A portion of the disclosure of this patent document and its figures contain material subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document, but otherwise reserves all copyrights whatsoever.
The present invention generally relates to providing haptic feedback to user interface devices. The present invention more particularly relates to providing haptic feedback for a rotational touchpad.
Designers and manufacturers of hand-held devices, such as personal digital assistants, cell phones, and MP3 players are constantly striving to improve the interfaces of these devices. One relatively recent innovation has been the introduction of the touchpad. The touchpad has become a common feature of conventional laptops and has begun to appear in hand-held devices as well.
One such hand-held device is a personal MP3 player. Conventional MP3 players and other such devices include a circular touchpad, which is used to navigate menus, lists, and other user interface elements. The user interfaces may also include various other elements, including conventional buttons.
Embodiments of the present invention provide systems and methods for providing rotational haptic feedback. One embodiment provides haptic cues to a touch-sensitive input device having a rotary degree of freedom. One such embodiment comprises a touch sensitive input device is configured to move in a rotary degree of freedom, and an actuator configured to produce a rotational force on the touch-sensitive input device.
In one embodiment, the actuator comprises an electromagnetic core configured to produce force on a magnet affixed to the touch-sensitive input device. In other embodiments, a motor provides the rotational force. For example, in one embodiment, the motor drives a belt. The belt is configured to rotate the touch-sensitive input device. In another embodiment, the motor drives a flexure, which is configured to rotate the touch-sensitive input device.
Further details and advantages of embodiments of the present invention are set forth below.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention are better understood when the following Detailed Description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Embodiments of the present invention include systems and methods for providing rotational haptic feedback. One embodiment includes a circular touchpad activated by a moving magnet actuator. Other embodiments include small motors attached to a user interface element to provide a rotational vibrotactile sensation. These and other embodiments are described below.
Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals indicate like elements throughout the several figures,
Capacitance-based touchpads are well known to those skilled in the art, and therefore, only a basic description of their function is provided herein. A capacitance touchpad, such as touchpad 102 shown in
The touchpad 102 also provides a pseudo pressure, Z. The pseudo pressure is based on the amount of capacitance resulting from the conductor touching the touchpad 102. Accordingly, the amount of capacitance is not a direct measure of pressure but rather a pseudo pressure.
The personal MP3 player shown in
The processor executes computer-executable program instructions stored in memory. Such processors may include a microprocessor, an ASIC, and state machines. Such processors include, or may be in communication with, media, for example computer-readable media, which stores instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the steps described herein. Embodiments of computer-readable media include, but are not limited to, an electronic, optical, magnetic, or other storage or transmission device capable of providing a processor, such as the processor 110 of client 102a, with computer-readable instructions. Other examples of suitable media include, but are not limited to, a floppy disk, CD-ROM, DVD, magnetic disk, memory chip, ROM, RAM, an ASIC, a configured processor, all optical media, all magnetic tape or other magnetic media, or any other medium from which a computer processor can read instructions. Also, various other forms of computer-readable media may transmit or carry instructions to a computer, including a router, private or public network, or other transmission device or channel, both wired and wireless. The instructions may comprise code from any computer-programming language, including, for example, C, C++, C#, Visual Basic, Java, Python, and JavaScript.
Referring still to
An embodiment of the present invention may utilize any type of touch-sensitive input device, such as the touchpad 102 described above, a touch panel, or other device. The input device may be of any shape, including round and rectangular shapes. The input device is configured to move in a rotary degree of freedom. An actuator is configured to produce a rotational force on the touch-sensitive input device.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the range of motion in the rotary degree of freedom is limited. To achieve the limitation, either the motor or the input device comprises means for limiting motion in the rotary degree of freedom. For example, in one embodiment, the motor comprises two rubber end stops at each limit of rotation. In another embodiment, the touch-sensitive input device includes end stops to limit its range of motion.
Various types of actuators may be utilized in an embodiment of the present invention. For example, in one embodiment, the touch-sensitive input device comprises one or more magnets and the actuator comprises a magnetic core, such as an E-core. When the magnetic core is energized, the core produces a rotational force on the input device.
In another embodiment, a motor provides the rotational force. In one such embodiment, the motor drives a belt, which is configured to produce the rotational force directly or indirectly on the input device. In another embodiment, the motor is connected to a flexure, such as a brass flexure, which produces rotational force on the input device.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the freedom of movement of the touch-sensitive input device serves to increase the effectiveness of a vibration imparted on the input device. By isolating the input device from the housing or other ground, the input device is able to move more freely in the rotary degree of freedom when vibrated. In one such embodiment, the actuator comprises an eccentric rotating mass mounted on a motor.
An embodiment of the present invention may perform various methods. For example, in one embodiment, the processor receives an input signal and, in response, generates an output signal configured to cause an actuator to produce a rotational force on the touch-sensitive input device. In one such embodiment, the output signal is configured to impart a “pop” sensation on the input device.
Referring again to
In the embodiment shown in
The touchpad 102 in
The bushing 104 or other support preferably offers stability combined with low friction. In the embodiment shown in
In other embodiments, the bushing 104 may be replaced with linkages or alternative pivots to allow the touchpad 102 to react the forces. An embodiment may utilize roller elements or balls to support the magnets against the fixed steel to maintain the optimal gap. In one embodiment, the touchpad 102 does not include a center hole. Such an embodiment may eliminate physical switches and implement buttons, including the center button, as virtual buttons. The touchpad 102 may also include additional distinct regions anywhere on its surface to represent buttons. By utilizing a rotational movement for a circular touchpad, the embodiment shown in
Preferably the rotation of the touchpad 102 is limited to optimize the haptic cue. A user experiences a haptic cue optimally when the user is unaware of the actual movement of the user interface and instead feels only the cue itself In one embodiment, a pin 122 is attached to the touchpad 102. The pin sits in a slot 124 in the button carrier 106. The slot is parallel to the touchpad 102 so that when the touchpad 102 rotates, the pin travels within the slot. In a preferred embodiment, the slot has a length of 2 millimeters. An approximately 2-millimeter stroke is preferred for providing a haptic cue without a user realizing that the touchpad 102 is rotating. This small displacement occurs in response to an actuator and the rotation is felt by the user as a real time haptic cue synchronized with the user interface display events.
Self-centering of the touchpad 102 is also preferable in an embodiment of the present invention. The actuator 111 shown provides self-centering in the form of a high reluctance torque, which is also referred to as “cogging.” The natural tendency of the actuator 111 to spring center itself keeps the system near equilibrium and prevents the finger dragging force from rotating the touchpad 102 to one limit stop where only half of a waveform defining a haptic cue would be felt. Other embodiments may realize such spring centering with the addition of springs; however, the addition of springs would add additional resistance that would have to be overcome by the output force of the actuator 111.
The bushing 104 also has an opening in the middle. The opening allows the bushing to be situated around a central button 106 of a button carrier 108. The button carrier 108 of the embodiment shown supports conventional buttons. In other embodiments, the button carrier 108 may be constructed to accommodate other button types. A button cap 110 snaps onto the central button 108 and secures the bushing 104 and the touchpad 102.
As described above, the bushing 104 allows the touchpad 102 to rotate. An actuator in communication with the touchpad 102 provides force to rotate the touchpad 104 and produce a haptic effect. The actuator in the embodiment shown in
In such an embodiment, the stationary steel may be formed into distinct shapes to fit in various locations in a preexisting device design without affecting the stationary steel's ability to create a magnetic field. Such an embodiment may include various shapes and be implemented in various positions within a device.
The actuator includes a backing plate 112. In the embodiment shown, the backing plate 112 is made from steel. Attached to the backing plate 112 is a two-pole magnet 114. The two-pole magnet 114 may comprise a single, curved two-pole magnet or a series of smaller magnets arranged to form a two-pole magnet. However, the two-pole magnet 114, may be created using a series of smaller magnets as is shown in
In the embodiment shown in
The E-Core 116 is mounted in the embodiment such that the poles of the E-Core maintain an optimal gap from the magnet 114 mounted on the backing 116. Therefore, when the E-Core 116 emits a magnetic field, the magnet 114 moves. And since the magnet is attached to the backing plate 112, which is attached to the touchpad 102, the touchpad 102 moves as well. The structure is arranged such that the magnet 114, and thus the touchpad 102, moves rotationally when the actuator 111 is activated. A controller (not shown) controls the magnetic field precisely so that the movement approximates a waveform, which is interpreted by the user of the touchpad 102 as a specific vibrotactile effect.
An embodiment of the present invention is particularly advantageous for providing haptic feedback in small devices, such as a personal digital assistant (PDA), cell phone, or MP3 player. Such devices conventionally include circular touchpads such as the touchpad 102 shown in
Such a device may be created by adding a processor (not shown) and firmware to the embodiment shown in
The amplifier may be, for example, a DC or AC-coupled audio amplifiers. However, an AC-coupled audio amplifier may be preferable in many environments because of the relatively low cost, the availability of off-the-shelf components, and the ability to use a larger range of coil resistance than is practical for a DC-coupled amplifier. Also, the AC-coupled amplifier may be bypassed with large capacitance values to permit very high peak root-mean-square (RMS) currents while preventing accidental overheating.
Various other embodiments of the present invention are capable of providing force feedback in rotational interface elements. These embodiments are capable of implementation in a small device, such as an MP3 player, a personal digital assistant (PDA), or a digital camera. The actuator in small devices is preferably 6 mm or less in height and requires low RMS current on the order of 150-200 mA.
The motor 504 includes an eccentric mass. The eccentric mass and all of the windings and additional components of the motor operate within that volume. The motor 504 naturally produces a vibration of approximately 80 hz. However, in the embodiment shown, the motor is driven bi-directionally to create frequencies greater than 80 Hz.
The motor 504 is attached to the underside of the touchpad 500 and rotates in the same plane as the touchpad 500 rotates. The motor rotation is limited. Two rubber end-stops 506a, b limit the rotation of the motor 504. Preferably, the rotation of the touchpad 500 is limited. In the embodiment shown, since the rotation of the motor 504 is limited and the motor 504 is attached to the touchpad 500, the rotation of the touchpad 500 is limited as well.
The embodiment shown in
The use of the embodiment shown in
The embodiment shown in
The embodiment shown in
An embodiment such as the one shown in
Various modifications of the embodiment shown in
The bend 810 in the brass flexure 808 provides a degree of freedom necessary to rotate the touchpad 800 from side-to-side using a pinion 806 rotating up and down. A metal flexure is preferable to a plastic flexure in a small device. The range of rotation of the touchpad 800 is preferably limited.
The embodiment shown in
An embodiment of the present invention includes processing logic. The processing logic may be in the form on computer program code stored in a computer-readable-medium, such as a programmable read-only memory (ROM). Processing logic so stored is often referred to as firmware. Firmware according to the present invention accepts parameters regarding the context in which the user is operating as well as user interface parameters to determine the type of haptic effect to create. The firmware may perform other tasks as well.
Referring to
The embodiment shown in
Various types of effects may be created to effectively provide haptic cues in an embodiment of the present invention. One embodiment features a “tink” effect on detent change; a “tonk” effect on screen scroll; a “thunk” effect on last item in list; a “pang-ping” effect on new list, a falling frequency on low battery or power down; a “tick-tick” indication when cursor lands on a parent; and a “bleep” effect when a button is pressed.
The effect generator module 1020 computes the effect. The force module 1022 performs the interface functionality between the computed force value and the micro-controller peripheral that writes the computed force to the actuator and associated electronics. The force module 1022 supports an enabling line, a direction line and a pulse width modulation (PWM) line. The PWM module 1024 is a hardware-dependent module that writes the computed force values to the actuator and/or electronics. The firmware controls the instantaneous current through the coil by modulating the duty cycle of a high frequency pulse train, typically 10-40 KHz. The module 1024 supports each of the lines specified in the force module 1022 even if a corresponding action is not available. Supporting the additional lines provides flexibility and portability.
In the process illustrated in
If the data indicates that the user has entered a new list 1112, firmware causes a new list effect to be played 1114. Playing the effect immediately upon determining the state of the interface is synchronous processing. If the data does not indicate that a new list has been entered, the firmware determines whether the position has changed, i.e., is the position delta greater than zero 1116. If so, the firmware determines whether the end-of-list has been reached 1118. If yes, the firmware causes the end list effect to be played 1120. If the end-of-list has not been reached, the firmware determines whether a scroll event has occurred 1124. If so, the firmware causes a scroll effect to be played 1126, and if not, a detent effect to be played 1128. When the firmware completes the list processing 1106, it begins the haptic processing 1108.
The firmware first checks for a low battery state 1130. If the battery is low, the firmware causes the low battery effect to be played 1132 and ends the process 1110. If not, the firmware determines whether a parent effect should be played 1134. If so, the firmware causes a parent effect to be played 1136 and ends the process 1110. If not, the firmware determines whether a button effect should be played 1138. If so, the firmware causes a button effect to be played 1140 and ends the process 1110. If no button effect is to be played, the firmware ends the process 1110.
The asynchronous process illustrated in
To effectively perform the processing logic illustrated in
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented only for the purpose of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Numerous modifications and adaptations thereof will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/419,984 filed Oct. 20, 2002, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2972140 | Hirsch | Feb 1961 | A |
3157853 | Hirsch | Nov 1964 | A |
3220121 | Cutler | Nov 1965 | A |
3497668 | Hirsch | Feb 1970 | A |
3517446 | Corlyon et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3623064 | Kagan | Nov 1971 | A |
3902687 | Hightower | Sep 1975 | A |
3903614 | Diamond et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3911416 | Feder | Oct 1975 | A |
4127752 | Lowthorp | Nov 1978 | A |
4160508 | Frosch et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4236325 | Hall et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4262549 | Schwellenbach | Apr 1981 | A |
4333070 | Barnes | Jun 1982 | A |
4464117 | Forest | Aug 1984 | A |
4484191 | Vavra | Nov 1984 | A |
4513235 | Acklam et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4581491 | Boothroyd | Apr 1986 | A |
4599070 | Hladky et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4708656 | De Vries et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4713007 | Alban | Dec 1987 | A |
4758165 | Tieman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4772205 | Chlumsky et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4794392 | Selinko | Dec 1988 | A |
4885565 | Embach | Dec 1989 | A |
4891764 | McIntosh | Jan 1990 | A |
4926879 | Sevrain et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930770 | Baker | Jun 1990 | A |
4934694 | McIntosh | Jun 1990 | A |
5019761 | Kraft | May 1991 | A |
5022384 | Freels | Jun 1991 | A |
5022407 | Horch et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035242 | Franklin | Jul 1991 | A |
5038089 | Szakaly | Aug 1991 | A |
5078152 | Bond | Jan 1992 | A |
5121091 | Fujiyama | Jun 1992 | A |
5165897 | Johnson | Nov 1992 | A |
5175459 | Danial et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5185561 | Good et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186695 | Mangseth et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5212473 | Louis | May 1993 | A |
5240417 | Smithson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5271290 | Fischer | Dec 1993 | A |
5275174 | Cook | Jan 1994 | A |
5283970 | Aigner | Feb 1994 | A |
5299810 | Pierce | Apr 1994 | A |
5302132 | Corder | Apr 1994 | A |
5309140 | Everett, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5334027 | Wherlock | Aug 1994 | A |
5389849 | Asano et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5436622 | Gutman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437607 | Taylor | Aug 1995 | A |
5461711 | Wang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466213 | Hogan | Nov 1995 | A |
5547382 | Yamasaki | Aug 1996 | A |
5575761 | Hajianpour | Nov 1996 | A |
5600777 | Wang et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5638060 | Kataoka et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5719561 | Gonzales | Feb 1998 | A |
5736978 | Hasser et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766016 | Slnclair | Jun 1998 | A |
5785630 | Bobick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5887995 | Holehan | Mar 1999 | A |
5917906 | Thronton | Jun 1999 | A |
5936613 | Jaeger et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5977867 | Blouin | Nov 1999 | A |
6008800 | Pryor | Dec 1999 | A |
6067081 | Hahlganss et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081536 | Gorsuch et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111577 | Zilles et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118435 | Fujita et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128006 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140987 | Stein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151332 | Gorsuch et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160489 | Perry et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6198206 | Saarmaa et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211861 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215778 | Lomp et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218966 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219034 | Elbing et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225980 | Weiss et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236647 | Amalfitano | May 2001 | B1 |
6243080 | Molne | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262717 | Donohue et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283859 | Carlson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307465 | Kayama et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326901 | Gonzales | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337678 | Fish | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6373463 | Beeks | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388655 | Leung | May 2002 | B1 |
6388999 | Gorsuch et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6414674 | Kamper et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422941 | Thorner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429846 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6445284 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469695 | White | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487421 | Hess et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6509892 | Kamper et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518958 | Miyajima et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535201 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6628195 | Coudon | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636202 | Ishmael, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639582 | Shrader | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647145 | Gay | Nov 2003 | B1 |
7046230 | Zadesky et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20010035854 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020033795 | Shahoian et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020149561 | Fukumoto et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149570 | Knowles et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156807 | Dieberger | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030006892 | Church | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016211 | Woolley | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022701 | Gupta | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025679 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030030628 | Sato et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038776 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048260 | Matusis | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058265 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067449 | Yoshikawa et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071795 | Baldauf et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095105 | Vaananen | May 2003 | A1 |
20030128191 | Strasser et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030128192 | van Os | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151597 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174121 | Poupyrev et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179190 | Franzen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040233159 | Badarneh | Nov 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0349086 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0556999 | May 1998 | EP |
1182851 | Feb 2002 | EP |
01-003664 | Jul 1990 | JP |
02-109714 | Jan 1992 | JP |
04-007371 | Aug 1993 | JP |
05-193862 | Jan 1995 | JP |
2001-350592 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-259059 | Sep 2002 | JP |
9718546 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9949443 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0212991 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0227645 | Apr 2002 | WO |
0231807 | Apr 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040178989 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60419984 | Oct 2002 | US |