1.0 Field of the Invention
The present disclosure relates to a system and a method for safety management for doors and, more particularly, a system and a method for safety management in roll-up doors that provides improved detection of traffic therethrough and improved control of the motion of the door, among other features.
2.0 Related Art
Currently, door assemblies and/or window assemblies, such as, e.g., for a high performance door used in commercial applications or a garage door, are often constructed with sensors to detect motion or cause a state change of the door or window. High performance roll-up type doors may be provided with two sets of photo electric single beam sensors (aka “photo eyes”) as a standard feature, perhaps as a separate LED warning light. A “set” of photo eyes may include a single beam emitter and receiver pair. Generally, the sensor may react when the light beam between the emitter and receiver is blocked or broken. One set of photo eyes may be located on each side of a door opening. In some applications, the photo eyes may be installed at the factory and may have a fixed position and distance from the moving portion of the door. Alternatively, one or both of the provided photo eyes may be shipped separately or uninstalled with brackets for field installed in accordance with the installation instructions provided.
A “set” of photo eyes that includes a single beam emitter and receiver pair has significant limitations and capabilities. A system that improves on this would be a welcomed addition to safety systems for doors.
In one aspect, a door safety system is provided that comprises a light curtain comprising at least one light emitting device and at least one light receiver device, the light emitter device comprising a plurality of light emitters, the at least one light receiving device comprising a plurality of light detectors for detecting a presence or a lack of presence of one or more of the plurality of beams from the plurality of light emitters, and either or both of the light emitter device and the at least one light receiving device comprising at least one warning light for providing visual warning of movement of a door. The door safety system may further comprise a computer configured to receive at least one signal from the at least on light receiving device, the at least one signal conveying a status of at least one of the plurality of beams. The computer may be further configured to control movement of the door based on the at least one signal. The computer may be configured to determine a height or size of traffic between the light emitter device and the at least one light receiving device based on the at least one signal. The computer may be configured to determine a speed for controlling movement of the door. The computer may be configured to determine a direction of movement of the door. The computer may be configured to stop, reverse or start movement of the door based on the at least one signal. The computer may be configured to control the at least one warning light based on the at least one signal. The computer may be configured to control a pattern of color or flash rate of the at least one warning light. The at least one warning light may comprise a plurality of warning lights and the pattern may be produced across the plurality of warning lights so that plurality of warning lights have different colors, or are activated at different times from each other.
In one aspect, a method for providing a door safety system is provided including providing two light curtains on either side of a centerline of a door, each light curtain comprising: at least one light emitting device and at least one light receiver device, the light emitter device comprising a plurality of light emitters, the at least one light receiving device comprising a plurality of light detectors configured to detect a presence or a lack of presence of one or more of the plurality of beams from the plurality of light emitters, and either or both of the light emitter device and the at least one light receiving device comprising at least one warning light for providing visual warning of movement of a door, and controlling motion of the door and controlling the at least one warning light based on the detected presence or lack of presence of the one or more plurality of beams. The light curtains on either side of a centerline of a door may be separate and spaced apart from the door. The controlled motion of the door may include stopping, reversing or starting movement of the door based on the at least one signal. The step of controlling motion may be based on a determined height of an object passing between the at least one light emitting device and the at least one light receiver device. The step of controlling motion may be based on the determined height, the determined height being a number of blocked beams in a vertical plane between the at least one light emitting device and the at least one light receiver device. The controlling of the at least one warning light may include changing a color of the at least one warning light. The at least one warning light may comprise a plurality of warning lights and the plurality of warning lights may be controlled to change color, change a flash rate or to produce a pattern across the plurality of warning lights based on the detected presence or lack of presence of the one or more plurality of beams. The controlling the at least one warning light may indicate that the door is about to close or is closing. The step of controlling motion of the door may include determining a speed of the door from among multiple possible speeds based on the at least one signal.
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the disclosure, are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the disclosure and together with the detailed description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure. No attempt is made to show structural details of the disclosure in more detail than may be necessary for a fundamental understanding of the disclosure and the various ways in which it may be practiced. In the drawings:
The present disclosure is further described in the detailed description that follows.
The disclosure and the various features and advantageous details thereof are explained more fully with reference to the non-limiting examples that are described and/or illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the following description and attachment. It should be noted that the features illustrated in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale, and features of one example may be employed with other examples as the skilled artisan would recognize, even if not explicitly stated herein. Descriptions of well-known components and processing techniques may be omitted so as to not unnecessarily obscure the examples of the disclosure. The examples used herein are intended merely to facilitate an understanding of ways in which the invention may be practiced and to further enable those of skill in the art to practice the examples of the disclosure. Accordingly, the examples herein should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.
The terms “including”, “comprising” and variations thereof, as used in this disclosure, mean “including, but not limited to”, unless expressly specified otherwise.
The terms “a”, “an”, and “the”, as used in this disclosure, means “one or more”, unless expressly specified otherwise. The term “about” means within plus or minus 10%, unless context indicates otherwise.
Devices that are in communication with each other need not be in continuous communication with each other, unless expressly specified otherwise. In addition, devices that are in communication with each other may communicate directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries.
Although process steps, method steps, algorithms, or the like, may be described in a sequential order, such processes, methods and algorithms may be configured to work in alternate orders. In other words, any sequence or order of steps that may be described does not necessarily indicate a requirement that the steps be performed in that order. The steps of the processes, methods or algorithms described herein may be performed in any order practical. Further, some steps may be performed simultaneously.
When a single device or article is described herein, it will be readily apparent that more than one device or article may be used in place of a single device or article. Similarly, where more than one device or article is described herein, it will be readily apparent that a single device or article may be used in place of the more than one device or article. The functionality or the features of a device may be alternatively embodied by one or more other devices which are not explicitly described as having such functionality or features.
One set of photo eyes is typically located on each side of a door opening formed between side columns 110a, 110b. The structural side columns 110a, 110b are typically associated with a respective wall section 105a, 105b. The photo eyes may be installed at the factory and may have a fixed position and distance from the moving portion of the door 135. On some models, one or both of the provided photo eyes may be shipped loosely with brackets for field installation in accordance with the installation instructions provided. At least one pair and as many as two pair of LED warning lights, depending on model, may be provided (not shown). A “pair” of LED warning lights 116 typically comprises two strips approximately 36″ long. The warning lights may be installed in a similar way as the beams, depending on the door model, relative to some being factory installed and some field installed or a combination of field and factory. The position of the warning lights may be positioned so that any traffic approaching the opening would be provided advanced notice that the door 135 is about to close or is closing via the LED lights 116 in yellow or red colors and flashing or steady states.
Typically, the position of the photo eye beam line (i.e., a photo beam created between an emitter 115 and a receiver 120) may be placed in parallel and as near to the movable door 135 (when closed) or the centerline 125, as is practical. The positioning of the photo eyes in this way is intended to minimize the distance of area between photo eye beams to more immediately identify traffic that may be directly in the downward path of the door 135. In the case of field installed beams, several factors create unavoidable variation in the location of the beams relative to the distance from the door 135 such as a thickness of the wall section 105a, 105b or construction materials, site obstructions, etc. These variations can result in photo eye beam placement as much as 18-24″ from the centerline 125 and may allow traffic to be in the downward path of the door 135, potentially without detection. In situations such as these, a reversing edge system becomes the primary safety sensing device rather than the photo eye beams. The reversing edge system functions only after the edge sensing strip (not shown) located along the leading (i.e., lower) edge of the door 135 comes in contact with the traffic in or passing through the doorway 130.
In order to better explain the benefits of the various novel aspects of the present disclosure, a general description of a typical automatic cycle of a high performance door (such as, e.g., a Rytec Corporation high performance door) is first provided. In applications, the door may be a roll-up door, but may also be other types of doors such as laterally moving doors, panel doors or the like.
A high performance door movement typically begins with the door 135 in the closed position and starts with an automatic activation (aka activator). The activator device is intended to indicate to a door controller (not shown) that the traffic intends to pass through the doorway 130. The activator (not shown) is typically a hands free device that does not require direct human interface or contact. These devices vary in type, placement and ability to sense oncoming traffic. The speed of the approaching traffic towards the door typically dictates the sensing distance necessary for clear passage through the door opening. Because of these variations, the traffic in the door area can be detected but not necessarily when it's very near the door 135. The activator signals an input on the controller that results in the door 135 being driven to the open position at its set maximum speed, typically 45 to 100 inches per second depending on model. Additionally, an activator signal may return a door in the process of a closing move to the open position, and an open door would be held in the open position whenever the activator senses traffic.
After activation and an opening move, the door 135 may come to rest in the full open position. If the activator sensors have cleared (i.e., no traffic is recognized) and the photo eye beams are uninterrupted, the door would begin a user defined timed countdown. At the expiration of the timed countdown, the warning light strips 116 may begin flashing yellow for a user defined amount of time as a pre-announcement to the traffic that the door will begin the closing process soon. At the expiration of the flashing yellow signal, the warning lights 116 may change to a steady or solid red color as an announcement that the door is beginning the closing move and traffic should not proceed. The door closes automatically at the predetermined speed. For a high performance door the closing speed is typically 20-36″ per second depending on model. During closing, the warning lights 116 typically remain red and on steady until the door reaches the closed position.
If at any point in the previously described sequence the beam of either photo eye was blocked or interrupted; a door still in the open position would return to the beginning of the sequence described above; if either beam remained blocked, the sequence would be held at the beginning of the sequence described above; if the door were executing a closing movement the controller would immediately reverse the direction of the door and return to the open position until which time the beams are unobstructed.
In further advancement of the above techniques,
At least one set of light curtains (e.g., 140a/145a, 140b/145b) may be installed on each side of a doorway parallel with the moving part of the door panel, i.e., parallel to the centerline 125. In some applications, more than one set of light curtains (e.g., 140a/145a, 140b/145b) may be installed on each side of the doorway. Relative to location, one significant benefit of this design is that the system does not rely on a close proximity of each light curtain, relative to the moving part of the door 135, to determine if traffic may be in or near the downward path of the moving door panel.
A light curtain component may include a series of LED-type multi-colored lights that serve in a similar fashion to that previously described above. The enhanced design may offer improved visibility, more luminaries, higher intensity and expanded capability.
Based on utilizing the individual signals from each of the numerous beams of each light curtain set (e.g., 140a/145a, 140b/145b), comparative analysis of each set unto themselves and to each other can be processed by the system controller 165. Analytics such as which particular beam or beams are blocked, how many beams are blocked in a vertical plane, blocked beam patterns and equality, blocked time duration, etc., may be performed by the controller 165 and may produce numerous variations in door function, sequence and control. The controller 165 may determine the height of a passing object or person (generically “traffic”) through the doorway 130 based on the state of the beams from one or more light curtain sets (e.g., 140a/145a, 140b/145b). For example, based on the determined height, width and/or overall size, a determination may be made as to whether or not a door 135 may be slowed (or not) and by how much, or whether the door should be stopped or reversed. That is, a suitable speed of the door may be computed from among multiple possible speeds. A decision may be dynamically made to determine if the door 135 direction must be reversed, and perhaps how fast the reversal must occur and speed of the door to move to prevent a possible mishap.
The computer 165 may be configured with a memory and/or a database and may have user programmable parameters predefined. For example, an end user may select how the door and the system 300 react to variations in analytical results through pre-defined parameterization. Examples of variations from normal timing, warning and door speeds may include:
i) Timing:
ii) LED warning lights:
iii) Door closing speed:
The improved safety concept offers the ability to define a space around the downward moving part of the door. Additionally, the distance of the safety curtain from the downward moving part of the door can be increased as the system may recognize traffic that is in or may be near the now guarded area. The system 300 may allow the light curtains to be placed advantageously and without concession relative to the distance from the downward moving parts of the door. No longer is it necessary to place the beams in close proximity so as to detect traffic under the door. The extended distance allows for the advanced notice for need of reversal of a closing door 135 before the point of intersect between the downward moving parts of the door and the traffic through the doorway.
In any case where the controller is unsure or the analytics are unclear, the door could be held open, or close in “slow mode,” at a user's discretion, through adjustable configurations (parameters).
A similar concept may be applied to existing doors equipped with only single beam photo eyes and controller 165. With significantly less analytical information available through these single beam devices, the resulting outcome may likely be more frequent “slow closing” movements but still an improvement in defining the guarded area. Again, the variations in the distance between the field installed photo eyes and the downward moving part of the door may become a non-issue. With backwards compatibility through software upgrade, existing computer controlled doors may benefit from the full or limited design concept with relative ease. A USB port associate with computer 165 (or other I/O port) may allow software upgrade and predetermined formatting of associated parameters.
In some applications multiple light curtain sets (140a/145a and 140b/145b) may be positioned on each side of the centerline 125, spaced apart from one another. In this way, an even earlier detection of motion of an approaching object to the door 135 may be achieved and also a direction of the object passing between the light curtain sets (140a/145a and 140b/145b) may be even more quickly known. For example, it may be determined whether or not the object has stopped and reversed direction while proximate the centerline 125. This may be promptly detected and the computer 165 may determine and cause a new course of action (e.g., changing speed of the door, changing direction of the door, changing a pattern of the warning lights, or the like) based on a new direction or activity of the object within the detection zone of multiple light curtain sets (140a/145a and 140b/145b) on each side of the centerline 125.
While the invention has been described in terms of examples, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modifications in the spirit and scope of the appended claims. These examples are merely illustrative and are not meant to be an exhaustive list of all possible designs, embodiments, applications or modifications of the invention.
This application claims benefit and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/218,328 filed Sep. 14, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2900521 | Eames | Aug 1959 | A |
3183499 | Cowen | May 1965 | A |
3670164 | Hardy | Jun 1972 | A |
3746863 | Pronovost | Jul 1973 | A |
3805061 | De Missimy | Apr 1974 | A |
4029176 | Mills | Jun 1977 | A |
4266124 | Weber | May 1981 | A |
4452009 | Baumeler | Jun 1984 | A |
4853531 | Rejc | Aug 1989 | A |
4866881 | Morrow | Sep 1989 | A |
4894952 | Trett | Jan 1990 | A |
4914859 | Gionet | Apr 1990 | A |
4967083 | Kornbrekke | Oct 1990 | A |
5001557 | Begle | Mar 1991 | A |
5015840 | Blau | May 1991 | A |
RE33668 | Gray | Aug 1991 | E |
5149921 | Picado | Sep 1992 | A |
5193895 | Naruke et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5225689 | Buckle | Jul 1993 | A |
5302942 | Blau | Apr 1994 | A |
5410149 | Winston, Jr. | Apr 1995 | A |
5428923 | Waggamon | Jul 1995 | A |
5641951 | Cai | Jun 1997 | A |
5925858 | Full | Jul 1999 | A |
5929580 | Mullet et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5969637 | Doppelt et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6167991 | Full | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6243006 | Rejc et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6292100 | Dowling | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304178 | Hayashida | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6354716 | Chen | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6678999 | Zengguang | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6737968 | Ergun | May 2004 | B1 |
6756910 | Ohba | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6782660 | Takada | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6812837 | Ikeuchi | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6970085 | Okabe | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7044271 | De Coi | May 2006 | B2 |
7045764 | Beggs | May 2006 | B2 |
7048422 | Solomon | May 2006 | B1 |
7064666 | Sasaki | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071459 | Pustelniak | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084388 | Rejc | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7140469 | Deplazes | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7154112 | Eubelen | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7161319 | Ergun | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7253890 | Miremadi | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7380375 | Maly | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7495556 | Eubelen | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7533431 | Hochstein et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7762304 | La Marca | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7771080 | Platt | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7900398 | Liles, Jr. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7940300 | Spinelli | May 2011 | B2 |
8077034 | Borlez | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8115162 | Shikai | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8145351 | Schininger | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8309904 | De Coi | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8445833 | Klingelhofer | May 2013 | B2 |
8547234 | Maly | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8575538 | De Coi | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8791839 | Citta | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8833524 | De Coi | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8867045 | Piana | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8875441 | Agam | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8904708 | Zacchio | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8988213 | Leutenegger | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9057779 | Pfiffner | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9163446 | Houser et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9292136 | Pratt | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9341013 | Iwata | May 2016 | B2 |
9503184 | Grimm | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9528312 | Shimazu | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9671523 | Gelineau | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9771225 | Stone | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9797184 | Collins | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9830825 | Anstett | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9926148 | Hochstein et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9970230 | Scholten | May 2018 | B2 |
10087049 | Collins | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20050103577 | Warner | May 2005 | A1 |
20060022596 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060162254 | Imai | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080022596 | Boerger | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100037522 | Wirth | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100162629 | Wirth | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100309007 | Goldsmith | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319256 | Agam | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110203059 | Whitley et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110284171 | Daniele | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130062511 | De Coi | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20150315834 | Collins | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160040469 | Lietz | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160047159 | Scholten | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160284175 | Finn et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160298373 | Lietz | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160348429 | Frede | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160348430 | Lorenzani | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160376843 | Schneider | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170138111 | Lietz | May 2017 | A1 |
20170254141 | Iglesias Ballester | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170306696 | Slupik | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170314314 | Collins | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170315262 | Collins | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180002980 | Bartole | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180209198 | Company | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
205594802 | Sep 2016 | CN |
10 2010 017398 | Dec 2011 | DE |
0598630 | Mar 1997 | EP |
1626924 | Feb 2006 | EP |
2 256 277 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2292548 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2 374 985 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2014147292 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015000622 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2016022534 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016029246 | Mar 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
FlexiForce “Force LC2 safety light curtains manual,” Aug. 18, 2014, Obtained from <http://www.flexiforce.com/issuu/cms/uploads/files/Downloads/E-Operators/force%20family/EN/10%20forceLC2%20EN.pdf>. (Year: 2014). |
International Search Report issued in related co-pending PCT/US2016/051721 dated Nov. 17, 2016. |
Extended European Search Report for related EP App. No. 16 847 226.4 dated Apr. 18, 2019, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170074039 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62218328 | Sep 2015 | US |