The manner in which functionality is accessed in certain environments, such as mobile device environments, may impact performance and/or battery life. Accordingly, what is needed are a system and method that addresses these issues.
For a more complete understanding, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings in which:
It is understood that the following disclosure provides many different embodiments or examples. Specific examples of components and arrangements are described below to simplify the present disclosure. These are, of course, merely examples and are not intended to be limiting. In addition, the present disclosure may repeat reference numerals and/or letters in the various examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not in itself dictate a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations discussed.
Referring to
With respect to the device 100, the amount of available memory, how the memory 102 is structured (e.g., segment sizes), and how the memory is managed (e.g., how much memory is allocated to the superblock 104, how swapping occurs when another application needs physical memory, and how multiple applications are handled) are generally outside of the control of the superblock 104. However, mobile devices frequently provide a separate memory space for each application that is being run and so must keep track of the memory boundaries for each application. This tracking requires resources, such as processing time and power.
Furthermore, as a user switches between applications (e.g., switches contexts), the device 100 may have to swap instructions into and out of physical memory, which impacts performance and battery life. While context switching occurs in other devices, such as desktop and laptop computers, the resource impact used for those context switches is generally lower due to the greater amount of resources available for such devices compared to mobile devices. For example, as mobile devices generally have a smaller memory footprint compared to larger devices such as desktop and laptop computers, not only will a mobile device likely need to swap files in and out of memory when a context switch occurs, but the processor load and battery life will likely be negatively impacted on the mobile device more than would occur on larger devices having more resources. In addition, while a single application may use multi-threading and therefore require the allocation of processor time for different threads, swapping between applications is generally a more resource intensive task for a mobile device.
With respect to the instructions of the superblock 104, additional functionality may be desired for the superblock application that is not provided by the instructions. For example, the superblock application may not currently support a particular type of data and/or operation (e.g., audio, video, email, and/or file transfer) and it may be desirable for the superblock application to do so. To provide such additional functionality, instructions would have to be added to the superblock 102 to give the superblock application the ability to support the data type and/or operation. This process typically entails reworking the superblock application to include the desired functionality and then releasing the updated version of the superblock application for use. Depending on the complexity and nature of the superblock application and the desired functionality, this process may take a substantial amount of time, effort, and/or expense.
One alternative is to use another application to provide the desired functionality, but this may not be a satisfactory solution. For example, assume the superblock 102 provides a superblock application that needs email functionality. On current mobile devices, a user would typically select a link in the superblock application, such as an email address. Selection of the link would launch an email application (or switch context to an email application if one is already running), which removes the user from the superblock application and places the user in the email application. The user would then compose and send the email before switching back to the superblock application. This process of leaving the superblock application, performing some other function, and then returning to the superblock application is currently a common occurrence for mobile device users.
However, this process is disruptive, difficult to manage, and pulls the user away from the superblock application while the provider of the superblock application may want the user to continue to stay in their application. Furthermore, the functions of the superblock application are not available while in the other application, and so the user may have to switch back and forth between the superblock application and the other application in order to interact with both applications. This is inefficient and frustrating for the user, and may also increase the number of errors in the text of the email since both applications are not simultaneously available for reference.
Another example is a video window for a phone call. Assume a user is in the superblock application and has a question about data that the superblock application is displaying. In order to call and visually interact with someone about the question and still have access to the data, the user has to conduct the call while switching back and forth between the video window of the call and the superblock application. This is extremely disruptive to the user and limits the benefits of the video call, which include the ability to interact with someone on a visual basis rather than just an audio basis.
Yet another example is a user walking around a shop floor, engaged in his or her duties. In order to join a virtual meeting, the user will have to exit the superblock application, find and/or enter the meeting information using another application, and join the meeting using the other application. As with the preceding example, this is extremely disruptive to the user, wastes time, and lowers productivity.
Referring to
The function block 200 includes instructions for providing the superblock 104 with one or more functions (e.g., capabilities) that are not otherwise possessed by the superblock 104. Such functions are illustrated in part with respect to
To accomplish this, the function block 200 may be provided as a set of instructions that are included in the superblock 104. For example, the function block 200 may be provided as a software developer's kit (SDK) or as an otherwise independent module by a developer unrelated to the superblock 104. The developer of the superblock 104 may then compile or otherwise include the function block instructions in the superblock 104. This ensures that the function block 200 will occupy the same memory space as the superblock 104 unless otherwise placed elsewhere by the mobile device 100. For example, as the superblock 104 likely has little or no control over how the mobile device 100 handles memory management, the mobile device may actually separate some or all of the instructions making up the superblock 104 and the function block 200. However, by including the instructions for the function block 200 within the instructions for the superblock 104, the likelihood that the instructions will be separated may be minimized. The independent nature of the function block 200 means that the developer of the superblock 104 needs little information about the operation of the function block 100 other than how to access the services.
Furthermore, the function block 200 may be handled by developers as a single block of instructions or as multiple blocks depending on the operating system environment. For example, the function block 200 may be handled as a single block in an environment such as iOS (a mobile operating system developed and distributed by Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.), while the function block 200 may be handled as multiple blocks in an environment such as Android (a mobile operating system released as open source by Google Inc. of Mountain View, Calif.).
The function block 200 may be configurable after being distributed as part of the superblock application. For example, the function block 200 may provide access to certain parameters, such as network address information of a server for the external services 204. Other parameters, such as call parameters (e.g., payload size) may also be configurable.
The function block 200 may provide services in a self-contained manner (e.g., internal services that may be provided without needing support outside of the device 100) or may use one or more external services 204. The external services 204 may be provided via a server, a peer-to-peer endpoint, and/or by any other source with which the function block 200 is able to communicate. For example, the function block 200 may be able to provide audio/video playback services for a file stored in the memory 102 without needing anything outside of the device 100, assuming the device 100 includes a screen for displaying the video and speakers and/or a headset for sound output.
However, for an audio/video call session, the function block 200 needs to connect to another device in order to establish the session, even though it can play audio/video locally. In order to connect to the other device, the function block 200 may use the services 204. Accordingly, how the function block 200 handles a particular service request from the superblock 104 may depend on the specific service and the resource needs of that service. From the point of view of the superblock 104, whether the function block 200 uses local and/or external services does not matter as the superblock 104 is simply requesting the service from the function block 200. In embodiments that use an external service 204, the function block 200 is the entity between the superblock 104 and the external service 204, but does not control either the superblock 104 or the external service 204.
In the case of a request from the external services 204 (e.g., an incoming file transfer or phone call), the handling performed by the function block 200 may also depend on the specific service and the resource needs of that service. For example, the function block 200 may send a notification to the superblock 104 and wait for a response, or may handle the externally initiated request according to defined parameters.
Returning to the previous examples, the function block 200 may provide the superblock application with email functionality that enables a user to receive notifications, check email, and compose/edit/send/manage email without leaving the superblock application. For the audio/video phone call, the function block 200 may provide a video window for the phone call within the display of the superblock application, enabling a user to simultaneously see the video window and the superblock application. The video window may be resizable and/or movable. For the user walking around on the shop floor, the function block 200 may enable the user to receive a meeting notification, accept the meeting, and enter the meeting, all within the superblock application. To accomplish this, the function block 200 may hook into the meeting information (e.g., on a server) and render this in the superblock application.
Referring to
In the present example, the set of instructions that make up the function block 200 may be used with many different applications and on many different platforms and accessed via the API 202, although some customization may be performed if needed or desired. The function block 200 may be viewed as a set of instructions providing intelligence needed to perform the tasks described herein, and that set of instructions may be compiled or otherwise incorporated into the instructions of the superblock 104. As the instructions can be incorporated into many different applications to satisfy many different needs, some of the capabilities provided by the function block 200 may not be used by a particular application, but may still be present. In other embodiments, functionality that is not desired may be removed to minimize the footprint of the function block 200.
One embodiment of a header for the function block 200 (referred to in the header text as the Amadeo block) may be as follows:
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
At time t2, the superblock application calls the function block API or an external service contacts the function block 200, and the function block 200 instructions (as indicated by line 404) are executed to provide the service requested by the API call or handle the contact from the external service 204. The instructions for the superblock 104 and function block 200 are executed from time t2 until time t3, at which time the function block 200 is no longer needed and is shut down (although this may include going into the waiting state for purposes of example). The superblock instructions are executed from time t3 until time t4, at which time the function block 200 is again called (as indicated by line 406). The instructions for the superblock 104 and function block 200 are executed from time t4 until time t5, at which time the function block 200 is no longer needed and is shut down (although this may include going into the waiting state for purposes of example) while the superblock instructions continue being executed.
Accordingly, while two different applications on a mobile device would not typically execute concurrently, the execution of the instructions for the superblock 104 and function block 200 as shown in
Referring to
In step 502, the superblock 104 unlocks the function block 200. For example, the unlock process may indicate that the superblock 104 is authorized to unlock some or all of the functionality provided by the function block 200 by providing a key or other authorization indicator. This step may not only limit the superblock 104 to authorized functionality, but may also insure that other applications cannot access the function block's capabilities. In step 504, the function block 200 is initialized. It is noted that these steps may occur during initialization of the superblock 104 or may occur later, such as when the superblock 104 calls the function block 200 for a particular function. For example, steps 502 and 504 may occur when the superblock application is launched and may not be repeated while the superblock application remains open, may occur each time the superblock application calls the function block API for a service, may occur only for particular services, may occur for defined periods of time (e.g., the function block 200 may lock every half hour), and/or using other parameters. It is understood that steps 502 and 504 may be reversed in some embodiments.
During initialization or at another time, policies may be applied. For example, a cost policy may require that any available Wi-Fi network is used before a 3G network. A security policy may require that a virtual private network (VPN) be used whenever available. Backgrounding may be selected as an option when available to allow the superblock application to run in the background. Accordingly, the function block 200 may be configured to provide for specific behavior if desired and this behavior may in turn limit or enhance the capabilities of the superblock 104.
In steps 506 and 508, the superblock 104 may provide login information to the function block 200, and the function block 200 may use this information to access the external services 204. For example, if the function block 200 needs authentication credentials to access the external services 204, steps 506 and 508 may be used to gain access to those external services. In some embodiments, steps 506 and/or 508 may be combined with step 502 and the unlocking of the function block 200 may include logging into whatever external services are authorized and/or available.
In step 510, the function block 200 and the superblock 104 may perform a capability exchange. More specifically, the function block 200 may determine whether (1) the function block 200 has a particular capability, (2) whether the function block 200 can render that capability, and (3) whether the superblock 104 can render that capability. For example, the function block 200 may determine that the function block 200 has the capability to capture audio and play that captured audio through a speaker.
Next, the function block 200 may determine whether it can render that capability by checking, for example, to see whether there is an available microphone (mic) input and an available speaker output. If one or both of the mic and speaker are not present, then the function block 200 has the capability to handle the audio, but not the capability to render the audio. The superblock 104 is not involved in this process as it is not needed to render the audio, so the third determination may not be made. Although the superblock 104 is not involved in rendering the audio, it is understood that the superblock 104 may visually represent the audio, such as by means of an icon, one or more control buttons (e.g., play and stop), and/or other visual representations.
In another example, the superblock 104 may desire to display video. Again, the function block 200 may determine that the function block 200 has the capability to handle the video. Next, the function block 200 may determine whether it can render that capability by checking, for example, to see whether there is an available screen. If a screen is not present, then the function block 200 has the capability to handle the video, but not the capability to render the video. In this example, the superblock 104 is involved in this process as it is needed to provide a video window to render the video (e.g., the function block 200 may provide the video data to be rendered and the superblock 104 may place that video data in a video window), so the third determination is made.
By making such determinations, the function block 200 is able to notify the superblock 104 of the available functions. If a function needs the external services 204, lack of a connection may prevent the function block 200 from delivering external services to the superblock 104, but local services may still be provided. It is understood that while a screen, speaker, or other destination (e.g., a sink) may not be available, the function block 200 may handle some services using a secondary sink, such as a memory to which the video or audio is stored for later use.
With additional reference to
In step 604, a determination is made as to whether the function block 200 has the particular capability. For example, whether the function block 200 has the capability to support an audio/video call. If the determination of step 604 is that the function block 200 does not have the particular capability, the method 600 moves to step 606 and the capability is indicated as not being available. It is noted that if a particular capability has not been unlocked, the function block 200 may indicate the capability is not available even if the function block 200 can actually provide the capability. If the determination of step 604 is that the function block 200 does have the particular capability, the method 600 moves to step 608.
In step 608, a determination is made as to whether the function block 200 can render the capability as described previously. This step may determine whether the device 100 supports the needed functionality (e.g., has a microphone if audio input is needed or a speaker if audio output is needed). If the determination of step 608 is that the function block 200 cannot render the capability, the method 600 moves to step 606 and the capability is indicated as not being available. If the determination of step 608 is that the function block 200 does have the capability, the method 600 moves to step 610.
In step 610, a determination is made as to whether an external service 204 is needed to provide the capability. If the determination of step 610 is that an external service 204 is not needed, the method 600 moves to step 614. If the determination of step 610 is that an external service 204 is needed, the method 600 moves to step 612.
In step 612, a determination is made as to whether a needed external service 204 is available. For example, the external service 204 may be offline (e.g., a server used to provide the service may be non-responsive or the device 100 may have minimal or no network connectivity). This step may also determine whether the superblock application is authorized to access the external service 204 (e.g., whether the external service will allow access by the superblock application). If the determination of step 612 is that the needed external service 204 is not available, the method 600 moves to step 606 and the capability is indicated as not being available. If the determination of step 612 is that the needed external service 204 is available, the method 600 moves to step 614.
In step 614, a determination is made as to whether the superblock 104 is needed to render the capability as described previously. If the determination of step 614 is that the superblock 104 is not needed to render the capability, the method 600 moves to step 618 and the service is indicated as available (e.g., a capability list is updated and/or the service is provided). If the determination of step 614 is that the superblock 104 is needed to render the capability, the method 600 moves to step 616.
In step 616, a determination is made as to whether the superblock 104 can render the capability as described previously. If the determination of step 616 is that the superblock 104 cannot render the capability, the method 600 moves to step 606 and the capability is indicated as not being available. If the determination of step 616 is that the superblock 104 does have the capability, the method 600 moves to step 618.
The superblock 104 and/or function block 200 may use a table or other structure for listing available capabilities. For example, a table may identify a particular service, whether the superblock 104 is authorized to access the service, whether the function block 200 can support the service, whether the function block 200 can render the service, whether the superblock 104 is needed to render the service, and whether the superblock 104 can render the service if needed. It is understood that this information may not be provided in detail in all embodiments, but may be condensed to a simple indication of whether the service is available or not. However, by providing additional levels of detail, more useful indicators may be provided. For example, the superblock application may be able to indicate that a particular service is not authorized or that speakers are not available, rather than simply indicating that audio service is not available.
Table 1 illustrates one embodiment of a mapping table that may be used to track the capabilities that the function block 200 can provide to the superblock 104 on the device 100. It is understand that the mapping table may vary for the same function block 200, superblock 104, and device 100 in different scenarios, such as whether the device 100 has network access or not when needed for a particular service. For purposes of illustration, the first column lists services supported by the function block 200, the second column identifies whether that service is supported by the device (e.g., whether the function block 200 can render the service), the third column identifies whether the superblock application can render the service (if needed), the fourth column identifies whether the external services 204 support the service (if needed), and the fifth column identifies where the superblock application has authorization rights to that service.
In some embodiments, the service column may be limited to services that the superblock application is authorized to access. For example, if function block 200 supports instant messaging but the superblock application 104 is not authorized to use this feature, the service may or may not show up in the mapping table depending on the particular implementation. An additional column may be used to identify whether a needed external service is currently available or the fourth column may be used to show this information.
For purposes of example, the first service involves playing a video from a file and is supported by both the device 100 and the superblock 104. The external services 204 are not needed and are marked as not applicable. The second service involves playing a local audio file and is supported by the device 100. The superblock 104 and external services 204 are not needed and are marked as not applicable. The third service involves playing a streaming audio file and is supported by the device 100 and the external services 204. The superblock 104 is not needed and is marked as not applicable. The fourth service involves content sharing and is supported by the device 100 and the superblock 104, but not the external services 204. As the external services 204 are needed for sharing in this example, this service is not available to the superblock application. The fifth service involves instant messaging and is supported by the device 100 and the external services 204, but not the superblock 104.
The sixth service involves a whiteboard, but the superblock 104 is not authorized to access this service, and so the capabilities are not checked. In other embodiments, capabilities for unauthorized services may be checked and, if supported, the superblock application may notify the user that the service is not authorized. In such embodiments, a dialog or other option may appear to allow the user to subscribe or otherwise gain access to the service if allowed.
With additional reference to
It is understood that the source/sink model provided by the source 632 and sink 634 may be viewed as generic. For example, at the device level, the source 632 and sink 634 operate to read/send data. At the network interface level, each side acts as both source/sink because network interfaces allow for read/write simultaneously in most modern devices. In contrast, a microphone is a source and a speaker is a sink. A speaker may serve as a sink for multiple data in some cases, such as if multiple audio sources are mixed into the single speaker. In this scenario, the source for rendering audio data may be a microphone, network audio encoded data, a music file on the device, and/or other sources. The source/sink model can also be considered for service level consumer/producer models. For example, the function block 200 may be viewed as a source for presenting client side capabilities to a server and at the same time may be viewed as a sink for rendering capabilities presented by the server.
With additional reference to
In the present example, one or more additional flow layers represented by line 650 may also present. For example, line 650 may represent whether an audio hold exists. If the audio has been placed on hold, the function block 200 will notify the audio pipeline to stop (e.g., the switch will be opened). The audio capture may continue, but it will not be rendered (e.g., sent to the external services represented by sink 644) as the circuit formed by the function block 200 will no longer be complete.
Referring again to
In steps 516 and 518, the superblock 104 may finalize any service requests and shutdown the function block 200. For example, if the superblock application is closing, the superblock 104 may use one or more API calls to the function block 200 to notify the function block 200 that the function block 200 should close any open ports (e.g., with an external service 204) and close down any running processes.
Referring to
In step 702, the superblock 104 issues a request for a service to the function block 200 using an API call or another suitable method. In step 704, the function block 200 obtains any needed support from the external services 204. In step 706, the function block 200 provides the service to the superblock 104. In step 708, the function block 200 may repeat step 512 and either shut down or enter the wait mode depending on whether the function block 200 is operating under the static model or the dynamic model.
Referring to
In step 808, a determination is made as to whether the external service is available. If the determination of step 808 indicates that the external service is available, the method 800 moves to step 810, where any parameters needed for communications and/or service provision may be negotiated between the function block 200 and external service 204. Such parameters may include both signaling and media parameters such as bandwidth, codecs, and/or similar information, and would typically depend on the particular service.
The method 800 then moves to step 806 where the service is provided by the function block 200. If the determination of step 808 indicates that the external service is not available, the method 800 moves to step 812. In step 812, the function block 200 may indicate that the service is not available. For example, the function block 200 may indicate that the server is not responding or that there is no network connectivity for the device 100.
Referring to
In step 902, an external service 204 issues a notification to the function block 200 that the external service 204 has something for the superblock 104. In step 904, the function block 200 may pass the notification to the superblock 104. It is understood that step 904 may not actually pass on the notification, but that the notification of step 902 may trigger functionality within the function block 200 that serves to notify the superblock 104. For example, if the notification of step 902 is about an incoming phone call, the function block 200 may receive the notification, initiate a phone response display (e.g., a display with options for accepting or rejecting the call), and provide the information to the superblock 104 in that manner. In another example, the notification of step 902 may be a presence change (e.g., a user changes status from offline to online), and the function block 200 may update a presence indicator within the superblock application's display. In still another example, the function block 200 may use an event system and send event notifications to the superblock 104. Accordingly, some notifications may require action on the part of a user of the superblock application, while other notifications may not.
In the present example, the notification requires a response and the superblock 104 responds in step 906 by requesting and/or accepting the service (e.g., a phone call). In step 908, the function block 200 handles services between the superblock 104 and the external service 204. In other words, the function block 200 serves as an interface between the external service 204 and the superblock 104. For example, the function block 200 may bridge the phone call, handle call waiting and other call features, and otherwise provide support for the superblock application. In step 910, the function block 200 may enter wait mode after the services have been provided.
Referring to
In step 1008, a determination is made as to whether the service request has been approved by the superblock 104. If the determination of step 1008 indicates that the request has not been approved, the method 1000 moves to step 1010, where the notification may be rejected, ignored, or otherwise handled. It is understood that the actual response of the function block 200 in step 1010 may vary depending on the notification type. For example, the function block 200 may indicate to the external service 204 that the call is rejected. If the determination of step 1008 indicates that the request has been approved, the method 1000 moves to step 1012, where the function block 200 may handle the service provision.
Returning to step 1004, if the determination of step 1004 indicates that instructions are not needed, the method 1000 moves to step 1014. In step 1014, a determination is made as to whether the superblock 104 is to be updated based on the notification. If the determination of step 1014 indicates that the superblock 104 is not to be updated, the method 1000 moves to step 1010, where the notification may be rejected, ignored, or otherwise handled. If the determination of step 1014 indicates that the superblock 104 is to be updated, the method 1000 moves to step 1016, where the update may be performed. For example, another user's presence status may be updated from online to offline or vice versa.
Referring again to
Referring to
The system 1100 may use any operating system (or multiple operating systems), including various versions of operating systems provided by Microsoft (such as WINDOWS), Apple (such as Mac OS X), UNIX, and LINUX, and may include operating systems specifically developed for handheld devices, personal computers, servers, and embedded devices depending on the use of the system 1100. The operating system, as well as other instructions (e.g., for the superblock 104 and function block 1100), may be stored in the memory unit 1104 and executed by the processor 1102. For example, if the system 1100 is the device 100, the memory unit 1104 may include instructions for performing some or all of the message sequences and methods described herein.
Referring to
For purposes of example, the function block 200 may be accessed by the API 202 and may communicate with an operating system 1204 of the device 100 of
The function block 200 may include multiple components and layers that support the functionality required to perform the operations requested by the superblock 104. For example, the function block 200 may include a softswitch 1206, a management layer 1208, an encryption/decryption module 1210, a feature layer 1212, a protocol layer 1214, a speech-to-text engine 1216, a text-to-speech engine 1218, a language conversion engine 1220, an out-of-network connectivity module 1222, a connection from other networks module 1224, a p-commerce (e.g., peer commerce) engine 1226 that includes a p-commerce agent and a p-commerce broker, and a cellular network interface module 1228.
Each of these components/layers may be further divided into multiple modules. For example, the softswitch 1206 may include a call control module, an instant messaging (IM) control module, a resource control module, a CALEA (Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act) agent, a media control module, a peer control module, a signaling agent, a fax control module, and a routing module.
The management layer 1208 may include modules for presence (i.e., network presence), peer management (detecting peers and notifying peers of being online), firewall management (navigation and management), media management, resource management, profile management, authentication, roaming, fax management, and media playback/recording management.
The encryption/decryption module 1210 may provide encryption for outgoing packets and decryption for incoming packets. In the present example, the encryption/decryption module 1210 provides application level encryption at the source, rather than at the network. However, it is understood that the encryption/decryption module 1210 may provide encryption at the network in some embodiments.
The feature layer 1212 may provide support for various features such as voice, video, IM, data, voicemail, file transfer, file sharing, class 5 features, short message service (SMS), interactive voice response (IVR), faxes, and other resources. The protocol layer 1214 may include protocols supported by the function block 200, including SIP, HTTP, HTTPS, STUN, RTP, SRTP, and ICMP. It is understood that these are examples only, and that fewer or more protocols may be supported.
The speech-to-text engine 1216 converts speech received by the function block 200 (e.g., via a microphone or network) into text, the text-to-speech engine 1218 converts text received by the function block 200 into speech (e.g., for output via a speaker), and the language conversion engine 1220 may be configured to convert inbound or outbound information (text or speech) from one language to another language. The out-of-network connectivity module 1222 may be used to handle connections between the function block 200 and the external services 204, and the connection from other networks module 1224 handles incoming connection attempts from the external services 204. The cellular network interface module 1228 may be used to interact with a wireless network.
While the preceding description shows and describes one or more embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. For example, various steps illustrated within a particular flow chart or sequence diagram may be combined or further divided. In addition, steps described in one flow chart or diagram may be incorporated into another flow chart or diagram. Furthermore, the described functionality may be provided by hardware and/or software, and may be distributed or combined into a single platform. Additionally, functionality described in a particular example may be achieved in a manner different than that illustrated, but is still encompassed within the present disclosure. Therefore, the claims should be interpreted in a broad manner, consistent with the present disclosure.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/049,891, filed on Feb. 22, 2016, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONALITY TO EXISTING SOFTWARE IN AN INTEGRATED MANNER, which published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016-0173577 on Jun. 16, 2016. U.S. application Ser. No. 15/049,891 is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/690,619, filed Apr. 20, 2015, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONALITY TO EXISTING SOFTWARE IN AN INTEGRATED MANNER, which published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015-0229706 on Aug. 13, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,270,744, issued on Feb. 23, 2016. U.S. application Ser. No. 14/690,619 is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/024,027, filed on Sep. 11, 2013, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONALITY TO EXISTING SOFTWARE IN AN INTEGRATED MANNER, published as U.S. Application Publication No. 2015-0026700 on Jan. 22, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,027,032, issued on May 5, 2015. U.S. application Ser. No. 14/024,027 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/846,958, filed on Jul. 16, 2013, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONALITY TO EXISTING SOFTWARE IN AN INTEGRATED MANNER. U.S. application Ser. Nos. 15/049,891, 14/690,619, 14/024,027 and 61/846,958, U.S. Application Publication Nos. 2016-0173577, 2015-0229706 and 2015-0026700, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,270,744 and 9,027,032 are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5442637 | Nguyen | Aug 1995 | A |
5761309 | Ohashi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790637 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5818447 | Wolf et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5889762 | Pajuvirta et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6031818 | Lo et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6128283 | Sabaa et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141687 | Blair | Oct 2000 | A |
6161082 | Goldberg et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6195694 | Chen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202084 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219638 | Padmanabhan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6298129 | Culver et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311150 | Ramaswamy et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343067 | Drottar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360196 | Poznaski et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389016 | Sabaa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6438376 | Elliott et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473425 | Bellaton et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6574668 | Gubbi et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6606112 | Falco | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6741691 | Ritter et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754181 | Elliott et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766373 | Beadle et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6826613 | Wang et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6836765 | Sussman | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842460 | Olkkonen et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850769 | Grob et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6898413 | Yip et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912278 | Hamilton | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6940826 | Simard et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6963555 | Brenner et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6975718 | Pearce et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6987756 | Ravindranath et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6999575 | Sheinbein | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6999932 | Zhou | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006508 | Bondy et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010109 | Gritzer et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013155 | Ruf et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7079529 | Khuc | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7080158 | Squire | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7092385 | Gallant et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117526 | Short | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7123710 | Ravishankar | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7184415 | Chaney et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185114 | Hariharasubrahmanian | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7272377 | Cox et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7302496 | Metzger | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7304985 | Sojka et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7345999 | Su et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346044 | Chou et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7353252 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7353255 | Acharya et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7412374 | Seiler et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7457279 | Scott et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7477282 | Firestone et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487248 | Moran et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7512652 | Appelman et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7542472 | Gerendai et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7564843 | Manjunatha et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7570743 | Barclay et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574523 | Traversat et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590758 | Takeda et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7613171 | Zehavi et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623476 | Ravikumar et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623516 | Chaturvedi et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7656870 | Ravikumar et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664495 | Bonner et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7769881 | Matsubara et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774495 | Pabla et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778187 | Chaturvedi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782866 | Walsh et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7917584 | Arthursson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8009586 | Chaturvedi et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8065418 | Abuan et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8200796 | Margulis | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8407576 | Yin et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
20010050923 | Park et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020031212 | O'Neil et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020037000 | Park et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038282 | Montgomery | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042769 | Gujral et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062285 | Amann et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064167 | Khan et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020080719 | Parkvall et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087887 | Busam et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097150 | Sandelman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120757 | Sutherland et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124096 | Loguinov et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143548 | Korall et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150110 | Inbar et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152325 | Elgebaly et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156844 | Maehiro | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166053 | Wilson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173303 | Shibutani | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176404 | Girard | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178087 | Henderson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184310 | Traversat et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009565 | Arao | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031210 | Harris | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035441 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043764 | Kim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030044020 | Aboba et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046056 | Godoy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046585 | Minnick | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061025 | Abir | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061481 | Levine et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030072485 | Guerin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076815 | Miller et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078858 | Angelopoulos et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088676 | Smith et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105812 | Flowers, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110047 | Santosuosso | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115251 | Fredrickson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126213 | Betzler | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135569 | Khakoo et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137939 | Dunning et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158722 | Lord | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163525 | Hendriks et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163697 | Pabla et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172145 | Nguyen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174707 | Grob et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177186 | Goodman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177422 | Tararoukhine et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187650 | Moore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202480 | Swami | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212772 | Harris | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214955 | Kim | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217171 | Von Stuermer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217318 | Choi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220121 | Konishi et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229715 | Baratakke et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040005877 | Vaananen | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024879 | Dingman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034776 | Fernando et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034793 | Yuan | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039781 | LaVallee et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044517 | Palmquist | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052234 | Ameigeiras et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062267 | Minami et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068567 | Moran et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100973 | Prasad | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103212 | Takeuchi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128554 | Maher, III et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133689 | Vasisht | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139225 | Takahashi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139228 | Takeda et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139230 | Kim | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143678 | Chari et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148434 | Matsubara et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153858 | Hwang | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158471 | Davis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162871 | Pabla et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193599 | Liu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203834 | Mahany | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213184 | Hu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040228279 | Midtun et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240399 | Corrao et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249885 | Petropoulakis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249953 | Fernandez et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260952 | Newman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267527 | Creamer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267938 | Shoroff et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268257 | Mudusuru | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004982 | Vernon et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008024 | Newpol et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015502 | Kang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033843 | Shahi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033985 | Xu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050227 | Michelman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071481 | Danieli | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086309 | Galli et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091407 | Vaziri et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105524 | Stevens et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119005 | Segal et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050120073 | Cho | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130650 | Creamer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132009 | Solie | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136911 | Csapo et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138119 | Saridakis | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138128 | Baniel et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143105 | Okamoto | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144288 | Liao | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050187781 | Christensen | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187957 | Kramer et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195802 | Klein et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198499 | Salapaka et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201357 | Poyhonen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201485 | Fay | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050208947 | Bahl | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220017 | Brand et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246193 | Roever et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249196 | Ansari et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050254440 | Sorrell | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050270992 | Sanzgiri et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286519 | Ravikumar et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002355 | Baek et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060062180 | Sayeedi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069775 | Artobello et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072506 | Sayeedi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060120375 | Ravikumar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060121902 | Jagadeesan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060121986 | Pelkey et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060148516 | Reddy et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165029 | Melpignano et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168643 | Howard et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171534 | Baughman | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060182100 | Li et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183476 | Morita et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187926 | Imai et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195402 | Malina et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203750 | Ravikumar et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060205436 | Liu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218624 | Ravikumar et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230166 | Philyaw | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233117 | Tomsu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246903 | Kong et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258289 | Dua | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016921 | Levi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019545 | Alt et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025270 | Sylvain | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070078785 | Bush et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082671 | Feng et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070110043 | Girard | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111794 | Hogan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116224 | Burke et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130253 | Newson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136459 | Roche et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070165629 | Chaturvedi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070190987 | Vaananen | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206563 | Silver et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239892 | Ott et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253435 | Keller et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260359 | Benson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274276 | Laroia et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280253 | Rooholamini et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294626 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297430 | Nykanen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005328 | Shively et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019285 | John et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080032695 | Zhu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046984 | Bohmer et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080069105 | Costa et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080392 | Walsh et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091813 | Bodlaender | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080123685 | Varma et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130639 | Costa-Requena et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168440 | Regnier et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192756 | Damola et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080235362 | Kjesbu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235511 | O'Brien et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080244718 | Frost et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250408 | Tsui et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273541 | Pharn | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080320096 | Szeto | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320565 | Buch et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003322 | Isumi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006076 | Jindal | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090052399 | Silver et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055473 | Synnergren | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090088150 | Chaturvedi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090136016 | Gornoi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090156217 | Bajpai | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182815 | Czechowski et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192976 | Spivack et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090234967 | Yu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240821 | Juncker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090257433 | Mutikainen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090300673 | Bachet et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327516 | Amishima et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011108 | Clark et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011111 | Vizaei | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100049980 | Barriga et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100058353 | Turski | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077023 | Eriksson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100107205 | Foti | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100174783 | Zarom | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191954 | Kim et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100223047 | Christ | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100279670 | Ghai et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299150 | Fein et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299313 | Orsini et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312832 | Allen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312897 | Allen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110040836 | Allen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110099612 | Lee et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110122864 | Cherifi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110141220 | Miura | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145687 | Grigsby et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110307556 | Chaturvedi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314134 | Foti | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320821 | Alkhatib et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120078609 | Chaturvedi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120124191 | Lyon | May 2012 | A1 |
20120263144 | Nix | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130067004 | Logue et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130106989 | Gage et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130111064 | Mani et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125145 | Balmori Labra et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20150026700 | Chaturvedi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1404082 | Mar 2004 | EP |
160339 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1638275 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1848163 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1988697 | Nov 2008 | EP |
1988698 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2005-94600 | Apr 2005 | JP |
10-2005-0030548 | Mar 2005 | KR |
WO 03079635 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004063843 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2005009019 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2006064047 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006075677 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2008099420 | Aug 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2006/040312, dated Mar. 2, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2006/047841, dated Sep. 12, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2007/002424, dated Aug. 14, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2007/068820, dated Jun. 11, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2007/068821, dated Jun. 14, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2007068823, dated Jun. 1, 2008. |
Jeff Tyson, “How Instant Messaging Works”, www.verizon.com/learningcenter, Mar. 9, 2005. |
Rory Bland, et al, “P2P Routing” Mar. 2002. |
Rosenberg, “STUN—Simple Traversal of UDP Through NAT”, Sep. 2002, XP015005058. |
Salman A. Baset, et al, “An Analysis of the Skype Peer-To-Peer Internet Telephony Protocol”, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, Sep. 15, 2004. |
Singh et al., “Peer-to Peer Internet Telephony Using SIP”, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, Oct. 31, 2004, XP-002336408. |
Sinha, S. and Oglieski, A., A TCP Tutorial, Nov. 1998 (Date posted on Internet: Apr. 19, 2001) [Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//www.ssfnet.org/Exchange/tcp/tcpTutorialNotes.html>]. |
Pejman Khadivi, Terence D. Todd and Dongmei Zhao, “Handoff trigger nodes for hybrid IEEE 802.11 WLAN/cellular networks,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks, pp. 164-170, Oct. 18, 2004. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2008/078142, dated Mar. 27, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2008/084950, dated Apr. 27, 2009. |
Hao Wang, Skype VoIP service-architecture and comparison, In: INFOTECH Seminar Advanced Communication Services (ASC), 2005, pp. 4, 7, 8. |
Seta, N.; Miyajima, H.; Zhang, L;; Fujii, T., “All-SIP Mobility: Session Continuity on Handover in Heterogeneous Access Environment,” Vehicular Technology Conference, 2007. VTC 2007-Spring. IEEE 65th, Apr. 22-25, 2007, pp. 1121-1126. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2008/075141, dated Mar. 5, 2009. |
Qian Zhang; Chuanxiong Guo; Zihua Guo; Wenwu Zhu, “Efficient mobility management for vertical handoff between WWAN and WLAN,” Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 41. issue 11, Nov. 2003, pp. 102-108. |
Isaacs, Ellen et al., “Hubbub: A sound-enhanced mobile instant messenger that supports awareness and opportunistic interactions,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; vol. 4, Issue No. 1; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Apr. 20-25, 2002; pp. 179-186. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2008/084950; Jun. 1, 2010; 5 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2014/039777, dated Sep. 30, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2014/39782, dated Oct. 17, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2015/43633, Oct. 26, 2015, 21 pgs. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2015/43630 (related application), Oct. 30, 2015, 20 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2014/039777; Jan. 28, 2016; 8 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US14/39782; Apr. 19, 2016; 9 pgs. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/024870; Oct. 26, 2011; 12 pages. |
J. Rosenberg et al. “Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)”, draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-06, Mar. 5, 2007. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/028685; Nov. 9, 2011; 10 pages. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/029954; Nov. 24, 2011; 8 pages. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/024891; Nov. 25, 2011; 9 pages. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/031245; Dec. 26, 2011; 13 pages. |
Wireless Application Protocol—Wireless Transport Layer Security Specification, Version Feb. 18, 2000, Wireless Application Forum, Ltd. 2000; 99 pages. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/040864; Feb. 17, 2012; 8 pages. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/041565; Jan. 5, 2012; 7 pages. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/031246; Dec. 27, 2011; 8 pages. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/049000; Mar. 27, 2012; 10 pages. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/051877; Apr. 13, 2012; 7 pages. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/055101; May 22, 2012; 9 pages. |
Balamurugan Karpagavinayagam et al. (Monitoring Architecture for Lawful Interception in VoIP Networks, ICIMP 2007, Aug. 24, 2008. |
NiceLog User's Manual 385A0114-08 Rev. A2, Mar. 2004. |
WISPA: Wireless Internet Service Providers Association; WISPA-CS-IPNA-2.0; May 1, 2009. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/024870; Aug. 30, 2012; 7 pgs. |
RFC 5694 (“Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Architecture: Definition, Taxonomies, Examples, and Applicability”, Nov. 2009). |
Mahy et al., The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) “Replaces” Header, Sep. 2004, RFC 3891, pp. 1-16. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/024891; Aug. 30, 2012; 6 pgs. |
T. Dierks & E. Rescorla, The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol (Ver. 1.2, Aug. 2008) retrieved at http://tools.ietf.org/htmllrfc5246. Relevant pages provided. |
J. Rosenberg et al., SIP: Session Initiation Protocol (Jun. 2008) retrieved at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261. Relevant pages provided. |
Philippe Bazot et al., Developing SIP and IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) Applications (Feb. 5, 2007) retrieved at redbooks IBM form No. SG24-7255-00. Relevant pages provided. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/028685; Oct. 4, 2012; 6 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/031245; Oct. 26, 2012; 9 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/029954; Oct. 11, 2012; 5 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/031246; Nov. 8, 2012; 5 pgs. |
Rosenberg, J; “Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols”; Oct. 29, 2007; I ETF; I ETF draft of RFC 5245, draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-19; pp. 1-120. |
Blanchet et al; “IPv6 Tunnel Broker with the Tunnel Setup Protocol (TSP)”; May 6, 2008; IETF; IETF draft of RFC 5572, draftblanchet-v6ops-tunnelbroker-tsp-04; pp. 1-33. |
Cooper et al; “NAT Traversal for dSIP”; Feb. 25, 2007; IETF; IETF draft draft-matthews-p2psip-dsip-nat-traversal-00; pp. 1-23. |
Cooper et al; “The Effect of NATs on P2PSIP Overlay Architecture”; IETF; IETF draft draft-matthews-p2psip-nats-and-overlays-01.txt; pp. 1-20. |
Srisuresh et al; “State of Peer-to-Peer(P2P) Communication Across Network Address Translators(NATs)”; Nov. 19, 2007; I ETF; I ETF draft for RFC 5128, draft-ietf-behave-p2p-state-06.txt; pp. 1-33. |
PCT: International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/046026; Oct. 18, 2012; 6 pages. |
Dunigan, Tom, “Almost TCP over UDP (atou),” last modified Jan. 12, 2004; retrieved on Jan. 18, 2011 from <http://www.csm.oml.gov/˜dunigan/net100/atou.html> 18 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/040864; Jan. 3, 2013; 6 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/041565; Jan. 10, 2013; 6 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/049000; Feb. 26, 2013; 6 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/051877; Mar. 26, 2013; 5 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/055101; Apr. 16, 2013; 7 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2012/046026; Jan. 30, 2014; 5 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2008/075141; Mar. 9, 2010; 5 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2007/068820; Dec. 31, 2008; 8 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2007/068823; Nov. 27, 2008; 8 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2006/047841; Nov. 6, 2008; 7 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2007/002424; Aug. 7, 2008; 6 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2006/040312; May 2, 2008; 5 pgs. |
PCT: International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/IB2005/000821; Oct. 19, 2006; 10 pgs. |
Chathapuram, “Security in Peer-To-Peer Networks”, Aug. 8. 2001, XP002251813. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/IB2005/000821, dated Aug. 5, 2005. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US2006/032791, dated Dec. 18, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61846958 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15049891 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15297328 | US | |
Parent | 14690619 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 15049891 | US | |
Parent | 14024027 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 14690619 | US |