System and method for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and global thermostat using the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8894747
  • Patent Number
    8,894,747
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 5, 2013
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 25, 2014
    9 years ago
Abstract
A system for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere to reduce global warming including an air extraction system that collects carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through a medium and removes carbon dioxide from the medium; a sequestration system that isolates the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of storage and which can increase availability of renewable energy or non-fuel products such as fertilizers and construction materials; and one or more energy sources that supply process heat to the air extraction system to remove the carbon dioxide from the medium and which can regenerate it for continued use.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to systems and methods for removing greenhouse gases from an atmosphere, and in particular to systems and methods for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

There is much attention currently focused on trying to achieve three energy related and somewhat conflicting energy related objectives: 1) provide affordable energy for economic development; 2) achieve energy security; and 3) avoid the destructive climate change caused by global warming. Many different approaches are being considered to address climate change, including increasing the use of clean, non polluting renewable energy sources such as biofuels, solar, wind and nuclear, attempting to capture and sequester the carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel plants, as well as increased conservation efforts. Some of these approaches, such as solar power, have had their large scale implementation blocked due to their current high costs as compared to the cost of fossil based electricity, and other approaches, such as nuclear, are restrained by their environmental and security risks. In fact, the infrastructure and supply for renewable energy is so underdeveloped (e.g., only about 0.01% of our energy is provided by solar) that there is no feasible way to avoid using fossil fuels during the rest of this century if we are to have the energy needed for economic prosperity and avoid energy shortfalls that could lead to conflict.


The climate change threat caused by global warming and the more general recognition of our need to use renewable resources that do not harm our planet has grown steadily since the first Earth Day in 1972. It is mostly undisputed that an increase in the amount of so-called greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide (methane and water vapor are the other major greenhouse gases) will increase the temperature of the planet. These greenhouse gases help reduce the amount of heat that escapes from our planet into the atmosphere. The higher the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere the warmer the planet will be. There are complicated feedbacks that cause the amount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to change naturally even in the absence of human impact. Climate change throughout geological history has caused many extinctions. The concern about the threat of human induced climate change (i.e., global warming) resulted in the Kyoto Protocol that has been approved by over 165 countries and is an international agreement that commits the developed countries to reduce their carbon emissions.


One reason global warming is thought by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to be a threat is because of the sea level rise resulting from the melting of glaciers and the expansion of the ocean as our planet becomes hotter. Hundreds of millions of people who live just above sea level on islands or on the coasts are threatened by destructive flooding requiring relocation or the building of sea walls if the sea level rises even a meter. There is also a threat to other species from climate change which will destroy ecosystems that cannot adjust to the fast rate of human caused climate change. Additional threats include increased infectious diseases and more extreme weather as well as direct threats from extreme heat.


We can demonstrate the challenge of dealing with global warming using a simple model. Let CCA(YN) represent the carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere in year YN in gigatonnes per year. Similarly, let CEX(YN) equal the amount extracted, CEM(YN) the amount emitted by humans and CN(YN) be the amount either added or removed due to natural variations in the carbon cycle. Today, the land stores each year approximately 1.8 gigatonnes (109 tonnes) of carbon dioxide and the ocean approximately 10.5 gigatonnes (note carbon dioxide is 3.66 times heavier than carbon), while the amount humans add by emissions is about 24 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide. More generally, we have:

CCA(YN)=−CEX(YN)+CEM(YN)+CN(YN)  (1)
CA(YN+1)=CA(YN)+CCA(YN)  (2)


where CA(YN) is the amount of carbon in the atmosphere in year YN, 2780 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide today. Other forms of carbon contribute to global warming, most notably methane, although by weight they represent a small component


If CEX(YN) is set to zero than the only way one could possibly stop adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere would be to reduce our emissions to be equal to the natural uptake. However, CN(YN) itself varies greatly and can be a net addition to the atmosphere from the much larger natural carbon cycle which adds and subtracts carbon at about 750 gigatonnes of carbon per year. It is the shifts in this natural balance that has caused climate change before our species existed and will also continue to do so in the future. Thus, it is clear that there is no solution that only reduces human contributions to carbon dioxide emissions that can remove the risk of climate change. With air extraction and the capability to increase or decrease the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere one can in principle compensate for other greenhouse gases like methane that can change their concentrations and cause climate change.


Accordingly, there is a broadly recognized need for a system and method for reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere created by burning of fossil fuels and for providing a low cost, non-polluting renewable energy source as a substitute for fossil fuels.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A system for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere to reduce global warming and which can increase availability of renewable energy or non-fuel products such as fertilizers and construction materials according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention comprises an air extraction system that collects carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through a medium and removes carbon dioxide from the medium by using process heat to heat the medium, a collection system that isolates the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of sequestration, storage and generation of a renewable carbon fuel, and one or more energy sources that provides a supply of process heat to the air extraction system to remove the carbon dioxide from the medium.


In at least one embodiment, the one or more energy sources are selected from the group of energy sources consisting of: fossil fuel, geothermal, nuclear, solar, biomass and other renewable energy sources.


In at least one embodiment, the air extraction system comprises an air contactor that includes the medium to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.


In at least one embodiment, the air contactor is selected from the group of air contactors consisting of: convection towers, absorption pools, packed scrubbing towers, and gaseous separation systems, some having pancake shaped area substrates with a medium that extracts carbon dioxide from the air. In its broadest context, the present invention contemplates structures in which the air is passed into contact with the medium that extracts the CO2. Currently, in the most likely embodiment the structure would have a large area perpendicular to the air flow and be very thin in the direction of air flow with the medium being a porous substrate on to the surface of which the amine or alternative that binds the CO2 is attached—that medium would also have a large cross-section and be very thin like the contactor structure that houses it).


In at least one embodiment, the medium is selected from the group of mediums consisting of: a liquid, a porous solid, a gas and mixtures thereof.


In at least one embodiment, the medium is an NaOH solution.


In at least one embodiment, the medium comprises an amine.


In at least one embodiment, the air extraction system collects carbon dioxide and the sequestration system isolates the removed carbon dioxide.


In at least one embodiment, the location is underground.


In at least one embodiment, the location is at a remote site upwind from one or more other components of the system.


A method for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere to reduce global warming and increase availability of renewable energy according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention comprises the steps of: collecting air from the atmosphere; removing carbon dioxide from the collected air by using process heat to heat the medium that removes the carbon dioxide from the collected air; and isolating the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of sequestration, storage and generation of a renewable carbon fuel, wherein at least one of the collecting, removing and isolating steps is performed using one or more renewable energy sources.


In at least one embodiment, the step of removing comprises absorbing the carbon dioxide using an absorber, preferably an absorber in the form of a medium carried by a large surface area substrate.


In at least one embodiment, the absorber is an NaOH solution.


In at least one embodiment, the absorber comprises an amine, preferably an amine bound to the surface of (carried by) a large surface area porous substrate.


In at least one embodiment, the step of isolating comprises at least one of mineral sequestration or injection as a pressurized gas into geologic formations.


The principles of the present invention can be used to provide a global thermostat for controlling average temperature of a planet's atmosphere, through the use of a plurality of systems according to the principles of the present invention, each of which is capable of producing a negative carbon dioxide effect on a planet's atmosphere by extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and using process heat for extracting carbon dioxide from the medium and to regenerate the sorbent (medium) for another cycle of adsorption. Thus, the plurality of systems together can effectively extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere at a rate that is faster than the rate at which the carbon dioxide is increasing in the atmosphere (and can generate a renewable carbon fuel using the extracted gases).


Applicants' preferred concept of extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and using process heat to separate carbon dioxide from the collection medium is a significant way of addressing the global warming problem, and goes against the conventional wisdom in the art (and is counterintuitive to those in the art). Specifically, the use of process heat to solve the global warming problem by extracting carbon dioxide (CO2) from the low concentration ambient air is very attractive compared to both the conventional approach of extracting CO2 from high concentration flue gas sources and other schemes known in the art for extracting CO2 from the ambient atmosphere. In the former case it goes directly against conventional wisdom that 300 times lower concentration of the CO2 in ambient atmosphere would expect it to be 300 times more expensive since separation costs are thought to generally scale inversely with the concentration. Thus federally funded efforts have been directed at extracting CO2 from the flue gas emissions of power plants (e.g. clean coal) and experts have publicly claimed that the use of ambient air as opposed to flue gas makes no sense. However, the large infinite size of the ambient air source compared to the finite flue gas source and sources generally is one feature that enables applicants' approach to be effective in spite of conventional wisdom and practice. In the flue gas case the emissions containing the CO2 are at a higher temperature (65-70 degrees centigrade) and therefore regeneration uses higher temperature heat which is more costly than is needed for the cool ambient air (approximately 25-30 degrees centigrade). There are other benefits of applicants' approach including the ability to use very thin separation devices that also provide further process improvements. Thus, it could be less costly to remove CO2 by piping the process heat to a global thermostat facility that operates on the principles of applicants' invention, rather than cleaning up directly its flue emissions. In addition, the applicants' approach would produce negative carbon, actually reducing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, while cleaning up the flue gas would only prevent the CO2 content in the air from increasing.


Further analysis shows that one cannot solve the global warming problem in a timely manner to reduce the great risk it poses by simply cleaning up large stationary fossil fuel sources like coal plants or for that matter by conservation or use of renewables. One needs to actually be able, as is the case in this invention, to extract CO2 from the atmosphere (“negative carbon”) thus reducing the ambient concentration and reducing the thereat of global warming. Other published schemes for extracting CO2 from the ambient atmosphere have used higher temperature heat generally and not process heat specifically and therefore have not been seriously considered because of their high energy costs.


Additionally, it should be noted that applicants' preferred concept for extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere comprises using a large area substrate perpendicular to the air flow, which could be porous with a high surface area, with a medium (e.g. an amine) that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and using process heat to remove carbon dioxide from the medium. Using a relatively large area substrate perpendicular to the direction of air flow is particularly useful, because of the relatively low concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (as opposed to the relatively high concentration that would normally be found in flue gases, for example).


These and other features of this invention are described in, or are apparent from, the following detailed description (and accompanying drawings) of various exemplary embodiments of this invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various exemplary embodiments of this invention will be described in detail, with reference to the following figures, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a generalized block diagram of a system for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an air extraction system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a map illustrating a global thermostat according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a system for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of one version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention;



FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of another version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of still another version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention; and



FIG. 9 is a schematic illustration of yet another version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 is a generalized block diagram of a system, generally designated by reference number 1, for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The system 1 includes an air extraction system 40 and a collection system 50, that isolates the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of sequestration, storage and generation of a renewable carbon fuel or the generation of a non-fuel product such as fertilizer and construction materials. The air extraction system 40 preferably incorporates any known or later-discovered CO2 extraction method, including methods which use a medium to absorb and/or bind CO2 from the atmospheric air by exposing the medium to chemical, electrical and/or physical interaction with the CO2 in the captured air. The medium may be liquid, gaseous or solid, or a combination of liquid, gaseous and solid substances, where in the case of solids, the substance is preferably porous. The medium is preferably recyclable so that after the CO2 is captured by the medium and separated from the medium for sequestration, the medium can be reused for absorption/binding of additional CO2. However, in other embodiments the medium may be sequestered along with the captured CO2. As shown in FIG. 1, the separation of the CO2 from the medium, as well as other processes such as the absorption/binding of CO2 and the sequestration of the CO2 performed by the sequestration system 50, may be made more efficient by the addition of heat to the air extraction system 40. In the present invention, the heat is process heat generated e.g. by a solar energy generator, such as a solar collector, to be described in further detail below. In other embodiments, process heat may be provided by other types of energy sources, such as, for example, fossil fuel, geothermal, nuclear, biomass, and other renewable energy sources. The term “process heat” as used herein refers to the lower temperature heat remaining after the higher temperature heat has been used to generate electricity. More generally, the term “process heat” refers to any low temperature heat remaining after a primary process or that is added by the process itself, such as, for example, exothermic carbonation reactions in which carbon dioxide is stored as a mineral or in fact when it binds to the medium and is captured. Moreover, “process heat” may be provided from the use of sources of energy to produce products other than power or electrical generation. For example, primary processing such as chemical processing, production of cement, steel or aluminum, production of energy products like coal to liquid energy products, refining, may use heat to drive the primary processing, and the unused heat remaining after the primary processing or created during the primary processing would be the process heat of such processing, and can be used in a system or method according to the principles of the present invention.


Applicants' preferred concept of extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and using process heat to separate carbon dioxide from the collection medium is a significant way of addressing the global warming problem, and goes against the conventional wisdom in the art (and is counterintuitive to those in the art). Specifically, the use of process heat to solve the global warming problem by extracting carbon dioxide (CO2) from the low concentration ambient air is very attractive compared to both the conventional approach of extracting CO2 from high concentration flue gas sources and other schemes known in the art for extracting CO2 from the ambient atmosphere. In the former case it goes directly against conventional wisdom that 300 times lower concentration of the CO2 in ambient atmosphere would expect it to be 300 times more expensive since separation costs are thought to generally scale inversely with the concentration. Thus federally funded efforts have been directed at extracting CO2 from the flue gas emissions of power plants (e.g. clean coal) and experts have publicly claimed that the use of ambient air as opposed to flue gas makes no sense. However, the large infinite size of the ambient air source compared to the finite flue gas source and sources generally is one feature that enables applicants' approach to be effective in spite of conventional wisdom and practice. In the flue gas case the emissions containing the CO2 are at a higher temperature (65-70 degrees centigrade) and therefore regeneration uses higher temperature heat which is more costly than is needed for the cool ambient air (approximately 25-30 degrees centigrade). There are other benefits of applicants' approach including the ability to use very thin separation devices that also provide further process improvements. Thus, it could be less costly to remove CO2 by piping the process heat to a global thermostat facility that operates on the principles of applicants' invention, rather than cleaning up directly its flue emissions. In addition, the applicants' approach would produce negative carbon, actually reducing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, while cleaning up the flue gas would only prevent the CO2 content in the air from increasing.


Further analysis shows that one cannot solve the global warming problem in a timely manner to reduce the great risk it poses by simply cleaning up large stationary fossil fuel sources like coal plants or for that matter by conservation or use of renewables. One needs to actually be able, as is the case in this invention, to extract CO2 from the atmosphere (“negative carbon”) thus reducing the ambient concentration and reducing the threat of global warming. Other published schemes for extracting CO2 from the ambient atmosphere have used higher temperature heat generally and not process heat specifically and therefore have not been seriously considered because of their high energy costs.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system, generally designated by reference number 2, for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The system 2 includes a solar collector 10, an optional supplemental energy source 20, a power generator 30, an air extraction system 42 and a collection system 50. Each of these components of the system 1 are explained in detail below.


The solar collector 10 may be any known or future-discovered solar energy collection system, which may include solar energy collection units, such as, for example, concentrated solar power parabolic mirrors, and concentrated solar power towers. As is known in the art, the solar collector 10 converts solar energy to thermal energy, which may be used to drive the power generator 30. Residual thermal energy (i.e., process heat) may be used to drive the air extraction system 42 and/or the collection system 50. For example, the process heat may be used to improve the efficiency of chemical and/or physical reactions used in the air extraction system 42 to absorb CO2 from the air and/or to drive off the CO2 from the medium. In addition, in other exemplary embodiments, as shown by the dashed arrows in FIG. 2, direct heat from the solar collector 10 may be used to drive the air extraction system 42 and/or the collection system 50.


The power generator 30 may be, for example, a thermal power generator that converts the thermal energy provided by the solar collector to electricity. As is known in the art, the suns heat may be focused on a medium, such as molten salts, that is then used to generate high temperature, high pressure steam that drives a turbine to generate electricity. The generated electricity may then be used to power the other components of the system 2, in addition to providing power to the general population as part of a power grid. In this regard, the thermal energy provided by the solar collector 10 may be supplemented by energy generated by the supplemental energy source 20. For example, the supplemental energy source 20 may be a waste incineration plant, which provides additional thermal energy to drive the power generator 30. Also, it should be appreciated that any other type of renewable energy source may be used in addition to solar energy, and preferably a renewable energy source that produces heat as a precursor to the generation of electricity. Other potential renewable energy sources to be used in addition to solar energy include, for example, nuclear, biomass, and geothermal energy sources.


Alternatively, the power generator 30 may be any known or later discovered fossil fuel facility (plant) that relies on the burning of fossil fuels, such as, for example, coal, fuel oil, natural gas and oil shale, for the generation of electricity. The power generator may also be for a purpose other than generating electricity (for example the power generator could be for chemical processing, or various other purposes like producing aluminum). The thermal energy produced by the fossil fuel power plant 30 is used to produce electricity and the residual thermal energy (i.e., process heat) may be used to drive the air extraction system 42 and/or the sequestration system 50. For example, the process heat from the fossil fuel power plant 30 may be used to improve the efficiency of chemical and/or physical reactions used in the air extraction system 42 to absorb CO2 from the air and/or to drive off the CO2 from the medium. The residual heat provided by the fossil fuel power plant 30 may be supplemented by energy generated by a supplemental energy source. For example, the supplemental energy source may be a waste incineration plant or a renewable energy source, such as, for example, solar, nuclear, biomass, and geothermal energy sources, which provides additional thermal energy to drive the air extraction system 42 and/or the collection system 50. Process heat from the supplemental energy source may also be used to drive the air extraction system 42 and/or the collection system 50.


Moreover, as described above, “process heat” may be provided from the use of sources of energy to produce products other than power or electrical generation. For example, primary processing such as chemical processing, production of cement, steel or aluminum, refining, production of energy products like coal and liquid energy products, may use heat to drive the primary processing, and the unused heat remaining after the primary processing or created during the primary processing would be the process heat of such processing, and can be used in a system or method according to the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the air extractor system 42 useable with the system 2 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The air extractor system 42 includes an air contactor 41, a causticizer 43, a slaker 45, a calciner 47 and a capture unit 49. The air contactor 41 may use a sorbent material to selectively capture CO2 from the air, and may be composed of any known or later-discovered contactor structures, such as, for example, large convection towers, open, stagnant pools, and packed scrubbing towers. In the present embodiment, the sorbent material may be sodium hydroxide (NaOH), which readily absorbs CO2 from the air. It should be appreciated that other known or future-discovered capture methods may be used, such as, for example, chemical absorption, physical and chemical adsorption, low-temperature distillation, gas-separation membranes, mineralization/biomineralization and vegetation. As a further example, as known in the art, aqueous amine solutions or amine enriched solid sorbents may be used to absorb CO2. Preferably, the sorbent material is regenerated and the capture method requires less than about 100-120° C. heat to regenerate the sorbent material.


In this embodiment, at the air contactor 41, CO2 may be absorbed into an NaOH solution forming sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), e.g. in the manner described by Stolaroff et all in an article entitled “A pilot-scale prototype contactor for CO2 capture from ambient air: cost and energy requirements”, which article can be found at www.ucalgary.ca/˜keith/papers/84.Stolaroff.AirCaptureGHGT-8.p.pdf, and is incorporated herein by reference. Of course, other known or future-developed absorbers may also be used as an alternative or in addition to an NaOH solution. The generated Na2CO3 is then sent to the causticizer 43, where the NaOH is regenerated by addition of lime (CaO) in a batch process. The resulting CaCO3 solid is sent to the calciner 47 where it is heated in a kiln to regenerate the CaO, driving off the CO2 in a process known as calcination. The regenerated CaO is then sent through the slaker 45, which produces slaked lime Ca(OH)2 for use in the causticizer 43.


The capture unit 49 captures the CO2 driven off at the calciner 47 using any know or later-discovered CO2 capturing method that is effective in the low concentrations in which CO2 is present in the atmosphere and that needs only low temperature heat for regeneration. For example, the capture unit 49 may use an amine based capture system, such as the system described in Gray et al U.S. Pat. No. 6,547,854, dated Apr. 15, 2003, and also Sirwardane U.S. Pat. No. 6,908,497, dated Jun. 21, 2005, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. The capture unit 49 may also compress the captured CO2 to liquid form so that the CO2 may be more easily sequestered.


The collection system 50 isolates the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of sequestration, storage and generation of a renewable carbon fuel or the generation of a non-fuel product such as fertilizer and construction materials. The collection system 50 may use any known or future-discovered carbon, sequestration and/or storing techniques, such as, for example, injection into geologic formations or mineral sequestration. In the case of injection, the captured CO2 may be sequestered in geologic formations such as, for example, oil and gas reservoirs, unmineable coal seams and deep saline reservoirs. In this regard, in many cases, injection of CO2 into a geologic formation may enhance the recovery of hydrocarbons, providing the value-added byproducts that can offset the cost of CO2 capture and collection. For example, injection of CO2 into an oil or natural gas reservoir pushes out the product in a process known as enhanced oil recovery. The captured CO2 may be sequestered underground, and according to at least one embodiment of the invention at a remote site upwind from the other components of the system 2 so that any leakage from the site is re-captured by the system 2.


In regards to mineral sequestration, CO2 may be sequestered by a carbonation reaction with calcium and magnesium silicates, which occur naturally as mineral deposits. For example, as shown in reactions (1) and (2) below, CO2 may be reacted with forsterite and serpentine, which produces solid calcium and magnesium carbonates in an exothermic reaction.

½Mg2SiO4+CO2═MgCO3+½SiO2+95 kJ/mole  (1)
⅓Mg3Si2O5(OH)4+CO2═MgCO3+⅔SiO2+⅔H2O+64 kJ/mole  (2)


Both of these reactions are favored at low temperatures. In this regard, both the air capture and air sequestration processes described herein may use electricity and/or thermal energy generated by the solar collector 10 (or other renewable energy source) to drive the necessary reactions and power the appropriate system components. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a high temperature carrier may be heated up to a temperature in a range of about 400° C. to about 500° C. to generate steam to run a generator for electricity, and the lower temperature steam that exits from the electrical generating turbines can be used to drive off the CO2 and regenerate the sorbent (e.g., NaOH). The temperature of the high temperature heat, the generated electricity and the temperature of the lower temperature process heat remaining after electricity production can be adjusted to produce the mix of electricity production and CO2 removal that is considered optimal for a given application. In addition, in exemplary embodiments, still lower temperature process heat that emerges out of the capture and sequestration steps may be used to cool equipment used in these steps.


One or more systems for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere may be used as part of a global thermostat according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. By regulating the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and hence the greenhouse effect caused by carbon dioxide and other gas emissions, the system described herein may be used to alter the global average temperature. According to at least one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, several carbon dioxide capture and sequestration systems may be located at different locations across the globe so that operation of the multiple systems may be used to alter the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere and thus change the greenhouse gas heating of the planet. Locations may be chosen so as to have the most effect on areas such as large industrial centers and highly populated cities, or natural point sources of CO2 each of which could create locally higher concentrations of CO2 that would enable more cost efficient capture. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, multiple systems 1 may be scattered across the globe, and international cooperation, including, for example, international funding and agreements, may be used to regulate the construction and control of the systems 1. In this regard, greenhouse gases concentration can be changed to alter the average global temperature of the planet to avoid cooling and warming periods, which can be destructive to human and ecological systems. During the past history of our planet, for example, there have been many periods of glaciation and rapid temperature swings that have caused destruction and even mass extinctions. Such temperature swings in the future could be a direct cause of massive damage and destabilization of human society from conflicts resulting from potential diminished resources. The global thermostat described herein may be the key to preventing such disasters in the decades to come.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a system, generally designated by reference number 100, for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The system 100 includes a renewable energy source 110, an optional supplemental energy source 120, a power generator 130, an air extraction system 142 and a collection system 150. The present embodiment differs from the embodiment of FIG. 2 in that the renewable energy source 110 may be any known or future-discovered energy source besides solar, such as, for example, nuclear, geothermal, and biomass energy sources. Preferably, the renewal energy source produces thermal energy, which can be used to produce electricity and to improve the efficiency of the various chemical and/or physical reactions that take place within the air extraction system 142 and the collection system 150. In this regard, the air extraction system 142 and the collection system 150 may be the same as described with reference to the previous embodiment, or may include components according to any other known or future-discovered air extraction and collection systems. In addition, as shown in FIG. 4 with reference to the previous embodiment, a plurality of systems 100 may be strategically placed across the globe, and control of the systems 100 may be coordinated so as to collectively function as a global thermostat.



FIGS. 6-9 are schematic illustrations of several ways that carbon dioxide can be removed from an atmosphere, according to the principles of the present invention.


Specifically, in FIG. 6, a pair of substrate 600, 602 are illustrated, each of which has a medium (e.g. NAOH, an amine) that can be brought into contact with an atmosphere to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The substrates 600, 602 are pancake shaped (in the sense that they are relatively large area compared to their thickness) oriented vertically, and can each be relatively large (in surface area) and relatively thin (e.g. on the order of a few millimeters, and preferably not thicker than a meter). Each substrate can move (e.g. by a pulley system (not shown) between an upper position in which carbon dioxide laden air is brought into contact with the medium carried by the substrate to remove carbon dioxide from the air, and a lower position in which process heat is directed at the substrate to remove carbon dioxide from the medium. The substrates 600, 602 are porous with large surface areas, so that air directed at a substrate can flow through the substrate. When a substrate is in an upper position (e.g. the position of substrate 600), carbon dioxide laden air is directed at the substrate (e.g. by a fan 604 shown in dashed lines), so that as the air flows through the substrate, the carbon dioxide contacts the medium and is substantially removed from the air. Thus, carbon dioxide laden air is directed at and through the substrate so that carbon dioxide comes into contact with the medium, carbon dioxide is substantially removed from the air by the medium, and air from which the carbon dioxide has been substantially removed is directed away from the substrate. When a substrate is moved to the lower position (e.g. the position of substrate 602), process heat is directed at the substrate (e.g. via a fluid conduit 606), and carbon dioxide is removed (drawn off) by a source of fluid that is directed at the substrate (in the direction shown by arrow 608) and a source of suction 610 by which carbon dioxide that has been removed from the medium is drawn away from the substrate. The substrates 600, 602 can alternatively move between the upper and lower positions, so that the substrate in the upper position is removing carbon dioxide from the air and carbon dioxide is being removed from the substrate in the lower position. It should be noted that rather than the fan, if there are strong winds available natural wind flows can be used to drive the air through the substrate. In addition, as described below, the fan can be replaced with a solar driven source (or by either wind or thermally-driven air currents), in which case the efficiency and cost reduction of extraction of carbon dioxide from atmospheric air can be further improved. Moreover, rather than switching the positions of the substrates, the means for generating the air flows, the flow of process heat, and the flow of carbon dioxide away from the substrate can be switched as carbon dioxide is captured from the air and then extracted from the medium, as will be readily apparent to those in the art.



FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of another version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention. Specifically, in FIG. 7, a pair of substrates 700, 702 are illustrated, each of which has a medium (e.g. NAOH, an amine) that can be brought into contact with an atmosphere to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The substrates 700, 702 are oriented horizontally, and can each be relatively large (in surface area) and relatively thin (e.g. on the order of millimeters or centimeters). Each substrate can move horizontally (e.g. by a pulley system (not shown) between an air extraction position in which carbon dioxide laden air is brought into contact with the medium carried by the substrate to remove carbon dioxide from the air, and a carbon extraction position in which process heat is directed at the substrate to remove carbon dioxide from the medium. The substrates 700, 702 are porous, so that air directed at a substrate can flow through the substrate. When a substrate is in an air extraction position (e.g. the position of substrate 700), carbon dioxide laden air is directed at the substrate (e.g. by a fan 704 shown in dashed lines), so that as the air flows through the substrate, the carbon dioxide contacts the medium and is substantially removed from the air. Thus, carbon dioxide laden air is directed at and through the substrate so that carbon dioxide comes into contact with the medium, carbon dioxide is substantially removed from the air by the medium, and air from which the carbon dioxide has been substantially removed is directed away from the substrate. When a substrate is moved to the carbon extraction position (e.g. the position of substrate 702), process heat is directed at the substrate (e.g. via a fluid conduit 706), and carbon dioxide is removed (drawn off) by a source of fluid that is directed at the substrate (in the direction shown by arrow 708) and a source of suction 710 by which carbon dioxide that has been removed from the medium is drawn away from the substrate. The substrates 700, 702 can alternatively move between the air extraction and carbon extraction positions, so that the substrate in the air extraction position is removing carbon dioxide from the air and carbon dioxide is being removed from the substrate in the carbon extraction position It should be noted that rather than the fan, if there are strong winds available natural wind flows can be used to drive the air through the substrate. In addition, as described below, the fan can be replaced with a solar driven source (or by either wind or thermally-driven air currents), in which case the efficiency and cost reduction of extraction of carbon dioxide from atmospheric air can be further improved. Moreover, rather than switching the positions of the substrates, the means for generating the air flows, the flow of process heat, and the flow of carbon dioxide away from the substrate can be switched as carbon dioxide is captured from the air and then extracted from the medium, as will be readily apparent to those in the art.


The version of the invention shown in FIG. 9 is generally similar to the horizontally oriented version of FIG. 7, but in the version of FIG. 9, rather than a fan being the source that moves the carbon laden air through the substrate in the air extraction position (e.g. substrate 900), there is a source of gas flow that is generated from a solar heating tower or chimney (shown schematically at 912 in FIG. 9). A solar chimney can be generated by heating an air mass with the sun. The solar chimney would have a “skirt” (shown in dashed lines 913 in FIG. 9) that enables the solar heated air to be concentrated in the chimney. Thus, a solar field with a solar chimney can be associated with a system and structure that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and removes carbon dioxide from a medium in the manner shown and described in connection with FIG. 7. However, rather than a fan 704 as the primary driver of carbon dioxide laden air at the substrate, the carbon dioxide laden air is heated by solar energy and that air is allowed to rise in the solar funnel or tower 912. Because of the tendency for the hot air to rise, an upward draft is generated, that would carry with it carbon dioxide laden air, and the substrate 900 would be positioned in the way of that upward draft. Thus, the carbon dioxide laden air would be directed through the substrate 900 in the air extraction position, and carbon dioxide would be removed from the substrate 902 in the carbon extraction position in the same way as shown and described in connection with FIG. 7. By driving the extraction of carbon dioxide from air by solar energy, the costs of extraction are further reduced, and the overall operation is highly renewable. Of course, provision would need to be made for those periods when the sun didn't shine, and some form of driver similar to the fan 704 (FIG. 7) would be needed. But in any case, having periods in which, instead of the fan, replacing the fan with a solar driven source (or by either wind or thermally-driven air currents), the efficiency and cost reduction of extraction of carbon dioxide from atmospheric air can be further improved.



FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of yet another version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention. In FIG. 8, the medium from which carbon dioxide is removed from atmospheric air and from which carbon dioxide is removed from the medium is disposed on a continuously moving substrate 800. The substrate moves through an air extraction zone 814, where carbon dioxide laden air is directed at and through the substrate (which is also porous as with the prior embodiments) so that carbon dioxide is removed from the air. The substrate 800 then moves to a carbon extraction zone 816, where process heat is directed at the substrate and carbon is drawn away from the substrate in the manner described above in connection with FIGS. 6, 7. Then, the substrate 800 moves to and through a heat exchange zone 818 where the temperature of the substrate is lowered (e.g. by the air that flowed through the substrate in the air extraction zone, and by any additional cooling device that may be useful in reducing the temperature of the substrate to a level that enables it to efficiently remove carbon dioxide from the air when the substrate moves back through the extraction zone 814. In addition, the system of FIG. 8 may have another carbon extraction zone 816, where process heat is directed at the substrate and carbon is drawn away from the substrate in the manner described above in connection with FIGS. 6, 7.


It should also be noted that in all of the versions of the invention described above, the removal of carbon dioxide from the air can be at least partially performed under non equilibrium conditions. Additionally, it should be noted that applicants' preferred concept for extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere comprises using a relatively thin, large surface area substrate with a medium (e.g. an amine) that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and using process heat to remove carbon dioxide from the medium. Using a relatively large area substrate perpendicular to the direction of air flow is particularly useful, because of the relatively low concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (as opposed to the relatively high concentration that would normally be found, e.g. in flue gases).


While this invention has been described in conjunction with the exemplary embodiments outlined above, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention, as set forth above, are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A plurality of systems strategically placed across the globe, and coordinated so as to collectively function for extracting CO2 from the atmosphere to reduce the ambient concentration of CO2 in the planet's atmosphere, the plurality of systems being in locations geographically dispersed around the planet each capable of producing a negative carbon dioxide effect on a planet's atmosphere by extracting and collecting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere under ambient conditions, each system comprises an air contactor, wherein the air contactor comprises a porous solid pancake shaped substrate, on the surface of which is attached an amine, the substrate-supported amine being capable of absorbing carbon dioxide from the ambient atmosphere, a collector chamber, capable of receiving the substrate with the attached amine from the air contactor, and a source of steam, operatively connected to the collector chamber and heated from a source of process heat remaining from a primary process using a primary energy source, to provide steam at a temperature of less than about 120° C. to the collector chamber, for extracting and collecting carbon dioxide from the sorbent medium and regenerating the sorbent medium, so that the plurality of systems together can effectively extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in an economically efficient manner.
  • 2. The plurality of systems of claim 1 wherein each of the plurality of systems further comprises: a sequestration system that removes the carbon dioxide from the collector chamber and isolates the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of sequestration, storage and generation of a renewable carbon fuel or non-fuel products such as fertilizers and construction materials.
  • 3. The plurality of systems of claim 2 wherein the process heat is obtained from an adjacent source of carbon dioxide emissions.
  • 4. The plurality of systems of claim 2 wherein the steam provided to the collector chamber is at a temperature of not greater than 100° C.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the primary energy sources are selected from the group of primary energy sources consisting of: fossil fuel, geothermal, nuclear, solar, biomass and other renewable energy sources and exothermic chemical processes whose use for a primary process can result in a supply of process heat.
  • 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the location of at least some of the systems is underground.
RELATED APPLICATIONS/CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a continuation of, and claims priority from application Ser. No. 12/868,915 filed Aug. 26, 2010, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 12/124,864 filed May 21, 2008, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of, and claims priority from, each of the following US Patent Applications: (a) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/825,468, filed on Jul. 6, 2007, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/805,477, filed on May 22, 2007, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/805,271, filed on May 21, 2007, (b) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/805,477, filed on May 22, 2007, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/805,271, filed on May 21, 2007, and (c) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/805,271, filed on May 21, 2007, all of which are entitled “System and Method For Removing Carbon Dioxide From An Atmosphere and Global Thermostat Using The Same”. The contents of each of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (166)
Number Name Date Kind
3466138 Kostas et al. Sep 1969 A
3491031 Stoneburner Jan 1970 A
3725387 McClendon et al. Apr 1973 A
3865924 Gidaspow et al. Feb 1975 A
3880981 Garingarao Apr 1975 A
3948627 Schwarz et al. Apr 1976 A
4047894 Kuhl et al. Sep 1977 A
4152217 Eisenberg et al. May 1979 A
4197421 Steinberg Apr 1980 A
4239515 Yanagioka et al. Dec 1980 A
4243613 Brockhaus et al. Jan 1981 A
4285918 Gustafson Aug 1981 A
4455153 Jakahi Jun 1984 A
4472178 Kumar Sep 1984 A
4497641 Brown et al. Feb 1985 A
4528248 Galbraith Jul 1985 A
4579723 Weltmer et al. Apr 1986 A
4711645 Kumar Dec 1987 A
4762528 Reichl Aug 1988 A
4810266 Zinnen et al. Mar 1989 A
4822383 Brose et al. Apr 1989 A
5061455 Brose et al. Oct 1991 A
5087597 Leal et al. Feb 1992 A
5364887 Konig et al. Nov 1994 A
5376614 Birbara et al. Dec 1994 A
5424051 Nagji et al. Jun 1995 A
5443804 Parker et al. Aug 1995 A
5492683 Birbara et al. Feb 1996 A
5520894 Heesink et al. May 1996 A
5593475 Minh Jan 1997 A
5595238 Mark et al. Jan 1997 A
5635142 Ichiki et al. Jun 1997 A
5642630 Abdelmalek et al. Jul 1997 A
5653785 Horio et al. Aug 1997 A
5876488 Birbara et al. Mar 1999 A
5879432 Morlec et al. Mar 1999 A
5906806 Clark May 1999 A
5928806 Olah et al. Jul 1999 A
5958353 Eyal Sep 1999 A
6004381 Rohrbach et al. Dec 1999 A
6048509 Kawai et al. Apr 2000 A
6090186 Spencer Jul 2000 A
6106595 Spencer Aug 2000 A
6117404 Mimura et al. Sep 2000 A
6174506 Chakravarti et al. Jan 2001 B1
6364938 Birbara et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387337 Pennline et al. May 2002 B1
6540936 Takagi et al. Apr 2003 B1
6547854 Gray et al. Apr 2003 B1
6612485 Lackner et al. Sep 2003 B2
6790430 Lackner et al. Sep 2004 B1
6797039 Spencer Sep 2004 B2
6800331 Bilyk et al. Oct 2004 B2
6873267 Tubel et al. Mar 2005 B1
6890497 Rau et al. May 2005 B2
6908497 Sirwardane Jun 2005 B1
6929680 Krushnevych et al. Aug 2005 B2
7128777 Spencer Oct 2006 B2
7132090 Dziedzic et al. Nov 2006 B2
7141859 DeBoer et al. Nov 2006 B2
7288136 Gray et al. Oct 2007 B1
7385012 Chang et al. Jun 2008 B2
7452406 Little et al. Nov 2008 B2
7988766 White et al. May 2009 B2
7655069 Wright et al. Feb 2010 B2
7658994 Lakshmi Feb 2010 B2
7666250 Blencoe et al. Feb 2010 B1
7699909 Lackner et al. Apr 2010 B2
7708806 Wright et al. May 2010 B2
7795175 Olah et al. Sep 2010 B2
7799310 Lackner et al. Sep 2010 B2
7833328 Lackner et al. Nov 2010 B2
7909911 Lackner et al. Mar 2011 B2
7947239 Lackner et al. May 2011 B2
7976897 Bhat et al. Jul 2011 B2
7993432 Wright et al. Aug 2011 B2
8043594 Lackner et al. Oct 2011 B2
8083836 Wright et al. Dec 2011 B2
8088197 Wright et al. Jan 2012 B2
8118914 Liu et al. Feb 2012 B2
8123842 Pan et al. Feb 2012 B2
8133305 Lackner et al. Mar 2012 B2
8163066 Eisenberger Apr 2012 B2
8491705 Choi et al. Jul 2013 B2
8529664 Deckman et al. Sep 2013 B2
20010004895 Preiss Jun 2001 A1
20010047995 Pozgainer et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020000260 Palvoelgyi et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020083833 Nalette et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020187372 Hall et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030061906 Knunz et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030075012 Knunz et al. Apr 2003 A1
20040142888 Manne et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040213705 Blencoe Oct 2004 A1
20040229045 Hesselmans et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040253159 Hakka et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050180910 Park et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060051274 Wright et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060084063 Costa et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060101945 Lackner et al. May 2006 A1
20060105419 Blankenberg et al. May 2006 A1
20060165574 Sayari Jul 2006 A1
20060168940 Offenhuber et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060178989 Lackner et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060186562 Wright et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060188423 Cadours et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060289003 Lackner et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070004023 Trachtenberg Jan 2007 A1
20070033767 Dodson et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070065490 Schaberg et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070068525 Offenhuber et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070086909 Abenthung et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070187247 Lackner et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070209349 Ripper et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080031801 Lackner et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080064184 Lackner et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080087165 Wright et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080112868 Blencoe May 2008 A1
20080124666 Stocker et al. May 2008 A1
20080138265 Lackner et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080187755 Herfert et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080190567 Winsness et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080227169 Benson et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080250715 Cooper et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080289319 Eisenberger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080289495 Eisenberger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080289499 Eisenberger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080289500 Eisenberger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090101050 Lackner et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090232861 Wright et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090320368 Castaldi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100095842 Lackner et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100105126 Wright et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100116137 Wright et al. May 2010 A1
20100202937 Lackner et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100263534 Chuang Oct 2010 A1
20110027143 Wright et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110027157 Wright et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110033357 Wright et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110033358 Wright et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110041688 Eisenberger Feb 2011 A1
20110041699 Eisenberger Feb 2011 A1
20110056382 Lackner et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110079144 Wright et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110079146 Wright et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110079147 Wright et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110079149 Wright et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110079150 Wright et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110081709 Wright et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110081710 Wright et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110081712 Wright et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110083554 Wright et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110088550 Tirio Apr 2011 A1
20110108421 Lackner et al. May 2011 A1
20110146281 Lackner et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110185897 Wright et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110189075 Wright et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110203174 Lackner Aug 2011 A1
20110203311 Wright et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110206588 Lackner Aug 2011 A1
20110226006 Lackner et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110268636 Lackner et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110293503 Wright et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110296872 Eisenberger Dec 2011 A1
20120058032 Lackner et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120076711 Gebald Mar 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
1709553 Dec 2005 CN
200 01 385 Sep 2000 DE
20021180511 Feb 2002 EP
20021234947 Aug 2002 EP
19842543946 Oct 1984 FR
58 122022 Jul 1983 JP
198459216839 Dec 1984 JP
03-245811 Jan 1991 JP
06-062677 Mar 1994 JP
07-051537 Feb 1995 JP
11-244652 Sep 1999 JP
2001-300250 Oct 2001 JP
2003-326155 Nov 2003 JP
2006-061758 Mar 2006 JP
2006-075717 Mar 2006 JP
WO9608678 Mar 1996 WO
WO9829187 Jul 1998 WO
WO2005026694 Mar 2005 WO
WO2005037746 Apr 2005 WO
WO2005108297 Nov 2005 WO
WO2006009600 Jan 2006 WO
WO2006036396 Apr 2006 WO
WO2008042919 Apr 2008 WO
WO2008063082 May 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Stolaroff, Joshuah et al. “A Pilot-scale prototype contractor for CO2 capture from ambient air; cost and energy requirements.” (2006) www.ucalgary.ca/˜keith/papers/84.Stolaroff.Air . . . .
English abstract, CN 1 303 910 A (Jul. 18, 2001) as cited in U.S. Patent No. 7,795,175.
English abstract, JP 2006-021989 A (Jan. 26, 2006) as cited in U.S. Patent No. 7,795,175.
Xu et al., “Preparations and characterization of novel CO2 ‘molecular basket’ absorbents based on polymer-modified mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41.” Microporus and Mesoporus Materials 62: 29-45 (2003) as cited in U.S. Patent No. 7,795,175.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, dated Dec. 18, 2007, from corresponding International application No. PCT/US2007/074615 as cited in U.S. Patent No. 7,795,175.
Hicks, Jason C. et al.; “Designing Adsorbents for CO2 Capture from Flue GAs-Hyperbranched Aminosilicas Capable of Capturing CO2 Reversibly”; Feb. 2008; J. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. 130, pp. 2902-2903.
Gold, Blanchard; “Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle IGCC”; www.globalgreenhousewarming.com.
Leal, Orlando; “Reversible adsorption of carbon dioxide on amine surface-bonded silica gel”; 1995; Elsevier Science S.A., Inorganica Chimica Acta 240, pp. 183-189.
Dubey, “Science for sustainability: From capturing carbon dioxide from air to environmental impact of a hydrogen economy,” Apr. 2, 2003.
Vaartstra, Brian A., et al., “Advances in Precursor Development for CVD of Barium-Containing Materials.” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 335, pp. 203-208, 1994 Materials Research Society.
Park, Jung Woo, et al., “Strontium B-diketonate complexes with polyamine donor ligands: the synthesis and structural characterization of [Sr(thd)2(L)]n (n=2; L=diethylenetriamine, n+1; L=triethylenetetramine, tetraethylenepentamine and tris(2-aminoethyl)amine) complex.” Polyhedron 19 (2000) 2547-2555.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140004016 A1 Jan 2014 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12868915 Aug 2010 US
Child 14019328 US
Parent 12124864 May 2008 US
Child 12868915 US
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 11825468 Jul 2007 US
Child 12124864 US
Parent 11805477 May 2007 US
Child 11825468 US
Parent 11805271 May 2007 US
Child 11805477 US