1. The Field of the Invention
The invention relates to orthopaedics, and more particularly, to systems and methods for providing access to the spine to facilitate various implantation procedures.
2. The Relevant Technology
Many spinal orthopaedic procedures including discectomy, implantation of motion preservation devices, total disk replacement, and implantation of interbody devices require unimpeded access to a targeted portion of the spinal column. A lateral interbody fusion approach requires the patient to be turned mid-process to complete the disc and interbody device procedures. An anterior approach requires the presence of a vascular surgeon or highly experienced general surgeon, due to the risk of injury to vascular anatomy. Accordingly, there is a need in the art for systems and methods that facilitate access to the spine, thereby simplifying surgical procedures and expediting patient recovery.
Various embodiments of the present invention will now be discussed with reference to the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope.
The present invention relates to systems and methods for accessing intervertebral space and inserting spine implants between vertebral bodies. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the following description is merely illustrative of the principles of the invention, which may be applied in various ways to provide many different alternative embodiments. This description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of this invention and is not meant to limit the inventive concepts in the appended claims.
The present invention provides access to the spine through the use of a postero-lateral approach. A minimally invasive dilation and/or access device employing such an approach would have significant advantages in spinal orthopaedic procedures over the lateral and anterior approaches. These advantages may include avoiding the need to turn the patient during surgery, less muscle retraction, less blood loss, less operating room time, minimized damage to the vascular system, organs, nerves and muscles, faster recovery, and an improved overall outcome for the patient.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
A distal end 61 of the shaft 60 has a first side 62 and a second side 63. Extending transversely through the distal end 61 from the first side 62 to the second side 63 is a screw channel 66. On the first side 62, an interface surface 65 has a radial spline 64 which encircles the opening of the screw channel 66. The radial spline 64 is configured to mate with the radial spline 48 on the targeting post 12 when the post is connected to the support arm 20. Extending through the channel 66 is a thumb screw 68, and a shaft 70 protrudes from the channel 66 on the second side 63. In the preferred embodiment, shaft 70 includes an externally threaded surface configured to interface with the threaded receiving slot 46 on the targeting post 12.
Referring to
When the distal end 32 of the targeting post 12 has reached the reference location, the proximal end 30 is attached to the support arm 20 via the thumb screw 68. The protruding screw shaft 70 is threaded into the receiving slot 46. As the thumb screw 68 is threaded in, the radial splines 44, 64 mesh, locking the targeting post 12 to the support arm 20. Once attachment is made between the targeting post 12 and the support arm 20, the various degrees of freedom of the support arm 20 are locked down to provide sufficiently rigid instrument stabilization. In position adjacent to the spine, the targeting post 12 acts as a stabilizing and reference guide for subsequent cannulas, instruments and implants.
Referring to
Referring to
After the penetrating guide member 16 is attached to the guide arm 14, the guide arm 14 is rotated so that the insertion tip 113 of the guide member 16 makes contact with the skin. At this point, the guide member 16 is lifted and an incision of approximately 1-5 cm is made into the skin and fascia. As shown in
Once the guide member 16 is correctly positioned adjacent the targeted location, the guide arm 14 is detached from the guide member 16 and the targeting post 12. The guide member 16 is left in the patient to serve as a guide for one cannula or series of cannulas which are graduated in size, and which are inserted sequentially from smaller to larger to increase the cross-sectional area of the access portal to the area to be treated.
Referring to
Referring to
In one embodiment of the invention, the largest cannula 18 may have a tooth portion (not shown) which extends longitudinally from the insertion end 122. During insertion, the tooth portion is placed between the superior and inferior endplates of the intervertebral space, to assist in maintaining access to the space.
Another embodiment of the invention comprises a targeting post which is capable of cephalad-caudal adjustment.
Another embodiment of the invention further comprises an interbody device.
In any case, the bore 130 of the cannula 18 is sized to accommodate passage of the interbody device 300. Because use of the arcuate cannula assembly 10 allows improved access to the intervertebral space, the interbody device 300 may have a larger footprint than many other interbody devices, and can extend across most of the medial-lateral width of the intervertebral space, to provide for increased stability, increased bone in-growth, and improved fusion. A curved insertion tool and curved tamp (not shown) are used to insert and seat the interbody device 300 in the intervertebral space. In the alternative, a flexible insertion tool and/or a flexible tamp may be used.
The arcuate postero-lateral approach described above may have many advantages for spinal procedures, particularly procedures involving anterior vertebral column elements. This approach may be used to insert motion preservation devices, such as total disc replacements. By accessing the disc space via an arcuate postero-lateral approach, the surgeon is able to spare the anterior longitudinal ligament as well as avoid complications with the great vessels. This approach also provides for revision options with virtually the same instrumentation and implant designs by accessing the disc space from the opposite lateral side as the first surgery. This approach also allows for total disc replacement (TDR) endplate retention features which are more desirable than anterior approach TDR features, such as endplate keels or teeth which are oriented in the frontal plane to resist the high shear loads seen in the lumber spine lordotic region.
This approach may also be used for various intervertebral disc treatment or resection procedures such as annulotomy, nucleotomy, discectomy, annulus replacement, nucleus replacement, and decompression due to a bulging or extruded disc. During an annulotomy, the surgeon may provide an access portal in the manner described previously, and open and/or remove a portion or all of the disc annulus. During a nucleotomy, the surgeon may provide an access portal in the manner described previously, and open and/or resect a portion of the intervertebral disc nucleus. During a discectomy, the surgeon may remove a portion or the entire intervertebral disc through the access portal in order to accomplish decompression of the nerve roots, dura, or spinal cord. This procedure may be done as a conservative therapy to relieve patient symptoms or pain, or it may be done in preparation for total disc replacement or fusion.
For annulus repair or replacement, the arcuate postero-lateral approach may facilitate a larger needle and avoidance of complicated vascular structure and may allow a pathway for a prosthetic annulus to be placed or formed in the intervertebral space. Using a bilateral arcuate approach such as that depicted in
The arcuate postero-lateral approach may also be utilized for additional vertebral body motion segment stabilization procedures such as interbody device insertion, lateral plating, anterior plating, lateral or anterior plating with dynamic stabilization or compression elements, deformity correction, and/or graft compression devices or procedures. The arcuate postero-lateral access portal such as that depicted in
The arcuate postero-lateral approach may also be used for lateral plating procedures, in which the implanted plates may comprise fixed, dynamic, or compressive elements. This approach again allows a single patient positioning to conduct lateral plating as well as posterior stabilization hardware such as screws, hooks and rods. These plates may be used for local deformity correction or prevention procedures to treat local scoliosis, kyphosis, hyper-lordosis, or spondylolisthesis. Additionally, the arcuate postero-lateral approach may allow for novel graft compression devices or procedures that enable the surgeon to apply improved local compressive forces between vertebral bodies or an interbody device. Benefits of improved local compressive forces include improved bone graft incorporation, fusion, interbody device stability, as well as a potentially reduced risk of interbody device expulsion that is often the result of over-compressing the disc space and applying unintended moments via traditional pedicle screws and rods. Such graft compression devices include lateral plates with compression features, vertebral body staples which cooperate with the superior and inferior vertebral bodies to apply compression, and integrated interbody device with arms that cooperate with the vertebral bodies to apply compression via screws, tapered surfaces, or the like.
Various central canal or foraminal decompression procedures may be performed with the arcuate postero-lateral approach described previously. Decompression procedures are conducted to resect soft or hard tissues that may be impinging on neural elements such as the exiting nerve roots, dura, or spinal cord, resulting in various pathologies such as radiolopathy, myelopathy, pain, tingling, numbness, and loss of motor or sensory control. For example, anterior central canal decompression required due to a diseased intervertebral disc is often a difficult procedure. By using the disclosed arcuate postero-lateral approach, this decompression procedure allows for improved patient positioning, access, and patient outcomes. Foraminal decompression procedures via an arcuate postero-lateral approach may also allow the surgeon an improved trajectory and passageway to decompress the foramen.
Procedures involving the vertebral body, such as vertebral body biopsy, vertebral body height restoration, and vertebroplasty may successfully utilize the arcuate postero-lateral approach. Often patients who are experiencing symptoms associated with vertebral body disease, collapse, or fracture will undergo a biopsy of the vertebral body to assess the condition of the structure. Osteoporotic patients, especially female geriatric patients, may experience vertebral body collapse or fracture. This is an extremely painful and debilitating condition which may be addressed via vertebroplasty through the disclosed arcuate postero-lateral approach. Often, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty or arcuplasty procedures are conducted via a transpedicular approach, to inject a hardenable compound such as PMMA cement into the vertebral body to create an internal cast-like structure to stabilize the bony fragments or fractures. The arcuate postero-lateral approach has numerous advantages for such a procedure. It may allow for a larger access needle than a transpedicular approach and accordingly reduces pressure requirements for the viscous hardenable compounds. In addition, it will likely result in less post-operative pain due to not violating the pedicle, and it allows for a more preferable trajectory of the access needle. Vertebroplasties conducted via a transpedicular approach often require a bilateral approach for sufficient vertebral body stabilization. By using the trajectory of the arcuate postero-lateral approach, the surgeon or radiologist may use a single needle and single approach for a complete fill, because the access needle can be advanced to the distal portions and gradually retracted during injection to accomplish a complete fill.
Vertebral body height restoration procedures have recently been disclosed in the art to address collapsed vertebral bodies. The arcuate postero-lateral approach may facilitate such vertebral height restoration procedures by removing the size limitation imposed by the transpedicular approach. Additionally, the ability to access the lateral margins of the vertebral body may be beneficial in insertion of an implant to restore vertebral height and fix it in place via a hardenable compound, or conduct an internal vertebral body distraction and secure the vertebral body via a hardenable compound.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. For example, above are described various alternative examples of systems for accessing intervertebral space. It is appreciated that various features of the above-described examples can be mixed and matched to form a variety of other alternatives. It is also appreciated that this system should not be limited creating access to the intervertebral space. This arcuate access system may be used to obtain access to any portion of the spine. As such, the described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/856,682, filed Nov. 3, 2006, which is entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SPINAL SURGERY.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3090386 | Curtis | May 1963 | A |
3556103 | Calhoun et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3570498 | Weighton | Mar 1971 | A |
3608539 | Miller | Sep 1971 | A |
3941127 | Froning | Mar 1976 | A |
3946740 | Bassett | Mar 1976 | A |
3948274 | Zeldman et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4265231 | Scheller, Jr. et al. | May 1981 | A |
4312337 | Donohue | Jan 1982 | A |
4335715 | Kirkley | Jun 1982 | A |
4449532 | Storz | May 1984 | A |
4511356 | Froning et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4541423 | Barber | Sep 1985 | A |
4545374 | Jacobson | Oct 1985 | A |
4573448 | Kambin | Mar 1986 | A |
4598705 | Lichtenberger | Jul 1986 | A |
4686972 | Kurland | Aug 1987 | A |
4722331 | Fox | Feb 1988 | A |
4756708 | Martin | Jul 1988 | A |
4862891 | Smith | Sep 1989 | A |
4863430 | Klyce et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4883048 | Purnell et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4926860 | Stice et al. | May 1990 | A |
4957495 | Kluger | Sep 1990 | A |
5080662 | Paul | Jan 1992 | A |
5163940 | Bourque | Nov 1992 | A |
5242444 | MacMillan | Sep 1993 | A |
5300077 | Howell | Apr 1994 | A |
5330468 | Burkhart | Jul 1994 | A |
5334205 | Cain | Aug 1994 | A |
5458602 | Goble et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5601562 | Wolf et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5613971 | Lower et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5725532 | Shoemaker | Mar 1998 | A |
5741261 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5772661 | Michelson | Jun 1998 | A |
5860973 | Michelson | Jan 1999 | A |
5891147 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6042582 | Ray | Mar 2000 | A |
6080155 | Michelson | Jun 2000 | A |
6083225 | Winslow | Jul 2000 | A |
6096038 | Michelson | Aug 2000 | A |
6162170 | Foley et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6224603 | Marino | May 2001 | B1 |
6226548 | Foley et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245072 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6270498 | Michelson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6419678 | Asfora | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6530929 | Justis et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547795 | Schneiderman | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6564078 | Marino et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575899 | Foley et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6592559 | Pakter et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599320 | Kuslich et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604003 | Fredricks et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6638276 | Sharkey et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6669698 | Tromanhauser et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6733496 | Sharkey et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740090 | Cragg et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6764491 | Frey et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790210 | Cragg et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6796983 | Zucherman et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6824565 | Muhanna et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830570 | Frey et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6875219 | Arramon et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6980862 | Fredricks et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7008422 | Foley et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011660 | Sherman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
RE039133 | Clayton et al. | Jun 2006 | E |
7060068 | Tromanhauser et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060073 | Frey et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074226 | Roehm et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7325260 | Hoyt et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
20020013514 | Brau | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019637 | Frey et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020065541 | Fredricks et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091387 | Hoogland | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020156420 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161368 | Foley et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165550 | Frey et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030032929 | McGuckin | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030074005 | Roth et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083688 | Simonson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120308 | Loubens et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030191474 | Cragg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199871 | Foley et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208202 | Falahee | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229347 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015215 | Fredricks et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030346 | Frey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034351 | Sherman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068242 | McGuckin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040092928 | Sasso | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106997 | Lieberson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117020 | Frey et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133168 | Salcudean et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153005 | Krueger | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162559 | Arramon et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040199168 | Bertagnoli et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215190 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220577 | Cragg et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050021031 | Foley et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021040 | Bertagnoli | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050137605 | Assell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137612 | Assell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149035 | Pimenta et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165405 | Tsou | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171540 | Lim et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177239 | Steinberg | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187543 | Underwood et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050209610 | Carrison | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256578 | Blatt et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261773 | Ferree | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060009780 | Foley et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036241 | Siegal | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036273 | Siegal | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052848 | Fredricks et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064101 | Arramon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079908 | Lieberman | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084977 | Lieberman | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060111714 | Foley | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111728 | Abdou | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129101 | McGuckin, Jr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135915 | Tucker | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135916 | Tucker | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149278 | Abdou | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155377 | Beaurain et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060189986 | Sherman et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195102 | Malandain | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200129 | Denti | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200135 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217806 | Peterman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217807 | Peterman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229604 | Olsen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229614 | Foley et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264968 | Frey et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070093689 | Steinberg | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070203497 | Zucherman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080033563 | Khandhar et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080249531 | Patterson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090204219 | Beaurain et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2005032358 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006041963 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006089085 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007041375 | Apr 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080306481 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60856682 | Nov 2006 | US |