The invention relates to a system and method for facilitating digital content movement based on a delivery specification and more particularly to a system and method for facilitating digital content movement by making available the delivery specification for determining whether the digital content complies with the delivery specification.
Generally speaking, electronic file transfer can occur over public or private networks using a variety of techniques including peer-to-peer file sharing and client server file transfer. The ability to use the content of electronic files transferred may be more problematic. Particularly, the useful exchange of electronic files containing digital media content, such as movies, music, videos, and so forth, may require the transfer of files in specific formats with specific characteristics. For example, a conventional system may not be able to use digital media content that does not include specific files types or contain media encoded at rates outside of system specifications. As a result, various solutions have emerged to tailor the receipt of digital media content based on the file characteristics.
Conventional systems, however, typically deal only with transferring digital media content over a network and not managing and applying rules about what can be transferred. This results in inefficient use of network resources and impedes straight through processing with no human intervention.
Conventional systems for exchanging digital media content suffer from these and other problems.
The invention solving these and other drawbacks of conventional systems relates to a system and method for facilitating the communication of a delivery specification relating to transferring digital content (as used herein, “digital content” is used interchangeably with “media file,” which can include streamed digital content as well as digital content transmitted as a discreet file).
In some implementations, a plurality of users may register with a content distribution system in order to interact with the system such as by sending and/or receiving a delivery specification and/or digital media content. In some implementations, unregistered users may interact with the system. In some of implementations, the system may record or otherwise register the unregistered user with the system after the unregistered user interacts with the system. For example, the system may register an unregistered user after the unregistered user accesses a delivery specification.
In some implementations, upon receipt of the delivery specification, the system may publish or otherwise make available the delivery specification to registered and/or unregistered users. In some implementations, the system may make available the delivery specification via various channels such as, for example, via a webpage, a web portal, an agent (such as a software and/or hardware module) executing on a client device that communicates with the system that stores the delivery specifications, electronic mail and/or other communication channel that can be used to make the delivery specification available to a user.
In some implementations, a delivery specification may include one or more requirements that specify attributes of the media file. A requirement in the delivery specification may include an attribute that the media file has in order to comply with the requirement. For example, a requirement may relate to the file specification, the content specification, the media track specification, video track format requirements, audio track format requirements, and/or data track format requirements, among others.
In some implementations, a delivery specification may include one or more requirements relating to the file specification, such as the acceptable type(s) of files (e.g. XML, MXF, WMV, MOV, etc.), a maximum and/or minimum size of the file, and/or content specification requirements. The content specification requirements may include an XMLSchema and/or a set of media track specifications that include minimum and maximum occurrences for each media track specified. The media track specifications may include video track specification, audio track specifications, and data track specifications. The video track specifications may include requirements relating to attributes such as display width, display height, frame rate, aspect ratio, codec, bit rate, and bit rate mode, among others. The audio track specifications may include requirements relating to attributes such as sampling rate, audio encoding, and bit rate, among others. The data track specifications may include requirements relating to attributes such as captioning format and ANC data, among others. In some implementations, each requirement in the delivery specification is fulfilled by the media file to show compliance with the delivery specification.
In some implementations, the delivery specification may include one or more requirements related to a package, which may include more than one discreet file. For example, a requirement of a media file may specify that more than one discreet file should be received such as a metadata file that describes a discreet media file along with the discreet media file itself. In some implementations, the requirement may relate to the metadata and/or the discreet media file.
By receiving, storing, and/or making available the delivery specification from and to various users, the system facilitates determinations of whether a media file of one user complies with the requirements of a delivery specification of another user. In this manner, a flexible architecture may be achieved in which a media file may be validated against a delivery specification at one or more of a plurality of locations such as at a device of a user receiving the media file, at a device of a user sending the media file, and/or at a device of the system that stores and makes available the delivery specification.
The system may receive a delivery specification from a first user and receive a request from a second user for the media delivery specification. The system may communicate the delivery specification to the second user based on the user request. In this example, the second user may determine whether one of its media files complies with the requirements of the media delivery request. If so, the second registered user may directly or indirectly communicate the complying media file to the first user.
In some implementations, a second user may access the delivery specification at the system and may communicate to the system information relating to one or more of its media files to the system. In this example, the system may determine whether the media file of the second user complies with the requirements of the delivery specification based on the information it receives from the second user. In this case, the system may then send a confirmation or denial to the second user depending on whether the received information indicates compliance of the media file with the delivery specification. If the second registered user receives confirmation that the media file complies with the delivery specification, the second registered user may send the media file to the first registered user.
In some implementations, the first user may receive a media file that may or may not have been validated against the delivery specification. In some implementations, the first user may determine whether the media file complies with the delivery specification. If the media file does not comply, the first user may reject and/or discard the media file. If the media file does comply, the first registered user may accept the media file for use and/or storage.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art based on the following drawings and detailed description.
A system and method for facilitating communication of delivery specifications that includes one or more requirements of a media file may be provided.
A user may comprise a person, an organization, a company or corporation, and/or any other entity or individual who accesses the system. A registered user may include a user that has registered with the system such as by providing identifying and/or other information about the user. An unregistered user may include a user that is not a registered user. A user (whether registered or not) may use any device (such as, for example, receiving device 200 and/or sending device 300) that is capable of communicating with the system to access the system. In some implementations, a registered user may identify itself via the device in order for the device to access the system. For example, a registered user may communicate a username and password from their device via a web-based or other channel in order to be identified by the system. Other methods of identification using devices may also be used (e.g., authentication, encrypted communications, the use of cookies on the device, and so forth).
As shown in
In some implementations, a delivery specification 110a may specify requirements for a package, which may include more than one discreet file required by the delivery specification 110a that are related to one another. For example, a delivery specification 110 may specify requirements for an XML file that contains metadata, a video file that contains a video clip of a specified length, and an audio file that may be related to the video file. Included in this example delivery specification may also be requirements relating to one or more of the file specification, the content specification, the media track specification, video track format requirements, audio track format requirements, and/or data track format requirements, among others, for one or more of the XML file, the video file, and the audio file.
The delivery specification repository 110 may store the delivery specifications 110a-n. In some implementations, the delivery specification repository 110 may also store profile information for registered users of the system 10. The profile information may include at least a user identifier for the registered user, contact information for the user (i.e., first and last name, email address, authentication information, etc.), and/or other relevant data.
In some implementations, the profile information may store the prior activity of users. For example, the profile information may include a number of times that a user has received media via the system and/or the number of times that the user has stored a delivery specification for a media request in the delivery specification repository 110 (and the associated delivery specification or media request identifier(s)). In another example, the profile information may also include the number of times that the user has accessed a delivery specification (and the associated delivery specification or media request identifier(s)). The profile information may also include the number of times that the user has submitted or attempted to submit media in response to accessing a delivery specification (and the associated delivery specification or media request identifier(s)).
In some implementations, the delivery specification repository 110 is searchable. For example, the entries in the repository 110 (i.e., the delivery specifications 110a-n) may be searchable by keyword, media category or type, features specified in the delivery specification such as requested media file size or requested media file type, and/or by other information related to the delivery specification or the intended receiver of the media file associated with the delivery specification. In some implementations, the registered users may receive notifications when a delivery specification is newly stored and/or otherwise received at the delivery specification repository 110. In some implementations, registered users may subscribe to receive notifications of when delivery specifications associated with one or more other registered users are newly stored and/or otherwise received at the delivery specification repository 110.
In some implementations, the delivery specification repository 110 (and the delivery specifications 110a-n) are made publicly available for access and/or download via various communication channels such as, for example, via a webpage, a web portal, an agent (such as a software and/or hardware module) executing on a client device that communicates with the system that stores the hardware specifications, electronic mail and/or other communication channel that can be used to make the delivery specification available to a user.
In some implementations, only registered users may provide a delivery specification 110a to the delivery specification repository 110. In other implementations, users that are not registered may provide a delivery specification 110a to the delivery specification repository 110.
As shown in
In some implementations, a media validator 120 may access or receive a delivery specification and determine whether a media file complies with the requirements of the delivery specification. The media validator 120 may receive information that describes a media file and determine whether the information indicates that the media file complies with the requirements set forth in the delivery specification. In some implementations, media validator 120 analyzes the media file or information related to the media file and determines whether the media file complies with the requirements of the delivery specification. For example, the media validator 120 may extract or otherwise receive a header from the media file, determine metadata regarding the media file, determine information from the media file, and/or parse the media file. In some implementations, the media validator 120 may be implemented on one or more system components. For example, as illustrated in
In some implementations, receiving device 200 may include a device used by a user to interact with the system in various ways. For example, via receiving device 200, a user may upload or otherwise specify requirements of a delivery specification 110, receive a media file, validate the media file based on the delivery specification, and/or perform other operations related to transferring media files. In some implementations, the receiving device 200 may be used to authenticate to the system 10 by sharing secrets with the system 10. In some implementations, the receiving device 200 receives media based on a delivery specification stored in the delivery specification repository 110.
In some implementations, the receiving device 200 may be used to provide the delivery specification 110 to the specification delivery device 100. In some implementations, the receiving device 200 may receive a media file based on the delivery specification, which may be stored in the delivery specification repository 110. In some implementations, the received media file is already validated by another device such as by sending device 300 and/or by specification delivery device 100. In some implementations, the received media file is not validated. Whether the received media file is already validated or not, in some implementations, the receiving device 200 may validate the media file based on the delivery specification.
In some implementations, the receiving device 200 may include an agent (such as a software and/or hardware module) that facilitates the communication and/or validation of a media file as described herein. For example, the agent may facilitate communication with specification delivery device 100 and/or with a counterpart agent executing at sending device 300.
In some implementations, receiving device 200 may be used to specify different delivery specifications for different types of content. For example, a delivery specification may be used for high-definition content while another delivery specification may be used for standard-definition content. In another example, a delivery specification may be used for one type of programming while another delivery specification may be used for another type of programming. Other examples using different delivery specifications for different types may be used.
In some implementations, the receiving device 200 may be associated (e.g., used by) a media delivery service such as a television channel or network. The media file to be delivered to the receiving device 200 may include content such as video, audio, text, and/or other content to be displayed on the channel or network. The delivery specification may include requirements for the media file to be displayed. For example, the delivery specification may specify requirements high-definition or standard-definition format. In this example, the receiving device 200 may have a first delivery specification for a first media file in standard-definition format and a second delivery specification for a second media file in high-definition format.
In some implementations, the media file may be related to or include various content such as, for example, an advertisement, a public service announcement, television programming, and/or other types of content that may be communicated via a media file.
In an example implementation as shown in
If the sending device 300 receives confirmation that the media file complies with the requirements set forth in the delivery specification 110a, the sending device 300 may facilitate communication of the media file to the registered user (or a device of the registered user) associated with the delivery specification 110a (in this case, the receiving device 200). For example, the sending device 300 may send the media file to the receiving device 200.
In the example implementation shown in
If the media validator 310 finds that the media file complies with the requirements set forth in the delivery specification 110a, the sending device 300 may facilitate communication of the media file to the registered user (or device of the registered user) associated with the delivery specification 110a (in this case, the first registered user 100). For example, the sending device 300 may send the media file to the receiving device 200.
In some implementations, the sending device 300 may have the media validator 310 analyze one or more media files to determine whether a media file complies with the requirements of the delivery specification. In some implementations, the media validator 310 may continue to analyze media files until the media validator 310 determines that a media file complies with the requirements of the delivery specification or no more media files are available or accessible to analyze. In some implementations, the media validator 310 may analyze at least a specified number of media files.
In the example implementation shown in
In an operation 402, users are registered in the system 10. In some implementations, users are registered with the system 10 and profile information for the registered users is stored at the network, for example, at the repository 110 or at a separate database or computing device of the network. In some implementations, profiles may be created for respective users as they are registered in the system 10.
In operation 404, a delivery specification 110a for a media file to be delivered to a receiving device 200 is stored at the repository 110. In some implementations, when a delivery specification 110a is stored at the repository 110, the system 10 may publish the delivery specification 110a to users such as by making the delivery specification 110a available via a web-based portal to registered and non-registered users, and/or otherwise make available the delivery specification 110a.
In an operation 406, the specification delivery device 100 and/or the delivery specification repository 110 may store the delivery specification. The specification delivery device 100 and/or the delivery specification repository 110 may also identify a sending device 300 to access the delivery specification 110a. For example, the specification delivery device 100 and/or the delivery specification repository 110 may identify the sending device 300 by receiving a request (e.g., a request for a webpage or other type of request) from the sending device 300 to access the delivery specification 110a. In another example, the specification delivery device 100 and/or the delivery specification repository 110 may identify the sending device 300 by receiving, at the receiving device 200, a media file from the sending device 300. In another example, the specification delivery device 100 and/or the delivery specification repository 110 may identify the sending device 300 by receiving, from the sending device 300, a request to receive the delivery specification 110a. Other methods of identifying the sending device 300 also exist.
In an operation 408, the specification delivery device 100 and/or the delivery specification repository 110 facilitate access to the delivery specification 110a to the sending device 300. The sending device 300 may access the delivery specification 110a to provide a media file for validation using the delivery specification 110a for the receiving device 200. In some implementations, the media validator 210 may reside at the receiving device 200. In some implementations, the media validator 120, 310, may reside at the specification delivery device 100 or the sending device 300 respectively.
In some implementations, the delivery specification may indicate at which device (the specification delivery device 100, the receiving device 200, or the sending device 300) validation may occur. In some implementations, the delivery specification may indicate whether the receiving device 200 is willing to accept media files that have not been validated as complying with the requirements of the delivery specification. In these implementations, the specification delivery device 100 and the sending device 300 may communicate and determine which of the devices (a media validator 120 at the network or a media validator 310 at the sending device 300) may validate the media file. In some implementations, the profile information of a registered device associated with the delivery specification 110a may indicate where validation of media files may occur.
In an implementation in which the media validator resides at the specification delivery device 100 such as that illustrated in
In an implementation in which the media validator 310 resides at the sending device 300 as illustrated in
In another implementation in which the media validator 120 resides at the specification delivery device 100 such as that illustrated in
In some implementations, the specification delivery device 100 and/or the delivery specification repository 110 may facilitate access to the delivery specification for the receiving device 200 (in cases where the receiving device 200 does not already have the delivery specification), and the media validator 210 may reside at the receiving device 200. In these implementations, as illustrated in
In some implementations, in operation 700, specification delivery device 100 may receive a delivery specification from receiving device 200, which may use specification delivery device 100 to publish the delivery specification.
In operation 702, the specification delivery device 100 stores and/or publishes the delivery specification 110a. For example, the delivery specification 110a may be stored at the delivery specification repository 110, may be published to one or more users of the system 10. In some implementations, the delivery specification repository 110 and/or the specification delivery device 100 may receive a request from the sending device 300 for the delivery specification 110a in operation 704. The request may include, for example a URL request for a web page or web portal, or other request for the delivery specification.
In operation 706, the specification delivery device 100 may communicate the delivery specification to the sending device 300. For example, the specification delivery device 100 may communicate the delivery specification via a webpage, portal, agent operating on sending device 300, and/or other interface. As would be appreciated, communicating the delivery specification to sending device 300 can include but does not require that the sending device 300 download the delivery specification to a persistent memory.
In operation 708, specification delivery device 100 receives information from the sending device 300. In some examples, the information may include a media file, a header extracted from the media file, metadata relating to the media file, and/or other information that can be used to validate the media file. In operation 710, the media validator 120 residing at the specification delivery device 100 determines whether the media file from the sending device 300 complies with the requirements of the delivery specification 110a by analyzing the information received (e.g. the media file, the extracted header, the metadata, and/or other information). In operation 712, the media validator 120 may send an indication to the sending device 300 regarding its determination. In operation 718, the specification delivery device facilitates communication of the media file to the receiving device 200. For example, if the media validator 120 has sent a signal indicating that the media file of the sending device 300 complies with the requirements set forth in the delivery specification 110a, the sending device 300 facilitates communication of the media file to the receiving device 200 via a web page, a web portal, an agent operating on the sending device 300 and/or the receiving device 200, one or more third party computers, and/or other method of communicating data. In some implementations, if the information analyzed by the media validator 120 includes the media file from the sending device 300, the specification delivery device 100 may facilitate communication of the media file to the receiving device 200 in operation 714.
In some implementations, in operation 700, a delivery specification 110a for a media file to be delivered to the receiving device 200 is received at the delivery specification repository 110 and/or the specification delivery device 100. The delivery specification 110a may be received from the receiving device 200, the sending device 300, a device of another registered user, or a device of a non-registered user.
In operation 720, the receiving device 200, via media validator 210, may determine whether the media file received from the sending device 300 complies with the requirements of the delivery specification.
The specification delivery device 100 may be any computing device such as, for example, a server, a desktop computer, laptop computer, personal digital assistant, smart phone, and/or any other computing device. Other configurations and system architectures may be used. For example, although not shown, specification delivery device 100 may be or include one or more servers connected to one or more clients via a network 20 such as a Wide Area Network, Local Area Network, the Internet, a cloud-based network and/or other network or combination thereof. The specification delivery device 100 may be capable of communicating with network 20, delivery specification repository 110 and one or more other registered user devices, such as receiving device 200 and sending device 300.
The receiving device 200 may be any computing device such as, for example, a server, a desktop computer, laptop computer, personal digital assistant, smart phone, and/or any other computing device. The receiving device 200 may be capable of communicating with network 20, specification delivery device 100, the delivery specification repository 110, and one or more other registered user devices, such as sending device 300.
In some implementations, the receiving device 200 communicates with second registered user device without the use of intermediary user devices or clients (i.e. directly through a network). In some implementations, receiving device 200 communicates with sending device 300 via the use of an intermediary (e.g. via the specification delivery device 100). In some implementations, receiving device 200 communicates with sending device 300 via the network 20. In some implementations, the receiving device 200 is able to communicate with sending device 300 over the Internet and/or without communicating via network 20 or a part of network 20.
The sending device 300 may be any computing device such as, for example, a server, a desktop computer, laptop computer, personal digital assistant, smart phone, and/or any other computing device. The sending device 300 may be capable of communicating with network 20, specification delivery device 100, the delivery specification repository 110, and one or more other registered user devices, such as receiving device 200.
The delivery specification repository 110 may be at least one database that stores system data such as profile information for the registered users, delivery specifications associated with one or more registered users, or any other data. The delivery specification repository 110 may be associated and communicate with the specification delivery device 100.
The one or more databases comprising the delivery specification repository 110 may be, include, or interface to, for example, an Oracle™ relational database sold commercially by Oracle Corporation. Other databases, such as Informix™, DB2 (Database 2) or other data storage, including file-based, object, or query formats, platforms, or resources such as OLAP (On Line Analytical Processing), SQL (Standard Query Language), NoSQL, a SAN (storage area network), Microsoft Access™ or other form of database may also be used, incorporated, or accessed. The database may comprise one or more such databases that reside in one or more physical devices and in one or more physical locations. The database may store a plurality of types of data and/or files and associated data or file descriptions, administrative information, or any other data.
In some implementations, the delivery specification repository 110 may be part of or hosted by a computing device on the network 20. In some implementations, the delivery specification repository 110 may be part of or hosted by the specification delivery device 100. In some implementations, the delivery specification repository 110 may be physically separate from the computing device but may be operably communicable therewith.
In some implementations, the media validator 120 may be part of or hosted by a computing device associated with the delivery specification repository 110. In some implementations, the media validator 120 may be physically separate from the computing device but may be operably communicable therewith. In some implementations, the media validator 120 may reside at a separate computing device, such as, for example a receiving device 200 or a sending device 300.
In addition, implementations of the invention may be made in hardware, firmware, software, or any suitable combination thereof. Aspects of the invention may also be implemented as instructions stored on a machine-readable medium, which may be read and executed by one or more processors. A machine-readable medium may include any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computing device). For example, a tangible computer readable storage medium may include read only memory, random access memory, magnetic disk storage media, optical storage media, flash memory devices, and others, and a machine-readable transmission media may include forms of propagated signals, such as carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, and others. Further, firmware, software, routines, or instructions may be described herein in terms of specific exemplary aspects and implementations of the invention, and performing certain actions. However, it will be apparent that such descriptions are merely for convenience and that such actions in fact result from computing devices, processors, controllers, or other devices executing the firmware, software, routines, or instructions.
Aspects and implementations described herein as including a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every aspect or implementation may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an aspect or implementation, it will be understood that such feature, structure, or characteristic may be included in connection with other aspects or implementations, whether or not explicitly described. Thus, various changes and modifications may be made to the provided description without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. As such, the specification and drawings should be regarded as exemplary only, and the scope of the invention to be determined solely by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5319644 | Liang | Jun 1994 | A |
5519863 | Allen et al. | May 1996 | A |
5552776 | Wade et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5737495 | Adams et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5796966 | Simcoe et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5999979 | Vellanki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006019 | Takei | Dec 1999 | A |
6064656 | Angal et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085251 | Fabozzi, II | Jul 2000 | A |
6128653 | del Val et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6163543 | Chin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163809 | Buckley | Dec 2000 | A |
6192412 | Cantoral et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199109 | Reder et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219706 | Fan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6298061 | Chin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6396511 | Karino | May 2002 | B1 |
6405256 | Lin et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438598 | Pedersen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463465 | Nieuwejaar | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6557122 | Sugauchi et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6600812 | Gentillin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6701437 | Hoke et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718361 | Basani et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6742023 | Fanning et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6760861 | Fukuhara et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6763384 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6823373 | Pancha et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6859835 | Hipp | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6925495 | Hegde et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6976095 | Wolrich et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6996631 | Aiken, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7051365 | Bellovin | May 2006 | B1 |
7054935 | Farber et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7103889 | Hiltgen | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113963 | McCaw | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7139805 | Seagren et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139811 | Lev Ran et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7152105 | McClure et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152108 | Khan et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7177897 | Manukyan | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7257630 | Cole et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7308710 | Yarborough | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7343301 | Nash et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7403934 | Polizzi | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406533 | Li et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7447775 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7461067 | Dewing et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7478146 | Tervo et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7526557 | Bowler | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7552192 | Carmichael | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7606562 | Aaltonen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7676675 | Billharz et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7707271 | Rudkin et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716312 | Gamble | May 2010 | B2 |
7913280 | Roberts | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8081956 | Aaltonen et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8667145 | Bowler | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8930475 | North | Jan 2015 | B1 |
20020032769 | Barkai et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049834 | Molnar | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020077909 | Kanojia et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099729 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104008 | Cochran et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116485 | Black et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116616 | Mi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165961 | Everdell et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169694 | Stone et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020199000 | Banerjee | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014482 | Toyota et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028495 | Pallante | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028647 | Grosu | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046103 | Amato et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051026 | Carter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056096 | Albert et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065950 | Yarborough | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088694 | Patek et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105830 | Pham et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115302 | Teraoaka et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115361 | Kirk et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120822 | Langrind et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126195 | Reynolds et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030212806 | Mowers et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216958 | Register et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030221014 | Kosiba et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040003152 | Fussell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015728 | Cole et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040049550 | Yu | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073681 | Fald | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093420 | Gamble | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117829 | Karaoguz | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122888 | Carmichael | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040139212 | Mukherjee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040254914 | Polizzi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050044250 | Gay et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050086359 | Banerjee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086533 | Hsieh | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050251575 | Bayardo et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261796 | Shen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060015580 | Gabriel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070073727 | Klein et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070130143 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070185902 | Messinger et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080016205 | Svendsen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080250028 | Rutherglen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080319760 | Da Palma et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090037520 | Loffredo | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090077220 | Svendsen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083117 | Svendsen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083362 | Svendsen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090138477 | Piira et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164283 | Coley | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100122180 | Kamiyama et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100205261 | Michel | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100293147 | Snow et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110009991 | Dinicola et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022642 | deMilo et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110225270 | Taniguchi et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20140032503 | Nash | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2006019490 | Feb 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Waldrop, Clarence, et al., “Making a TCP/IP Connection Through a Firewall”, Candle Advanced Technical Corner Tips and Tricks, copyright 2003, 7 pages. |
Premo, Rita, “A Picture-Perfect Travel Log; Working Wise; Avaya Inc.; Brief Article”, Aug. 1, 2002, Security Management, No. 8, vol. 46, p. 25, ISSN: 0145-9406, pp. 1-3. |
“ISOCOR Releases Industry's Most Powerful Message Server”, Nov. 14, 1994, M2 Presswire, pp. 1-3. |
“SmartFTP—What is FXP?”, printed from http://www.smartflip.com/support/kb/what-is-fxp-f14.html, May 16, 2007, 1 page. |
“Direct Client-to-Client”—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, printed from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Direct—Clienet-to-Client&oldid=344943093, Feb. 19, 2010, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140032503 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |