim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120064879 | Panei | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072436 | Pierre et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079095 | Evans et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089659 | Halevi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110005 | Kuo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120110436 | Adler, III et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117626 | Yates et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124306 | Abercrombie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124547 | Halbedel | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130900 | Tang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134491 | Liu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136936 | Quintuna | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150888 | Hyatt et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151551 | Readshaw et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158908 | Luna et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159178 | Lin et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159310 | Chang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173625 | Berger | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179981 | Whalin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185355 | Kilroy | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185913 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192055 | Antebi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192086 | Ghods et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203908 | Beaty et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204032 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120214444 | McBride et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218885 | Abel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221789 | Felter | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226767 | Luna et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233155 | Gallmeier et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233205 | McDermott | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240061 | Hillenius et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120263166 | Cho et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266203 | Elhadad et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120284638 | Cutler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284664 | Zhao | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120291011 | Quine | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120309540 | Holme et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311157 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317239 | Mulder et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317487 | Lieb et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120328259 | Seibert, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331177 | Jensen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331441 | Adamson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007245 | Malik et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007471 | Grab et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007894 | Dang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013560 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014023 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130042106 | Persaud et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055127 | Saito et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130067232 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073403 | Tuchman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080919 | Kiang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130117337 | Dunham | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124638 | Barreto et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138608 | Smith | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138615 | Gupta et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130159411 | Bowen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163289 | Kim et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130167253 | Seleznev et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130185347 | Romano | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185558 | Seibert et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191339 | Haden et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198600 | Lockhart et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212486 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130239049 | Perrodin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246932 | Zaveri et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262210 | Savage et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130262862 | Hartley | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268480 | Dorman | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268491 | Chung et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275398 | Dorman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275429 | York et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275509 | Micucci et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130305039 | Gauda | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140033277 | Xiao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033291 | Liu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140052939 | Tseng et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140068589 | Barak | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140156373 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172595 | Beddow et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2724521 | Nov 2009 | CA |
101997924 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102264063 | Nov 2011 | CN |
0921661 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1349088 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1528746 | May 2005 | EP |
2372574 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2610776 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2453924 | Apr 2009 | GB |
2471282 | Dec 2010 | GB |
09-101937 | Apr 1997 | JP |
11-025059 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2003273912 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004310272 | Nov 2004 | JP |
09-269925 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008250944 | Oct 2008 | JP |
20020017444 | Mar 2002 | KR |
20040028036 | Apr 2004 | KR |
20050017674 | Feb 2005 | KR |
20060070306 | Jun 2006 | KR |
20060114871 | Nov 2006 | KR |
20070043353 | Apr 2007 | KR |
20070100477 | Oct 2007 | KR |
20100118836 | Nov 2010 | KR |
20110074096 | Jun 2011 | KR |
20110076831 | Jul 2011 | KR |
WO-0007104 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0219128 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-2004097681 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2006028850 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2007024438 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007035637 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2008011142 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008076520 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2011109416 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO-2012167272 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO-2013009328 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013013217 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013041763 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013166520 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Database Scalability, Elasticity, and Autonomy in the Cloud” Agrawal et al. (Jan. 2011). |
Extended Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 25, 2014, 7 pages. |
Extended Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 26, 2014, 12pages. |
Search Report for EP 13189144.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Sep. 1, 2014, 9 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312874.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Sep. 26, 2014, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1415126.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 2, 2014, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1415314.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 7, 2014, 3 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1315232.7 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 9, 2014, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318789.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 30, 2014, 6 pages. |
Microsoft Windows XP Professional Product Documentation: How Inheritance Affects File and Folder Permissions, Apr. 11, 2014, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1317393.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311417.8 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311421.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316682.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312095.1 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 5 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1313559.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 4, 2014, 2 pages. |
“Conceptboard”, One-Step Solution for Online Collaboration, retrieved from websites http://conceptboard.com and https://www.youtube.com/user/ConceptboardApp?feature=watch, printed on Jun. 13, 2013, 9 pages. |
“How-to Geek, How to Sync Specific Folders With Dropbox,” downloaded from the internet http://www.howtogeek.com, Apr. 23, 2013, 5 pages. |
“Microsoft Office SharePoint 2007 User Guide,” Feb. 16, 2010, pp. 1-48. |
“Understanding Metadata,” National Information Standards Organization, NISO Press, 2004, 20 pages. |
Cisco, “FTP Load Balancing on ACE in Routed Mode Configuration Example,” DocWiki, Jun. 2011, 7 pages. |
Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” Published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 24 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13158415.3. Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jun. 4, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1300188.8. Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 31, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1306011.6. Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 18, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/012973 dated Apr. 30, 2009, pp. 1-11. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/070366, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 24, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/039126 mailed on Oct. 6, 2011, pp. 1-13. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/041308 Mailed Jul. 2, 2012, pp. 1-16. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/047530, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 22, 2013, pp. 1-10. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/056472 mailed on Jun. 22, 2012, pp. 1-12. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/057938, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/060875 Mailed Oct. 30, 2012, pp. 1-10. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/056955, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 27, 2013, pp. 1-11. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/063041, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/065617, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067126, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/020267, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed May 7, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/023889, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 24, 2013, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/029520, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034662, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed May 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/035404, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 26, 2013, 13 pages. |
Internet Forums, http://web.archive.org/web/2010052819550/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet—forums, Wikipedia, May 30, 2010, pp. 1-20. |
Langfeld L. et al., “Microsoft SharePoint 2003 Unleashed,” Chapters 11 and 15, Jun. 2004, pp. 403-404, 557-561, 578-581. |
Lars, “35 Very Useful Online Tools for Improving your project Management and Team Collaboration,” Apr. 31, 2010, tripwiremagazine.com. pp. 1-32. |
Palmer, “Load Balancing FTP Servers.” BlogNav, Oct. 2008, 2 pages. |
Parr, “Google Docs Improves Commenting, Adds E-mail Notifications,” Apr. 16, 2011, mashable.com, pp. 1-6. |
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Feb. 27, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
Supplementary European Search Report European Application No. EP 08 85 8563 dated Jun. 20, 2011 pp. 1-5. |
Wayback, “Wayback machine,” Wayback, Jun. 1, 2011, 1 page. |
Wiki, http://web.archive.org/web/20100213004936/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki, Feb. 13, 2010, pp. 1-16. |
Yahoo! Groups, http://web.archive.org/web/20090320101529/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!—Groups, Wikipedia, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1-6. |
Exam Report for GB1410569.6 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jul. 11, 2014, 9 pages. |
“Revolving sync conflicts; frequently asked questions,” Microsoft Tech Support, Jul. 16, 2012, retrieved from the internet: http://web.archive.org/web, 2 pages. |
“Troubleshoot sync problems,” Microsoft Tech Support: May 2, 2012, retrieved from the internet, http://web. Archive.org/web, 3 pages. |
“Tulsa TechFest 2012—Agenda,” retrieved from the website, http://web.archive.org, Oct. 2, 2012, 2 pages. |
Cohen, “Debating the Definition of Cloud Computing Platforms,” retrieved from the internet, http://forbes.com, Feb. 3, 2014, 7 pages. |
Delendik, “Evolving with Web Standards—The Story of PDF .JS,” retrieved from the internet, http://people.mozilla.org, Oct. 12, 2012, 36 pages. |
Delendik, “My PDF .js talk slides from Tulsa TechFest,” retrieved from the internet, http://twitter.com, Oct. 12, 2012, 2 pages. |
Duffy, “The Best File-Syncing Services,” pcmag.com, retrieved from the internet: http://www.pcmag.com, Sep. 28, 2012, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 26, 2014, 6 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318792.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 22, 2014, 2 pages. |
Partial Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 8, 2014, 5 pages. |
Pyle et al., “How to enable Event logging for Offline Files (Client Side Caching) in Windows Vista,” Feb. 18, 2009, retrieved from the internet: http://blogs.technet.com, 3 pages. |
Rao, “Box Acquires Crocodoc To Add HTML5 Document Converter And Sleek Content Viewing Experience To Cloud Storage Platform,” retrieved from the internet, http://techcrunch.com, May 9, 2013, 8 pages. |
Search Report for EP13187217.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 8, 2014, 7 pages. |
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, Nov. 2004, 8 pages. |
Tulloch et al., “Windows Vista Resource Kit,” Apr. 8, 2007, Microsoft Press, XP055113067, 6 pages. |
Walker, “PDF.js project meeting notes,” retrieved from the internet, http://groups.google.com, May 15, 2014, 1 page. |
John et al., “Always Sync Support Forums—View topic—Allway sync funny behavior,” Allway Sync Support Forum at http://sync-center.com, Mar. 28, 2011, XP055109680, 2 pages. |
Search Report for EP14151588.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
“PaperPort Professional 14,” PC Mag. Com review, published Feb. 2012, Ziff Davis, Inc., 8 pages. |
“PaperPort.” Wikipedia article (old revision), published May 19, 2012. Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages. |
“Quickoffice Enhances Android Mobile office Application for Improved Productivity on latest Smartphone and Table Devices,” QuickOffice Press Release, Nov. 21, 2011, QuickOffice Inc., 2 pages. |
“QuickOffice,” Wikipedia Article (old revision). published May 9, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13168784.0, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1309209.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 30, 2013, 11 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1310566.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 30, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312095.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 12, 2013, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312874.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 11 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1313559.5, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 22, 2013, 19 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316532.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316533.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 8, 2013, 9 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1316971.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 26, 2013, 10 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1317600.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 8 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1318373.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 17, 2013, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1320902.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 4 pages. |
Gedymin, “Cloud computing with an empahsis on Google App Engine,” Master Final Project, Sep. 2011, 146 pages. |
Google Docs, http://web.Archive.org/web/20100413105756/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google—docs, Apr. 13, 2010, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/039782, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Aug. 28, 2013, 15 pages. |
Patent Court Document of Approved Judgement for GB0602349.3 and GB0623571.7; Mar. 3, 2009, 17 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1311417.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034765, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jan. 20, 2014, 15 pages. |
Exam Report for EP13185269.1. Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jan. 28, 7 pages. |
“Avergae Conversion Time for a D60 RAW file?” http://www.dpreview.com, Jul. 22, 2002, 4 pages. |
Burns, “Developing Secure Mobile Applications for Android,” Oct. 2008, Version 1.0, 1-28 pages. |
Cornes, “MediaXchange User's Manual,” Version 1.15.15, Feb. 1, 2009, pp. 1-90. |
Exam Report for GB1308642.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 10, 2014, 4 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1312264.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
Exam Report for GB1314771.5, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 17, 2014, 7 pages. |
John et al., “Always Sync Support Forums—View topic—Allway sync funny behavior,” Allway Sync Support Forum at http://sync.center.com, Mar. 28, 2011, XP055109680, 2 pages. |
Exam Report for EP 11729851.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 7, 2014, 9 pages. |
Exam Report for EP14151588.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
Exam Report for EP14153783.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140012814 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61668626 | Jul 2012 | US |