The present disclosure relates to an electrosurgical system and method for operating an electrosurgical generator. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a system, method and apparatus for controlling electrosurgical waveforms generated by a radiofrequency resonant inverter that are suitable for arc cutting and coagulation.
Electrosurgery involves application of high radio frequency electrical current to a surgical site to cut, ablate, or coagulate tissue. In monopolar electrosurgery, a source or active electrode delivers radio frequency alternating current from the electrosurgical generator to the targeted tissue and a return electrode conducts the current back to the generator. A patient return electrode is placed remotely from the active electrode to conduct the current back to the generator.
In bipolar electrosurgery return and active electrodes are placed in close proximity to each other such that an electrical circuit is formed between the two electrodes (e.g., in the case of an electrosurgical forceps). In this manner, the applied electrical current is limited to the body tissue positioned between the electrodes. Accordingly, bipolar electrosurgery generally involves the use of instruments where it is desired to achieve a focused delivery of electrosurgical energy between two electrodes positioned on the instrument, e.g. forceps or the like. A forceps is a pliers-like instrument which relies on mechanical action between its jaws to grasp, clamp and constrict vessels or tissue. Electrosurgical forceps (open or endoscopic) utilize mechanical clamping action and electrical energy to effect hemostasis on the clamped tissue. The forceps include electrosurgical conductive surfaces which apply the electrosurgical energy to the clamped tissue. By controlling the intensity, frequency and duration of the electrosurgical energy applied through the conductive plates to the tissue, the surgeon can coagulate, cauterize and/or seal tissue. However, the above example is for illustrative purposes only and there are many other known bipolar electrosurgical instruments which are within the scope of the present disclosure.
Electrosurgical procedures outlined above may utilize various tissue and energy parameters in a feedback-based control system. There is continual need to improve delivery of energy to the tissue.
The present disclosure provides a method for controlling an electrosurgical generator. The method including: generating the at least one electrosurgical waveform through an RF output stage including a pulse-width-modulator coupled to an RF inverter, which is coupled to a power source configured to output DC current; applying at least one electrosurgical waveform to tissue through at least one electrode, the at least one electrosurgical waveform including a plurality of cycles; measuring a voltage and a current of the at least one electrosurgical waveform; calculating at least one of a voltage limit or a current limit; and supplying a control signal to the pulse-width modulator based on at least one of the voltage limit or the current limit to saturate the RF output stage based on the voltage-current characteristics of the RF output stage.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the RF output stage includes at least one switching element coupled to a controller.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the controller includes a proportional-integral-derivative controller and a pulse-width-modulator, wherein the pulse-width-modulator is configured to output the control signal to the at least one switching element and adjust a duty cycle of the control signal based on an output of proportional-integral-derivative controller.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the controller is configured to determine impedance based on the measured voltage and current.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the proportional-integral-derivative controller is configured to provide the output based on the impedance.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the proportional-integral-derivative controller includes a voltage limiter function.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the proportional-integral-derivative controller includes a current limiter function.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the method further includes generating DC current at power supply coupled to the RF output stage; and supplying the control signal to the power supply based on at least one of the voltage limit or the current limit to saturate the RF output stage based on the voltage-current characteristics of the RF output stage.
The present disclosure also provides an electrosurgical generator, including: an RF output stage configured to generate at least one electrosurgical waveform including a plurality of cycles; at least one sensor coupled to the RF output stage, the at least one sensor configured to measure a voltage and a current of the at least one electrosurgical waveform; and a controller coupled to the at least one sensor and the RF output stage, the controller including a proportional-integral-derivative controller having at least one of voltage limiter or a current limiter, the proportional-integral-derivative controller configured saturate the RF output stage based on the voltage-current characteristics of the RF output stage.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the RF output stage includes an RF inverter coupled to a power source configured to output DC current.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the RF inverter includes at least one switching element coupled to the controller.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the controller includes a pulse-width-modulator configured to output a control signal to the at least one switching element and adjust a duty cycle of the control signal based on an output of proportional-integral-derivative controller.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the controller is configured to determine impedance based on the measured voltage and current.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the proportional-integral-derivative controller is configured to provide the output based on the impedance.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the controller is further configured to increase the current of the at least one electrosurgical waveform to increase the generation of the electrical discharges.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the generator further including a power supply having an AC-DC converter coupled to the RF output stage, wherein the RF output stage includes an DC-AC inverter.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the controller is coupled to the DC-AC inverter.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, the power supply further includes a DC-DC converter coupled to the AC-DC converter and the RF output stage, the DC-DC converter being coupled to and controllable by the controller.
The present disclosure also provides an electrosurgical system, including: an electrosurgical generator having: a power supply configured to output DC current; an RF output stage coupled to the power supply, the power supply including at least one switching element configured to generate at least one electrosurgical waveform including a plurality of cycles from the DC current; at least one sensor coupled to the RF output stage, the at least one sensor configured to measure a voltage and a current of the at least one electrosurgical waveform; and a controller coupled to the at least one sensor and at least one of the RF output stage or the power supply, the controller including a proportional-integral-derivative controller having at least one of voltage limiter or a current limiter, the proportional-integral-derivative controller configured to saturate at least one of the RF output stage or the power supply based on the voltage-current characteristics of the RF output stage.
The system also includes at least one electrosurgical instrument configured to couple to the electrosurgical generator and to supply the at least one electrosurgical waveform to a tissue.
According to additional aspects of the above embodiment, wherein the controller is configured to determine impedance based on the measured voltage and current and the proportional-integral-derivative controller is configured to provide the output based on the impedance.
Various embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to the drawings wherein:
Particular embodiments of the present disclosure are described hereinbelow with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the following description, well-known functions or constructions are not described in detail to avoid obscuring the present disclosure in unnecessary detail.
A generator according to the present disclosure can perform monopolar and/or bipolar electrosurgical procedures, including, for example, cutting, coagulation, ablation, and vessel sealing procedures. The generator may include a plurality of outputs for interfacing with various electrosurgical instruments (e.g., a monopolar instrument, return electrode, bipolar electrosurgical forceps, footswitch, etc.). Further, the generator includes electronic circuitry configured to generate radio frequency energy specifically suited for various electrosurgical modes (e.g., cut, blend, coagulate, division with hemostasis, fulgurate, spray, etc.) and procedures (e.g., monopolar, bipolar, vessel sealing). In embodiments, the generator may be embedded, integrated or otherwise coupled to the electrosurgical instruments providing for an all-in-one electrosurgical apparatus.
The system 1 may also include one or more bipolar electrosurgical instruments, for example, a bipolar electrosurgical forceps 10 having one or more electrodes for treating tissue of a patient. The electrosurgical forceps 10 includes a housing 11 and opposing jaw members 13 and 15 disposed at a distal end of a shaft 12. The jaw members 13 and 15 have one or more active electrodes 14 and a return electrode 16 disposed therein, respectively. The active electrode 14 and the return electrode 16 are connected to the generator 200 through cable 18 that includes the supply and return lines 4, 8 coupled to the active and return terminals 230, 232, respectively (
With reference to
The generator 200 includes a user interface 241 having one or more display screens or information panels 242, 244, 246 for providing the user with variety of output information (e.g., intensity settings, treatment complete indicators, etc.). Each of the screens 242, 244, 246 is associated with corresponding connector 250, 252, 254, 256, 258, 260, 262. The generator 200 includes suitable input controls (e.g., buttons, activators, switches, touch screen, etc.) for controlling the generator 200. The display screens 242, 244, 246 are also configured as touch screens that display a corresponding menu for the electrosurgical instruments (e.g., electrosurgical forceps 10, etc.). The user then adjusts inputs by simply touching corresponding menu options.
Screen 242 controls monopolar output and the devices connected to the connectors 250 and 252. Connector 250 is configured to couple to a monopolar electrosurgical instrument (e.g., electrosurgical instrument 2) and connector 252 is configured to couple to a foot switch (not shown). The foot switch provides for additional inputs (e.g., replicating inputs of the generator 200). Screen 244 controls monopolar and bipolar output and the devices connected to the connectors 256 and 258. Connector 256 is configured to couple to other monopolar instruments. Connector 258 is configured to couple to a bipolar instrument (not shown).
Screen 246 controls bipolar sealing procedures performed by the forceps 10 that may be plugged into the connectors 260 and 262. The generator 200 outputs energy through the connectors 260 and 262 suitable for sealing tissue grasped by the forceps 10. In particular, screen 246 outputs a user interface that allows the user to input a user-defined intensity setting. The user-defined setting may be any setting that allows the user to adjust one or more energy delivery parameters, such as power, current, voltage, energy, etc. or sealing parameters, such as energy rate limiters, sealing duration, etc. The user-defined setting is transmitted to the controller 224 where the setting may be saved in memory 226. In embodiments, the intensity setting may be a number scale, such as for example, from one to ten or one to five. In embodiments, the intensity setting may be associated with an output curve of the generator 200. The intensity settings may be specific for each forceps 10 being utilized, such that various instruments provide the user with a specific intensity scale corresponding to the forceps 10.
The controller 224 includes a processor 225 operably connected to a memory 226, which may include transitory type memory (e.g., RAM) and/or non-transitory type memory (e.g., flash media, disk media, etc.). The processor 225 includes an output port that is operably connected to the power supply 227 and/or RF amplifier 228 allowing the processor 225 to control the output of the generator 200 according to either open and/or closed control loop schemes. A closed loop control scheme is a feedback control loop, in which a plurality of sensors measure a variety of tissue and energy properties (e.g., tissue impedance, tissue temperature, output power, current and/or voltage, etc.), and provide feedback to the controller 224. The controller 224 then signals the power supply 227 and/or RF amplifier 228, which adjusts the DC and/or power supply, respectively. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the processor 225 may be substituted by using any logic processor (e.g., control circuit) adapted to perform the calculations and/or set of instructions described herein including, but not limited to, field programmable gate array, digital signal processor, and combinations thereof.
The generator 200 according to the present disclosure includes a plurality of sensors 280, e.g., an RF current sensor 280a, and an RF voltage sensor 280b. Various components of the generator 200, namely, the RF amplifier 228, the RF current and voltage sensors 280a and 280b, may be disposed on a printed circuit board (PCB). The RF current sensor 280a is coupled to the active terminal 230 and provides measurements of the RF current supplied by the RF amplifier 228. The RF voltage sensor 280b is coupled to the active and return terminals 230 and 232 provides measurements of the RF voltage supplied by the RF amplifier 228. In embodiments, the RF current and voltage sensors 280a and 280b may be coupled to active and return leads 228a and 228b, which interconnect the active and return terminals 230 and 232 to the RF amplifier 228, respectively.
The RF current and voltage sensors 280a and 280b provide the sensed RF voltage and current signals, respectively, to the controller 224, which then may adjust output of the power supply 227 and/or the RF amplifier 228 in response to the sensed RF voltage and current signals. The controller 224 also receives input signals from the input controls of the generator 200, the instrument 2 and/or forceps 10. The controller 224 utilizes the input signals to adjust power outputted by the generator 200 and/or performs other control functions thereon.
With continued reference to
As shown in
With continued reference to
The processor 225 is coupled to the user interface 241 and is configured to modify modes, energy settings, and other parameters of the generator 200 in response to user input. The processor 225 includes a mode initializer 308 which is configured to initialize a selected operating mode. The generator 200 is configured to operate in a variety of modes. In one embodiment, the generator 200 may output the following modes: cut, blend, coagulate, division with hemostasis, fulgurate, spray, combinations thereof, and the like. Each mode operates based on a pre-programmed power curve that controls the amount of power that is output by the generator 200 at varying impedances of the load (e.g., tissue). Each power curve includes power, voltage and current control ranges that are defined by the user-selected power setting and the measured impedance of the load.
In the cut mode, the generator 200 may supply a continuous sine wave output having a plurality of RF cycles at a predetermined frequency (e.g., 472 kHz) with a crest factor of about 1.414 over an impedance range of from about 100Ω to about 2,000Ω. The cut mode power curve may include three regions: constant current into low impedance, constant power into medium impedance and constant voltage into high impedance. In the blend mode, the generator may supply alternating bursts of a sine wave output at a predetermined periodic rate, with the burst cycles reoccurring at a first predetermined rate (e.g., about 26.21 kHz), each burst cycle includes a plurality of sine wave RF cycles at the predetermined frequency (e.g., 472 kHz). In one embodiment, the duty cycle of the bursts may be about 50%. In other words, for each burst cycle the power is on for 50% of the time and it is off for 50% of the time. The crest factor of one period of the sine wave output may be about 1.414. The crest factor of one burst cycle may be about 2.7.
The division with hemostasis mode may include bursts of sine wave outputs at a predetermined frequency (e.g., 472 kHz) reoccurring at a second predetermined rate (e.g., about 28.3 kHz). The duty cycle of the bursts may be about 25%, i.e. the power is on for 25% of each cycle and off for the remaining 75% of the cycle. The crest factor of one burst cycle may be about 4.3 across an impedance of from about 100Ω to about 2,000Ω. The fulgurate mode may include bursts of sine wave outputs at a predetermined frequency (e.g., 472 kHz) reoccurring at a third predetermined rate (e.g., about 30.66 kHz). The duty cycle of the bursts may be about 6.5% and the crest factor of one burst cycle may be about 5.55 across an impedance range of from about 100Ω to about 2,000Ω. The spray mode may include bursts of a sine wave output at a predetermined frequency (e.g., 472 kHz) reoccurring at a fourth predetermined rate (e.g., about 21.7 kHz). The duty cycle of the bursts may be about 4.6% and the crest factor of one burst cycle may be about 6.6 across the impedance range of from about 100Ω to about 2,000Ω.
The processor 225 further includes a mode state control 310 which is configured to maintain energy output of the generator 200 according to the parameters set by the mode initializer 308. The mode state control 310 controls the RF amplifier 228 based on the sensor signals from the sensors 280 using a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control loop 312 with a control output limited by a voltage and/or current output amplitude limiter function 315 that includes saturation and integral anti-windup capabilities for the PID implemented in the processor 225.
The processor 225 includes an analog front-end (AFE) 307 for interfacing between the sensors 280 and the signal processor 316. The AFE 307 may include a plurality of analog-to-digital converters and other circuit components for receiving and converting analog signals from the sensors into digital counterparts thereof. The AFE 307 provides the digitized sensor signals to a signal processor 316. The signal processor 316 may also calculate various energy and/or tissue properties based on sensor signals including, but not limited to, impedance, voltage, current, power, time duration, as well as instantaneous, average, root-mean-square values, and combinations thereof.
The generator 200 provides closed-loop control of various electrosurgical modes, e.g., arc cutting and coagulation, based on current, power and voltage bounds inherent to voltage-current characteristics of a resonant inverter of the RF amplifier 228. The voltage-current characteristic of any resonant inverter, when plotted, forms an ellipse bounded by voltage and current limited regions due to the output impedance of the resonant network. This output impedance of the inverter may be designed to be centered upon the geometric mean of the expected minimum to maximum terminating resistances observed during operation in the electrosurgical mode (e.g. the resistance of the tissue). The operating characteristics of the RF amplifier 228 may then be aligned to coincide with the maximum voltage and current of the particular power setting requested by the user.
Conventional generators supply electrosurgical energy to tissue at constant power over some specified range of load resistance. Closed-loop control algorithms have been introduced since open-loop control algorithms were insufficient for covering a wide range of tissue impedance loads encountered during various surgical procedures. In certain embodiments, a combination of open and closed loop controls were utilized as disclosed in a commonly-owned U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006/0161148, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Certain modes, such as arc cut and coagulation modes, present a unique problem for closed-loop control using a voltage-source-based inverter. During operation, arcing is generated to achieve desired surgical effects. High arc currents are well-suited for their hemostasis effects; however, to limit thermal transfer, it is also desirable to also limit arcing. In particular, arcing in the coagulation modes is interrupted to provide for high enough instantaneous power to create hemostasis, while keeping average power low enough to minimize thermal spread. The present disclosure provides for inverters that are configured to control arcing to achieve these goals with a minimal amount of required heuristics or state changes performed by the mode state control 310 and/or the PID 312. In particular, the present disclosure provides for inverters that accomplish this by maintaining zero-voltage switching for all loads at all amplitudes, maintaining constant power over a desired range of tissue impedances, and limiting the current and voltage using the saturation and integral anti-windup capabilities of the PID controller by taking advantage of the voltage-current lossless output characteristic of the RF amplifier 228 at a predetermined maximum control output amplitude.
The RF amplifier 228 operates within its lossless voltage-current output characteristic ellipse substantially as a voltage, power or current source depending on the terminating load resistance. With respect to
With respect to
Maximum power transfer from a power source, e.g. RF amplifier 228, occurs at its matched impedance, when the output impedance is substantially the same as the load impedance. Ideal voltage and current sources do not have Thevenin and Norton equivalent source impedances as illustrated in
Maximum power transfer for ideal voltage and current sources may also be represented as a power plot as a function of impedance as illustrated in
In embodiments, arc control may be accomplished by measuring and limiting instantaneous current, voltage, and/or power using very high sample rates, e.g., digital sampling combined with correspondingly fast circuit components for limit current, e.g., current foldback circuitry as described in more detail below. In further embodiments, matched impedance may be increased and the RF amplifier 228 may be operated as a current source. In particular, output impedance may be increased to be higher than the expected impedance during arcing. Output impedance may be from about two to about six times higher than the highest expected impedance, in embodiments output impedance may be about four times higher than expected impedance. This provides a natural power limiting function once voltage is limited.
In another embodiment, output impedance may include multiple output impedances that are selected by the user and/or the generator 200 depending on the tissue type. In a further embodiment, characteristic output impedance of the generator 200 may be selected to be a geometric mean of maximum and minimum impedances and limited maximum output amplitude of the DC-AC inverter 302 such that the elliptical voltage-current response occurs at the coincidence of the current and voltage limits as illustrated in
In specific embodiments, the RF amplifier 228 may be configured as a square wave current source. Waveform characteristics of a square-wave current source are shown in
With reference to
The RF amplifiers 328 of
In further embodiments, a duty cycle as a function of impedance curve may be used as shown in
In embodiments in which the electrosurgical waveform is pulsatile, upon detecting arc discharges, the generator 200 may increase the time between pulses of the electrosurgical waveform (e.g., lower the duty cycle) to allow the electrode 3 to cool. In another embodiment, the generator 200 may reduce the current to prevent the electrode 3 from overheating. Conversely, shortening the time between pulses may be used to insure that arcs are generated when arcing is desired (e.g., cutting). The adjustments to the generator 200 may be embodied in either hardware and/or software to be performed automatically or in response to user input (e.g., entering pulse delay). In a further embodiment, the generator 200 is configured to detect a resistive contact between the electrode 3 and the tissue (e.g., 0 V simultaneous with 0 A) and increase power and/or voltage to initiate arc discharges or lower power or voltage to extinguish arc discharges.
While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings and/or described herein, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of particular embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.
The present application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/789,005 filed on Mar. 15, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3952748 | Kaliher | Apr 1976 | A |
4430625 | Yokoyama | Feb 1984 | A |
4661766 | Hoffman | Apr 1987 | A |
4959606 | Forge | Sep 1990 | A |
5249121 | Baum et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5318563 | Malis et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5396194 | Williamson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5559688 | Pringle | Sep 1996 | A |
5596466 | Ochi | Jan 1997 | A |
5694304 | Telefus et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712772 | Telefus et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5777519 | Simopoulos | Jul 1998 | A |
5936446 | Lee | Aug 1999 | A |
6017354 | Culp et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6061254 | Takegami | May 2000 | A |
6090123 | Culp et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104248 | Carver | Aug 2000 | A |
6329778 | Culp et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6440157 | Shigezawa et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6620189 | Machold et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6684873 | Anderson | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6723091 | Goble et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740079 | Eggers et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6923804 | Eggers et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939347 | Thompson | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7041096 | Malis et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062331 | Zarinetchi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7324357 | Miura et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
D574323 | Waaler | Aug 2008 | S |
7422582 | Malackowski et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7517351 | Culp et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7863841 | Menegoli et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8349174 | Bedingfield | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20020022836 | Goble | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020052599 | Goble | May 2002 | A1 |
20030181898 | Bowers | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040179829 | Phillips | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050004564 | Wham | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050109111 | Manlove et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109935 | Manlove et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060161148 | Behnke | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070173805 | Weinberg | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070270924 | McCann | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080082095 | Shores | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080219032 | Stancu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090146635 | Qiu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090244943 | Yamada et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090257254 | Leu | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100207543 | Crawford | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110071518 | Gilbert | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120095461 | Herscher et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120119697 | Boys et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120215216 | Friedrichs | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130066311 | Smith | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130193952 | Krapohl | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150088118 | Gilbert | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1134028 | Oct 1996 | CN |
102460895 | May 2012 | CN |
204158485 | Feb 2015 | CN |
179607 | Mar 1905 | DE |
390937 | Mar 1924 | DE |
1099658 | Feb 1961 | DE |
1139927 | Nov 1962 | DE |
1149832 | Jun 1963 | DE |
1439302 | Jan 1969 | DE |
2439587 | Feb 1975 | DE |
2455174 | May 1975 | DE |
2407559 | Aug 1975 | DE |
2602517 | Jul 1976 | DE |
2504280 | Aug 1976 | DE |
2540968 | Mar 1977 | DE |
2820908 | Nov 1978 | DE |
2803275 | Aug 1979 | DE |
2823291 | Nov 1979 | DE |
2946728 | May 1981 | DE |
3143421 | May 1982 | DE |
3045996 | Jul 1982 | DE |
3120102 | Dec 1982 | DE |
3510586 | Oct 1986 | DE |
3604823 | Aug 1987 | DE |
3904558 | Aug 1990 | DE |
3942998 | Jul 1991 | DE |
4206433 | Sep 1993 | DE |
4339049 | May 1995 | DE |
19506363 | Aug 1996 | DE |
19717411 | Nov 1998 | DE |
19848540 | May 2000 | DE |
10 2008058737 | Apr 2010 | DE |
0 246 350 | Nov 1987 | EP |
267403 | May 1988 | EP |
296777 | Dec 1988 | EP |
310431 | Apr 1989 | EP |
325456 | Jul 1989 | EP |
336742 | Oct 1989 | EP |
390937 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 556 705 | Aug 1993 | EP |
608609 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0 836 868 | Apr 1998 | EP |
880220 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 882 955 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1051948 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1366724 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1519472 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1776929 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2469699 | Jun 2012 | EP |
1 275 415 | Nov 1961 | FR |
1 347 865 | Jan 1964 | FR |
2 313 708 | Dec 1976 | FR |
2364461 | Apr 1978 | FR |
2 502 935 | Oct 1982 | FR |
2 517 953 | Jun 1983 | FR |
2 573 301 | May 1986 | FR |
63 005876 | Jan 1988 | JP |
11299237 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2002-065690 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002075750 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002373812 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2004514398 | May 2004 | JP |
2005102750 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-185657 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2009261210 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2011223667 | Nov 2011 | JP |
166452 | Nov 1964 | SU |
727201 | Apr 1980 | SU |
9639086 | Dec 1996 | WO |
0211634 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0241482 | May 2002 | WO |
0245589 | Jun 2002 | WO |
03090635 | Nov 2003 | WO |
06050888 | May 2006 | WO |
08053532 | May 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Vallfors et al., “Automatically Controlled Bipolar Electrosoagulation-‘COA-COMP’”, Neurosurgical Review 7:2-3 (1984) pp. 187-190. |
Sugita et al., “Bipolar Coagulator with Automatic Thermocontrol”, J. Neurosurg., vol. 41, Dec. 1944, pp. 777-779. |
Prutchi et al. “Design and Development of Medical Electronic Instrumentation”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2005. |
Momozaki et al. “Electrical Breakdown Experiments with Application to Alkali Metal Thermal-to-Electric Converters”, Energy conversion and Management; Elsevier Science Publishers, Oxford, GB; vol. 44, No. 6, Apr. 1, 2003 pp. 819-843. |
Muller et al. “Extended Left Hemicolectomy Using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System”, Innovations That Work; Company Newsletter; Sep. 1999. |
Ogden Goertzel Alternative to the Fourier Transform: Jun. 1993 pp. 485-487, Electronics World; Reed Business Publishing, Sutton, Surrey, BG vol. 99, No. 9. 1687. |
Hadley I C D et al., “Inexpensive Digital Thermometer for Measurements on Semiconductors”, International Journal of Electronics; Taylor and Francis. Ltd.; London, GB; vol. 70, No. 6 Jun. 1, 1991; pp. 1155-1162. |
Burdette et al. “In Vivo Probe Measurement Technique for Determining Dielectric Properties at VHF Through Microwave Frequencies”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-28, No. 4, Apr. 1980 pp. 414-427. |
Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp. Brochure, “Kleppinger Bipolar Forceps & Bipolar Generator”, 3 pp. Jan. 1989. |
Astrahan, “A Localized Current Field Hyperthermia System for Use with 192-Iridium Interstitial Implants” Medical Physics, 9 (3), May/Jun. 1982. |
Alexander et al., “Magnetic Resonance Image-Directed Stereotactic Neurosurgery: Use of Image Fusion with Computerized Tomography to Enhance Spatial Accuracy”, Journal Neurosurgery, 83; (1995) pp. 271-276. |
Geddes et al., “The Measurement of Physiologic Events by Electrical Impedence”, Am. J. MI, Jan. Mar. 1964, pp. 16-27. |
Cosman et al., “Methods of Making Nervous System Lesions”, In William RH, Rengachary SS (eds): Neurosurgery, New York: McGraw-Hill, vol. 111, (1984), pp. 2490-2499. |
Anderson et al., “A Numerical Study of Rapid Heating for High Temperature Radio Frequency Hyperthermia” International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 35 (1994) pp. 297-307. |
Benaron et al., “Optical Time-Of-Flight and Absorbance Imaging of Biologic Media”, Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, vol. 259, Mar. 5, 1993, pp. 1463-1466. |
Cosman et al., “Radiofrequency Lesion Generation and Its Effect on Tissue Impedance”, Applied Neurophysiology 51: (1988) pp. 230-242. |
Zlatanovic M., “Sensors in Diffusion Plasma Processing” Microelectronics 1995; Proceedings 1995; 20th International Conference CE on Nis, Serbia Sep. 12-14, 1995; New York, NY vol. 2 pp. 565-570. |
Ni W. et al. “A Signal Processing Method for the Coriolis Mass Flowmeter Based on a Normalized . . . ”, Journal of Applied Sciences—Yingyong Kexue Xuebao, Shangha CN, vol. 23 No. 2;(Mar. 2005); pp. 160-164. |
Chicharo et al. “A Sliding Goertzel Algorith” Aug. 1996, pp. 283-297, Signal Processing, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Amsterdam, NL vol. 52 No. 3. |
Bergdahl et al., “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” Journal of Neurosurgery 75:1, (Jul. 1991) pp. 148-151. |
Cosman et al., “Theoretical Aspects of Radiofrequency Lesions in the Dorsal Root Entry Zone”, Neurosurgery 15: (1984) pp. 945-950. |
Goldberg et al., “Tissue Ablation with Radiofrequency: Effect of Probe Size, Gauge, Duration, and Temperature on Lesion Volume” Acad Radio (1995) vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 399-404. |
Medtrex Brochure—Total Control at Full Speed, “The O.R. Pro 300”, 1 p. Sep. 1998. |
Valleylab Brochure “Valleylab Electroshield Monitoring System”, 2 pp. Nov. 1995. |
“Electrosurgical Unit Analyzer ESU-2400 Series User Manual” Apr. 1, 2002; Retrieved from Internet: <URL:http://www.bcgroupintl.com/ESU_2400/Updates/ESU-2400_UM_Rev04.pdf>, pp. 6, 11, 73. |
Wald et al., “Accidental Burns”, JAMA, Aug. 16, 1971, vol. 217, No. 7, pp. 916-921. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/406,690, filed Apr. 3, 2003, Michael S. Klicek. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/573,713, filed Mar. 28, 2006, Robert H. Wham. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/761,524, filed Jan. 21, 2004, Robert Wham. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/242,458, filed Oct. 3, 2005, Daniel J. Becker. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/943,518, filed Jul. 16, 2013, Orszulak et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/069,534, filed Nov. 1, 2013, Digmann. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/096,341, filed Dec. 4, 2013, Johnson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,859, filed Dec. 6, 2013, Johnson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/100,113, filed Dec. 9, 2013, Gilbert. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/147,294, filed Jan. 3, 2014, Gilbert. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/147,312, filed Jan. 3, 2014, Gilbert. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/168,296, filed Jan. 30, 2014, Mattmiller. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/174,551, filed Feb. 6, 2014, Johnson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/174,607, filed Feb. 6, 2014, Friedrichs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,724, filed Feb. 13, 2014, Johnson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,965, filed Feb. 14, 2014, Larson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/181,114, filed Feb. 14, 2014, Larson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,797, filed Feb. 18, 2014, Wham. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,196, filed Feb. 18, 2014, Krapohl. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,830, filed Feb. 26, 2014, Johnson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,895, filed Feb. 26, 2014, Gilbert. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,112, filed Feb. 27, 2014, Weinberg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/255,051, filed Apr. 17, 2014, Coulson. |
Extended European Search Report from Appl. No. EP 14159839.1 dated Jul. 8, 2014. |
Chinese Office Action and English language translation issued in Appl. No. CN 201410095399.6 dated Mar. 28, 2017. |
Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2017 issued in corresponding Chinese Appln. No. 201410095399.6. |
European Examination Report dated Nov. 29, 2017 issued in corresponding European Appln. No. 14159839.1. |
Australian Examination Report dated Mar. 28, 2018 issued in corresponding AU Appln. No. 2014201216. |
Japanese Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2018 issued in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2014-052137. |
Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2018 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-051501, with English translation. |
Rejection Decision dated Nov. 1, 2018 issued in corresponding CN Appln. No. 201410093850. |
Japanese Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2018 issued in corresponding JP Appln. No. 2014-052137. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance issued in corresponding JP Appln. No. 2014-052137. (Summary only). |
Canadian Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2020 issued in corresponding CA Appln. No. 2,846,490. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140276754 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61789005 | Mar 2013 | US |