System and method for providing icing condition warnings

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10494108
  • Patent Number
    10,494,108
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 17, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 3, 2019
    4 years ago
Abstract
A hazard warning system can be utilized in an aircraft. The hazard warning system can include a processing system configured to determine an icing condition. The icing condition can be annunciated and/or displayed. An avionic display can be used to display the icing condition in response to a sum of icing concentration factors along a radial or flight path.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 9,846,230 filed Dec. 21, 2015 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,864,055, 9,823,347, 9,720,082 and 9,244,166. The present application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 9,395,438, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,902,100. The present application is also related to U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,515,087, 7,486,219, 7,598,902, and 7,129,885, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties and assigned to the assignee of the present application.


BACKGROUND

Embodiments of the inventive concepts disclosed herein generally relate to the display of a weather hazard warning, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation to the display of a weather hazard warning related to one or more icing conditions.


Conventional aircraft hazard weather radar systems, such as the WXR 2100 MultiScan™ radar system manufactured by Rockwell Collins, Inc., have Doppler capabilities and are capable of detecting at least four parameters: weather range, weather reflectivity, weather velocity, and weather spectral width or velocity variation. The weather reflectivity is typically scaled to green, yellow, and red color levels that are related to rainfall rate. The radar-detected radial velocity variation can be scaled to a turbulence level and displayed as magenta. Such weather radar systems can conduct vertical sweeps and obtain reflectivity parameters at various altitudes.


Ice crystals pose threats to aircraft and their components. For example, sensors can provide improper readings when clogged by ice. Probes and engines can also be susceptible to damage caused by mixed phase and glaciated ice crystals when operating near areas of deep convection and at higher altitudes. Engine rollback issues are believed to be related to ice crystal accretion, followed by aggregate detachment in solid form before continuing through the aircraft engine. Detection and display of high altitude ice crystallization has been proposed.


SUMMARY

In one aspect, the inventive concepts disclosed herein are directed to an aircraft hazard warning system. The aircraft hazard warning system includes a processing system configured to cause an electronic display to display an icing condition symbol in response to a presence of an icing condition. The processing system is configured to determine the presence of the icing condition using summation of an icing concentration factor at locations along an azimuth.


In a further aspect, the inventive concepts disclosed herein are directed to a method of providing an icing condition symbol on an electronic aircraft display using an electronic processor. The method includes receiving radar reflectivity data, determining an ice concentration factor for each of a number of range bins associated with respective location, and displaying the icing condition symbol in response to a summation of the ice concentration factor at each of the range bins being in a relationship with a threshold.


In a further aspect, the inventive concepts disclosed herein are directed to an aircraft weather radar system. The aircraft weather radar system includes a radar antenna configured to receive radar returns, and a processing system in communication with the radar antenna. The processing system is configured to receive the radar returns and provide radar return data. The processing system is also configured to determine a number of ice concentration factors for a number of respective range bins associated with the radar returns using the radar return data. The processing system is also configured to determine a presence of an icing condition using a relationship between a combination of the ice concentration factors and a threshold.


In yet further aspects, the inventive concepts disclosed herein relate to an icing warning can be displayed using bars, regions, or lines indicating a location of the icing condition and/or a level of the icing condition.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Some embodiments will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, and:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view schematic illustration of an aircraft control center, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 2 is a side view schematic illustration of the nose of an aircraft including a weather radar system, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 3 is a general block diagram of a hazard warning system including an icing condition module, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 4 is a more detailed block diagram of the hazard warning system illustrated in FIG. 3;



FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of a horizontal plan view weather display showing an icing condition warning according to some embodiments;



FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of a horizontal plan view weather display showing an icing condition warning, according to some embodiments; and



FIG. 7 is a schematic flow diagram showing icing condition detection operations, according to some embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Hazard warning systems and methods according to the inventive concepts disclosed herein detect one or more icing conditions and display one or more icing condition warnings. In some embodiments, systems and methods discussed herein provide icing condition warnings that are more elegantly displayed than proposed methods such as methods that place a color over any areas where radar reflectivity exceeds a predetermined threshold in some embodiments. Advantageously, the warnings are provided to make the crew aware of hazardous icing conditions or ice crystal concentration without effectively blocking off large portions of the display or human machine interface (HMI) in some embodiments. Further, the warnings are provided to represent levels of icing conditions in a fashion that is less likely to confuse the crew when presented with other HMI information, such as, navigation beacons, flight path information, runway icons, textual information, weather regions, or symbols found overlaid with weather displays in some embodiments.


In some embodiments, the systems and methods detect icing conditions by considering not only ice crystal density but duration of the exposure by the aircraft, the type of aircraft/engine, and the specific flight path. In some embodiments, the systems and methods advantageously integrate ice crystal concentration detected by weather radar and show such detected regions along flight paths or radials where the integrated concentration exceeds a predetermined threshold. In some embodiments, the detected regions are only shown for flight paths or radials where the integrated concentration exceeds a predetermined threshold.


Referring now to FIG. 1, an illustration of an aircraft control center 10 or cockpit is shown, according to some embodiments. The aircraft control center 10 includes displays 20 (e.g., flight display) and controls 22 for a human machine interface (HMI) which are generally used to increase visual range and to enhance decision-making abilities. In some embodiments, the displays 20 may provide an output from a radar system, communication devices, and other sensors of the aircraft. For example, the displays 20 may provide a top-down view, a horizontal view, vertical view/perspective or 3 dimensional view, or any other view of weather and/or terrain detected by a radar system on the aircraft. The views of weather may include monochrome or color graphical representations 24 of the weather on the display. The controls 22 of the aircraft control center 10 may further include other user interface elements such as knobs, joysticks or touch interfaces, an audio device 30 (e.g., speaker, electro-acoustic transducer, etc.) and illuminating or flashing lamps 40. Weather can be displayed as colored regions on the displays 20 according to ARINC standards.


In some embodiments, an icing condition warning 42 is provided on any of displays 20 as part of a weather radar display or other flight display. In some embodiments, the icing condition warning 42 is displayed as colored line or bar indicating the presence and level of the icing condition. In some embodiments, the icing condition warning is an icon or symbol.


Referring to FIG. 2, the front of an aircraft 101 is shown with aircraft control center 10 and nose 100, according to an exemplary embodiment. A hazard warning system 300 is configured to provide icing condition warnings such as the icing condition warning 42 to the displays 20 (FIG. 1) in some embodiments. The hazard warning system 300 includes or is in communication with a radar system 200 in some embodiments.


The radar system 200 (e.g., a weather radar system or other radar system) is generally located within the nose 100 of the aircraft 101 or within the aircraft control center 10 of aircraft 101. According to some embodiments, the radar system 200 is located on the top of aircraft 101 or on the tail of aircraft 101. The radar system 200 can include or be coupled to an antenna system including an antenna 210. A variety of different antennas or radar systems may be used as part of the radar system 200 (e.g., a split aperture antenna, a monopulse antenna, a sequential lobbing antenna, etc.).


The radar system 200 generally works by sweeping a radar beam horizontally back and forth across the sky. Some embodiments of the radar system 200 conduct a first horizontal sweep 104 first tilt angle 1 (a tilt angle 108) and a second horizontal sweep 106 at second tilt angle (a tilt angle 110). The tilt angles 108 and 110 can be with respect to horizontal 112 (e.g., 0 degrees). The radar system 200 can also conduct vertical sweeps to further characterize and identify weather phenomena. Returns from different tilt angles can be electronically merged to form a composite image for display on an electronic display (e.g., one of the displays 20 in FIG. 1). Returns can also be processed to, for example, distinguish between terrain and weather, to determine the height of terrain, or to determine the height of weather. The radar system 200 can be a WXR-2100 MultiScan™ radar system or similar system manufactured by Rockwell Collins and configured as described herein. According to other embodiments, the radar system 200 may be an RDR-4000 system or similar system manufactured by Honeywell International, Inc. configured as described herein. The radar system 200 may be integrated with other avionic equipment and user interface elements in the aircraft control center 10 (e.g., the flashing lights 40, the displays 20, display elements on a weather radar display, display elements on a terrain display, audio devices 30, navigation systems, TAWs equipment, etc.). In some embodiments, the radar system 200 includes dual polarization or dual frequency capabilities that allow sensing of ice crystal concentrations based upon a comparison of returns at different polarizations or frequencies.


Referring to FIG. 3, a block diagram of a hazard warning system 300 includes or is in communication with the radar system 200 in some embodiments. The hazard warning system 300 includes processing electronics 304 and includes or is coupled to avionics equipment 312 and aircraft sensors 314. The hazard warning system 300 uses the processing electronics 304 to detect an icing condition and provide an auditory warning or a visual symbol of the icing condition to the display 20.


The processing electronics 304 are connected to or in communication with the avionics equipment 312 and the aircraft sensors 314 and include a high altitude associated threat (HAAT) module 334, a high altitude ice crystal (HAIC) module 340, and an icing condition module 342. The HAAT and HAIC modules 334 and 340 advantageously detect and locate HAAT and HAIC conditions, and the icing condition module 342 uses data from the HAAT and HAIC modules 334 and 340 to cause the display 20 to provide a visual and/or audio warning of an icing condition. In some embodiments, the icing condition module 342 uses a summation of ice crystal concentration levels at areas or bins along a radial or direction and compares the summation to a threshold to sense or detect an icing condition. In some embodiments, ice crystal concentration levels are provided by the HAAT and HAIC modules 334 and 340, by off aircraft equipment via the avionics equipment 312 (e.g., radios), by the radar system 200, by the aircraft sensors 314, or combinations thereof.


In some embodiments, the icing condition module 342 receives or calculates an icing concentration parameter per area or bin, accumulates the parameter along a radial, route, flight path, or direction, and compares the accumulated value to a threshold indicative of an icing condition level. In some embodiments, the parameter is a directly sensed indication of ice particle concentration or a prediction or inference of such concentrations.


In some embodiments, the icing condition module 342 uses Equation 1 below to detect an icing condition along a particular a radial, route, flight path, or direction.











Provide





icing





condition





symbol





for





a





radial





or





direction





when









k
=
1

n



I
k





T


(


engine





type

,

aircraft





type


)











(

Equation





1

)








Where

    • n=number of range bins to maximum detection range
    • Ik=Predicted ice crystal concentration in the k′th range bin along the radial or direction
    • T=Threshold


In some embodiments, the threshold T is a fixed number or is a function of engine type, exposure time, and aircraft type. The threshold T is lower for high efficiency, high bypass turbofan engines. The threshold T can also be a function of the operating mode of the engine (e.g., the threshold is lower for fuel efficient mode) or time of exposure.


In some embodiments, the icing condition module 342 uses Equation 2 below to detect an icing condition along a particular a radial, route, flight path, or direction.










Provide





icing





condition





symbol





when





at





specific





bin





n





along





a





radial





or





direction





where









k
=
1


n
-
1




I
k



<


T


(


engine





type

,

aircraft





type


)







and









k
=
1

n



I
k





T


(


engine





type

,

aircraft





type


)






(

Equation





2

)







Equation 2 allows the symbol to represent a range to the icing condition. Equations 1 and 2 are exemplary only. Bins between the aircraft 101 and the bin before the summation exceeding the threshold are not presented as being subject to an icing condition according to Equation 2 and hence are eliminated from the display 20 in some embodiments.


In some embodiments, the HAAT and HAIC modules 334 and 340 process data associated with weather radar reflectivity levels and data from other sensors (e.g., temperature, altitude, etc.) to determine HAAT and HAIC conditions and provide icing concentration measurements or estimates to the icing condition module 342. For example, HAAT and HAIC modules 334 and 340 can estimate icing conditions (or ice crystal concentrations at locations based upon temperature, altitude, wind speed, and reflectivity levels.


The processing electronics 304 are further shown as connected to aircraft sensors 314 which may generally include any number of sensors configured to provide data to processing electronics 304. For example, the aircraft sensors 314 include temperature sensors, humidity sensors, infrared sensors, altitude sensors, a gyroscope, a global positioning system (GPS), or any other aircraft-mounted sensors that may be used to provide data to the processing electronics 304 in some embodiments. It should be appreciated that the aircraft sensors 314 (or any other component shown connected to the processing electronics 304) may be indirectly or directly connected to the processing electronics 304. Avionics equipment 312 can be or include a flight management system, a navigation system, a backup navigation system, or another aircraft system configured to provide inputs to the processing electronics 304.


In some embodiments, the radar system 200 is a weather radar system. The radar system 200 includes the radar antenna 210 (e.g., a weather radar antenna) connected (e.g., directly, indirectly) to an antenna controller and receiver/transmitter circuit 212. The antenna controller and receiver/transmitter circuit 202 includes any number of mechanical or electrical components or modules for steering a radar beam and receiving radar returns and providing radar data. For example, the antenna controller and receiver/transmitter circuit 202 is configured to mechanically tilt the radar antenna 210 in a first direction while mechanically rotating the radar antenna 210 in a second direction. In other embodiments, a radar beam may be electronically swept along a first axis and mechanically swept along a second axis. In yet other embodiments, the radar beam may be entirely electronically steered (e.g., by electronically adjusting the phase of signals provided from adjacent antenna apertures, etc.). The antenna controller and receiver/transmitter circuit 202 is configured to conduct the actual signal generation that results in a radar beam being provided from the radar antenna 310 and to conduct the reception of returns received at the radar antenna 310. Radar return data is provided from the antenna controller and receiver/transmitter circuit 202 to processing electronics 304 for processing. For example, processing electronics 304 can be configured to interpret the returns for display on display 20.


The processing electronics 304 is configured to provide control signals or control logic to the antenna controller and receiver/transmitter circuit 202 in some embodiments. For example, depending on pilot or situational inputs, the processing electronics 304 can be configured to cause the antenna controller and receiver/transmitter circuit 202 to change behavior or radar beam patterns. The processing electronics 304 include the processing logic for operating weather radar system 200 in some embodiments. It should be noted that the processing electronics 304 are integrated into the radar system 200 or located remotely from the radar system 200, for example, in aircraft control center 10 in some embodiments.


Referring to FIG. 4, a detailed block diagram of the processing electronics 304 of FIG. 3 is shown, according to some embodiments. The processing electronics 304 includes a memory 320 and a processor 322. The processor 322 may be or include one or more microprocessors, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a circuit containing one or more processing components, a group of distributed processing components, circuitry for supporting a microprocessor, or other hardware configured for processing. According to an exemplary embodiment, the processor 322 is configured to execute computer code stored in the memory 320 to complete and facilitate the activities described herein. The memory 320 can be any volatile or non-volatile memory device capable of storing data or computer code relating to the activities described herein. For example, the memory 320 includes the modules 328-342 which are computer code modules (e.g., executable code, object code, source code, script code, machine code, etc.) configured for execution by the processor 322. When executed by the processor 322, the processing electronics 304 is configured to complete the activities described herein. In some embodiments, modules 328-342 can be circuitry configured for the operations described herein. The processing electronics 304 include hardware circuitry for supporting the execution of the computer code of the modules 328-342 in some embodiments. For example, the processing electronics 304 include hardware interfaces (e.g., an output 350) for communicating control signals (e.g., analog, digital) from the processing electronics 304 to the antenna controller and receiver/transmitter circuit 212 or to the display 20. The processing electronics 304 may also include an input 355 for receiving, for example, radar return data from the antenna controller and receiver/transmitter circuit 212, feedback signals from the antenna controller and receiver/transmitter 212 or for receiving data or signals from other systems or devices.


The memory 320 includes a memory buffer 324 for receiving radar return data. The radar return data may be stored in memory buffer 324 until buffer 324 is accessed for data. For example, a core threat module 328, an overflight module 330, an electrified region module 332, the HAAT module 334, a display control module 338, the HAIC module 340, the icing detection module 342 or another process that utilizes radar return data may access the memory buffer 324. The radar return data stored in memory 320 may be stored according to a variety of schemes or formats. For example, the radar return data may be stored in an x,y or x,y,z format, a heading-up format, a north-up format, a latitude-longitude format, a radial format, or any other suitable format for storing spatial-relative information.


The memory 320 further includes configuration data 326. The configuration data 326 includes data relating to weather radar system 200. For example, the configuration data 326 may include beam pattern data which may be data that a beam control module 336 can interpret to determine how to command the antenna controller and receiver/transmitter circuit 202 to sweep a radar beam. For example, configuration data 326 may include information regarding maximum and minimum azimuth angles of horizontal radar beam sweeps, azimuth angles at which to conduct vertical radar beam sweeps, timing information, speed of movement information, dual polarization mode information, dual frequency mode information and the like. The configuration data 326 may also include data, such as threshold values, model information, aircraft identification data, engine identification data, engine mode data, look up tables, and the like used by modules 328-342 to identify and assess threats to aircraft 101.


The memory 320 is further shown to include a core threat module 328 which includes logic for using radar returns in memory buffer 324 to make one or more determinations or inferences relating to core threats to aircraft 101. For example, the core threat module 328 may use temperature and radar return values at various altitudes to calculate a probability that lightning, hail, and/or strong vertical shearing exists within a weather cell. The core threat module 328 may be configured to compare the probability and/or severity of the core threat to a threshold value stored, for example, in the core threat module 328 or the configuration data 326. The core threat module 328 may further be configured to output a signal to display control module 338 indicative of the probability of the core threat, of the inferred threat level within the weather cell, or of the inferred threat level within the weather cell being greater than the measured threat due to radar returns from rainfall. The signal may further cause a change in a color on aviation display 20 associated to the threat level to aircraft 101.


The memory 320 is further shown to include an overflight module 330 which includes logic for using radar returns in memory buffer 324 to make one or more determinations or inferences based on weather below aircraft 101. For example, overflight module 330 may be configured to determine the growth rate of a weather cell and/or the change in altitude of an echo top of a weather cell over time. The overflight module 330 may further be configured to calculate a probability that a weather cell will grow into the flight path of aircraft 101. The overflight module 330 may be configured to output a signal to display control module 338 indicating the threat of the growing weather cell in relation to the flight path of aircraft 101. For example, the signal may indicate predicted intersection of the flight path of aircraft 101 and the weather cell, rate of growth of the weather cell, or predicted growth of the weather cell to within a threshold distance of the flight path of aircraft 101. For example, the signal may cause an icon to be displayed on the display 20 in a location corresponding to the growing cell, wherein the size of the icon may represent the size, amount, or probability of threat to the aircraft. The overflight module 330 may be configured to inhibit display of weather far below, and thus not a threat to, the aircraft 101. The overflight module 330 is configured to provide information related to the flight path of the aircraft 101 for use in selection flight paths or radials for detecting icing condition using the icing condition module 342.


The memory 320 is further shown to include an electrified region module 332 which includes logic for using radar returns in the memory buffer 324 to make one or more determinations or inferences regarding potentially electrified regions around the weather cell. For example, the electrified region module 332 may be configured to use temperature and reflectivity to determine whether a region around a weather cell is likely to produce lightning. The electrified region module 332 may be configured to determine a probability of aircraft 101 producing a lightning strike if the aircraft flies through a particular region based on the reflectivity around a convective cell near the freezing layer. The electrified region module 332 may further be configured to cause a pattern to be displayed on the display 20. For example, the electrified region module 332 may be configured to output a signal to the display control module 338 indicating the existence, location, and/or severity of risk of the electrified region.


The memory 320 is further shown to include HAAT module 334 which includes logic for using radar returns (e.g., data) in the memory buffer 324 to make one or more determinations or inferences regarding high altitude associated threats (e.g., threats related to a blow off or anvil region of a weather cell). HAAT conditions can be associated with high severity threat conditions such as hail, lightning, turbulence, etc.


For example, the HAAT module 334 may be configured to use wind speed, wind direction, and size of a weather cell to predict the presence of an anvil region downwind of a weather cell that may contain lightning, hail, and/or turbulence. The HAAT module 334 may be configured to cause a pattern (e.g., a red speckled region) to be displayed on the display 20. For example, the HAAT module 334 and the display control module 338 can be configured to output a signal to display control module 338 indicating the existence, location, and severity or risk of the anvil region. HAAT module 334 can detect a HAAT condition based upon the presence of convective cells reaching high altitudes and having anvil shapes. Such conditions can be sensed using the techniques described in U.S. application Ser. Nos. 13/919,406 and 13/84,893. Ice crystals may be present in a HAAT region. A HAAT condition generally is a more significant threat than a HAIC condition. The HAAT module 334 is configured to determine ice crystal concentrations levels on a per area or per bin basis in some embodiments.


In one embodiment, the HAIC module 340 can infer a HAIC condition. In one embodiment, the HAIC condition can be inferred by the following process. If radar system 300 detects temperature anomalies and large areas of weaker reflectivity in the vicinity of a convective core, vertical scans and/or auxiliary horizontal scans can be commanded via the beam control module 3336 to look for the presence of high water content (high reflectivity) beneath the areas that were depicted as weaker reflectivity (green or black). If such a scenario is identified using the vertical and horizontal beams, the area is tagged as potential for ice crystal icing or a HAIC condition. In some embodiments, the HAIC module 340 configured to estimate ice crystal concentrations levels on a per area or per bin basis (e.g., based upon the difference in water content at altitudes) in some embodiments.


The memory 320 includes the icing detection module 342 which includes logic for using radar returns in the memory buffer 324 to make one or more determinations or inferences regarding ice crystal concentrations per bin or per area. The icing detection module 342 can be combined with the display control module 338, be a hard wired ASIC, or programmable logic circuit in one embodiment. The icing detection module 342 and the radar system 200 can be configured to use coherent and non-coherent integration processes discussed in related U.S. application Ser. No. 14/206,239 incorporated herein by reference to detect ice crystal concentrations and their location in some embodiments. Alternatively, the icing detection module 342 and the radar system 200 can utilize a dual frequency or dual polarization process to determine ice crystal concentrations discussed in related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/206,651 incorporated herein by reference in some embodiments. In some embodiments, radar return data is be processed by comparing the data to known ice crystal return characteristics to determine an icing concentration level match. The ice crystal concentrations can be provided by an external source. The icing detection module 342 can use various techniques for determining ice crystal concentrations on a per bin or per area basis. The types of ice crystal concentration detection techniques are not discussed in a limiting fashion.


The icing detection module 342 can be configured to cause a line or bar (as icing condition symbol 42 (FIG. 1)) to be displayed on the display 20 in in some embodiments. The icing condition symbol is provided in response to Equations 1 or 2 executed by the icing condition module 342 in some embodiments. In some embodiments, the icing condition symbol represents a location of the icing condition and severity or risk of the icing condition in some embodiments. The display control module 338 causes the appropriate video signal to be provided to the display 20 for display of the icing condition symbol in some embodiments.


The memory 320 includes a beam control module 336. The beam control module 336 may be an algorithm for commanding circuit 302 to sweep a radar beam. The beam control module 336 may be used, for example, to send one or more analog or digital control signals to circuit 302. The control signals may be, for example, an instruction to move the antenna mechanically, an instruction to conduct an electronic beam sweep in a certain way, an instruction to move the radar beam to the left by five degrees, etc. The beam control module 336 may be configured to control timing of the beam sweeps or movements relative to aircraft speed, flight path information, transmission or reception characteristics from the radar system 200 or otherwise. The beam control module 336 may receive data from the configuration data 326 for configuring the movement of the radar beam.


The memory 320 includes the display control module 338 which includes logic for displaying weather information on the display 20. For example, the display control module 338 may be configured to display radar return information received from the memory buffer 324 and to determine a gain level or other display setting for display of an inferred threat to aircraft 101 on a weather radar display.


Referring now to FIG. 5, a schematic illustration of the display 20 showing a weather radar display image 500 including precipitative (or weather) regions 502, 504, and 506 corresponding to radar returns according to an exemplary embodiment. The processing electronics 304 (FIG. 4) is configured to cause the display 20 to show measured threats to aircraft 101 using symbology, icons, or text. In FIG. 5, light rain is shown as a slanted down right to left cross hatched area region (e.g., region 502), which is often indicated with a green color on display 20. A moderate rain is shown as a slanted down left to right cross hatched region (e.g., region 504) in FIG. 5 often colored yellow on display 20 to indicate caution to the crew. Solid black regions (e.g., region 506) in FIG. 5 correspond to heavy rain, and are usually colored red on display 20 to indicate warning to the crew. The area outside of regions 502, 504, and 506 can have a black color on display 20 to indicate a very low or zero precipitation rate in one embodiment. The regions 502, 504, and 506 can be shown in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards.


In some embodiments, an icing condition symbol 520 is provided outside of or at the edge of the displayed range for the weather radar display image 500 as a colored bar. The icing condition symbol 520 is arcuate and colored to represent a level of the icing condition. Equation 1 can be used to determine the radials that are delineated by the icing condition symbol 520. The icing condition symbol 520 is computed for each azimuth angle as the summation of predicted ice crystal concentration over all range bins out to the maximum detection range of the function. As shown in FIG. 5, an icing condition is detected in azimuth from 30 to 00 degrees.


Display of the icing condition symbol 520 is triggered when the integrated ice crystal concentration exceeds a given threshold in some embodiments. The threshold is a function of aircraft type or engine type in some embodiments. Multiple thresholds are used for multiple levels (e.g, red, yellow, green). The specific color of the icing condition symbol 520 represents specific threshold concentration in some embodiments. The weather radar display image 500 using the using the icing condition symbol 520 has the advantage of removing large icon covered areas for icing warnings from the weather display image 500 and concentrating the data only in the outer range ring thus providing heading guidance to the crew while simultaneously avoiding confusion with other navigation or textual information in some embodiments.


Generally, a crew flies through green regions 502, always avoids red regions 506, and uses their best judgment on yellow regions 504. In the example shown in FIG. 5, a crew heading to the right of the aircraft's track on display 500 may decide to bank right and fly through regions 502 rather than climbing or banking left to avoid the weather cell (region 506) directly in front of aircraft 101 and the icing condition represented by the icing condition symbol 520.


Referring now to FIG. 6, a schematic illustration of the display 20 showing a weather radar display image 600 including precipitative (or weather) regions 602, 604, and 606 (similar to the regions 502, 504 and 506) corresponding to radar returns according to an exemplary embodiment. The processing electronics 304 (FIG. 4) is configured to cause the display 20 to show measured threats to aircraft 101 using symbology, icons, or text.


In some embodiments, an icing condition symbol 620 is provided as a contoured bar or line representing the range to the icing condition. The icing condition symbol 620 is colored to represent a level of the icing condition in some embodiments. Equation 2 can be used to determine the radials and range that are delineated by the icing condition symbol 620 where the contoured bar indicates range and azimuth at which point hazardous ice accretion is expected in some embodiments.


In some embodiments, the icing condition symbol is icon, such as, a colored wind shear-type icon covering an area of the icing condition. The color represents a level of the icing condition (e.g., mild, moderate, severe) The azimuth extent of the icon is determined as all azimuth radials in which the summation of predicted ice concentration exceeds a predetermined threshold as provided by Equation 1 in some embodiments. The maximum range of the icon is the range where the summation of the predicted ice content exceeds the threshold as provided by Equation 2 in some embodiments. This type of symbol has the advantage of clearly delineating both range and azimuth extent of the hazard in an unambiguous manner which is difficult to confuse with other iconic information on the display 20.


In some embodiments, the icing condition module 342 (FIG. 4) takes into account the duration of exposure of ice crystals which exceed a given threshold. This duration is computed based on aircraft airspeed. While the integration-based detection discussed above is generally spatial in nature (e.g., the ice crystal concentration is accumulated along the radials originating from the existing aircraft position until a threshold was reached at which point the icing condition symbol is applied), a refinement of this integration scheme takes into account the duration of exposure of ice crystals which exceed a given threshold. This duration is computed based on aircraft airspeed. For example, for each bin along a given radial, the mean of ice crystal accumulation (e.g., ice crystal concentration) is computed for a given distance D in front of each bin. The distance D is computed based on a predetermined threshold of duration for ice crystal exposure and the airspeed of the aircraft. The icing condition symbol or warning is provided when the mean of ice crystal accumulation over the distance D exceeds a second threshold in some embodiments. Example I below provides pseudo code for duration of exposure-based icing warnings according to some embodiments. Example 1 below provides an exemplary scheme and does not limit the claims or the discussion of the embodiments disclosed herein.


Referring to FIG. 7, a flow 700 is performed by hazard warning system 300 (FIG. 2) for icing detection and warning. At an operation 702, radar returns are received from the radar system 200. At an operation 704, ice crystal concentrations or susceptibility to icing accumulations are determined. In some embodiments, the ice crystal concentrations are determined on a per bin basis from the radar return data (e.g., polarized returns, dual frequency returns, power returns), the radar return data and other sensor data or warnings (e.g., altitude, temperature, blow off regions, cells, HAIC, HAAT, etc.), external data (e.g., NEXRAD, Satellite, etc.), or combinations thereof.


At an operation 706, zones for a flight path or radials for environment are selected. At an operation 710, icing crystal concentrations or susceptibility to icing accumulations are combined along a selected radial or zone of the flight path. The icing crystal concentrations or susceptibility to icing accumulations can be combined by summing or integrating in some embodiments by the icing condition module 342. At an operation 712, the combination is compared to one or more thresholds indicative of an icing condition in some embodiments. The thresholds can be a function of aircraft type, aircraft engine, or engine operational mode in some embodiments.


At an operation 718, the hazard warning system 300 determines if all radials or zones have been completed. If not, the hazard warning system 300 returns to operation 706 and completes the operations 706, 710 and 712 for the next radial or zone. If so, the hazard warning system 300 advances to the operation 720 and displays an icing condition warning. In some embodiments, the icing condition warning is indicative of the azimuthal extent and range to the icing condition.












Example I - A Pseudo Code for Icing Condition Detection Using


Ice Crystal Exposure Time


















Stating:




TT = Threshold time for engine rollback




IWCT = IWC threshold for engine rollback




DT = Threshold distance for engine rollback




VAC = Aircraft velocity




RangeBinLength = extent of a range bin




RangeMAX = max range of the HAIC function




RangeBinMAX = index of the max range bin of the HAIC




function




RadialeMAX = max number of radiale in a scan




IWC(radiale_index,range_bin_index) = IWC estimated in a




specific range bin index in a specific radiale




HAIC_ALERT(radiale_index,range_bin_index) = Alert to be




raised in a specific range bin and specific radiale




We have:




DT = VAC × TT




for radiale_index = 1:RadialeMAX




 for range_bin_index = 1:RangeBinMAX




  start_analysis_range_bin = range_bin_index;




  end_analysis_range_bin = start_analysis_range_bin + DT /




  RangeBinLength;




  IWCmean = sum(IWC(radiale_index




, start_analysis_range_bin:end_analysis_range_bin)) /




(end_analysis_range_bin − start_analysis_range_bin);




  if IWCmean > IWCT




   HAIC_ALERT(radiale_index,range_bin_index+




end_analysis_range_bin) = TRUE;




  else




   HAIC_ALERT(radiale_index,range_bin_index+




end_analysis_range_bin) = FALSE;




  end




 end




end









The construction and arrangement of the systems and methods as shown in the various exemplary embodiments are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.). For example, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the inventive concepts disclosed herein.


According to various exemplary embodiments, electronics 304 may be embodied as hardware and/or software. In exemplary embodiments where the processes are embodied as software, the processes may be executed as computer code on any processing or hardware architecture (e.g., a computing platform that can receive reflectivity data from a weather radar system) or in any weather radar system such as the WXR-2100 system available from Rockwell Collins, Inc. or an RDR-400 system available from Honeywell, Inc. The processes can be performed separately, simultaneously, sequentially or independently with respect to each other.


While the detailed drawings, specific examples, detailed algorithms and particular configurations given describe exemplary embodiments, they serve the purpose of illustration only. The inventive concepts disclosed are not limited to the specific forms and equations shown. For example, the methods may be performed in any of a variety of sequence of steps or according to any of a variety of mathematical formulas. The hardware and software configurations shown and described may differ depending on the chosen performance characteristics and physical characteristics of the weather radar and processing devices. For example, the type of system components and their interconnections may differ. The systems and methods depicted and described are not limited to the precise details and conditions disclosed. The flows and pseudo code show exemplary operations only. The specific data types and operations are shown in a non-limiting fashion. Furthermore, other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims.


Some embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure may include program products comprising machine-readable storage media for carrying or having machine-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such machine-readable storage media can be any available media which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. By way of example, such machine-readable storage media can include RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, CD ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of machine-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of machine-readable storage media. Machine-executable instructions include, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing machine to perform a certain function or group of functions. Machine or computer-readable storage media, as referenced herein, do not include transitory media (i.e., signals in space).

Claims
  • 1. An aircraft hazard warning system, comprising: a processing system configured to cause an electronic display to display an icing condition symbol in response to a presence of an icing condition, the processing system being configured to determine the presence of the icing condition using summation of an icing concentration factor at locations along a first direction, wherein the first direction is along a radial or a flight path and the icing concentration factor is an ice particle concentration per bin, wherein the locations are each associated with a bin associated with an area along the radial, the radial being a second direction of a radar beam, wherein each area is between a maximum radar range and an antenna associated with the radar beam along the radial.
  • 2. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the locations extend to a maximum detection range.
  • 3. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the icing condition symbol is a bar presented at an edge of a scan range of the electronic display.
  • 4. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the icing condition symbol is a bar presented at an edge of a scan range of the electronic display and extends across an azimuth range associated with azimuthal extent of the icing condition.
  • 5. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the icing condition symbol is colored to represent a level of the icing condition.
  • 6. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the summation is compared to at least one threshold representing the icing condition.
  • 7. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 6, wherein the threshold is a function of aircraft type or engine type.
  • 8. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the locations are areas along a radial.
  • 9. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the locations are associated with weather radar range bins along the radial.
  • 10. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the icing condition symbol is a contoured bar representing a range to the icing condition for a plurality of radials on the electronic display.
  • 11. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 10, wherein the presence of the icing condition is determined at the locations where the summation is above a threshold along the radial and an absence of the icing condition is determined at the locations along the radial where the summation is below the threshold.
  • 12. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the icing condition symbol represents an area of the icing condition for a plurality of radials on the electronic display, wherein the area is determined using the summation at each of the radials.
  • 13. A method of providing an icing condition symbol on an electronic aircraft display using an electronic processor, the method comprising: receiving radar reflectivity data;determining an ice concentration factor for each of a plurality of range bins associated with respective locations; anddisplaying the icing condition symbol in response to a summation of the ice concentration factor at each of the range bins and a threshold, wherein the threshold is determined based upon an engine type or engine operating mode.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the summation is comprised of the ice concentration factor for the range bins along a radial.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the electronic processor is part of an avionic weather radar system.
  • 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the threshold is a function of aircraft type.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein the threshold is two or more thresholds.
  • 18. An aircraft weather radar system, comprising: a radar antenna configured to receive radar returns; anda processing system in communication with the radar antenna and configured to receive the radar returns and provide radar return data, the processing system being configured to determine a plurality of ice concentration factors for a plurality of respective range bins associated with the radar returns using the radar return data, the processing system being configured to determine a presence of an icing condition using a summation of the ice concentration factors and a threshold, wherein each of the ice concentration factors are an ice particle concentration per a respective range bin of the range bins.
  • 19. The aircraft weather radar system of claim 18 further comprising: a display for providing weather images, the display providing an icing condition symbol as a bar at a maximum range of the display or as a contoured bar within the maximum range.
  • 20. The aircraft weather radar system of claim 18 further comprising: a display for providing weather images, the display providing an icing condition symbol representing an area of the icing condition.
US Referenced Citations (269)
Number Name Date Kind
650275 Reeve May 1900 A
3251057 Buehler et al. May 1966 A
3359557 Fow et al. Dec 1967 A
3404396 Buchler et al. Oct 1968 A
3465339 Marner Sep 1969 A
3491358 Hicks Jan 1970 A
3508259 Andrews Apr 1970 A
3540829 Collinson et al. Nov 1970 A
3567915 Altshuler et al. Mar 1971 A
3646555 Atlas Feb 1972 A
3715748 Hicks Feb 1973 A
3764719 Dell Oct 1973 A
3781530 Britland et al. Dec 1973 A
3781878 Kirkpatrick Dec 1973 A
3803609 Lewis et al. Apr 1974 A
3885237 Kirkpatrick May 1975 A
3943511 Evans et al. Mar 1976 A
3964064 Brandao et al. Jun 1976 A
3968490 Gostin Jul 1976 A
4015257 Fetter Mar 1977 A
4043194 Tanner Aug 1977 A
4223309 Payne Sep 1980 A
4283715 Choisnet Aug 1981 A
4283725 Chisholm Aug 1981 A
4318100 Shimizu et al. Mar 1982 A
4346595 Frosch et al. Aug 1982 A
4430654 Kupfer Feb 1984 A
4435707 Clark Mar 1984 A
4459592 Long Jul 1984 A
4533915 Lucchi et al. Aug 1985 A
4555703 Cantrell Nov 1985 A
4600925 Alitz et al. Jul 1986 A
4613937 Batty, Jr. Sep 1986 A
4613938 Hansen et al. Sep 1986 A
4649388 Atlas Mar 1987 A
4658255 Nakamura et al. Apr 1987 A
4660038 Greneker, III Apr 1987 A
4684950 Long Aug 1987 A
4742353 D'Addio et al. May 1988 A
4761650 Masuda et al. Aug 1988 A
4803470 Fineman Feb 1989 A
4835536 Piesinger et al. May 1989 A
RE33152 Atlas Jan 1990 E
4914444 Pifer et al. Apr 1990 A
4928131 Onozawa May 1990 A
4940987 Frederick Jul 1990 A
5036334 Henderson et al. Jul 1991 A
5049886 Seitz et al. Sep 1991 A
5057820 Markson et al. Oct 1991 A
5077558 Kuntman Dec 1991 A
5095754 Hsu Mar 1992 A
5105191 Keedy Apr 1992 A
5130712 Rubin et al. Jul 1992 A
5159407 Churnside et al. Oct 1992 A
5164731 Borden et al. Nov 1992 A
5173704 Buehler et al. Dec 1992 A
5175551 Rubin Dec 1992 A
5177487 Taylor et al. Jan 1993 A
5198819 Susnjara Mar 1993 A
5202690 Frederick Apr 1993 A
5208600 Rubin May 1993 A
5221924 Wilson, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5262773 Gordon Nov 1993 A
5262782 Rubin et al. Nov 1993 A
5291208 Young Mar 1994 A
5296865 Lewis Mar 1994 A
5311183 Mathews et al. May 1994 A
5311184 Kuntman May 1994 A
5331330 Susnjara Jul 1994 A
5396220 Markson et al. Mar 1995 A
5402116 Ashley Mar 1995 A
5469168 Anderson Nov 1995 A
5479173 Yoshioka et al. Dec 1995 A
5485157 Long Jan 1996 A
5517193 Allison et al. May 1996 A
5521603 Young May 1996 A
5534868 Gjessing et al. Jul 1996 A
5568151 Merritt Oct 1996 A
5583972 Miller Dec 1996 A
5592171 Jordan Jan 1997 A
5602543 Prata et al. Feb 1997 A
5615118 Frank Mar 1997 A
5648782 Albo et al. Jul 1997 A
5654700 Prata et al. Aug 1997 A
5657009 Gordon Aug 1997 A
5686919 Jordan et al. Nov 1997 A
5726656 Frankot Mar 1998 A
5757322 Ray et al. May 1998 A
5771020 Markson et al. Jun 1998 A
5828332 Frederick Oct 1998 A
5838239 Stern et al. Nov 1998 A
5839080 Muller et al. Nov 1998 A
5907568 Reitan, Jr. May 1999 A
5920276 Frederick Jul 1999 A
5945926 Ammar et al. Aug 1999 A
5973635 Albo Oct 1999 A
5974875 Leslie et al. Nov 1999 A
6000285 Leslie et al. Dec 1999 A
6034760 Rees Mar 2000 A
6043756 Bateman et al. Mar 2000 A
6043757 Patrick Mar 2000 A
6081220 Fujisaka et al. Jun 2000 A
6118382 Hibbs Sep 2000 A
6138060 Conner et al. Oct 2000 A
6154151 McElreath et al. Nov 2000 A
6154169 Kuntman Nov 2000 A
6177873 Cragun Jan 2001 B1
6201494 Kronfeld Mar 2001 B1
6208284 Woodell et al. Mar 2001 B1
6236351 Conner et al. May 2001 B1
6237405 Leslie May 2001 B1
6240369 Foust May 2001 B1
6246367 Markson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6281832 McElreath Aug 2001 B1
6289277 Feyereisen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297772 Lewis Oct 2001 B1
6320511 Cronin Nov 2001 B1
6339747 Daly et al. Jan 2002 B1
6340946 Wolfson et al. Jan 2002 B1
6377202 Kropfli et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377207 Solheim et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381538 Robinson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6388607 Woodell May 2002 B1
6388608 Woodell et al. May 2002 B1
RE37725 Yamada Jun 2002 E
6405134 Smith et al. Jun 2002 B1
6424288 Woodell Jul 2002 B1
6441773 Kelly et al. Aug 2002 B1
6456226 Zheng et al. Sep 2002 B1
6480142 Rubin Nov 2002 B1
6496252 Whiteley Dec 2002 B1
6501392 Gremmert et al. Dec 2002 B2
6512476 Woodell Jan 2003 B1
6518914 Peterson et al. Feb 2003 B1
6549161 Woodell Apr 2003 B1
6560538 Schwinn et al. May 2003 B2
6563452 Zheng et al. May 2003 B1
6577947 Kronfeld et al. Jun 2003 B1
6590520 Steele et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597305 Szeto et al. Jul 2003 B2
6603425 Woodell Aug 2003 B1
6606564 Schwinn et al. Aug 2003 B2
6614382 Cannaday et al. Sep 2003 B1
6650972 Robinson et al. Nov 2003 B1
6667710 Cornell et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670908 Wilson et al. Dec 2003 B2
6677886 Lok Jan 2004 B1
6683609 Baron et al. Jan 2004 B1
6690317 Szeto et al. Feb 2004 B2
6703945 Kuntman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6720906 Szeto et al. Apr 2004 B2
6738010 Steele et al. May 2004 B2
6741203 Woodell May 2004 B1
6744382 Lapis et al. Jun 2004 B1
6771207 Lang Aug 2004 B1
6788043 Murphy et al. Sep 2004 B2
6791311 Murphy et al. Sep 2004 B2
6828922 Gremmert et al. Dec 2004 B1
6828923 Anderson Dec 2004 B2
6839018 Szeto et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850185 Woodell Feb 2005 B1
6856908 Devarasetty et al. Feb 2005 B2
6879280 Bull et al. Apr 2005 B1
6882302 Woodell et al. Apr 2005 B1
6917860 Robinson et al. Jul 2005 B1
6977608 Anderson et al. Dec 2005 B1
7030805 Ormesher et al. Apr 2006 B2
7042387 Ridenour et al. May 2006 B2
7082382 Rose et al. Jul 2006 B1
7109912 Paramore et al. Sep 2006 B1
7116266 Vesel et al. Oct 2006 B1
7129885 Woodell et al. Oct 2006 B1
7132974 Christianson Nov 2006 B1
7139664 Kelly et al. Nov 2006 B2
7145503 Abramovich et al. Dec 2006 B2
7161525 Finley Jan 2007 B1
7200491 Rose et al. Apr 2007 B1
7205928 Sweet Apr 2007 B1
7259714 Cataldo Aug 2007 B1
7292178 Woodell et al. Nov 2007 B1
7307576 Koenigs Dec 2007 B1
7307577 Kronfeld et al. Dec 2007 B1
7307583 Woodell et al. Dec 2007 B1
7307586 Peshlov et al. Dec 2007 B2
7307756 Walmsley Dec 2007 B2
7352317 Finley et al. Apr 2008 B1
7352929 Hagen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7365674 Tillotson et al. Apr 2008 B2
7372394 Woodell et al. May 2008 B1
7383131 Wey et al. Jun 2008 B1
7417578 Woodell et al. Aug 2008 B1
7417579 Woodell Aug 2008 B1
7427943 Kronfeld et al. Sep 2008 B1
7436361 Paulsen et al. Oct 2008 B1
7471995 Robinson Dec 2008 B1
7486219 Woodell et al. Feb 2009 B1
7486220 Kronfeld et al. Feb 2009 B1
7492304 Woodell et al. Feb 2009 B1
7492305 Woodell et al. Feb 2009 B1
7515087 Woodell et al. Apr 2009 B1
7515088 Woodell et al. Apr 2009 B1
7528613 Thompson et al. May 2009 B1
7541971 Woodell et al. Jun 2009 B1
7557735 Woodell et al. Jul 2009 B1
7576680 Woodell Aug 2009 B1
7581441 Barny et al. Sep 2009 B2
7598901 Tillotson et al. Oct 2009 B2
7598902 Woodell et al. Oct 2009 B1
7633428 McCusker et al. Dec 2009 B1
7633431 Wey et al. Dec 2009 B1
7664601 Daly, Jr. Feb 2010 B2
7696921 Finley et al. Apr 2010 B1
7714767 Kronfeld et al. May 2010 B1
7728758 Varadarajan et al. Jun 2010 B2
7733264 Woodell et al. Jun 2010 B1
7859448 Woodell et al. Dec 2010 B1
7868811 Woodell et al. Jan 2011 B1
7917255 Finley Mar 2011 B1
7932853 Woodell et al. Apr 2011 B1
7973698 Woodell et al. Jul 2011 B1
7982658 Kauffman et al. Jul 2011 B2
8022859 Bunch et al. Sep 2011 B2
8054214 Bunch Nov 2011 B2
8072368 Woodell Dec 2011 B1
8081106 Yannone Dec 2011 B2
8089391 Woodell et al. Jan 2012 B1
8098188 Costes et al. Jan 2012 B2
8098189 Woodell et al. Jan 2012 B1
8111186 Bunch et al. Feb 2012 B2
8159369 Koenigs et al. Apr 2012 B1
8217828 Kirk Jul 2012 B2
8228227 Bunch et al. Jul 2012 B2
8314730 Musiak et al. Nov 2012 B1
8332084 Bailey et al. Dec 2012 B1
8902100 Woodell et al. Dec 2014 B1
9019146 Finley et al. Apr 2015 B1
20020039072 Gremmert et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020126039 Dalton et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030001770 Cornell et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025627 Wilson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030117311 Funai Jun 2003 A1
20030193411 Price Oct 2003 A1
20040183695 Ruokangas et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040239550 Daly, Jr. Dec 2004 A1
20050049789 Kelly et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050174350 Ridenour et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060036366 Kelly et al. Feb 2006 A1
20070005249 Dupree et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070152867 Randall Jul 2007 A1
20080158049 Southard et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090177343 Bunch Jul 2009 A1
20090219197 Bunch Sep 2009 A1
20100019938 Bunch Jan 2010 A1
20100042275 Kirk Feb 2010 A1
20100110431 Ray et al. May 2010 A1
20100194628 Christianson et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100201565 Khatwa Aug 2010 A1
20100245164 Kauffman Sep 2010 A1
20100302094 Bunch et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110074624 Bunch Mar 2011 A1
20110148692 Christianson Jun 2011 A1
20110148694 Bunch et al. Jun 2011 A1
20120029786 Calandra et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120133551 Pujol et al. May 2012 A1
20120139778 Bunch et al. Jun 2012 A1
20130226452 Watts Aug 2013 A1
20130234884 Bunch Sep 2013 A1
20140176362 Sneed Jun 2014 A1
20140362088 Veillette et al. Dec 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
1 329 738 Jul 2003 EP
2658617 Aug 1991 FR
WO-9807047 Feb 1998 WO
WO-9822834 May 1998 WO
WO-03005060 Jan 2003 WO
WO-2009137158 Nov 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (124)
Entry
Heymsfield, A.J., A. Bansemer, C. Schmitt, C. Twohy, and M.R. Poellot, 2004: Effective Ice Particle Densities Derived from Aircraft Data. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 982-1003,https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0982:EIPDDF>2.0.CO;2  (Year: 2004).
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/213,256 dated Oct. 19, 2018. 9 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, filed Oct. 24, 2005, Woodell et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, filed Apr. 12, 2006, Woodell et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, filed Mar. 7, 2008, Woodell et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769, filed Sep. 27, 2011, Rockwell Collins.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052, filed Dec. 17, 2012, Woodell et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,538, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Kronfeld et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/841,893, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,406, filed Jun. 17, 2013, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,844, filed Nov. 21, 2013, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/162,035, filed Jan. 23, 2014, Kevin M. Kronfeld et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,239, filed Mar. 12, 2014, Rockwell Collins.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,651, filed Mar. 12, 2014, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,034, filed Mar. 12, 2014, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/323,766, filed Jul. 3, 2014, Weichbrod et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/465,730, filed Aug. 21, 2014, Breiholz et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/465,753, filed Aug. 21, 2014, Arlen E. Breiholz et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,071, filed Jan. 28, 2015, Breiholz et al.
3-D Weather Hazard and Avoidance System, Honeywell InteVue Brochure dated Nov. 2008, 4 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Feb. 13, 2013, 3 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Nov. 8, 2010, 3 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Oct. 15, 2010, 3 pages.
Boudevillain et al., 2003, Assessment of Vertically Integrated Liquid (VIL) Water Content Radar Measurement, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20, 807-819.
Bovith et al., Detecting Weather Radar Clutter by Information Fusion with Satellite Images and Numerical Weather Prediction Model Output; Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2006, 4 pages.
Burnham et al., Thunderstorm Turbulence and Its Relationship to Weather Radar Echoes, J. Aircraft, Sep.-Oct. 1969, 8 pages.
Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS), www.II.mit.edu/mission/aviation/faawxsystems/ciws.html, received on Aug. 19, 2009, 3 pages.
Decision on Appeal for Inter Parties Reexamination Control No. 95/001,860, dated Oct. 17, 2014, 17 pages.
Doviak et al., Doppler Radar and Weather Observations, 1984, 298 pages.
Dupree et al.,FAA Tactical Weather Forecasting in the United States National Airspace, Proceedings from the World Weather Research Symposium on Nowcasting and Very Short Term Forecasts, Toulouse, France, 2005, 29 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,663 dated Mar. 7, 2013, 13 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Apr. 1, 2014, 11 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Jan. 22, 2015, 6 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769 dated Sep. 16, 2014, 18 pages.
Goodman et al., LISDAD Lightning Observations during the Feb. 22-23, 1998 Central Florida Tornado Outbreak, http:www.srh.noaa.gov/topics/attach/html/ssd98-37.htm, Jun. 1, 1998, 5 pages.
Greene et al., Vertically Integrated Liquid Water—A New Analysis Tool, Monthly Weather Review, Jul. 1972, 5 pages.
Hodanish, Integration of Lightning Detection Systems in a Modernized National Weather Service Office, http://www.srh.noaa.gov/mlb/hoepub.html, retrieved on Aug. 6, 2007, 5 pages.
Honeywell, RDR-4B Forward Looking Windshear Detection/Weather Radar System User's Manual with Radar Operation Guidelines, Jul. 2003.
Keith, Transport Category Airplane Electronic Display Systems, Jul. 16, 1987, 34 pages.
Klingle-Wilson et al., Description of Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS) Weather Products, Aug. 1, 2005, 120 pages.
Kuntman et al, Turbulence Detection and Avoidance System, Flight Safety Foundation 53rd International Air Safety Seminar (IASS), Oct. 29, 2000.
Kuntman, Airborne System to Address Leading Cause of Injuries in Non-Fatal Airline Accidents, ICAO Journal, Mar. 2000.
Kuntman, Satellite Imagery: Predicting Aviation Weather Hazards, ICAO Journal, Mar. 2000, 4 pps.
Lahiff, 2005, Vertically Integrated Liquid Density and Its Associated Hail Size Range Across the Burlington, Vermont County Warning Area, Eastern Regional Technical Attachment, No. 05-01, 20 pages.
Liu, Chuntao et al., Relationships between lightning flash rates and radar reflectivity vertical structures in thunderstorms over the tropics and subtropics, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 177, D06212, doi:10.1029/2011JDo17123,2012, American Geophysical Union, 2012, 19 pages.
Meteorological/KSC/L71557/Lighting Detection and Ranging (LDAR), Jan. 2002, 12 pages.
Nathanson, Fred E., “Radar and Its Composite Environment,” Radar Design Principles, Signal Processing and the Environment, 1969, 5 pages, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York et al.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated May 27, 2015, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,235 dated Apr. 23, 2015, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/681,901 dated Jun. 17, 2015, 21 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,663 dated May 29, 2013, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Jul. 8, 2014, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Mar. 27, 2015, 21 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Sep. 23, 2013, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052 dated Feb. 11, 2015, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052 dated Sep. 9, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/841,893 dated Jun. 22, 2015, 27 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/913,100 dated May 4, 2015, 25 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,406 dated Jul. 14, 2015, 23 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/162,035, dated Feb. 4, 2016, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,844, dated Nov. 10, 2015, 17 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/631,253, dated Jul. 28, 2005, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, dated May 27, 2009, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, dated Dec. 30, 2008, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, dated Nov. 4, 2008, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,102, dated Jan. 20, 2012, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103 dated Aug. 4, 2014, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769 dated Jan. 8, 2015, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/707,438 dated Feb. 25, 2015, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/681,901, dated Dec. 23, 2015, 8 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, dated Aug. 21, 2007, 4 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/631,253, dated Jan. 14, 2004, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/631,253, dated Jun. 30, 2004, 4 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, dated Dec. 5, 2006, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, dated Jul. 28, 2008, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, dated Jun. 22, 2006, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, dated Aug. 15, 2007, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, dated Dec. 4, 2007, 13 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, dated Oct. 9, 2008, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, dated Jul. 17, 2008, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, dated Mar. 29, 2007, 8 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, dated Oct. 26, 2006, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, dated Sep. 20, 2007, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Feb. 26, 2010, 11 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Jul. 29, 2010, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Jun. 20, 2012, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Nov. 29, 2012, 6 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,102, dated Sep. 7, 2011, 8 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,663, dated Oct. 22, 2012, 12 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052, dated Aug. 22, 2013, 15 pages.
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103 dated Apr. 9, 2014, 5 pages.
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103 dated Jul. 31, 2013, 8 pages.
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769 dated Apr. 21, 2014, 18 pages.
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052 dated Dec. 23, 2013, 7 pages.
Pessi et al., On the Relationship Between Lightning and Convective Rainfall Over the Central Pacific Ocean, date unknown, 9 pages.
Robinson et al., En Route Weather Depiction Benefits of the Nexrad Vertically Integrated Liquid Water Product Utilized by the Corridor Integrated Weather System, 10th Conference on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace Meteorology (ARAM), 2002, 4 pages.
Stormscope Lightning Detection Systems, L3 Avionics Systems, retrieved on Jul. 11, 2011, 6 pages.
TOA Technology, printed from website: http://www.toasystems.com/technology.html on Dec. 29, 2010, 2 pages.
Triangulation, from Wikipedia, printed from website: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangulation on Dec. 29, 2010, 6 pages.
U.S. Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052 dated Mar. 27, 2014, 6 pages.
U.S. Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,239 dated Jun. 16, 2016.
U.S. Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,651 dated Jun. 23, 2016.
Waldvogel et al., The Kinetic Energy of Hailfalls. Part I: Hailstone Spectra, Journal of Applied Meteorology, Apr. 1978, 8 pages.
Wilson et al., The Complementary Use of Titan-Derived Radar and Total Lightning Thunderstorm Cells, paper presented on Oct. 16, 2005, 10 pages.
Zipser et al., The Vertical Profile of Radar Reflectivity and Convective Cells: A Strong Indicator of Storm Intensity and Lightning Probability? America Meteorological Society, 1994, 9 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,239, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 17 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,651, dated Dec. 8, 2016, 14 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,034, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,034 dated Mar. 24, 2017. 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/213,256 dated Apr. 27, 2018. 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/162,035 dated Jul. 11, 2016, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,239, dated Feb. 24, 2017, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,034 dated Jun. 23, 2016, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/465,753, dated Apr. 4, 2016, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/137,645 dated Aug. 8, 2016, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,239 dated Aug. 31, 2017. 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,034 dated Jul. 13, 2017. 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,844, dated Jun. 22, 2016, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,651, dated Mar. 3, 2017, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/465,753, dated Aug. 29, 2016, 8 pages.
Entry for the word, “gradient” at Britannica Academic, at academic.eb.com. Accessed on Oct. 16, 2018. (Year:2018).
Entry for the word, “gradient” at Wolfram MathWorld, at mathworld.wolfram.com. Accessed on Oct. 16, 2018. (Year:2018).
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/213,256 dated Oct. 19, 2018. 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/213,256 dated Jan. 11, 2019.