The invention relates generally to the field of telecommunications. More specifically, but not by way of limitation, the invention relates to a system and method for remotely managing one or more communications networks.
Systems and methods are generally known for managing networks with the application of administrative consoles. One problem is how to enable network management by external service providers. A known solutions for management by an external service provider is to grant general administrative privileges to the service provider on a Local Area Network (LAN) or other network to be managed. Another known solution is to configure a firewall to permit access to the network from remote management consoles.
These known systems and methods for management by external service providers have several disadvantages. For example, direct connection to a LAN may not be feasible for a remote service provider. In addition, systems and method for modifying the configuration of a firewall may be costly to implement. Furthermore, approaches that result in broad administrative privileges to external service providers may present a security risk to stakeholders of data in the managed network.
What is needed is a system and method that facilitates remote management of one or more networks, while mitigating the risk associated with providing access through network firewalls.
The invention provides a system and method for that facilitating the remote management of one or more networks. In enabling the remote management of a network, embodiments of the invention provide limited access to service providers through a firewall, without the need to modify the configuration of the firewall. Advantageously, the cost of providing such access may be reduced compared to conventional approaches. In addition, such access may be limited to data inquiries or other commands, which can reduce the risk that the security of the network is compromised.
Embodiments of the invention provide a functional architecture having a control unit inside the firewall, and a proxy server outside the firewall. In one respect, embodiments of the invention provide a method to configure the control unit. In another respect, embodiments of the invention provide a method to configure the server. In yet another: respect, embodiments of the invention provide a system and method for communicating between the control unit and the proxy server.
The features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following drawings and detailed description.
Embodiments of the invention are described with reference to the following drawings, wherein:
Sub-headings are used below for organizational convenience. The disclosure of any particular feature is not necessarily limited to any particular section, however. The detailed description begins with an overview of a system architecture.
System Architecture
As used herein, Internet 125 represents a public network. Internet 125 can be replaced with a Wide Area Network (WAN), Local Area Network (LAN), or other publicly-accessible wired or wireless network, according to design choice.
As used herein, LAN 145 and LAN 160 represent enterprise networks that are inside (i.e., on the protected side) of firewalls 140 and 155, respectively. LANs 145 and 160 could be or include WANs or other network configurations, according to application requirements.
Consoles 120 and 130 each may be or include a personal computer, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), or other terminal or device suitable for handling necessary user interface functions. Moreover, consoles 120 and 130 each may include client software to facilitate operation in a networked environment.
The control units 150 and 165 may each include a central processing unit (CPU) (not shown), such as an Intel x86, Intel x86 compatible device, Intel Pentiumâ„¢, or other processor. The control units 150 and 165 may each further include a hard disk or other storage device (not shown) for storing programs and/or data. In addition, control units 150 and 165 may each have Random Access Memory (RAM), or other temporary memory (not shown) to execute Linux or other resident OS, and to execute application programs. Control units 150 and 165 may include application code (not shown) for managing LANs 145 and 160, respectively or for managing other networks (not shown) and/or devices (not shown). In addition, the control units 150 and 165 may each be or include a network server. In the illustrated embodiment, Control Units 150 and 165 are inside (i.e., on the protected side) of firewalls 140 and 155, respectively.
Proxy server 105 is a network-based server, and may include an Operating System (OS) (not shown), application code (not shown), and/or a database (not shown). In one respect, proxy server 105 provides access between each of consoles 120 and 130 and each of the control units 150 and 165. Control unit 150 may contain management data related to LAN 145 or other network (not shown) or network device (not shown), and control unit 165 may contain management data related to LAN 160 or other network (not shown) or network device (not shown). Proxy server 105 may aggregate and store performance data provided by control units 150 and 165, respectively. In operation, a user at either console 120 or 130 may provide commands to either or both of control units 150 and 165 via the proxy server 105.
In the illustrated embodiment, proxy server 105 is coupled to a public network. In an alternative embodiment, proxy server 105 may be protected inside a firewall (not shown). In yet another embodiment, proxy server 105 may be implemented within a De-Militarized Zone (DMZ) between a protected network (not shown) and the unprotected Internet 125 or other public network.
The quantity of any component illustrated in
Process Flows
In an alternative embodiment of the process illustrated in
Where a user, at console 120 or 130, for example, does not provide the server IP address, control unit 150 or 165 may obtain the server IP address using an inquiry command directed to the proxy server 105.
Next, the process advances to step 310 where the control unit 150 or 165 generates an access key. Finally, in step 315, the control unit 150 or 165 sends the access key and control unit identification information to the proxy server 105. Control unit identification information may include, for example, one or more of an external IP address and an internal IP address.
Accordingly, one or both of control units 150 and 165 are configured for remote communications with proxy server 105.
Communicating Through a Firewall
In other embodiments, multiple consoles may be coupled to the proxy server 510. For example, consoles 120 and 130 could be substituted for console 505. In addition, in other embodiments, the proxy server 510 may be coupled to multiple control units through corresponding multiple firewalls. For instance, control units 150 and 165 could be substituted for control unit 520, and firewalls 140 and 155 could be substituted for firewall 515. Moreover, a proxy server 510 may have the features described above with reference to proxy server 105.
The operation of the functional components illustrated in
Next, in step 610, the proxy server 510 establishes a connection with a console, and receives a request from the console. For instance, after establishing a server/client link with the console, which may be or include a Secure Socket Layer (SSL) link, proxy server 510 may receive console request message 550 from console 505.
Console request message 550 may be a request for network management data from control unit 520 related to LAN 145, LAN 160, other networks (not shown) coupled to control unit 150 and/or 165, or network devices (not shown) coupled to control units 150 and/or 165. For instance, console request message 550 may be a request for IP-PBX status information, where an IP-PBX is coupled to control unit 150 and/or 165. Console request message 550 may be a request for status information related to an Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) or other network device coupled to control unit 150 and/or 165. Further, console request message 550 may be a back-up, shut-down, re-start, or other control command directed to the control unit 150 and/or 165, or to an IP-PBX coupled to one of control unit 150 and/or 165, for example.
Then, in step 615, the proxy server 510 creates a request object having an identification (ID) number, where the request object is related to the console request. In addition, in step 615, the proxy server 510 adds the request object to a pool of one or more request objects. With reference to
The process is then promoted to step 620, where the proxy server 510 notifies the control unit of a pending request object, by ID number. For example, proxy server 510 could send request pending message 555 to control unit 520 with notice of pending request object 540 having ID number 0001.
Next, in step 625, the proxy driver creates a data connection with the control unit, and receives a request from the control unit for a request object having a specific ID number. The data connection may be, for example, a TCP/IP socket, opened according to commands issued via the control port connection. As an illustration of the data flow over the data connection, proxy driver 510 could receive a get request message 560 from the control unit 520. For instance, the get request message could specifically request the request object 540 having ID number 0001.
Then, in step 630, the proxy driver retrieves the specified request object from the pool of one or more request objects. For example, with reference to
The process then advances to step 635, where the proxy driver sends the specified request object to the control unit. Thus, in
In step 640, the proxy server 510 receives a response to the specific request object from the control unit and closes the data connection with the control unit. For instance, in this step, the request handler 535 receives management data from the control unit 520 as part of control unit response message 570.
In step 645, the proxy server 510 sends the response to the console. As an example, request handler 535 could send the management data to the console 505 as part of proxy server response message 575. In this case, proxy server response message 575 contains management data from control unit 520 that satisfies console request message 550 from the console 505.
Finally, the proxy server 510 closes the connection with the console in step 650, for example by ending the SSL link between the console 505 and the proxy server 510.
The description above illustrates how the process in
The invention described above thus overcomes the disadvantages of known systems and methods by facilitating the remote management of one or more networks without requiring modification to a firewall protecting the network to be managed, and without granting broad administrative privileges to external service providers. While this invention has been described in various explanatory embodiments, other embodiments and variations can be effected by a person of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6104716 | Crichton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6182086 | Lomet et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6292801 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6341311 | Smith et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349336 | Sit et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360273 | Beurket et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374298 | Tanno | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6510464 | Grantges et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6553422 | Nelson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6651174 | Nagaoka et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6751738 | Wesinger et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754831 | Brownell | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6968571 | Devine et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6996076 | Forbes et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7075922 | Mussman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7099301 | Sheu | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7107609 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7133511 | Buntin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7239629 | Olshansky et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7254832 | Christie, IV | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7257837 | Xu et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7363381 | Mussman et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20020038364 | Schweitzer | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020159440 | Mussman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030009464 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040001479 | Pounds et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040139209 | Mussman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161086 | Buntin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040260747 | Ying et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008006 | Schimper | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060031936 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050114665 A1 | May 2005 | US |