1. Field
The invention relates generally to the field of telecommunications, and more particularly to systems and methods for scheduling data transmissions in a wireless communication system using scheduling requests and grants.
2. Background
Wireless communication technologies are rapidly advancing, and wireless communication systems are utilized to provide a larger and larger portion of the communications capacity that is currently available to users. This is true despite the additional technological impediments that are faced in implementing a wireless communication system, as compared to a wireline system. For instance, wireless communication systems must deal with issues relating to transmission scheduling between a base station and its mobile stations when the quality of the wireless communication channels between them is constantly changing. The base station and mobile stations must therefore deal with the issue of how much data can be transmitted in light of the prevailing conditions rather than simply scheduling transmissions, as in a wireline system.
One type of wireless communication system comprises a cellular CDMA (code division multiple access) system which is configured to support voice and data communications. This system may have multiple base stations which communicate via wireless channels with multiple mobile stations. (The base stations are also typically coupled via wireline networks to various other systems, such as a base switching station that may couple the base stations to the internet or a public switched telephone network.)
As mobile stations move through the area covered by the wireless communication system, they may communicate with multiple base stations. The mobile stations may also be handed off from one base station to another. This is referred to as a handoff between the base stations. Conventionally, because the mobile stations are handed off from one base station to another, the scheduling of transmissions, particularly transmissions from the mobile stations to the base stations, is handled by the base station controller, which is coupled to the base stations and can therefore account for the handoffs of the mobile stations.
While the transmissions are conventionally scheduled by the base station controller, this does cause some delay in the scheduling. This delay is a result of the fact that the information relevant to scheduling (e.g., a request message) is carried in Layer 3 messages that are first obtained by the base stations, and then transmitted to the base station controller, which makes appropriate scheduling decisions and then transmits the resulting scheduling information back to the base stations. Adding to this delay is the fact that Layer 3 messages have to be processed by the LAC layer (which is above the MAC layer, but below Layer 3). Also, Layer 3 messages are commonly processed by a shared CPU, rather than a dedicated CPU, although this varies from implementation to implementation. Further contributing to the delay is the propagation delay between the base station and base station controller, where Layer 3 messages are commonly processed. There is therefore a need in the art for systems and methods that perform scheduling of data transmissions without incurring the delays experienced in the prior art.
Embodiments of the invention which are disclosed herein address one or more of the needs indicated above by performing at least a portion of the data transmission scheduling at the base station rather than the base station controller.
In one embodiment, a wireless communication system having a base station and one or more mobile stations provides, between the base station and each mobile station, a forward link for communicating information from the base station to the mobile station, and a reverse link for communicating information from the mobile station to the base station. The system is configured to allocate reverse link resources using a request-grant mechanism. According to this mechanism, the mobile station accumulates data in one or more buffers. Each buffer stores data for a particular class of service. When the amount of data in one of the buffers reaches a threshold, the mobile station generates a request message and transmits this message to the base station. The base station receives the request message, as well as request messages from other mobile stations, and processes the requests to determine an allocation of the available reverse link resources. Based on this allocation, the base station may transmit one or more grant messages to the mobile stations, granting the mobile stations permission to transmit data for specified classes of service. The mobile stations then transmit their data to the base station as authorized by the grant messages. If a mobile station did not receive a grant to transmit data, the mobile station may transmit the data autonomously at a predetermined rate, which is typically lower than the rates at which transmission under a grant can proceed.
One embodiment of the invention comprises a base station having a transceiver subsystem and a processing subsystem, where the processing subsystem is configured to receive a request for service from a mobile station and to make a determination whether or not to issue a grant to transmit data (a “grant”) to the mobile station in response to the request for grant. The processing of the request occurs in the base station at the medium access control layer. The base station may issue an individual grant or a common grant responsive to the request. Alternatively, no grant may be issued at all. The request identifies a particular class of service. The grant can specify the granted traffic to pilot ratio for multiple classes of service if it is a common grant, but not if the grant is an individual grant.
One embodiment of the invention comprises a mobile station having a transceiver subsystem and a processing subsystem coupled to the transceiver subsystem, where the processing subsystem is configured to process information received from the transceiver subsystem and to generate information to be transmitted by the transceiver subsystem. In particular, the processing subsystem is configured to generate a request for transmission to a base station, to identify a corresponding grant received from the base station, and to control the transceiver subsystem to transmit data according to the received grant. The request specifies one of a set of available classes of service. A grant may also specify a particular class of service (a common grant specifies a class of service, but an individual grant does not). When a grant is received, the mobile station transmits data corresponding to the traffic to pilot ratio identified by the grant.
One embodiment of the invention is a wireless communication system having a base station and one or more mobile stations configured to communicate with the base station via corresponding wireless communication links. Each mobile station is configured to transmit requests for grants to the base station. The base station is configured to receive requests from the mobile stations, to process the requests independently of a base station controller, to allocate communication link resources among the mobile stations, and, if necessary, to transmit one or more grants to the mobile stations in accordance with the allocation of communication link resources. Each mobile station is configured to transmit data to the base station in accordance with any grants received from the base station.
One embodiment of the invention comprises a method which includes the steps of receiving a request for a grant at a base station, processing the request at the base station and determining at the base station whether to issue the grant. The processing of the request occurs in the base station at the medium access control layer. The base station may issue an individual grant or a common grant responsive to the request. Alternatively, no grant may be issued at all.
One embodiment of the invention comprises a method which includes the steps of transmitting a request for a grant from a mobile station, wherein the request specifies one of a set of available classes of service, if a grant corresponding to the request is issued, transmitting data according to the received grant, and if no grant corresponding to the request is issued, transmitting data in an autonomous mode or transmitting a subsequent request, or both.
Numerous additional embodiments are also possible.
Various aspects and features of the invention are disclosed by the following detailed description and the references to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
While the invention is subject to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and the accompanying detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description are not intended to limit the invention to the particular embodiments which are described.
One or more embodiments of the invention are described below. It should be noted that these and any other embodiments described below are exemplary and are intended to be illustrative of the invention rather than limiting.
As described herein, various embodiments of the invention comprise systems and methods for scheduling data transmissions in a wireless communication system using scheduling requests and grants.
In one embodiment, a wireless communication system having a base station and one or more mobile stations provides, between the base station and each mobile station, a forward link for communicating information from the base station to the mobile station, and a reverse link for communicating information from the mobile station to the base station. The mobile station may communicate different types of information to the base station. For example, the mobile station may communicate voice, data or multimedia information to the base station. The mobile station may have different Quality of Service (QoS) requirements for each of these different types of information. For example, voice information must be transmitted in real time in order to avoid audible artifacts of delayed delivery of the information. Non-voice information, on the other hand, may require a higher overall data rate, but may be able to tolerate delays that would be unacceptable for voice information. Embodiments of the present invention therefore provide means to associate different QoS levels with different types of data so that the corresponding QoS requirements can be met.
In one embodiment, each mobile station may transmit data autonomously to the serving base station at a rate no higher than a predetermined rate, such as 19.2 kbps for the initial transmission (after a hybrid automatic repeat, the actual effective rate drops to about half this rate). If a higher transmission rate is needed, the mobile station transmits a request for a grant to the base station. The request identifies the mobile station, a class of service for the data to be transmitted, the amount of data that needs to be transmitted, and a maximum supportable traffic-to-pilot (T/P) ratio. The mobile station may transmit a separate request corresponding to each of a set of service classes. The base station receives the requests for grant from the mobile station and determines an allocation of resources for this and any requests that are received from other mobile stations served by the base station. Based on the allocation determined by the base station, the base station may transmit a grant responsive to each request to the corresponding mobile stations. If the base station determines that no resources are to be allocated to a particular mobile station given the available information about class of service no grant is transmitted. The grants specify the corresponding mobile stations, and maximum T/P ratios (for the corresponding class of service in case of a common grant). The mobile stations which receive these grants can then transmit their data according to the appropriate grant parameters.
One of the benefits provided by this system is that the base station does not simply forward the mobile stations' requests to a base station controller, as in the prior art, but instead processes the requests, makes resource allocation determinations, and transmits grants to the mobile stations according to the resource allocation. The base station thereby eliminates the delays that result from the need in prior art systems to transmit the mobile station requests from the base station to the base station controller and to return scheduling information from the base station controller to the base station. In one embodiment, the system may also realize benefits from making common grants to the mobile stations, as well as individual grants. The common grants may specify particular classes of service, and any mobile station may transmit data under a common grant, as long as the data is associated with the class of service identified in the common grant. Various other benefits may be provided as described in more detail below in relation to the preferred embodiments.
A preferred embodiment of the invention is implemented in a wireless communication system that conforms generally to a release of the cdma2000 specification. cdma2000 is a 3rd Generation (3G) wireless communication standard that is based on the IS-95 standard. The cdma2000 standard has evolved and continues to evolve to continually support new services in a standard 1.25 MHz carrier. The preferred embodiment of the invention is intended to be operable in systems utilizing Release D of the cdma2000 standard, but other embodiments may be implemented in other Releases of cdma2000 or in systems that conform to other standards (e.g., W-CDMA). The embodiments described herein should therefore be considered exemplary, rather than limiting.
Referring to
It should be noted that, for the purposes of this disclosure, identical items in the figures may be indicated by identical reference numerals followed by a lowercase letter, e.g., 120a, 120b, and so on. The items may be collectively referred to herein simply by the reference numeral.
Base station 110 is also coupled to a base station controller 130 via a network 160. base station controller 130 is connected to a number of additional base stations (not shown) through network 160, forming a wireless communication system. Base station 110 may also be connected to various other system components, such as data servers, a public switched telephone network, the Internet, and the like through network 160. While the base station controller conventionally controls the scheduling of transmissions for the base stations in the system, at least a portion of the scheduling responsibilities in the present system are moved to base station 110.
It should be noted that the mobile stations and system components in this figure are exemplary and other systems may comprise other combinations of devices and may have different topologies than the specific configuration depicted in
While, in practice, the specific designs of base station 110 and mobile stations 120 may vary significantly, each serves as a wireless transceiver for communicating over the forward and reverse links. Base station 110 and mobile stations 120 therefore have the same general structure. This structure is illustrated in
Referring to
Persons of skill in the art of the invention will appreciate that the structure depicted in
Considering the structure of
As indicated above, the communication link between the base station and the mobile station actually comprises various channels. Referring to
Mobile station 120 transmits data to base station 110 via a set of reverse link channels 320. Again, these channels typically include both traffic channels and control channels. Mobile station 120 may transmit control information back to the base station over such channels as a reverse access channel (R-ACH), an extended reverse access channel (R-EACH), a reverse request channel (R-REQCH), a reverse dedicated control channel (R-DCCH), a reverse common control channel (R-CCCH), or a reverse rate indicator channel (R-RICH). The mobile station may transmit data via channels such as a reverse packet data channel (R-PDCH).
In many instances, reverse link capacity is interference limited. Base stations allocate available reverse link communication resources to mobile stations for efficient utilization to maximize throughput in accordance with Quality of Service (QoS) requirements for the various mobile stations.
Maximizing the use of the reverse link communication resources involves several factors. One factor to consider is the mix of scheduled reverse link transmissions from the different mobile stations, each of which may be experiencing varying channel quality at any given time. To increase overall throughput (the aggregate data transmitted by all the mobile stations in the cell), it is desirable for the entire reverse link to be fully utilized whenever there is reverse link data to be sent. To fill the available capacity, some mobile stations may be granted access at the highest rate they can support. Additional mobile stations may be granted access until capacity is reached. In deciding which mobile stations to schedule, the base station may therefore consider the maximum rate each mobile station can support and the amount of data each mobile station has to transmit. A mobile station capable of higher throughput (considering both the data rate supportable by the mobile station and the amount of data the mobile station has to transmit) may be selected instead of an alternate mobile station that cannot currently support the higher throughput.
Another factor to be considered is the quality of service required by each mobile station. It may be permissible to delay access to a particular mobile station in hopes that the mobile station's channel (or more specifically its supportable throughput) will improve, instead selecting mobile station that can support higher throughput. It may be the case, however, that a sub-optimal mobile station may need to be granted access in order to allow the mobile station to meet minimum quality of service guarantees. Therefore, the data throughput that is actually scheduled may not be the absolute maximum, but may instead be optimized in light of channel conditions, available mobile station transmit power, quality of service requirements, and similar factors.
Various scheduling mechanisms may be used to allow a mobile station to transmit data on the reverse link. One class of reverse link transmissions involves the mobile station making a request to transmit on the reverse link. The base station makes a determination of whether resources are available to accommodate the request, and a grant can be made by the base station to allow the transmission. The grant be made specifically to an individual mobile station, or it may be a common grant to all of the mobile stations. A common grant is broadcast to all of the mobile stations, although it may not be decoded by all of the mobile stations. Alternatively, the mobile station may not have sufficient data or channel quality to justify a request, and may autonomously transmit data to the base station.
The base station allocates the capacity of the reverse link to one or more mobile stations. A mobile station that is granted access is allowed a maximum power level or data rate for the transmissions that will be made under the grant. In one embodiment, the reverse link capacity is allocated using a T/P ratio. Since the pilot signal of each mobile station is adaptively controlled by a power control, specifying the T/P ratio indicates the available power for use in transmitting data on the reverse link. A corresponding data rate can be determined from the T/P ratio.
Referring to
The mobile station may transmit multiple requests. In the particular situation depicted in
As noted above, the forward and reverse links between the mobile station and the base station include a number of channels. These channels may include ones that are intended to communicate specific types of control data and traffic. The channels may therefore include request channels, grant channels, traffic channels, acknowledgment channels, and the like. The specific channels may vary from one embodiment to another.
As noted above, the grants that are issued by the base station may be either individual grants, or common grants. In one embodiment, the base station receives requests from one or more of the mobile stations which it serves and performs some manner of processing on these requests in order to determine how the reverse link resources should be allocated. (Any of a variety of algorithms may be used in this determination, but these algorithms will not be described here, as they are not essential to the invention.) Based upon this processing, the base station may issue individual grants, common grants, or both. Alternatively, the base station may not issue any grants at all.
Each of the individual grants identifies a specific mobile station and a granted T/P ratio. Each common grant identifies granted T/P ratios for specific classes of service, but does not identify a particular mobile station. Any mobile station that has data in an identified class of service may transmit data under the common grant at the corresponding T/P ratio. As noted above, the base station may also determine that no grant at all should be issued with respect to certain mobile stations and/or classes of service. Thus, using this mechanism, the base station can give priority to higher classes of service, prevent transmission of data associated with selected classes, give priority to classes of service having more data to be transmitted, and so on.
It should be noted that, in this embodiment, the processing of the MAC layer messages received from the mobile stations is performed by the base station. This scheduling mechanism sharply contrasts with the prior art, in which the scheduling messages are Layer 3 messages that are normally processed by the base station controller. Thus, in a typical, conventional system, the base station does not make any scheduling decisions, but simply forwards information from the mobile stations to the base station controller so that the base station controller can make the scheduling decisions.
The processing of the MAC layer messages at the base station requires several changes from typical prior art systems. For instance, because the base station conventionally did not perform the scheduling/allocation of reverse link resources, base stations conventionally had no logic for receiving and processing the requests from the mobile stations. It is therefore necessary to provide this logic, which typically is not found in conventional base stations. This logic may be implemented in hardware or software. Another difference between the present system and a conventional system is the fact that, because the base station processes information at the MAC layer (Layer 2) instead of Layer 3, the mobile stations must send scheduling messages (requests) as Layer 2 messages, rather than Layer 3 messages.
The processing of mobile stations' reverse link requests at the base station is somewhat unusual because it has conventionally been thought that the presence of multiple base stations and mobile stations in the system necessitated the use of the base station controller for scheduling in order to coordinate between the base stations. In the present system, however, it has been determined that this coordination is not necessary. This is because the power at which each mobile station transmits data is controlled so that errors are minimized, but not at the expense of wasting energy. In particular, the mobile station is controlled to use just enough power to achieve a minimum acceptable error rate. Typically, therefore, only one base station (the serving base station) will receive and correctly decode data from the mobile station. As a result, it is unnecessary to coordinate with other base stations, which most likely will not receive valid data from the mobile station.
In one embodiment, the request-grant process is event-driven. As the mobile station receives or generates data for a particular class of service, the data is stored in a buffer corresponding to that class of service. When the mobile station accumulates enough data in one of the buffers, the request is triggered. The frequency of requests is controlled in this embodiment by a signaling variable that specifies the minimum interval between two requests. The request identifies the class of service and the amount of data in the buffer (as well as the mobile station and the maximum supportable T/P ratio). The request is received by the base station, which decides whether or not to issue a grant responsive to the request. If a grant is issued, the mobile station begins transmitting data under the grant. If no grant is issued, the mobile station may transmit autonomously (typically at a much lower rate than under a grant), or it may transmit another request to the base station.
In one embodiment, once a mobile station begins transmitting under a grant, it may continue transmitting as long as the base station does not stop the transmissions. More specifically, when a mobile station receives an individual grant, the grant is to transmit a single frame of data. When the frame is received by the base station, the base station transmits an acknowledgment (ACK) to the mobile station. The acknowledgment is either a positive acknowledgment or a negative acknowledgment. If the acknowledgment is positive, the mobile station transmits another frame of data to the base station. If the acknowledgment is negative, the mobile station does not transmit another frame of data, but may transmit another request if there is sufficient data in the corresponding buffer to justify the request.
If the mobile station is transmitting under a common grant instead of an individual grant, the mobile station may transmit data for a predetermined interval. This interval is specified by the common grant. If the mobile station still has sufficient data in the appropriate buffer, a new request is triggered and transmitted to the base station. Alternative embodiments may use an ACK-and-continue scheme, in which the transmission may continue as long as positive acknowledgements are received, as described above.
As indicated above, in an ACK-and-continue scheme, the mobile station may continue to transmit data under an individual grant as long as the mobile station continues to receive positive acknowledgments from the base station. In one embodiment, the mobile station is configured to provide feedback to the base station in regard to the transmission of the data frames subsequent to the first frame. This feedback may, for example, comprise updates to the maximum T/P ratio supportable by the mobile station. In one embodiment, the mechanism for providing this feedback could be similar to the mechanism used for power control, in that a very small number of bits could be periodically transmitted to the base station to indicate that the maximum supportable T/P ratio has increased or decreased. This feedback could be taken into account by the base station in determining whether to allow transmissions by the mobile station to continue or to terminate these transmissions. The base station could then send positive or negative acknowledgments, as appropriate.
Those of skill in the art would understand that information and signals may be represented using any of a variety of different technologies and techniques. For example, data, instructions, commands, information, signals, bits, symbols, and chips that may be referenced throughout the above description may be represented by voltages, currents, electromagnetic waves, magnetic fields or particles, optical fields or particles, or any combination thereof.
Those of skill would further appreciate that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented or performed with a general purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
One or more of the steps of the methods and/or algorithms described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be interchanged without departing from the scope of the invention. The steps of the disclosed methods and/or algorithms may be embodied in hardware, in software modules executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. Software modules may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a computer system. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a computer system.
The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
The present Application for Patent claims priority to Provisional Application No. 60/448,269 entitled “Reverse Link Data Communication” filed Feb. 18, 2003, and Provisional Application No. 60/470,225 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Quality of Service in IS-2000 Reverse Link” filed May 12, 2003, and assigned to the assignee hereof and hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2149518 | Frank, Sr. | Mar 1939 | A |
3470324 | Harmuth | Sep 1969 | A |
4768023 | Xie | Aug 1988 | A |
5280472 | Gilhousen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5394433 | Bantz et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5406585 | Rohani et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5463342 | Guard | Oct 1995 | A |
5483557 | Webb | Jan 1996 | A |
5535214 | Shiobara | Jul 1996 | A |
5544156 | Teder et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553062 | Schilling et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5581575 | Zehavi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592470 | Rudrapatna et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5627938 | Johnston | May 1997 | A |
5647366 | Weng | Jul 1997 | A |
5712869 | Lee et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5719852 | Schilling et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726978 | Frodigh et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732391 | Fiocca | Mar 1998 | A |
5745480 | Behtash et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752193 | Scholefield et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754537 | Jamal | May 1998 | A |
5764551 | McCorkle | Jun 1998 | A |
5774809 | Tuutijarvi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781861 | Kang et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5809059 | Souissi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815526 | Rice | Sep 1998 | A |
5857174 | Dugan | Jan 1999 | A |
5862451 | Grau et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864760 | Gilhousen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875214 | Urbaniak et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5903608 | Chun | May 1999 | A |
5914950 | Tiedemann, Jr. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923650 | Chen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5938749 | Rusu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956642 | Larsson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966377 | Murai | Oct 1999 | A |
5966670 | Keskitalo et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969751 | Lee | Oct 1999 | A |
5973642 | Li et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991271 | Jones et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991273 | Abu-Dayya | Nov 1999 | A |
6005876 | Cimini, Jr. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014373 | Schilling et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6046980 | Packer | Apr 2000 | A |
6049716 | Jung | Apr 2000 | A |
6052594 | Chuang et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061359 | Schilling et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064692 | Chow | May 2000 | A |
6085091 | Yoo et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088387 | Gelblum et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094459 | Kao et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108374 | Balachandran et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108384 | Okumura et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111911 | Sanderford, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115357 | Packer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128283 | Sabaa et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128349 | Chow | Oct 2000 | A |
6128882 | Jones | Oct 2000 | A |
6130882 | Levin | Oct 2000 | A |
6131016 | Greenstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134215 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134218 | Holden | Oct 2000 | A |
6141388 | Servais et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144654 | Ibanez-Meier et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6195552 | Jeong et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201576 | Raghunath et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201954 | Soliman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205129 | Esteves et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208699 | Chen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208858 | Antonio et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219374 | Kim et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222875 | Dahlman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222888 | Kao et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233455 | Ramakrishna et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6259746 | Levin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292515 | Kao et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298041 | Packer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307844 | Tsunehara et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335922 | Tiedemann, Jr. et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347080 | Jou et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6363255 | Kuwahara | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389056 | Kanterakis et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6414988 | Ling | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425105 | Piirainen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442130 | Jones, IV et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456653 | Sayeed | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6483816 | Tsunehara et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6490461 | Muller | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496496 | Ramakrishna et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505058 | Willey | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512925 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532363 | Pussinen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535723 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549561 | Crawford | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563885 | Magee et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570444 | Wright | May 2003 | B2 |
6571101 | Schulz | May 2003 | B1 |
6571104 | Nanda et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574205 | Sato | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6590879 | Huang et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597913 | Natarajan | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609007 | Eibling et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6654609 | Kim | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6680925 | Wu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6693892 | Rinne et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701151 | Diachina et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711208 | Razoumov et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6741862 | Chung et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744754 | Lee | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751264 | Ho et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751444 | Meiyappan | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757241 | Jones et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760303 | Brouwer | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775544 | Ficarra | Aug 2004 | B2 |
RE38603 | Kim et al. | Sep 2004 | E |
6816827 | Xia et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6836666 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6847826 | Wesby et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847828 | Miyoshi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6865389 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6880103 | Kim et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6898418 | Rauschmayer | May 2005 | B2 |
6904286 | Dantu | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917581 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6937582 | Kronestedt | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6952561 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6982946 | Wiberg et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6987798 | Ahn et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006429 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016651 | Narasimhan | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031741 | Lee et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7050406 | Hsu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054275 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7061986 | Tonissen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068702 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069038 | Hakkinen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072315 | Liu et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076001 | Beadle et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092706 | Yang | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099397 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103021 | Jou | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120134 | Tiedemann, Jr. et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126930 | Pankaj et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7155236 | Chen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7158504 | Kadaba et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164669 | Li et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177367 | Storm | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187646 | Schramm | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190964 | Damnjanovic et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197085 | Vella-Coleiro | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7215930 | Malladi | May 2007 | B2 |
7257101 | Petrus et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269186 | Abrol et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7269389 | Petrus et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272199 | Storm et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274743 | Kim | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277709 | Vadgama | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286558 | Kim et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286846 | Chen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289529 | Sherman | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7299402 | Soong et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7313167 | Yoon et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7317711 | Bae et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7327716 | Fong et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336640 | McDonough et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336954 | Wang et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7423992 | Iwamura | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7447258 | Pietila et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7447287 | Parantainen | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7463702 | Ammer et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7706403 | Hosein | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20010012271 | Berger | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020021683 | Holtzman et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021692 | Huh et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020051432 | Shin | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057730 | Karlsson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020093918 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111183 | Lundby | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020131522 | Felgentreff | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136271 | Hiramatsu et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020137521 | Kim et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150077 | Temerinac | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160767 | Hanly | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172192 | Hunzinger et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020172217 | Kadaba et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183039 | Padgett et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030028251 | Mathews | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031130 | Vanghi | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039317 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030081538 | Walton et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123392 | Ruutu et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030129981 | Kim | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137953 | Chae et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142656 | Padovani et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152102 | Morgan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030219037 | Toskala et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040013102 | Fong et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040101035 | Boer et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040160914 | Sarkar | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040160922 | Nanda et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040160933 | Odenwalder et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162083 | Chen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162098 | Wei et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040203973 | Khan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224711 | Panchal et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228283 | Naguib et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228349 | Vrzic et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228389 | Odenwalder | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050002324 | Sutivong et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004970 | Jain et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007986 | Malladi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050176456 | Chen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050254465 | Lundby et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060007892 | Sudo | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060019701 | Ji | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060128410 | Derryberry et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060165126 | Petersson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060183497 | Paranchych et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060215737 | Bang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060264220 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070111669 | Malladi | May 2007 | A1 |
20080043683 | Kwon et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080194286 | Chen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1166094 | Nov 1997 | CN |
1263675 | Aug 2000 | CN |
627827 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0783210 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0809364 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0921652 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0996304 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1104127 | May 2001 | EP |
1231807 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1257140 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1292057 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1326471 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2301687 | Dec 1996 | GB |
2352944 | Feb 2001 | GB |
6350562 | Dec 1994 | JP |
08298498 | Dec 1996 | JP |
10013325 | Jan 1998 | JP |
11098120 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11154919 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11196043 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11508417 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000299680 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000513549 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000349740 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001016139 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001036500 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001238269 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001515300 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001517017 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002026808 | Jan 2002 | JP |
200277984 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002508137 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002508896 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002159061 | May 2002 | JP |
2002522988 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002232943 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002528954 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002531992 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002534020 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003008521 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003018117 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003032218 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003060606 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003060609 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003069523 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004032518 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004166038 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004214746 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004320679 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005505168 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005505955 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2008072733 | Mar 2008 | JP |
19960015862 | Nov 1996 | KR |
100214293 | May 1999 | KR |
2001056478 | Jul 2001 | KR |
20020076991 | Oct 2002 | KR |
20020085674 | Nov 2002 | KR |
20020089164 | Nov 2002 | KR |
100406531 | Nov 2003 | KR |
2073913 | Feb 1997 | RU |
2111619 | May 1998 | RU |
2115246 | Jul 1998 | RU |
2120198 | Oct 1998 | RU |
2149518 | May 2000 | RU |
2183910 | Jun 2002 | RU |
2189696 | Sep 2002 | RU |
WO9205556 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO9507578 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO9510144 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO9512297 | May 1995 | WO |
WO9701256 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO9733399 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO9835525 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9836606 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9845966 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO9901994 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO9904525 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO9907089 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO9912282 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO9929054 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO0008869 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO0038444 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0042752 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO0048328 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0065743 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO0072622 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO0106714 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO0110159 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0117158 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0124568 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0128194 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0141318 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0199303 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO0199312 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO0201762 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO0231991 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0233838 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0237693 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0241531 | May 2002 | WO |
WO02063818 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02065664 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02080400 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02095960 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO03084163 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO2005015942 | Feb 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050003843 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60448269 | Feb 2003 | US | |
60470225 | May 2003 | US |