1. Field of the Invention
The invention pertains generally to the field of keratoplasty and, more particularly, to a system and method for accurately and consistently applying a thermokeratoplasty applicator to the cornea.
2. Description of Related Art
A variety of eye disorders, such as myopia, keratoconus, and hyperopia, involve abnormal shaping of the cornea. Keratoplasty reshapes the cornea to correct such disorders. For example, with myopia, the shape of the cornea causes the refractive power of an eye to be too great and images to be focused in front of the retina. Flattening aspects of the cornea's shape through keratoplasty decreases the refractive power of an eye with myopia and causes the image to be properly focused at the retina.
Invasive surgical procedures, such as laser-assisted in-situ keratonomileusis (LASIK), may be employed to reshape the cornea. However, such surgical procedures typically require a healing period after surgery. Furthermore, such surgical procedures may involve complications, such as dry eye syndrome caused by the severing of corneal nerves.
Thermokeratoplasty, on the other hand, is a noninvasive procedure that may be used to correct the vision of persons who have disorders associated with abnormal shaping of the cornea, such as myopia, keratoconus, and hyperopia. Thermokeratoplasty, for example, may be performed by applying electrical energy in the microwave or radio frequency (RF) band. In particular, microwave thermokeratoplasty may employ a near field microwave applicator to apply energy to the cornea and raise the corneal temperature. At about 60° C., the collagen fibers in the cornea shrink. The onset of shrinkage is rapid, and stresses resulting from this shrinkage reshape the corneal surface. Thus, application of energy in circular, ring-shaped patterns around the pupil generates heat that may cause aspects of the cornea to flatten and improve vision in the eye. Although thermokeratoplasty has been identified as a technique for eye therapy, there is a need for a practical system that enables more accurate and precise application of thermokeratoplasty in a clinical setting.
In general, the pattern of energy applied to an eye feature during thermokeratoplasty depends on the position of the energy applicator relative to the eye feature, such as a cornea. Thus, to provide reliable application of energy to the eye feature, embodiments according to aspects of the present invention position the applicator in uniform and constant contact with the eye feature while the applicator provides eye therapy. In this way, the relationship between the applicator and the eye feature is more definite and the resulting delivery of energy is more predictable and accurate. The positioning of the applicator provides better electrical and thermal contact. Advantageously, these embodiments also provide a system and method for accurately reproducing sufficient contact between the applicator and the eye feature.
For example, an embodiment provides a system for applying therapy to an eye including an applicator having a conducting element configured to direct energy from an energy source to an application end of the conducting element, where the application end has an eye contact portion. The energy source in this embodiment may be an electrical energy source, and the conducting element may include an outer electrode and an inner electrode separated by a gap, where the two electrical conductors define the application end with the eye contact portion. A positioning system is configured to receive the applicator and position the eye contact portion in stable engagement with the surface of an eye during the application of energy to a targeted feature of the eye, such as the cornea.
In some embodiments, the conducting element is disposed within a housing for the applicator, and an adjustment system is employed to move the conducting element relative to the housing. With the positioning system being attached to the eye surface and the applicator housing being fixed relative to the positioning system, the adjustment system enables controlled movement of the conducting element and the eye contact portion against the eye surface to cause sufficient contact with the targeted eye feature. The adjustment system, for example, may be an electromechanical system.
In particular embodiments, sufficient contact between the applicator and the cornea is determined by causing an observable amount of flattening, or applanation, of the cornea. The applanation provides a constant and uniform pressure against the corneal surface. In other embodiments, a physical measurement device, such as a strain gauge, may be employed to determine when sufficient contact has been established. With such approaches, embodiments can consistently reproduce a specified amount of contact.
While some embodiments may move the applicator into contact against the cornea, further embodiments may employ a controlled vacuum source, for example, to draw or suction the cornea into sufficient contact against the applicator.
These and other aspects of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention when viewed in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to the cross-sectional view of
Operation of the energy source 120 causes energy to be conducted through the energy conducting element 111 to the distal end 100B. As such, the applicator 100 may be employed to apply energy to the cornea 2 of the eye 1 which is positioned at the distal end 100B. As shown further in
As shown in
When the openings 216 are positioned in contact with the eye surface 1A and the vacuum source 140 is activated to create a near vacuum or low pressure within the interior channel 212, the openings 216 operate to suction the attachment element 210 and the eye surface 1A together. To promote sufficient suction between the eye surface 1A and the attachment element 210, the bottom surface 213 of the attachment element 210 may be contoured to fit the shape of the eye more closely. In one example, the vacuum source 140 may be a syringe, but the vacuum source 140 may be any manual or automated system that creates the appropriate amount of suction between the attachment element 210 and the eye surface 1A. Although the attachment element 210 can be stably attached to the eye surface 1A, the attachment element 210 can be detached by removing the vacuum source 140 and equalizing the pressure in the interior channel 212 with the exterior environment.
When applying energy to the cornea 2, the applicator 100 may be centered, for example, over the pupil 3, which is generally coincident with a center portion 2C of the cornea 2. In some embodiments, the positioning system 200 may provide an additional receiving element that is coupled to the attachment element 210 and movable relative to the attachment element 210. The receiving element receives the energy conducting element 111 and can be moved to adjust the position of the energy conducting element 111 with respect to the attachment element 210 and the cornea 2. As such, the energy conducting element 111 can be accurately positioned over the cornea 2 via the position system. In general, the positioning system 200 enables the energy conducting element 111 to apply energy to desired areas of the cornea 2, for example centered about the pupil 3, to achieve the desired reshaping of the cornea 2.
Once the applicator 100 is positioned by the positioning system 200, the energy conducting element 111 can deliver energy to targeted areas of collagen fibers in a mid-depth region 2B of the cornea 2 to shrink the collagen fibers according to a predetermined pattern and reshape the cornea 2 in a desired manner, thereby improving vision through the eye 1. For example, a contribution to the corneal reshaping comes from the contraction of the collagen fibrils found in the upper third of the corneal stroma, lying approximately 75-150 microns below the corneal, i.e., epithelial, surface 2A.
As further illustrated in
With the concentric arrangement of conductors 111A and 111B shown in
The outer diameter of the inner conductor 111B is preferably larger than the pupil 3, over which the applicator 100 is centered. In general, the outer diameter of the inner conductor 111B may be selected to achieve an appropriate change in corneal shape, i.e. keratometry, induced by the exposure to microwave energy. The outer diameter of the inner electrode 111B determines the diameter across which the refractive change to the cornea 2 is made. When the energy conducting element is applied to the corneal surface 2A, the area of the cornea 2 at the periphery of the inner electrode 111B is subject to an energy pattern with substantially the same shape and dimension as the gap 111C between the two microwave conductors 111A and 111B.
Meanwhile, the inner diameter of the outer conductor 111A may be selected to achieve a desired gap between the conductors 111A and 111B. For example, the outer diameter of the inner conductor 111B ranges from about 4 mm to about 10 mm while the inner diameter of the outer conductor 111A ranges from about 4.1 mm to about 12 mm. In some systems, the annular gap 111C may be sufficiently small, e.g., in a range of about 0.1 mm to about 2.0 mm, to minimize exposure of the endothelial layer of the cornea (posterior surface) to elevated temperatures during the application of energy by the applicator 100.
A controller 130 may be employed to selectively apply the energy any number of times according to any predetermined or calculated sequence. In addition, the energy may be applied for any length of time. Furthermore, the magnitude of energy being applied may also be varied. Adjusting such parameters for the application of energy determines the extent of changes that are brought about within the cornea 2. Of course, the system attempts to limit the changes in the cornea 2 to an appropriate amount of shrinkage of collagen fibrils in a selected region. When applying microwave energy to the cornea 2 with the applicator 100, the microwave energy may be applied with low power (of the order of 40 W) and in long pulse lengths (of the order of one second). However, other systems may apply the microwave energy in short pulses. In particular, it may be advantageous to apply the microwave energy with durations that are shorter than the thermal diffusion time in the cornea. For example, the microwave energy may be applied in pulses having a higher power in the range of 500 W to 3 KW and a pulse duration in the range of about 10 milliseconds to about one second.
Referring again to
During operation, the distal end 100B of the applicator 100 as shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, the coolant system 112 is operated, for example, with the controller 130 to deliver pulses of coolant in combination with the delivery of energy to the cornea 2. Advantageously, applying the coolant in the form of pulses can help prevent the creation of a fluid layer between the conductors 111A and 111B and the corneal surface 2A that interferes with the delivery of energy from the energy conducting electrode 111. In particular, the short pulses of coolant may evaporate from the corneal surface 2A or may be removed, for example, by a vacuum (not shown) before the application of the microwave energy. Rather than creating an annular energy pattern according to the dimensions of the conductors 111A and 111B, the presence of a fluid layer may disadvantageously cause a less desirable circle-shaped microwave energy pattern in the cornea 2 with a diameter less than that of the inner conductor 111B. Therefore, to achieve a desired microwave pattern in some embodiments, a substantial flow of coolant or a cooling layer does not exist over the corneal surface 2A during the application of energy to the cornea 2. To further minimize the presence of a fluid layer, as described previously, the coolant may actually be a cool gas, rather than a liquid coolant.
Additionally or alternatively, heat sinks may also be employed to direct heat away from the corneal surface 2A and reduce the temperature at the surface 2A.
As further illustrated in
The embodiments described herein provide a system and method by which the application of energy can accurately and precisely provide the changes in corneal shape that provide the desired improvements in the eye. Unlike other approaches, the embodiments provide consistent and reproducible results, especially to enable the eye therapy to be used in a clinical setting. As described previously, the energy pattern applied by the energy conducting element 111 may be affected by an intermediate fluid layer that interferes with the contact between the energy conducting element 111 and the corneal surface 2A. In general, the application of energy to the cornea 2 depends in part on the position of the distal surfaces 111E and 111F relative to the corneal surface 2A. As a result, to provide reliable application of energy to the cornea 2, embodiments ensure that the distal surfaces 111E and 111F are positioned to make contact with the corneal surface 2A. In this way, the relationship between the energy conducting element 411 and the cornea 2 is more definite and the resulting delivery of energy is more predictable and accurate.
In some embodiments, sufficient contact is determined by causing an observable amount of flattening, or applanation, of the cornea. The applanation provides a constant and uniform pressure against the corneal surface 2A. For example, as illustrated in
The housing 110 and the positioning system 200 combine to keep the distal surfaces 111E and 111F in contact with the corneal surface 2A and maintain the applanation of the cornea 2 as energy is delivered via the energy conducting element 111. In addition, the housing 110 and the positioning system 200 combine to enable reproducible and predictable contact between the distal surfaces 111E and 111F and the corneal surface 2A. For example, as shown in
As shown further in
It is understood, however, that the first coupling system 114 may employ other techniques, e.g. mechanically interlocking or engaging structures, for coupling the housing 110 to the attachment element 210. For example, the central passageway 211 of the attachment element 210 may have a threaded wall which receives the housing 110 in threaded engagement. In such an embodiment, the housing 110 may be screwed into the attachment element 210. The applicator can then be rotated about the Z-axis and moved laterally along the Z-axis to a desired position relative to the cornea 2. Stops may be included on the attachment element 210 to determine the target position of the applicator 100 in the passageway 211.
While the attachment element 210 keeps the applicator housing 110 in stable position relative to the cornea 2, the housing 110 in turn ensures that the distal surfaces 111E and 111F of the energy conducting element 111 maintain the desired amount of pressure against the cornea 2. For example, as shown in
The positions of the connecting element 115A and/or the receiving structure 115B may be adjustable to enable the energy conducting element 111 to occupy a selected position within the housing 110 and provide a desired amount of applanation. For example, as shown in
The adjustment system 300 may be further connected to a user interface system 305 that accepts input from a user and correspondingly operates the adjustment system 300. The user interface system 305, for example, may be a device with a keypad to receive input from a user. The keypad may be part of a processing system, such as a conventional personal computer, with software to control the adjustment system 300. Alternatively, the user interface system 305 may be a device, such as a joystick, that receives instructions from the user through more mechanically oriented input.
On the other hand, as shown further in
As illustrated in
To prevent the energy conducting element 111 from moving too far against the corneal surface 2A, a safety mechanism 116 may be employed as shown in
Like other embodiments described herein, the electromechanical system 310 may be applied to cause applanation of the cornea 2 to ensure sufficient contact has been established between the energy conducting device 111, i.e., the distal contact surfaces 111E and 111F, and the corneal surface 2A. Alternatively, as shown in
It is contemplated that additional intermediate structures may be employed to couple the energy conducting element 111 to the housing 110. For example, as shown in
Although the embodiments of
It is also contemplated that the applicator 100 in alternative embodiments may draw the cornea 2 into desired contact with the energy conducting element 111. As
Although the energy conducting element 111 in the previous embodiments conduct electrical energy to the cornea 2, it is also contemplated that other systems may be employed to apply energy to cause reshaping of the cornea. As shown in
As shown in
As further illustrated in
In addition, a second coupling system 415 is employed to couple the optical energy conducting element 410 to the housing 410. With the optical energy conducting element 411 positioned in the passageway 410A, the second coupling system 415 prevents the energy conducting element 411 from moving relative to the housing 410 along the Z-axis. For example, as illustrated in
Alternatively, an automated adjustment system, as described previously, may be employed in a system using an optical energy conducting element 411. In particular, the automated adjustment system couples the optical energy conducting element 411 to the applicator housing 410, but allows electromechanically controlled movement of the optical energy conducting element 411 relative to the housing 410 along the Z-axis. With the housing 410 stably coupled to the attachment element 210 fixed to the eye surface 2A, the optical energy conducting element 411 may be moved into contact with the corneal surface 2A to provide a flattening pressure on the cornea.
Accordingly, embodiments according to aspects of the present invention provide a system and method for applying a thermokeratoplasty applicator to the cornea. In particular, embodiments provide a system and method for positioning the applicator over the cornea so that the applicator can cause the desired amount of flattening of a cornea and improve vision through the cornea. For example, embodiments may provide the applicator with an eye contact surface that is moved manually, electromechanically, etc. into contact with the corneal surface to physically flatten the cornea as energy is also delivered to the cornea. Advantageously, embodiments provide an improved system and method that facilitates handling and positioning of the applicator to achieve the desired reshaping of a cornea.
While various embodiments in accordance with the present invention have been shown and described, it is understood that the invention is not limited thereto. The present invention may be changed, modified and further applied by those skilled in the art. For example, although the applicators 200 and 400 in the examples above are separate elements received into the positioning system 200, the applicator 200 or 400 and the positioning system 200 may be combined to form a more integrated device. Thus, embodiments may include an integrated applicator housing and positioning system that receives and positions an energy conducting element against the cornea. Additionally, although the attachment element 210 in the embodiments above may be a vacuum device which is auctioned to the eye surface, it is contemplated that other types of attachment elements may be employed. For instance, the attachment element may be fixed to other portions of the head. Therefore, this invention is not limited to the detail shown and described previously, but also includes all such changes and modifications.
It is also understood that the Figures provided in the present application are merely illustrative and serve to provide a clear understanding of the concepts described herein. The Figures are not “to scale” and do not limit embodiments to the specific configurations and spatial relationships illustrated therein. In addition, the elements shown in each Figure may omit some features of the illustrated embodiment for simplicity, but such omissions are not intended to limit the embodiment.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3776230 | Neefe | Dec 1973 | A |
4326529 | Doss et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4381007 | Doss | Apr 1983 | A |
4490022 | Reynolds | Dec 1984 | A |
4546773 | Kremer et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4712543 | Baron | Dec 1987 | A |
4743725 | Risman | May 1988 | A |
4796623 | Krasner et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4805616 | Pao | Feb 1989 | A |
4881543 | Trembly et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4891043 | Zeimer et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4943296 | Funakubo et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4994058 | Raven et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5103005 | Gyure et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5171254 | Sher | Dec 1992 | A |
5281211 | Parel et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5332802 | Kelman et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5370644 | Langberg | Dec 1994 | A |
5395385 | Kilmer et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5437658 | Muller et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5461212 | Seiler et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5490849 | Smith | Feb 1996 | A |
5586134 | Das et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5618284 | Sand | Apr 1997 | A |
5624456 | Hellenkamp | Apr 1997 | A |
5634921 | Hood et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5658278 | Imran et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5766171 | Silvestrini | Jun 1998 | A |
5779696 | Berry et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5814040 | Nelson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830139 | Abreu | Nov 1998 | A |
5873901 | Wu et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5885275 | Muller | Mar 1999 | A |
5910110 | Bastable | Jun 1999 | A |
5919222 | Hjelle et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6033396 | Huang et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6053909 | Shadduck | Apr 2000 | A |
6104959 | Spertell | Aug 2000 | A |
6139876 | Kolta | Oct 2000 | A |
6149646 | West, Jr. et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161544 | DeVore et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162210 | Shadduck | Dec 2000 | A |
6293938 | Muller | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6319273 | Chen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325792 | Swinger et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334074 | Spertell | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342053 | Berry | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6402739 | Neev | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413255 | Stern | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6520956 | Huang | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6617963 | Watters et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6749604 | Eggers et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6946440 | DeWoolfson et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7044945 | Sand | May 2006 | B2 |
7130835 | Cox et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7141049 | Stern et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7192429 | Trembly | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7270658 | Woloszko et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7402562 | DeWoolfson | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7713268 | Trembly | May 2010 | B2 |
20010034502 | Moberg et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020002369 | Hood | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013579 | Silvestrini | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020035345 | Beck | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049437 | Silvestrini | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020077699 | Olivieri et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099363 | Woodward et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020164379 | Nishihara et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030018255 | Martin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030097130 | Muller et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030175259 | Karageozian | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030216728 | Stern et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040001821 | Silver et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040002640 | Luce | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040111086 | Trembly | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143250 | Trembly | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040199158 | Hood et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243160 | Shiuey et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033202 | Chow et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070977 | Molina | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050183732 | Edwards | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197657 | Goth et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050287217 | Levin et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060135957 | Panescu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149343 | Altshuler et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060189964 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206110 | Knowlton et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060254851 | Karamuk | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287649 | Ormsby et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287662 | Berry et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070048340 | Ferren et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055227 | Khalaj et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074722 | Giroux et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070114946 | Goetze et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123845 | Lubatschowski | May 2007 | A1 |
20070161976 | Trembly | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179564 | Harold | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203547 | Costello et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070244470 | Barker et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244496 | Hellenkamp | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080015660 | Herekar | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027328 | Klopotek et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090024117 | Muller | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054879 | Berry | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069798 | Muller et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090149842 | Muller et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090149923 | Herekar | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171305 | El Hage | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187173 | Muller | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209954 | Muller et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100094197 | Marshall et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 561 440 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 790 383 | May 2007 | EP |
2 269 531 | Jan 2011 | EP |
WO 9917690 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0009027 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0074648 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 2004052223 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2006128038 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007022993 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007120457 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2009012490 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009073213 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009094467 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2010039854 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2011050164 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US09/31718, dated Mar. 4, 2009. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US09/31718, dated Mar. 4, 2009. |
Alain Chandonnet et al., “CO2 Laser Annular Thermokeratoplasty: A Preliminary Study”, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 12:264-273 (1992), Wiley-Lill, Inc., pp. 264-273. |
International Search Report for PCT/US08/76062, dated Nov. 7, 2008, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US08/76062, dated Nov. 7, 2008, 7 pages. |
Berjano et al.; “Radio-Frequency Heating of the Cornea: Theoretical Model and In Vitro Experiments”; IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering; vol. 49; No. 3; Mar. 2002; pp. 196-205. |
Berjano et. al.; “Ring Electrode for Radio-Frequency Heating of the Cornea: Modelling and in Vitro Experiments”; Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 2003; vol. 41; pp. 630-639. |
International Search Report mailed Aug. 14, 2009 for PCT/US2009/042204, (5 pages). |
International Search Report mailed Nov. 20, 2009 for PCT/2009/059061 (3 pages). |
International Search Report mailed Nov. 6, 2009 for PCT/US2009/057481 (2 pages). |
International Search Report for PCT/US2010/029806 dated Jun. 1, 2010 (3 pages). |
Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/029806 dated Jun. 1, 2010 (6 pages). |
International Search Report for PCT/US2010/029791 dated Jun. 1, 2010 (3 pages). |
Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/029791 dated Jun. 1, 2010 (6 pages). |
Trembly et al.; Microwave Thermal Keratoplasty for Myopia: Keratoscopic Evaluation in Procine Eyes; Journal of Refractive Surgery; vol. 17; Nov./Dec. 2001; (8 pages). |
Muller et al., Br. J. Opthalmol 2001; 85:437-443 (April). |
Naoumidi et al., J. Cataract Refract Surg. May 2006; 32(5):732-41. |
Pallikaris et al., J. Cataract Refract Surg. Aug. 2005; 31(8):1520-29. |
Acosta et al., Cornea. Aug. 2006;25(7):830-8. |
European Search Report and Written Opinion for EP 08799473.7, European Patent Office, dated May 24, 2011 (6 pages). |
Search Report corresponding to International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/031718, United States Patent Office; dated Mar. 4, 2009 (2 pages). |
Written Opinion corresponding to International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/ U52009/031718, United States Patent Office; dated Mar. 4, 2009 (5 pages). |
AlióJL, Amparo F, Ortiz D, Moreno L, “Corneal Multifocality With Excimer Laser for Presbyopia Correction,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 20, Jul. 2009, pp. 264-271 (8 pages). |
AlióJL, Chaubard JJ, Caliz A, Sala E, Patel S, “Correction of Presbyopia by Technovision Central Multifocal LASIK (PresbyLASIK),” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 22, May 2006, pp. 453-460 (8 pages). |
Anderson K, El-Sheikh A, Newson T, “Application of Structural Analysis to the Mechanical Behavior of the Cornea,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 1, May 2004, pp. 3-15 (13 pages). |
Andreassen TT, Simonsen Ah, Oxlund H, “Biomechanical Properties of Keratoconus and Normal Corneas,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 31, Oct. 1980, pp. 435-441 (7 pages). |
Anschutz T, “Laser Correction of Hyperopia and Presbyopia,” International Ophthalmology Clinics, vol. 34, No. 4, Fall 1994, pp. 107-137 (33 pages). |
Bailey MD, Zadnik K, “Outcomes of LASIK for Myopia With FDA-Approved Lasers,” Cornea, vol. 26, No. 3, Apr. 2007, pp. 246-254 (9 pages). |
Borja D, Manns F, Lamar P, Rosen A, Fernandez V, Parel TM, “Preparation and Hydration Control of Corneal Tissue Strips for Experimental Use,” Cornea, vol. 23, No. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 61-66 (7 pages). |
Bower KS, Weichel ED, Kim TJ, “Overview of Refractive Surgery,” Am Fam Physician, vol. 64, No. 7, Oct. 2001, pp. 1183-1190 (8 pages). |
Braun EH, Lee J, Steinert RF, “Monovision in LASIK,” Ophthalmology, vol. 115, No. 7, Jul. 2008, pp. 1196-1202 (7 pages). |
Bryant MR, Marchi V, Juhasz T, “Mathematical Models of Picosecond Laser Keratomileusis for High Myopia,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 16, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2000, pp. 155-162 (9 pages). |
Bryant MR, McDonnell PJ, “Constitutive Laws for Biomechanical Modeling of Refractive Surgery,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 118, Nov. 1996, pp. 473-481 (10 pages). |
Buzard KA, Fundingsland BR, “Excimer Laser Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis for Hyperopia,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 25, Feb. 1999, pp. 197-204 (8 pages). |
Charman WN, “The Eye in Focus: Accommodation and Presbyopia,” Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 91, May 2008, pp. 207-225 (19 pages). |
Corbett et al, “Effect of Collagenase Inhibitors on Coreal Haze after PRK”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 72, Issue 3, pp. 253-259, dated Jan. 29, 2001 (7 pages). |
Cox CA, Krueger RR, “Monovision with Laser Vision Correction,” Ophthalmology Clinics of North Amermica, vol. 19, No. 1, Mar. 2006, pp. 71-75 (7 pages). |
Doss JD, Albillar JI, “A Technique for the Selective Heating of Corneal Stroma,” Contact & lntraocular Lens Medical Journal, vol. 6, No. 1, Jan.-Mar. 1980, pp. 13-17 (8 pages). |
Elsheikh A, Anderson K, “Comparative Study of Corneal Strip Extensometry and Inflation Tests,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 2, May 2005, pp. 177-185 (10 pages). |
Evans BJW, “Monovision: a Review,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 27, Jan. 2007, pp. 417-439 (23 pages). |
Gasset AR, Kaufman HE, “Thermokeratoplasty in the Treatment of Keratoconus,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 79, Feb. 1975, pp. 226-232 (8 pages). |
Gloster J, Perkins ES, “The Validity of the Imbert-Flick Law as Applied to Applanation Tonometry,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 2, Jul. 1963, pp. 274-283 (10 pages). |
Gupta N, Naroo SA, “Factors Influencing Patient Choice of Refractive Surgery or Contact Lenses and Choice of Centre,” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, vol. 29, Mar. 2006, pp. 17-23 (7 pages). |
Hamilton DR, Hardten DR, Lindstrom RL, “Thermal Keratoplasty,” Cornea, 2nd Edition, Chapter 167, 2005, pp. 2033-2045 (13 pages). |
Hersh PS, “Optics of Conductive Keratoplasty: Implication for Presbyopia Management,” Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, vol. 103, 2005, pp. 412-456 (45 pages). |
Hjortdal JO, “Extensibility of the Normo-Hydrated Human Cornea,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 73, No. 1, Feb. 1995, pp. 12-17 (7 pages). |
Hori-Komai Y, Toda I, Asano-Kato N, Tsubota K, “Reasons for Not Performing Refractive Surgery,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 28, May 2002, pp. 795-797 (3 pages). |
Illueca C, AlióJL, Mas D, Ortiz D, Pérez J, Espinosa J, Esperanza S, “Pseudoaccommodation and Visual Acuity with Technovision PresbyLASIK and a Theoretical Simulated Array® Multifocal Intraocular Lens,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 24, Apr. 2008, pp. 344-349 (6 pages). |
Jain S, Arora I, Azar DT, “Success of Monovision in Presbyopes: Review of the Literature and Potential Applications to Refractive Surgery,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 40, No. 6, May-Jun. 1996, pp. 491-499 (9 pages). |
Jin GJC, Lyle A, Merkley KH, “Laser in Situ Keratomileusis for Primary Hyperopia,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, Apr. 2005, pp. 776-784 (9 pages). |
Kaliske M, “A Formulation of Elasticity and Viscoelasticity for Fibre Reinforced Material at Small and Finite Strains,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 185, 2000, pp. 225-243 (19 pages). |
Llovet F, Galal A, Benitez-del-Castillo J-M, Ortega J, Martin C, Baviera J, “One-Year Results of Excimer Laser in Situ Keratomileusis for Hyperopia,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 35, Jul. 2009, pp. 1156-1165 (10 pages). |
Loarie TM, Applegate D, Kuenne CB, Choi LJ, Horowitz DP, “Use of Market Segmentation to Identify Untapped Consumer Needs in Vision Correction Surgery for Future Growth,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 19, No. 5, Sep.-Oct. 2003, pp. 566-576 (12 pages). |
Maxwell WA, Lane SS, Zhou F, “Performance of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses in Distance Optical Bench Tests,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 35, Jan. 2009, pp. 166-171 (6 pages). |
McDonald MB, Durrie D, Asbell P, Maloney R, Nichamin L, “Treatment of Presbyopia With Conductive Keratoplasty: Six-Month Results of the 1-Year United States FDA Clinical Trial,” Cornea, vol. 23, No. 7, Oct. 2004, pp. 661-668 (8 pages). |
McDonald MB, “Conductive Keratoplasty: a Radiofrequency-Based Technique for the Correction of Hyperopia,” Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, vol. 103, Dec. 2005, pp. 512-536 (25 pages). |
Moriera MD, Garbus JJ, Fasano A, Lee M, Clapham TN, McDonnel PJ, “Multifocal Corneal Topographic Changes With Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 110, Jul. 1992, pp. 994-999 (6 pages). |
Nash IS, Greene PR, Foster CS, “Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Keratoconus and Normal Corneas,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 35, 1982, pp. 413-424 (12 pages). |
Newman JM, “Analysis, Interpretation, and Prescription for the Ametropias and Heterophorias,” Borish's Clinical Refraction, 1998, pp. 776-822 (49 pages). |
Pandolfi A, Manganiello F, “A Model for the Human Cornea: Formulation and Numerical Analysis,” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 5, Jan. 2006, pp. 237-246 (10 pages). |
Pertaub R, Ryan TP, “Numerical Model and Analysis of an Energy-Based System Using Microwaves for Vision Correction,” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7181, Feb. 2009, p. 718105-1 to 718105-14 (14 pages). |
Petroll WM, Roy P, Chuong CJ, Hall B, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV, “Measurement of Surgically Induced Corneal Deformations Using Three-Dimensional Confocal Microscopy,” Cornea, vol. 15, No. 2, Mar. 1996, pp. 154-164 (12 pages). |
Pinelli R, Ortiz D, Simonetto A, Bacchi C, Sala E, AlióJL, “Correction of Presbyopia in Hyperopia With a Center-Distance Paracentral-Near Technique Using the Technolas 217Z Platform,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 24, May 2008, pp. 494-500 (7 pages). |
Pinsky PM, Datye DV, “A Microstructurally-Based Finite Element Model of the Incised Human Cornea,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 24, No. 10, Apr. 1991, pp. 907-922 (15 pages). |
Pinsky PM, Datye DV, “Numerical Modeling of Radial, Astigmatic, and Hexagonal Keratotomy,” Refractive and Corneal Surgery, vol. 8, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1992, pp. 164-172 (11 pages). |
Pinsky PM, van der Heide D, Chernyak D, “Computational Modeling of Mechanical Anisotropy in the Cornea and Sclera,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, Jan. 2005, pp. 136-145 (10 pages). |
Riley C, Chalmers RL, “Survey of Contact Lens-Wearing Habits and Attitudes Toward Methods of Refractive Correction: 2002 Versus 2004,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 82, No. 6, Jun. 2005, pp. 555-561 (7 pages). |
Rosenbloom A, “New Aged and Old Aged: Impact of the Baby Boomer,” Journal of the American Optometry Association, vol. 74, No. 4, Apr. 2003, pp. 211-213 (5 pages). |
Rutzen AR, Roberts CW, Driller J, Gomez D, Lucas BC, Lizzi FL, Coleman DJ., “Production of Corneal Lesions Using High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound,” Cornea, vol. 9, No. 4, Oct. 1990, pp. 324-330 (8 pages). |
Ryan TP, Pertaub R, Meyers SR, Dresher RP, Scharf R., “Experimental Results of a New System Using Microwaves for Vision Correction,” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7181, Feb. 2009, pp. 718106.1 to 718106.17 (17 pages). |
Seiler T, Matallana M, Bende T, “Laser Thermokeratoplasty by Means of a Pulsed Holmium: YAG Laser for Hyperopic Correction,” Refractive and Corneal Surgery, vol. 6, No. 5, Sep.-Oct. 1990, pp. 335-339 (6 pages). |
Seiler T, Matallana M, Sendler S, Bende T, “Does Bowman's Layer Determine the Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea?” Refractive and Corneal Surgery, vol. 8, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1992, pp. 139-142 (6 pages). |
Shin TJ, Vito RP, Johnson LW, McCarey BE, “The Distribution of Strain in the Human Cornea,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 30, No. 5, May 1997, pp. 497-503 (7 pages). |
Solomon KD, Fernandez de Castro LE, Sandoval HP, Biber JM, Groat B, Neff KD, Ying MS, French JW, Donnenfeld ED, Lindstrom RL, “LASIK World Literature Review: Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction,” Ophthalmology, vol. 116, No. 4, Apr. 2009, pp. 691-701 (11 pages). |
Stanley PF, Tanzer DJ, Schallhorn SC, “Laser Refractive Surgery in the United States Navy,” Current Opinion Ophthalmology, vol. 19, Jul. 2008, pp. 321-324 (4 pages). |
Strenk SA, Strenk LM, Koretz JF, “The Mechanism of Presbyopia,” Progress in Retinal Eye Research, vol. 24, May 2005, pp. 379-393 (15 pages). |
Stringer H, Parr J., “Shrinkage Temperature of Eye Collagen,” Nature, Dec. 1964, p. 1307 (1 page). |
Sutton G., Patmore A.L., Joussen A.M., Marshall J., “Mannose 6-Phosphate Reduces Haze Following Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomry,” Lasers and Light, vol. 7, No. 2/3, 1996, pp. 117-119 (3 pages). |
Telandro A., “Pseudo-Accommodation Cornea: a New Concept for Correction of Presbyopia,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 20, No. 5, Sep.-Oct. 2004, pp. S714-S717 (5 pages). |
Trembly BS, Hashizume N, Moodie KL, Cohen KL, Tripoli NK, Hoopes PJ, “Microwave Thermal Keratoplasty for Myopia: Keratoscopic Evaluation in Porcine Eyes,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 17, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2001, pp. 682-688 (8 pages). |
Trembly BS, Keates RH, “Combined Microwave Heating and Surface Cooling of the Cornea,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, No. 1, Jan. 1991, pp. 85-91 (8 pages). |
Truscott RJ, “Presbyopia Emerging from a Blur Towards an Understanding of the Molecular Basis for this Most Common Eye Condition,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 88, Feb. 2009, pp. 241-247 (7 pages). |
Uchio E, Ohno S, Kudoh J, Aoki K, Kisielewicz LT, “Simulation Model of an Eyeball Based on Finite Element Analysis on a Supercomputer,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 83, Jun. 1999, pp. 1106-1111 (7 pages). |
Wang JQ, Zeng YJ, Li XY, “Influence of Some Operational Variables on the Radial Keratotomy Operation,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 84, Jan. 2000, pp. 651-6533 (4 pages). |
Wollensak, G., et al., “Riboflavin/Ultraviolet-A-Induced Collagen Crosslinking for the Treatment of Keratoconus,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Publ., Chicago, IL, US, vol. 135, No. 5, May 1, 2003, pp. 620-627 (8 pages). |
Zelichowska B, Rekas M, Stankiewicz A, Cervino A, Montés-MicóR., “Apodized Diffractive Versus Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses: Optical and Visual Evaluation,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, Dec. 2008, pp. 2036-2042 (7 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090187184 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |