In many well applications, downhole tool operation can be susceptible to a variety of parameters which limit the tool with respect to performance of the function for which the tool was designed. For example, tools deployed downhole via wireline can become stuck due to differential sticking or other causes. In tool differential sticking, the differential pressure between the borehole and the formation creates a normal force which effectively causes the downhole tool to adhere to the borehole wall. The tool becomes stuck when the maximum safe wireline cable pull is less than the force sufficient to move the tool axially in the borehole. However, a variety of other factors can limit the movement or progression of a tool in a downhole application.
In general, a system and methodology are provided for inducing oscillations downhole to facilitate a function of a downhole tool. A tool is initially conveyed downhole and operated to perform a function that relates to a downhole application. The operational efficiency of the tool is improved by creating oscillations which vibrate the tool to achieve a desired result, e.g. freeing the tool from a stuck position.
However, many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this disclosure. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the claims.
Certain embodiments of the disclosure will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying figures illustrate the various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various technologies described herein, and:
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of some embodiments of the present disclosure. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the system and/or methodology may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.
The present disclosure generally relates to a system and methodology for inducing oscillating forces downhole to facilitate a function of a downhole tool. In a given downhole application, a tool is initially conveyed downhole and operated to perform a function. The operational efficiency of the tool is improved by creating oscillations which vibrate the tool to achieve a desired result. For example, the oscillations may be used to free a stuck tool deployed by a wireline and/or to enhance a drilling function or other function of a downhole tool.
In wireline applications, for example, tools are deployed downhole via wireline and such tools are prone to becoming stuck in the wellbore. In some applications, the wireline tool may become stuck due to differential sticking which results from differential pressure between the wellbore and the surrounding formation, thus creating a normal force that effectively causes the tool to adhere to the borehole wall. Sometimes the wireline tool also may become stuck due to key-seating, friction with a borehole restriction, or other causes that inhibit movement of the wireline tool downhole. The wireline cable itself also can become stuck via similar causes. By inducing suitable oscillating forces to create a larger net peak force, the wireline tool and wireline may be freed for continued movement along the wellbore. The oscillating force or forces may also induce vibration in the wireline tool and the wireline, which may assist in freeing or unsticking the wireline tool. Further, the induced vibration may help de-stabilize and/or fluidize a mud cake layer formed between the wireline tool and the wellbore, which may result from such differential sticking. The oscillating force may be applied or induced in a continuous manner or the oscillating force may be applied as a periodic force, wherein the force is induced in a periodic manner.
The induced oscillations also may be employed to enhance the efficiency of other types of applications, e.g. to enhance a desired movement of a downhole tool. By way of example, the induced oscillating forces may be used in cutting operations, e.g. drilling or milling operations, to enhance a function, e.g. to enhance the rate of penetration and/or to reduce friction with the surrounding wellbore wall. The reduced friction can be used to increase reach and to improve load transfer to the tool, e.g. cutting bit. The oscillations may be induced by a vibrator used in cooperation with wireline cable. However, some applications may utilize the vibrator and the induced oscillating forces with other types of conveyances.
Referring generally to
Referring to
By way of example, conveyance 44 may comprise a wireline 50, such as a single strand wireline, e.g. slickline, or a cable wireline, e.g. a cable wireline having insulated communication lines (electrical and/or optical communication lines or the like) disposed within a braided cable. The conveyance 44 may also comprise coiled tubing or jointed pipe or the like. In the example illustrated, the downhole tool 40 has become stuck against a sidewall of wellbore 42 by, for example, differential sticking caused by creation of a normal force 52. Consequently, the maximum safe cable pull is less than the force sufficient to move the tool axially along the wellbore 42. However, the oscillating forces caused by vibrator 46, as represented by arrows 54, create a sufficiently large net peak force to free the downhole tool 40 when the induced oscillation forces acting on downhole tool 40 are in phase with a pull force 56 applied to wireline 50. It should be noted downhole tool 40 may comprise a variety of wellbore tools, including cutting tools used to operate a cutting bit 58, e.g. a drilling or milling bit. The downhole tool 40 may comprise sensors disposed therein, such as pressure, temperature, vibration sensors or the like for gathering measurements from the tool 40 or vibrator 46. The tool 40 may be configured to communicate measurements from the sensors via the conveyance 44 in communication with surface equipment or the like for analysis. The communicated measurements may be utilized for monitoring and/or optimizing the performance and/or the operation of the tool 40 and/or the vibrator 46, such as by making adjustment in tool operation or vibrator operation or the like.
The oscillations induced by vibrator 46 may be caused by a variety of mechanisms and techniques depending on the parameters of a given downhole application. For example, the vibrations/oscillations may be generated by combining a coil and magnet or by utilizing a plurality of coils. In some applications, a motor may be used to rotate an eccentric mass or to rotate a cam mechanism. In other applications, a piezoelectric system, such as a stack of piezoelectric devices, may be used to induce oscillations. Fluid pumps, such as hydraulic pumps, also may be used to induce the oscillations. Sometimes the oscillations may be induced via acoustic impulses created by chemical charges or other types of charges. These and other techniques may be used alone or in combination to provide the desired oscillations/vibrations acting against downhole tool 40 to free or otherwise facilitate movement of the downhole tool 40 along the wellbore 42.
The vibrator 46 also may be operated or swept through a range of frequencies and/or amplitudes. Varying the frequency, for example, allows the system to be tuned to reach or approach resonance where the net force applied will be at a peak value. The resonant frequency can vary based on several criteria, including tool geometry and mass, borehole geometry, temperature, pressure, borehole fluid properties such as density and viscosity, mud cake properties such a shear strength, thickness and acoustic properties, and the position of the tool relative to the borehole geometry. However, the frequency of the oscillations induced by the vibrator 46 can be continually adjusted or swept to move the oscillations toward the resonant frequency of the system. It should be noted that the resonant properties of the system will vary as the downhole tool 40 becomes free, i.e. unstuck, or as the system becomes partially free. The unstuck portion will tend to have a higher frequency but as more of the tool 40 peels away and becomes free the resonant frequency will be reduced. However, the ability to adjust vibrator 46 to change this frequency enables the effects of the induced oscillations acting on the downhole tool 40 to be enhanced. Variations in the amplitude of the oscillations (e.g. variations in oscillation amplitude from low amplitude to high amplitude) also may be used to facilitate movement of the downhole tool 40 in a desired, longitudinal direction.
In some applications, control over the induced oscillations acting on downhole tool 40 can be better controlled by placing the vibrator 46 near a longitudinal end, e.g. the illustrated top end, of the downhole tool 40. In this type of embodiment, the vibrator 46 may be designed with a smaller diameter than the downhole tool 40 to help position the vibrator 46 away from the surrounding wall of wellbore 42. This allows the vibrator 46 to vibrate freely and with a higher Q factor than it would have if it were touching the wellbore wall.
Referring generally to
The vibrator 46 may have a variety of constructions, embodiments of which are described herein, and may be oriented to induce a variety of oscillating forces 54. As illustrated in
Referring generally to
In the embodiment illustrated in
Referring generally to
As illustrated in
Referring generally to
In
Referring generally to
In the example illustrated in
A similar embodiment is illustrated in
Referring generally to
In some applications, the pressure pulse system may be positioned at a surface location 48 and may be designed to direct pressure pulses down through the wellbore for action against downhole tool 40. Surface pressure pulse systems may be designed to improve delivery of the oscillating forces 54 by modeling of the wave propagation and/or by pulsing at an appropriate frequency and pulse width to establish a standing wave which is effective without being damaging. Additionally, modeling of the tubing forces and matching of the measured surface forces and/or downhole forces may be employed to tune the frequency and amplitude for optimum effect.
An example of a surface pressure pulse system is illustrated schematically in
Surface pressure pulser 172 may have a variety of configurations. For example, the pressure pulser 172 may comprise a motor 182 driving a rotating plate 184 via a driveshaft 186, as illustrated in
Referring generally to
In
Referring generally to
In
In
As described herein, the devices and systems used to create the oscillating forces 54 may have a variety of configurations and may be designed to deliver a variety of oscillating forces. For example, the propagation of forces to the downhole tool 40 may be through direct impact or through reaction with other components or systems. The direction of the oscillating forces may be longitudinal, orthogonal, torsional, or various combinations of these forces. The vibrator mechanisms used to provide the oscillating forces may be hydraulic, mechanical, electromechanical, e.g. electromagnetic, other types of mechanisms, or various combinations of these mechanisms. With electromagnetic mechanisms, the magnetic flux direction may be transverse, longitudinal, or oriented in another suitable direction. The various mechanical and/or electromechanical arrangements may comprise motors combined with cams, eccentric masses, hydraulic systems, piezoelectric systems, and other suitable systems. Electromechanical systems utilizing stators may be designed with inner stators or outer stators to induce appropriate oscillations and resulting oscillating forces. The vibrator mechanisms also may be selectively controlled to deliver the oscillating forces with varying frequencies and/or varying amplitudes by controlling the electrical power, the mechanical power, and/or the hydraulic power supplied to the mechanisms.
Depending on the parameters of a given application, the various pulsing devices and systems described herein may be combined with wireline and many of those systems may be deployed downhole with the downhole tool 40. In some applications, the inducement of oscillating forces may be accomplished by surface devices which deliver hydraulic pulses or other types of oscillating forces downhole to a desired location. Although many of the embodiments described herein are very useful with wireline deployed tools, at least some of the embodiments may be used with coiled tubing or other conveyances. Additionally, the systems and methodology for creating the oscillating forces may be used with a variety of downhole tools to facilitate and enhance movement of the tool at a downhole location.
Although a few embodiments of the disclosure have been described in detail above, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this disclosure. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/722,992, filed Dec. 20, 2012, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1612889 | Smith | Jan 1927 | A |
2911192 | Boucher | Nov 1959 | A |
3076153 | Rieckman | Jan 1963 | A |
3155163 | Bodine, Jr. | Nov 1964 | A |
3307636 | Le Blanc | Mar 1967 | A |
3703104 | Tamplen | Nov 1972 | A |
3810425 | Post | May 1974 | A |
3976132 | Harper, Jr. | Aug 1976 | A |
4384625 | Roper et al. | May 1983 | A |
4497381 | Dickinson, III et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4574888 | Vogen | Mar 1986 | A |
4576229 | Brown | Mar 1986 | A |
4629012 | Schuh | Dec 1986 | A |
4658901 | Alexander | Apr 1987 | A |
4667742 | Bodine | May 1987 | A |
4736797 | Restarick et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4776397 | Akkerman | Oct 1988 | A |
4890682 | Worrall et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4913234 | Bodine | Apr 1990 | A |
5117685 | Goldschild | Jun 1992 | A |
5309405 | Brett et al. | May 1994 | A |
5448911 | Mason | Sep 1995 | A |
5454420 | Snider et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5469925 | Mueller et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5785125 | Royer | Jul 1998 | A |
6009948 | Flanders et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6079505 | Pignard et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6135206 | Gano et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6152222 | Kyllingstad | Nov 2000 | A |
6412560 | Bernat | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439318 | Eddison et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464014 | Bernat | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6497290 | Misselbrook et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6550536 | Bernat | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6571870 | Zheng et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6845818 | Tutuncu et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6907927 | Zheng et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7139219 | Kollé et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7219726 | Zheng et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225887 | Kriesels | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7293614 | Rose | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7458267 | McCoy | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7575051 | Stoesz et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7637321 | Zazovsky et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7690423 | Del Campo et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7703318 | Jacobson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708088 | Allahar et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7757793 | Voronin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7849924 | Surjaatmadja et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7874362 | Coates et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7894297 | Nutt et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8039422 | Al-Zahrani | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8042623 | Quernheim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8636062 | Fripp et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8714269 | Brennan, III | May 2014 | B2 |
20010040379 | Schultz | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20050092484 | Evans | May 2005 | A1 |
20050155758 | Webb et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050178558 | Kolle et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050230101 | Zheng et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050257931 | Mody et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050284624 | Libby et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060054315 | Newman | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060101914 | McCoy | May 2006 | A1 |
20060185905 | Haughom | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070024126 | Brennvall | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070256828 | Birchak et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070289778 | Watkins | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080073085 | Lovell et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080099245 | Hall | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115972 | Lynde et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080251254 | Lynde et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090166026 | Akselberg | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090260822 | Stoesz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090314486 | Castro | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100276204 | Connell et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110036560 | Vail, III | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110120772 | McLoughlin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110139445 | Fripp et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110139510 | Declute-Melancon | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110180265 | Shand | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110203395 | Pfahlert | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110267922 | Shampine et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120018145 | Wheater et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120024539 | Lehr | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120031609 | Wheater et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120048621 | Stewart et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120132289 | Kolle | May 2012 | A1 |
20120186808 | Lively et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120241219 | Wiercigroch | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120318531 | Shampine et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130061742 | Brennan, III | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130062075 | Brennan | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130160991 | Gregory et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130186619 | Wicks et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130199794 | Lane et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140069639 | Mackenzie et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140174722 | Christie et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140251639 | Jewett | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150034336 | Morrison et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2275342 | Aug 1994 | GB |
2315788 | Feb 1998 | GB |
9735093 | Sep 1997 | WO |
2004072437 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2010125405 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011005144 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Castaneda, et al., “Coiled Tubing Milling Operations: Successful Application of an Innovative Variable Water Hammer Extended-Reach BHA to Improve End Load Efficiencies of a PDM in Horizontal Wells”, SPE 143346—SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference & Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, Apr. 5-6, 2011, pp. 1-19. |
Dupriest, et al., “Design Methodology and Operation Practices Eliminate Differential Sticking”, SPE 128129—IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2010, pp. 1-13. |
Newman, “Vibration and Rotation Considerations in Extending Coiled-Tubing Reach”, SPE 106979—SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A., 2007, pp. 1-9. |
Parry, “Numerical Prediction Method for Growth and Deformation of Filter Cakes”, Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 128, Nov. 2006, pp. 1259-1265. |
Robertson, et al., “Dynamic Excitation Tool: Developmental Testing and CTD Field Case Histories”, SPE 89519—SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, Mar. 23-24, 2004, pp. 1-16. |
Sherwood, “Differential pressure sticking of drill string”, AlChE Journal, vol. 44, No. 3, Mar. 1998, pp. 711-721. |
Sola, “New Downhole Tool for Coiled Tubing Extended Reach”, SPE 60701—SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, Texas, Apr. 5-6, 2000, 8 pages. |
Stoesz, et al., “Low-Frequency Downhole Vibration Technology Applied to Fishing Operations”, SPE 63129—SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 2000, pp. 1-7. |
Gonzalez et al., “Stuck Coiled-Tubing Recovery Utilizing Surface Equipment and Methods”, SPE130342, SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibtion held in The Woodlands, Texas, Mar. 23-24, 2010, 7 pages. |
Joppe et al., “Using High-Frequency Downhold Vibration Technology to Enhance Through-Tubing Fishing and Workover Operations”, SPE 99415, SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibtion, 2006, 4 pages. |
Office Action issued in the RU application 2014134066 dated Jun. 29, 2016 (9 pages). |
Office Action issued in the RU application 2014134066 dated Sep. 16, 2016 (9 pages). |
Decision on Grant for RU Application No. 2014134066, dated Apr. 21, 2017 with English Translation, (12 pages). |
Examination Report issued in the CA application 2861839, dated Sep. 3, 2019 (3 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2013/073223 dated Mar. 26, 2014 (12 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US2013/073223 dated Jun. 23, 2015 (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2013/020118 dated Apr. 12, 2013 (10 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US2013/020118 dated Jul. 31, 2014 (7 pages). |
Dictionary Definition of “groove” accessed Jun. 25, 2015 via www.merriam-Webster.com (4 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170030158 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13722992 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 15291102 | US |