Patent Application
20250118167
The present invention generally relates to a system and method for implementing a scratch-off lottery ticket game, and more particularly to a method wherein lottery tickets eligible to win a top tier prize are randomly distributed across multiple jurisdictions.
“Scratch-off” or “instant-win” lottery tickets have enjoyed immense popularity in the lottery industry for decades. These games offer distinct advantages to the lottery authorities and are attractive to a broad spectrum of players.
The scratch-off lottery ticket games typically have a multi-tiered prize structure with relatively few prizes at the top tier level. The number of predetermined winning tickets in each tier increases as the prize tiers are further removed from the top prize tier level. The top prizes can be quite attractive to potential players and are often advertised extensively to draw players to the game.
Particularly in Europe and the U.S., multi-jurisdictional games exist wherein a common scratch-off lottery ticket game is played across multiple jurisdictions, such as separate countries in Europe or separate states in the U.S. These games have a common prize structure wherein the number and value of prizes (including the top tier prizes) are predetermined based on the payout of the game and the total number of tickets allocated to the game. For example, a game having five million tickets provided throughout the jurisdictions may have five top tier prizes (and a number of lesser tier prizes), whereas a game having twenty million tickets provided throughout the jurisdictions with the same payout percentage may have twenty top tier prizes (and a number of lesser tier prizes). All of the prizes (including the top tier prizes) are randomly distributed throughout the jurisdictions. Thus, it is possible that one or more of the jurisdictions may not receive a top tier prize ticket, or even that a single jurisdiction may receive all of the top tier prize tickets.
With the conventional practice, each jurisdiction is provided with a validation file for the lottery tickets provided to the jurisdiction, the validation file containing a record of each winning lottery ticket within the jurisdiction. Thus, the jurisdiction is aware of the number of top tier prize tickets that can possibly be won by patrons within the jurisdiction. This situation creates a dilemma for the jurisdictions. Specifically, a jurisdiction may offer lottery tickets to its citizens advertising the chance to win a top tier prize (e.g., “Win a top prize of $1 Million!”) yet be aware (from the validation file) that no top tier prize tickets are even available for sale in the jurisdiction. Even if one or more top tier prize tickets were initially available and known to the jurisdiction, the same dilemma exists when the jurisdiction becomes aware that these winning tickets have been redeemed and no more top tier prize tickets exist in the jurisdiction but may still be available in other jurisdictions.
Certain lottery jurisdictions around the world (particularly in the U.S. and Europe) have adopted the practice of publicizing to patrons on a periodic basis (e.g., daily or weekly) the number of prizes remaining in each tier of the prize structure for individual scratch-off lottery ticket games. For various reasons (which may include consideration of the dilemma discussed above), these jurisdictions will also terminate the game when all of the top tier prizes have been awarded. For example, if a particular game has three top prizes worth $500,000 each, the game will end when the last of the three $500,000 prizes has been awarded. The unsold scratch-off lottery tickets remaining in the game are pulled from the point-of-sale locations and are typically destroyed.
The above-described practice is, however, disadvantageous in certain respects. Scratch-off lottery ticket games have a design payout based on play of a percentage of the complete run of lottery tickets in the game (the total number of tickets printed and made available for sale and play of the game). For example, a particular game may have a ticket run of ten million tickets with a designed payout of 50%, meaning that half of the money generated by ticket sales is paid out as prizes and the other half of the money constitutes lottery revenue for the jurisdiction. If a game is prematurely ended after the top prizes have been awarded, the payout percentage can be significantly increased to the detriment of the jurisdiction. For example, the game mentioned above having a ticket run of ten million tickets may be terminated after the sale of only two million of the tickets because the three top prizes were awarded. The lottery jurisdiction then loses the revenue from the sale of up to eight million additional tickets. The payout percentage at the early termination of the game may be, for example, 70% of the proceeds generated by sale of the two million tickets, which is significantly greater than the 50% designed payout.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,153,206 proposes an instant lottery ticket game structure includes a ticket validation file containing prize codes for at least some of the lottery tickets (i.e., at least the winning tickets). Provision is made for certain of the instant lottery tickets to have a variable redemption value by allowing the prize codes in the validation file to be changed under certain predetermined circumstances. These tickets, whether printed or electronically simulated, are provided with play indicia under a removable coating that indicates that the redemption value of that lottery ticket is variable. Using the host computer, a lottery administration can change the prize codes and therefore the redemption value of these instant lottery tickets according to the predetermined criteria such as the termination of a game. In some cases, a player can have the option to redeem an instant lottery ticket for a first value or wait until after termination of the game where a possibly higher redemption value might be assigned to that ticket due to the host computer randomly selecting that ticket to change its prize code to a greater value.
The industry, lottery jurisdictions, and public in general would benefit from additional improved methods and game systems to alleviate the dilemma and consequences discussed above that are faced by jurisdictions in a multi-jurisdictional game.
Objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
In accordance with aspects of the invention, a method is provided for implementing an instant lottery ticket game system played by a plurality of jurisdictions. The jurisdictions may be, for example, a state, region, or other municipality that has authorized the play of lottery games within its borders or boundaries. For example, in the United States, each state may be considered as a separate jurisdiction. In Europe, each country may be considered as a separate jurisdiction, or regions within a country may be considered as separate jurisdictions. The lottery game systems are generally provided to the jurisdictions by a third-party game provider that may also administer certain administrative and accounting aspects of the games.
The method includes designating a first set of instant lottery tickets in a primary game to be printed for each of the jurisdictions, wherein each of the first sets comprises a predetermined fixed prize structure having a defined number of top prizes and a defined number of lesser prizes in the primary game. The instant lottery tickets may be paper or electronically printed (virtual) scratch-off lottery tickets. These first sets of instant lottery tickets may share a game theme, with each of the first sets within a jurisdiction having a predetermined fixed prize structure for the primary game that includes a defined number of top prizes and a defined number of lesser prizes. The fixed prize structure may be a multi-tiered structure that includes at least one top tier prize and a plurality of prizes at lower-tier prize levels that decrease in value from the top tier prize.
The method includes defining a total number of supplemental prizes that are separate from the fixed prize structures and designating a set of supplemental lottery tickets associated with the supplemental prizes, wherein a total number of the supplemental lottery tickets is at least equal to the total number of the supplemental prizes.
The method includes assigning a subset of the supplemental lottery tickets to each of the first sets of instant lottery tickets provided to the respective jurisdictions. This assigning process may be done randomly or according to a defined distribution pattern. After assigning the supplemental lottery tickets, the method includes randomly assigning each of the supplemental prizes to one of the supplemental lottery tickets such that the supplemental prizes are randomly distributed throughout the first sets to be distributed to the jurisdictions. The method includes printing and distributing the first sets of instant lottery tickets with the supplemental lottery tickets located therein to the jurisdictions.
In a particular embodiment of the method, the supplemental prizes include a total number of supplemental top prizes at least equal in number to a total number of the top prizes in all of the first sets of instant lottery tickets. The supplemental top prizes can be equal to, greater than, or less than the value of the top prizes in the primary game.
In certain embodiments, the supplemental prizes include a plurality of lesser prizes.
The number of supplemental lottery tickets assigned to each of the subsets provided to the respective jurisdictions may be determined randomly or based on a pro rata number of the instant lottery tickets provided to each of the jurisdictions. Thus, a jurisdiction that takes a greater percentage of the instant lottery tickets in the primary game will receive a greater percentage of the supplemental lottery tickets.
In a further embodiment, the supplemental lottery tickets and the instant lottery tickets may have a same outward appearance to a player such that the player and vendors are not aware of the identity of the supplemental lottery tickets until indicia identifying the supplemental lottery tickets is revealed to the player upon removing a scratch-off coating from a play area of the supplemental lottery ticket.
The method may include generating a validation file for each of the first sets of instant lottery tickets, the validation file containing a record for each winning instant lottery ticket in the first set with information to authenticate and allow redemption of the winning tickets in the primary game. These validation files are generally provided by the lottery provider to the individual jurisdictions wherein they are used for various functions, including ticket validation, redemption, and accountability. These validation files for the primary game tickets, however, do not contain a record of the supplemental lottery tickets that were seeded into the first set of instant lottery tickets. This embodiment may include the game provider generating a universal validation file that contains a record for at least each of the winning supplemental lottery tickets. At least each winning supplemental lottery ticket contains a code thereon that is linked to its record in the universal validation file. The universal validation file can be maintained by a lottery game provider or other third party to validate the supplemental lottery tickets in a validation process that is separate from a validation process conducted by the jurisdictions on winning instant lottery tickets in the first sets. In certain embodiments, one or more of the supplemental lottery tickets are non-winning tickets and do not have a supplemental prize assigned thereto. In this scenario, it is not necessary for the universal validation file to include a record of these non-winning supplemental lottery tickets.
The present invention also encompasses an instant lottery ticket game system for play in a plurality of jurisdictions. The system includes a first set of instant lottery tickets in a primary game for each of the jurisdictions, wherein each of these first sets comprises a predetermined fixed prize structure having a defined number of top prizes and a defined number of lesser prizes. The system includes a defined total number of supplemental prizes, and a set of supplemental lottery tickets associated with the supplemental prizes. A subset of the supplemental lottery tickets is seeded into each of the first sets of instant lottery tickets in the primary game provided to the respective jurisdictions. Each of the supplemental prizes is randomly assigned to one of the supplemental lottery tickets such that the supplemental prizes are randomly distributed throughout the plurality of jurisdictions in the primary game.
In one embodiment of the system, the supplemental prizes include a total number of supplemental top prizes at least equal in number to a total number of the top prizes in the primary game. This embodiment may also include a plurality of lesser supplemental prizes.
In the system, a total number of the supplemental lottery tickets within each of the subsets may be randomly determined or based on a pro rata number of the instant lottery tickets in the primary game provided to each of the jurisdictions.
In a particular embodiment of the system, the supplemental lottery tickets and the instant lottery tickets comprise a same outward appearance to a player, and wherein indicia identifying the supplemental lottery tickets is under a scratch-off coating in a play area of the supplemental lottery ticket.
Embodiments of the system may include a validation file for each of the first sets of instant lottery tickets in the primary game, the validation file containing a record for each winning instant lottery ticket in the first set of instant lottery tickets but being void of a record of the supplemental lottery tickets seeded into the first sets of instant lottery tickets. These embodiments may further include a universal validation file for the supplemental lottery tickets, the universal validation file containing a record for each winning supplemental lottery ticket. Each winning supplemental lottery ticket includes a code thereon linked to its record in the universal validation file, wherein the universal validation file is maintained by a lottery game provider or other third party for validation and redemption of the winning supplemental lottery tickets.
In an embodiment of the system, one or more of the supplemental lottery tickets are non-winning tickets and do not have a supplemental prize assigned thereto and may or may not have an associated record in the universal validation file.
The instant lottery tickets and the supplemental lottery tickets may be paper or electronic scratch-off lottery tickets having game play indicia under a removable scratch-off coating.
A full and enabling disclosure including the best mode of practicing the appended claims and directed to one of ordinary skill in the art is set forth more particularly in the remainder of the specification. The specification makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
Reference will now be made in detail to various and alternative exemplary embodiments and to the accompanying drawings, with like numerals representing substantially identical structural elements. Each example is provided by way of explanation, and not as a limitation. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications and variations can be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure and claims. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment may be used on another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present disclosure includes modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Generally, the present disclosure is directed to an instant lottery ticket game system 10 and method 100 (
Referring to
The present method and system include designating a first set 14 of instant lottery tickets 16 in a primary (“syndicate”) game 18 to each of the jurisdictions 12, which may be paper or electronic scratch-off lottery tickets. These first sets 14 of instant lottery tickets may share a game theme, such as a sports or holiday theme, and art typically printed and provided to the jurisdictions 12 in “blocks” having a fixed number of tickets and a fixed, multi-tiered prize structure as depicted in
Referring to
Still referring to
At a time subsequent to the seeding of the supplemental lottery tickets 28 into the first sets 14 of the primary game tickets 16, the method 100 includes randomly assigning each of the supplemental prizes 26 to one of the supplemental lottery tickets 28. In this manner, the supplemental prizes 26 are, in essence, randomly distributed throughout the plurality of jurisdictions A-C. Thus, the individual jurisdictions may or may not be aware of the total number of supplemental lottery tickets 28 that are contained in their respective first set 14 of primary game tickets 16, but the jurisdictions are not aware of the particular supplemental prize 26 assigned to any specific supplemental lottery ticket 28. In addition, if the supplemental lottery tickets 28 were randomly seeded into the first set 14, the individual jurisdiction is also not aware of the location of the supplemental lottery tickets 28 within the first set 14 of primary game tickets.
Still referring to
It should be appreciated that, in another embodiment, the supplemental prizes 26 may include a single top prize 27 having a greater value than the top prizes 22 in the fixed prize structures of the first sets 14.
As depicted in
The number of supplemental lottery tickets 28 assigned to each of the subsets 14 provided to the respective jurisdictions may be determined in various ways. In one example, this number may be based on a pro rata number of the instant lottery tickets 16 provided to each of the jurisdictions in the primary game 18. Thus, a jurisdiction that purchases a greater percentage of the instant lottery tickets 16 in the primary game 18 will receive a greater percentage of the supplemental lottery tickets 28. For instance, in
In another embodiment, the number of supplemental tickets assigned to each of the subsets 14 provided to the respective jurisdictions may be randomly determined.
The algorithms and systems used for designing scratch-off lottery ticket games are well-known to lottery ticket providers. These systems and their highly secure control processors can be programmed to perform the steps discussed above, including determining the correct number of supplemental lottery tickets 28 for each jurisdiction and performing the random and secret assignment of the supplemental prizes 27, 29 to the tickets 28. Once the random assignment of the supplemental prizes 27, 29 has been made, the highly secure printing processors will ensure that the supplemental lottery tickets 28 will be randomly seeded and printed within the correct sets 14 of instant tickets 16 for the respective jurisdictions A-C, as depicted by steps 40 in
Referring to
Referring again to
The validation files 36 for the primary game tickets 16 do not, however, contain a record or information of the winning supplemental lottery tickets 28 that were seeded into the first sets 14 of instant lottery tickets 16 in the primary game. Thus, none of the jurisdictions are aware of the location of the supplemental lottery tickets 28.
For authenticating and redemption of the supplemental lottery tickets 28, the game provider 20 may generate a universal validation file 38 that contains a record for at least each of the winning supplemental lottery tickets 28 (and may contain a record for non-winning supplemental lottery tickets 28). Referring to
In certain embodiments, one or more of the supplemental lottery tickets 28 are non-winning tickets and do not have a supplemental prize 26 assigned thereto. In this scenario, it is not necessary for the universal validation file 38 to include a record of these non-winning supplemental lottery tickets 28.
As depicted at steps 42 in
Those skilled in the art appreciate that the present methods and systems may be implemented by conventional technology that may include servers, computers, databases, software applications, and other computer-based systems, as well as actions taken and information sent to and from such systems. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the inherent flexibility of computer-based systems allows for a great variety of possible configurations, combinations, and divisions of tasks and functionality between and among components. For instance, server processes discussed herein may be implemented using a single server or multiple servers working in combination. Databases and applications may be implemented on a single system or distributed across multiple systems. Distributed components may operate sequentially or in parallel.
The material particularly shown and described above is not meant to be limiting, but instead serves to show and teach various exemplary implementations of the present subject matter. As set forth in the attached claims, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and sub-combinations of various features discussed herein, along with such variations and modifications as would occur to a person of skill in the art.
