This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/764,209 filed on Feb. 13, 2013, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/805,770, filed Mar. 27, 2013, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/809,054 filed on Apr. 5, 2013, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates generally to methods of enhanced performance systems using RF beamforming and/or digital signal processing, in both MIMO and non-MIMO systems.
Active antenna systems may implement 1-dimensional and 2-dimensional multi-beam base stations that focus transmission and reception into narrow sub-sectors, facilitate reduced interference to neighboring cells, and enable reuse of the radio spectrum at its own cell by activating independent simultaneous co-channel non-overlapping beams.
Base stations may separate transmission and reception by using different frequencies or different time divisions for transmission and reception. For example, cellular protocols, such as GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications), WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access), and LTE (Long-Term Evolution), may sync (synchronize) all transmission and receiving channels using time-division. Wi-Fi base stations, which may incorporate a multi-beamforming cluster of co-located, co-channel Wi-Fi access points, may not inherently include such syncing capabilities and may operate inefficiently when in close proximity, due to the nature of the CSMA/CA (Carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance) property of the Wi-Fi protocol. The CSMA/CA property may require yielding to all first-come Wi-Fi data transmission in order to avoid transmission collisions or jamming. Further, while co-located, co-channel Wi-Fi access points may provide super-isolation of data transmission via RF manipulation methods, side-lobe interference in adjacent beams may occur in regions nearer to the base stations. Performance may be improved if different radio channels are utilized for data transmission occurring in closer proximity to the base station.
A multibeam access point may include a plurality of co-located, beamforming transceivers, each configured to transmit data to a user equipment on a first channel. The multibeam access point may further include a cluster transceiver co-located with the beamforming transceivers, configured to transmit data to the user equipment on a second channel. A processor or controller may monitor whether at least two of the beamforming transceivers have detected data transmission from the user equipment. Based on the monitoring, the processor may allow the cluster transceiver to transmit data to the user equipment by, for example, engaging in operations that require the user equipment to register on a different antenna beam and channel than the user equipment originally intended. Further, as the user equipment moves to new locations, the processor may direct the user equipment to a different antenna beam and channel.
The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects, features, and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings in which:
It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements may be exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.
In the following description, various aspects of the present invention will be described. For purposes of explanation, specific configurations and details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will also be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without the specific details presented herein. Furthermore, well known features may be omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the present invention.
Unless specifically stated otherwise, as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the specification discussions utilizing terms such as “processing,” “computing,” “calculating,” “determining,” or the like, refer to the action and/or processes of a computer or computing system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and/or transforms data represented as physical, such as electronic, quantities within the computing system's registers and/or memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computing system's memories, registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
Embodiments of the invention may be described in reference to the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineer) 802.11 standard for implementing wireless local area networks (WLAN). The IEEE 802.11 standard may also be known as the Wi-Fi standard. “802.11xx” may refer to any version of the 802.11 standard, such as 802.11a, 802.11g, or 802.11ac, for example. Versions of the 802.11 standard may operate using a technique called Collision Sense Multiple Access/Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA), a networking method which aims to prevent transmission collisions before they occur. While embodiments of the invention are described in terms of the 802.11 protocol, other network protocols built on the CSMA/CA concept may be used.
Access points (AP's) or transceivers may be grouped together or co-located on a base station to form a multi-beam access point (MBAP). As used herein, transceiver and AP may be used interchangeably as any device having independent transmit and receive functions and capable of acting as a 802.11xx access point. Further as used herein, “beamforming” may refer to the ability to direct data towards a narrow azimuth with high gain or power. Transceivers or access points may be co-located if, under ordinary usage of the CSMA/CA technique, data transmission from one transceiver prevents simultaneous data transmission from another transceiver on the same channel or frequency. The transceivers' co-location or proximity to each other may cause, for example, RF interference, a busy CCA, or an updated NAV. Co-located transceivers may be clustered or grouped together into one base station that serves UE's in a limited geographical area. Co-located transceivers may share processing tasks or may each have separate processing capabilities.
Each AP or transceiver may be coupled to an individual antenna to broadcast or transmit data to a user equipment (UE). A beamforming antenna may be a directive antenna to focus radio energy on a narrow azimuth covering an intended user on a UE. Broadcasting on a narrow azimuth may enable one or the same frequency channel (e.g., the same or overlapping frequency spectrum) to be used simultaneously or concurrently on a different azimuth beam which points to a different UE. A cluster antenna may broadcast on a wider azimuth with lower power than a beamforming antenna.
The IEEE 802.11 standard may determine which frequency channels that AP's may communicate on to minimize interference. For example, the 802.11 standard may require that AP's communicating on non-overlapping frequency channels may only transmit data at 2.4 Ghz in channels 1, 6, or 11 out of a possible 13 channels. For a cluster or group of co-located transceivers or AP's communicating on the same frequency channel, e.g., channel 1, overlapping transmission azimuths in each beam's sidelobes may cause interference between the AP's.
Access points or transceivers that make up MBAP 100 may use a CSMA/CA wireless network, including IEEE 802.11 Wi-Fi networks. The 802.11 standard may require each access point to determine whether a radio channel is clear, prior to broadcasting or transmitting data in the channel. The AP may do this by performing a clear channel assessment (CCA), which includes two functions: listening to received energy on an RF interface (termed “energy detection”), or detecting and decoding an incoming Wi-Fi signal preamble from a nearby access point. Due to the CCA function, a UE 104b in SLC area 106 may be communicating with an access point on beam 104b, but may prevent an access point from transmitting on beam 104c using the same frequency channel. Further, UE 104b's own CCA function may prevent transmission if it detects data transmission from beam 104c. In contrast, UE 104a, located outside of SLC area 106, may not experience these interference issues due to the absence of side-lobe interference.
Embodiments of the invention may provide a system or method of detecting UE's, such as UE 104b, within SLC area 106 and communicating with co-located and co-channel beamforming access points. To avoid the interference problems described above, a controller or processor may allow UE 104b to switch to a cluster access point which may communicate on a different frequency than the beamforming access points. Since the CCA function of the 802.11 standard may detect a preamble from other access points even at a low power level, CCA detection may occur at a longer range than the SLC area 106. Embodiments of the invention may be configured to switch UE 104b to a cluster transceiver or access point at a modified SLC area 108 to account for all CCA detection areas.
According to some embodiments, shown in
While
Each beamforming transceiver or access point 302a-h may be coupled to a directive antenna 304a-h, and each directive antenna 304a-h may form directive beams to transmit data to a UE 306. Cluster transceiver 303 may be coupled to a cluster antenna 305 which may form a beam covering a wider azimuth and at lower gain than the directive beams originating from directive antennas 304a-h. A UE 306 may be a cell phone, smart phone, tablet or any device with Wi-Fi capability and able to communicate with a Wi-Fi access point, or another wireless capable device. UE's 306 may be recognized in a WLAN as a Station (STA) device, according to the IEEE 802.11xx protocol. Each transceiver 302a-h and 303 may operate according to the IEEE 802.11xx protocol, or other protocol using CSMA/CA. A MBAP controller 308 may interface with or control each transceiver 302a-h and 303. MBAP controller 308 may include a processor 311a and memory 311b. The transceivers 302a-h and 303 may each include for example a transmitter 309, receiver 310, antenna interface or RF circuitry 312, and a processor 314 and memory 316, although other or different equipment may be used. Processor 314 may be a general purpose processor configured to perform embodiments of the invention for example by executing code or software stored in memory 316, or may be other processors, e.g. a dedicated processor. In other embodiments, transceivers may share a processor 314 and memory 316 to implement software.
Transceivers 302a-h and 303 may each include one or more controller(s) or processor(s) 314, respectively, for executing operations and one or more memory unit(s) 316, respectively, for storing data and/or instructions (e.g., software) executable by a processor. Processor(s) 314 may include, for example, a central processing unit (CPU), a digital signal processor (DSP), a microprocessor, a controller, a chip, a microchip, an integrated circuit (IC), or any other suitable multi-purpose or specific processor or controller. Memory unit(s) 316 may include, for example, a random access memory (RAM), a dynamic RAM (DRAM), a flash memory, a volatile memory, a non-volatile memory, a cache memory, a buffer, a short term memory unit, a long term memory unit, or other suitable memory units or storage units. Processor(s) 314 may be general purpose processors configured to perform embodiments of the invention by for example executing code or software stored in memory, or may be other processors, e.g. dedicated processors.
According to the IEEE 802.11 protocol, channels 1, 6, and 11 may be examples of non-overlapping channels operating at 2.4 GHz. Other frequencies and frequency channels may be used. The channels may be assigned, for example, so that the first group or plurality of beamforming transceivers 302a-d transmit in channel 1, the second group or plurality of transceivers 302e-h transmit in channel 6, and cluster transceiver 303 transmits in channel 11. Other configurations may be used.
If UE 306a is located in a SLC area, for example, MBAP controller 308 or processor may monitor whether or not two or more beamforming transceivers (e.g., transceivers 302a and 302b) of the plurality or group 302a-d transmitting on the same frequency have detected UE's presence or activity. UE's presence or activity may be determined or detected by, for example, receiving a registration request. Based on the monitoring, MBAP controller 308 may allow cluster transceiver 303 to transmit data to the UE 306a by, for example, sending control signals to transceivers 302a and 302b instructing them to reject registration of UE 306a. MBAP controller may monitor other activity between transceivers 302a-h and UE to determine whether to allow UE to switch to data transmission with cluster transceiver 303. Other kinds of activity or data may be monitored to determine whether at least two beamforming transceivers have detected UE 306a. In another embodiment, for example, MBAP controller 308 may track or store UE's 306 activity over time. MBAP controller 308 may track a number of times in a predetermined time period that at least two of the beamforming transceivers have detected data transmission from UE 306a. For example, if MBAP controller 308 determines that at least two beamforming transceivers receive or sense a registration request (or other kinds of activity or data) from UE 306a at a threshold number of times in one time period (e.g., 1 second, 200 milliseconds), then MBAP controller 308 may compel UE 306a to register with a different antenna beam and channel by re-registering UE 306a.
If a UE 306b is not in SLC area, for example, MBAP controller 308 may determine that two or more beamforming transceivers have not detected UE 306b and MBAP controller 308 may not take steps to allow cluster transceiver 303 to transmit data with UE 306b. For example, only one beamforming transceiver, e.g., 304c may detect UE 306b, and MBAP controller 308 may allow data transmission between UE and the one beamforming transceiver 304c to continue or may accept UE's registration with the one beamforming transceiver 304c. If MBAP controller 308 determines that no beamforming transceivers 302a-h can detect a UE 306c, then UE 306c may be entirely out of the geographic range of the MBAP 300. While the above example was described in reference to the first plurality of beamforming transceivers 302a-d on a first channel, the above example would also apply to the second plurality of beamforming transceivers 302e-h transmitting on a second channel.
MBAP controller 308 may allow cluster transceiver 303 to transmit data to UE 306a by, for example, rejecting a registration request by UE 306a to beamforming transceiver 304a or 304b. Rejecting registration of UE to allow cluster transceiver to transmit data to UE may be implemented for example in the following manner. Transceivers 302a-h may use the same ESS (Extended Service Set), by using the same Service Set Identification (SSID), e.g., primary SSID “A”. Cluster transceiver 303 on channel 11 may use a second SSID, e.g., secondary SSID “B”. Thus, beamforming transceivers 304a-b may each maintain a primary SSID “A”, and cluster transceiver 303 may maintain or store a secondary SSID “B” in memory, e.g., memory 316. The UE 306a may distinguish each transceiver through a unique Basic Service Set Identification (BSSID) address. UEs 306 associated with MBAP 300 may be configured with both SSID “A” and SSID “B” as preferred networks. When UE is located in a SLC area, for example, MBAP controller 308 may reject UE's 306a registration request to any of beamforming transceivers 302a-h which have SSID “A”. When UE 306a is rejected, UE 306a may request registration with cluster transceiver 303, which has SSID “B”. MBAP 300 may be configured so that UE 306a obtains exactly the same service and uses the authentication credentials on both the primary and secondary SSID. MBAP 300 may be capable of fast roaming according to IEEE 802.11r so that UE's 306a transitions between primary and secondary SSIDs may occur faster and with less user disruption for UE's 306a that are also 802.11r capable.
Another UE 602b may start operation in an area of beam 608 and move into the SLC area 604. The MBAP controller may continue to monitor all data frames from all UE being serviced by the MBAP to determine if a UE is starting to be detected by more than one access point. If detections occur on a regular basis (a period of time which can be adjusted as a tuning parameter) then UE 602b may be forced to move from a beamforming transceiver channel to the cluster transceiver channel 11. UE 602b may be inside the coverage of the cluster transceiver before it enters the SLC area 604. However, practically, these boundaries may not be sharp or smooth so the margin between the SLC area and cluster beam coverage may be provided. The margin level may be field tuned.
Another UE 602c may move laterally from one beam 610 to another beam 611. As UE 602c moves, the signal on beam 610 may decrease and at some point the UE autonomously may decide to roam to another access point, e.g., the access point that supports beam 611. This may be standard UE roaming and the MBAP may be 801.11r (fast roaming) capable so that if the UE is also 802.11r capable, that protocol will be used. Again because of “stickiness” UE 602c may stay on beam 610 for a longer duration than it should. The MBAP will also be 802.11k capable and if UE3 is also 802.11k capable, that procedure may be used to guide UE 602c to a better access point.
In operation 710, the data for each UE may be analyzed to determine the statistics of “hits” and “misses” for each UE over a sample time period. In operation 720, the hit statistics may be compared to a threshold value. The length (both time of observation and number of detections) and the ratio of hits to misses may be field adjustable and may be set to cause an alarm when the a threshold of hits indicates that UE has moved into the SLC area. In operation 740, if the threshold has been reached, MBAP controller may switch UE to a cluster transceiver beam, or allow data transmission between cluster transceiver and UE. Non-limiting examples of decisions may be: i) 50 UE data frames may be observed and 20% or more produced “hits” so the UE may be considered in the SLC area and the UE may be moved to the Cluster beam. ii) 50 UE data frames have been observed and only 2% produced “hits” so the UE may not be moved. The specific values and the thresholds and averaging window may be field adjustable numbers.
Periodically, e.g., every minute or every 30 seconds, for example, the UE Assignment Algorithm as shown in 804-812 may be executed.
In operation 804, an algorithm may examine the collected data to determine longer term trends on a UE. A series of statistics may be developed to optimize the stability of the reassignment algorithms. The algorithm may develop medium term utilization statistics for each beam that considers channel loading, average SNIR for each UE, or other statistics.
In operation 806, the MBAP may consider whether to change the coverage of the cluster transceiver by increasing or decreasing the transceiver power and the sensitivity of the receiver, so as to maintain uplink/downlink ratios used on other beams. (However, the cluster transceiver coverage may not be reduced below what is required to fully blanket the SLC area). If a cluster antenna pattern change is desired, cluster transceiver power and sensitivity may be changed in operation 808 and parameters for the change may calculated and sent to the cluster transceiver. Additionally the MBAP configuration file may be updated with this new configuration data and operation 804 may be executed with the changed configuration data.
If a cluster antenna pattern change is not required, then in operation 810, the MBAP may consider whether the UE's channel assignment needs to be changed based on data from operation 804. In operation 812, the UE channel assignment may be changed if the data supports this decision. If the data does not mandate a change in the UE channel assignment, analysis of UE data may continue in operation 804.
In operation 902, MBAP controller may determine if the UE is IEEE 802.11k and CCX (Cisco Compatible Extensions) capable. These protocols may be designed to aid in UE assignments to the appropriate transceivers so as to improve resource management. If UE is 802.11k and CCX compatible, the processor may allow the UE to register with the cluster transceiver and allow the cluster transceiver to transmit data to the UE in accordance with a standard protocol defined by IEEE 802.11k or CCX.
For legacy UE (those that are neither 802.11k or CCX compatible) a deregistration message may be sent to the UE in operation 906. This message may cause the UE to scan for a new connection in operation 908. In operation 909, the controller may determine whether UE is on the cluster transceiver beam. If the UE was being served by one of the multibeams, it would have been connected to primary SSID “A”. Having been deregistered from primary SSID “A” the UE may look for another SSID in its preferred network list. Secondary SSID “B” may be in the UEs preferred network list and is being used as the second SSID by the cluster antenna. The transition from SSID “A” to SSID “B” and vice versa may occur with less service disruption if the UE is 802.11r capable. If UE fails to register on the cluster transceiver channel, MBAP may continue to attempt registration of UE on the cluster transceiver in operation 910.
The above approach may enable all UE to be moved out of SLC conditions on to the Cluster antenna as well as being move on to the Cluster antenna as part of channel load balancing.
In the event a legacy UE has been moved into an expanded Cluster Beam area and the MBAP controller would like that UE back on the multibeam, the UE can be “coaxed” to move by the MBAP lowering the power on the Cluster Beam.
It is also possible, by repeating rejection, to move the legacy UE to a different multibeam. This can be accomplished by continuing to reject registration request from the UE until it request registration on the AP channel desired by the MBAP controller. This repeated registration rejection method will not in general be used and only the UE that are either 802.11k or CCX capable will be directly assigned to beams by the MBAP controller
Different embodiments are disclosed herein. Features of certain embodiments may be combined with features of other embodiments; thus certain embodiments may be combinations of features of multiple embodiments.
Embodiments of the invention may include an article such as a computer or processor readable non-transitory storage medium, such as for example a memory, a disk drive, or a USB flash memory device encoding, including or storing instructions, e.g., computer-executable instructions, which when executed by a processor or controller, cause the processor or controller to carry out methods disclosed herein.
In various embodiments, computational modules may be implemented by e.g., processors (e.g., a general purpose computer processor or central processing unit executing software), or digital signal processors (DSPs), or other circuitry. The baseband modem may be implanted, for example, as a DSP. A beamforming matrix can be calculated and implemented for example by software running on general purpose processor. Beamformers, gain controllers, switches, combiners, and phase shifters may be implemented, for example using RF circuitries.
An additional benefit of the invention is the possibility of increasing the utilization of limited radio channels by organizing UE on different radio channels by the quality of their connection to the AP thus increasing the utilization of the radio environment. Specifically the quality of the signal from the UE is measured by the AP and those UEs with stronger signals are assigned to a radio channel with an antenna that has a lower gain and broad azimuth coverage, while the weaker signals are assigned to a higher gain more directional antenna.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as exemplifications of some of the preferred embodiments. Other possible variations, modifications, and applications are also within the scope of the invention. Different embodiments are disclosed herein. Features of certain embodiments may be combined with features of other embodiments; thus certain embodiments may be combinations of features of multiple embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4044359 | Applebaum et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4359738 | Lewis | Nov 1982 | A |
4540985 | Clancy et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4628320 | Downie | Dec 1986 | A |
5162805 | Cantrell | Nov 1992 | A |
5363104 | Richmond | Nov 1994 | A |
5444762 | Frey et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5732075 | Tangemann et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5915215 | Williams et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5940033 | Locher et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6018317 | Dogan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6046655 | Cipolla | Apr 2000 | A |
6101399 | Raleigh et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6215812 | Young et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226507 | Ramesh et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230123 | Mekuria et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6297772 | Lewis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321077 | Saitoh et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6377783 | Lo et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6584115 | Suzuki | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6697633 | Dogan et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6834073 | Miller et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6927646 | Niemi | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6975582 | Karabinis et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6987958 | Lo et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7068628 | Li et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7177663 | Axness et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7257425 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7299072 | Ninomiya | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7392015 | Farlow et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7499109 | Kim et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7606528 | Mesecher | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7719993 | Li et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7742000 | Mohamadi | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7769107 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7898478 | Niu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8078109 | Mulcay | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8115679 | Falk | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8155613 | Kent et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8280443 | Tao et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8294625 | Kittinger et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306012 | Lindoff et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315671 | Kuwahara et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8369436 | Stirling-Gallacher | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8509190 | Rofougaran | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520657 | Rofougaran | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526886 | Wu et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8599979 | Farag et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20010029326 | Diab et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010038665 | Baltersee et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020051430 | Kasami et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065107 | Harel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020085643 | Kitchener et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107013 | Fitzgerald | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030114162 | Chheda et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030153322 | Burke et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030203717 | Chuprun et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040056795 | Ericson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040121810 | Goransson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125899 | Li et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040125900 | Liu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040166902 | Castellano et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040228388 | Salmenkaita | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235527 | Reudink et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050068230 | Munoz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068918 | Mantravadi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075140 | Famolari | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050129155 | Hoshino | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147023 | Stephens et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050245224 | Kurioka | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050287962 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060094372 | Ahn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060135097 | Wang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060227854 | McCloud et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264184 | Li et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270343 | Cha et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285507 | Kinder et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070093261 | Hou et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070152903 | Lin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070223380 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080043867 | Blanz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051037 | Molnar et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080144737 | Naguib | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080238808 | Arita et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280571 | Rofougaran et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285637 | Liu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090028225 | Runyon et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090046638 | Rappaport et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090058724 | Xia et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090121935 | Xia et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154419 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090190541 | Abedi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090268616 | Hosomi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090322610 | Hants et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322613 | Bala et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100037111 | Ziaja et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100040369 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100117890 | Vook et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100135420 | Xu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150013 | Hara et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172429 | Nagahama et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195560 | Nozaki et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234071 | Shabtay et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100278063 | Kim et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100283692 | Achour et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100285752 | Lakshmanan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303170 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100316043 | Doi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110019639 | Karaoguz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110032849 | Yeung et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032972 | Wang et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110105036 | Rao et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110150050 | Trigui et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150066 | Fujimoto | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110163913 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110205883 | Mihota | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110249576 | Chrisikos et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110273977 | Shapira et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281541 | Borremans | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299437 | Mikhemar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014377 | Joergensen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015603 | Proctor et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120020396 | Hohne et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120033761 | Guo et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120034952 | Lo et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045003 | Li et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120064838 | Miao et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120076028 | Ko et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120170672 | Sondur | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120201153 | Bharadia et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201173 | Jain et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120207256 | Farag et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120212372 | Petersson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218962 | Kishiyama et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220331 | Luo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120230380 | Keusgen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120251031 | Suarez et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120270544 | Shah | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120314570 | Forenza et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130023225 | Weber | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130051283 | Lee et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130070741 | Li et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079048 | Cai et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130094621 | Luo et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130101073 | Zai et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130156120 | Josiam et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130170388 | Ito et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130208619 | Kudo et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223400 | Seo et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130242976 | Katayama et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130272437 | Eidson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130331136 | Yang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 867 177 | May 2010 | EP |
2 234 355 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2009-278444 | Nov 2009 | JP |
WO 03047033 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03073645 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2010085854 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2011060058 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,146 dated Jan. 22, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,146 dated Mar. 27, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,159 dated Apr. 16, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,191 dated May 2, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,188 dated May 15, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,204 dated May 21, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,255 dated Jun. 6, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,068 dated Jun. 11, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,159 dated Jun. 20, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,886 dated Jul. 17, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,191 dated Jul. 19, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,146 dated Jul. 31, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,188 dated Aug. 19, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,255 dated Sep. 17, 2013. |
Ahmadi-Shokouh et al., “Pre-LNA Smart Soft Antenna Selection for MIMO Spatial Multiplexing/Diversity System when Amplifier/Sky Noise Dominates”, European Transactions on Telecommunications, Wiley & Sons, Chichester, GB, vol. 21, No. 7, Nov. 1, 2010, pp. 663-677. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,150 dated Sep. 25, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,204 dated Oct. 23, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,454 dated Oct. 28, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,194 dated Oct. 30, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,190 dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,068 dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/010,771 dated Dec. 17, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,182 dated Dec. 17, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,863 dated Dec. 17, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/011,521 dated Dec. 23, 2013. |
Huang et al., “Antenna Mismatch and Calibration Problem in Coordinated Multi-point Transmission System,” IET Communications, 2012, vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 289-299. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/109,904 dated Feb. 27, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,454 dated Mar. 7, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,500 dated Mar. 26, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,182 dated Mar. 25, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,863 dated Mar. 25, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/010,771 dated Apr. 4, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,352 dated Apr. 7, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,150 dated Apr. 9, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,194 dated Apr. 9, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,765 dated Apr. 22, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,376 dated May 9, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,580 dated May 9, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,068 dated May 13, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61764209 | Feb 2013 | US | |
61805770 | Mar 2013 | US | |
61809054 | Apr 2013 | US |