This invention relates generally to the financial API field, and more specifically to a new and useful system and method for programmatically accessing financial data in the financial API field.
Banks and other financial institutions hold considerable information relating to a user's current financial status and financial history. Such data is often presented through a bank's website or sometimes applications (e.g., mobile applications). However, such tools only provide information about the single institution, and do not combine multiple institutions. Furthermore, such institutions commonly do not expose a public version of an API, providing a large barrier to other parties to solve such a problem. Some online products offer capabilities to merge information from different institutions. One such commonly used approach is to simulate user access of a bank website to access information. There are numerous problems with such solutions. Web-crawling solutions such as these are slow to the end user because full pages have to be rendered and sometimes depend on executing javascript and other user interface simulations. Related to this, such methods are more costly to the financial institutions because numerous web resources are consumed for a given piece of information. Additionally, such a web-crawling approach is highly dependent on the visual representation of the information. A change in the layout or visual representation can break such web crawling. Thus, there is a need in the financial API field to create a new and useful system and method for programmatically accessing financial data. This invention provides such improved/new and useful system and method.
The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
As shown in
The API service 110, which functions to provide a normalized customer/user facing interface. The API interface is preferably normalized in the sense that the underlying API to the external institution (e.g., 141-143) that acts as the source of the information is abstracted away, and the interface to different institution information is substantially similar. In some variations, various aspects of the API 110 may be limited when interfacing with particular institutions. For example, one institution may not support a feature such as digital check deposit, while a second institution does. In this case, the API 110 may define the API such that the API feature for check deposit is prevented for the first institution. The system 100 and more specifically the API service 110 is preferably used to provide an accessible API service to outside developers. As such, the system 100 is preferably a multi-tenant system that allows numerous accounts to share use of the system 100. The system 100 and more particularly the API 110 may alternatively be a single tenant system. For example, the system may be used as an internal system to a website providing an online financial management product.
The API service 110 is preferably a RESTful API but may alternatively be any suitable API such as SOAP or custom protocol. The RESTful API works according to an HTTP request and response model. HTTP requests (or any suitable request communication) to the system 100 preferably observe the principles of a RESTful design. RESTful is understood in this document to describe a Representational State Transfer architecture as is known in the art. The RESTful HTTP requests are preferably stateless, thus each message communicated contains all necessary information for processing the request and generating a response. The API service 110 can include various resources which act as endpoints which act as a mechanism for specifying requested information or requesting particular actions. The resources can be expressed as URI's or resource paths. The RESTful API resources can additionally be responsive to different types of HTTP methods such as GET, PUT, POST and/or DELETE.
The API service 110 can provide an interface into a variety of information and action resources. Information relating to an account is preferably accessible through querying particular API resources. For example, a list of transactions and information about each individual transaction may be accessible through different API calls. Information can additionally relate to account summary information, account details such as address and contact information, information about other parties such as the entities involved in a transaction, and/or any suitable information. The API may additionally be used to trigger or facilitate performing some action. For example, an API call may be used in transferring money, updating account information, setting up alerts, or performing any suitable action. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that such exemplary API features that any suitable API feature possibilities and semantic architecture may be used.
In one exemplary implementation, an API call can support adding a user, completing authentication, accessing transaction information, and other actions. For example, an application may POST to a “/connect” REST API resource to authenticate a user; if the institution includes multi-factor authentication, then a “/connect/step” resource can be submitted to complete multi-factor authentication credentials; and then performing a GET on the “/connect” resource can access transactional data. The API may additionally include informational resources to access information about entities involved in transactions. For example, the API 110 may allow a particular business resource to be accessed to obtain contextual information about the business such as name, location, and classification.
The application proxy system 120 functions to manage the simulation of application access to an institution. The application proxy system 120 operates in cooperation with an institution interface module (e.g., one of the modules 131-133 of
An institution interface module (e.g., one of the modules 131-133 of
As shown in
Block S110, which includes creating an application proxy instance (e.g., an application proxy instance 121-123 of
Creating a proxy instance preferably includes negotiating registration of the proxy instance with the institution, which functions to establish the proxy instance with the selected external institution. An institution interface module (e.g., one of the modules 131-133 of
As mentioned above, multifactor authentication (MFA) may be part of negotiating with an external institution. Frequently, an external institution will respond with indication of a MFA credential requirement. Such MFA requirements are preferably fulfilled by relaying the MFA challenge/task up to a user. In one implementation, the system 100 will receive a message indicating that a security question should be asked to complete the negotiation. The security question is passed back to the associated application, e.g., the applications 151 and 152 of
Block S120, receiving a normalized account request, functions to receive an API request in the format of the system 100. As mentioned above, the syntax and mode of communicating an API request is normalized such that the form is independent of the institution (e.g., one of the institutions 141-143 of
Block S130, which includes negotiating communication with an external interface (e.g., one of APIs 161-163) through a proxy instance (e.g., one of the proxy instances 121-123) functions to execute and manage communication between the system 100 and an external institution system (e.g., a 141-143) when fulfilling an account request. The proxy instance (e.g., one of the proxy instances 121-123) preferably provides a mechanism through which access will be granted. The communication is preferably executed while an authenticated session is active. Communication sessions may be expired by the system 100 or the external institution (e.g., a 141-143) for various reasons such as remaining inactive for a set amount of time. A communication session may be active subsequent to enrolling a proxy instance or may require setting up a session through the proxy instance as described below.
Negotiating communication preferably includes creating requests that conform to expected messages of the external institution (e.g., a 141-143). This can include setting headers, body contents, and other message properties. An institution is preferably expecting particular headers. For example, the headers may include a host or path, a data, content type, cookies, MAC address, a user identifier, auth properties, or other suitable headers. Creating requests can additionally include transforming request properties into expected form, which may primarily include applying a set encryption pattern to a request. In one variation, transforming the request involves encrypting content according to a public key, wherein the public key may be stored as part of the proxy instance. The institutions may take varying approaches to how information is communicated. In an alternative institution, the contents of a message may be unencrypted; in which case, the contents are submitted in a plaintext, unencrypted form. In addition to creating requests that conform to expected messages of the external institution, the method can include following a request-response pattern. That pattern can involve a single request and response, but may alternatively include a sequence of different request and responses to obtain desired information.
In some variations, information or actions may not be available through the first proxy instance and so the method may include automatically switching to a second proxy instance with supported functionality. For example, full bank statements may not be available in a mobile application, and the institution API (e.g., one of 161-163 of
Block S140, which includes returning results, functions to deliver the results as a response to the request. Returning the results preferably includes transforming the data obtained from the external institution into a normalized form. The information is preferably formatted into a standardized format that is substantially similar in representation between different institutions served by the system 100. Transforming the data can additionally include processing, supplementing, and/or otherwise enhancing information. Some information provided by an institution may be poorly formed. For example, store information for a particular transaction may be poorly labeled and may be represented different from other institutions. Such contextual information about external entities can preferably cleaned and supplemented with additional information. For example, an entity may be supplemented with categorical labels, tags, geo location information, and/or other suitable information. The returned results can be represented data format such as JSON, XML, or any suitable format.
The method can additionally include setting up a session through the proxy instance S150, functions to facilitate accessing information after negotiating a proxy instance for an account and institution. The proxy instance (e.g., 121-123 of
The method can additionally include re-capturing updated credentials, which functions to update user credentials for an institution. Updated credentials are preferably updated when a user changes them within the institution or when the proxy instance is otherwise locked out of the account. An error will preferably occur indicating that a communication session was not successful, and then an API request can be submitted to update a proxy instance with new credentials.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In some implementations, each application proxy instance (e.g., proxy instances 521-525), specifies the developer account, the user account of the developer account, the associated financial service system (e.g., “Institution”), and credentials of the user account for the financial service system, as shown in
As shown in
In the example embodiment of
4.1 Creating an Application Proxy Instance
Process S710, which includes creating an application proxy instance that simulates an application of an external financial service system, functions to control the application proxy instance management module 541 of
In some implementations, the application proxy instance management module 541 creates the application proxy instance responsive to a request to create an application proxy instance. In some implementations, the request to create an application proxy instance specifies information identifying an external financial service system, and a user account of an external application system (e.g., a user account of an external application system of the application 452 of
In some implementations, the application proxy instance management module 541 stores the created application proxy instance in association with a user account (e.g., “User A” 511 of
In some implementations, creating the application proxy instance includes controlling the application proxy instance management module 541 to construct the application proxy instance to simulate communication of an application (e.g., application 453 of
In some implementations, creating the application proxy instance includes controlling the application proxy instance management module 541 to register the created application proxy instance with the external financial service system.
In some implementations, creating the application proxy instance includes controlling the application proxy instance management module 541 to negotiate registration of the application proxy instance with the financial service system (e.g., institution) as described above for the process S110 of
In some implementations, the request to create an application proxy instance is provided by an external application system (e.g., an external application system of the application 452 of
4.2 Accessing Financial Data
Process S720, which includes receiving a normalized API account request for financial data, functions to control the financial platform system 400 to receive the normalized API account request by using the normalized API 410 of the financial platform system 400. In the example embodiment, the application proxy system 420 includes application proxy instances for each financial service system corresponding to the normalized API account request for financial data. Each application proxy instance is an application proxy instance that is created as described above for the process S710.
In an implementation, receiving a normalized API account request for financial data includes determining whether the application proxy system 420 includes application proxy instances for each financial service system corresponding to the normalized API account request for financial data, and responsive to a determination that the application proxy system 420 does not include an application proxy instance for a financial service system of the normalized API account request for financial data, the financial platform system 400 provides a normalized API account response to the application system that has provided the normalized API account request for financial data. The normalized API account response prompts the application system (e.g., the system of the application 452) to provide a normalized API create request to create an application proxy instance for a financial service system identified in the normalized API account response. In some implementations, the application system provides the normalized API create request to create the application proxy instance as described above for the process S710.
In some implementations, the normalized API account request is a request in accordance with the normalized financial data API (e.g., 410) of the financial platform system 400, and the normalized financial data API is constructed to provide a normalized interface for accessing financial data from external financial service systems (e.g., 441-443) having different proprietary APIs (e.g., 461-463).
4.2.1 Request Parameters
In some implementations, the normalized API account request for financial data specifies a user account (e.g., “User A”, “User B”) of an external application system (e.g., a user account of an external application system of the application 452 of
4.2.2 Request for Financial Data of all Accounts
In some implementations, the normalized API account request for financial data is a request for financial data of financial accounts of all financial service systems corresponding to application proxy instances for a user account (e.g., “User A”, “User B” of
4.2.2 Request for Financial Data of Specified Financial Service System
In some implementations, the normalized API account request for financial data is a request for financial data of financial accounts of a financial service system (e.g., “Bank 1”, “Bank 2” of
4.2.4 Request for Financial Data of Specified Account
In some implementations, the normalized API account request for financial data is a request for financial data of an account of a financial service system, and information identifying the account (e.g., an account number) and the financial service system (e.g., “Bank 1”, “Bank 2” of
4.2.5 Request for Details of Specified Account Transaction
In some implementations, the normalized API account request for financial data is a request for detailed financial data of an account transaction of an account of a financial service system, and information identifying the transaction (e.g., a credit card purchase, a transfer, a check entry, and the like), the account and the financial service system is specified in the request.
4.2 Negotiating Communication
Process S730, which includes negotiating communication with each external financial service system, functions to control the application proxy system 420 to use a respective application proxy instance to access the requested financial data from an external financial service system by using a proprietary API.
In some implementations, in the case of a normalized API account request for financial data of financial accounts of all financial service systems corresponding to application proxy instances for a user account (e.g., “User A”, “User B”) specified in the request, the application proxy system 420 uses application proxy instances stored by the application proxy system 420 in association with the specified user account (e.g., “User A”, “User B”, as shown in
In some implementations, in the case of a normalized API account request for financial data of financial accounts of a financial service system specified in the request, the application proxy system 420 uses application proxy instances stored by the application proxy system 420 in association with the specified user account (e.g., “User A”) and the specified financial service system (e.g., “Bank 1”).
In some implementations, in the case of a normalized API account request for financial data of an account of a financial service system, the application proxy system 420 uses application proxy instances stored by the application proxy system 420 in association with the specified user account and the specified financial service system.
In some implementations, in the case of a normalized API account request for detailed financial data of an account transaction of an account of a financial service system, the application proxy system 420 uses application proxy instances stored by the application proxy system 420 in association with the specified user account and the specified financial service system.
In some implementations, negotiating communication with a financial service system includes forming a proprietary API request in accordance with the proprietary API (e.g., 461-463 of
As described above, the financial platform system 400 includes an institution interface module (e.g., an institution interface module 431-433 of
In some implementations, the financial platform system 400 generates each institution interface module (e.g., 432) by at least one of: parsing source code of the application (e.g., the application 453 of
4.4 Providing Financial Data to the Application System
Process S730, which includes providing financial data to the external financial application system as a response to the normalized API account request, functions to control the application proxy system 420 to provide the financial data received by negotiating communication with each external financial service system associated with the normalized API account request.
In some implementations, providing the financial data includes transforming the received financial data into a normalized form. In some implementations, providing the financial data includes transforming the received financial data based on parameters of the normalized API account request. In some implementations, transforming the received financial data includes at least one of processing the financial data, cleaning the financial data, supplementing the financial data with additional information, and enhancing the financial data. In some implementations, additional information includes at least one of categorical labels, tags, and geo location information.
In some embodiments, the method 700 includes: setting up a session through at least one application proxy instance (e.g., one of the proxy instances 521-525 of
In some implementations, the process S710 is similar to the process S110 of
As shown in
In some implementations, each application proxy instance is an application proxy instance that is created as described above for the process S710 of the method 700.
In some implementations, proprietary API requests of a proprietary API (e.g., 461-463 of
In some implementations, normalized API requests of the normalized API 410 of the financial platform system include at least one of: a request for a list of transactions for a user account of an external application system (e.g., a user account of an external application system of the application 452 of
In some implementations, a primary application proxy instance and at least one secondary application proxy instance are associated with a financial service system corresponding to the normalized API financial service request, and responsive to a determination that the normalized API financial service request cannot be processed by using the primary application proxy instance, the financial platform system 400 uses the secondary application proxy instance to process the normalized API financial service request. In some implementations, the primary proxy instance corresponds to a mobile application of a respective financial service system, and the secondary proxy instance corresponds to at least one of a web-based application and a desktop application of the respective financial service system.
In some implementations, providing a normalized API financial service response to the external application system based on at least one proprietary API response received from an external financial service system (the process S820) includes transforming financial data of the proprietary API response into a normalized form. In some implementations, transforming the received financial data includes at least one of processing the financial data, cleaning the financial data, supplementing the financial data with additional information, and enhancing the financial data, and additional information includes at least one of categorical labels, tags, and geo location information. In some implementations, the received financial data is transformed as described above for S140 of
In the example embodiment of
5.1 Normalized API Financial Service Requests
In some implementations, the normalized API financial service request is provided by an external application system in a manner similar to the process of providing a normalized API account request described above for process S720 of
5.1.1 Financial Data Requests
In some implementations, the normalized API financial service request is a normalized API account request for financial data, as described above for the method 700 of
5.1.2 Financial Transfer Between Accounts of a Financial Service System
In some implementations, the normalized API financial service request is a financial transfer request to transfer funds between accounts of a financial service system, and the accounts are associated with user credentials of the user account (e.g., “User A”, “User B” of
In some implementations, the financial transfer request to transfer funds between accounts of a financial service system specifies the user account (e.g., “User A”, “User B” of
The application proxy system 420 uses an application proxy instance stored in association with the specified user account and the specified financial service system to perform the transfer. The application proxy system 420 uses the application proxy instance to perform the transfer by using an institution interface module (e.g., 431-433) of the specified financial service system to provide the financial service system with a proprietary API transfer request in accordance with the proprietary API (e.g., 461-463) of the financial service system.
5.1.3 Financial Transfer Between Accounts of a Same User and Different Financial Service Systems
In some implementations, the normalized API financial service request is a financial transfer request to transfer funds from a source account of a source financial service system to a destination account of a destination financial service system, and the source and destination accounts are associated with respective user credentials of the user account (e.g., “User A”, “User B”) of the external application system. For example, a user associated with the user account can request a transfer between accounts of the user at different financial service systems by using a financial application (e.g., 452) that uses the financial platform system 400.
In some implementations, the financial transfer request to transfer funds from a source account of a source financial service system to a destination account of a destination financial service system specifies the user account (e.g., “User A”, “User B”) of the application system, the source financial service system, information identifying the source account, the destination financial serviced system, information identifying the destination account, and an amount of funds to be transferred. In some implementations, the financial transfer request specifies parameters. In some implementations, the financial transfer request specifies an account (e.g., a developer account) (e.g., “Dev Account A”, “Dev Account B”) of the financial platform system 400 associated with the external application system (e.g., an external application system of the application 452 of
The application proxy system 420 uses at least one of an application proxy instance stored in association with the specified user account and the specified source financial service system and an application proxy instance stored in association with the specified user account and the specified destination financial service system to perform the transfer.
In some implementations, the application proxy system 420 selects one of the application proxy instance of the specified source financial service system and the application proxy instance of the specified destination financial service system, and uses the selected application proxy instance to perform the transfer by using an institution interface module (e.g., 431-433) of the associated financial service system to provide the financial service system with a proprietary API transfer request in accordance with the proprietary API (e.g., 461-463) of the financial service system.
In some implementations, the application proxy system 420 selects one of the application proxy instance of the specified source financial service system and the application proxy instance of the specified destination financial service system based on capabilities of the respective financial service systems.
In some implementations, the application proxy system 420 selects one of the application proxy instance of the specified source financial service system and the application proxy instance of the specified destination financial service system based on properties of the application proxy instances.
In some implementations, the application proxy system 420 selects one of the application proxy instance of the specified source financial service system and the application proxy instance of the specified destination financial service system based on transaction fees of the corresponding financial service systems.
5.1.4 Financial Transfer Between Accounts of Different Users
In some implementations, the normalized financial service request is a financial transfer request to transfer funds from a source account of a source financial service system to a destination account of a destination financial service system, the source account is associated with user credentials of the user account (e.g., “User A” of
In some implementations, the normalized API financial transfer request specifies the user account (e.g., “User A” of
The application proxy system 420 uses an application proxy instance stored in association with the specified user account and the specified source financial service system to perform the transfer. The application proxy system 420 uses the application proxy instance to perform the transfer by using an institution interface module (e.g., 431-433) of the specified source financial service system to provide the source financial service system with a proprietary API transfer request in accordance with the proprietary API (e.g., 461-463) of the source financial service system.
In some implementations, the normalized API financial service request is a financial transfer request to transfer funds from a source account of a source financial service system to a destination account of a destination financial service system, the destination account is associated with user credentials of the user account of the external application system, and user credentials of the source account are not associated with the user account of the external application system. For example, a user associated with the user account (e.g., “User A” of
In some implementations, the normalized API financial transfer request specifies the user account of the application system, the destination financial service system, information identifying the destination account, information identifying the source account, and an amount of funds to be transferred. In some implementations, the normalized API financial transfer request specifies parameters. In some implementations, the normalized API financial transfer request specifies an account (e.g., a developer account) of the financial platform system 400 associated with the external application system (e.g., an external application system of the application 452 of
The application proxy system 420 uses an application proxy instance stored in association with the specified user account and the specified destination financial service system to perform the transfer. The application proxy system 420 uses the application proxy instance to perform the transfer by using an institution interface module (e.g., 431-433) of the destination source financial service system to provide the destination financial service system with a proprietary API transfer request in accordance with the proprietary API (e.g., 461-463) of the destination financial service system.
5.1.5 Scheduled Payments
In some implementations, the normalized API financial service request is a request to schedule payment from a source account of a source financial service system to a destination account of a destination financial service system, the source account is associated with user credentials of the user account of the external application system. For example, a user associated with the user account can schedule payment (to a destination account of a different user) from the source financial service system.
In some implementations, the normalized API schedule payment request specifies the user account of the application system, the source financial service system, information identifying the source account, information identifying the destination account, and an amount of funds to be transferred. In some implementations, the normalized API schedule payment request specifies parameters. In some implementations, the normalized API schedule payment request specifies an account (e.g., a developer account) of the financial platform system 400 associated with the external application system (e.g., an external application system of the application 452 of
The application proxy system 420 uses an application proxy instance stored in association with the specified user account and the specified source financial service system to schedule the payment. The application proxy system 420 uses the application proxy instance to schedule the payment by using an institution interface module (e.g., 431-433) of the specified source financial service system to provide the source financial service system with a proprietary API schedule payment request in accordance with the proprietary API (e.g., 461-463) of the source financial service system.
5.1.6 Electronic Check Deposit
In some implementations, the normalized API financial service request is a request for electronic deposit of a check in a destination account of a destination financial service system, and the destination account is associated with user credentials of the user account of the external application system. For example, a user associated with the user account can electronically deposit a check (to a destination account of the user) by capturing a digital image of the check.
In some implementations, the normalized API electronic deposit request specifies the user account of the application system, the destination financial service system, information identifying the destination account, and a digital image of the check. In some implementations, the normalized API electronic deposit request specifies an amount of funds indicated by the digital image of the check. In some implementations, the normalized API electronic deposit request specifies parameters. In some implementations, the normalized API electronic deposit request specifies an account (e.g., a developer account) of the financial platform system 400 associated with the external application system (e.g., an external application system of the application 452 of
The application proxy system 420 uses an application proxy instance stored in association with the specified user account and the specified destination financial service system to perform the electronic deposit. The application proxy system 420 uses the application proxy instance to perform the electronic deposit by using an institution interface module (e.g., 431-433) of the destination financial service system to provide the destination financial service system with a proprietary API electronic deposit request in accordance with the proprietary API (e.g., 461-463) of the destination financial service system.
5.1.7 Update Account Information
In some implementations, the normalized API financial service request is a request to update account information of a specified financial service system.
In some implementations, the normalized API update account information request specifies the user account of the application system, the financial service system, and account update information. In some implementations, the normalized API update account information request specifies information indicating an account of the specified financial service system. In some implementations, the normalized API update account information request specifies parameters. In some implementations, the normalized API update account information request specifies an account (e.g., a developer account) of the financial platform system 400 associated with the external application system (e.g., an external application system of the application 452 of
In some implementations, the normalized API request to update account information includes a request to update contact information, and the account update information includes updated contact information.
In some implementations, the normalized API request to update account information includes a request to change a password, and the account update information includes a new password.
In some implementations, the normalized API request to update account information includes a request to update account alert settings, and the account update information includes updated account alert settings.
The application proxy system 420 uses an application proxy instance stored in association with the specified user account and the specified financial service system to perform the account information update. The application proxy system 420 uses the application proxy instance to perform the account information update by using an institution interface module (e.g., 431-433) of the financial service system to provide the financial service system with a proprietary API update account information request in accordance with the proprietary API (e.g., 461-463) of the financial service system. In some embodiments, the proprietary API update account information request in accordance with the proprietary API includes at least one of an update contact information request, a change password request, and an update account alert settings request.
5.1.8 Request for Services
In some implementations, the normalized API financial service request is a request for services of a specified financial service system.
In some implementations, the normalized API services request specifies the user account of the application system, the financial service system, and service request information. In some implementations, the normalized API services request specifies parameters. In some implementations, the normalized API services request specifies an account (e.g., a developer account) of the financial platform system 400 associated with the external application system (e.g., an external application system of the application 452 of
In some implementations, the normalized API services request includes a request for at least one of a new bank card and a request for new checks.
In some implementations, the normalized API services request includes a request to report fraud, and the service request information includes fraud report information.
The application proxy system 420 uses an application proxy instance stored in association with the specified user account and the specified financial service system to perform the service request. The application proxy system 420 uses the application proxy instance to perform the service request by using an institution interface module (e.g., 431-433) of the financial service system to provide the financial service system with a proprietary API service request in accordance with the proprietary API (e.g., 461-463) of the financial service system. In some embodiments, the proprietary API service request in accordance with the proprietary API includes at least one of a new bank card request, check request, and a fraud report request.
The bus 901 interfaces with the processors 901A-901N, the main memory (e.g., a random access memory (RAM)) 922, a read only memory (ROM) 904, a processor-readable storage medium 905, a display device 907, a user input device 908, and a network device 911.
The processors 901A-901N may take many forms, such as ARM processors, X86 processors, and the like.
In some implementations, the system (e.g., 400) includes at least one of a central processing unit (processor) and a multi-processor unit (MPU).
The processors 901A-901N and the main memory 922 form a processing unit 999. In some embodiments, the processing unit includes one or more processors communicatively coupled to one or more of a RAM, ROM, and machine-readable storage medium; the one or more processors of the processing unit receive instructions stored by the one or more of a RAM, ROM, and machine-readable storage medium via a bus; and the one or more processors execute the received instructions. In some embodiments, the processing unit is an ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit). In some embodiments, the processing unit is a SoC (System-on-Chip). In some embodiments, the processing unit includes one or more of an API Service, an Application Proxy System, and one or more Instance Interface Modules.
The network adapter device 911 provides one or more wired or wireless interfaces for exchanging data and commands between the system (e.g., 400) and other devices, such as financial service systems (e.g., 441-443), user devices (e.g., 471-472). Such wired and wireless interfaces include, for example, a universal serial bus (USB) interface, Bluetooth interface, Wi-Fi interface, Ethernet interface, near field communication (NFC) interface, and the like.
Machine-executable instructions in software programs (such as an operating system, application programs, and device drivers) are loaded into the memory 922 (of the processing unit 999) from the processor-readable storage medium 905, the ROM 904 or any other storage location. During execution of these software programs, the respective machine-executable instructions are accessed by at least one of processors 901A-901N (of the processing unit 999) via the bus 901, and then executed by at least one of processors 901A-901N. Data used by the software programs are also stored in the memory 922, and such data is accessed by at least one of processors 901A-901N during execution of the machine-executable instructions of the software programs. The processor-readable storage medium 905 is one of (or a combination of two or more of) a hard drive, a flash drive, a DVD, a CD, an optical disk, a floppy disk, a flash storage, a solid state drive, a ROM, an EEPROM, an electronic circuit, a semiconductor memory device, and the like. The processor-readable storage medium 905 includes an operating system 912, software programs 913, device drivers 914, the API Service 410, the Application Proxy System 420, and the Institution Interface Modules 431-433.
The system and method of the preferred embodiment and variations thereof can be embodied and/or implemented at least in part as a machine configured to receive a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions are preferably executed by computer-executable components preferably integrated with the financial data API system. The computer-readable medium can be stored on any suitable computer-readable media such as RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices (CD or DVD), hard drives, floppy drives, or any suitable device. The computer-executable component is preferably a general or application specific processor, but any suitable dedicated hardware or hardware/firmware combination device can alternatively or additionally execute the instructions.
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/790,840, filed 2 Jul. 2015, which is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/719,110, filed 21 May 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/001,452, filed on 21 May 2014, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5237499 | Garback | Aug 1993 | A |
5347632 | Filepp | Sep 1994 | A |
5634127 | Cloud | May 1997 | A |
5649186 | Ferguson | Jul 1997 | A |
5701451 | Rogers | Dec 1997 | A |
5710884 | Dedrick | Jan 1998 | A |
5710918 | Lagarde | Jan 1998 | A |
5721908 | Lagarde | Feb 1998 | A |
5727159 | Kikinis | Mar 1998 | A |
5745754 | Lagarde | Apr 1998 | A |
5752246 | Rogers | May 1998 | A |
5778065 | Hauser et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778367 | Wesinger, Jr. et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787403 | Randle | Jul 1998 | A |
5793964 | Rogers | Aug 1998 | A |
5813007 | Nielsen | Sep 1998 | A |
5815665 | Teper | Sep 1998 | A |
5819284 | Farber | Oct 1998 | A |
5835724 | Smith | Nov 1998 | A |
5838910 | Domenikos et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838916 | Domenikos et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845073 | Carlin | Dec 1998 | A |
5855018 | Chor et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862325 | Shattuck | Jan 1999 | A |
5870559 | Leshem et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875296 | Shi | Feb 1999 | A |
5878219 | Vance | Mar 1999 | A |
5892905 | Brandt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892909 | Grasso | Apr 1999 | A |
5898836 | Freivald | Apr 1999 | A |
5901287 | Bull | May 1999 | A |
5903881 | Schrader | May 1999 | A |
5908469 | Botz | Jun 1999 | A |
5913214 | Madnick | Jun 1999 | A |
5918216 | Miksovsky et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920848 | Schutzer | Jul 1999 | A |
5926798 | Carter | Jul 1999 | A |
5930764 | Melchione et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930777 | Barber | Jul 1999 | A |
5933604 | Inakoshi | Aug 1999 | A |
5933816 | Zeanah | Aug 1999 | A |
5956720 | Fernandez et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961593 | Gabber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5961601 | Iyengar | Oct 1999 | A |
5963915 | Kirsch | Oct 1999 | A |
5963925 | Kolling | Oct 1999 | A |
5966967 | Agrawal | Oct 1999 | A |
5978828 | Greer | Nov 1999 | A |
5978842 | Noble | Nov 1999 | A |
5983267 | Shklar et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983268 | Freivald | Nov 1999 | A |
5987440 | O'Neil | Nov 1999 | A |
5987454 | Hobbs | Nov 1999 | A |
5995943 | Bull | Nov 1999 | A |
5999971 | Buckland | Dec 1999 | A |
6003032 | Bunney et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006333 | Nielsen | Dec 1999 | A |
6023698 | Lavey | Feb 2000 | A |
6041362 | Mears et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047327 | Tso et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055570 | Nielsen | Apr 2000 | A |
6078929 | Rao | Jun 2000 | A |
6082776 | Feinberg | Jul 2000 | A |
6092196 | Reiche | Jul 2000 | A |
6092197 | Coueignoux | Jul 2000 | A |
6105131 | Carroll | Aug 2000 | A |
6119101 | Peckover | Sep 2000 | A |
6138158 | Boyle | Oct 2000 | A |
6148337 | Estberg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151581 | Kraftson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151601 | Papierniak | Nov 2000 | A |
6182142 | Win | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185567 | Ratnaraj et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195698 | Lillibridge et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199077 | Inala | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205433 | Boesch | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208975 | Bull | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209007 | Kelley et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6243816 | Fang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246999 | Riley et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6278449 | Sugiarto et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278999 | Knapp | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292789 | Schutzer | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297819 | Furst | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301584 | Ranger | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308203 | Itabashi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311275 | Jin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317783 | Freishtat | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6360205 | Iyengar | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366933 | Ball et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401118 | Thomas | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405245 | Burson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412073 | Rangan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424968 | Broster | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430539 | Lazarus | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6484155 | Kiss | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6499042 | Markus | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510451 | Wu | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6567411 | Dahlen | May 2003 | B2 |
6567850 | Freishtat | May 2003 | B1 |
6594766 | Rangan | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6632248 | Isaac et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633910 | Rajan | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631402 | Devine | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6725200 | Rost | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6802042 | Rangan | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6859931 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6957199 | Fisher | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7028049 | Shelton | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7072932 | Stahl | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7092913 | Cannon, Jr. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7200578 | Paltenghe et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7263548 | Daswani | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7275046 | Tritt et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7340411 | Cook | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7424520 | Daswani | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7752535 | Satyavolu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8006291 | Headley et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8010783 | Cahill | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8145914 | Steeves | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8166562 | Holvey et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8266515 | Satyavolu | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8613066 | Brezinski et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8645264 | Allison et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8676611 | McLaughlin et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8739260 | Damm-Goossens | May 2014 | B1 |
9106642 | Bhimanail | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9449346 | Hockey | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9595023 | Hockey et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9699187 | Chen et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9906520 | Fouad et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10003591 | Hockey et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10104059 | Hockey et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20010011274 | Klug et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020002596 | Sugiarto et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020065772 | Saliba et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020095588 | Shigematsu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030023879 | Wray | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028646 | Wray | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030060896 | Hulai | Mar 2003 | A9 |
20030163425 | Cannon, Jr. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030182035 | DiLodovico et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185370 | Rosera | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204460 | Robinson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050027617 | Zucker et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050154913 | Barriga et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050222929 | Steier et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246269 | Smith | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060015358 | Chua | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060190569 | Neil | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060236384 | Lindholm et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070179942 | Heggem | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070255662 | Tumminaro | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070289002 | van der Horst et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080051059 | Fisher | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052192 | Fisher | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052233 | Fisher | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080162361 | Sklovsky | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183628 | Oliver et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080243784 | Stading | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090037308 | Feinstein | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070257 | Csoka | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090222900 | Benaloh et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245521 | Vembu | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271847 | Karjala et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090328177 | Frey et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100027552 | Hill | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100185868 | Grecia | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100235882 | Moore | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110196790 | Milne | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238550 | Reich et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110295731 | Waldron, III et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120209775 | Milne | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120278201 | Milne | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130019297 | Lawson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130125223 | Sorotokin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130247005 | Hirsch et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130282577 | Milne | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130318592 | Grier, Sr. et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140040148 | Ozvat et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140044123 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140150072 | Castro et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140165156 | Fushman et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140180962 | Fiala et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140189808 | Mahaffey et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215551 | Allain et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140245411 | Meng et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140258063 | Chourasia et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140365350 | Shvarts | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150026024 | Calman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150046338 | Laxminarayanan et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150066719 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088707 | Drury et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150161608 | Gilbert | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150254672 | Huesch et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150281225 | Schoen et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150365399 | Biswas et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160063657 | Chen et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170068954 | Hockey et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170070500 | Hockey et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170200234 | Morse | Jul 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 848 336 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0 848 338 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0 848 339 | Jun 1998 | EP |
2 747 374 | Jun 2014 | EP |
WO 9638795 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9710542 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9709682 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9726612 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9737314 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9814896 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 0025227 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 2017044479 | Mar 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
O'Riain, Seán, Edward Curry, and Andreas Harth. “XBRL and open data for global financial ecosystems: A linked data approach.” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 13.2 (2012): 141-162. |
Corena, Juan Camilo, and Tomoaki Ohtsuki. “Secure and fast aggregation of financial data in cloud-based expense tracking applications.” Journal of Network and Systems Management 20.4 (2012): 534-560. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/790,897, System and Method for Facilitating Programmatic Verification of Transactions, filed Jul. 2, 2015. |
Kyeongwon C., et. al., ‘A Mobile based Anti-Phishing Authentication Scheme using QR code’, IEEE International Conference on Mobile IT Convergence, pp. 109-113, 2011. |
Kim, Young-Gon et. al., ‘A Design of User Authentication System Using QR code Identifying Method’, 6th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology (ICCIT), pp. 31-35, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/455,959, System and Method for Facilitating Programmatic Verification of Transactions, filed Mar. 10, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/258,256, Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, filed Sep. 7, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/258,262, Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, filed Sep. 7, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/159,714, Parameter-Based Computer Evaluation of User Accounts Based on User Account Data Stored in One or More Databases, filed May 19, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/160,663, Systems and Methods for Estimating Past and Prospective Attribute Values Associated With a User Account, filed May 20, 2016. |
International Search Report in PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/050536, dated Dec. 15, 2016. |
“A Single Login Web Service Integrator—WebEntrance”, Yan Zhao, Sixth International World Wide Web Conference, Santa Clara, CA, Apr. 7-11, 1997. |
“Automatic Notification of Web Sites Changes,” Google Groups, Aug. 30, 1995. |
“Boeing Chooses NetMind Enterprise Minder to Help Thousands of Employees Track Web-Based Information,” PR Newswire, Nov. 19, 1998. |
“Caravelle's InfoWatcher 1.1 Keeps an Eye on the Web,” PC Week 1997. |
“Cognisoft Announces IntelliServ, A Revolutionary Intranet Information Management Application; a Powerful Solution that Enables the Right Information to Find the Right User at the Right Time,” Business Wire, p. 8140125, Aug. 14, 1996. |
“FirstFloor and AirMedia Announce Partnership,” Business Wire 1997 (“FirstFloor”). |
“Fujitsu Announces ‘WebAgent’ Application as part of ByeDesk Link Wireless Server Software,” Business Wire, Sep. 1, 1998. |
“Fujitsu Announces Availability of ByeDesk Link for Alpha-Numeric Pagers; Next Step in Empowering Mobile Workforces with ‘Anyplace, Anytime’ Information,” Business Wire, Jul. 9, 1998. |
“Fujitsu Picks NetMind for Wireless Web Agent Software,” Computergram International, Sep. 2, 1998. |
“Fujitsu's ByeDesk Link Now Available on the PalmPilot,” Business Wire, Sep. 21, 1998. |
“GC Tech's GlobelD Payment Internet Commerce Software Supports Microsoft, Merchant Server,” Business Wire, Jan. 21, 1997, p. 1211286. |
“Highly Scalable On-Line Payments via Task Decoupling,” Financial Cryptography First International Conference, 1998, p. 355-373. |
“Minding Web Site Changes,” PC Week, Sep. 14, 1998. |
“NetMind Accepts $7 Million Strategic Investment From Three Prominent VC Firms—BancBoston, SOFTBANK and Draper Fisher Jurvestson,” PR Newswire, Nov. 6, 1998. |
“NetMind Updates the World's Largest Free Web Tracking Service,” PR Newswire, Sep. 18, 1998. |
“The AT&T Internet Difference Engine: Tracking and Viewing Changes on the Web,” World Wide Web 1 (1); Jan. 1998, pp. 27-44. |
“Versatile Intelligent Agents in Commercial Applications,” Google Groups, Dec. 12, 1998. |
“WebEntree: A Web Service Aggregator”, Y. Zhao, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 37, No. 4, 1998. |
A hierarchical approach to wrapper induction, Ion Muslea, Steve Minton, and Craig A. Knoblock. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents 1999, Seattle, WA, 1999. May 1-5,1999. |
Building agents for internet-base supply chain integration, Craig A. Knoblock and Steven Minton. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Agents for Electronic Commerce and Managing the Internet-Enabled Supply Chain, Seattle, WA, 1999. May 1-5, 1999. |
Hagel et al. “The Coming Battle for Customer Information.” Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb. 1997, reprint No. 97104. |
Hummer, Waldemar, Philipp Leitner, and Schahram Dustdar. “Ws-aggregation: distributed of web services data.” Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM, 2011. |
Intelligent caching for information mediators: A kr based approach, Naveen Ashish, Craig A. Knoblock, and Cyrus Shahabi. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Knowledge Representation meets Databases (KRDB), Seattle, WA, 1998. Presented May 1, 1998. |
Johner et al. “Sign on with IBM's Global Sign-On!” IBM manual, Nov. 1998. Part 1, in 184 pages. |
Johner et al. “Sign on with IBM's Global Sign-On!” IBM manual, Nov. 1998. Part 2, pp. 166-307. |
Modeling web sources for information integration, Craig A. Knoblock, Steven Minton, Jose Luis Ambite, Naveen Ashish, Pragnesh Jay Modi, Ion Muslea, Andrew G. Philpot, and Sheila Tejada. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI, 1998. Jul. 26-30, 1998. |
Optimizing Information Agents by Selectively Materializing Data, Naveen Ashish, Craig A. Knoblock, and Cyrus Shahabi. In Proceedings of the AAAI'98 Workshop on AI and Information Integration, Madison, WI, 1998. Jul. 26-30, 1998. |
Part 1 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier. |
Part 10 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier. |
Part 11 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier. |
Part 2 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier. |
Part 3 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier. |
Part 4 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier. |
Part 5 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier. |
Part 6 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier. |
Part 7 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier. |
Part 8 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier. |
Part 9 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier. |
Semi-automatic wrapper generation for Internet information sources, Naveen Ashish and Craig A. Knoblock. In Proceedings of the Second IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, Kiawah Island, SC, 1997. Jun. 24-27, 1997. |
“Web Interface Definition Language (WIDL)”, W3 Consortium submission from webMethods, Inc., Sep. 22, 1997. |
The ariadne approach to web-based information integration, Craig A. Knoblock and Steven Minton. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(5), Sep./Oct. 1998. |
WebVCR product bulletin and documentation, NetResults Corporation, 1996. We understand that, with respect to issues raised by this litigation, the WebVCR product as available in 1996 provided substantially the same functionality as is described at http://www.n2r6.com/fs_webvcr_info.html. |
WebVCR web service, which is described by at least the following references: The WebVCR product bulletin and documentation, NetResults Corporation, 1996 and http://www.n2r6.comns_webvcr_info.html. |
Wrapper generation for semi-structured Internet sources, Naveen Ashish and Craig A. Knoblock. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Management of Semistructured Data, Tucson, AZ, 1997. May 13-15, 1997. |
Wrapper induction for semistructured, web-based information sources, Ion Muslea, Steven Minton, and Craig A. Knoblock. In Proceedings of the Conference on Automated Learning and Discovery Workshop on Learning from Text and the Web, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998. Jun. 11-13, 1998. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62001452 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14790840 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15258299 | US | |
Parent | 14719110 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 14790840 | US |