The present invention relates to the field of manufacturing dentures. More particularly, the present invention relates to manufacturing of dentures having multiple material layers.
Dentures have been manufactured for centuries to replace all or part of an individual's dentition. Dentures have been manufactured by molding the denture from casts made of the patient's edentulous or partially edentulous ridges. The manufacturing process may begin with a preliminary impression of the patient's mouth, which is usually done in silicone or alginate. This impression may be used to prepare a diagnostic cast. While making the impression, the dentist applies pressure to the soft tissues to simulate biting force and extends the borders of the mold to adjacent toothless areas to allow the dentures to better adapt to the gums. A final cast may then be formed from gypsum based on the diagnostic cast. The final cast may be filled or “waxed up” to form the denture. The denture teeth will be set in the wax. The cast with the waxed denture will be placed in a mold and injected or packed with acrylic. Once the resin has cured, the cast may be broken apart and the denture may be removed.
More recently, dentures have been manufactured by machining a void in a block of denture base material formed to match the contour of natural teeth as arranged on a maxilla or on a mandible; filling the void with a synthetic tooth material; removing a portion of the synthetic tooth material; and potentially filling the void and removing a portion of material a second time in order to create denture having teeth made of one or potentially two or more layers.
While machining has been used to form the basic shapes of dentures and denture teeth, prior innovations fail to adequately address the aesthetics and function of the denture, particularly the aesthetics at and below the gum line. For example, in a traditional denture the denture teeth mimic the appearance of a natural tooth only above the gum line because traditional denture teeth adhere to a denture baseplate rather than extending into the baseplate with roots, as would real teeth. Traditional denture teeth are made in standard shapes using injection molding or pressure molding techniques. Anatomical roots are not incorporated in these teeth because of manufacturing difficulties. Currently, a dental technician may festoon root structures in the denture base and use different coloring techniques to paint the dental base to simulate the roots. This requires additional cost, delay, and expense and does not aesthetically mimic a natural tooth as completely as an anatomical root would. Thus, there is a need for a denture having a more natural structure that will exhibit an improved aesthetic appearance.
Prior innovations also fail to adequately address the function of traditional dentures with traditional denture teeth. Dentures need to be balanced to avoid the patient's denture becoming loose or unstable during the protrusive and lateral movement of the mandible. This often requires grinding the occlusal surface of the denture teeth until the dentures remain in contact on at least three points throughout much of the movement of the mandible. Traditionally, a denture technician will set up the denture in an articulator and grind the teeth until the occlusive design of the denture is balanced. However, grinding the teeth will take away the enamel layer of the teeth, diminishing the aesthetic appearance of the teeth and functionally weakening the teeth. Thus, there is also need for a denture which is balanced, yet with unground occlusal surface (enamel) so that the denture has a more natural structure that will exhibit an improved aesthetic appearance and will not suffer from weakening of the enamel due to grinding.
Furthermore, in many dentures, a metal bar often sits beneath the denture base to enhance stability and strength. Often if the denture is implant supported, the denture is installed without the bar structure until such time as the patient has healed from the surgery enough so that the inflammation or swelling of the patient's soft tissue has receded to allow the bar structure to fit beneath the denture base. Then a modified denture must be reinstalled, with the bar structure. Furthermore, denture acrylics are often not strong enough to sustain bite forces, thus the base is often mounted on a bar to distribute the forces. This bar can be undesirable due to the associated bulk, cost, weight, and production delay and expense. Thus, there is yet another need for a denture having a reinforcement structure but without the bulk, cost, weight, production delay and expense associated with the bar structure.
Accordingly, there remains a need for a denture that more closely simulates natural mouth structures, providing both structural and aesthetical improvements and which, in the case of implant-supported dentures, does not require a follow up procedure to insert a separate bar beneath the denture.
In accordance with various aspects of the present invention, an improved layered denture is provided. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, a method for manufacturing a layered denture may comprise the steps of A) configuring a base from a first material to form a first pocket; B) filling a first tooth dentition material into said first pocket; machining said first tooth dentition material to form a dentin layer; C) filling a second tooth dentition material into said first pocket; D) configuring said second tooth dentition material to form an enamel layer; and E) defining a motion envelope of a mandible of a patient that is in accordance with a three-dimensional file of the patient so that the dentin layer is offset according to the motion envelope to provide sufficient spacing to achieve balanced occlusion, the step of defining the motion envelope may further comprise electronically modeling the dentin layer and enamel layers according to the motion envelope, whereby a shape of an outer surface of the enamel layer may correspond to the defined motion envelope, the step of defining the motion envelope is further defined in protrusion comprising at least one of the constraints of centric relation and edge-to-edge central incisors, and incisal guidance and condylar shape; the step of defining the motion envelop may be further defined in laterotrusion comprising at least one of the constraints of vertical alignment of buccal cusps of posterior teeth, and canine guidance and condylar shape; the method may further comprise configuring a second pocket in the base; and filling a reinforcement material in the second pocket to form a support layer; the step of filling a remaining cavity within the second pocket with a second material that comprises a covering layer; the step of configuring the first pocket results in the first pocket resembling a root of a tooth; further comprising the step of filling a simulated root material into said first pocket, wherein the shape of at least one of the first pocket and the simulated root material is configured to provide sufficient spacing to achieve balanced occlusion, wherein a shape of an outer surface of the enamel layer corresponds to the motion envelope; wherein a gum line on an exterior of the layered denture established, the simulated root material extending below the gum line; the step of filling a simulated root material into the first pocket, wherein said simulated root material is machined to provide at least one of a dentin layer or an enamel layer, or a root approximating structure; wherein the step of machining said first tooth dentition material to form a dentin layer or the step of filling a simulated root material into the first tooth pocket wherein said simulated root material is machined may be machined in accordance with three-dimensional digital images of the patient; wherein three-dimensional digital images of the patient may be at least one of digital scanning of the patient, a patient's dentures, and bite impressions of the patient; wherein the first dentition material may be different than the second dentition material.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, a method for manufacturing a layered denture may comprise A) configuring a base from a first material to form a first pocket; B) filling a first tooth dentition material into said first pocket; machining said first tooth dentition material to form a simulated root structure layer and at least part of a dentin layer; C) filling a second tooth dentition material into said first pocket; D) configuring said second tooth dentition material to form an enamel layer; and defining a motion envelope of a mandible of a patient that is in accordance with a three-dimensional file of the patient so that the simulated root structure and at least part of a dentin layer is offset according to the motion envelope to provide sufficient spacing to achieve balanced occlusion; wherein the shape of at least one of the first pocket and the simulated root material may be configured to provide sufficient spacing to achieve balanced occlusion, wherein a shape of an outer surface of the enamel layer corresponds to the motion envelope; the step of defining the motion envelope is further defined in protrusion comprising at least one of the constraints of centric relation and edge-to-edge central incisors, and incisal guidance and condylar shape; the step of defining the motion envelop may be further defined in laterotrusion comprising at least one of the constraints of vertical alignment of buccal cusps of posterior teeth, and canine guidance and condylar shape; wherein a gum line on an exterior of the layered denture established, the simulated root material extending below the gum line; the step of filling a simulated root material into the first pocket, wherein said simulated root material is machined to provide at least one of a dentin layer or an enamel layer, or a root approximating structure; wherein the simulated root material may be a different material than that of the second dentition layer.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, a layered denture may be manufactured by iteratively adding layers to cavities or pockets in the denture base and then removing portions of the layers to create portions of the teeth, roots of teeth, reinforcement structures, or other features of the denture. Different layers can be formed from different materials having different strengths, colors, translucency and other material properties. Furthermore, a layered denture may be manufactured according to electronic models, such as three-dimensional digital images, wherein the design of the dentition is adjusted to achieve balanced occlusion.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, the material removing operations can be performed in accordance with three-dimensional digital images to create realistic dentures. The three-dimensional digital images can be created from the patient using combinations of digital scanning and bite impressions.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, a layered denture may be configured to approximate roots of teeth. The base may have pockets configured to simulate roots when filled with a material. For example, a material may be filled in a pocket resulting in a root approximating structure so that the denture has a more realistic appearance.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in connection with the Figures, where like reference numbers refer to similar elements throughout the Figures, and:
The following description is of various exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the present disclosure in any way. Rather, the following description is intended to provide a convenient illustration for implementing various embodiments including the best mode. As will become apparent, various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of the elements described in these embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
For the sake of brevity, conventional techniques for manufacturing and construction may not be described in detail herein. Furthermore, the connecting lines shown in various figures contained herein are intended to represent exemplary functional relationships and/or physical couplings between various elements. It should be noted that many alternative or additional functional relationships or physical connections may be present in a practical method of construction.
Now, with reference to
In one example embodiment, said base 210 comprises a hardened polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) material. However, said base may comprise any material having sufficiently low porosity so as to be hygienic for extended placement in a wearer's mouth. For example, said base may be made of a plastic, ceramic, metal, or acrylic, including for instance, a polymer, monomer, composite, or alloy.
Furthermore, said base and any other components of a layered denture 200 may be formed according to a process and system for molding or forming products from thermosetting plastics. Such a system may utilize a deformable container that is placed within the cavity of a housing of a mold with resins and initiator mixed therein. As a piston slides into the cavity, the upper edges of the container may engage between the housing and the piston to seal the housing from leakage. The pressure of the piston along with heat on the housing may enable the curing process to be controlled to maximize compression and minimize porosity. Exemplary processes and systems disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/369,238, entitled “Processes and Systems for Molding Thermosetting Plastics” are incorporated by reference.
Furthermore, said base 210 comprising a first material may have a first pocket and a second pocket. Said first pocket and said second pocket may be machined by a CAD/CAM machining device, although any process suited for accurate forming of the material may be utilized. For example, said first pocket and said second pocket may be formed by machining, etching, waterjet, laser cutting, 3D printing, or chemical mask processes.
In one example embodiment, a layered denture 200 may have an artificial dentition structure 220. In one example embodiment, this structure may be at least one tooth. Said tooth may be constructed according to the principles described herein wherein a first tooth dentition material is filled into the first pocket of base 210 and machined to form a dentin layer 260 and a second tooth dentition material is filled into said first pocket of base 210 and machined to provide an enamel layer 250. The dentin layer 260 may comprise acrylic though any suitable material may be used. The enamel layer 250 may comprise high impact acrylic though any material adapted to be wear and abrasion resistant may be used. In some example embodiments, the dentin layer 260 and/or the enamel layer 250 comprise materials processed by exemplary processes and systems disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/369,238, entitled “Processes and Systems for Molding Thermosetting Plastics,” which are incorporated by reference. In some example embodiments these exemplary processes and system enhance the durability of the acrylic or other materials comprising the dentin layer 260 and/or enamel layer 250. In some example embodiments, said artificial dentition structure 220 is electronically defined to achieve balanced occlusion, in accordance with the principles disclosed herein. For example, at least one layer of said artificial dentition structure may be offset to accommodate an enamel layer.
Now, with reference to
As discussed in the background, a metal reinforcement bar may be used to provide reinforcement support to a denture; however, in accordance with the principles disclosed herein, a layered denture 200 may instead comprise a support layer 230 to provide reinforcement support to a layered denture. Said support layer 230 may comprise carbon fiber, though it may alternatively comprise numerous other materials configured to provide support, such as, for example, a Kevlar-brand material, Dynema-brand material, Aramid-brand material, alloy, glass, binder, epoxy, polyester, acrylic, or any material or combination of materials having a desired strength, stiffness, or flexibility sufficient to reinforce said denture. In still other embodiments, layered denture 200 may comprise a plurality of support layers.
In some embodiments, support layer 230 may lie generally parallel to the mandibular or maxillary plane. In other embodiments, support layer 230 may lie generally normal to the mandibular or maxillary ridge, or at any angle with respect to the mandibular ridge or the maxillary ridge. Furthermore, support layer 230 may be non-continuous along the denture. Some embodiments may combine features of various exemplary embodiments.
In some embodiments, a support layer 230 may comprise multiple materials, or any material configuration suitable to enhance or reinforce the resiliency and/or support of the layered denture when subjected to wear in a wearer's mouth or to satisfy other desired chemical, physical, or biological properties. Furthermore, a support layer may comprise materials with differing grain structures or grain direction or with similar grain structures or grain direction or any grain structure or direction suitable for achieving desired properties in the layered denture 200; for example, resiliency undue torsional loads. In some embodiments, a support layer 230 may be comprised of carbon, a Kevlar-brand material, Dynema-brand material, Aramid-brand material, alloy, glass, binder, epoxy, polyester, acrylic, or any material or combination of materials suitable for achieving desired properties in the layered denture 200.
A support layer 230 may also be made of materials with differing or similar visual and aesthetic features, such as color, translucency, or gloss, or any visual or aesthetic feature to simulate natural dentition of the patient.
In some example embodiments, the materials comprising a support layer may be self-cured, heat-cured, radiation-cured, or illumination-cured, or otherwise rendered solid by any other method. In some example embodiments, the materials comprising a support layer may be cured in accordance with exemplary processes and systems disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/369,238, entitled “Processes and Systems for Molding Thermosetting Plastics” are incorporated by reference.
Now, with reference to
In one example embodiment, said machining is in accordance with a three-dimensional file of the patient's anatomy. For example, in one example embodiment, a layered denture 200 may be manufactured with consideration for balanced occlusion of the layered denture when used by a denture user. In one embodiment, artificial dentition structure 220 is electronically defined by computer modeling wherein each layer is designed by defining the motion envelope of the user's mandible and each layer is shaped to accommodate that motion while remaining in contact through much or all of the motion. In one example embodiment, each layer may be defined by prismatic or other geometry. Furthermore, with reference to
With reference to
An exemplary manufacturing process may proceed by iterative steps of machining pockets, then filling the machined pockets with a material, then machining the filled material to create a layer. In other exemplary manufacturing processes, multiple steps of machining and filling may occur in parallel, for example, at different locations or surfaces of the layered denture. In some example embodiments, at least one of dentin portion 260 and enamel layer 250 may be formed by machining or by 3D printing. In some example embodiments, additional material, for example, bonding material, is filled over a layer and machined, although any manufacturing process causing adhesion or bonding between layers may be utilized. In some embodiments, a layered denture may comprise multiple layers, although any number of layers suitable to form the denture as desired may be implemented.
The process for manufacturing layered dentures may be implemented by an apparatus as describing below. Moreover, it is to be expressly understood that any other systems or apparatus may also implement the process of the present invention.
In one instance, a fixture for holding the layered denture during manufacturing may be located adjacent to a material removing device. In some instances, the material removing device is a CNC or a CAD/CAM mill, although the material removing device can be a mill, grinder, laser cutter, or any other suitable device for forming the structures of the layered denture. In some instances, the material removing device and the fixture are movable relative to one another. In some instances, adjacent to the fixture may be at least one material delivery device to deliver raw material for the filling process described herein. Now, having discussed manufacturing of the reinforcement aspects, a layered denture may be further improved by adding a simulated root structure.
With reference to
In some example embodiments, said simulated root material 710 provides a surface upon which artificial dentition structure 220 may be mounted. In other example embodiments, said simulated root material is machined to form part of a dentin portion 260 of an artificial dentition structure 220. For example, in some example embodiments (
With reference to
With reference to
Furthermore, with reference to
In addition, it should be noted that exemplary embodiments of a layered denture may include one of a simulated root structure, a support layer and a consideration for balanced occlusion, or any combination of such features. For example, a layered denture may include a support layer with balance occlusion (and without simulated root structure), a support layer with a simulated root structure (without balanced occlusion), a simulated root structure with balanced occlusion (without a support layer, and/or with a convention metal band configuration) or any other arrangement of such features individually or in combination. For purposes of describing the present invention, machining is used to describe the process of removing material from a part. This term, for purposes of the present invention includes but is not limited to milling, 3D printing, grinding, water jetting, laser cutting, electric discharge machining, CNC machining, ultrasonic machining, and any other type of mechanical, chemical, electrical, or other process suitable to conform filled material into to a layer.
The present disclosure has been described with reference to various embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the specification is to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. Likewise, benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to various embodiments. However, benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Also, as used herein, the terms “proximate,” “proximately,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a physical connection, an electrical connection, a magnetic connection, an optical connection, a communicative connection, a functional connection, and/or any other connection. When language similar to “at least one of A, B, or C” is used, the phrase is intended to mean any of the following: (1) at least one of A; (2) at least one of B; (3) at least one of C; (4) at least one of A and at least one of B; (5) at least one of B and at least one of C; (6) at least one of A and at least one of C; or (7) at least one of A, at least one of B, and at least one of C.
This application is a Continuation to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/830,963 filed on Mar. 14, 2013 and entitled “System and Process for Manufacturing of Dentures.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
830887 | Robert | Sep 1906 | A |
2398671 | Saffir | Apr 1946 | A |
2514076 | Kelly | Jul 1950 | A |
2602997 | Clawson | Jul 1952 | A |
3126429 | Saffir | Mar 1964 | A |
3335495 | Theodore | Aug 1967 | A |
3458936 | Tuccillo et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3470614 | Kelly | Oct 1969 | A |
3518761 | Susman et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3644996 | Weinkle | Feb 1972 | A |
3667123 | Huey | Jun 1972 | A |
3702027 | Marshall et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3727309 | Huey | Apr 1973 | A |
3813777 | VanHandel et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3839796 | Dimmer et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3846911 | Wichner | Nov 1974 | A |
3908272 | Arnold | Sep 1975 | A |
3937773 | Huffman | Feb 1976 | A |
3987546 | Trampe | Oct 1976 | A |
4029632 | Gross et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4115488 | Colpitts | Sep 1978 | A |
4247287 | Gigante | Feb 1981 | A |
4398884 | Huffman | Aug 1983 | A |
4533325 | Blair | Aug 1985 | A |
4575340 | Lustig | Mar 1986 | A |
5030102 | Lang | Jul 1991 | A |
5169309 | Staubli et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5234339 | Grigereit | Aug 1993 | A |
5452219 | Dehoff et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5676546 | Heitmann et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5718584 | Wong | Feb 1998 | A |
5730825 | Atake | Mar 1998 | A |
5775899 | Huffman | Jul 1998 | A |
5885078 | Cagna et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5934906 | Phimmasone | Aug 1999 | A |
5985170 | Inaba et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6030218 | Robinson | Feb 2000 | A |
6116070 | Oshida | Sep 2000 | A |
6126445 | Willoughby | Oct 2000 | A |
6139322 | Liu | Oct 2000 | A |
6227851 | Chishti | May 2001 | B1 |
6257895 | Oestreich | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6384107 | Liu | May 2002 | B2 |
6788986 | Traber et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6814575 | Poirier | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7153136 | Thomas | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7530810 | Clement | May 2009 | B2 |
7653455 | Cinader, Jr. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7704076 | Mullaly | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7758346 | Letcher | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7806691 | Berger | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7854611 | Yau et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7901209 | Saliger et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7943068 | Panzera | May 2011 | B2 |
7950924 | Brajnovic | May 2011 | B2 |
8567408 | Roettger | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8641938 | Howe | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8875398 | Balshi et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9155599 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9192456 | Howe | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9213784 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9364302 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9402698 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9468509 | Howe | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9492252 | Howe | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9610145 | Howe | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9662189 | McDermott | May 2017 | B2 |
9717572 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744010 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9867684 | Grobbee et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10206764 | Grobbee et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10251733 | Grobbee | Apr 2019 | B2 |
20030138756 | Monkmeyer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030162147 | Dequeker | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040185422 | Orth et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20140080094 | Howe | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140099600 | Harrison | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140234802 | Howe | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140272777 | Howe | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140272798 | McDermott et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140272800 | Howe | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010885 | Balshi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150111177 | Fisker et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150182316 | Morales et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150327961 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160008108 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160089221 | Christen et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170014212 | Fischer | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170112599 | Balshi | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170325920 | Ginsburg et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1750797 | Mar 2006 | CN |
1062916 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1252867 | Jul 2016 | EP |
3348228 | Jul 2018 | EP |
2035133 | Dec 1970 | FR |
WO1991007141 | May 1991 | WO |
WO2003024352 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO2004060197 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2009105661 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO2009105700 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2012030493 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO2014130536 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO2014159436 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO2015031062 | Mar 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP Application 11838843.8—EPO Search Report dated Mar. 4, 2014. |
EP Application 14764979.4—EPO Search Report dated Sep. 7, 2016. |
EP Application 14774571.5—EPO Search Report dated Aug. 12, 2016. |
EP Application 15156818.6—EPO Search Report dated Jun. 18, 2015. |
EP Application 16184888.8—EPO Search Report dated Jan. 12, 2017. |
PCT Application PCT/US2014/051008—International Search Report ad Written Opinion dated Nov. 20, 2014. |
PCT Application PCT/US2014/051008—Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 1, 2016. |
Positioning handle and occlusal locks for the Teeth-in-a-Day protocol:, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2016, Balshi et al., p. 274-278. |
“A New Protocol for Immediate Functional Loading of Dental Implants”, Dentistry Today, Balshi et al., Sep. 2001, vol. 20, No. 9. |
“CAD and CAM—possibilities of optimization in total prosthetics (I)”, Quintessenz, Becker, Apr. 1991, Issue 4, p. 397 to 404. |
“Geroprosthetics; Age-appropriate prosthesis design with heart and mind,”ZTM Aktuell, Maas, Jul. 2010. |
N. Savic, PalaDigtal.com, “My Digital Denture,” Supplement to Inside Dental Technology magazine, Aegis Communications, Mar. 2017. |
AvaDent product information printed on May 15, 2017 from Avadent website; posting date unknown. |
Morales et al., “A Digital Spin on Traditional Dentures,” Chairside Magazine, vol. 11, Issue 4, Glidewell Laboratories, Mar. 27, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,138—Advisory Action dated Nov. 23, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,138—Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,141—Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 9, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,141—Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,141—Final Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,621—Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,621—Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 22, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348—Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348—Final Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348—Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348—Final Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348—Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348—Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348—Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 30, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348—Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 18, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/506,338—Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/506,338—Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 17, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/798,717—Restriction Request dated Aug. 17, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/798,717—Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,097—Restriction Request dated Jan. 4, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/798,717—Restriction Requirement dated Aug. 17, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,097—Restriction Requirement dated Jan. 4, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,097—Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,097—Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 20, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/152,521—Restriction Requirement dated Aug. 21, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/284,481—Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 28, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/284,481—Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180116771 A1 | May 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13830963 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15854256 | US |