The present invention relates in general to the field of data processing. More specifically it concerns the handling of complex queries which here means that each query involves to search for and to retrieve from a database a multiplicity of items to be associated together to present to the user sets of said items combined together in a logical way.
One non limitative application is the processing of search requests in the field of the travel and tourism industry when a user wishes to book a bundle of services, such as a combination of air travel services with hotel accommodation and/or car rental which are very different components by nature.
Today's search systems are well efficient for processing requests for one type of items. In the travel industry field, search engines are now widely used and return travel solutions are sent in reply to an end user request. This is the case for engines dedicated to the airline industry such as low fare search engines providing the user with a set of low price flight solutions to be displayed on a friendly graphical interface.
The success of these techniques led the industry to propose computerized tools for enlarging the scope of the searches, for returning packages of products. This is particularly the case in the travel industry where the customer often needs a bundle of services when traveling. Products to be packaged can include flight tickets, hotel nights, and tourism activities.
Such a search system is complex and involves multiple hardware/software computer resources.
The invention aims at overcoming at least some of the drawbacks of current techniques for processing complex queries.
One technical problem the invention intends to solve is to optimize the processing of complex queries where multiple items of different natures need to be searched and combined to produce a response to a user request. The invention provides an efficient solution for searches based on heterogeneous data and triggered by complex queries.
In a more specific manner, the present invention relates to a method for processing a data search based on a complex query for at least one set of combined elements matching search parameters, at least two of the combined elements being of different element types. Said method preferably comprises the query processing steps of:
The at least one set of claims combined elements is/are preferably the best set(s) with regard to evaluation parameters such as, but not systematically, the price of the set. In the later case, the best set(s) is (are) the cheapest one(s).
Thanks to the invention, searches can be performed on the basis of very heterogeneous data sources. Heterogeneous data structures here means that at least two of the element types are defined by data of different data structures. The presentation of the data and/or the data fields describing the elements of said element types are thus different from one source of data to at least another and this means that no single search engine is normally capable of searching among these heterogeneous sources. Whereas current systems cope with this problem by multiplying the search engines (one for each source) and by implementing post-processing means to aggregate the results obtained from the plurality of engines, the invention dramatically saves computer resources since one engine is sufficient. In addition the engine directly produces element associations without requiring a post step of aggregation. And the results returned by the engine are much more reliable. This is because the engine directly works with elements described by definition data of the same data structure so that the search and the combination of the elements are integrated within the same process.
Further optional features which may be used cumulatively or alternatively are introduced hereafter:
the complex query includes data defining a plurality of components derived from the search parameters and for which at least one element is to be searched for.
The present invention further relates to a system for processing a data search based on a complex query comprising means for executing the method of the invention.
According to a preferred embodiment, the search engine is a low fare search engine.
This system may comprise computer software stored in a non-transitory computer-readable memory medium that is executed by at least one data processor that comprises part of the system.
The present invention also relates to a computer program product storing a computer program comprising instructions adapted to perform the method of the invention.
The present invention will now be described in details with reference to the drawings for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiment.
The invention can be implemented with computer hardware and software means. It can include a server side where the processing of data takes place. This server side—which may be comprised of single or plural computer devices—preferably communicates via network resources with at least one remote user device such as but not exclusively a desktop computer, a smart phone or the like. Communication networks used for the data transmission may include local area networks and/or wide area networks such as the internet.
A few definitions are given hereafter:
The detailed description of a preferred embodiment is given hereafter in the case of travel products.
We hereby show how a typical travel product is structured in the air industry field. The airlines industry adopts a quite complex definition of the travel products to be ticketed. This definition is organized around a fare definition concept which not only gives price amount information about a travel product but also details about the application of the fare, availability indication on top on more general data (origin and destination, cabin class and service level . . . ).
One aspect of these data is the application rules an example of which is provided hereafter: within each rule, there are categories that are designed by a number. A category describes the conditions in a given area. For example, we have: 1→Eligibility . . . 19→Children discount . . . Etc. Inside a category, there are items called Records 2 hereafter also simply called records. Each of them is composed of a set of elements called matching elements (loc 1, loc2, effective and discontinued dates . . . ) that define which record 2 is applicable for a given trip. A record 2 contains a string of records 3. Each record 3 defines a given set of restrictions for the category.
Here is an example:
This shows the complexity of definition of the elements when they are made of air travel products defined with fares. In addition the data structure and thus the element types may be different from one airline carrier or travel provider to another. And other travel elements (such as railways tickets, car rental or hotel rooms) have different definition data structures so that one technical problem is to work with the various data structures within the same process of response to a query.
For example, Air travel elements may be of an element type defined by:
Hotel room elements of D2 source may be of an element type defined by:
And car rental elements of D3 may be of an element type defined by:
All these elements correspond to heterogeneous items which do not share a generic data structure. Typically the data structure of each element type is specified by the administrator of the provider of the considered element.
According to the invention, a conversion of the definition data of the elements is performed. A converter as depicted in
According to a preferred embodiment, the generic data structure comprises:
Application rules may be divided in two categories:
The external rules are used to check the validity of association between various elements. They are hereafter called combinatory rules. In one embodiment the combinatory rules are stored in the same memory area as the other application rules. In an alternative embodiment, they are stored at a different level. They can be administered by a person differing from the provider of the elements. For example, combinatory rules may be defined by the administrator of a web based entity such as an online travel agency.
If a combinatory rule is not filed in the generic format, the converter will adapt it the same way it adapts the rest of the element definition data.
For combinatory rules, the generic data format can be similar to the category 10 of rules as defined by IATA (International Air Transport Association) for combinability of air fares.
Here is a further exemplified case of combinatory rules for a car rental element having a promotional fare:
The results of the conversion step performed by the converter may be stored in an appropriate repository such as the c d database depicted in
Turning now to
The end user—such as a potential traveler—enters search parameters by means of a computer device. Preferably this step uses a graphical user interface displayed via a browser. Not all the search parameters useful for processing the request need to be entered by the user. Some parameters may be determined by the system based, for example, on default values or on values deduced from the environment of the user request (e.g. an origin location may be defined as the user device location determined by a satellite positioning system or an IP address).
In one embodiment, the end user connects to an airline or other provider-website and can use a product selection button to chose components he wishes to book. Once a product is selected, the graphical user interface requests the user enters more details on the corresponding component. By way of example, if the component is an air product, it leads the interface to request the departure and arrival cities as well as the dates or time windows. Then the user is offered to add another component. Similarly, each new component involves the input of particulars for this part of the request.
For illustration purpose, consider a request form an origin to New-York city with accommodation, then the input of the request would involve three components: air (outbound), hotel, air (inbound), corresponding to two element types.
Preferably the request is transmitted over a communication network to a server sideNext, the definition of the relevant element types and the search parameters are used to define a query to be processed by a search engine to search for matching elements. The engine may be a conventional search engine such as a fare shopping engine used in transactional environments to return priced products. More precisely the engine may be a low fare search engine aimed at returning low price solutions. Thanks to the invention only one engine—and of a conventional kind—is sufficient to process the query which is however complex since it involves plural element types.
To search for matching elements, the engine accesses converted definition data obtained according to the previously described conversion method.
The processing of the queries is preferably driven by the element fares of the elements. As previously indicated, each element is defined by general data (identification of the element; general definition data . . . ) and by at least one (but often plural) element fares. The association is here based on the element fares. Upon receipt of a query, candidate elements are searched for each component of the query. For the found elements, the system starts an association mechanism in which element fares of the found elements are associated. The system discards associations that failed (when their rules are not compatible) and generates successful element fares associations. The later associations are then used to build sets of combined elements to which a fare is assigned deriving from the association of the element fares. Such sets of combined elements are thus called fared sets of combined elements.
It should be noted that one element can be the source of series of element fares associations. For example, one element having one element fare A and one element fare B lead to associations based on A and or B.
In one embodiment, the best elements found for each component are combined.
However other association policies may be pursued.
Associations of elements must comply with the combinatory rules. In a preferred embodiment, this check is done dynamically with the association process: starting from one matching element fare (corresponding to an element included in a set of elements matching one component of the request), a second matching element fare (corresponding to an element included in a set of elements matching another component of the request) is considered. Their combinability is checked by accessing the combinatory rules. This check is depicted on
If the association is invalidated, it is withdrawn from consideration by the engine which continues its search.
If the association is validated, the engine then tries to combine the association with another matching element fare of an element corresponding to still another component of the request. Again combinatory rules are checked and the process continues until a complete association of matching elements fitting the whole request has be determined and checked against the combinatory rules.
Returning to
Another flow is illustrated in
According to this embodiment, associations of elements are built during a construction stage. They are stored for future use. This corresponds to a pre-process in which massive queries are generated at the server side without direct link to an actual user request.
The queries are processed by an engine which can be the same as the engine described in reference to
The stored associations are accessed by the second search engine upon receipt of a user request. Matching associations are then confronted to the combinatory rules and non-complying associations are invalidated. Validated associations are returned to the user. From a user point of view, the response time is decreased thanks to this embodiment. A drawback is that all calculated associations may be invalidated by this post-filtering.
A variation of the embodiment of
Although illustrative embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments and that changes and modifications may be effected therein by those in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11305300 | Mar 2011 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6442526 | Vance et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6839714 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7644361 | Wu et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7693900 | Wilmering et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716233 | Xiong | May 2010 | B2 |
7783506 | Vaughan et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7856462 | Huang et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7979457 | Garman | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8041728 | Dettinger et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8078647 | Liang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8200549 | Crean et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8249885 | Berkowitz et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20030055690 | Garback | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20070260495 | Mace et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080281802 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090150343 | English et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090265392 | Taneike et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100299336 | Bergstraesser et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120136683 | Wallace et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 840 806 | Mar 2006 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120239636 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |