System and method for providing highly available processing of asynchronous requests using distributed request and response queues and a service processor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7953787
  • Patent Number
    7,953,787
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 2, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 31, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
Highly-available processing of an asynchronous request can be accomplished in a single transaction. A distributed request queue receives a service request from a client application or application view client. A service processor is deployed on each node of a cluster containing the distributed request queue. A service processor pulls the service request from the request queue and invokes the service for the request, such as to an enterprise information system. If that service processor fails, another service processor in the cluster can service the request. The service processor receives a service response from the invoked service and forwards the service response to a distributed response queue. The distributed response queue holds the service response until the response is retrieved for the client application.
Description
COPYRIGHT NOTICE

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document of the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the availability of services such as JAVA Message Service (JMS) across a network or in a server cluster.


BACKGROUND

In present application integration (AI) systems, there can be several single points of failure. These single points of failure can include deployment or management facilities, event forwarding, event topics, remote clients, event subscriptions, response listeners, and response queues. Each of these features is tied to a single server within a server cluster. If that single server crashes, the entire AI application can become irreparably damaged and must be rebooted via a server reboot.


Single points of failure such as request and response queue are used for processing asynchronous requests. Current implementations of asynchronous service request processing utilize a single physical request queue and response queue per server instance. In the event of a node failure, all asynchronous requests and responses within a given JMS server, for example, become unavailable until the JMS server is restarted.


BRIEF SUMMARY

Systems and methods in accordance with the present invention can overcome deficiencies in prior art systems by allowing for high-availability processing of asynchronous requests in a single transaction. A distributed request queue can be used to receive and store a service request, such as from a user or client application. A service processor can pull the service request from the request queue and invoke the service for the service request, such as to an enterprise information system. The service processor can receive the service response from the invoked service and forward the service response to a distributed response queue. The distributed response queue can hold the service response until the response is retrieved for the user or client application. An application view client can act on behalf of the user or client application, sending the service request to the distributed request queue and retrieving the service response from the distributed response queue. The application view client can generate failure recovery semantics for the client application in the event of a failure. The application view can also determine whether any service responses are waiting in the distributed response queue for the client application.


These systems and methods can be used in a server cluster. There can be a service processor deployed on every node in the cluster, each of which can listen to a given distributed request queue. This allows a service to be migrated between nodes in the cluster in the event of a node failure.


Other features, aspects, and objects of the invention can be obtained from a review of the specification, the figures, and the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram of a system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is flowchart for a method that can be used with the system of FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A system and method in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention can overcome deficiencies in present asynchronous messaging systems by taking advantage of asynchronous request and response queues, as well as asynchronous request and response processors. A client may wish to invoke a service asynchronously in order to begin and/or continue processing other matters, instead of simply waiting for the response. For example, a long running process such as a batch process run against a SAP system or database can take minutes or even hours. Asynchronous requests can allow a client to send the request and then move on to other business.


The use of server clustering allows an AI component to be used in a scalable and highly available fashion. A highly available component does not have any single points of failure, and can have the ability to migrate services from failed nodes to live nodes in a cluster. Any service offered by the AI component can be targeted to several nodes in a cluster. In the event of a node failure in the cluster, the services located on the failed node can be migrated to another live node in the cluster.


In the event of a crash of a cluster or managed server, the AI application can continue accepting new work. The acceptance of new work can include deploying new and un-deploying old application views and connection factories, monitoring of old application views and connection factories, delivering events from adapters, and servicing both synchronous and asynchronous service invocations. An AI application can also support the manual migration of services on the failed node to a live node, such as a singleton message-driven Enterprise JAVABean (MDB) listening on a physical destination managed by a failed JMS server. Application integration can use a singleton MDB if a customer needs ordered event processing, for example. An AI application can notify users in an understandable and/or predictable way that in-flight transactions have been cancelled or rolled-back, and should be retried. Wherever possible, an AI application can retry the transaction after reestablishing connections to make use of resources on another live server.


In the event of an administration (admin) server failure, an AI application can do all the tasks mentioned with respect to a crash of a cluster or managed server. The AI application can also notify users that deployment or undeployment is unavailable while the admin server is unavailable. The AI application can still boot or reboot successfully using the previous domain and/or server configuration.


A system and method in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention allows asynchronous requests and responses to be available within a given JMS server, even in the event of a node failure. Request and response queues, such as ASYNC_REQUEST_QUEUE and ASYNC_RESPONSE_QUEUE, can be deployed as distributed queues in a cluster. A request processor, such as AsyncServiceRequestProcessor, can be packaged as an MDB. Such a system allows the processing of asynchronous requests and responses even if the JMS server that accepted the requests crashes or becomes otherwise unavailable.


In the event that a physical queue fails before an asynchronous service request is received by the appropriate MDB, the request can be unavailable until the physical queue comes back on line. This can hold true for asynchronous service responses. Using a system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, an asynchronous service processor MDB can be deployed on a single distributed JMS queue, such as ASYNC_REQUEST_QUEUE. This deployment removes the need to maintain and manage a pool of asynchronous request processor threads. An asynchronous service processor MDB can be last in the deployment order for the AI application, and can be deployed from a JAR file such as “ai-asyncprocessor-ejb.jar.”



FIG. 1 shows an example of a high-availability asynchronous service processing system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. An application view client 100 has the ability to generate and deal with failure recovery semantics without the user having any knowledge or input. For instance, a client application that sends off a request might crash or otherwise become unavailable at some point before the response is received. When the response is ready to be returned, the response can sit in an asynchronous response queue 112 until the client comes back. When the client 100 is available again, the client will want to receive the response. Since the system is utilizing distributed queues, the client application would need to go out to the server and determine whether there are any responses from previous requests that were sent before the failure. The application view client 100 can take care of this determination behind the scenes, such that the user or client application does not need to do anything to find the response.


The user or client application making the request can register a message listener 106, such that the user or client application can be informed that a message is ready and waiting to be received. An asynchronous service processor 110 can pull a request off the asynchronous request queue 108, invoke the asynchronous service against an Enterprise Information System (EIS) 118, and wait for the response. When the asynchronous service response comes back, the asynchronous service processor 110 can put the response onto the response queue 112. In this embodiment, this processing is accomplished as a single transaction.


The application view client 100 can instantiate an application view instance 102. The client 100 can have the option of supplying a durable client identifier at the time of construction. The durable client identifier can be used as a correlation identifier for asynchronous response messages. The client 100 can invoke an asynchronous service method, such as “invokeServiceAsync”, and can pass a request document and response listener 104, such as AsyncServiceResponseListener, to handle the response.


An application view instance 102 can create a service request object, such as AsyncServiceRequest, and can send the object to a request queue 108, such as ASYNC_REQUEST_QUEUE. The service request object can contain the name of the destination to which the response listener is pinned. A service processor MDB 110 can use this information to determine the physical destination to receive the response. If the request object does not contain the name of a response destination, the service processor MBD 110 can use the destination set on the JMS message via a call to a method such as JMSReplyTo( ). If a client only supplies a service response listener 104 to the application view, such as:

    • invokeServiceAsync(String serviceName, IDocument request, AsyncServiceResponseListener listener);


      the application view can establish a JMS queue receiver to the JMS queue bound at a JNDI location provided by an application view Enterprise JAVABean (EJB) method, such as getAsyncResponseQueueJNDIName( ). The application view instance 102 can use QueueReceiver::getQueue( ) to set the ReplyTo destination on the request message.


In a cluster, an asynchronous request queue 108 can be deployed as a distributed JMS queue. Each message can be sent to a single physical queue, and not be forwarded or replicated in any way. As such, the message is only available from the physical queue to which it was sent. If that physical queue becomes unavailable before a given message is received, the message or AsyncServiceRequest can be unavailable until that physical queue comes back on-line. It is not enough to send a message to a distributed queue and expect the message to be received by a receiver of that distributed queue. Since the message is sent to only one physical queue, there must be a queue receiver receiving or listening on that physical queue. Thus, an AI asynchronous service processor MDB can be deployed on all nodes in a cluster.


An asynchronous service processor MDB can receive the message from the queue in a first-in, first-out (FIFO) manner. The service processor can use the asynchronous service request object in a JMS ObjectMessage to determine the qualified name, service name, request document, and response destination of the application view. The asynchronous service processor 110 can use an application view EJB 114 to invoke the service synchronously. The service can be translated into a synchronous CCI-based request and/or response to the resource adapter 116.


When an asynchronous service processor MDB 110 receives the response, the response can be encapsulated into an asynchronous service response object and sent to the response destination provided in the asynchronous service request object. The asynchronous service processor MDB 110 cannot just send the response to the asynchronous response queue 112, the response needs to be sent to a specific physical destination. This specific physical destination, or queue, can have been established by the application view instance 102 running on the client when, for example, an application view EJB method such as getAsyncResponseQueueJNDIName( ) was called.


If the client application fails and a new application view is created with the same durable client identifier, there is a chance that the new application view will be pinned to a different physical JMS queue than the JMS queue that the client was using prior to the failure. Consequently, the application view can use recover logic to query the other members for responses that match the durable client identifier once the client application restarts.


An application view message listener 106 instance, created when the application view instance 102 was instantiated, can receive the asynchronous service response message as a JMS ObjectMessage, and can pass the message to the asynchronous service response listener 104 supplied in the “invokeServiceAsync” call.



FIG. 2 shows the steps of a method that can be used with the system of FIG. 1. First, a service request is received to a distributed request queue from a client application 200. The service request is pulled from the request queue to a service processor 202. If the service processor is down, another service processor in the cluster pulls the service request 204. A service is invoked for the service request, such as to an EIS 206. The service response is retrieved by the service processor and forwarded to a distributed response queue for storage until retrieval from a client application 208. A response listener listens to the response queue and notifies the client application when the service response is received 210.


The foregoing description of preferred embodiments of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalence.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: a client that invokes an asynchronous service by supplying a request document that defines the asynchronous service invocation and a response listener to handle a response to the asynchronous service invocation;a distributed input queue including multiple physical queues, wherein upon receiving the request document, a service request object is instantiated based on the request document and placed in the distributed input queue, wherein the service request object identifies a destination to which the response listener is pinned;a service processor to pull the service request object from the distributed input queue and invoke the service, wherein the service processor receives a response to the service invocation;a distributed output queue to receive and store the response from the service processor, the distributed output queue including more than one physical queue, wherein the service processor uses the identification in the service request object to determine the physical queue to receive the response.
  • 2. A system according to claim 1, further comprising: an enterprise information system containing the service invoked by the first service processor.
  • 3. A system according to claim 1, wherein the service processor is packaged as a message-driven Enterprise JAVABean.
  • 4. A system according to claim 1, further comprising: an application view client for sending the service request to the distributed input queue and retrieving the response from the distributed output queue on behalf of the client.
  • 5. A system according to claim 4, wherein the application view client generates failure recovery semantics for the client.
  • 6. A system according to claim 4, wherein the distributed output queue is adapted to store the response until the response is retrieved by the application view client.
  • 7. A system according to claim 4, wherein the application view is determines whether any responses are waiting in the distributed output queue for the client.
  • 8. A system according to claim 4, further comprising: a client identifier for identifying the client application, the client identifier used to process the service request and response for the client.
  • 9. A system according to claim 1, further including a second service processor that is deployed on a different node in a cluster.
  • 10. A method for highly available processing of asynchronous requests, said method comprising: receiving, from a client, a request document that defines an asynchronous service invocation and a response listener to handle a response to the asynchronous service invocation;instantiating a service request object based on the request document and storing the service request object into a distributed input queue that includes multiple physical queues, wherein the service request object identifies a destination to which the response listener is pinned;pulling, by a service processor, the service request object from the distributed input queue and invoking the service by the service processor, wherein the service processor receives a response to the service invocation;receiving the response from the service processor and storing the response into a distributed output queue, the distributed output queue including more than one physical queue, wherein the service processor uses the identification in the service request object to determine the physical queue to receive the response.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, further comprising: invoking, by the service processor, an enterprise information system (EIS).
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the service processor is packaged as a message-driven Enterprise JAVABean.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, further comprising: sending, by an application view client, the service request to the distributed input queue and retrieving the response from the distributed output queue on behalf of the client.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the application view client generates failure recovery semantics for the client.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the distributed output queue stores the response until the response is retrieved by the application view client.
  • 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the application view is determines whether any responses are waiting in the distributed output queue for the client.
  • 17. The method of claim 10, further comprising: supplying a client identifier for identifying the client, the client identifier used to process the service request and response for the client.
  • 18. The method of claim 10, further including providing a second service processor that is deployed on a different node in a cluster.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 11/684,435, filed Mar. 9, 2007, entitled “DISTRIBUTED REQUEST AND RESPONSE QUEUES FOR SERVICE PROCESSOR”, which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 10/293,059, filed Nov. 13, 2002, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING HIGHLY AVAILABLE PROCESSING OF ASYNCHRONOUS SERVICE REQUESTS” which is now U.S. Pat. No. 7,222,148, issued on May 22, 2007; and to U.S. application Ser. No. 60/377,332, filed May 2, 2002, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING HIGHLY AVAILABLE PROCESSING OF ASYNCHRONOUS SERVICE REQUESTS” which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference. The following applications are cross-referenced and incorporated herein by reference: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/271,194, filed Oct. 15, 2002, entitled “APPLICATION VIEW COMPONENT FOR SYSTEM INTEGRATION,” which is now U.S. Pat. No. 7,080,092, issued on Jul. 18, 2006, by Mitch Upton. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/293,674 entitled “HIGH AVAILABILITY EVENT TOPIC” by Tim Potter et al., filed Nov. 13, 2002. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/293,655 entitled “HIGH AVAILABILITY APPLICATION VIEW DEPLOYMENT” by Tim Potter et al., filed Nov. 13, 2002. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/293,656, filed Nov. 13, 2002, entitled “HIGH AVAILABILITY FOR EVENT FORWARDING,” which is now U.S. Pat. No. 7,155,438, issued on Dec. 26, 2006, by Tim Potter et al.

US Referenced Citations (145)
Number Name Date Kind
5469562 Saether Nov 1995 A
5544318 Schmitz et al. Aug 1996 A
5592664 Starkey Jan 1997 A
5604860 McLaughlin et al. Feb 1997 A
5630131 Palevich et al. May 1997 A
5944794 Okamoto et al. Aug 1999 A
5966535 Benedikt et al. Oct 1999 A
5991808 Broder et al. Nov 1999 A
6012083 Savitzky et al. Jan 2000 A
6012094 Leymann et al. Jan 2000 A
6016495 McKeehan et al. Jan 2000 A
6018730 Nichols et al. Jan 2000 A
6021443 Bracho et al. Feb 2000 A
6023578 Birsan et al. Feb 2000 A
6023722 Colyer Feb 2000 A
6029000 Woolsey et al. Feb 2000 A
6070184 Blount et al. May 2000 A
6128279 O'Neil et al. Oct 2000 A
6141701 Whitney Oct 2000 A
6154769 Cherkasova et al. Nov 2000 A
6185734 Saboff et al. Feb 2001 B1
6212546 Starkovich et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226666 Chang et al. May 2001 B1
6230309 Turner et al. May 2001 B1
6237135 Timbol May 2001 B1
6243737 Flanagan et al. Jun 2001 B1
6311327 O'Brien et al. Oct 2001 B1
6330602 Law et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334114 Jacobs et al. Dec 2001 B1
6360358 Elsbree et al. Mar 2002 B1
6367068 Vaidyanathan et al. Apr 2002 B1
6411698 Bauer et al. Jun 2002 B1
6442611 Navarre et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445711 Scheel et al. Sep 2002 B1
6470364 Prinzing Oct 2002 B1
6516322 Meredith Feb 2003 B1
6535908 Johnson et al. Mar 2003 B1
6553425 Shah et al. Apr 2003 B1
6584454 Hummel et al. Jun 2003 B1
6601113 Koistinen et al. Jul 2003 B1
6609115 Mehring et al. Aug 2003 B1
6615258 Barry et al. Sep 2003 B1
6622168 Datta Sep 2003 B1
6636491 Kari et al. Oct 2003 B1
6637020 Hammond Oct 2003 B1
6643652 Helgeson et al. Nov 2003 B2
6654932 Bahrs et al. Nov 2003 B1
6662357 Bowman-Amuah Dec 2003 B1
6681251 Leymann et al. Jan 2004 B1
6684388 Gupta et al. Jan 2004 B1
6687702 Vaitheeswaran et al. Feb 2004 B2
6721740 Skinner et al. Apr 2004 B1
6721779 Maffeis Apr 2004 B1
6754181 Elliott et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754884 Lucas et al. Jun 2004 B1
6782416 Cochran et al. Aug 2004 B2
6789054 Makhlouf Sep 2004 B1
6823495 Vedula et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826260 Vincze et al. Nov 2004 B1
6832238 Sharma et al. Dec 2004 B1
6836883 Abrams et al. Dec 2004 B1
6847981 Song et al. Jan 2005 B2
6859180 Rivera Feb 2005 B1
6859834 Arora et al. Feb 2005 B1
6874143 Murray et al. Mar 2005 B1
6889244 Gaither et al. May 2005 B1
6922827 Vasilik et al. Jul 2005 B2
6950872 Todd, II Sep 2005 B2
6963914 Breitbart et al. Nov 2005 B1
6971096 Ankireddipally et al. Nov 2005 B1
7000219 Barrett et al. Feb 2006 B2
7017146 Dellarocas et al. Mar 2006 B2
7043722 Bau, III May 2006 B2
7051072 Stewart et al. May 2006 B2
7051316 Charisius et al. May 2006 B2
7062718 Kodosky et al. Jun 2006 B2
7069507 Alcazar et al. Jun 2006 B1
7072934 Helgeson et al. Jul 2006 B2
7073167 Iwashita Jul 2006 B2
7076772 Zatloukal Jul 2006 B2
7089584 Sharma Aug 2006 B1
7096422 Rothschiller et al. Aug 2006 B2
7107578 Alpern Sep 2006 B1
7111243 Ballard et al. Sep 2006 B1
7117504 Smith et al. Oct 2006 B2
7127507 Clark et al. Oct 2006 B1
7127704 Van De Vanter et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130891 Bernardin et al. Oct 2006 B2
7143186 Stewart et al. Nov 2006 B2
7146422 Marlatt et al. Dec 2006 B1
7155705 Hershberg et al. Dec 2006 B1
7165041 Guheen et al. Jan 2007 B1
7181731 Pace et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184967 Mital et al. Feb 2007 B1
7222148 Potter et al. May 2007 B2
7240331 Vion-Dury et al. Jul 2007 B2
7260599 Bauch et al. Aug 2007 B2
7260818 Iterum et al. Aug 2007 B1
7363495 Felt et al. Apr 2008 B2
7594230 Deily et al. Sep 2009 B2
7831655 Upton Nov 2010 B2
20020010781 Tuatini Jan 2002 A1
20020035604 Cohen et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020073396 Crupi et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020111922 Young et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116454 Dyla et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120685 Srivastava et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020143960 Goren et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161826 Arteaga et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169644 Greene Nov 2002 A1
20020174178 Stawikowski Nov 2002 A1
20020174241 Beged-Dov et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188486 Gil et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194244 Raventos Dec 2002 A1
20020194267 Flesner et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194495 Gladstone et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004746 Kheirolomoom et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030005181 Bau et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009511 Giotta et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018661 Darugar Jan 2003 A1
20030018832 Amirisetty et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018963 Ashworth et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023957 Bau et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028364 Chan et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030028579 Kulkarni et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030043191 Tinsley et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030046591 Asghari-Kamrani et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030051066 Pace et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055868 Fletcher et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055878 Fletcher et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030074217 Beisiegel et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030079029 Garimella et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030084203 Yoshida et al. May 2003 A1
20030105805 Jorgenson Jun 2003 A1
20030126136 Omoigui Jul 2003 A1
20040019645 Goodman et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040040011 Bosworth et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040078373 Ghoneimy et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040103406 Patel May 2004 A1
20040148336 Hubbard et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050050068 Vaschillo et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050278585 Spencer Dec 2005 A1
20060206856 Breeden et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060234678 Juitt et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070038500 Hammitt et al. Feb 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2248634 Mar 2000 CA
WO9923558 May 1999 WO
WO 0029924 May 2000 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090164571 A1 Jun 2009 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60377332 May 2002 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11684435 Mar 2007 US
Child 12396375 US
Parent 10293059 Nov 2002 US
Child 11684435 US