System and method for providing augmented reality challenges

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10614626
  • Patent Number
    10,614,626
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 14, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 7, 2020
    4 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • CPC
    • G06F17/30283
    • G06F17/30607
    • G06F17/30056
    • G06F17/30017
    • G06F17/30244
    • G06F17/30743
    • G06F16/40
    • G06F16/43
    • G06F16/48
    • G01C21/343
    • G01C21/3644
    • G01C21/3679
  • International Classifications
    • G06F16/00
    • G06T19/00
    • G06F16/43
    • G06F16/40
    • G06F16/48
    • Term Extension
      432
Abstract
A system and method for providing augmented reality challenges. The method includes obtaining at least one multimedia content element; causing generation of at least one signature for each obtained multimedia content element; determining, based on the generated signatures, at least one augmented reality challenge; identifying, based on the determined at least one augmented reality challenge, at least one augmented reality object; creating at least one challenge multimedia content element by causing addition of the at least one augmented reality object to the obtained at least one multimedia content element; and causing a display of the created at least one challenge multimedia content element.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to analysis of multimedia content, and more specifically to adding augmented reality objects to multimedia content based on analysis of the multimedia content.


BACKGROUND

The vast growth of content available over the Internet has led to a significant increase in the amount of time people spend interacting with computers. This can be especially common in children, who are more inclined to stay indoors to play electronic games than to go outside and participate and physical activities.


Research has shown that, during the 1970s and 1980s, children participated on average in over two hours of play outside each weekday and a further nine hours of play outside on weekends. Currently, the time children spend outside playing is estimated at no more than an hour each weekday, and less than 5 hours on weekends. The decrease in time spent performing physical activities for people generally and children in particular is concerning because physical activity is not only important for remaining active and healthy, but also for socializing.


Augmented reality (AR) technology typically presents real world information (e.g., an image of a real world environment) augmented by virtual information (e.g., images, text, sounds, etc.). Such real world information may include data from various sensors such as, but not limited to, accelerometers, GPS devices, compasses, gyroscopes, proximity sensors, cameras, and microphones.


Virtual objects are objects within a software application that can be displayed on a display of a computing device. In the context of digital gaming, virtual objects may be utilized to populate the virtual world created by an application. These virtual objects may include, but are not limited to, video game characters, trees, mountains, animals, fireworks, arrows, monsters, sports balls, and other environmental effects.


A common application of AR technology is for displaying real world imagery including live video or still images, and overlaying (i.e., superimposing) virtual objects on the real world imagery. To produce such AR imagery, a camera captures a video or still image of the real world, and a computing device superimposes one or more virtual objects over the captured video or still image.


AR images can be more entertaining when the virtual objects shown in the AR imagery convincingly appear to exist in the real world. However, in many cases, the depiction of interactions between virtual and real world objects in AR imagery is less than realistic. As a result, user engagement with the games or any other content may be decreased by the less than realistic depiction, thereby causing lower levels of user engagement.


AR games can be utilized to encourage physical activity. For example, augmented reality games may cause displays of characters based on location and movements of a user device. This location and movement-based character display may cause users to actively and physically move to different locations in order to interact with the characters.


It would therefore be advantageous to provide a solution that would overcome the deficiencies of the prior art.


SUMMARY

A summary of several example embodiments of the disclosure follows. This summary is provided for the convenience of the reader to provide a basic understanding of such embodiments and does not wholly define the breadth of the disclosure. This summary is not an extensive overview of all contemplated embodiments, and is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of all embodiments nor to delineate the scope of any or all aspects. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of one or more embodiments in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later. For convenience, the term “some embodiments” may be used herein to refer to a single embodiment or multiple embodiments of the disclosure.


The embodiments disclosed herein include a method for providing augmented reality challenges. The method comprises: obtaining at least one multimedia content element; causing generation of at least one signature for each obtained multimedia content element; determining, based on the generated signatures, at least one augmented reality challenge; identifying, based on the determined at least one augmented reality challenge, at least one augmented reality object; creating at least one challenge multimedia content element by causing addition of the at least one augmented reality object to the obtained at least one multimedia content element; and causing a display of the created at least one challenge multimedia content element.


The embodiments disclosed herein also include a non-transitory computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions for causing one or more processing units to execute a method, the method comprising: obtaining at least one multimedia content element; causing generation of at least one signature for each obtained multimedia content element; determining, based on the generated signatures, at least one augmented reality challenge; identifying, based on the determined at least one augmented reality challenge, at least one augmented reality object; creating at least one challenge multimedia content element by causing addition of the at least one augmented reality object to the obtained at least one multimedia content element; and causing a display of the created at least one challenge multimedia content element.


The embodiments disclosed herein also include a system for providing augmented reality challenges. The system comprises: a processing circuitry; and a memory, the memory containing instructions that, when executed by the processing circuitry, configure the system to: obtain at least one multimedia content element; cause generation of at least one signature for each obtained multimedia content element; determine, based on the generated signatures, at least one augmented reality challenge; identify, based on the determined at least one augmented reality challenge, at least one augmented reality object; create at least one challenge multimedia content element by causing addition of the at least one augmented reality object to the obtained at least one multimedia content element; and cause a display of the created at least one challenge multimedia content element.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The subject matter disclosed herein is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the disclosed embodiments will be apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a network diagram utilized to describe the various disclosed embodiments.



FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating providing challenges using augmented reality objects according to an embodiment.



FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method for determining whether a user met an augmented reality challenge according to an embodiment.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram depicting the basic flow of information in the signature generator system.



FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the flow of patches generation, response vector generation, and signature generation in a large-scale speech-to-text system.



FIG. 6 is an example block diagram of a user device configured to provide augmented reality challenges according to an embodiment.



FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating generating a customized augmented reality challenge according to an embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It is important to note that the embodiments disclosed herein are only examples of the many advantageous uses of the innovative teachings herein. In general, statements made in the specification of the present application do not necessarily limit any of the various claimed embodiments. Moreover, some statements may apply to some inventive features but not to others. In general, unless otherwise indicated, singular elements may be in plural and vice versa with no loss of generality. In the drawings, like numerals refer to like parts through several views.


The various disclosed embodiments include a method and system for providing augmented reality challenges. At least one multimedia content element is obtained. At least one signature is generated for each multimedia content element. At least one concept is identified based on the multimedia content elements, where each concept is a collection of signatures and metadata representing the concept. Based on the concepts and signatures, metadata is generated. At least one augmented reality challenge is determined based on the metadata. At least one augmented reality object is generated for each augmented reality challenge and added to the at least one multimedia content element as an overlay. In a further embodiment, sensor data is received from a user device on which the overlaid at least one multimedia content element was displayed, and the sensor data is analyzed to determine whether the at least one augmented reality challenge was completed.



FIG. 1 shows an example network diagram 100 utilized to describe the various disclosed embodiments. A network 110 is used to communicate between different parts of the system 100. The network 110 may be the Internet, the world-wide-web (WWW), a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a metro area network (MAN), and other networks capable of enabling communication between the elements of the system 100.


Further connected to the network 110 is a user device (UD) 120, a server 130, a signature generator system (SGS) 140, a database 150, and a deep content classification (DCC) system 160. The user device 120 may be, but is not limited to, a personal computer (PC), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile phone, a smart phone, a tablet computer, an electronic wearable device (e.g., glasses, a watch, etc.), or any other kinds of wired or mobile appliance, equipped with browsing, viewing, capturing, storing, listening, filtering, and managing capabilities enabled as further discussed herein below.


The user device 120 may further have a software application (App) 125 installed thereon. The application 125 may be downloaded from an application repository such as, e.g., AppStore®, Google Play®, or any other repository hosting software applications. The application 125 may be pre-installed in the user device 120. The application 125 may be a web browser. It should be noted that the embodiments described herein with respect to FIG. 1 are discussed with respect to one user device 120 and one application 125 merely for simplicity purposes and without limitation on the disclosed embodiments. The embodiments disclosed herein are equally applicable to multiple user devices, and each user device may be installed with one or more applications.


Also communicatively connected to the network 110 is the database 150. The database 150 may store information such as, but not limited to, multimedia content elements, metadata related to multimedia content elements, metadata associated with users and user devices, rules for determining challenges, rules for selecting augmented reality objects for challenges, rules for placing augmented reality objects for challenges (e.g., overlaying an augmented reality object on a multimedia content element showing a particular geographical location, overlaying an augmented reality object over a particular real world object, etc.), combinations thereof, and the like. As shown in FIG. 1, the server 130 may communicate with the database 150 through the network 110. In other non-limiting embodiments, the server 130 is directly connected to the database 150.


In an embodiment, the server 130 is configured to communicate with the SGS 140 and the DCC system 160 to perform the various disclosed embodiments. The SGS 140 and the DCC 160 may be connected to the server 130 directly, or may communicate with the server 130 over the network 110. In some configurations, the SGS 140, the DCC system 160, or both, may be integrated within the server 130.


The server 130 typically includes a processing circuitry 132 coupled to a memory 134. The memory 134 contains instructions that can be executed by the processing circuitry 132. The instructions, when executed by the processing circuitry 132, configure the server 130 to perform the various disclosed methods. The server 130 also typically includes a network interface (not shown) utilized for communicating with the network 110.


The processing circuitry 132 may comprise or be a component of a processor (not shown) or an array of processors. The one or more processors may be implemented with any combination of general-purpose microprocessors, multi-core processors, microcontrollers, digital signal processors (DSPs), field programmable gate array (FPGAs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), controllers, state machines, gated logic, discrete hardware components, dedicated hardware finite state machines, or any other suitable entities that can perform calculations or other manipulations of information.


The processing circuitry 120 may also include machine-readable media for storing software. Software shall be construed broadly to mean any type of instructions, whether referred to as software, firmware, middleware, microcode, hardware description language, or otherwise. Instructions may include code (e.g., in source code format, binary code format, executable code format, or any other suitable format of code). The instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the processing system to perform the various functions described herein.


In another embodiment, the processing circuitry 132 can be realized an array of computational cores having properties that are at least partly statistically independent from other cores of the plurality of computational cores. The array of computational cores configured as described further herein below.


The server 130 is configured to receive and utilize multimedia content elements. To this end, the server 130 may be configured to, but not limited to, identify metadata associated with the multimedia content element, save the received multimedia content elements and associated metadata in the database 150 or in the user device 120, generate augmented reality challenges based on metadata, generate augmented reality objects for challenges, and more. A multimedia content may be or may include, but is not limited to, an image, a graphic, a video stream, a video clip, an audio stream, an audio clip, a video frame, a photograph, and an image of signals (e.g., spectrograms, phasograms, scalograms, etc.), a combination thereof, and a portion thereof.


In an embodiment, the server 130 is configured to obtain at least one multimedia content element. The obtained at least one multimedia content element may be included in a request to provide a physical challenge based on the at least one multimedia content element. The server 130 is configured to send each identified multimedia content element to the SGS 140, the DCC system 160, or both. To which system(s) the multimedia content elements should be sent may be predetermined, or may be determined based on the results by returned by each system. For example, if the DCC 160 returns a concept based on the identified multimedia content element, there is no need to generate a signature for the element.


In another embodiment, the server 130 may be configured to, for the at least one multimedia content element, whether to provide an augmented reality challenge. In a further embodiment, the determination may be based on metadata associated with the at least one multimedia content element. As a non-limiting example, if metadata associated with the at least one multimedia content element indicates that the at least one multimedia content element was recently captured (e.g., within 2 minutes of the determination), the server 130 may determine that a challenge should be provided.


Each obtained multimedia content element is typically an image or video illustrating an area in the real world. It should be noted, however, that other types of multimedia contents, both now known and hereinafter developed, may be utilized for generating the customized augmented reality environment. Further, although the identified multimedia content elements may show the real world, the embodiments disclosed herein are not limited as such and may include superimposing characters on multimedia content representing, e.g., virtual reality or any otherwise artificial (i.e., not necessarily part of the real physical world) areas may be equally utilized without departing from the scope of the disclosure. For example, images from a virtual reality program may be analyzed and further enhanced by generating customized augmented reality environments based on the virtual reality images.


In an embodiment, the SGS 140 is configured to receive a multimedia content element and to generate at least one signature for each of the received at least one multimedia content element. The at least one signature can be generated using a plurality of computational cores, where each core of the plurality of computational cores is at least partially statistically independent of the other computational cores. In a further embodiment, each generated signature is robust to noise and distortion. The generation of signatures for multimedia content elements is described further herein below.


In an embodiment, based on the generated signatures, the server 130 is configured to determine at least one augmented reality challenge. The at least one augmented reality challenge may be stored in, e.g., the database 150. To this end, in an embodiment, the server 130 may be configured to query the database 150 using the generated signatures. In a further embodiment, each augmented reality challenge may be or may include a physical challenge, i.e., a challenge that requires the user of the user device 120 to perform some physical activity to be completed. The challenge may include, but is not limited to, providing a user gesture (e.g., swiping, sliding, tapping, or otherwise interacting with the user device), answering one or more questions, performing a physical task (e.g., running, jumping, walking, climbing, etc.), combinations thereof, and the like. In a further embodiment, the challenge may include condition requirements such as, but not limited to, moving to a particular geographical location or series of geographical locations, moving at least a particular distance, and the like.


In an embodiment, the server 130 is configured to generate at least one augmented reality object for each determined augmented reality challenge, and to add the generated at least one augmented reality object to the obtained at least one multimedia content element as an overlay. Each augmented reality object is a multimedia content element and may represent, but is not limited to, a character, a mark, an item (e.g., food, books, statues, buildings, plants, bodies of water, etc.), an animal, text, and the like.


As a non-limited example for providing an augmented reality challenge, an image of Times Square in Manhattan, N.Y., is captured by the user device 120. Metadata associated with the image indicates that it was taken 5 seconds ago. Based on the metadata, it is determined that an augmented reality challenge in Times Square should be provided. A signature is generated for the image of Times Square and the database 150 is queried, based on the generated signature. The query returns an augmented reality challenge indicating that the user must find a red flag augmented reality object near a pizzeria in Times Square. When the user device 120 captures an image including the pizzeria, the server 130 adds the red flag the image as an overlay and causes a display of the overlaid image on the user device 120.


In a further embodiment, the server 130 may be configured to generate customized augmented reality challenges for the user of the user device 120. In yet a further embodiment, the customized augmented reality challenge may be generated based on metadata (e.g., metadata stored in the database 150). To this end, in an embodiment, the server 130 is configured to identify metadata associated with the user device 120, the user of the user device 120, or both. The metadata may indicate, but is not limited to, personal variables associated with the user, environmental variables associated with the user device 120, or both. The personal variables may include, but are not limited to, previous challenges presented to the user, scores for previous challenges, an average speed of the user, age, demographic information, intelligence, physical limitations (e.g., handicaps, heart conditions, allergies, etc.), and the like. The environmental variables may include, but are not limited to, previous challenges determined based on similar multimedia content elements, a current location of the user device 120, previous locations of the user device 120, time, weather, and the like.


In yet a further embodiment, the metadata used for generating the customized augmented reality challenges may include metadata associated with the obtained at least one multimedia content element. The multimedia content element metadata may include, but is not limited to, a time of capture of a multimedia content element, a geographic location of capture of the multimedia content element, a user-added annotation, and the like.


As a non-limiting example for generating a customized augmented reality challenge, metadata associated with the user and with the user device 120 is identified. The metadata includes physical variables indicating that the user is age 12, that the user previously ran up a hill in 43 seconds, and that the user device 120 is at a geographic location of the hill. The metadata is analyzed. Based on the metadata, a challenge to run up the hill in less than 40 seconds is generated. The challenge includes text indicating the goal of the challenge, and is added to multimedia content elements showing the hill as an overlay.


In another embodiment, the signature for an obtained multimedia content element may be determined based on a concept structure. The signature for each received multimedia content element may be representative of at least one concept structure (hereinafter referred to as a “concept”). A concept is a collection of signatures representing elements of the unstructured data and metadata describing the concept. As a non-limiting example, a ‘Superman concept’ is a signature-reduced cluster of signatures describing elements (such as multimedia elements) related to, e.g., a Superman cartoon: a set of metadata representing proving textual representation of the Superman concept. Techniques for generating concept structures (or “concepts”) are also described in the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 8,266,185 (hereinafter '185) to Raichelgauz, et al., which is assigned to common assignee, and is incorporated hereby by reference for all that it contains.


According to this embodiment, the server 130 is configured to send, to the DCC system 160, a query for matching the multimedia content element to at least one concept structure. If a match is found, the metadata of the matching concept may be utilized to, e.g., generate the at least one customized augmented reality challenge. The matching may include, but is not limited to, matching at least one signature generated for the multimedia content element to a plurality of concept signatures, where each concept signature represents a concept. The signatures generated for the multimedia content element may be generated by, e.g., the SGS 140, the DCC system 160, and the like. The matching may be performed for all concepts maintained by the DCC system 160.


It should be noted that if multiple concepts are determined to match a multimedia content element, the server 130 may be configured to correlate among the matching concepts to generate a tag or other metadata that best describes the multimedia content element. The correlation may further be based on, but not limited to, a ratio between signatures' respective sizes, a spatial location of each signature, one or more probabilistic models, and the like.


In a further embodiment, a user response to the challenge may be subsequently received as sensor data from the user device 120. The sensor data may include, but is not limited to, interactions with a touch screen, images, videos, audio, GPS signals, magnetometer signals, gyroscope signals, accelerometer signals, light sensor signals, combinations thereof, and other sensor signals. Based on the sensor data, the server 130 may be configured to determine whether the user completed the challenge. As a non-limiting example, if the challenge is to walk up a hill, the received sensor data may include accelerometer signals. The accelerometer signals may be analyzed to determine that the user did walk up a hill and, therefore, completed the challenge.


In yet a further embodiment, the server 130 may be configured to analyze the sensor data and to generate, based on the analysis, a score indicating a level of performance of the user. In a further embodiment, the server 130 is configured to send the score to the user device 120. In another embodiment, the score may be sent for storage in, e.g., the database 150.


It should be noted that the signatures generated for the multimedia content elements enables accurate analysis of the elements, because the signatures generated according to the disclosed embodiments allow for recognition and classification of multimedia content.


It should also be noted that the SGS 140 is shown in FIG. 1 as a separate device from the server 130 and from the user device 120 merely for simplicity purposes and without limitation on the disclosed embodiments. The SGS 140 may be included in the server 130 or the user device 120 without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Inclusion of a signature generator in a user device is described further herein below with respect to FIG. 6.



FIG. 2 is an example flowchart 200 illustrating a method for providing augmented reality challenges according to an embodiment. In an embodiment, the method may be performed by a server (e.g., the server 130) based on multimedia content elements captured by a user device (e.g., the user device 120). In another embodiment, part or all of the method may be performed by an application (e.g., the application 125) installed on a user device.


At S210, at least one multimedia content element is obtained. The at least one multimedia content element may be captured by the user device, and may be, e.g., received from the user device, retrieved from a database (e.g., the database 150), and the like.


At optional S220, based on the obtained at least one multimedia content element, it may be determined whether a challenge should be provided and, if so, execution continues with S230; otherwise, execution terminates. In a further embodiment, S220 may include identifying metadata associated with the at least one multimedia content element and determining, based on the metadata, whether to provide the challenge. The determination of whether to provide the challenge may be further based on one or more predetermined challenge provision rules. As a non-limiting example, a challenge provision rule may indicate that a challenge should only be issued if the at least one multimedia content element was captured recently (e.g., within a predetermined threshold amount of time from a current time).


At S230, generation of at least one signature is caused for each obtained multimedia content element. In an embodiment, each signature may be generated by a signature generator (e.g., the SGS 140) as described further herein below with respect to FIGS. 4 and 5.


At optional S240, metadata may be identified. The metadata may be metadata stored in a database (e.g., the database 150), or in a storage of the user device. The metadata may be metadata associated with, but not limited to, the user, the user device, the obtained at least one multimedia content element, a combination thereof, and the like.


At S250, at least one augmented reality challenge is determined for the at least one multimedia content element. The at least one augmented reality challenge may be determined based on, but not limited to, the generated signatures, the identified metadata, a combination thereof, and the like. In an embodiment, S250 may further include generating at least one customized augmented reality challenge. Generating a customized augmented reality challenge is described further herein below with respect to FIG. 7.


At S260, at least one augmented reality object to be added to the at least one multimedia content element is identified. Each augmented reality object is a multimedia content element. The identified augmented reality objects may be associated with the determined challenge.


At S270, the identified at least one augmented reality object is added to the at least one multimedia content element as an overlay to create at least one challenge multimedia content element. In an embodiment, S270 further causing a display of the at least one challenge multimedia content element. In a further embodiment, S270 includes sending the overlaid at least one multimedia content element to the user device.


At S280, it is determined whether additional multimedia content elements have been obtained and, if so, execution continues with S210; otherwise, execution terminates.



FIG. 3 is an example flowchart 300 illustrating a method for determining whether an augmented reality challenge has been completed according to an embodiment. In an embodiment, the method may be performed by a server (e.g., the server 130), a user device (e.g., the user device 120), or partially performed on both a server and a user device. The augmented reality challenge may be an augmented reality challenge provided, for example, via at least one challenge multimedia content element as described herein above with respect to FIG. 2.


At S310, data associated with a user response to the augmented reality challenge is obtained. The user response data may include, but is not limited to, sensor data as described further herein above. The user response data represents a response by the user of the user device to the augmented reality challenge including, for example, answers to questions, user gestures made via the user device, physical actions (e.g., walking, running, climbing, relocating, etc.), combinations thereof, and the like.


At S320, at least one challenge threshold is determined. The challenge thresholds represent requirements for completing the challenges and may include, but are not limited to, a distance traveled, a set of required actions, a new geographical location, and the like. In an embodiment, S320 includes retrieving the at least one challenge threshold from a database (e.g., the database 150). Each challenge threshold may be determined based on, e.g., the augmented reality challenge. For example, the database may include a set of augmented reality challenges and corresponding challenge thresholds.


At S330, it is determined whether the at least one challenge threshold was met and, if so, execution continues with S360; otherwise, execution continues with S340.


At optional S340, a notification indicating that the challenge was not completed may be generated and sent (e.g., to the user device), and execution continues with S350. In an embodiment, the notification may be generated and sent only if the at least one challenge threshold was not met a predetermined number of times. For example, a notification indicating that the challenge was not completed may only be generated and sent after the third time user response data was received that did not meet the at least one challenge threshold.


At S350, it is checked whether additional user response data has been received and, if so, execution continues with S310; otherwise, execution terminates. Checking for additional user response data allows the user additional opportunities (e.g., the predetermined number of times) to complete the challenge before a failure to complete notification is sent.


At S360, a notification indicating that the challenge has been completed is generated and sent (e.g., to the user device). In an embodiment, S360 further includes determining a user performance score based on the user response data. In a further embodiment, the user performance score may be determined further based on user performance data of other users stored in a database (e.g., the database 150).



FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate the generation of signatures for the multimedia content elements by the SGS 140 according to one embodiment. An exemplary high-level description of the process for large scale matching is depicted in FIG. 4. In this example, the matching is for a video content.


Video content segments 2 from a Master database (DB) 6 and a Target DB 1 are processed in parallel by a large number of independent computational Cores 3 that constitute an architecture for generating the Signatures (hereinafter the “Architecture”). Further details on the computational Cores generation are provided below. The independent Cores 3 generate a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 4 for Target content-segments 5 and a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 7 for Master content-segments 8. An exemplary and non-limiting process of signature generation for an audio component is shown in detail in FIG. 4. Finally, Target Robust Signatures and/or Signatures are effectively matched, by a matching algorithm 9, to Master Robust Signatures and/or Signatures database to find all matches between the two databases.


To demonstrate an example of the signature generation process, it is assumed, merely for the sake of simplicity and without limitation on the generality of the disclosed embodiments, that the signatures are based on a single frame, leading to certain simplification of the computational cores generation. The Matching System is extensible for signatures generation capturing the dynamics in-between the frames. In an embodiment the server 130 is configured with a plurality of computational cores to perform matching between signatures.


The Signatures' generation process is now described with reference to FIG. 5. The first step in the process of signatures generation from a given speech-segment is to breakdown the speech-segment to K patches 14 of random length P and random position within the speech segment 12. The breakdown is performed by the patch generator component 21. The value of the number of patches K, random length P and random position parameters is determined based on optimization, considering the tradeoff between accuracy rate and the number of fast matches required in the flow process of the server 130 and SGS 140. Thereafter, all the K patches are injected in parallel into all computational Cores 3 to generate K response vectors 22, which are fed into a signature generator system 23 to produce a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 4.


In order to generate Robust Signatures, i.e., Signatures that are robust to additive noise L (where L is an integer equal to or greater than 1) by the Computational Cores 3 a frame “i” is injected into all the Cores 3. Then, Cores 3 generate two binary response vectors: {right arrow over (S)} which is a Signature vector, and {right arrow over (RS)} which is a Robust Signature vector.


For generation of signatures robust to additive noise, such as White-Gaussian-Noise, scratch, etc., but not robust to distortions, such as crop, shift and rotation, etc., a core Ci={ni} (1≤i≤L) may consist of a single leaky integrate-to-threshold unit (LTU) node or more nodes. The node ni equations are:







V
i





j







w
ij



k
j










n
i

=

θ


(

Vi
-

Th
x


)






where, θ is a Heaviside step function; wiij is a coupling node unit (CNU) between node i and image component j (for example, grayscale value of a certain pixel j); kj is an image component ‘j’ (for example, grayscale value of a certain pixel j); Thx is a constant Threshold value, where ‘x’ is ‘S’ for Signature and ‘RS’ for Robust Signature; and Vi is a Coupling Node Value.


The Threshold values Thx are set differently for Signature generation and for Robust Signature generation. For example, for a certain distribution of Vi values (for the set of nodes), the thresholds for Signature (ThS) and Robust Signature (ThRS) are set apart, after optimization, according to at least one or more of the following criteria.

    • 1: For: Vi>ThRS
      1−p(V>ThS)−1−(1−ε)l«1

      i.e., given that l nodes (cores) constitute a Robust Signature of a certain image I, the probability that not all of these I nodes will belong to the Signature of same, but noisy image, Ĩ is sufficiently low (according to a system's specified accuracy).
    • 2:p(Vi>ThRS)≈l/L


      i.e., approximately l out of the total L nodes can be found to generate a Robust Signature according to the above definition.
    • 3: Both Robust Signature and Signature are generated for certain frame i.


In order to generate signatures robust to additive noises, such as White-Gaussian-Noise, scratch, etc., and robust to distortions, such as crop, shift and rotation, etc., the core Ci should consist of a group of nodes (LTUs): Ci={nim }, where m is the number of nodes in each core I, generated according to certain statistical processes, modeling variants of certain set of distortions.


The first step in generation of distortions-invariant signatures is to generate m Signatures and Robust Signatures, based on each of the m nodes in all the L cores, according to the previously described (above) algorithm. The next step is to determine a subset V of m potential signatures-variants for certain frame i. This is done by defining a certain consistent and robust selection criterion, for example, select top f signature-variants out of m, with highest firing-rate across all L computational cores. The reduced set will be used as Signature and Robust Signature, invariant to distortions which were defined and used in the process of computational cores generation.


It should be understood that the generation of a signature is unidirectional, and typically yields lossless compression, where the characteristics of the compressed data are maintained but the uncompressed data cannot be reconstructed. Therefore, a signature can be used for the purpose of comparison to another signature without the need of comparison to the original data. The detailed description of the Signature generation can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,326,775 and 8,312,031, assigned to common assignee, which are hereby incorporated by reference for all the useful information they contain.


A Computational Core generation is a process of definition, selection, and tuning of the parameters of the cores for a certain realization in a specific system and application. The process is based on several design considerations, such as:

    • (a) The Cores should be designed so as to obtain maximal independence, i.e., the projection from a signal space should generate a maximal pair-wise distance between any two cores' projections into a high-dimensional space.
    • (b) The Cores should be optimally designed for the type of signals, i.e., the Cores should be maximally sensitive to the spatio-temporal structure of the injected signal, for example, and in particular, sensitive to local correlations in time and space. Thus, in some cases a core represents a dynamic system, such as in state space, phase space, edge of chaos, etc., which is uniquely used herein to exploit their maximal computational power.
    • (c) The Cores should be optimally designed with regard to invariance to a set of signal distortions, of interest in relevant applications.


A detailed description of the Computational Core generation and the process for configuring such cores is discussed in more detail in the above-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 8,655,801.



FIG. 6 is an example block diagram of a user device 120 configured to generate and display a customized augmented reality environment according to an embodiment. The user device 120 includes a processing circuity 610 coupled to a memory 615. The memory contains instructions that, when executed by the processing circuity 610, configures the user device 120 to generate and display the augment reality environment and challenges of other applications (e.g., the app 125, FIG. 1) installed in the user device 120. The user device 120 may further include an augmented reality (AR) generator 620, a local storage 630, a display 640, and a signature generator (SG) 650.


The signature generator 650 may be configured to generate signatures for multimedia content elements. In a further embodiment, the signature generator 610 includes a plurality of computational cores as discussed further herein above, where each computational core is at least partially statistically independent of the other computational cores.


The data storage 630 may store a plurality of multimedia content elements, a plurality of concepts, signatures for the multimedia content elements, signatures for the concepts, or a combination thereof. In a further embodiment, the data storage 630 may include a limited set of concepts relative to a larger set of known concepts. Such a limited set of concepts may be utilized when, for example, the data storage 630 is included in a device having a relatively low storage capacity such as, e.g., a smartphone or other mobile device, or otherwise when lower memory use is desirable.


The AR generator 620 is configured to receive or otherwise retrieve a multimedia content element from the local storage. The AR generator 620 is further configured to initialize the signatures generator (SG) 650 to generate at least one signature for the received the multimedia content element. The AR generator 620 is configured to match the generated signatures against the concepts stored in the storage 630. Matching concepts are utilized to generate the customized augmented reality environment as discussed in greater detail above with respect to FIG. 1. Once generated, the customized augmented reality environment is displayed over the display 640.


The AR generator 620 and the processing circuity 610 can be implemented as a component of a processor (not shown) or an array of processors, examples of which are provided above.



FIG. 7 is an example flowchart S250 illustrating a method for generating a customized augmented reality challenge according to an embodiment. In an embodiment, the method may utilize identified metadata stored in, e.g., a storage of a user device, a database, or both.


At optional S710, metadata related to a user of a user device, to the user device, or to both, is obtained. The metadata may be stored in a storage of the user device or in an external storage (e.g., a database). The metadata may include, but is not limited to, personal variables associated with the user, environmental variables associated with the user device, or both. The metadata may further include metadata associated with one or more multimedia content elements.


At S720, metadata related to a user of a user device, to the user device, to a multimedia content element, or a combination thereof, is analyzed. The analysis may include, but is not limited to, determining an age of the user, determining a current location of the user device, determining past challenge performance of the user, a combination thereof, and the like.


At S730, based on the analysis, at least one augmented reality challenge threshold is determined. Each augmented reality challenge threshold represents a requirement for completing the customized augmented reality challenge, and may be based on, e.g., user response data. For example, an augmented challenge reality threshold may be a distance of 300 feet as determined based on GPS data received as a response to the augmented reality challenge.


Each augmented reality challenge threshold may be determined based on at least one threshold selection criterion. Further, the threshold selection criteria used to determine the augmented reality challenge thresholds may differ among users and user devices. The threshold selection criterion may be, e.g., stored in a database, and may be based on, but not limited to, the age of the user, the current location of the user device, past challenge performance of the user, any relevant health conditions, a combination thereof, and the like. For example, the threshold selection criteria may indicate that a challenge threshold for a running challenge should be to run 100 feet in 20 seconds for an 8 year old user, and to run 100 feet in 15 seconds for a 12 year old user.


At S740, the customized augmented reality challenge is generated based on the determined challenge thresholds. In a further embodiment, S740 may also include generating a notification indicating the challenge thresholds and sending, to a user device, the generated notification for display. In yet a further embodiment, S740 may include causing addition of the generated notification as an overlay of a multimedia content element.


As used herein, the phrase “at least one of” followed by a listing of items means that any of the listed items can be utilized individually, or any combination of two or more of the listed items can be utilized. For example, if a step in a method is described as including “at least one of A, B, and C,” the step can include A alone; B alone; C alone; A and B in combination; B and C in combination; A and C in combination; or A, B, and C in combination.


The various embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented as hardware, firmware, software, or any combination thereof. Moreover, the software is preferably implemented as an application program tangibly embodied on a program storage unit or computer readable medium consisting of parts, or of certain devices and/or a combination of devices. The application program may be uploaded to, and executed by, a machine comprising any suitable architecture. Preferably, the machine is implemented on a computer platform having hardware such as one or more central processing units (“CPUs”), a memory, and input/output interfaces. The computer platform may also include an operating system and microinstruction code. The various processes and functions described herein may be either part of the microinstruction code or part of the application program, or any combination thereof, which may be executed by a CPU, whether or not such a computer or processor is explicitly shown. In addition, various other peripheral units may be connected to the computer platform such as an additional data storage unit and a printing unit. Furthermore, a non-transitory computer readable medium is any computer readable medium except for a transitory propagating signal.


All examples and conditional language recited herein are intended for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the disclosed embodiment and the concepts contributed by the inventor to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the disclosed embodiments, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in the future, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure.

Claims
  • 1. A method for automatically providing augmented reality challenges, comprising: capturing by a camera at least one multimedia content element;generating at least one signature for each obtained multimedia content element;determining, based on the at least one signature generated for each obtained multimedia content element, at least one augmented reality challenge;identifying, based on the determined at least one augmented reality challenge, at least one augmented reality object;creating at least one challenge multimedia content element by causing addition of the at least one augmented reality object to the obtained at least one multimedia content element;causing a display, on a display of the user device, of the created at least one challenge multimedia content element;sensing, by at least one sensor of the user device, a user response to the at least one augmented reality challenge; anddetermining, based on at least the user response, whether the user completed the at least one challenge.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: identifying metadata associated with at least one of: a user of a user device, the user device and the obtained at least one multimedia content element, wherein the at least one augmented reality challenge is determined further based on the identified metadata.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising: determining, based on the identified metadata, whether the augmented reality challenge should be provided.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining, based on the determined at least one augmented reality challenge, at least one challenge threshold; wherein the determining whether the user completed the at least one challenge is responsive to the at least one challenge threshold; and generating a notification indicating that the at least one augmented reality challenge was completed, when it is determined that the user completed the at least one challenge.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising: determining, based on the sensed user response, a user performance score.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: generating at least one customized augmented reality challenge, wherein the determined at least one augmented reality challenge includes the at least one customized augmented reality challenge.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein generating the at least one customized augmented reality challenge further comprises: analyzing metadata associated with at least one of: a user of a user device, the user device, and the obtained at least one multimedia content element; and determining, based on the analysis, at least one augmented reality challenge threshold, wherein the at least one customized augmented reality challenge is generated based on the at least one augmented reality challenge threshold.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the at least one augmented reality challenge is determined further based on at least one threshold selection criterion.
  • 9. The method according to claim 1 wherein the at least one augmented reality challenge requires a user of the user device to perform a physical activity to be completed; wherein the physical activity to be completed is a physical task selected out of running, jumping, walking and climbing.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1 wherein the determining of the at least one augmented reality challenge comprises: storing in the memory only a limited set of concepts relative to a larger set of known concepts;matching the at least one signature generated signatures that were generated for each obtained multimedia content element to the limited set of concepts to find at least one matching concept; andutilizing metadata of the at least one matching concept to determine the at least one augmented reality challange.
  • 11. The method according to claim 1 wherein the gerenating of the at least one signature for each obtained multimedia content element is executed by a plurality of computational cores of a signature generator; wherein each computational core of the plurality of computational cores having properties that are at least partly statistically independent of other of the plurality of computational cores.
  • 12. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for causing one or more processing units to execute a method, the method comprising: capturing by a camera at least one multimedia content element;generating at least one signature for each obtained multimedia content element;determining, based on the at least one signature generated for each obtained multimedia content element, at least one augmented reality challenge;identifying, based on the determined at least one augmented reality challenge, at least one augmented reality object;creating at least one challenge multimedia content element by causing addition of the at least one augmented reality object to the obtained at least one multimedia content element;causing a display, on a display of the user device, of the created at least one challenge multimedia content element;sensing, by at least one sensor of the user device, a user response to the at least one augmented reality challenge; anddetermining, based on at least the user response, whether the user completed the at least one challenge.
  • 13. A system for automatically providing augmented reality challenges, comprising: a camera, at least one sensor, a display, a processing circuitry, and a memory, the memory containing instructions that, when executed by the processing circuitry, configure the system to:capture, by the camera, at least one multimedia content element;generate, at least one signature for each obtained multimedia content element;determine, based on the at least one signature generated for each obtained multimedia content element, at least one augmented reality challenge;identify, based on the determined at least one augmented reality challenge, at least one augmented reality object;create at least one challenge multimedia content element by causing addition of the at least one augmented reality object to the obtained at least one multimedia content element;cause a display, on the display, of the created at least one challenge multimedia content element;sense, by the at least one sensor, a user response to the at least one augmented reality challenge; anddetermine, based on at least the user response, whether the user completed the at least one challenge.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the system is further configured to: identify metadata associated with at least one of: a user of a user device, the user device and the obtained at least one multimedia content element, wherein the at least one augmented reality challenge is determined further based on the identified metadata.
  • 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the system is further configured to: determine, based on the identified metadata, whether the augmented reality challenge should be provided.
  • 16. The system of claim 13, wherein the system is further configured to: determine, based on the determined at least one augmented reality challenge, at least one challenge threshold; wherein a determining of whether the user completed the at least one challenge is responsive to the at least one challenge threshold; andgenerate a notification indicating that the at least one augmented reality challenge was completed, when it is determined that the user completed the at least one challenge.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the system is further configured to: determine, based on the sensed user response, a user performance score.
  • 18. The system of claim 13, wherein the system is further configured to: generate at least one customized augmented reality challenge, wherein the determined at least one augmented reality challenge includes the at least one customized augmented reality challenge.
  • 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the system is further configured to: analyze metadata associated with at least one of: a user of a user device, the user device, and the obtained at least one multimedia content element; and determine, based on the analysis, at least one augmented reality challenge threshold, wherein the at least one customized augmented reality challenge is generated based on the at least one augmented reality challenge threshold.
  • 20. The system of claim 18, wherein the at least one augmented reality challenge is determined further based on at least one threshold selection criterion.
Priority Claims (3)
Number Date Country Kind
171577 Oct 2005 IL national
173409 Jan 2006 IL national
185414 Aug 2007 IL national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/371,862 filed on Aug. 8, 2016. This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/050,991 filed on Oct. 10, 2013, now pending, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/860,261 filed on Jul. 31, 2013. The Ser. No. 14/050,991 Application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/602,858 filed on Sep. 4, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,868,619, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/603,123 filed on Oct. 21, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,266,185. The Ser. No. 12/603,123 Application is a continuation-in-part of: (1) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/084,150 having a filing date of Apr. 7, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,655,801, which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IL2006/001235 filed on Oct. 26, 2006, which claims foreign priority from Israeli Application No. 171577 filed on Oct. 26, 2005, and Israeli Application No. 173409 filed on Jan. 29, 2006;(2) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/195,863 filed on Aug. 21, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,775, which claims priority under 35 USC 119 from Israeli Application No. 185414 filed on Aug. 21, 2007, and which is also a continuation-in-part of the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/084,150;(3) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/348,888 filed on Jan. 5, 2009, now pending, which is a continuation-in-part of the above-mentioned U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/084,150 and 12/195,863; and(4) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/538,495 filed on Aug. 10, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,312,031, which is a continuation-in-part of the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/084,150, 12/195,863, and 12/348,888. All of the applications referenced above are herein incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (436)
Number Name Date Kind
4733353 Jaswa Mar 1988 A
4932645 Schorey et al. Jun 1990 A
4972363 Nguyen et al. Nov 1990 A
5214746 Fogel et al. May 1993 A
5307451 Clark Apr 1994 A
5412564 Ecer May 1995 A
5436653 Ellis et al. Jul 1995 A
5568181 Greenwood et al. Oct 1996 A
5638425 Meador et al. Jun 1997 A
5745678 Herzberg Apr 1998 A
5763069 Jordan Jun 1998 A
5806061 Chaudhuri et al. Sep 1998 A
5850352 Moezzi Dec 1998 A
5852435 Vigneaux et al. Dec 1998 A
5870754 Dimitrova et al. Feb 1999 A
5873080 Coden et al. Feb 1999 A
5887193 Takahashi et al. Mar 1999 A
5940821 Wical Aug 1999 A
5978754 Kumano Nov 1999 A
5987454 Hobbs Nov 1999 A
5991306 Burns et al. Nov 1999 A
6038560 Wical Mar 2000 A
6052481 Grajski et al. Apr 2000 A
6070167 Qian et al. May 2000 A
6076088 Paik et al. Jun 2000 A
6122628 Castelli et al. Sep 2000 A
6128651 Cezar Oct 2000 A
6137911 Zhilyaev Oct 2000 A
6144767 Bottou et al. Nov 2000 A
6147636 Gershenson Nov 2000 A
6240423 Hirata May 2001 B1
6243375 Speicher Jun 2001 B1
6243713 Nelson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6275599 Adler et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282548 Burner Aug 2001 B1
6329986 Cheng Dec 2001 B1
6363373 Steinkraus Mar 2002 B1
6381656 Shankman Apr 2002 B1
6411229 Kobayashi Jun 2002 B2
6422617 Fukumoto et al. Jul 2002 B1
6493692 Kobayashi et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493705 Kobayashi et al. Dec 2002 B1
6507672 Watkins et al. Jan 2003 B1
6523022 Hobbs Feb 2003 B1
6523046 Liu et al. Feb 2003 B2
6524861 Anderson Feb 2003 B1
6526400 Takata et al. Feb 2003 B1
6550018 Abonamah et al. Apr 2003 B1
6557042 He Apr 2003 B1
6560597 Dhillon et al. May 2003 B1
6594699 Sahai et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601026 Appelt et al. Jul 2003 B2
6601060 Tomaru Jul 2003 B1
6611628 Sekiguchi et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611837 Schreiber Aug 2003 B2
6618711 Ananth Sep 2003 B1
6643620 Contolini et al. Nov 2003 B1
6643643 Lee et al. Nov 2003 B1
6665657 Dibachi Dec 2003 B1
6675159 Lin et al. Jan 2004 B1
6681032 Bortolussi et al. Jan 2004 B2
6686970 Windle Feb 2004 B1
6704725 Lee Mar 2004 B1
6728706 Aggarwal et al. Apr 2004 B2
6732149 Kephart May 2004 B1
6738075 Torres May 2004 B1
6742094 Igari May 2004 B2
6751363 Natsev et al. Jun 2004 B1
6751613 Lee et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754435 Kim Jun 2004 B2
6763069 Divakaran et al. Jul 2004 B1
6763519 McColl et al. Jul 2004 B1
6774917 Foote et al. Aug 2004 B1
6795818 Lee Sep 2004 B1
6804356 Krishnamachari Oct 2004 B1
6813395 Kinjo Nov 2004 B1
6819797 Smith et al. Nov 2004 B1
6836776 Schreiber Dec 2004 B2
6845374 Oliver et al. Jan 2005 B1
6901207 Watkins May 2005 B1
6938025 Lulich et al. Aug 2005 B1
6970881 Mohan et al. Nov 2005 B1
6978264 Chandrasekar et al. Dec 2005 B2
6985172 Rigney et al. Jan 2006 B1
7006689 Kasutani Feb 2006 B2
7013051 Sekiguchi et al. Mar 2006 B2
7020654 Najmi Mar 2006 B1
7043473 Rassool et al. May 2006 B1
7124149 Smith et al. Oct 2006 B2
7158681 Persiantsev Jan 2007 B2
7199798 Echigo et al. Apr 2007 B1
7215828 Luo May 2007 B2
7260564 Lynn et al. Aug 2007 B1
7277928 Lennon Oct 2007 B2
7296012 Ohashi Nov 2007 B2
7299261 Oliver et al. Nov 2007 B1
7302117 Sekiguchi et al. Nov 2007 B2
7313805 Rosin et al. Dec 2007 B1
7340358 Yoneyama Mar 2008 B2
7346629 Kapur et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353224 Chen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376672 Weare May 2008 B2
7392238 Zhou et al. Jun 2008 B1
7406459 Chen et al. Jul 2008 B2
7433895 Li et al. Oct 2008 B2
7441037 Saxena Oct 2008 B2
7450740 Shah et al. Nov 2008 B2
7464086 Black et al. Dec 2008 B2
7523102 Bjarnestam et al. Apr 2009 B2
7526607 Singh et al. Apr 2009 B1
7529659 Wold May 2009 B2
7536384 Venkataraman et al. May 2009 B2
7542969 Rappaport et al. Jun 2009 B1
7548910 Chu et al. Jun 2009 B1
7555477 Bayley et al. Jun 2009 B2
7555478 Bayley et al. Jun 2009 B2
7562076 Kapur Jul 2009 B2
7574436 Kapur et al. Aug 2009 B2
7574668 Nunez et al. Aug 2009 B2
7577656 Kawai et al. Aug 2009 B2
7581166 Renger et al. Aug 2009 B2
7657100 Gokturk et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660468 Gokturk et al. Feb 2010 B2
7694318 Eldering et al. Apr 2010 B2
7836054 Kawai et al. Nov 2010 B2
7920894 Wyler Apr 2011 B2
7921107 Chang et al. Apr 2011 B2
7933407 Keidar et al. Apr 2011 B2
7974994 Li et al. Jul 2011 B2
7987194 Walker et al. Jul 2011 B1
7987217 Long et al. Jul 2011 B2
7991715 Schiff et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000655 Wang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8036893 Reich Oct 2011 B2
8098934 Vincent et al. Jan 2012 B2
8112376 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2012 B2
8266185 Raichelgauz et al. Sep 2012 B2
8312031 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2012 B2
8315442 Gokturk et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316005 Moore Nov 2012 B2
8326775 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2012 B2
8345982 Gokturk et al. Jan 2013 B2
8352745 McKeeth Jan 2013 B2
8457827 Ferguson et al. Jun 2013 B1
8495489 Everingham Jul 2013 B1
8548828 Longmire Oct 2013 B1
8655801 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2014 B2
8655878 Kulkarni et al. Feb 2014 B1
8677377 Cheyer et al. Mar 2014 B2
8682667 Haughay Mar 2014 B2
8688446 Yanagihara Apr 2014 B2
8706503 Cheyer et al. Apr 2014 B2
8775442 Moore et al. Jul 2014 B2
8799195 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8799196 Raichelquaz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8818916 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8868619 Raichelgauz et al. Oct 2014 B2
8868861 Shimizu et al. Oct 2014 B2
8880539 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2014 B2
8880566 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2014 B2
8886648 Procopio et al. Nov 2014 B1
8898568 Bull et al. Nov 2014 B2
8922414 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2014 B2
8959037 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2015 B2
8990125 Raichelgauz et al. Mar 2015 B2
9009086 Raichelgauz et al. Apr 2015 B2
9031999 Raichelgauz et al. May 2015 B2
9087049 Raichelgauz et al. Jul 2015 B2
9104747 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2015 B2
9165406 Gray et al. Oct 2015 B1
9191626 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2015 B2
9197244 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2015 B2
9218606 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2015 B2
9235557 Raichelgauz et al. Jan 2016 B2
9256668 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2016 B2
9323754 Ramanathan et al. Apr 2016 B2
9330189 Raichelgauz et al. May 2016 B2
9438270 Raichelgauz et al. Sep 2016 B2
9466068 Raichelgauz et al. Oct 2016 B2
9646006 Raichelgauz et al. May 2017 B2
9679062 Schillings et al. Jun 2017 B2
9807442 Bhatia et al. Oct 2017 B2
9984369 Li et al. May 2018 B2
20010019633 Tenze et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010038876 Anderson Nov 2001 A1
20010056427 Yoon et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020010682 Johnson Jan 2002 A1
20020010715 Chinn et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019881 Bokhari et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020032677 Morgenthaler et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038299 Zernik et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020059580 Kalker et al. May 2002 A1
20020072935 Rowse et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087530 Smith et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099695 Abajian Jul 2002 A1
20020099870 Miller et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107827 Benitez-Jimenez et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123928 Eldering et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020126872 Brunk et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129140 Peled et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129296 Kwiat et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143976 Barker et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147637 Kraft et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152267 Lennon Oct 2002 A1
20020157116 Jasinschi Oct 2002 A1
20020159640 Vaithilingam et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161739 Oh Oct 2002 A1
20020163532 Thomas et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020174095 Lulich et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178410 Haitsma et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030028660 Igawa et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030041047 Chang et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030050815 Seigel et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030078766 Appelt et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030086627 Berriss et al. May 2003 A1
20030089216 Birmingham et al. May 2003 A1
20030093790 Logan et al. May 2003 A1
20030105739 Essafi et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030126147 Essafi et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030182567 Barton et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030191764 Richards Oct 2003 A1
20030200217 Ackerman Oct 2003 A1
20030217335 Chung et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030229531 Heckerman et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003394 Ramaswamy Jan 2004 A1
20040025180 Begeja et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040068510 Hayes et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040107181 Rodden Jun 2004 A1
20040111432 Adams et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111465 Chuang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117367 Smith et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117638 Monroe Jun 2004 A1
20040128142 Whitham Jul 2004 A1
20040128511 Sun et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133927 Sternberg et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143602 Ruiz Jul 2004 A1
20040153426 Nugent Aug 2004 A1
20040215663 Liu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249779 Nauck et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260688 Gross Dec 2004 A1
20040267774 Lin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021394 Miedema et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050114198 Koningstein et al. May 2005 A1
20050131884 Gross et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144455 Haitsma Jun 2005 A1
20050172130 Roberts Aug 2005 A1
20050177372 Wang et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050238198 Brown et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050238238 Xu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245241 Durand et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050249398 Khamene et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256820 Dugan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050262428 Little et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050281439 Lange Dec 2005 A1
20050289163 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289590 Cheok et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004745 Kuhn et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060013451 Haitsma Jan 2006 A1
20060020860 Tardif et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020958 Allamanche et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026203 Tan et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060031216 Semple et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060033163 Chen Feb 2006 A1
20060041596 Stirbu et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060048191 Xiong Mar 2006 A1
20060064037 Shalon et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060112035 Cecchi et al. May 2006 A1
20060129822 Snijder et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143674 Jones et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060153296 Deng Jul 2006 A1
20060159442 Kim et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173688 Whitham Aug 2006 A1
20060184638 Chua et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060204035 Guo et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060217818 Fujiwara Sep 2006 A1
20060217828 Hicken Sep 2006 A1
20060224529 Kermani Oct 2006 A1
20060236343 Chang Oct 2006 A1
20060242139 Butterfield et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242554 Gerace et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060247983 Dalli Nov 2006 A1
20060248558 Barton et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253423 McLane et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060288002 Epstein et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070009159 Fan Jan 2007 A1
20070011151 Hagar et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019864 Koyama et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070022374 Huang et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027844 Toub et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070033163 Epstein et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038608 Chen Feb 2007 A1
20070038614 Guha Feb 2007 A1
20070042757 Jung et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070061302 Ramer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067304 Ives Mar 2007 A1
20070067682 Fang Mar 2007 A1
20070071330 Oostveen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070074147 Wold Mar 2007 A1
20070083611 Farago et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070091106 Moroney Apr 2007 A1
20070130112 Lin Jun 2007 A1
20070130159 Gulli et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156720 Maren Jul 2007 A1
20070168413 Barletta et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174320 Chou Jul 2007 A1
20070195987 Rhoads Aug 2007 A1
20070220573 Chiussi et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070244902 Seide et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070253594 Lu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255785 Hayashi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070268309 Tanigawa et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282826 Hoeber et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070294295 Finkelstein et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070298152 Baets Dec 2007 A1
20080046406 Seide et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049629 Morrill Feb 2008 A1
20080049789 Vedantham et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080072256 Boicey et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080091527 Silverbrook et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080152231 Gokturk et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159622 Agnihotri et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080163288 Ghosal et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080165861 Wen et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172413 Chiu Jul 2008 A1
20080172615 Igelman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201299 Lehikoinen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201314 Smith et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201361 Castro et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080204706 Magne et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228995 Tan et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080237359 Silverbrook et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080253737 Kimura et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263579 Mears et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270373 Oostveen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080307454 Ahanger et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080313140 Pereira et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080313146 Wong et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090013414 Washington et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090022472 Bronstein et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024641 Quigley et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037408 Rodgers Feb 2009 A1
20090043637 Eder Feb 2009 A1
20090089587 Brunk et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119157 Dulepet May 2009 A1
20090125544 Brindley May 2009 A1
20090148045 Lee et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090157575 Schobben et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090172030 Schiff et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090175538 Bronstein et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090216761 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090245573 Saptharishi et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090245603 Koruga et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090253583 Yoganathan Oct 2009 A1
20090254572 Redlich et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090277322 Cai et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090282218 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100042646 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100082684 Churchill et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100104184 Bronstein et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100125569 Nair et al. May 2010 A1
20100162405 Cook et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100173269 Puri et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100198626 Cho et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100211565 Lotito Aug 2010 A1
20100268524 Nath et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100284604 Chrysanthakopoulos Nov 2010 A1
20100306193 Pereira et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318493 Wessling Dec 2010 A1
20100322522 Wang et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325138 Lee et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325581 Finkelstein et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110052063 McAuley et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110055585 Lee Mar 2011 A1
20110145068 King et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110164180 Lee Jul 2011 A1
20110164810 Zang et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110202848 Ismalon Aug 2011 A1
20110246566 Kashef et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110251896 Impollonia et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110276680 Rimon Nov 2011 A1
20110296315 Lin et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110313856 Cohen et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120082362 Diem et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120131454 Shah May 2012 A1
20120150890 Jeong et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120167133 Carroll et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120179642 Sweeney et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120185445 Borden et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120197857 Huang et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221470 Lyon Aug 2012 A1
20120227074 Hill et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120239690 Asikainen et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120239694 Avner et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120299961 Ramkumar et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120301105 Rehg et al. Nov 2012 A1
20090220138 Zhang et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120315009 Evans et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120330869 Durham Dec 2012 A1
20120331011 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130031489 Gubin et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130066856 Ong et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130067035 Amanat et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130067364 Berntson et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130086499 Dyor et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130089248 Remiszewski et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130104251 Moore et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130159298 Mason et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130173635 Sanjeev Jul 2013 A1
20130226930 Arngren et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130283401 Pabla et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130325550 Varghese et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130332951 Gharaat et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140019264 Wachman et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025692 Pappas Jan 2014 A1
20140147829 Jerauld May 2014 A1
20140152698 Kim et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140169681 Drake Jun 2014 A1
20140176604 Venkitaraman et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140188786 Raichelgauz et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140193077 Shiiyama et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140250032 Huang et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140282655 Roberts Sep 2014 A1
20140300722 Garcia Oct 2014 A1
20140310825 Raichelgauz et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140330830 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140341476 Kulick et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150100562 Kohlmeier et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150120627 Hunzinger et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150254344 Kulkarni et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150286742 Zhang et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150289022 Gross Oct 2015 A1
20150324356 Gutierrez et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160007083 Gurha Jan 2016 A1
20160026707 Ong et al. Jan 2016 A1
20170017638 Satyavarta et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170154241 Shambik et al. Jun 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
0231764 Apr 2002 WO
0231764 Apr 2002 WO
2003005242 Jan 2003 WO
2003067467 Aug 2003 WO
2004019527 Mar 2004 WO
2005027457 Mar 2005 WO
2007049282 May 2007 WO
20070049282 May 2007 WO
2014076002 May 2014 WO
2014137337 Sep 2014 WO
2016040376 Mar 2016 WO
2016070193 May 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (120)
Entry
Boari et al, “Adaptive Routing for Dynamic Applications in Massively Parallel Architectures”, 1995 IEEE, Spring 1995.
Cernansky et al., “Feed-forward Echo State Networks”; Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Montreal, Canada, Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2005.
Chuan-Yu Cho, et al., “Efficient Motion-Vector-Based Video Search Using Query by Clip”, 2004, IEEE, Taiwan, pp. 1-4.
Clement, et al. “Speaker Diarization of Heterogeneous Web Video Files: A Preliminary Study”, Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2011, IEEE International Conference on Year: 2011, pp. 4432-4435, DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947337 IEEE Conference Publications, France.
Cococcioni, et al, “Automatic Diagnosis of Defects of Rolling Element Bearings Based on Computational Intelligence Techniques”, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 2009.
Emami, et al, “Role of Spatiotemporal Oriented Energy Features for Robust Visual Tracking in Video Surveillance, University of Queensland”, St. Lucia, Australia, 2012.
Fathy et al., “A Parallel Design and Implementation for Backpropagation Neural Network Using NIMD Architecture”, 8th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Corsfe rersce, 19'96. MELECON '96, Date of Conference: May 13-16, 1996, vol. 3, pp. 1472-1475.
Foote, Jonathan, et al. “Content-Based Retrieval of Music and Audio”, 1997 Institute of Systems Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore (Abstract).
Gomes et al., “Audio Watermaking and Fingerprinting: For Which Applications?” University of Rene Descartes, Paris, France, 2003.
Gong, et al., “A Knowledge-based Mediator for Dynamic Integration of Heterogeneous Multimedia Information Sources”, Video and Speech Processing, 2004, Proceedings of 2004 International Symposium on Year: 2004, pp. 467-470, DOI: 10.1109/ISIMP.2004.1434102 IEEE Conference Publications, Hong Kong.
Guo et al, “AdOn: An Intelligent Overlay Video Advertising System”, SIGIR, Boston, Massachusetts, Jul. 19-23, 2009.
Howlett et al., “A Multi-Computer Neural Network Architecture in a Virtual Sensor System Application”, International Journal of Knowledge-based Intelligent Engineering Systems, 4 (2). pp. 86-93, 133N 1327-2314; first submitted Nov. 30, 1999; revised version submitted Mar. 10, 2000.
Ihab Al Kabary, et al., “SportSense: Using Motion Queries to Find Scenes in Sports Videos”, Oct. 2013, ACM, Switzerland, pp. 1-3.
International Search Authority: “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” (PCT Rule 43bis.1) including International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/073852; dated Jan. 28, 2009.
International Search Authority: International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) including “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” (PCT Rule 43bis. 1) for the corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/IL2006/001235; dated Jul. 28, 2009.
IPO Examination Report under Section 18(3) for corresponding UK application No. GB1001219.3, dated Sep. 12, 2011.
Iwamoto, K.; Kasutani, E.; Yamada, A.: “Image Signature Robust to Caption Superimposition for Video Sequence Identification”; 2006 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing; pp. 3185-3188, Oct. 8-11, 2006; doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2006.313046.
Jaeger, H.: “The “echo state” approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks”, GMD Report, No. 148, 2001, pp. 1-43, XP002466251 German National Research Center for Information Technology.
Jianping Fan et al., “Concept-Oriented Indexing of Video Databases: Towards Semantic Sensitive Retrieval and Browsing”, IEEE, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2004, pp. 1-19.
Li, et al., “Matching Commercial Clips from TV Streams Using a Unique, Robust and Compact Signature,” Proceedings of the Digital Imaging Computing: Techniques and Applications, Feb. 2005, vol. 0-7695-2467, Australia.
Lin, C.; Chang, S.: “Generating Robust Digital Signature for Image/Video Authentication”, Multimedia and Security Workshop at ACM Mutlimedia '98; Bristol, U.K., Sep. 1998; pp. 49-54.
Lin, et al., “Robust Digital Signature for Multimedia Authentication: A Summary”, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 4th Quarter 2003, pp. 23-26.
Lin, et al., “Summarization of Large Scale Social Network Activity”, Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2009, ICASSP 2009, IEEE International Conference on Year 2009, pp. 3481-3484, DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2009.4960375, IEEE Conference Publications, Arizona.
Liu, et al., “Instant Mobile Video Search With Layered Audio-Video Indexing and Progressive Transmission”, Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on Year: 2014, vol. 16, Issue: 8, pp. 2242-2255, DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2014.2359332 IEEE Journals & Magazines.
Lyon, Richard F.; “Computational Models of Neural Auditory Processing”; IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP '84, Date of Conference: Mar. 1984, vol. 9, pp. 41-44.
Maass, W. et al.: “Computational Models for Generic Cortical Microcircuits”, Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universitaet Graz, Graz, Austria, published Jun. 10, 2003.
Mandhaoui, et al, “Emotional Speech Characterization Based on Multi-Features Fusion for Face-to-Face Interaction”, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France, 2009.
Marti et al, “Real Time Speaker Localization and Detection System for Camera Steering in Multiparticipant Videoconferencing Environments”, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Spain, 2011.
May et al., “The Transputer”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1989, teaches multiprocessing system.
Mei, et al., “Contextual In-Image Advertising”, Microsoft Research Asia, pp. 439-448, 2008.
Mei, et al., “VideoSense—Towards Effective Online Video Advertising”, Microsoft Research Asia, pp. 1075-1084, 2007.
Mladenovic, et al., “Electronic Tour Guide for Android Mobile Platform with Multimedia Travel Book”, Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), 2012 20th Year: 2012, pp. 1460-1463, DOI: 10.1109/TELFOR.2012.6419494 IEEE Conference Publications.
Morad, T.Y. et al.: “Performance, Power Efficiency and Scalability of Asymmetric Cluster Chip Multiprocessors”, Computer Architecture Letters, vol. 4, Jul. 4, 2005 (Jul. 4, 2005), pp. 1-4, XP002466254.
Nagy et al, “A Transputer, Based, Flexible, Real-Time Control System for Robotic Manipulators”, UKACC International Conference on CONTROL '96, Sep. 2-5, 1996, Conference 1996, Conference Publication No. 427, IEE 1996.
Nam, et al., “Audio Visual Content-Based Violent Scene Characterization”, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, 1998, pp. 353-357.
Natsclager, T. et al.: “The “liquid computer”: A novel strategy for real-time computing on time series”, Special Issue on Foundations of Information Processing of Telematik, vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, pp. 39-43, XP002466253.
Nouza, et al., “Large-scale Processing, Indexing and Search System for Czech Audio-Visual Heritage Archives”, Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), 2012, pp. 337-342, IEEE 14th Intl. Workshop, DOI: 10.1109/MMSP.2012.6343465, Czech Republic.
Ortiz-Boyer et aL, “CIXL2: A Crossover Operator for Evolutionary Algorithms Based on Population Features”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 24 (2005) 1-48 Submitted Nov. 2004; published Jul. 2005.
Park, et al., “Compact Video Signatures for Near-Duplicate Detection on Mobile Devices”, Consumer Electronics (ISCE 2014), The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Year: 2014, pp. 1-2, DOI: 10.1109/ISCE.2014.6884293 IEEE Conference Publications.
Raichelgauz, I. et al.: “Co-evolutionary Learning in Liquid Architectures”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, [Online] vol. 3512, Jun. 21, 2005 (Jun. 21, 2005), pp. 241-248, XP019010280 Springer Berlin / Heidelberg ISSN: 1611-3349 ISBN: 978-3-540-26208-4.
Ribert et al. “An Incremental Hierarchical Clustering”, Visicon Interface 1999, pp. 586-591.
Scheper et al, “Nonlinear dynamics in neural computation”, ESANN'2006 proceedings—European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges (Belgium), Apr. 26-28, 2006, d-side publi, ISBN 2-930307-06-4.
Semizarov et al. “Specificity of Short Interfering RNA Determined through Gene Expression Signatures”, PNAS, 2003, pp. 6347-6352.
Shin-Fu Chang, et al., “VideoQ: A Fully Automated Video Retrieval System Using Motion Sketches”, 1998, IEEE, , New York, pp. 1-2.
Theodoropoulos et al, “Simulating Asynchronous Architectures on Transputer Networks”, Proceedings of the Fourth Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing, 1996. PDP '96.
Vailaya, et al., “Content-Based Hierarchical Classification of Vacation Images,” I.E.E.E.: Multimedia Computing and Systems, vol. 1, 1999, East Lansing, MI, pp. 518-523.
Vallet, et al., “Personalized Content Retrieval in Context Using Ontological Knowledge,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 17, No. 3, Mar. 2007, pp. 336-346.
Verstraeten et al., “Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine: a case study”; Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium, Available online Jul. 14, 2005.
Verstraeten et al.: “Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine: a case study”, Information Processing Letters, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 95, No. 6, Sep. 30, 2005 (Sep. 30, 2005), pp. 521-528, XP005028093 ISSN: 0020-0190.
Wang et al. “A Signature for Content-based Image Retrieval Using a Geometrical Transform”, ACM 1998, pp. 229-234.
Wei-Te Li et al., “Exploring Visual and Motion Saliency for Automatic Video Object Extraction”, IEEE, vol. 22, No. 7, Jul. 2013, pp. 1-11.
Whitby-Strevens, “The Transputer”, 1985 IEEE, Bristol, UK.
Xian-Sheng Hua et al.: “Robust Video Signature Based on Ordinal Measure” In: 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP '04; Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China; published Oct. 24-27, 2004, pp. 685-688.
Yanai, “Generic Image Classification Using Visual Knowledge on the Web,” MM'03, Nov. 2-8, 2003, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 167-176.
Zang, et al., “A New Multimedia Message Customizing Framework for Mobile Devices”, Multimedia and Expo, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Year: 2007, pp. 1043-1046, DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2007.4284832 IEEE Conference Publications.
Zeevi, Y. et al.: “Natural Signal Classification by Neural Cliques and Phase-Locked Attractors”, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, IJCNN2006, Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 2006 (Jul. 2006), XP002466252.
Zhou et al., “Ensembling neural networks: Many could be better than all”; National Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing Unviersirty, Hankou Road 22, Nanjing 210093, PR China; Received Nov. 16, 2001, Available online Mar. 12, 2002.
Zhou et al., “Medical Diagnosis With C4.5 Rule Preceded by Artificial Neural Network Ensemble”; IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 7, Issue: 1, pp. 37-42, Date of Publication: Mar. 2003.
Zhu et al., Technology-Assisted Dietary Assessment. Computational Imaging VI, edited by Charles A. Bouman, Eric L. Miller, Ilya Pollak, Proc. of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging, SPIE vol. 6814, 681411, Copyright 2008 SPIE-IS&T. pp. 1-10.
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/054634 dated Mar. 16, 2017, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU.
Johnson, John L., “Pulse-Coupled Neural Nets: Translation, Rotation, Scale, Distortion, and Intensity Signal Invariance for Images.” Applied Optics, vol. 33, No. 26, 1994, pp. 6239-6253.
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/050471, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated May 4, 2017.
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/015831, ISA/RU, Moscow, Russia, dated Apr. 20, 2017.
Brecheisen, et al., “Hierarchical Genre Classification for Large Music Collections”, ICME 2006, pp. 1385-1388.
Lau, et al., “Semantic Web Service Adaptation Model for a Pervasive Learning Scenario”, 2008 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications Year: 2008, pp. 98-103, DOI: 10.1109/CITISIA.2008.4607342 IEEE Conference Publications.
McNamara, et al., “Diversity Decay in Opportunistic Content Sharing Systems”, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks Year: 2011, pp. 1-3, DOI: 10.1109/WoWMoM.2011.5986211 IEEE Conference Publications.
Odinaev, et al., “Cliques in Neural Ensembles as Perception Carriers”, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Canada, 2006, pp. 285-292.
Santos, et al., “SCORM-MPEG: an Ontology of Interoperable Metadata for Multimedia and e-Learning”, 2015 23rd International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM) Year. 2015, pp. 224-228, DOI: 10.1109/SOFTCOM.2015.7314122 IEEE Conference Publications.
Wilk, et al., “The Potential of Social-Aware Multimedia Prefetching on Mobile Devices”, 2015 International Conference and Workshops on Networked Systems (NetSys) Year: 2015, pp. 1-5, DOI: 10.1109/NetSys.2015.7089081 IEEE Conference Publications.
Big Bang Theory Series 04 Episode 12, aired Jan. 6, 2011; [retrieved from Internet: ].
Boari et al, “Adaptive Routing for Dynamic Applications in Massively Parallel Architectures”, 1995 IEEE, Spring 1995, pp. 1-14.
Burgsteiner et al., “Movement Prediction from Real-World Images Using a Liquid State machine”, Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, BE, vol. 3533, Jun. 2005, pp. 121-130.
Cernansky et al, “Feed-forward Echo State Networks”, Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Montreal, Canada, Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2005, pp. 1-4.
Fathy et al, “A Parallel Design and Implementation for Backpropagation Neural Network Using MIMD Architecture”, 8th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, 19'96. MELECON '96, Date of Conference: May 13-16, 1996, vol. 3 pp. 1472-1475, vol. 3.
Freisleben et al, “Recognition of Fractal Images Using a Neural Network”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1993, vol. 6861, 1993, pp. 631-637.
Garcia, “Solving the Weighted Region Least Cost Path Problem Using Transputers”, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, Dec. 1989.
Hogue, “Tree Pattern Inference and Matching for Wrapper Induction on the World Wide Web”, Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 2004, pp. 1-106.
Hogue, “Tree Pattern Inference and Matching for Wrapper Induction on the World Wide Web”, Master's Thesis, Massachusetts institute of Technology, 2004, pp. 1-106.
Howlett et al, “A Multi-Computer Neural Network Architecture in a Virtual Sensor System Application”, International Journal of knowledge-based intelligent engineering systems, 4 (2). pp. 86-93, 133N 1327-2314.
Hua et al., “Robust Video Signature Based on Ordinal Measure”, Image Processing, 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), vol. 1, IEEE, pp. 685-688, 2004.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/050471, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated May 4, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/054634, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated Mar. 16, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/015831, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated Apr. 20, 2017.
Johnson et al, “Pulse-Coupled Neural Nets: Translation, Rotation, Scale, Distortion, and Intensity Signal Invariance for Images”, Applied Optics, vol. 33, No. 26, 1994, pp. 6239-6253.
Lau et al., “Semantic Web Service Adaptation Model for a Pervasive Learning Scenario”, 2008 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications, 2008, pp. 98-103.
Lin et al., “Generating robust digital signature for image/video authentication”, Multimedia and Security Workshop at ACM Multimedia '98, Bristol, U.K., Sep. 1998, pp. 245-251.
Lu et al, “Structural Digital Signature for Image Authentication: An Incidental Distortion Resistant Scheme”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 5, No. 2, Jun. 2003, pp. 161-173.
Lyon, “Computational Models of Neural Auditory Processing”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP '84, Date of Conference: Mar. 1984, vol. 9, pp. 41-44.
May et al, “The Transputer”, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989, vol. 41.
McNamara et al., “Diversity Decay in opportunistic Content Sharing Systems”, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, pp. 1-3.
Morad et al., “Performance, Power Efficiency and Scalability of Asymmetric Cluster Chip Multiprocessors”, Computer Architecture Letters, vol. 4, Jul. 4, 2005, pp. 1-4, XP002466254.
Nagy et al, “A Transputer, Based, Flexible, Real-Time Control System for Robotic Manipulators”, UKACC International Conference on Control '96, Sep. 2-5, 1996, Conference Publication No. 427, IEE 1996.
Natschlager et al., “The “Liquid Computer”: A novel strategy for real-time computing on time series”, Special Issue on Foundations of Information Processing of telematik, vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, pp. 39-43, XP002466253.
Odinaev et al, “Cliques in Neural Ensembles as Perception Carriers”, Technion—Institute of Technology, 2006 International Joint Conference on neural Networks, Canada, 2006, pp. 285-292.
Ortiz-Boyer et al, “CIXL2: A Crossover Operator for Evolutionary Algorithms Based on Population Features”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 24 (2005) Submitted Nov. 2004; published Jul. 2005, pp. 1-48.
Queluz, “Content-Based Integrity Protection of Digital Images”, SPIE Conf. on Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents, San Jose, Jan. 1999, pp. 85-93.
Rui, Yong et al. “Relevance feedback: a power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval.” IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 8.5 (1998): 644-655.
Santos et al., “SCORM-MPEG: an Ontology of Interoperable Metadata for multimediaand E-Leaming”, 23rd International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCom), 2015, pp. 224-228.
Scheper et al, “Nonlinear dynamics in neural computation”, ESANN'2006 proceedings—European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges (Belgium), Apr. 26-28, 2006, d-side publication, ISBN 2-930307-06-4, pp. 1-12.
Schneider et al, “A Robust Content based Digital Signature for Image Authentication”, Proc. ICIP 1996, Lausane, Switzerland, Oct. 1996, pp. 227-230.
Srihari et al., “Intelligent Indexing and Semantic Retrieval of Multimodal Documents”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, May 2000, vol. 2, Issue 2-3, pp. 245-275.
Srihari, Rohini K. “Automatic indexing and content-based retrieval of captioned images” Computer 0 (1995): 49-56.
Stolberg et al, “HIBRID-SOC: A Mul Ti-Core Soc Architecture for Mul Timedia Signal Processing”, 2003 IEEE, pp. 189-194.
Theodoropoulos et al, “Simulating Asynchronous Architectures on Transputer Networks”, Proceedings of the Fourth Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing, 1996. PDP '96, pp. 274-281.
Verstraeten et al, “Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine: a case study”, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium, Available onlline Jul. 14, 2005, pp. 521-528.
Wang et al., “Classifying Objectionable Websites Based onImage Content”, Stanford University, pp. 1-12.
Ware et al, “Locating and Identifying Components in a Robot's Workspace using a Hybrid Computer Architecture” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Aug, 27-29, 1995, pp. 139-144.
Whitby-Strevens, “The transputer”, 1985 IEEE, pp. 292-300.
Wilk et al., “The Potential of Social-Aware Multimedia Prefetching on Mobile Devices”, International Conference and Workshops on networked Systems (NetSys), 2015, pp. 1-5.
Yanagawa et al, “Columbia University's Baseline Detectors for 374 LSCOM Semantic Visual Concepts”, Columbia University Advent Technical Report # 222-2006-8, Mar. 20, 2007, pp. 1-17.
Yanagawa et al., “Columbia University's Baseline Detectors for 374 LSCOM Semantic Visual Concepts”, Columbia University Advent Technical Report #222, 2007, pp. 2006-2008.
Zhou et al, “Ensembling neural networks: Many could be better than all”, National Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, Hankou Road 22, Nanjing 210093, PR China Received Nov. 16, 2001, Available online Mar. 12, 2002, pp. 239-263.
Zhou et al, “Medical Diagnosis With C4.5 Rule Preceded by Artificial Neural Network Ensemble”, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 7, Issue: 1, Mar. 2003, pp. 37-42.
Zhu et al., “Technology-Assisted Dietary Assesment”, Proc SPIE. Mar. 20, 2008, pp. 1-15.
Zou et al., “A Content-Based Image Authentication System with Lossless Data Hiding”, ICME 2003, pp. 213-216.
Chinchor, Nancy A. et al.; Multimedia Analysis + Visual Analytics = Multimedia Analytics; IEEE Computer Society; 2010; pp. 52-60. (Year: 2010).
Marian Stewart B et al., “Independent component representations for face recognition”, Proceedings of the SPIE Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology; Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, San Jose, California, Jan. 1998, pp. 1-12.
Santos et al., “SCORM-MPEG: an Ontology of Interoperable Metadata for multimediaand E-Learning”, 23rd International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCom), 2015, pp. 224-228.
Wang et al., “Classifying Objectionable Websites Based onlmage Content”, Stanford University, pp. 1-12.
Zhou et al, “Ensembling neural networks: Many could be better than all”, National Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, Hankou Road 22, Nanjing 210093, PR China, Available online Mar. 12, 2002, pp. 239-263.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170004656 A1 Jan 2017 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62371862 Aug 2016 US
61860261 Jul 2013 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12603123 Oct 2009 US
Child 13602858 US
Continuation in Parts (12)
Number Date Country
Parent 14050991 Oct 2013 US
Child 15265117 US
Parent 13602858 Sep 2012 US
Child 14050991 US
Parent 12084150 US
Child 12603123 US
Parent 12195863 Aug 2008 US
Child 12603123 US
Parent 12084150 Apr 2009 US
Child 12195863 US
Parent 12348888 Jan 2009 US
Child 12603123 US
Parent 12195863 Aug 2008 US
Child 12348888 US
Parent 12084150 Apr 2009 US
Child 12195863 US
Parent 12538495 Aug 2009 US
Child 12603123 US
Parent 12084150 Apr 2009 US
Child 12538495 US
Parent 12195863 Aug 2008 US
Child 12084150 US
Parent 12348888 Jan 2009 US
Child 12195863 US