Patent Grant
9145815
The present disclosure relates to sensing particulate matter, and in an embodiment, but not by way of limitation, to a system and method for determining when particulate matter levels are outside a control limit (for a diesel particulate filter).
Diesel particulate filters (DPF) are required on many modern diesel powered vehicles. During the trapping mode of operation, increasing soot loading in the DPF creates back pressure on the engine, thereby degrading fuel economy and engine performance with a potential of engine damage. High temperatures during regeneration can lead to DPF failures, such as cracking, resulting in leakage of particulates. Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) are required by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to certify with on-board diagnostics (OBD) that their diesel emissions control system is functioning normally and the emissions of particulate matter (PM) are below a certification limit (0.01 g/hp-hr), and to detect loss of performance before the actual emissions of PM exceed the threshold (0.05 g/hp-hr) (for all engine families starting in 2013, and for one engine family starting 2010). Today, the best available solution is to monitor the engine operation and the pressure drop across the DPF as well as the DPF regeneration control system with software within the engine control unit to detect loading of the DPF as well as problems with the equipment. However, the current best approach does not directly or accurately measure DPF loading or performance and thus cannot insure compliance.
An installation of a particulate matter (PM) sensor directly in a diesel exhaust stream after a diesel particulate filter (DPF) can be an effective means of insuring compliance with emission standards. A problem however is to detect the PM levels and identify a single operating condition as belonging to a distribution below an on board diagnosed (OBD) threshold from those operating conditions which rightly belong to the distribution above the OBD threshold. Examples of such distributions below a threshold 250, approaching the threshold 250, and exceeding the threshold 250 are illustrated respectively at 210, 220, and 230 in
Specifically,
An embodiment uses a charged-based PM sensor (cbPM) to detect an engine and/or after-treatment system failure. In this embodiment, a minimum condition for detecting DPF failure is the detection of a PM level in excess of an OBD threshold of 0.05 g/bh-hr. This embodiment is related to the signal conditioning and processing of the cbPMs that are installed post-DPF location. This embodiment includes an algorithm and electronic signal conditioning unit that continuously monitor the PM sensor signal. The PM sensor and its algorithm have the ability to distinguish between a compliant and non-compliant distribution, as shown in
Non-compliance is detected by discrimination at the end of a sampling interval to determine if the operating condition for that sampling interval is consistent with a running historical averaged distribution's Upper Control Limit or UCL (defined by a mean, standard deviation, and an upper control limit which is a number of standard deviations above the mean). Once an operating condition is found to be above the running distribution UCL, it is flagged, even if it is below the threshold itself, and the number of flagged operating conditions is logged. If the number of flagged conditions increases suddenly over a period of time, the sensor will indicate deterioration of the DPF. Similarly, if the running value for the upper control limit of the running distribution, wherein as stated above the UCL is equal to the mean plus a number of standard deviations, is moving upward over time, this is flagged as deterioration of the DPF. Additionally, if the running value for the upper control limit of the running distribution is above the OBD threshold, the sensor sends a flag that it has lost the ability to distinguish an operating condition which belongs to the normal running distribution from one that is a true OBD excursion. If however, the UCL of the running distribution is below the threshold and an operating condition registers above the threshold, this condition is considered an OBD excursion and the event is communicated to an engine control unit (ECU). The system also has a reset button which zero's out the memory buffer and the logging of normal operation, and restarts the system from zero.
One or more embodiments include an algorithm, an approach, a statistical method (to compute mean, standard deviation, and UCL), an on-board memory, input and output channels, and a central processing unit (CPU) that is programmed to make decisions regarding greater than and less than the UCL, and is programmed with an ability to communicate with the engine control unit (ECU). This embodiment covers all of these elements together as well as subsets of them that serve the same purpose—the elimination of one element of the processing chain that does not invalidate the overall approach—that is, to monitor, store, determine a distribution, and determine a UCL as indicated above.
Referring specifically to
At 735, the upper control limit for the amount of particulates is defined by one or more characteristics of the particulate matter sensor. Examples of such characteristics include whether mass concentration or number concentration is measured by the sensor, the sensor response time and/or integration time, the detection of other exhaust particle parameters (e.g., whether the particle is just carbon or whether there are hydrocarbons in the distribution), whether the density of the particles has been estimated or measured, and the drift of the sensor itself with time. At 740, the upper control limit for the amount of particulates is a function of a mean of the amount of particulates, a standard deviation around the mean, and a multiplier of the standard deviation. At 745, the statistical parameters include a running distribution.
At 750, a running log is maintained of a mean value of the upper control limit for the amount of particulates over time. At 755, when one or more of the upper control limit for the amount of particulates is trending upwards, and the instantaneous particulate matter reading is above the upper control limit for the amount of particulates, the output signal is generated.
In an embodiment, the calculation of the statistical measure can include several features. At 760, a mean is calculated for the amount of particulates over the time period. At 761, a standard deviation is calculated from the mean. At 762, the upper control limit for the amount of particulates is calculated as a function of the mean and the standard deviation. At 763, the distribution function relating to the amount of particulates over the time period is generated. At 764, a point at which the distribution function intersects the upper control limit for the amount of particulates is determined. At 765, the output signal is generated when the intersection of the upper control limit for the amount of particulates and the distribution function approaches the threshold.
At 770, the output signal is generated as a function of one or more of the number of times that the intersection of the upper control limit for the amount of particulates and the distribution function approaches the threshold and a rate at which the number of times that the intersection of the upper control limit for the amount of particulates and the distribution function approaches the threshold. At 775, the output signal is generated as a function of one or more of an increase in the mean of the amount of particulates over the time period and an increase in the standard deviation from the mean. At 780, the output signal is generated as a function of the upper control limit for the amount of particulates approaching the threshold. This indicates that the sensor cannot distinguish between the distribution of the amount of particulates and an excursion from the distribution of the amount of particulates. At 785, the output signal is generated when the upper control limit for the amount of particulates is less than the threshold and an amount of particulates at a particular point in time exceeds the threshold.
At 790, noise is removed from the signals. This noise removal aids in distinguishing between a compliant particulate matter distribution and a non-compliant particulate matter distribution. At 792, the output signal is used to determine whether a diesel particulate filter is functioning properly. At 794, the amount of particulates is a function of particle size, particle density, and number of particles. At 796, the upper control limit for the amount of particulates is less than the threshold.
Thus, an example particulate matter sensor system has been described. Although specific example embodiments have been described, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. The accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, show by way of illustration, and not of limitation, specific embodiments in which the subject matter may be practiced. The embodiments illustrated are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the art disclosed herein. Other embodiments may be utilized and derived therefrom, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. This Detailed Description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of various embodiments is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full range of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein, individually and/or collectively, by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept if more than one is in fact disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be appreciated that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.
The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b) and will allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature and gist of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims.
In the foregoing description of the embodiments, various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting that the claimed embodiments have more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Description of the Embodiments, with each claim standing on its own as a separate example embodiment.
It should be understood that there exist implementations of other variations and modifications of the invention and its various aspects, as may be readily apparent, for example, to those of ordinary skill in the art, and that the invention is not limited by specific embodiments described herein. Features and embodiments described above may be combined with each other in different combinations. It is therefore contemplated to cover any and all modifications, variations, combinations or equivalents that fall within the scope of the present invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6018944 | Davey et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6112518 | Jerger et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 8151560 | Zanini-Fisher et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120117945 A1 | May 2012 | US |
