The present invention relates to radiotherapy systems, and more particularly, to systems and methods for normalizing radiation beam measurements to compensate for variations in radiation output.
Linear accelerator (LINAC) relative dosimetry (beam scanning) involves acquiring a measurement of the radiation beam with a field detector and typically a reference detector. The measurement is acquired as two parameters are varied: the field detector's position and time. Using the measured signal from the field detector, a plot of the LINAC's radiation beam intensity versus position within that beam is possible, with an example shown in
Beam scanning often requires normalizing the measured signal from a field detector by the measured signal from a reference detector. This occurs because the output of the LINAC may change with time, sometimes abruptly. For example, an increase in the LINAC radiation dose rate during a scan results in an increase in the field detector's measured signal. If only a field detector is used, the beam scan will show a change in the beam intensity at that point in space that corresponds to when the LINAC's radiation output changed. This irregularity in the measurement is not indicative of the actual relative dose intensity of the radiation beam. In
Small changes in LINAC dose rate do not affect the radiation therapy treatment. The change in the dose rate effectively changes the amount of time in which the radiation dose is delivered, which is not important to the treatment parameters being measured. The more important parameter during beam scanning is the relative dose intensity of the beam. Using only a field detector may misrepresent this characteristic of the LINAC's radiation beam, as in
To correct for changes in a LINAC's dose rate, a reference detector is used to normalize dose rate changes. For example, referring to
In view of the foregoing, it is an object of the present invention to provide radiotherapy systems with improved systems and methods for radiation beam measurement normalization. According to an embodiment of the present invention, a radiotherapy system includes a radiotherapy device, such as a LINAC, operable to direct a radiation beam from a head thereof during operation, a field detector positioned to be within the radiation beam during operation of the radiotherapy device and operable to generate a beam measurement signal, a reference detector positioned to be outside of the radiation beam during operation of the radiotherapy device and operable to generate a reference signal, and at least one computer in signal communication with the field detector and the reference detector and configured with software to normalize the beam measurement signal based on the reference signal and to output a normalized beam measurement.
According to a method aspect, a computer-based method for normalizing a radiation beam measurement includes using at least one computer configured with software to receive a beam measurement signal from a field detector positioned within the radiation beam, receive a reference signal from a reference detector positioned outside of the radiation beam, normalize the beam measurement signal based on the reference signal, and output a normalized beam measurement.
These and other objects, aspects and advantages of the present invention will be better appreciated in view of the drawings and following detailed description of preferred embodiments.
Referring to
The radiotherapy device 12 is advantageously a linear accelerator (LINAC) used in connection with beam scanning during operation (i.e., measuring the relative dose intensity). Generation and movement of the radiation beam and rotation of the head 26 are performed by a LINAC controller 32 capable of sending and receiving control signals to the LINAC 12 to effect device operation.
The beam scanning system 14 includes an electrometer 34 connected to the field and reference detectors 16, 20 by respective cables 36, 40. The acquired electrical charge of the detectors 16, 20 is thereby supplied the electrometer 34 for measurement, with the measured values being output to the computer 22. If it is necessary to provide a polarizing voltage to the field and reference detectors 16, 20, the polarizing voltage is provided via their respective cables 36, 40 and the electrometer 34.
The field and reference detectors 16, 20 are both configured to detect ionizing radiation which, as indicated above, will alter the acquired charge of the detectors. The field detector 16 is placed where it will be in the radiation beam 24 emitted by the LINAC 12 during operation. The reference detector 20 is placed at location that will be outside of the radiation beam 24 during operation, but still exposed to head scatter 30; for instance, on top of the head 26. In a LINAC, the head scatter is produced by interactions between the LINAC-generated beam and components of the LINAC head. Notably, the depicted beam 24 and head scatter 30 are provided for illustrative purposes, and not intended to reflect actual geometries).
As used herein, the term “computer” (e.g., the computer 22) is used to broadly indicate at least one hardware processor capable of executing program instructions, machine-readable memory media for storing such instructions and related data used and/or generated during the operation thereof. Typically, a computer will also include one or more input/output devices, such as video displays, keyboards, pointing devices and the like. A “computer” can encompass multiple, physically discrete and separately housed processors, memory media and the like that are in signal communication (for instance, via a network) to perform the enumerated functions. Additionally, the computer 22 can be structurally and/or functionally integrated with some or all of the beam scanning system 14 and/or LINAC controller 32.
The computer 22 is configured with software to output a normalized beam measurement based on the beam measurement signal and the reference signal. In particular, the software directs the calculation of the ratio of the beam measurement signal from the field detector and the reference signal from the reference detector. This effectively normalizes the beam measurement since changes in dose rate will affect the numerator and the denominator in the same proportion. This is because the dose rate of the beam and the heat scatter rate are linearly proportional. Minor changes in beam shape, on the other hand, will not affect the head scatter rate.
The present invention can offer several advantages over normalization that requires locating the reference detector within the radiation beam. For example, accurate beam normalization is still possible even where the radiation beam size too small to accommodate both a field detector and a reference detector. Also, it is not necessary to reposition the reference detector as the beam size changes. The reference detector can be securely mounted in a fixed location, making unintentional movement of the reference detector less likely. Additionally, as mentioned above, the reference detector will not be sensitive to fluctuations in beam shape during scanning, which might otherwise affect the reference detector independently of the field detector.
The above described embodiments are presented for illustrative and exemplary purposes; the present invention is not necessarily limited thereto. Rather, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications, as well as adaptations to particular circumstances, will fall within the scope of the invention herein shown and described and of the claims appended hereto.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/875,840, filed on May 2, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/641,511, filed on May 2, 2012, the contents of which applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1239145 | Wantz | Sep 1917 | A |
2818510 | Verse | Dec 1957 | A |
3783251 | Pavkovich | Jan 1974 | A |
3980885 | Steward et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4058832 | Vagi | Nov 1977 | A |
4455609 | Inamura et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4887287 | Cobben | Dec 1989 | A |
5099505 | Seppi et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5160337 | Cosman | Nov 1992 | A |
5388142 | Morris | Feb 1995 | A |
5627367 | Sofield | May 1997 | A |
5704890 | Bliss et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712482 | Gaiser et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
6131690 | Galando et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6257552 | Crow et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261219 | Meloul et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6535756 | Simon et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6609626 | Young et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6799068 | Hartmann et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6990368 | Simon et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7016454 | Warnberg | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7065812 | Newkirk et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7453976 | Yin | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7515681 | Ebstein | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7579608 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7945022 | Nelms et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8044359 | Simon | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8130905 | Nelms | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8136773 | Schmutzer et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8218718 | Van Herk et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8235530 | Maad | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8242458 | Rinecker et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8321179 | Simon et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8430564 | Simmons et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8457713 | Kagermeier | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8474794 | Liljedahl | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8536547 | Maurer, Jr. et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8541756 | Treas | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8605857 | Renner | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8726814 | Matteo | May 2014 | B1 |
8794899 | Cozza et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8833709 | Weng | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8840304 | Perez Zarate et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8874385 | Takayanagi et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8927921 | Nelms et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9050460 | Hildreth | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9097384 | Simon et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
20050111621 | Riker et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060203967 | Nilsson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070041499 | Lu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070086577 | Kobayashi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080031406 | Yan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080118137 | Chen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090250618 | Simon | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110022360 | Simon et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110096906 | Langeveld | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110210258 | Black et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110248188 | Brusasco et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110306864 | Zarate et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014618 | Sun et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120025105 | Brown et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120292517 | Izaguirre | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120326057 | Remeijer et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130048883 | Simon et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140073834 | Hildreth et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140263990 | Kawrykow et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150087879 | Nelms | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150283403 | Kapatoes et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309193 | Kozelka et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102009039345 | Mar 2011 | DE |
1060726 | Jun 2004 | EP |
2078537 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2117649 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2708919 | Mar 2014 | EP |
05-154209 | Jun 1993 | JP |
2003310590 | Nov 2003 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Brusasco, C, et al. “A Dosimetry System for Fast Measurement of 3D Depth-dose Profiles in Charged-particle Tumor Therapy with Scanning Techniques.” Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, Section-B:Beam Interactions With Materials and Atom 168.4 (2000): 578-92. |
Nelms, Benjamin. “Variation in External Beam Treatment, Plan Quality: An Inter-institutional Study of Planners and Planning Systems.” Practical Radiation Oncology 2.4 (2012): 296-305. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150238778 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61641511 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14081416 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 14706907 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13875840 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 14081416 | US |