System and method for providing three dimensional video conferencing in a network environment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8659637
  • Patent Number
    8,659,637
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 9, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 25, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A method is provided in one example embodiment and includes receiving data indicative of a personal position of an end user. A media stream is selected from a plurality of media streams to be transmitted to the end user based on the personal position. The selected media stream includes image data of an object captured by a camera and the image data is used to construct a three-dimensional rendering of the object. In more specific embodiments, the media stream selection is executed by a server configured to be coupled to a network. The camera can be part of a plurality of cameras that capture image data associated with the object and that transmit respective media streams over a network. Once a camera begins transmitting image data over the network and to the end user, other cameras from the plurality of cameras stop transmitting their respective media streams over the network.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates in general to the field of communications and, more particularly, to providing three-dimensional video conferencing in a network environment.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Video services have become increasingly important in today's society. In certain architectures, service providers may seek to offer sophisticated video conferencing services for their end users. The video conferencing architecture can offer an “in-person” meeting experience over a network. Video conferencing architectures can deliver real-time, face-to-face interactions between people using advanced visual, audio, and collaboration technologies. These technologies can transmit life-size, high-definition images, and spatial discrete audio. Specially designed, high-definition cameras can provide quality, high-definition images with superior eye contact. The audio facilitates a full natural conversation with no perceivable latency.


Some issues have arisen in video conferencing scenarios, as systems haves shifted to three-dimensional imaging. Three-dimensional technology presents a significant challenge to developers and network operators, who attempt to offer a video conferencing solution that is realistic, while accounting for bandwidth parameters. Thus, the ability to properly manage three-dimensional video conferencing in a network provides a significant challenge to network designers, component manufacturers, service providers, and system administrators alike.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

To provide a more complete understanding of example embodiments and features and advantages thereof, reference is made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts, in which:



FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic diagram of a conferencing system for providing three-dimensional video operations in a network environment in accordance with one embodiment;



FIG. 2 is a simplified schematic diagram of an image being seen by viewers from two different projectors in accordance with one embodiment;



FIG. 3 is a simplified schematic diagram that illustrates an example user of a video conferencing architecture in accordance with one embodiment;



FIG. 4 is a simplified schematic diagram of an example implementation of a video conferencing architecture in accordance with one embodiment; and



FIG. 5 is a simplified schematic diagram of another example implementation of a video conferencing architecture in accordance with one embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

Overview


A method is provided in one example embodiment and includes receiving data indicative of a personal position of an end user. A media stream is selected from a plurality of media streams to be transmitted to the end user based on the personal position. The selected media stream includes image data of an object captured by a camera and the image data is used to construct a three-dimensional rendering of the object. In more specific embodiments, the media stream selection is executed by a server configured to be coupled to a network. The camera can be part of a plurality of cameras that capture image data associated with the object and that transmit respective media streams over a network. Once a camera begins transmitting image data over the network and to the end user, other cameras from the plurality of cameras stop transmitting their respective media streams over the network. In still other embodiments, the media stream selection is executed by a computer being used by the end user, the computer including an embedded camera for detecting the personal position of the end user. The personal position can be identified through one or more algorithms that detect facial positions and movements, or eye positions. The object can be a counterparty to a video conference involving the end user.


Turning to FIG. 1, FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic diagram of a conferencing system 10 in accordance with one example embodiment. Conferencing system 10 includes an object 12, a viewer 14, and a set of cameras 20 that are configured to be coupled to a group of servers 30, which have a connection to a network 38. Network 38 is configured to be coupled to another group of servers 40, which can communicate with a group of projectors 24 in order to render an image on a multiview screen 50. A set of media streams can be sent to servers 30 (from cameras 20) to be transmitted over network 38. Similarly, a set of media streams 28 can be sent from servers 40 and to projectors 24 in formulating an image to be seen by viewer 14.


In one example, screen 50 is constructed of a special material that makes it a “multiview” screen. Using this special screen, viewer 14 better sees an image, which is projected on the screen from a projector that is just behind him. In FIG. 1, this is the image projected by projector #8 and the head of viewer 14 can line up in such a manner that the line between the camera and viewer 14 passes through the middle of the viewer's head.


Each of the elements of FIG. 1 may couple to one another through simple interfaces or through any other suitable connection (wired or wireless), which provides a viable pathway for communications. Additionally, any one or more of these elements may be combined or removed from the architecture based on particular configuration needs. Note that servers 30 and 40 could be an array of servers, or a single server depending on the specific computational power of the server(s), the resolution of the video cameras, the number of frames per second from the cameras, as well as other relevant video related parameters.


Conferencing system 10 may include a configuration capable of transmission control protocol/internet protocol (TCP/IP) communications for the transmission or reception of packets in a network. Conferencing system 10 may also operate in conjunction with a user datagram protocol/IP (UDP/IP) or any other suitable protocol or tunneling technique, where appropriate and based on particular needs.


To provide a true three-dimensional (3D) transported presence, a system should be able to record and display 3D images. For 3D objects, as a viewer positions his head in different positions around an observed object, the viewer will naturally see different views of that object. For example, assume that a viewer sees the 3D face of another person. As the viewer moves his position [relative to that person], he can see the profile of that counterparty from the right side, from a direct [eye-to-eye] view, and from a left profile of that person.


In a video conferencing session that uses a personal computer screen, the image of a remote user is presented as a two dimensional (2D) image. For a 2D display, an image does not change as the viewer moves his position relative to the display. For example, if a video conferencing screen presents the right sided profile image of a remote person, as the viewer changes his position relative to his personal computer screen, the image seen by the viewer (on his personal computer) does not change. Instead, the viewer only sees the right sided profile of the remote user.


Some architectures can offer a 3D video conferencing experience, but these architectures are expensive (e.g., costly projectors, cameras, servers, etc.) and introduce considerable overhead into the data transmissions. Excessive bandwidth consumption could pose a significant problem for such a system. For example, FIG. 1 could use a plethora of video cameras to capture different views of object 12. The video could then be transported to a local site, where it is fed to different projectors 24 located in positions relative to the positions of cameras 20, which recorded the original video. The system can use a multiview screen, which can accommodate various views.


As a viewer moves his position relative to the multiview screen, he can see one of the projected images better than the other images. For example, if the architecture included sixteen cameras, then sixteen projectors would be used to project image data such that a viewer could view one set of image data and not the other fifteen sets of image data. The performance of such a system is rather marginal because of the leakage of projected images from cameras other than the one associated with the angle of viewing. Additionally, multiview screens provide only a limited number of views and, as such, when a viewer changes his position relative to the screen, the display appears jittery.


Returning to FIG. 1, for purposes of illustration, an example conferencing scenario is provided. In this example, there are two participants on a video conference. The first participant represents the object, whereas the second participant represents the viewer. In some instances, there could be symmetry in equipment such that each participant fulfills both roles as object and viewer. However, in this example scenario to simplify the explanation, one location has different equipment than the remote location.


Focusing on the object side for a moment, a number of cameras 20 are provided that capture image data associated with object 12 from multiple viewing angles. These cameras could be mounted in any suitable fashion, such as in an arc configuration, which is illustrated in FIG. 1. Other configurations could be arbitrary wall mountings, or arrangements in which cameras would be equidistantly spaced, or provided linearly as a string of cameras. In essence, the cameras are capturing image data from the object on all sides. In other arrangements, the cameras could be mounted on a panel or a wall employing TelePresence technology manufactured by Cisco Systems of San Jose, Calif.


The objective in these camera configurations is to capture and transmit image data to a viewer location, which can view the object in three dimensions. The system utilizes multiple cameras at the remote site to capture views of a remote object from multiple angles. At the viewer's location, projectors 24 render the image on multiview screen 50. In one example, the geometry of projectors 24 mimics the geometry of cameras 20 such that if cameras 20 were arranged radially (in an arc configuration), then projectors 24 would also be configured in the same radial arrangement. In a similar endeavor, camera #1 could interface (or be aligned with) projector #1, camera #2 with projector #2, and so forth.


Note that one aspect of three-dimensional imaging includes the notion of a viewer tilting his head from side to side in an effort to glean certain dimensional aspects of the object at the other end of the video conference. In such an instance, the viewer can see a complete picture of the object by simply moving his head from side to side, as would conventionally be done if two people were having an actual conversation facing each other [e.g., on a sidewalk, on a street corner, etc.].


The second aspect of three-dimensional imaging is parallax, which is an apparent displacement or difference of orientation of an object viewed along two different lines of sight. This is generally measured by the angle or semi-angle of inclination between those two lines. Nearby objects have a larger parallax than more distant objects when observed from different positions. Human perception includes overlapping visual fields to use parallax to gain depth perception and this process is known as stereopsis.


Turning back to the illustration of FIG. 1, if viewer 14 is receiving images (for example) from camera #1, he may encounter a situation in which portions of object 12 are obscured from this particular vantage. For purposes of illustrating this concept, an obscuring object 13 is depicted in FIG. 1 and it is between camera #1 and object 12. However, this obscurity is not present at camera #12 and obscuring object 13 does not block the field of view between camera #12 and object 12. Media streams 26 can capture multiple camera perspectives such that, as viewer 14 moves from side to side or changes his orientation, he sees an image from a specific projector associated with a specific camera, which captured the image of the object from an angle associated with the position of the viewer relative to the multiview screen. It is the property of the multiview screen that allows an observer to see images projected from a specific projector, which is behind the user [in a line between the specific projector and multiview screen 50], and thereby overcome this obscurity or simply see object 12 unobstructed. In the example of FIG. 1, this architecture is quite comprehensive in that it includes multiple projectors and multiple cameras for rendering three-dimensional images. The projectors can collectively render an image on a multiview screen for viewer 14 to see.



FIG. 2 is a simplified schematic diagram of an image 52 in which a viewer #1 and a viewer #2 are seeing an image 52 utilizing two different projectors (i.e., projector #1 and projector #2 respectively). In this example, the image is a girl wearing a visor cap, where the first viewer sees one side of her image and the second viewer sees a different perspective of this image. This is because the first viewer is associated with projector #1 and the second viewer is associated with projector #2. As the viewer changes his current position, he can see different details associated with this particular image. For example, as the viewer moves from one location/vantage to another, he could see that this girl has a ponytail. If this scenario involved a video conference between two participants, as the viewer moved his own location, he could see a different side (or angle) of a counterparty on the video conference. In effect, the viewer is utilizing different projectors and different camera angles in order to see additional details that would otherwise not be shown to him in a simplistic face-to-face conversation scenario.



FIG. 3 is a simplified schematic diagram of a viewer 64, who is working with a personal computer (PC) 60. Personal computer 60 includes an embedded camera 62, which is used to capture and transmit the image of viewer 64 to a remote video conferencing partner (not shown). Personal computer 60 can be configured to be coupled to a network 68 through various potential arrangements such that image data can readily be transmitted over network 68.



FIG. 4 is a simplified schematic diagram of an example arrangement associated with a video conferencing scenario. The same viewer 64 is depicted in this example, where network 68 is configured to be coupled to a server 72. As shown in this embodiment, viewer 64 can move his head left and right, and back and forth and still be kept within the camera's field of view (shown generally at an arrow 70). All of this head positioning can be captured by server 72, which can store and process a virtual image 74 of viewer 64 within field of view 70 of camera 62. Virtual image 74 can be sent over network 68 from PC 60 to server 72, which is attached to network 68 and which can capture the position of the head of viewer 64 in virtual image frame 74, as the user moves left and right (in relation to PC 60). This movement is illustrated by a set of virtual images 76, 78, and 80, which show viewer 64 in the middle, right side, and left side of an image.


In addition, viewer 64 can have his position tracked (e.g., via server 72, via some software being provisioned in the network, or software that is resident on PC 60 [or software that is provided externally to PC 60], etc.) such that when he tilts his head from side to side, he can see different angles of a remote object being shown on his individual display. For example, software can use facial and eye recognition algorithms to identify when viewer 64 has shifted his line of sight and then respond by changing the angle of perception being rendered to his PC.


Consider a case where someone has bitten into an apple and removed a portion of this object. If the apple were placed on a desk, the perspective of the viewer would dictate if he sees this missing bite. In a simple linear video conferencing arrangement, viewer 64 might only see the front of the apple and nothing else. In contrast, the arrangement of FIG. 3 allows viewer 64 to move left and right and actually see that there is a bite missing from this apple. Software provided at various locations (as described previously) can identify when the viewer has shifted his head in an attempt to see a different angle of the viewed object. In specific embodiments, server 72 has video analytics software capable of recognizing when viewer 64 has shifted his head, as shown in virtual images 76, 78, and 80. Thus, when viewer 64 moves to the right, he is indirectly, or inadvertently, telling the system that he would like to see a different perspective associated with objects appearing on the screen of his computer. In essence, viewer 64 is requesting the view from a different angle of view and, thereby, from a different camera at the remote location.


This discussion also lends itself to FIG. 2 and the way in which a given viewer can change his perspective and re-associate himself with a different camera and a different projector. As viewer 64 moves to the right, he moves into alignment with projector #2. In a similar fashion, as viewer 64 moves to the left, he aligns himself with projector #1. In the context of the architecture of FIG. 4, server 72 has the intelligence to indicate to projector #2 to stop projecting image data, as viewer 64 moves to the left and receives information from projector #1. Additionally, in one example embodiment, as projector #2 is instructed to stop projecting image data, so too should camera #2 stop capturing and/or transmitting image data over the network. This could offer a considerable efficiency and bandwidth savings because this unnecessary information is no longer being transmitted over the network.



FIG. 5 is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating a system 54 that can allow a given viewer to control various video streams at a single point 80 at which a single video stream is selected. A number of cameras are depicted in order to capture image data associated with an object 88. A server 84 is configured to be coupled to a network 90, and the server can receive and analyze a virtual image 82 of viewer 64 in a corresponding memory of server 84. Below virtual image 82 is an illustration of head positioning variations for a set of virtual images 92 for this particular user. A line is shown with arrows [left and right] to show the position (left/right) of the head in virtual image 82 relative to the center of the image. The viewer location can select a particular media stream to be transmitted. This viewer location can be derived with respect to the viewer's particular screen of PC 60. In a sense, through facial indicators, or through head movements, the viewer is controlling the video stream that is rendered to him from camera array 20. Note that in order to facilitate a smooth transition amongst the videos from the multiple cameras, media capturing of the respective video frames from the plurality of cameras can be synchronized. Also note that the selection process can be performed by a personal computer of the viewer, or there is an option for video analytics (and video stream selection) being performed by a server attached to the network [e.g., server 84 of FIG. 5].


The dashed line depicted in FIG. 5 is acting as a control for the video stream being shown to the viewer. Thus, this virtual switch is selecting which camera is sending its images over network 90 and onto the viewer. Therefore, image data from a single camera can be selected and propagated over the network in contrast to having a full array of cameras sending image data continually over the network. Not only would such transmissions be wasteful, but they would also be cumbersome in terms of processing and, further, possibly create an impossible bandwidth scenario for network links and endpoints that could not handle such a large amount of data.


The receiving side in this scenario is only receiving image data associated with a single camera and, therefore, is only receiving a single media stream. Reciprocally, the sending side is only sending image data from a single camera and this activity is being dictated by the viewer moving left and right in front of his computer. Just as importantly, the viewer is able to see object 88 from different sides, which enhances his perception or visualization of object 88. The system can use a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) PC with a 2D display to give the user the ability to see the image from multiple views as a function of his head position. This can provide the viewers with a 3D viewing capability using a 2D display.


In another example operational flow, the system can utilize a face detection algorithm to detect the position of a local participant relative to his personal computer. In this example, the video camera is integrated with a personal computer, which is a current feature for many personal computers (e.g., Apple computers). This particular user (having a video-enabled personal computer) is participating in a video conference with remote TelePresence users.


The personal computer video camera captures the image of the local participant and sends it to a processing platform or server attached to the network for processing and for subsequent distribution to remote sites. The server could include an image-processing platform such as Cisco's media experience engine (MXE), which is a processing element that can attach to the network. The MXE can simplify media sharing across the network by optimizing its delivery in any format for any device. It could also provide media conversion, real-time postproduction, editing, formatting, and network distribution for visual communications. The system can utilize real-time face and eye recognition algorithms to detect the position of the participant's eyes in the video frame. In this example, the system analyzes the position of the eyes of the local user in the video frame. The system then presents the local user media stream relative to his position in the video frame.


In this example embodiment, the analysis of the specific position of the viewer's head in field of view 70 (or the corresponding frame of virtual image 82) could be done at the endpoint personal computer, or at the digital signal processing (DSP) level. As the system detects the position of the local conference participant [e.g., viewer 64] relative to his personal computer, the system selects the appropriate media stream from the plurality of media streams captured by the remote site cameras 20 and renders it to the local participant/viewer.


In accordance with one embodiment, the selection of the video stream to be rendered to the personal computer is made at the source. As such, the remote site does not need to send the video from all of its cameras. Rather, the remote site sends only the video from the camera that represents the viewing angle of the local participant relative to his personal computer. In accordance with yet another embodiment, the remote site sends all of its video streams to the processing server, which can be attached to the network. The determination of which video stream should be selected and sent to the local personal computer could be made in the processing server. In either case, the location of the local participant relative to his personal computer can govern the media selection process.


In the case when the system detects multiple people gazing at the same personal computer screen, the system has various policies it can execute. For example, the system can be configured to default to a single view and present the view from the middle of the remote room. A second option could involve the system detecting which participant (from the group of local participants) is the speaker and then presenting the media stream associated with the location of the latest speaker in the room. In a third option, the system can detect the top ranking person among the personal computer viewers (e.g., using a company directory) and present the conference from his point of view. In other cases, a hierarchy could be preprogrammed into the system, or at the outset/establishment of the video conference.


There are a number of important advantages that such a system can offer. For example, the system can utilize an off-the-shelf personal computer, as opposed to an expensive multiview display (such as the one described in FIG. 1) to achieve its intended functionality. The architecture grants access to the 3D functionality for any user utilizing a simple personal computer. Additionally, examples outlined herein in this Specification can send only a single video stream to a personal computer user. Therefore, the system can be used by users at home, who have limited bandwidth (e.g., a digital subscriber line (DSL) connection). In addition, such a system can scale well, as the need for multiple expensive projectors and a multiview screen is eliminated. The tendered architecture can also operate with multiple viewers. Some example configurations include the ability to default to a 2D system when more than one viewer is detected. Moreover, the system can utilize a processing server (e.g., an MXE), which moves the 3D functionality selection of an appropriate media stream relative to the position of the viewer into the network.


Software for checking the position of the viewer (for example, with respect to his screen) can be provided at various locations. In one example implementation, this software is provided in the various servers described herein. This could involve servers 84, 72, 24, and/or 30. In other examples, this could involve a proprietary element, which could be provided in (or proximate to) PC 60 (or any other device being used by a given end-user in a video conferencing scenario), or be provisioned somewhere in the network. The image recognition and/or face recognition software can identify where the viewer is at any given moment, or based on data from a previous frame. Based on this information, a command can be sent to the remote location to render image data from a particular camera. The remote site could be sending any number of sets of image data from various cameras. A server at the remote location (for example, servers 30) can dictate which cameras should be transmitting its media stream over the network, and which cameras should not.


As used herein in this Specification, the term ‘server’ is meant to encompass routers, switches, bridges, gateway, processors, loadbalancers, firewalls, or any other suitable device, component, element, or object operable to exchange or process information in a network environment. Moreover, these servers may include any suitable hardware, software, components, modules, interfaces, or objects that facilitate the operations thereof. This may be inclusive of appropriate algorithms and communication protocols that allow for the effective exchange of data or information. Also, as used herein, the term ‘personal position’ [in regards to capturing the positioning of the end user in front of his computer] includes any vertical or lateral positions (or movements) of the end user's head (and associated anatomy), etc. and also includes any facial or eye positions that can be detected or otherwise recognized by a system. This can include positions (or movements) relative to a point of reference (e.g., a screen of a computer) or other types of head positions, which are arbitrary or identified through position detection technology, or through other protocols in which there may or may not be a point of reference. Any such approaches are included in the term ‘personal position’ and, accordingly, should be construed as such. The term ‘computer’ in such scenarios includes any type of personal digital assistant (PDA), a personal computer (PC), a laptop or electronic notebook, a cellular telephone, an IP telephone with video capabilities, an I-Phone, or any other device, component, element, or object capable of initiating video data exchanges within a system. This includes accompanying panels and screens in which such a computer could proxy the video data and then assist in rendering images to a subsequent plane.


In one example implementation, a processing server includes software for achieving some or all of the functionalities outlined herein [for example, determining which video stream to capture, transmit, and/or receive]. In other embodiments, this feature may be provided external to the server or included in some other network device, or in a computer (e.g., a personal computer) to achieve these intended functionalities. Alternatively, both of these elements (the personal computer and the server) can include this software (or reciprocating software) that can coordinate in order to achieve the media stream selection operations outlined herein. In still other embodiments, one, two, or all of these devices may include any suitable algorithms, hardware, software, components, modules, interfaces, or objects that facilitate the operations thereof.


Each of these elements (the server and the personal computer) can also include memory elements for storing information to be used in achieving the control and general processing mechanisms outlined herein. Additionally, each of these devices may include a processor that can execute software (e.g., logic) or an algorithm to perform the activities discussed in this Specification. These components may further keep information in any suitable memory element such as a random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), erasable programmable ROM (EPROM), electronically erasable PROM (EEPROM), application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), software, hardware, or in any other suitable component, device, element, or object where appropriate and based on particular needs.


Note that with the examples provided herein, interaction may be described in terms of two, three, four, or more network elements. However, this has been done for purposes of clarity and example only. In certain cases, it may be easier to describe one or more of the functionalities of a given set of flows by only referencing a limited number of components or network elements. It should be appreciated that system 54 of FIG. 5 (and its teachings) are readily scalable. The architecture of FIG. 5 represents a scalable architecture by minimizing the required bandwidth and by using an inexpensive off-the-shelf PC. System 54 can accommodate a large number of components, as well as more complicated or sophisticated arrangements and configurations. Accordingly, the examples provided should not limit the scope or inhibit the broad teachings of system 54, as potentially applied to a myriad of other architectures.


It is also important to note that the steps described with reference to the preceding FIGURES illustrate only some of the possible scenarios that may be executed by, or within, conferencing system 10 and system 54. Some of these steps may be deleted or removed where appropriate, or these steps may be modified or changed considerably without departing from the scope of the discussed concepts. In addition, a number of these operations have been described as being executed concurrently with, or in parallel to, one or more additional operations. However, the timing of these operations may be altered considerably. The preceding operational flows have been offered for purposes of example and discussion. Substantial flexibility is provided by conferencing system 10 and system 54 in that any suitable arrangements, chronologies, configurations, and timing mechanisms may be provided without departing from the teachings of the discussed concepts.


The concepts presented herein can also readily be applied to video game applications and related screens, equipment, and/or consoles. In addition, these outlined concepts could employ the use of a single camera that could (in some manner) capture multiple angles of perception. This could involve some sort of scanning operation, or actual physical motion on the part of a single camera, or involve movement of its internal components. Any such single camera configurations (and any permutations thereof) are clearly within the scope of the presented material.


Numerous other changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications may be ascertained to one skilled in the art and it can be intended that the discussed concept encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications as falling within the scope of the appended claims. In order to assist the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and, additionally, any readers of any patent issued on this application in interpreting the claims appended hereto, Applicant wishes to note that the Applicant: (a) does not intend any of the appended claims to invoke paragraph six (6) of 35 U.S.C. section 112 as it exists on the date of the filing hereof unless the words “means for” or “step for” are specifically used in the particular claims; and (b) does not intend, by any statement in the specification, to limit this invention in any way that is not otherwise reflected in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method, comprising: receiving data indicative of a personal position of an end user;selecting a media stream from a plurality of media streams to be transmitted to the end user based on the personal position, wherein each of the media streams includes image data of an object captured by a camera and the image data is used to construct a three-dimensional rendering of the object;detecting a change in the personal position of the end user to a new personal position; andselecting a second media stream from the plurality of media streams to be transmitted and presented to the end user, wherein the second media stream is selected based on the new personal position; andwherein if multiple end users are detected at a computer screen, a default mechanism is triggered to provide a single view, which is presented from a middle of a remote room that includes the computer screen, and a hierarchy is determined amongst the end users and a media stream is selected that is associated with a highest-ranking end user of the hierarchy.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the media stream selection is executed by a server configured to be coupled to a network.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the camera is part of a plurality of cameras that capture image data associated with the object and wherein each of the cameras transmits a respective one of the plurality of media streams over a network.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein only one of the plurality of cameras transmits image data over the network and to the end user at a time.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the media stream selection is executed by a computer being used by the end user, the computer including an embedded camera for detecting the personal position of the end user.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the personal position is identified through one or more algorithms that detect facial positions, or eye positions.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the camera is part of an array of cameras and media capturing of respective video frames from the array of cameras is synchronized.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein if multiple end users are detected at a computer screen, a speaker is detected and a media stream is selected that is associated with a location of the speaker.
  • 9. Logic encoded in one or more non-transitory tangible media for execution and when executed by a processor operable to: receive data indicative of a personal position of an end user;select a media stream from a plurality of media streams to be transmitted to the end user based on the personal position, wherein each of the media streams includes image data of an object captured by a camera and the image data is used to construct a three-dimensional rendering of the object;detect a change in the personal position of the end user to a new personal position; andselect a second media stream from the plurality of media streams to be transmitted and presented to the end user, wherein the second media stream is selected based on the new personal position; andwherein if multiple end users are detected at a computer screen, a default mechanism is triggered to provide a single view, which is presented from a middle of a remote room that includes the computer screen, and a hierarchy is determined amongst the end users and a media stream is selected that is associated with a highest-ranking end user of the hierarchy.
  • 10. The logic of claim 9, wherein the camera is part of a plurality of cameras, each transmitting one of the media streams, and wherein only one of the plurality of cameras transmits image data over a network and to the end user at a time.
  • 11. The logic of claim 9, wherein the media stream selection is executed 15 by a computer being used by the end user, the computer including an embedded camera for detecting the personal position of the end user.
  • 12. The logic of claim 9, wherein the personal position is identified through one or more algorithms that detect facial positions, or eye positions.
  • 13. The logic of claim 9, wherein the camera is part of an array of cameras and media capturing of respective video frames from the array of cameras is synchronized.
  • 14. An apparatus, comprising: a server configured to: receive data indicative of a personal position of an end user;select a media stream from a plurality of media streams to be transmitted to the end user based on the personal position, wherein each of the media streams includes image data of an object captured by a camera and the image data is used to construct a three-dimensional rendering of the object;detect a change in the personal position of the end user to a new personal position; andselect a second media stream from the plurality of media streams to be transmitted and presented to the end user, wherein the second media stream is selected based on the new personal position; andwherein if multiple end users are detected at a computer screen, a default mechanism is triggered to provide a single view, which is presented from a middle of a remote room that includes the computer screen, and a hierarchy is determined amongst the end users and a media stream is selected that is associated with a highest-ranking end user of the hierarchy.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the media stream selection is executed by a computer being used by the end user, the computer including an embedded camera for detecting the personal position of the end user.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the camera is part of a plurality of cameras that capture image data associated with the object and wherein each of the cameras transmits a respective one of the plurality of media streams over a network.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein only one of the plurality of cameras transmits image data over the network and to the end user at a time.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the personal position is identified through one or more algorithms that detect facial positions, or eye positions.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein video analytics and media stream selection is performed by the server, which is attached to a network.
  • 20. A system, comprising: means for receiving data indicative of a personal position of an end user;means for selecting a media stream from a plurality of media streams to be transmitted to the end user based on the personal position, wherein each of the media streams includes image data of an object captured by a camera and the image data is used to construct a three-dimensional rendering of the object;means for detecting a change in the personal position of the end user to a new personal position; andmeans for selecting a second media stream from the plurality of media streams to be transmitted and presented to the end user, wherein the second media stream is selected based on the new personal position; andwherein if multiple end users are detected at a computer screen, a default mechanism is triggered to provide a single view, which is presented from a middle of a remote room that includes the computer screen, and a hierarchy is determined amongst the end users and a media stream is selected that is associated with a highest-ranking end user of the hierarchy.
  • 21. The system of claim 20, wherein the camera is part of a plurality of cameras that capture image data associated with the object and wherein each of the cameras transmits a respective one of the plurality of media streams over a network.
  • 22. The system of claim 21, wherein only one of the plurality of cameras transmits image data over the network and to the end user at a time.
  • 23. The system of claim 20, wherein the personal position is identified through one or more algorithms that detect facial positions, or eye positions.
  • 24. The system of claim 20, wherein the media stream selection and video analytics are performed by a server, which is attached to a network.
  • 25. The system of claim 20, wherein if multiple end users are detected at a computer screen, a speaker is detected and a media stream is selected that is associated with a location of the speaker.
US Referenced Citations (422)
Number Name Date Kind
2911462 Brady Nov 1959 A
D212798 Dreyfuss Nov 1968 S
3793489 Sank Feb 1974 A
3909121 De Mesquita Cardoso Sep 1975 A
4400724 Fields Aug 1983 A
4473285 Winter Sep 1984 A
4494144 Brown Jan 1985 A
4750123 Christian Jun 1988 A
4815132 Minami Mar 1989 A
4827253 Maltz May 1989 A
4853764 Sutter Aug 1989 A
4890314 Judd et al. Dec 1989 A
4961211 Tsugane et al. Oct 1990 A
4994912 Lumelsky et al. Feb 1991 A
5003532 Ashida et al. Mar 1991 A
5020098 Celli May 1991 A
5136652 Jibbe et al. Aug 1992 A
5187571 Braun et al. Feb 1993 A
5200818 Neta et al. Apr 1993 A
5249035 Yamanaka Sep 1993 A
5255211 Redmond Oct 1993 A
D341848 Bigelow et al. Nov 1993 S
5268734 Parker et al. Dec 1993 A
5317405 Kuriki et al. May 1994 A
5337363 Platt Aug 1994 A
5347363 Yamanaka Sep 1994 A
5351067 Lumelsky et al. Sep 1994 A
5359362 Lewis et al. Oct 1994 A
D357468 Rodd Apr 1995 S
5406326 Mowry Apr 1995 A
5423554 Davis Jun 1995 A
5446834 Deering Aug 1995 A
5448287 Hull Sep 1995 A
5467401 Nagamitsu et al. Nov 1995 A
5495576 Ritchey Feb 1996 A
5502481 Dentinger et al. Mar 1996 A
5502726 Fischer Mar 1996 A
5506604 Nally et al. Apr 1996 A
5532737 Braun Jul 1996 A
5541639 Takatsuki et al. Jul 1996 A
5541773 Kamo et al. Jul 1996 A
5570372 Shaffer Oct 1996 A
5572248 Allen et al. Nov 1996 A
5587726 Moffat Dec 1996 A
5612733 Flohr Mar 1997 A
5625410 Washino et al. Apr 1997 A
5666153 Copeland Sep 1997 A
5673401 Volk et al. Sep 1997 A
5675374 Kohda Oct 1997 A
5715377 Fukushima et al. Feb 1998 A
D391935 Sakaguchi et al. Mar 1998 S
D392269 Mason et al. Mar 1998 S
5729471 Jain et al. Mar 1998 A
5737011 Lukacs Apr 1998 A
5748121 Romriell May 1998 A
5760826 Nayar Jun 1998 A
5790182 Hilaire Aug 1998 A
5796724 Rajamani et al. Aug 1998 A
5815196 Alshawi Sep 1998 A
5818514 Duttweiler et al. Oct 1998 A
5821985 Iizawa Oct 1998 A
5889499 Nally et al. Mar 1999 A
5894321 Downs et al. Apr 1999 A
D410447 Chang Jun 1999 S
5940118 Van Schyndel Aug 1999 A
5940530 Fukushima et al. Aug 1999 A
5953052 McNelley et al. Sep 1999 A
5956100 Gorski Sep 1999 A
6069658 Watanabe May 2000 A
6088045 Lumelsky et al. Jul 2000 A
6097441 Allport Aug 2000 A
6101113 Paice Aug 2000 A
6148092 Qian Nov 2000 A
6167162 Jacquin et al. Dec 2000 A
6172703 Lee Jan 2001 B1
6173069 Daly et al. Jan 2001 B1
6226035 Korein et al. May 2001 B1
6243130 McNelley et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249318 Girod et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256400 Takata et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266082 Yonezawa et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266098 Cove et al. Jul 2001 B1
6292575 Bortolussi et al. Sep 2001 B1
6356589 Gebler et al. Mar 2002 B1
6380539 Edgar Apr 2002 B1
6424377 Driscoll, Jr. Jul 2002 B1
6430222 Okadia Aug 2002 B1
6459451 Driscoll et al. Oct 2002 B2
6462767 Obata et al. Oct 2002 B1
6493032 Wallerstein et al. Dec 2002 B1
6507356 Jackel et al. Jan 2003 B1
6573904 Chun et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577333 Tai et al. Jun 2003 B2
6583808 Boulanger et al. Jun 2003 B2
6590603 Sheldon et al. Jul 2003 B2
6591314 Colbath Jul 2003 B1
6593955 Falcon Jul 2003 B1
6593956 Potts et al. Jul 2003 B1
6611281 Strubbe Aug 2003 B2
6680856 Schreiber Jan 2004 B2
6693663 Harris Feb 2004 B1
6694094 Partynski et al. Feb 2004 B2
6704048 Malkin et al. Mar 2004 B1
6710797 McNelley et al. Mar 2004 B1
6751106 Zhang et al. Jun 2004 B2
D492692 Fallon et al. Jul 2004 S
6763226 McZeal Jul 2004 B1
6768722 Katseff et al. Jul 2004 B1
6771303 Zhang et al. Aug 2004 B2
6774927 Cohen et al. Aug 2004 B1
6795108 Jarboe et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795558 Matsuo et al. Sep 2004 B2
6798834 Murakami et al. Sep 2004 B1
6806898 Toyama et al. Oct 2004 B1
6807280 Stroud et al. Oct 2004 B1
6831653 Kehlet et al. Dec 2004 B2
6844990 Artonne et al. Jan 2005 B2
6853398 Malzbender et al. Feb 2005 B2
6867798 Wada et al. Mar 2005 B1
6882358 Schuster et al. Apr 2005 B1
6888358 Lechner et al. May 2005 B2
6909438 White et al. Jun 2005 B1
6911995 Ivanov et al. Jun 2005 B2
6917271 Zhang et al. Jul 2005 B2
6922718 Chang Jul 2005 B2
6963653 Miles Nov 2005 B1
6980526 Jang et al. Dec 2005 B2
6989754 Kisacanin et al. Jan 2006 B2
6989836 Ramsey Jan 2006 B2
6989856 Firestone et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990086 Holur et al. Jan 2006 B1
7002973 MeLampy et al. Feb 2006 B2
7023855 Haumont et al. Apr 2006 B2
7028092 MeLampy et al. Apr 2006 B2
7031311 MeLampy et al. Apr 2006 B2
7043528 Schmitt et al. May 2006 B2
7046862 Ishizaka et al. May 2006 B2
7057636 Cohen-Solal et al. Jun 2006 B1
7057662 Malzbender Jun 2006 B2
7061896 Jabbari et al. Jun 2006 B2
7072504 Miyano et al. Jul 2006 B2
7072833 Rajan Jul 2006 B2
7080157 McCanne Jul 2006 B2
7092002 Ferren et al. Aug 2006 B2
7111045 Kato et al. Sep 2006 B2
7126627 Lewis et al. Oct 2006 B1
7131135 Virag et al. Oct 2006 B1
7136651 Kalavade Nov 2006 B2
7139767 Taylor et al. Nov 2006 B1
D533525 Arie Dec 2006 S
D533852 Ma Dec 2006 S
D534511 Maeda et al. Jan 2007 S
D535954 Hwang et al. Jan 2007 S
7158674 Suh Jan 2007 B2
7161942 Chen et al. Jan 2007 B2
D539243 Chiu et al. Mar 2007 S
7197008 Shabtay et al. Mar 2007 B1
D541773 Chong et al. May 2007 S
D542247 Kinoshita et al. May 2007 S
7221260 Berezowski et al. May 2007 B2
D545314 Kim Jun 2007 S
7239338 Krisbergh et al. Jul 2007 B2
7246118 Chastain et al. Jul 2007 B2
D550635 DeMaio et al. Sep 2007 S
D551184 Kanou et al. Sep 2007 S
7269292 Steinberg Sep 2007 B2
7274555 Kim et al. Sep 2007 B2
D555610 Yang et al. Nov 2007 S
D559265 Armstrong et al. Jan 2008 S
D560681 Fletcher Jan 2008 S
D561130 Won et al. Feb 2008 S
7336299 Kostrzewski Feb 2008 B2
D567202 Rieu Piquet Apr 2008 S
7352809 Wenger et al. Apr 2008 B2
7353279 Durvasula et al. Apr 2008 B2
7359731 Choksi Apr 2008 B2
7399095 Rondinelli Jul 2008 B2
7411975 Mohaban Aug 2008 B1
7413150 Hsu Aug 2008 B1
7428000 Cutler et al. Sep 2008 B2
D578496 Leonard Oct 2008 S
7440615 Gong et al. Oct 2008 B2
7450134 Maynard et al. Nov 2008 B2
7471320 Malkin et al. Dec 2008 B2
7477657 Murphy et al. Jan 2009 B1
D588560 Mellingen et al. Mar 2009 S
7505036 Baldwin Mar 2009 B1
7518051 Redmann Apr 2009 B2
D592621 Han May 2009 S
7529425 Kitamura et al. May 2009 B2
7532230 Culbertson et al. May 2009 B2
7532232 Shah et al. May 2009 B2
7534056 Cross et al. May 2009 B2
7545761 Kalbag Jun 2009 B1
7551432 Bockheim et al. Jun 2009 B1
7555141 Mori Jun 2009 B2
7575537 Ellis Aug 2009 B2
7577246 Idan et al. Aug 2009 B2
D602453 Ding et al. Oct 2009 S
7616226 Roessler et al. Nov 2009 B2
7646419 Cernasov Jan 2010 B2
D610560 Chen Feb 2010 S
7679639 Harrell et al. Mar 2010 B2
7692680 Graham Apr 2010 B2
7707247 Dunn et al. Apr 2010 B2
D615514 Mellingen et al. May 2010 S
7710448 De Beer et al. May 2010 B2
7710450 Dhuey et al. May 2010 B2
7714222 Taub et al. May 2010 B2
7715657 Lin et al. May 2010 B2
7719605 Hirasawa et al. May 2010 B2
7719662 Bamji et al. May 2010 B2
7720277 Hattori May 2010 B2
7725919 Thiagarajan et al. May 2010 B1
D626102 Buzzard et al. Oct 2010 S
D626103 Buzzard et al. Oct 2010 S
D628175 Desai et al. Nov 2010 S
7839434 Ciudad et al. Nov 2010 B2
D628968 Desai et al. Dec 2010 S
7855726 Ferren et al. Dec 2010 B2
7861189 Watanabe et al. Dec 2010 B2
7889851 Shah et al. Feb 2011 B2
7894531 Cetin et al. Feb 2011 B1
D635569 Park Apr 2011 S
D635975 Seo et al. Apr 2011 S
7939959 Wagoner May 2011 B2
7990422 Ahiska et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000559 Kwon Aug 2011 B2
8077857 Lambert Dec 2011 B1
8081346 Anup et al. Dec 2011 B1
8086076 Tian et al. Dec 2011 B2
8135068 Alvarez Mar 2012 B1
8179419 Girish et al. May 2012 B2
8219404 Weinberg et al. Jul 2012 B2
8259155 Marathe et al. Sep 2012 B2
D669086 Boyer et al. Oct 2012 S
D669088 Boyer et al. Oct 2012 S
8299979 Rambo et al. Oct 2012 B2
8315466 El-Maleh et al. Nov 2012 B2
8363719 Nakayama Jan 2013 B2
8436888 Baldino et al. May 2013 B1
8477175 Shaffer et al. Jul 2013 B2
20020047892 Gonsalves Apr 2002 A1
20020106120 Brandenburg et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020108125 Joao Aug 2002 A1
20020114392 Sekiguchi et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020118890 Rondinelli Aug 2002 A1
20020131608 Lobb et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140804 Colmenarez et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020149672 Clapp et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020186528 Huang Dec 2002 A1
20020196737 Bullard Dec 2002 A1
20030017872 Oishi et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030048218 Milnes et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030071932 Tanigaki Apr 2003 A1
20030072460 Gonopolskiy et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030149724 Chang Aug 2003 A1
20030160861 Barlow et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030179285 Naito Sep 2003 A1
20030185303 Hall Oct 2003 A1
20030197687 Shetter Oct 2003 A1
20040003411 Nakai et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040032906 Lillig Feb 2004 A1
20040038169 Mandelkern et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040061787 Liu et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040091232 Appling, III May 2004 A1
20040118984 Kim et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040119814 Clisham et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040164858 Lin Aug 2004 A1
20040165060 McNelley et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040178955 Menache et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040189463 Wathen Sep 2004 A1
20040189676 Dischert Sep 2004 A1
20040196250 Mehrotra et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040207718 Boyden et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040218755 Marton et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040246962 Kopeikin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040246972 Wang et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254982 Hoffman et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260796 Sundqvist et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050007954 Sreemanthula et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050024484 Leonard Feb 2005 A1
20050050246 Lakkakorpi et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050081160 Wee et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050110867 Schulz May 2005 A1
20050117022 Marchant Jun 2005 A1
20050129325 Wu Jun 2005 A1
20050147257 Melchior et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050248652 Firestone et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050268823 Bakker et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060013495 Duan et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060017807 Lee et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060028983 Wright Feb 2006 A1
20060029084 Grayson Feb 2006 A1
20060038878 Takashima et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060056056 Ahiska et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060066717 Miceli Mar 2006 A1
20060072813 Matsumoto et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060082643 Richards Apr 2006 A1
20060093128 Oxford May 2006 A1
20060100004 Kim et al. May 2006 A1
20060104297 Buyukkoc et al. May 2006 A1
20060104470 Akino May 2006 A1
20060120307 Sahashi Jun 2006 A1
20060120568 McConville et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060125691 Menache et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060126878 Takumai et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060152489 Sweetser et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060152575 Amiel et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060158509 Kenoyer et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060168302 Boskovic et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060170769 Zhou Aug 2006 A1
20060181607 McNelley et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200518 Sinclair et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060233120 Eshel et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060256187 Sheldon et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060284786 Takano et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060289772 Johnson et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070019621 Perry et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070039030 Romanowich et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070040903 Kawaguchi Feb 2007 A1
20070070177 Christensen Mar 2007 A1
20070080845 Amand Apr 2007 A1
20070112966 Eftis et al. May 2007 A1
20070120971 Kennedy May 2007 A1
20070121353 Zhang et al. May 2007 A1
20070140337 Lim et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070153712 Fry et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070159523 Hillis et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070183661 El-Maleh et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070188597 Kenoyer et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070189219 Navoli et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070192381 Padmanabhan Aug 2007 A1
20070206091 Dunn et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070206556 Yegani et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070206602 Halabi et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070217406 Riedel et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070217500 Gao et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070229250 Recker et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070247470 Dhuey et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250567 Graham et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250620 Shah et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070263079 Graham et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070273752 Chambers et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070279483 Beers et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070279484 Derocher et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070285505 Korneliussen Dec 2007 A1
20080043041 Hedenstroem et al. Feb 2008 A2
20080044064 His Feb 2008 A1
20080077390 Nagao Mar 2008 A1
20080084429 Wissinger Apr 2008 A1
20080136896 Graham et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151038 Khouri et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080153537 Khawand et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080167078 Elbye Jul 2008 A1
20080198755 Vasseur et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208444 Ruckart Aug 2008 A1
20080212677 Chen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215974 Harrison et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080218582 Buckler Sep 2008 A1
20080219268 Dennison Sep 2008 A1
20080232688 Senior et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080232692 Kaku Sep 2008 A1
20080240237 Tian et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080240571 Tian et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080246833 Yasui et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080266380 Gorzynski et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080267282 Kalipatnapu et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080297586 Kurtz et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080298571 Kurtz et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080303901 Variyath et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090009593 Cameron et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090051756 Trachtenberg Feb 2009 A1
20090115723 Henty May 2009 A1
20090122867 Mauchly et al. May 2009 A1
20090129753 Wagenlander May 2009 A1
20090174764 Chadha et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090193345 Wensley et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090207179 Huang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090207233 Mauchly et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090207234 Chen et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090244257 MacDonald et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090256901 Mauchly et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090279476 Li et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090322082 Wagoner Dec 2009 A1
20090324023 Tian et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100008373 Xiao et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100014530 Cutaia Jan 2010 A1
20100027907 Cherna et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042281 Filla Feb 2010 A1
20100118112 Nimri et al. May 2010 A1
20100123770 Friel et al. May 2010 A1
20100149301 Lee et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100153853 Dawes et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100171807 Tysso Jul 2010 A1
20100171808 Harrell et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100183199 Smith et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100199228 Latta et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100201823 Zhang et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100202285 Cohen et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100205281 Porter et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100208078 Tian et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100241845 Alonso Sep 2010 A1
20100259619 Nicholson Oct 2010 A1
20100268843 Van Wie et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100277563 Gupta et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100283829 De Beer et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100316232 Acero et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110008017 Gausereide Jan 2011 A1
20110039506 Lindahl et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110063467 Tanaka Mar 2011 A1
20110085016 Kristiansen et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110090303 Wu et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110109642 Chang et al. May 2011 A1
20110242266 Blackburn et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110249086 Guo et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110276901 Zambetti et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120026278 Goodman et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120038742 Robinson et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120106428 Schlicht et al. May 2012 A1
20120143605 Thorsen et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120169838 Sekine Jul 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (47)
Number Date Country
101953158 Jan 2011 CN
102067593 May 2011 CN
502600 Sep 1992 EP
0 650 299 Oct 1994 EP
0 714 081 Nov 1995 EP
0 740 177 Apr 1996 EP
1143745 Oct 2001 EP
1 178 352 Jun 2002 EP
1 589 758 Oct 2005 EP
1701308 Sep 2006 EP
1768058 Mar 2007 EP
2073543 Jun 2009 EP
2255531 Dec 2010 EP
2277308 Jan 2011 EP
2 294 605 May 1996 GB
2336266 Oct 1999 GB
2355876 May 2001 GB
WO 9416517 Jul 1994 WO
WO 9621321 Jul 1996 WO
WO 9708896 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9847291 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9959026 Nov 1999 WO
WO 0133840 May 2001 WO
WO 2005013001 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005031001 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2006072755 Jul 2006 WO
WO2007106157 Sep 2007 WO
WO2007123946 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2007123960 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2007123960 Nov 2007 WO
WO2008039371 Apr 2008 WO
WO 2008040258 Apr 2008 WO
WO 2008101117 Aug 2008 WO
WO 2008118887 Oct 2008 WO
WO 2008118887 Oct 2008 WO
WO 2009102503 Aug 2009 WO
WO 2009102503 Aug 2009 WO
WO 2009120814 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2009120814 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2010059481 May 2010 WO
WO2010096342 Aug 2010 WO
WO 2010104765 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2010132271 Nov 2010 WO
WO2012033716 Mar 2012 WO
WO2012068008 May 2012 WO
WO2012068010 May 2012 WO
WO2012068485 May 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (271)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,291, filed Sep. 19, 2008, entitled “System and Method for Enabling Communication Sessions in a Network Environment,” Inventor(s): Yifan Gao et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,593, filed Feb. 5, 2009, entitled “System and Method for Depth Perspective Image Rendering,” Inventor(s): J. William Mauchly et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,075, filed May 29, 2009, entitled “System and Method for Extending Communications Between Participants in a Conferencing Environment,” Inventor(s): Brian J. Baldino et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/400,582, filed Mar. 9, 2009, entitled “System and Method for Providing Three Dimensional Imaging in a Network Environment,” Inventor(s): Shmuel Shaffer et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/539,461, filed Aug. 11, 2009, entitled “System and Method for Verifying Parameters in an Audiovisual Environment,” Inventor: James M. Alexander.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/463,505, filed May 11, 2009, entitled “System and Method for Translating Communications Between Participants in a Conferencing Environment,” Inventor(s): Marthinus F. De Beer et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,089, filed Mar. 18, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Enhancing Video Images in a Conferencing Environment,” Inventor: Joseph T. Friel.
Active8-3D—Holographic Projection—3D Hologram Retail Display & Video Project, [retrieved Feb. 24, 2009], http://www.activ8-3d.co.uk/3d—holocubes, 1 page.
Avrithis, Y., et al., “Color-Based Retrieval of Facial Images,” European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '00), Tampere, Finland; Sep. 2000; 18 pages.
Bakstein, Hynek, et al., “Visual Fidelity of Image Based Rendering,” Center for Machine Perception, Czech Technical University, 10 pages.
Boccaccio, Jeff; CEPro, “Inside HDMI CEC: The Little-Known Control Feature,” http://www.cepro.com/article/print/inside—hdmi—cec—the—little—known—control—feature; Dec. 28, 2007, 2 pages.
Bücken R: “Bildfernsprechen: Videokonferenz vom Arbeilsplatz aus” Funkschau, Weka Fachzeitschriften Verlag, Poing, DE, No. 17, Aug. 14, 1986, pp. 41-43, XP002537729; ISSN: 0016-2841, p. 43, left-hand column, line 34-middle column, line 24; 3pgs.
Chen, Jason, “iBluetooth Lets iPhone Users Send and Receive Files Over Bluetooth,” Mar. 13, 2009; 1 page; http://i.gizmodo.com/5169545/ibluetooth-lets-iphone-users-send-and-receive-files-over-bluetooth.
Cisco: Bill Mauchly and Mad Marathe; UNC: Henry Fuchs, et al., “Depth-Dependent Perspective Rendering,” 6 pgs.
Costa, Cristina, et al., “Quality Evaluation and Nonuniform Compression of Geometrically Distorted Images Using the Quadtree Distorion Map,” EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, vol. 2004, No. 12; pp. 1899-1911; © 2004 Hindawi Publishing Corp.; XP002536356; ISSN: 1110-8657; 16 pages.
Daly, S., et al., “Face-based visually-optimized image sequence coding,” Image Processing, 1998, ICIP 98, Proceedings; 1998 International Conference on Chicago, IL; Oct. 4-7, 1998, Los Alamitos; IEEE Computing; vol. 3, Oct. 4, 1998; pp. 443-447, ISBN: 978-0-8186-8821-8; XP010586786, 5 pages.
Diaz, Jesus, iPhone Bluetooth File Transfer Coming Soon (Yes!); Jan. 25, 2009; 1 page; http://i.gizmodo.com/5138797/iphone-bluetooth-file-transfer-coming-soon-yes.
Diaz, Jesus, “Zcam 3D Camera is Like Wii Without Wiimote and Minority Report Without Gloves,” Dec. 15, 2007, 3 pgs.; http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/zcam-depth-camera-could-be-wii-challenger/zcam-3d-camera-is-like-wii-without-wiimote-and-minority-report-without-gloves-334426.php.
DVE Digital Video Enterprises, “DVE Tele-Immersion Room,” http://www.dvetelepresence.com/products/immersion—room.asp; 2009, 2 pgs.
ECmag.com, “IBS Products,” Published Apr. 2009, 2 pages; http://www.ecmag.com/index.cfm§fa=article&articleID=10065.
Electrophysics Glossary, “Infrared Cameras, Thermal Imaging, Night Vision, Roof Moisture Detection,” printed Mar. 18, 2010, 11 pages; http://www.electrophysics.com/Browse/Brw—Glossary.asp.
Farrukh, A., et al., Automated Segmentation of Skin-Tone Regions in Video Sequences, Proceedings IEEE Students Conference, ISCON—apos—02; Aug. 16-17, 2002; pp. 122-128; 7 pgs.
Fiala, Mark, “Automatic Projector Calibration Using Self-Identifying Patterns,” National Research Council of Canada, 2005; http://www.procams.org/procams2005/papers/procams05-36.pdf; 6 pages.
Gotchev, Atanas, “Computer Technologies for 3D Video Delivery for Home Entertainment,” International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies; CompSysTech '08; 6 pgs; http://ecet.ecs.ru.acad.bg/cst08/docs/cp/Plenary/P.1.pdf.
Gries, Dan, “3D Particles Experiments in AS3 and Flash CS3, Dan's Comments,” printed May 24, 2010 http://www.flashandmath.com/advanced/fourparticles/notes.html; 3pgs.
Guernsey, Lisa, “Toward Better Communication Across the Language Barrier,” Jul. 29, 1999, http://www.nytimes.com/1999/07/29/technology/toward-better-communication-across-the-language-barrier.html; 2 pages.
Habili, Nariman, et al., “Segmentation of the Face and Hands in Sign Language Video Sequences Using Color and Motion Cues” IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Service Center, vol. 14, No. 8, Aug. 1, 2004; ISSN: 1051-8215; pp. 1086-1097; XP011115755; 13 pages.
“Infrared Cameras TVS-200-EX,” printed May 24, 2010; 3 pgs.; http://www.electrophysics.com/Browse/Brw—ProductLineCategory.asp§CategoryID=184&Area=IS.
IR Distribution Category @ Envious Technology, “IR Distribution Category,” 2 pages http://www.envioustechnology.com.au/ products/product-list.php§CID=305, printed on Apr. 22, 2009.
IR Trans—Products and Orders—Ethernet Devices, 2 pages http://www.irtrans.de/en/shop/lan.php, printed Apr. 22, 2009.
Isgro, Francesco et al., “Three-Dimensional Image Processing in the Future of Immersive Media,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 14, No. 3; XP011108796; ISSN: 1051-8215; Mar. 1, 2004; pp. 288-303; 16 pages.
Kauff, Peter, et al., “An Immersive 3D Video-Conferencing System Using Shared Virtual Team User Environments,” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, XP040139458; Sep. 30, 2002; 8 pages.
Kazutake, Uehira, “Simulation of 3D image depth perception in a 3D display using two stereoscopic displays at different depths,” http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006SPIE.6055.408U; 2006, 2 pgs.
Klint, Josh, “Deferred Rendering in Leadwerks Engine,” Copyright Leadwersk Corporation 2008, 10 pages; http://www.leadwerks.com/files/Deferred—Rendering—in—Leadwerks—Engine.pdf.
Koyama, S., et al. “A Day and Night Vision MOS Imager with Robust Photonic-Crystal-Based RGB-and-IR,” Mar. 2008, pp. 754-759; ISSN: 0018-9383; IEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 55, No. 3; 6 pages http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp§tp=&arnumber=4455782&isnumber=4455723.
Lawson, S., “Cisco Plans TelePresence Translation Next Year,” Dec. 9, 2008; http://www.pcworld.com/ article/155237/.html§tk=rss—news; 2 pages.
OptoIQ, “Anti-Speckle Techniques Uses Dynamic Optics,” Jun. 1, 2009, 2 pages; http://www.optoiq.com/index/photonics-technologies-applications/lfw-display/lfw-article-display/363444/articles/optoiq2/photonics-technologies/technology-products/optical-components/optical-mems/2009/12/anti-speckle-technique-uses-dyanmic-optics/QP129867/cmpid=EnlOptoLFWJanuary132010.html.
OptoIQ, “Smart Camera Supports Multiple Interfaces,” Jan. 22, 2009, 2 pages; http://www.optoiq.com/index/machine-vision-imaging-processing/display/vsd-article-display/350639/articles/vision-systems-design/daily-product-2/2009/01/smart-camera-supports-multiple-interfaces.html.
OptoIQ, “Vision + Automation Products—VideometerLab 2,”; 11 pgs.; http://www.optoiq.com/optoiq-2/en-us/index/machine-vision-imaging-processing/display/vsd-articles-tools-template.articles.vision-systems-design.volume-11.issue-10.departments.new-products.vision-automation-products.htmlhtml.
OptoIQ, “Vision Systems Design—Machine Vision and Image Processing Technology,” printed Mar. 18, 2010, 2 pages; http://www.optoiq.com/index/machine-vision-imaging-processing.html.
PCT “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration,” PCT/US2009/001070, dated Apr. 8, 2009, 17 pages.
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; PCT/US2009/038310; dated Oct. 10, 2009; 19 pages.
Radhika, N., et al., “Mobile Dynamic reconfigurable Context aware middleware for Adhoc smart spaces,” vol. 22, 2008, 3 pages http://www.acadjournal.com/2008/V22/part6/p7.
“Robust Face Localisation Using Motion, Colour & Fusion” Dec. 10, 2003; Proc. VIIIth Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications, Sun C. et al (Eds.), Sydney; 10 pgs.; Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.cmis.csiro.au/Hugues.Talbot/dicta2003/cdrom/pdf/0899.pdf; pp. 899-908, XP007905630.
School of Computing, “Bluetooth over IP for Mobile Phones,” 1 page http://www.computing.dcu.ie/wwwadmin/fyp-abstract/list/fyp—details05.jsp§year=2005&number=51470574.
SENA, “Industrial Bluetooth,” 1 page http://www.sena.com/products/industrial—bluetooth, printed on Apr. 22, 2009.
Shaffer, Shmuel, “Translation—State of the Art” presentation; Jan. 15, 2009; 22 pages.
Shi, C. et al., “Automatic Image Quality Improvement for Videoconferencing,” IEEE ICASSP © 2004, 4 pgs.
Smarthome, “IR Extender Expands Your IR Capabilities,” 3 pages http://www.smarthome.com/8121.html, printed Apr. 22, 2009.
Soohuan, Kim, et al., “Block-based face detection scheme using face color and motion estimation,” Real-Time Imaging VIII; Jan. 20-22, 2004, San Jose, CA; vol. 5297, No. 1; Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng USA ISSN: 0277-786X; pp. 78-88; XP007905596; 11pgs.
“Super Home Inspectors or Super Inspectors,” printed Mar. 18, 2010, 3 pages; http://www.umrf.com/PageManager/Default.aspx/PageID=2120325.
Tsapatsoulis, N., et al., “Face Detection for Multimedia Applications,” Proceedings of the ICIP '00; Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sep. 2000; 4 pages.
Tsapatsoulis, N., et al., “Face Detection in Color Images and Video Sequences,” 10th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), 2000; vol. 2; pp. 498-502; 21 pgs.
Wang, Hualu, et al., “A Highly Efficient System for Automatic Face Region Detection inMPEG Video,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology; vol. 7, Issue 4; 1977 pp. 615-628; 26 pgs.
WirelessDevNet, Melody Launches Bluetooth Over IP, http://www.wirelessdevnet.com/news/2001/ 155/news5.html; 2 pages, printed on Jun. 5, 2001.
WO 2008/118887 A3 Publication with PCT International Search Report (4 pages), International Preliminary Report on Patentability (1 page), and Written Opinion of the ISA (7 pages); PCT/US2008/058079; dated Sep. 18, 2008.
Yang, Jie, et al., “A Real-Time Face Tracker,” Proceedings 3rd IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision; 1996; Dec. 2-4, 1996; pp. 142-147; 6 pgs.
Yang, Ming-Hsuan, et al., “Detecting Faces in Images: A Survey,” vol. 24, No. 1; Jan. 2002; pp. 34-58; 25 pgs.
Yang, Ruigang, et al., “Real-Time Consensus-Based Scene Reconstruction using Commodity Graphics Hardware,” Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 10 pgs.
Yoo, Byounghun, et al., “Image-Based Modeling of Urban Building Using Aerial Photographs and Digital Maps,” Transactions in GIS, vol. 10 No. 3, p. 377-394, 2006; 18 pages [retrieved May 17, 2010], http://icad.kaist.ac.kr/publication/paper—data/image—based.pdf.
Andreopoulos, Yiannis, et al., “In-Band Motion Compensated Temporal Filtering,” Signal Processing: Image Communication 19 (2004) 653-673, 21 pages http://medianetlab.ee.ucla.edu/papers/011.pdf.
Arulampalam, M. Sanjeev, et al., “A Tutorial on Particle Filters for Online Nonlinear/Non-Gaussian Bayesian Tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 50, No. 2, Feb. 2002, 15 pages http://www.cs.ubc.ca/˜murphyk/Software/Kalman/ParticleFilterTutorial.pdf.
Boros, S., “Policy-Based Network Management with SNMP,” Proceedings of the EUNICE 2000 Summer School Sep. 13-15, 2000, p. 3.
Cumming, Jonathan, “Session Border Control in IMS, An Analysis of the Requirements for Session Border Control in IMS Networks,” Sections 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 2.1.1, 3.2, 3.3.1, 5.2.3 and pp. 7-8, Data Connection, 2005.
Eisert, Peter, “Immersive 3-D Video Conferencing: Challenges, Concepts and Implementations,” Proceedings of SPIE Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), Lugano, Switzerland, Jul. 2003; 11 pages; http://iphome.hhi.de/eisert/papers/vcip03.pdf.
Garg, Ashutosh, et al., “Audio-Visual ISpeaker Detection Using Dynamic Bayesian Networks,” IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2000 Proceedings, 7 pages http://www.ifp.illinois.edu/˜ashutosh/papers/FGOO.pdf.
Gussenhoven, Carlos, “Chapter 5 Transcription of Dutch Intonation,” Nov. 9, 2003, 33 pages; http://www.ru.nl/publish/pages/516003/todisun-ah.pdf.
Hock, Hans Henrich, “Prosody vs. Syntax: Prosodic rebracketing of final vocatives in English,” 4 pages; [retrieved and printed on Mar. 3, 2011] http://speechprosody2010.illinois.edu/papers/100931.pdf.
Jong-Gook Ko et al., “Facial Feature Tracking and Head Orientation-Based Gaze Tracking,” ITC-CSCC 2000, International Technical Conference on Circuits/Systems, Jul. 11-13, 2000, 4 pages http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/˜knkim/paper/itc-cscc-2000-jgko.pdf.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,722, filed May 17, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Providing Retracting Optics in a Video Conferencing Environment,” Inventor(s): Joseph T. Friel, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,833, filed Sep. 8, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Skip Coding During Video Conferencing in a Network Environment,” Inventor[s]: Dihong Tian, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/870,687, filed Aug. 27, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Producing a Performance Via Video Conferencing in a Network Environment,” Inventor(s): Michael A. Arnao et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/912,556, filed Oct. 26, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Provisioning Flows in a Mobile Network Environment,” Inventors: Balaji Vankat Vankataswami, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,614, filed Nov. 18, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Managing Optics in a Video Environment,” Inventors: Torence Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,100, filed Aug. 31, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Providing Depth Adaptive Video Conferencing,” inventor(s): J. William Mauchly et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/946,679, filed Nov. 15, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Providing Camera Functions in a Video Environment,” Inventors: Peter A.J. Fornell, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/946,695, filed Nov. 15, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Providing Enhanced Audio in a Video Environment,” Inventors: Wei Li, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/907,914, filed Oct. 19, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Providing Videomail in a Network Environment,” Inventors: David J. Mackie et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,786, filed Nov. 19, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Providing Enhanced Video Processing in a Network Environment,” Inventor[s]; David J. Mackie.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/907,919, filed Oct. 19, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Providing Connectivity in a Network Environment,” Inventors: David J. Mackie et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/946,704, filed Nov. 15, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Providing Enhanced Graphics in a Video Environment,” Inventors: John M. Kanalakis, Jr., et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,116, filed Nov. 30, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Gesture Interface Control,” Inventors: Shuan K. Kirby, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/907,925, filed Oct. 19, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Providing a Pairing Mechanism in a Video Environment,” Inventors: Gangfeng Kong et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,037, filed Nov. 3, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Managing Flows in a Mobile Network Environment,” Inventors: Balaji Venkat Venkataswami et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/946,709, filed Nov. 15, 2010, entitled “System and Method for Providing Enhanced Graphics in a Video Environment,” Inventors: John M. Kanalakis, Jr., et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/375,624, filed Sep. 24, 2010, entitled “Mounted Video Unit,” Inventor(s): Ashok T. Desai et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/375,627, filed Sep. 24, 2010, entitled “Mounted Video Unit,” Inventor(s): Ashok T. Desai et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/369,951, filed Sep. 15, 2010, entitled “Video Unit With Integrated Features,” Inventor(s): Kyle A. Buzzard et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/375,458, filed Sep. 22, 2010, entitled “Video Unit With Integrated Features,” Inventor(s): Kyle A. Buzzard et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/375,619, filed Sep. 24, 2010, entitled “Free-Standing Video Unit,” Inventor(s): Ashok T. Desai et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/381,245, filed Dec. 16, 2010, entitled “Interface Element,” Inventor(s): John M. Kanalakis, Jr., et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/381,250, filed Dec. 16, 2010, entitled “Interface Element,” Inventor(s): John M. Kanalakis, Jr., et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/381,254, filed Dec. 16, 2010, entitled “Interface Element,” Inventor(s): John M. Kanalakis, Jr., et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/381,256, filed Dec. 16, 2010, entitled “Interface Element,” Inventor(s): John M. Kanalakis, Jr., et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/381,259, filed Dec. 16, 2010, entitled “Interface Element,” Inventor(s): John M. Kanalakis, Jr., et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/381,260, filed Dec. 16, 2010, entitled “Interface Element,” Inventor(s): John M. Kanalakis, Jr., et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/381,262, filed Dec. 16, 2010, entitled “Interface Element,” Inventor(s): John M. Kanalakis, Jr., et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/381,264, filed Dec. 16, 2010, entitled “Interface Element,” Inventor(s): John M. Kanalakis, Jr., et al.
3G, “World's First 3G Video Conference Service with New TV Commercial,” Apr. 28, 2005, 4 pages; http://www.3g.co.uk/PR/April2005/1383.htm.
Andersson, L., et al., “LDP Specification,” Network Working Group, RFC 3036, Jan. 2001, 133 pages; http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3036.
Awduche, D., et al., “Requirements for Traffic Engineering over MPLS,” Network Working Group, RFC 2702, Sep. 1999, 30 pages; http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc2702.pdf.
Berzin, O., et al., “Mobility Support Using MPLS and MP-BGP Signaling,” Network Working Group, Apr. 28, 2008, 60 pages; http://www.potaroo.net/ietf/all-ids/draft-berzin-malls-mpls-mobility-01.txt.
Chen, Qing, et al., “Real-time Vision-based Hand Gesture Recognition Using Haar-like Features,” Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Warsaw, Poland, May 1-3, 2007, 6 pages; http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB4QFJAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1,93.103%26rep%3Drepl%26type%3Dp df&ei=A28RTLKRDeftnQeXzZGRAw&usg=AFQjCNHpwj5MwjgGp-3goVzSWad6CO-Jzw.
“Custom 3D Depth Sensing Prototype System for Gesture Control,” 3D Depth Sensing, GestureTek, 3 pages; [Retrieved and printed on Dec. 1, 2010]http://www.gesturetek.com/3ddepth/introduction.php.
Digital Video Enterprises, “DVE Eye Contact Silhouette,” 1 page, © DVE 2008; http://www.dvetelepresence.com/products/eyeContactSilhouette.asp.
Gluckman, Joshua, et al., “Rectified Catadioptric Stereo Sensors,” 8 pages, retrieved and printed on May 17, 2010; http://cis.poly.edu/˜gluckman/papers/cvpr00.pdf.
Gundavelli, S., et al., “Proxy Mobile IPv6,” Network Working Group, RFC 5213, Aug. 2008, 93 pages; http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc5213.pdf.
Hepper, D., “Efficiency Analysis and Application of Uncovered Background Prediction in a Low BitRate Image Coder,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 38, No. 9, pp. 1578-1584, Sep. 1990.
Jamoussi, Bamil, “Constraint-Based LSP Setup Using LDP,” MPLS Working Group, Sep. 1999, 34 pages; http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-cr-ldp-03.
Jeyatharan, M., et al., “3GPP TFT Reference for Flow Binding,” MEXT Working Group, Mar. 2, 2010, 11 pages; http:/www.ietf.org/id/draft-jeyatharan-mext-flow-tftemp-reference-00.txt.
Kollarits, R.V., et al., “34.3: An Eye Contact Camera/Display System for Videophone Applications Using a Conventional Direct-View LCD,” © 1995 SID, ISSN0097-0966X/95/2601, pp. 765-768; http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=47A1E7E028C26503975E633895D114EC?doi=10.1.1.42.1772&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Kolsch, Mathias, “Vision Based Hand Gesture Interfaces for Wearable Computing and Virtual Environments,” A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, Nov. 2004, 288 pages; http://fulfillment.umi.com/dissertations/b7afbcb56ba72fdb14d26dfccc6b470f/1291487062/3143800.pdf.
Marvin Imaging Processing Framework, “Skin-colored pixels detection using Marvin Framework,” video clip, YouTube, posted Feb. 9, 2010 by marvinproject, 1 page; http://www.youtube.com/user/marvinproject#p/a/u/0/3ZuQHYNIcrl.
Miller, Paul, “Microsoft Research patents controller-free computer input via EMG muscle sensors,” Engadget.com, Jan. 3, 2010, 1 page; http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/03/microsoft-research-patents-controller-free-computer-input-via-em/.
Oh, Hwang-Seok, et al., “Block-Matching Algorithm Based on Dynamic Search Window Adjustment,” Dept. of CS, KAIST, 1997, 6 pages; http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/similar?doi=10.1.1.29.8621&type=ab.
PCT “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration,” PCT/US2009/001070, dated Apr. 4, 2009, 17 pages.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Aug. 26, 2010 for PCT/US2009/001070; 10 pages.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Oct. 7, 2010 for PCT/US2009/038310; 10 pages.
PCT International Report of Patentability dated May 15, 2006, for PCT International Application PCT/US2004/021585, 6 pages.
PCT International Search Report mailed Aug. 24, 2010 for PCT/US2010033880; 4 pages.
“Real-time Hand Motion/Gesture Detection for HCI-Demo 2,” video clip, YouTube, posted Dec. 17, 2008 by smmy0705, 1 page; www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLT4CFLi8A&feature=related.
“Simple Hand Gesture Recognition,” video clip, YouTube, posted Aug. 25, 2008 by pooh8210, 1 page; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8GVeV0dYLM&feature=related.
Soliman, H., et al., “Flow Bindings in Mobile IPv6 and NEMO Basic Support,” IETF MEXT Working Group, Nov. 9, 2009, 38 pages; http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-04.
Sudan, Ranjeet, “Signaling in MPLS Networks with RSVP-TE-Technology Information,” Telecommunications, Nov. 2000, 3 pages; http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi—mOTLC/is—11—34/ai—67447072/.
Trevor Darrell, “A Real-Time Virtual Mirror Display,” 1 page, Sep. 9, 1998; http://people.csail.mit.edu/trevor/papers/1998-021/node6.html.
Wachs, J., et al., “A Real-time Hand Gesture System Based on Evolutionary Search,” Vision, 3rd Quarter 2006, vol. 22, No. 3, 18 pages; http://web.ics.purdue.edu/˜jpwachs/papers/3q06vi.pdf.
Wang, Robert and Jovan Popovic, “Bimanual rotation and scaling,” video clip, YouTube, posted by rkeltset on Apr. 14, 2010, 1 page; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TPFSCX79U.
Wang, Robert and Jovan Popovic, “Desktop virtual reality,” video clip, YouTube, posted by rkeitset on Apr. 8, 2010, 1 page; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rBtm62Lkfk.
Wang, Robert and Jovan Popovic, “Gestural user input,” video clip, YouTube, posted by rkeltset on May 19, 2010, 1 page; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JWYTtBjdTE.
Wang, Robert and Jovan Popovic, “Manipulating a virtual yoke,” video clip, YouTube, posted by rkeltset on Jun. 8, 2010, 1 page; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfgGOO2uM.
Wang, Robert and Jovan Popovic, “Real-Time Hand-Tracking with a Color Glove, ACM Transaction on Graphics,” 4 pages, [Retrieved and printed on Dec. 1, 2010] http://people.csail.mit.edu/rywang/hand.
Wang, Robert and Jovan Popovic, “Real-Time Hand-Tracking with a Color Glove, ACM Transaction on Graphics” (SIGGRAPH 2009), 28(3), Aug. 2009; 8 pages http://people.csail.mit.edu/rywang/handtracking/s09-hand-tracking.pdf.
Wang, Robert and Jovan Popovic, “Tracking the 3D pose and configuration of the hand,” video clip, YouTube, posted by rkeltset on Mar. 31, 2010, 1 page; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOXwJkWP6Sw.
“Wi-Fi Protected Setup,” from Wikipedia, Sep. 2, 2010, 3 pages http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi—Protected—Setup.
Xia, F., et al., “Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6,” Network Working Group, Oct. 19, 2009, 15 pages; http://tools.ietf.orghtml/draft-xia-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-01.txt.
Yegani, P. et al., “GRE Key Extension for Mobile IPv4,” Network Working Group, Feb. 2006, 11 pages; http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-yegani-gre-key-extension-01.pdf.
Zhong, Ren, et al., “Integration of Mobile IP and MPLS,” Network Working Group, Jul. 2000, 15 pages; http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhong-mobile-ip-mpls-01.
“Oblong Industries is the developer of the g-speak spatial operation environment,” Oblong Industries Information Page, 2 pages, [Retrieved and printed on Dec. 1, 2010] http://oblong.com.
Underkoffler, John, “G-Speak Overview 1828121108,” video clip, Vimeo.com, 1 page, [Retrieved and printed on Dec. 1, 2010] http://vimeo.com/2229299.
Kramer, Kwindla, “Mary Ann de Lares Norris at Thinking Digital,” Oblong Industries, Inc. Web Log, Aug. 24, 2010; 1 page; http://oblong.com/articles/0BS6hEeJmoHoCwgJ.html.
“Mary Ann de Lares Norris,” video clip, Thinking Digital 2010 Day Two, Thinking Digital Videos, May 27, 2010, 3 pages; http://videos.thinkingdigital.co.uk/2010/05/mary-ann-de-lares-norris-oblong/.
Kramer, Kwindla, “Oblong at TED,” Oblong Industries, Inc. Web Log, Jun. 6, 2010, 1 page; http://oblong.com/article/0B22LFIS1NVyrOmR.html.
Video on TED.com, Pranav Mistry: the Thrilling Potential of SixthSense Technology (5 pages) and Interactive Transcript (5 pages), retrieved and printed on Nov. 30, 2010; http://www.ted.com/talks/pranav—mistry—the—thrilling—potential—of—sixthsense—technology.html.
“John Underkoffler points to the future of UI,” video clip and interactive transcript, Video on TED.com, Jun. 2010, 6 pages; http://www.ted.com/talks/john—underkoffler—drive—3d—data—with—a—gesture.html.
Kramer, Kwindla, “Oblong on Bloomberg TV,” Oblong Industries, Inc. Web Log, Jan. 28, 2010, 1 page; http://oblong.com/article/0AN—1KD9q990PEnw.html.
Kramer, Kwindla, “g-speak at RISD, Fall 2009,” Oblong Industries, Inc. Web Log, Oct. 29, 2009, 1 page; http://oblong.com/articie/09uW060q6xRIZYvm.html.
Kramer, Kwindla, “g-speak + TMG,” Oblong Industries, Inc. Web Log, Mar. 24, 2009, 1 page; http://oblong.com/article/08mM77zpYMm7kFtv.html.
“g-stalt version 1,” video clip, YouTube.com, posted by zigg1es on Mar. 15, 2009, 1 page; http://youtube.com/watch?v=k8ZAql4mdvk.
Underkoffler, John, “Carlton Sparrell speaks at MIT,” Oblong Industries, Inc. Web Log, Oct. 30, 2009, 1 page; http://oblong.com/article/09usAB4l1Ukb6CPw.html.
Underkoffler, John, “Carlton Sparrell at MIT Media Lab,” video clip, Vimeo.com, 1 page, [Retrieved and printed Dec. 1, 2010] http://vimeo.com/7355992.
Underkoffler, John, “Oblong at Altitude: Sundance 2009,” Oblong Industries, Inc. Web Log, Jan. 20, 2009, 1 page; http://oblong.com/article/08Sr62ron—2akg0D.html.
Underkoffler, John, “Oblong's tamper system 1801011309,” video clip, Vimeo.com, 1 page, [Retrieved and printed Dec. 1, 2010] http://vimeo.com/2821182.
Feld, Brad, “Science Fact,” Oblong Industries, Inc. Web Log, Nov. 13, 2008, 2 pages,http://oblong.com/article/084H-PKISTb9l4TI.html.
Kwindla Kramer, “g-speak in slices,” Oblong Industries, Inc. Web Log, Nov. 13, 2008, 6 pages; http://oblong.com/article/0866JqfNrFg1NeuK.html.
Underkoffler, John, “Origins: arriving here,” Oblong Industries, Inc. Web Log, Nov. 13, 2008, 5 pages; http://oblong.com/article/085zBpRSY9JeLv2z.html.
Rishel, Christian, “Commercial overview: Platform and Products,” Oblong Industries, Inc., Nov. 13, 2008, 3 pages; http://oblong.com/article/086E19gPvDcktAf9.html.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/036,925, filed Feb. 28, 2011 ,entitled “System and Method for Selection of Video Data in a Video Conference Environment,” Inventor(s) Sylvia Olayinka Aya Manfa N'guessan.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/096,772, filed Apr. 28, 2011, entitled “System and Method for Providing Enhanced Eye Gaze in a Video Conferencing Environment,” Inventor(s): Charles C. Byers.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,002, filed May 12, 2011, entitled “System and Method for Video Coding in a Dynamic Environment,” Inventors: Dihong Tian et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,430, filed Apr. 30, 2011, entitled “System and Method for Transferring Transparency Information in a Video Environment,” Inventors: Eddie Collins et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/096,795, filed Apr. 28, 2011, entitled “System and Method for Providing Enhanced Eye Gaze in a Video Conferencing Environment,” Inventors: Charles C. Byers.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/389,651, filed Apr. 14, 2011, entitled “Video Unit With Integrated Features,” Inventor(s): Kyle A. Buzzard et al.
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/389,654, filed Apr. 14, 2011, entitled “Video Unit With Integrated Features,” Inventor(s): Kyle A. Buzzard et al.
Dornaika F., et al., “Head and Facial Animation Tracking Using Appearance-Adaptive Models and Particle Filters,” 20040627; 20040627-20040602, Jun. 27, 2004, 22 pages; Heudiasy Research Lab, http://eprints.pascal-network.org/archive/00001231/01/rtvhci—chapter8.pdf.
EPO Aug. 15, 2011 Response to EPO Communication mailed Feb. 25, 2011 from European Patent Application No. 09725288.6; 15 pages.
EPO Communication dated Feb. 25, 2011 for EP09725288.6 (published as EP22777308); 4 pages.
Geys et al., “Fast Interpolated Cameras by Combining a GPU Based Plane Sweep With a Max-Flow Regularisation Algorithm,” Sep. 9, 2004; 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission 2004, pp. 534-541.
Hammadi, Nait Charif et al., “Tracking the Activity of Participants in a Meeting,” Machine Vision and Applications, Springer, Berlin, De Lnkd—DOI:10.1007/S00138-006-0015-5, vol. 17, No. 2, May 1, 2006, pp. 83-93, XP019323925 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.106.9832.
Kwolek, B., “Model Based Facial Pose Tracking Using a Particle Filter,” Geometric Modeling and Imaging—New Trends, 2006 London, England Jul. 5-6, 2005, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE LNKD-DOI: 10.1109/GMAI.2006.34 Jul. 5, 2006, pp. 203-208; XP010927285 [Abstract Only].
PCT Sep. 25, 2007 Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report from PCT/US06/45895.
PCT Sep. 2, 2008 International Preliminary Report on Patentability (1 page) and the Written Opinion of the ISA (4 pages) from PCT/US2006/045895.
PCT Sep. 11, 2008 Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report from PCT/US07/09469.
PCT Nov. 4, 2008 International Preliminary Report on Patentability (1 page) and the Written Opinion of the ISA (8 pages) from PCT/US2007/009469.
PCT May 11, 2010 International Search Report from PCT/US2010/024059; 4 pages.
PCT Aug. 23, 2011 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the ISA from PCT/US2010/024059; 6 pages.
Website: http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/67266/criminis—techrep2003-59.pdf, A. Criminisi, et al., “Efficient Dense-Stereo and Novel-view Synthesis for Gaze Manipulation in One-to-one Teleconferencing,” Technical Report MSR-TR-2003-59, Sep. 2003 [retrieved Feb. 26, 2009], 41 pages.
Website: http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/CVSSP/VMRG/Publications/miller05cvmp.pdf, Gregor Miller, et al., “Interactive Free-Viewpoint Video,” Centre for Vision, Speech and Signal Processing, [retrieved Feb. 26, 2009], 10 pages.
Website: http://www.merl.com/projects/3dtv, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, copyright 2009 [Retrieved Feb. 26, 2009], 2 pages.
Website: http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/dlpdmd/17—Digital—Light—Processing—MEMS—display—technology.pdf, Hornbeck, Larry J., “Digital Light Processing™: A New MEMS-Based Display Technology,” [retrieved Feb. 26, 2009], 22 pages.
Website: http://www.activ8-3d.co.uk/3d—holocubes, active8-3D—Holographic Projection—3D Hologram Retail Display & Video Project, [retrieved Feb. 24, 2009], 1 page.
Website: http://gizmodo.com/5070906/dreamoc-3d-display-turns-any-phone-into-hologram-machine, Wilson, Mark, “Dreamoc 3D Display Turns Any Phone Into Hologram Machine,” Oct. 30, 2008 [retrieved Feb. 24, 2009], 2 pages.
Website: http://www.t-immersion.com/en,video-gallery,36.html, Total immersion, Video Gallery, copyright 2008-2009 [retrieved Feb. 26, 2009], 1 page.
Website: http://www.minoru3d.com/, “Minoru from Novo is the worlds first consumer 3D Webcam,” Dec. 11, 2008 [retrieved Feb. 24, 2009], 4 pages.
Website: http://www.zebraimaging.com/html/lighting—display.html, “Dynamic Displays,” copyright 2005-2008 [retrieved Feb. 24, 2009], 2 pages.
Website: http://www.rayvel.com/b2b.html, “Rayvel Business-to-Business Products,” copyright 2004 [retrieved Feb. 24, 2009], 2 pages.
Website: http://innovation.swmed.edu/research/instrumentation/res—inst—dev3d.html, Holographic Imaging, “Dynamic Holography for scientific uses, military heads up display and even someday HoloTV Using Ti's DMD,” [retrieved Feb. 26, 2009], 5 pages.
Website: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/ielx5/4142827/4141005/04142840.pdf?tp, IEEE Xplore—Login, Article Information, copyright 2009 [retrieved Feb. 26, 2009], 1 page.
Website: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118566619/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0, Wiley InterScience :: Session Cookies, “Session Cookie Error,” copyright 1999-2009 [retrieved Feb. 26, 2009], 1 page.
Website: http://ntsa.metapress.com/app/home/main.asp?referrer=default, National Training Systems Association Home—Main, Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference, Dec. 1-4, 2008 [retrieved Feb. 26, 2009], 1 page.
Hiroyasu Itoh, et al., “Use of a gain modulating framing camera for time-resolved imaging of cellular phenomena,” SPIE vol. 2979, 1997, pp. 733-740 (8 pages).
E. Trucco, et al., “Real-Time Disparity Maps for Immersive 3-D Teleconferencing by Hybrid Recursive Matching and Census Transform,” Undated, 9 pages.
Jim Gemmell, et al., “Gaze Awareness for Video-conferencing: A Software Approach,” IEEE Multimedia, Oct.-Dec. 2000, 10 pages.
Professor Wilson T. Freeman, Computer Vision Lecture Slides, “6.869 Advances in Computer Vision: Learning and Interfaces,” Spring 2005, 21 pages.
Jeroen Keijser, et al., “Exploring 3D Interaction in Alternate Control-Display Space Mappings,” IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, Mar. 10-11, 2007, pp. 17-24 (8 pages).
Arrington, Michael, “eJamming—Distributed Jamming,” TechCrunch; Mar. 16, 2006; http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/16/ejamming-distributed-jamming/; 1 page.
Beesley, S.T.C., et al., “Active Macroblock Skipping in the H.264 Video Coding Standard,” in Proceedings of 2005 Conference on Visualization, Imaging, and Image Processing—VIIP 2005, Sep. 7-9, 2005, Benidorm, Spain, Paper 480-261, ACTA Press, ISBN: 0-88986-528-0; 5 pages.
Chan et al., “Experiments on Block-Matching Techniques for Video Coding,” Multimedia Systems, vol. 2, 1994, pp. 228-241.
Chen et al., “Toward a Compelling Sensation of Telepresence: Demonstrating a Portal to a Distant (Static) Office,” Proceedings Visualization 2000; VIS 2000; Salt Lake City, UT, Oct. 8-13, 2000; Annual IEEE Conference on Visualization, Los Alamitos, CA; IEEE Comp. Soc., US, Jan. 1, 2000, pp. 327-333; http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.35.1287.
“Cisco Expo Germany 2009 Opening,” Posted on YouTube on May 4, 2009; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDKsaSlz4MK; 2 pages.
eJamming Audio, Learn More; [retrieved and printed on May 27, 2010] http://www.ejamming.com/learnmore/; 4 pages.
Foote, J., et al., “Flycam: Practical Panoramic Video and Automatic Camera Control,” in Proceedigns of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, vol. III, Jul. 30, 2000; pp. 1419-1422; http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/versions?doi=10.1.1.138.8686.
“France Telecom's Magic Telepresence Wall,” Jul. 11, 2006; http://www.humanproductivitylab.com/archive—blogs/2006/07/11/france—telecoms—magic—telepres—1.php; 4 pages.
Guili, D., et al., “Orchestral: A Distributed Platform for Virtual Musical Groups and Music Distance Learning over the Internet in JavaTM Technology” ; [retrieved and printed on Jun. 6, 2010] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=778626; 2 pages.
He, L., et al., “The Virtual Cinemalographer: A Paradigm for Automatic Real-Time Camera Control and Directing,” Proc. SIGGRAPH, © 1996; http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/lhe/papers/siggraph96.vc.pdf; 8 pages.
Jiang, Manqiang, et al., “On Lagrange Multiplier and Quantizer Adjustment for H.264 Frame-layer Video Rate Control,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 16, Issue 5, May 2006, pp. 663-669.
Kannangara, C.S., et al., “Complexity Reduction of H.264 Using Lagrange Multiplier Methods,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Visual Information Engineering, Apr. 2005; www.rgu.ac.uk/files/h264—complexity—kannangara.pdf; 6 pages.
Kannangara, C.S., et al., “Low Complexity Skip Prediction for H.264 through Lagrangian Cost Estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 16, No. 2, Feb. 2006; www.rgu.ac.uk/files/h264—skippredict—richardson—final.pdf; 20 pages.
Kim, Y.H., et al., “Adaptive mode decision for H.264 encoder,” Electronics letters, vol. 40, Issue 19, pp. 1172-1173, Sep. 2004; 2 pages.
Lee, J. and Jeon, B., “Fast Mode Decision for H.264,” ISO/IEC MPEG and ITU-T VCEG Joint Video Team, Doc. JVT-J033, Dec. 2003; http://media.skku.ac.kr/publications/paper/IntC/ljy—ICME2004.pdf; 4 pages.
Liu, Z., “Head-Size Equalization for Better Visual Perception of Video Conferencing,” Proceedings, IEEEInternational Conference on Multimedia & Expo (ICME2005), Jul. 6-8, 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; http://research.microsoft.com/users/cohen/HeadSizeEqualizationICME2005.pdf; 4 pages.
Mann, S., et al., “Virtual Bellows: Constructing High Quality Still from Video,” Proceedings, First IEEE International Conference on Image Processing ICIP-94, Nov. 13-16, 1994, Austin, TX; http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.50.8405; 5 pages.
“Opera Over Cisco TelePresence at Cisco Expo 2009, in Hannover Germany—Apr. 28, 29,” posted on YouTube on May 5, 2009; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xN5jNH5E-38; 1 page.
Payatagool, Chris, “Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Light of Telepresence,” Telepresence Options, Nov. 12, 2008; http://www.telepresenceoptions.com/2008/11/orchestral—manoeuvres; 2pages.
PCT “International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration,” PCT/US2010/026456, dated Jun. 29, 2010, 11 pages.
PCT Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/064061 dated Feb. 11, 2010, 4 pages.
PCT Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/064061 dated Feb. 23, 2010; 14 pages.
Pixel Tools “Rate Control and H.264: H.264 rate control algorithm dynamically adjusts encoder parameters,” [retrieved and printed on Jun. 10, 2010] http://www.pixeltools.om/rate—control—paper.html; 7 pages.
Richardson, L.E.G., et al., “Fast H.264 Skip Mode Selection Using and Estimation Framework,” Picture Coding Symposium, (Beijing, China), Apr. 2006; www.rgu.ac.uk/files/richardson—fast—skip—estimation—pcs06.pdf; 6 pages.
Satoh, Kiyohide et al., “Passive Depth Acquisition for 3D Image Displays”, IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, Information Systems Society, Tokyo, JP, Sep. 1, 1994, vol. E77-D, No. 9, pp. 949-957.
Schroeder, Erica, “The Next Top Model—Collaboration,” Collaboration, The Workspace: A New World of Communications and Collaboration, Mar. 9, 2009; http://blogs.cisco.com/collaboration/comments/the—next—top—model; 3 pages.
Shum, H.-Y, et al., “A Review of Image-Based Rendering Techniques,” in SPIE Proceedings vol. 4067(3); Proceedings of the Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing 2000, Jun. 20-23, 2000, Perth, Australia; pp. 2-13; https://research.microsoft.com/pubs/68826/review—image—rendering.pdf.
Sonoma Wireworks Forums, “Jammin on Rifflink,” [retrieved and printed on May 27, 2010] http://www.sonomawireworks.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=2659; 5 pages.
Sonoma Wireworks Rifflink, [retrieved and printed on Jun. 2, 2010] http://www.sonomawireworks.com/rifflink.php; 3 pages.
Sullivan, Gary J., et al., “Video Compression—From Concepts to the H.264/AVC Standard,” Proceedings IEEE, vol. 93, No. 1, Jan. 2005; http://ip.hhi.de/imagecom—G1/assets/pdfs/pieee—sullivan—wiegand—2005.pdf; 14 pages.
Sun, X., et al., “Region of Interest Extraction and Virtual Camera Control Based on Panoramic Video Capturing,” IEEE Trans. Multimedia, Oct. 27, 2003; http://vision.ece.ucsb.edu/publications/04mmXdsun.pdf; 14 pages.
Westerink, P.H., et al., “Two-pass MPEG-2 variable-bitrate encoding,” IBM Journal of Research and Development, Jul. 1991, vol. 43, No. 4; http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.128.421; 18 pages.
Wiegand, T., et al., “Efficient mode selection for block-based motion compensated video coding,” Proceedings, 2005 International Conference on Image Processing IIP 2005, pp. 2559-2562; citeseer.ist.psu.edu/wiegand95efficient.html.
Wiegand, T., et al., “Rate-distortion optimized mode selection for very low bit rate video coding and the emerging H.263 standard,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., Apr. 1996, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 182-190.
Xin, Jun, et al., “Efficient macroblock coding-mode decision for H.264/AVC video coding,” Technical Repot MERL 2004-079, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Jan. 2004; www.merl.com/publications/TR2004-079/; 12 pages.
Yang, Xiaokang, et al., Rate Control for H.264 with Two-Step Quantization Parameter Determination but Single-Pass Encoding, EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, Jun. 2006; http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/asp/2006/063409.pdf; 13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,257, filed May 20, 2010, entitled “Implementing Selective Image Enhancement,” Inventors: Dihong Tian et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,022, filed Nov. 16, 2011, entitled “System and Method for Alerting a Participant in a Video Conference,” Inventor(s): TiongHu Lian, et al.
PCT Sep. 13, 2011 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and the Written Opinion of the ISA from PCT/US2010/026456; 5 pages.
PCT Oct. 12, 2011 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA from PCT/US2011/050380.
PCT Nov. 24, 2011 International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/033880; 6 pages.
“Eye Tracking,” from Wikipedia, (printed on Aug. 31, 2011) 12 pages; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye—tracker.
“RoundTable, 360 Degrees Video Conferencing Camera unveiled by Microsoft,” TechShout, Jun. 30, 2006, 1 page; http://www.techshout.com/gadgets/2006/30/roundtable-360-degrees-video-conferencing-camera-unveiled-by-microsoft/#.
“Vocative Case,” from Wikipedia, [retrieved and printed on Mar. 3, 2011] 11 pages; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vocative—case.
Lambert, “Polycom Video Communications,” © 2004 Polycom, Inc., Jun. 20, 2004 http://www.polycom.com/global/documents/whitepapers/video—communications—h.239—people—content—polycom—patented—technology.pdf.
Liu, Shan, et al., “Bit-Depth Scalable Coding for High Dynamic Range Video,” SPIE Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing, Jan. 2008; 12 pages http://www.merl.com/papers/docs/TR2007-078.pdf.
Nakaya, Y., et al. “Motion Compensation Based on Spatial Transformations,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Jun. 1994, Abstract Only http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F76%2F7495%2F00305878.pdf%3Farnumber%3D305878&authDecision=-203.
Patterson, E.K., et al., “Moving-Talker, Speaker-Independent Feature Study and Baseline Results Using the CUAVE Multimodal Speech Corpus,” EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, vol. 11, Oct. 2002, 15 pages http://www.clemson.edu/ces/speech/papers/CUAVE—Eurasip2002.pdf.
Perez, Patrick, et al., “Data Fusion for Visual Tracking with Particles,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. XX, No. XX, Feb. 2004, 18 pages http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.6.2480.
Potamianos, G., et a., “An Image Transform Approach for HMM Based Automatic Lipreading,” in Proceedings of IEEE ICIP, vol. 3, 1998, 5 pages http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.13.6802.
“Rikert, T.D., et al., ““Gaze Estimation using Morphable models,”” IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Apr. 1998; 7 pgs. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.30.9472”.
Tan, Kar-Han, et al., “Appearance-Based Eye Gaze Estimation,” In Proceedings IEEE WACV'02, 2002, 5 pages. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.19.8921.
Veratech Corp., “Phantom Sentinel,” © VeratechAero 2006, 1 page; http://www.veratechcorp.com/phantom.html.
Vertegaal, Roel, et al., “GAZE-2: Conveying Eye Contact in Group Video Conferencing Using Eye-Controlled Camera Direction,” CHI 2003, Apr. 5-10, 2003, Fort Lauderdale, FL; Copyright 2003 ACM 1-58113-630-7/03/0004; 8 pages; http://www.hml.queensu.ca/papers/vertegaalchi0403.pdf.
Chien et al., “Efficient moving Object Segmentation Algorithm Using Background Registration Technique,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 12, No. 7, Jul. 2002, 10 pages.
EPO Jul. 10, 2012 Response to EP Communication from European Application EP10723445.2.
EPO Sep. 24, 2012 Response to Mar. 20, 2012 EP Communication from European Application EP09725288.6.
PRC Aug. 3, 2012 SIPO First Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200980119121.5; 16 pages.
PRC Dec. 18, 2012 Response to SIPO First Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200980119121.5; 16 pages.
““Eye Gaze Response Interface Computer Aid (Erica) tracks Eye movement to enable hands-free computer operation,” UMD Communication Sciences and Disorders Tests New Technology, University of Minnesota Duluth, posted Jan. 19, 2005; 4 pages http://www.d.umn.edu/unirel/homepage/05/eyegaze.html”.
Gvili, Ronen et al., “Depth Keying,” 3DV System Ltd., [Retrieved and printed on Dec. 5, 2011] 11 pages; http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/eyalofek/Depth%20Key/DepthKey.pdf.
Richardson, Iain, et al., “Video Encoder Complexity Reduction by Estimating Skip Mode Distortion,” Image Communication Technology Group; [Retrieved and printed Oct. 21, 2010] 4 pages; http://www4.rgu.ac.uk/files/ICIP04—richardson—zhao—final.pdf.
EPO Nov. 3, 2011 Communication from European Application EP10710949.8; 2 pages.
EPO Mar. 12, 2012 Response to EP Communication dated Nov. 3, 2011 from European Application EP10710949.8; 15 pages.
EPO Mar. 20, 2012 Communication from European Application 09725288.6; 6 pages.
PCT Jan. 23, 2012 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA from International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/060579; 10 pages.
PCT Jan. 23, 2012 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA from International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/060584; 11 pages.
PCT Feb. 20, 2012 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA from International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/061442; 12 pages.
PCT Mar. 21, 2013 International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/050380.
PCT May 30, 2013 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion from the International Searching Authority for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/061442 8 pages.
PCT May 30, 2013 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion from the International Searching Authority for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/060579 6 pages.
PCT May 30, 2013 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion from the International Searching Authority for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/060584 7 pages.
PRC Jan. 7, 2013 SIPO Second Office Action from Chinese Application Serial No. 200980105262.1.
PRC Apr. 3, 2013 SIPO Second Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200980119121.5; 16 pages.
PRC Jun. 18, 2013 Response to SIPO Second Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200980119121.5; 5 pages.
PRC Jul. 9, 2013 SIPO Third Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200980119121.5; 15 pages.
“Weinstein et al., ““Emerging Technologies for Teleconferencing and Telepresence,”” Wainhouse Research 2005 http://www.ivci.com/pdf/whitepaper-emerging-technologies-for-teleconferencing-and-telepresence.pdf”.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100225732 A1 Sep 2010 US