1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to a system and method for processing a High Definition Television (HDTV) image. More particularly, the present invention provides a plurality of encoders connected in parallel and directly attached to a HDTV video source for processing a HDTV image.
2. Background Art
The advent of the High Definition Television (HDTV) standard, and the requirement to perform Moving Pictures Experts Group (MPEG) video compression on images in the HDTV format, has created significant video data processing demands on MPEG-2 encoder Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). Specifically, encoders that compress video data in Standard Definition (SD) format typically process 480 active video lines (i.e., out of a total of 525 lines per video frame) consisting of 720 active luminance and chrominance pixels (i.e., out of a total of 858) at a 13.5 MHz pixel clock rate for an input rate of 30 frames per second. Conversely, a MPEG-2 encoder must typically process incoming HDTV pixel data (e.g., one luminance and one chrominance pixel data byte) 5-6 times faster to yield the same input rate of 30 frames per second. That is, 1080 or 1088 active video lines (i.e., out of a total of 1125 lines per video frame) consisting of 1920 active luminance and chrominance pixels (i.e., out of a total of 2200) per line are scanned into the encoder at a pixel clock rate of 74.25 MHz.
With present technology, it is generally not feasible to for a single MPEG-2 encoder to process/compress HDTV images at full resolution (i.e., 5-6 times faster than for Standard Definition). It is therefore necessary to have a HDTV MPEG-2 video architecture that utilizes multiple encoders to process a single HDTV image at fill resolution. With such an architecture, an image must be split horizontally or vertically into multiple portions for processing by the encoders. In splitting the HDTV image, problems arise in that a large amount of logic and memory, external to the encoders, is required. Specifically, external logic must be provided to buffer and split the HDTV image into smaller portions. The external logic would then send a particular portion of the HDTV image to each of the encoders.
An additional problem often encountered is that many encoders can accept pixel data only at the Standard Definition pixel clock rate of 13.5 MHz. As indicated above, the HDTV pixel clock rate is approximately 74.25 MHz. Thus, the external logic may be forced to accept data at 74.25 MHz, but transmit the data to the encoders at 13.5 MHz. Providing this capability adds more complexity to the external control logic as well as significantly more external memory buffers. Accordingly, the requirement for system designers to include external splitter and control logic (collectively referred to as glue logic) significantly drives up the overall system cost and complexity.
In view of the foregoing, there exists a need for a system and method for processing a HDTV image. In addition, there exists a need for a system and method for directly attaching a plurality of video encoders to a HDTV video source such that external splitter and control logic is not required. In addition, there exists a need for the encoders to be programmable so that each encoder receives an entire HDTV image from the HDTV video source, but processes only a portion thereof.
The present invention provides a system and method for processing a HDTV image. Specifically, the present invention provides a plurality of video encoders connected in parallel and directly (e.g., gluelessly) attached to a HDTV video source. Each of the encoders receives an entire image from the HDTV video source but, through programming, processes only a portion thereof. This architecture obviates the need for splitter and control logic between the encoders and the HDTV video source. This also allows the encoders to receive the image at the HDTV rate of 74.25 MHz.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, a system for processing a High Definition Television (HDTV) image is provided. The system comprises: (1) a plurality of video encoders connected in parallel; (2) wherein each of the encoders receives an entire image from a HDTV video source; and (2) wherein each of the encoders is programable for processing only a portion of the entire image.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, a system for processing a High Definition Television (HDTV) image is provided. The system comprises: (1) a plurality of video encoders connected in parallel and directly attached to a HDTV video source; and (2) wherein each of the encoders receives an entire image from the HDTV video source, and wherein each of the encoders is programable for processing only a portion of the entire image.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, a method for processing a High Definition Television (HDTV) image is provided. The method comprises the steps of: (1) providing a plurality of video encoders connected in parallel and directly attached to a HDTV video source; and (2) programming each of the encoders to process only a portion of an entire image received from the HDTV video source.
Therefore, the present invention provides a system and method for processing a HDTV image.
These and other features of this invention will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the various aspects of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The drawings are merely schematic representations, not intended to portray specific parameters of the invention. The drawings are intended to depict only typical embodiments of the invention, and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope of the invention. In the drawings, like numbering represents like elements.
In general, the present invention provides a system and method for processing a High Definition Television (HDTV) image in which a plurality of encoders are directly/gluelessly attached to a HDTV video source. As indicated above, multiple MPEG-2 encoders are generally required to process a HDTV image because no single encoder can process the entire image. Moreover, most existing MPEG-2 encoders cannot receive HDTV data signals at the HDTV rate of 74.25 MHz. Rather, most encoders must receive the HDTV data signals at the Standard Definition (SD) rate of 13.5 MHz. Accordingly, existing architectures generally require complex splitter and control logic to be interposed between the encoders and the HDTV video source. The splitter logic will partition each HDTV image into portions, and feed each encoder with a single portion. The control logic will slow the HDTV data signals down to the SD rate of 13.5 MHz so that the encoders can accurately process the images therein. As indicated above, however, such architectures are both costly and complex.
Referring now to
Input FIFOs 22A-F are read sixteen bits at a time, and video data signal 32 is input to encoders 26A-F for compression. The reading of input FIFOs 22A-F can be driven by either splitter card 16 or by pixel CPLDs 24A-F (i.e., shown interposed between encoders 26A-F and input FIFOs 22A-F). Another function of pixel CPLDs 24A-F would be to extract the video synch from video data signal 32 and supply the synch to encoders 26A-F.
As shown in
Referring now to
As depicted, MPEG-2 encoders 56A-F are connected in parallel and are directly (e.g., gluelessly) attached to HDTV video source 52. Under the present invention, each encoder 56A-F receives HDTV video data signal 64 and pixel clock signal 66 (collectively referred to as Society of Moving Pictures and Television Engineers (SMPTE) 274-M HDTV interface 54) directly from HDTV video source 52. Thus, instead of receiving only a portion of a HDTV image (as in the related art), encoders 56A-F of the present invention will receive an entire HDTV image. As such, each encoder 56A-F will typically receive 30 frames per second of HDTV data (e.g., containing HDTV image(s)) consisting of 1080 or 1088 active video lines (i.e., out of a total of 1125 lines per video frame) having 1920 active luminance and chrominance pixels (i.e., out of a total of 2200) per line.
Although each encoder 56A-F will receive an entire HDTV image, no single encoder can process the entire image, as explained above. Thus, the processing must be divided among encoders 56A-F. Processing system 60 provides this functionality. Specifically, each encoder 56A-F includes a digital video input interface 58 that includes processing system 60, which comprises one or more programmable registers 62. In a typical embodiment, registers 62 are programmed with processing information such as: (1) a quantity of encoders 56A-F in the configuration; (2) a relative position of each encoder with respect to one another within the configuration; (3) whether a HDTV image is to be processed horizontally or vertically; (4) a quantity of pixels or lines that adjacent portions should overlap; and (5) an overall image size in pixels or lines based on the processing orientation. Thus, for the exemplary architecture 50 shown in
Referring now to
In general, image 100 will be divided into six portions 102A-F (i.e., one portion for each encoder 56A-F). The portions are generally equal with the exception of any programmed overlap. Portion 102A will be processed by encoder 56A, while portions 102B-F will be processed by encoders 56B-F, respectively. As further shown in
Overlap helps ensure that motion vector(s) based on “best matched” macro blocks from adjacent portions of HDTV image 100 can be generated (i.e., motion estimation overlap in HDTV image processing). It should be understood that overlap as described herein is optional, and that image processing could be provided with no overlap. In such a case, portions 102A-F would be contiguous. Moreover, it should be appreciated that image 100 is described herein as being processed vertically for exemplary purposes only, and that the same concepts could be applied to the horizontal processing of image 100.
Referring now to
It is understood that the present invention can be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. Specifically, it should be appreciated that encoders 56A-F of the present invention can be programmed via a computer-based system (not shown). A typical combination of hardware and software could be a general purpose (computer) system with a computer program that, when loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein. Alternatively, a specific use computer system, containing specialized hardware for carrying out one or more of the functional tasks of the invention could be utilized. The present invention can also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which—when loaded in a (computer) system—is able to carry out these methods. Computer program, software program, program, or software, in the present context mean any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following: (a) conversion to another language, code or notation; and/or (b) reproduction in a different material form.
The foregoing description of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and obviously, many modifications and variations are possible. Such modifications and variations that may be apparent to a person skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined by the accompanying claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4523220 | Adelsen et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4963965 | Haghiri et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4985767 | Haghiri et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5111292 | Kuriacose et al. | May 1992 | A |
5115309 | Hang | May 1992 | A |
5138447 | Shen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5187575 | Lim | Feb 1993 | A |
5291289 | Hulyalkar et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5325199 | Childs | Jun 1994 | A |
5398315 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5410355 | Kolczynski | Apr 1995 | A |
5428403 | Andrew et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5508746 | Lim | Apr 1996 | A |
5510842 | Phillips et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5583889 | Citta et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5640210 | Knee et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5675424 | Park | Oct 1997 | A |
5856847 | Knee et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5991341 | Shin | Nov 1999 | A |
6100940 | Dieterich | Aug 2000 | A |
6108046 | Wu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122010 | Emelko | Sep 2000 | A |
6184921 | Limberg | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185255 | Twitchell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6222891 | Liu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6275536 | Chen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6356589 | Gebler et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6501861 | Cho et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6621870 | Gordon et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6661846 | Ota | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6731685 | Liu et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6788227 | Hall et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7072393 | Boice et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20020131084 | Andrew et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030210821 | Yogeshwar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030174768 A1 | Sep 2003 | US |