The present invention is directed to radio communication devices, and more particularly to technology used in a radio communication device to classify or identify signals in a radio frequency band.
In certain radio communication systems, it would be desirable to know whether and what types of other signals or devices are active. For example, an unlicensed radio frequency band is, by its nature, free to be used by any device that emits within certain power levels in that part of the allocated spectrum. It is possible that many devices would share the unlicensed frequency band at the same time, potentially causing interference with each other. Under these circumstances, it would be useful to identify or classify signals detected in the frequency band in order to know whether a device should take certain actions to avoid interfering with other devices operating in the frequency band.
Briefly, a system and method are provided for classifying signals occurring in a frequency band. One or more characteristics of one or more signals in the frequency band are detected using any suitable technology, such as a device that can generate characteristics of signal pulses detected in the frequency band. Data pertaining to the signal pulses is accumulated over time. The accumulated signal data is compared against reference data associated with known signals to classify the one or more signals in the frequency band based on the comparison. The accumulated data may include one or more characteristics selected from the group consisting of: pulse center frequency, pulse bandwidth, pulse duration, time between pulses and number of different active pulses, and wherein the reference data associated with each of a plurality of known signals comprises one or more characteristics selected from the group consisting of: pulse center frequency, pulse bandwidth, pulse duration and time between pulses. The accumulated signal data is compared against the reference data, and depending on the degree of match with reference data, a signal can be classified. Additional levels of signal classification may include generating a pulse timing signature for each signal pulse and comparing that pulse timing signature with reference pulse timing signatures associated with known signals. Further, samples of the signals themselves can be taken and examined to classify the signal. Further still, classification may involve iterating through a plurality of different signal characteristics to detect signals that meet one or more of the plurality of different signal characteristics.
The above and other objects and advantages will become readily apparent when reference is made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The communication device 1000 has an RF transceiver 200 coupled to one or more antennas 100. An RF interface 300 is coupled to the radio transceiver 200. A spectrum analysis engine (SAGE) 400 is coupled to the radio transceiver 200. The SAGE 400 is a hardware peripheral that generates real-time spectrum activity information. The output of the SAGE 400 is the raw information used in the classification process. The SAGE 400 will be generally described hereinafter with reference to FIG. 4. It should be understood that any device capable of detecting signals in the frequency band and supplying raw information about those signals can be used in a classification process as described herein.
Though not specifically shown, the SAGE 400 may reside in a baseband section of a communication device in a VLSI implementation. A processor 600 executes a classification software program, called the classification engine 500, stored in a processor readable memory 620. Information used by the classification engine 500 to classify signals may be stored locally in a device fingerprint database 610 (also referred to as a profile or reference database). The concept of a fingerprint will be described hereinafter. In addition, new and updated device fingerprints may be downloaded to the communication device 1000 from another communication device 2060 that stores a more comprehensive and updated database 2070 of fingerprint definitions. The processor 600 executing the classification engine 500 may be an on-chip processor in the baseband section, or may be a host processor external to the baseband section, but in the communication device 1000 itself. Alternatively, the classification engine 500 may be executed on another device entirely separate from communication device 1000, in which case communication device 1000 would transmit raw spectrum information generated by the SAGE 400 via a wireless or wired link to the other device. For example, the classification engine could be executed on a server computer that communicates by wire or wirelessly to communication device 1000. Alternatively, if the communication device 1000 is a WLAN station, it may transmit the raw classification information to WLAN device 2045 which may be an access point with greater processing power and capable of overseeing communications in the WLAN. Data output by the SAGE 400 is stored in a memory 620 that the processor 600 accesses when performing the classification operations. The memory 620 may contain the fingerprint database 610 as well.
The communication device 1000 samples the RF spectrum in which it is operating via the radio transceiver 200. The SAGE 400 receives and processes the RF information from the radio transceiver 200 to output first level spectrum information, described hereinafter. The classification engine 500 processes the first level spectrum information with the use of device fingerprints to output information characterizing the activity in the RF spectrum and which classifieds/identifies devices operating in the spectrum. When a signal is“classified,” data that describes the spectral parameters of the signal are determined sufficient to know generally what type of signal it is. The parameters may include the bandwidth, center frequency, frequency hopping rate (if it hops), pulse duration, time between pulses, etc. A signal that is classified can also be“identified” such as by the brand of the chipset that transmits its signal, or perhaps so specific as to identify the brand and model of the device that transmits the signal.
In an unlicensed band, it is inevitable that two or more of these devices will be transmitting at the same time. There is, therefore, a high likelihood that they will interfere with each other. When interference occurs, a signal from one device to another may not be received properly, causing the sending device to retransmit (and therefore reduce throughput), or possibly entirely destroying the communication link between two communication devices. Therefore, being able to classify or identify signals is an important prerequisite to intelligently managing the use of a shared frequency band.
With reference to
Consequently, the first level spectrum information may include one or more of:
With reference to the flow chart of
The classification engine 500 uses device fingerprint definitions from a fingerprint database to compare with accumulated signal pulse data. A fingerprint definition includes signal descriptive information that identifies a device or a class of devices. A fingerprint definition may include:
In step 3030, the classification engine 500 compares the accumulated signal pulse data with reference data of known signals in the fingerprint database 610 and tries to classify the pulse(s). If the pulses can be classified by this comparison step, the process may jump to step 3060 and generate a signal identification alert. If the pulses cannot be classified based on the accumulated data alone, or if additional confirmation is desired, the process continues to step 3040, where pulse timing signatures derived from the pulse events are compared with pulse timing signature templates in the fingerprint database 610. If a match can be determined in step 3040, then the process jumps to step 3060, otherwise, the process continues to step 3050. In step 3050, additional algorithms or iterative tests can be performed that are designed to classify otherwise hard to match pulse types. For example, in some cases, fingerprinting may be enhanced by detecting the leading sync-word of a pulse. Raw ADC samples of the frequency spectrum are analyzed for matches with sync-word formats or patterns in the fingerprint database. An algorithm running on a standard microprocessor can classify most sync-words expected to be detected in the unlicensed frequency band. In step 3060, an identification/classification alert is generated for each signal that either classifies the signal or specifically identifies it. In addition, the power, duty cycle and center frequency (channel) information for each detected and/or identified pulse (referred to as general spectrum utilization descriptions) is output, as well as information generated by the spectrum analyzer (SA statistics) and the signal detector in the SAGE 400. An identification/classification alert may contain center frequency information (when relevant), a signal identification/classification (described above), a probability indicator, as a well as power and duty cycle information for the signal. The signal identification/classification information may indicate whether the signal is a microwave oven, frequency hopping signal (Bluetooth™ SCO or Bluetooth™ ACL, for example), cordless telephone, IEEE 802.11 signal, IEEE 802.15.3 device, or one of various radar types.
The order of the steps for the flowchart in
Information used to build or compile a fingerprint definition is obtained from one or more of the following sources:
Examples of the pulse event data that is generated for exemplary pulses shown in
Pulse 1
Pulse 2
Though not listed above, also included in the information for each pulse is the start time of a pulse, thereby enabling computation of the time between consecutive pulses detected by a pulse detector.
The pulse event data for pulses 7-14 are very similar, with the exception of the center frequency. For example, pulses 7-14 may have a pulse bandwidth of 1 MHz, a pulse duration of 350 microsec, whereas the center frequency will vary across nearly all of the 2400 MHz to 2483 MHz frequency band. The SDID for pulses 7-14 is 2, since pulse detector 2 is configured to detect these types of pulses, for example.
Turning to
Similarly, there is a bandwidth histogram that tracks a given bandwidth observed for signal pulses. For example, if the entire bandwidth of the frequency band is 80 MHz, then there may be 80 1 MHz slots that are used to count the amount of time a pulse is at a particular bandwidth. Again, after a certain amount of time, each bandwidth count is divided by a total amount of time that the pulses were being transmitted in order generate a percentage value. For example, each byte bwPercent[N] represents the percentage of pulses having a bandwidth of N.
The pulse duration and time between pulses (also called pulse gap) observed for a signal pulse may be tracked with separate histograms that have generally the same form as shown in FIG. 7. There may be three categories of pulse duration and time between pulses: short, medium and long, partitioned by appropriate thresholds. The categories can be broken down as follows:
Each of the bins represents the percentage of occurrences of gaps or durations within the range of that bin. The percentage values range from 0 to 100, with accuracy with ½ percentage point. For example, an 8-bit unsigned value from 0 to 200 can be used to represent the 0 to 100 percentage value.
Another data that can be generated and used for signal classification and other purposes is data that tracks the number of different simultaneous transmissions in the frequency band during a period of time. The active transmission histogram is an example of such data. It shows the percentage or time that one to 4 or more different signal transmissions were in progress during a sampling interval, based on the number of different pulses tracked by the 4 pulse detectors. It should be understood that 4 is only an example of the number of different pulses that could be simultaneously tracked. This type of data is very useful in determining when two or more signals of the same or different type are simultaneously active in the frequency band.
The reference signal pulse data against which the accumulated signal pulse data is compared, is similar in structure to the accumulated signal pulse data. The active transmission data is useful to classify signals that are simultaneously occurring in the frequency band; it is not generally part of the reference data for a particular signal type, but is useful intelligence to process the signal data.
Pulse time signatures can provide a distinctive representation of a device or class of devices. In some cases, they can be used to confirm a suspected match with a particular signal type.
Another way to iteratively search for different signal characteristics is to iteratively operate the pulse detectors in the SAGE with different parameters, with the goal of eventually detecting signal pulses that match the configured parameters of a pulse detector. The matching signal pulse characteristics are accumulated over time, and then run through the signal classification processes.
One or more radio receivers may be coupled to the radio I/F 300. For example, one radio receiver 210 may be dedicated to one frequency band (such as the 2.4 GHz unlicensed band) and another radio receiver 220 may be dedicated to another frequency band (such as the 5 GHz unlicensed bands). A switch 230 selects the baseband analog output from one of the radio receivers, and couples it to an ADC 240, which is in turn coupled to the radio I/F 300. The DAC 250 is used to couple control signals to the radio receivers to, for example, control the bandwidth of operation of the radio receiver for wideband or narrowband operation. The larger dotted block around the elements in
The host processor 5010 performs the functions to control, and interface with, the SAGE 400, as well as other functions, such as executing the classification engine based on the output of the SAGE 400. In addition, another application program residing in the memory 5020 of the host device 5000 may generate a graphic user interface display of the SAGE and/or classification engine output, as shown in FIG. 16. In addition, there may controls to trigger display of newly captured data as shown by the buttons at the top of FIG. 16.
Moreover, the radio I/F 300 and SAGE 400 are shown in phantom to indicate that all of the functions of these components may be performed by a software program stored in the memory 910 and executed by the host processor 900. In this configuration, the output of the ADC 240 is coupled through an interface, such as the cardbus interface 570 to the host processor 5010, which executes processes that would otherwise be performed in hardware by the SAGE 400, as well as the classification engine and other processes referred to above.
In sum, a method is provided for classifying signals occurring in a frequency band, comprising detecting one or more characteristics of one or more signals in the frequency band; accumulating signal data pertaining to the signals over time; comparing the signal data against reference data associated with known signals; and classifying the one or more signals in the frequency band based on the comparison. Similarly, a system is provided for classifying signals occurring in a frequency band, comprising: a memory that stores accumulated signal data pertaining to signals occurring in the frequency band over time; and a processor coupled to the memory that compares the accumulated signal data against reference data to classify the one or more signals in the frequency band.
Moreover, a method is provided for generating data indicative of a signal of a device operating in a frequency band, comprising steps of detecting a signal transmitted by the device operating in the frequency band; accumulating signal data pertaining the signal over time; and generating characteristics of the signal data useful to classify or identify the device when it operates in the frequency band.
Further still, a processor readable medium is provided that is encoded with instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the steps of comparing signal data against reference data associated with known signals; and classifying the one or more signals in the frequency band based on the comparison.
The above description is intended by way of example only.
This application claims priority to each of the following U.S. Provisional Applications, all of which are incorporated herein by reference: Application No. 60/374,365, filed Apr. 22, 2002. Application No. 60/374,363, filed Apr. 22, 2002. Application No. 60/380,891, filed May 16, 2002. Application No. 60/380,890, filed May 16, 2002. Application No. 60/319,435, filed Jul. 30, 2002. Application No. 60/319,542, filed Sep. 11, 2002. This application is related to each of the following commonly assigned U.S. Non-Provisional Applications, filed on even date (the entirety of both of which is incorporated herein by reference): U.S. Application No. 10/246,365, entitled“System and Method for Real-Time Spectrum Analysis in a Communication Device.” U.S. Application No. 10/246,363, entitled“System and Method for Spectrum Management of a Shared Frequency Band.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3609553 | Frazier et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3812291 | Brodes et al. | May 1974 | A |
4166980 | Apostolos et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4227255 | Carrick et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4271523 | Gable | Jun 1981 | A |
4501020 | Wakeman | Feb 1985 | A |
4597107 | Ready et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4845707 | Isaacson et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4947338 | Vistica | Aug 1990 | A |
4979211 | Benvenuto et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5005210 | Ferrell | Apr 1991 | A |
5144642 | Weinberg et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5210820 | Kenyon | May 1993 | A |
5353346 | Cox et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5432862 | Hirsch | Jul 1995 | A |
5608727 | Perreault et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5651030 | Wong et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5687163 | Fox et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5832038 | Carsello | Nov 1998 | A |
5905949 | Hawkes et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912922 | Koszarsky et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6084919 | Kleider et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6240282 | Kleider et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240372 | Gross et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6385434 | Chuprun et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6463294 | Holma et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466614 | Smith | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6519541 | Bitton | Feb 2003 | B1 |
20010019543 | Mueckenheim et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020086641 | Howard | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020137485 | Nilsson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020142744 | Okanoue et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154614 | Jagger et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020155811 | Prismantas et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173272 | Liang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030040277 | Deats | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050012 | Black et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030123420 | Sherlock | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030198200 | Diener et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198304 | Sugar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030224741 | Sugar et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040023674 | Miller | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028003 | Diener et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028123 | Sugar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2260336 | Aug 2000 | CA |
2298316 | Aug 2000 | CA |
2000-022712 | Jan 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040203826 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60319542 | Sep 2002 | US | |
60319435 | Jul 2002 | US | |
60380890 | May 2002 | US | |
60380891 | May 2002 | US | |
60374363 | Apr 2002 | US | |
60374365 | Apr 2002 | US |