This invention pertains to implantable medical devices such as cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators. In particular, the invention relates to a system and method for implementing telemetry in such devices.
Implantable medical devices, including cardiac rhythm management devices such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators, typically have the capability to communicate data with a device called an external programmer via a radio-frequency telemetry link. One use of such an external programmer is to program the operating parameters of an implanted medical device. For example, the pacing mode and other operating characteristics of a pacemaker are typically modified after implantation in this manner. Modern implantable devices also include the capability for bidirectional communication so that information can be transmitted to the programmer from the implanted device. Among the data that may typically be telemetered from an implantable device are various operating parameters and physiological data, the latter either collected in real-time or stored from previous monitoring operations.
Telemetry systems for implantable medical devices utilize radio-frequency (RF) energy to enable bidirectional communication between the implantable device and an external programmer. An exemplary telemetry system for an external programmer and a cardiac pacemaker is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,562,841, issued to Brockway et al. and assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. A radio-frequency carrier is modulated with digital information, typically by amplitude shift keying where the presence or absence of pulses in the signal constitute binary symbols or bits. The external programmer transmits and receives the radio signal with an antenna incorporated into a wand that can be positioned in proximity to the implanted device. The implantable device also generates and receives radio signals by means of an antenna, typically formed by a wire coil wrapped around the periphery of the inside of the device casing. Most conventional radio-frequency telemetry systems used for implantable medical devices such as cardiac pacemakers utilize inductive coupling between the antennas of the implantable device and an external programmer in order to transmit and receive RF signals. Because the induction field produced by a transmitting antenna falls off rapidly with distance, such systems require close proximity between the implantable device and a wand antenna of the external programmer in order to work properly, usually on the order of a few inches. This requirement is an inconvenience for a clinician and limits the situations in which telemetry can take place.
Wireless radio-frequency communication over greater distances requires the use of far-field telemetry. Communication using far-field radiation can take place over much greater distances, which makes it more convenient to use an external programmer. Also, the increased communication range makes possible other applications of the telemetry system such as remote monitoring of patients and communication with other types of external devices such as network access points. In order for a substantial portion of the energy delivered to an antenna to be emitted as far-field radiation, the wavelength of the driving signal should not be very much larger than the length of the antenna. Far-field radio-frequency communications with an antenna of a size suitable for use in an implantable device therefore requires a carrier in the frequency range of between a few hundred MHz to a few GHz. Active transmitters and receivers for this frequency range require special RF components (typically including SiGe or GaAs semiconductor devices) that consume a significant amount of power (typically tens of milliwatts). Implantable medical devices, however, are powered by a battery contained within the housing of the device that can only supply a limited amount of continuous power before it fails. When the battery fails in an implantable device, it must be replaced which necessitates a re-implantation procedure. Power conservation is thus an important design objective in wireless telemetry systems for implantable medical devices.
A system and method are presented for enabling RF transfer of real-time data collected by an implantable medical device to an external device in a manner which reduces the power requirements of the implantable device. In an exemplary embodiment, the RF transceiver of the implantable device is duty-cycled between the times the implantable device is polled by the external device for collected data. The timing of the duty-cycling may be determined by the external device and communicated to the implantable device during the polling period.
The present invention is a system and method for providing far-field RF telemetry between an implantable medical device and an external device in which power consumption by the implantable device is lessened by managing the duty cycle of the RF transmitting and receiving components. Long-range RF telemetry circuitry (i.e., the transmitter and receiver) typically requires power on the order of tens of milliwatts in order to operate. Implantable cardiac devices in use today, on the other hand, are usually designed to operate with average power in the microwatt range. This means that the RF telemetry circuitry must be duty cycled down in order to meet the power budget of such devices. Previous examples of duty cycling for implantable devices are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,342,408 and 6,993,393, presently assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., and hereby incorporated by reference.
The RF telemetry circuitry of an implantable device can either be powered up or down, referred to as awake and sleep states, respectively. One way in which duty cycling of the implantable device's RF telemetry circuitry can be implemented is a duty cycling mode where a wakeup timer is used to define periodic wakeup intervals at which the implantable device powers up its RF circuitry and listens for a transmission from an external device for a specified period of time, referred to as a wakeup window. If no transmission from the external device is received during the wakeup window while in the duty cycling mode, the implantable device returns to the sleep state until the next wakeup window. Upon receiving a transmission from the external device during the wakeup window, the implantable device enters an operational mode during which it remains in the awake state so that one or more communications sessions can be established where data is transferred between the devices. The communications sessions are established using a medium access control (MAC) protocol by which network participants contend for access to the wireless medium. After all of the communications sessions desired by either the implantable device or external device have been completed, the implantable device leaves the operational mode and goes back to the duty cycling mode.
The wakeup mechanism described above thus operates to enable the implantable device to conserve energy by remaining in an operational mode, where communications sessions can be established, only when data needs to be transferred by either the implantable device or the external device. There are certain situations, however, where although the implantable device needs to remain in the operational mode, its RF transceiver is unused for a large portion of time. One such situation is when real-time data is transferred from the implantable device to the external device. For example, the implantable device may collect physiological data such as cardiac electrograms, cardiac event markers, or various other physiological measurements and then transfer such data to the external device in real-time. (“Real-time data transfer” in this context should be taken to mean transferring the data at the same time or shortly after the data is collected.) The rate at which the data can be transferred over a telemetry channel is much greater than the rate at which the data is actually collected. One way in which data collection and data transfer can be coordinated is by having the external device periodically poll the implantable device for data while it is being collected. Each polling request from the external device initiates a communications session during which the implantable device transfers the data it has collected since the previous polling request. Between the communications sessions, the implantable device collects more data for subsequent transfer. In this scheme, however, the RF transceiver of the implantable device is only used during the communications sessions initiated by polling requests but yet must remain in an awake state between polling requests in order to receive a polling request when it is transmitted.
Presented herein is a method and system which allows duty cycling of the implantable device's RF transceiver during situations in which real-time data is transferred to an external device. In an exemplary embodiment, a telemetry system for an implantable medical device and an external device includes an antenna, an RF transceiver, and a controller incorporated into each of the implantable and external devices. The RF transceiver is interfaced to the controller in the implantable device to enable the RF transmitter and receiver to be powered up or down, referred to as an awake and sleep state, respectively. The implantable device and external device are programmed with a real-time data transfer protocol in which real-time data collected by the implantable device is transmitted to the external device in response to periodic polling requests by the external device. The implantable device and external device are further programmed so that the external device may cause the implantable device to power down its RF transceiver between polling requests by transmitting a sleep command during a communications session initiated by a polling request. The system may further include a wakeup timer incorporated into the implantable device, where the implantable device is programmed to power down its RF transceiver for a predetermined time interval as measured by the wakeup timer upon receipt of the sleep command from the external device. The length of the predetermined time interval may be either a fixed value programmed into the implantable device or may be communicated to the implantable device by the external device. In the latter instance, the length of the predetermined interval may be determined by the external device according to the type of real-time data being collected by the implantable device and/or the data transmission rate of the implantable device.
A specific embodiment of a system which implements duty-cycling of the implantable device during real-time data transfer will now be described with reference to the figures.
A long-range RF receiver 120a or 120b and a long-range RF transmitter 110a or 110b are interfaced to the microprocessor 102a or 102b in the implantable device and the external device, respectively. Also in each device, the transmitter and receiver are coupled to an antenna 101a or 101b through a transmit/receive switch 130a or 130b. The transmit/receive switches 130a and 130b are controlled by the microprocessor and either passes radio-frequency signals from the transmitter to the antenna or from the antenna to the receiver. To effect communications between the devices, a radio-frequency carrier signal modulated with digital data is transmitted wirelessly from one antenna to the other. A demodulator for extracting digital data from the carrier signal is incorporated into each receiver, and a modulator for modulating the carrier signal with digital data is incorporated into each transmitter. The interface to the controller for the RF transmitter and receiver in each device enables data transfer. The implantable device also incorporates a means by which the controller can power up or power down the RF receiver and/or transmitter in order to manage duty cycles in the manner described below. A wakeup timer 180 for defining the RF duty cycle is also shown for the implantable device, and this timer can either be implemented in code executed by the controller or can be discrete components.
A wireless telemetry system for implantable medical devices is generally a multiple access network in which a number of network participants share the available bandwidth of the wireless medium. A medium access control (MAC) protocol may be defined which allows each network participant to acquire exclusive access to the medium before transmitting data to an intended recipient. A collision is said to occur when two or more participants attempt to transmit at the same time. In certain networks, collisions may be detected by the sender listening to the medium when a transmission is initiated to determine if other network activity is present. If a collision is detected, the sender ceases transmitting and waits for a random or defined period before trying again. Most wireless transceivers operate in a half-duplex mode, however, and cannot simultaneously transmit and listen for ongoing network activity. MAC protocols for wireless networks therefore typically use out-of-band signaling or a handshaking protocol to minimize the probability of a collision occurring. In an example of the latter type of protocol, a four-way RTS-CTS-DS-ACK exchange as illustrated by
A particular embodiment of the duty-cycling scheme for real-time data transfer will now be described for an external programmer or remote monitor (PRM/RM) and an implantable device (referred to as a pulse generator or PG) such as illustrated in
In this embodiment, the implantable device is programmed to maintain its RF transceiver in a powered up state if no sleep command is received so that the default for the PG is to stay awake unless told to go to sleep. In this way, if an ACK/s is missed by the PG, it will stay awake and the protocol will operate as designed. The penalty for this behavior is that the device may sometimes stay awake when it does not have to. If the PG were to default to going to sleep and it missed the command from the PRM to stay awake, then the protocol would make repeated attempts to communicate to a PG that is asleep and will not respond, thus wasting bandwidth that could otherwise be used by other sessions.
The external device may also be programmed to not transmit a sleep command if it has an additional command to transmit to the implantable device after receiving a response to a polling request or if the implantable device indicates it has more data to transmit when responding to a polling request. The PRM knows that it has no data to send to the device so that after a real-time data exchange, the ACK could contain the indication to go to sleep (ACK/s). When the PRM receives data to send during an interval that the PG is a sleep state, the PRM will need to wait until the next 100 ms polling period. At the 100 ms boundary the PRM would know that it has data to send and would not indicate to the PG to go to sleep during this interval. In a similar manner, if the PRM does not have data to send but receives a message that the PG has data other than real-time data (e.g., clinical history or device operations data) in response it would not indicate that the implantable device is to go to sleep for the next interval.
Although the invention has been described in conjunction with the foregoing specific embodiments, many alternatives, variations, and modifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such alternatives, variations, and modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the following appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/101,196, filed Apr. 7, 2005, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,903, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/560,077, filed on Apr. 7, 2004, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), both of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4341982 | Lahti et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4404972 | Gordon et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4441498 | Nordling | Apr 1984 | A |
4486739 | Franaszek et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4542535 | Bates et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4562841 | Brockway et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4592360 | Lesnick | Jun 1986 | A |
4731814 | Becker et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4944299 | Silvian | Jul 1990 | A |
5113869 | Nappholz et al. | May 1992 | A |
5171977 | Morrison | Dec 1992 | A |
5300093 | Koestner et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5314453 | Jeutter | May 1994 | A |
5342408 | deCoriolis et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5350411 | Ryan et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5579876 | Adrian et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5766232 | Grevious et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5807397 | Barreras | Sep 1998 | A |
5861019 | Sun et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5881101 | Furman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6009350 | Renken | Dec 1999 | A |
6115583 | Brummer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6115636 | Ryan | Sep 2000 | A |
6155208 | Schell et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167310 | Grevious | Dec 2000 | A |
6169925 | Villaseca et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6240317 | Villaseca et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263246 | Goedeke et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6336903 | Bardy | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6388628 | Dettloff et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6416471 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427088 | Bowman, IV et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6456256 | Amundson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6472991 | Schulman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482154 | Haubrich et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490487 | Kraus et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6531982 | White et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6585644 | Lebel et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6648821 | Lebel et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6659948 | Lebel et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675045 | Mass et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6768730 | Whitehill | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6970735 | Uber, III et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6993393 | Von Arx et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7069086 | Von Arx | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7110823 | Whitehurst et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7155290 | Von et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7319903 | Bange et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324012 | Mann et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7359753 | Bange et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7519430 | Arx et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7539489 | Alexander | May 2009 | B1 |
7573422 | Harvey et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7664553 | Earle | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7738964 | Von Arx et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8055350 | Roberts | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010047125 | Quy | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020019606 | Lebel et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020046276 | Coffey et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049480 | Lebel et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020065509 | Lebel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065540 | Lebel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020109621 | Khair et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030009204 | Amundson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028902 | Cubley et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050535 | Bowman, IV et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030107487 | Korman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114897 | Von Arx et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114898 | Von Arx et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040047434 | Waltho | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050222933 | Wesby | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240245 | Bange et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050283208 | Von Arx et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288738 | Bange et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060029100 | Dove | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060071756 | Steeves | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116744 | Von Arx et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060247736 | Roberts | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070100396 | Freeberg | May 2007 | A1 |
20080215121 | Bange et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100121414 | Roberts | May 2010 | A1 |
20100152816 | Von Arx et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110313491 | Bange et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
08-511702 | Dec 1996 | JP |
WO-9500202 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO-03053515 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-03092240 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO-2005099817 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2005099816 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2006116004 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080114412 A1 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60560077 | Apr 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11101196 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 12004892 | US |