The present invention relates generally to protecting electronic devices in electronic systems from electrostatic discharge (ESD) and electromagnetic interference (EMI).
This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art, which may be related to various aspects of the present invention that are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Many modern electronic devices, including television sets, have inputs that are sensitive to ESD and/or EMI. Known protection circuits that have been effective for ESD protection in analog systems are less effective for digital applications. This is in part because of the larger bandwidth required by digital television signals compared to analog signals. Additionally, known protection circuits do not effectively prevent the entry of EMI generated by an external device. Another disadvantage of known ESD protection circuits is that they require significant duplication of components to protect multiple devices connected to a given input. A system and method for protecting electronic devices from effects attributable to ESD and/or EMI in digital signal processing applications is desirable.
Certain aspects commensurate in scope with the disclosed embodiments are set forth below. It should be understood that these aspects are presented merely to provide the reader with a brief summary of certain forms the invention might take and that these aspects are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Indeed, the invention may encompass a variety of aspects that may not be set forth below.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention relates to an electrostatic discharge/electromagnetic interference (ESD/EMI) protection circuit for an integrated circuit. The ESD/EMI protection circuit comprises an input that is adapted to receive a communication signal, a Zener diode pair connected between the input and a ground that is shared with the input, a resistor coupled to the input, and a capacitor coupled in series with the resistor between the input and the integrated circuit.
Advantages of the invention may become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, not all features of an actual implementation are described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
The value of the capacitor CClamp 106 depends on the voltage level needed to protect the target IC 112 from damage. The value of the resistor RESD 108 is chosen to limit current generated by ESD. The Zener diode DESD 110 dissipates and limits the actual ESD event, and the Zener breakdown voltage is usually chosen to be higher than the pin voltage of the target IC 112, but close to a supply voltage of the target IC 112.
Although the ESD protection circuit 100 works relatively well for protecting inputs that receive analog video signals, it is not as effective for protecting inputs that are adapted to receive digital video signals such as high definition television signals. One problem is that the low pass roll-off of the ESD protection circuit 100 typically limits the bandwidth of the input with respect to its ability to receive digital video signals. For example, a typical value of the resistor RESD 108 is about 68 ohms and a typical value of the capacitor CClamp 106 is about 100 picofarads (pf) for a bandwidth of 23 Megahertz (MHz).
Another problem with the ESD protection circuit 100 is that it does not effectively prevent EMI from being coupled out of the video input 102. Digital noise from internal sources such as leaking clock circuits creates undesirable EMI that may interfere with external RF processes.
Yet another problem with the ESD protection circuit 100 is that it requires significant duplication of components if multiple devices such as the target IC 112 are in need of ESD protection or if multiple pins of the target IC 112 are connected to the video input 102. For example, each device or pin needing ESD protection could require additional capacitors, resistors and Zener diodes corresponding to the capacitor CClamp 106, the resistor RESD 108 and the Zener diode DESD 110. In addition to the added expense associated with component replication, circuit board layout could be made more difficult as well.
The video input 202 is adapted to receive a video signal such as a high definition (or other digital) television signal. The operation of the ESD/EMI protection circuit 204 is explained in detail below with respect to
The ESD/EMI protection circuit 300 comprises a back-to-back Zener diode pair DESD 306, referred to hereinbelow as the Zener diode pair DESD 306. The Zener diode pair DESD 306, which is connected between the video input 302 and system ground, is shown in dashed lines in
A resistor RESD 312 and a capacitor CClamp 314 are connected in series between the video input 302 and a target IC device 316. The target IC 316, which may comprise a video switch, is the device being protected from ESD and/or EMI by the ESD/EMI protection circuit 300.
In the exemplary embodiment of the present invention illustrated in
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the effect of RC roll-off is reduced in an exemplary ESD/EMI protection circuit 300 with respect to the known circuit 100 shown in
With respect to EMI protection, the ESD/EMI protection circuit 300 provides RC roll-off in the opposite direction (i.e., from the perspective of the target IC 316). This RC roll-off is provided by the resistor RESD 312 and capacitance of the Zener diode pair DESD 306, which may have a value of about 20 picofarads (pf).
A benefit of an exemplary embodiment of the ESD/EMI protection circuit 300 is that it allows protection of multiple pins on a target IC or even pins on multiple target ICs with only minimal additional circuitry. For example, a capacitor CClamp 318 (shown in dashed lines in
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that an exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides numerous benefits. Among those benefits is reduced part count with respect to known ESD protection circuits, which contributes to reduced system cost. In addition, protection against EMI is added and circuit board layout is simplified with respect to known ESD protection circuits.
While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/000647 | 1/10/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/16/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/085166 | 7/17/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5331351 | Haas | Jul 1994 | A |
5500546 | Marum et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5629776 | Lagoni | May 1997 | A |
5966283 | Glaser et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6008970 | Maloney et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6288885 | Jiang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6972939 | Ho et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7057867 | Vashchenko et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7394638 | Ahmad et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20020130390 | Ker et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3626800 | Feb 1988 | DE |
0681365 | Nov 1995 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100091197 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |