This invention relates generally to the communication field, and more specifically to a new and useful system and method for signaling through data storage in the communication field.
The explosion of mobile devices hasn't replaced other types of devices from use. Instead, today's world increasingly sees users with many devices, using them interchangeably to accomplish tasks. On the way to work users check email and chat rooms on mobile phones, and then at work users transition to laptops to continue working. When users enter a conference room, they may transition again to a different machine, but in modern apps the expect context to be maintained across those devices. Building out applications with such robust multi-modal accessibility is challenging and time consuming process. Additionally, many new applications depend on establishing various forms of communication, often real-time messaging communication. However, building such technical solutions is complicated and time consuming. Thus, there is a need in the communication field to create a new and useful system and method for signaling through data storage. This invention provides such a new and useful system and method.
The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
1. System for Signaling Through Data
As shown in
As shown in the embodiment of
As shown in an exemplary application of the system 100 in
The cloud data synchronization system 101 functions to provide a network accessible resource to manage data synchronization. The cloud data synchronization system 101 can serve as the source of truth concerning state information. Clients (131, 132) synchronize with the cloud data synchronization system 101 rather than resolving various updates from multiple clients to determine their own state. In some implementations, the cloud data synchronization system 101 is hosted in a cloud-based, distributed computing infrastructure. In some implementations, the cloud data synchronization system 101 is hosted on any suitable computing infrastructure. In some implementations, the cloud data synchronization system 101 is accessible over the internet, a local network, or any suitable data connection. In some implementations, the data synchronization system 101 is implemented ad-hoc between multiple clients, where a master client device may run a client-based implementation of the data synchronization system.
In some implementations, the cloud data synchronization system 101 is part of a multi-tenant system wherein multiple and distinct entities can build applications and/or services utilizing the system 101 while sharing common computing resources. In some implementations, the multi-tenant cloud data synchronization system includes an accounting system that partitions usage and configuration by accounts and optionally sub-accounts of parent accounts. For example, an application developer can build a data synchronization solution for a first mobile application, and a second developer can build a data synchronization solution for a different and distinct mobile application. Authentication, configuration, usage, data, billing, and/or other properties of the system can be kept distinct. In some implementations, the system 101 is implemented as a single-tenant system.
In some implementations, the cloud data synchronization system 101 includes a data synchronization storage system, which functions to store data, records, and other information that relates to data synchronization instances (e.g., 110).
In some implementations, the cloud data synchronization system 101 includes at least one programmatic interface. In some implementations, the programmatic interface includes an API. In some implementations, the API is a RESTful API but may alternatively be any suitable API such as SOAP or custom protocol. The RESTful API works according to an application layer request and response model. An application layer request and response model may use an HTTP-based protocol (HTTP or HTTPS), SPDY, or any suitable application layer protocol. Herein, HTTP may be used, but should not be interpreted as being limited to the HTTP protocol. HTTP requests (or any suitable request communication) to the communication platform preferably observe the principles of a RESTful design. RESTful is understood in this document to describe a Representational State Transfer architecture as is known in the art. The RESTful HTTP requests are preferably stateless, thus each message communicated contains all necessary information for processing the request and generating a response. The API service can include various resources, which act as endpoints that can act as a mechanism for specifying requested information or requesting particular actions. The resources can be expressed as URI's or resource paths. The RESTful API resources can additionally be responsive to different types of HTTP methods such as GET, Put, POST and/or DELETE. In some implementations, the data synchronization instances (e.g., 110), aspects of the data synchronization instances, and/or other aspects can be manipulated and accessed as RESTful API resources. In some implementations, the programmatic interface includes a client interface, which enables clients or other devices to interface with the cloud data synchronization system 101. In some implementations, the client interface is a restricted or private API or any suitable programmatic interface. In some implementations, client devices use the public API using a client SDK, library, or native implementation. In some implementations, the system 101 includes an administration user interface. An account or subaccount holder can use the administration user interface to manage data synchronization and state management.
The data synchronization instance 110 functions to encapsulate and characterize the management of data synchronization between clients (e.g., 131, 132). In some implementations, the data synchronization instance 110 is preferably accessible through the programmatic interface(s). In some implementations, a data synchronization instance is uniquely mapped to a session state. In some implementations, an application uses multiple data synchronization sessions, which correspond to multiple, different communication sessions, threads, or channels. For example, an IP messaging application can use a different data synchronization instance for each chat thread.
In some implementations, a data synchronization instance includes option configuration. In some implementations, various options enable control over data handling, access permissions, validation rules, and/or other forms of customization. In some implementations, data handling enables various rules to be enforced related to how the data is stored such as setting how data is stored geographically, how long data is persisted, and/or other suitable options. In some implementations, permissions are set on how the data synchronization instance can be accessed and/or modified. For example, access permissions can be set so that a first set of entities is permitted to edit state while a second set of clients can only access the state. In some implementations, the data synchronization instance 110 manages the state representation object 111 that is synchronized between clients. In some implementation, the state representation object (111, 141, 142) is stored and/or represented in any suitable form. In some implementations, the state representation object (111, 141, 142) is a text-based document that expresses information through a suitable data structure object. In some implementations, the state representation object (111, 141, 142) is one of JSON, plain text, SML, base64 encoded items, or any suitable document type. In some implementations, the state representation object (111, 141, 142) uses key value stores to characterize various properties of the state. In some implementations, standardized protocol/syntax is expected for a state representation object (111, 141, 142). In some implementations, a subset of basic keys and values are required, recommended, and/or optional. For example, a state representation object can follow a basic pattern for indicating how state updates are time stamped and/or prioritized so that conflicts are resolved. In some implementations, at least a portion of the state representation object (111, 141, 142) is highly customized to adapt to the particular application and/or use case. For example, various keys and hierarchical data structures can be used to represent an application's particular state.
In some implementations, the cloud data synchronization system 101 includes a resolution system 112, which functions to process state updates to a data synchronization instance and resolve inconsistencies. In some implementations, a set of rules and/or heuristics are built into the resolution system 112 so that inconsistent state updates made from various clients can be resolved. In some implementations, the resolved state and/or any suitable resolution alerts is communicated to clients (131, 132) through the state representation object (111, 141, 142).
The client data synchronization modules 121, 122 function to act as a client tool for interacting with the data representation object. In some implementations, the client data synchronization modules 121, 122 operate as a component of an application or service on a client device (131, 132). In some implementations, a client device (e.g., 131, 132) is at least one of a phone, a wearable computer, a personal computer, a browser, an IoT device, and/or any suitable computing device. In some implementations, client data synchronization model (121, 122) is part of an SDK, a library, or any development tool. In some implementations, client data synchronization model (121, 122) is provided for a variety of popular device clients (e.g. Android, iPhone, in-browser JavaScript) and server clients (e.g. NodeJS, Ruby on Rails, Java . . . ) languages/platforms. From the developer perspective, a set of tools is provided for interacting with a local state representation object. The synchronization of the state representation object (141, 142) is transparent to the application (161, 162).
The system 100 can be usable without any knowledge of underlying storage, retrieval, and synchronization mechanisms. The system 100 and in particular the data synchronization elements described above can be used with additional technology layers to further power application functionality as shown in
In some implementations, the system 331 is similar to the client device 131 of
In some implementations, the system 331 includes an application layer 351 that operates on top of the data synchronization layer 321. In some implementations, the application layer 351 is customized for business logic and functionality specific to the use case. In some implementations, the application layer 351 is an IP messaging layer. In some implementations, as part of an IP messaging layer, a client SDK or library is provided that interfaces with a state representation object 341 to support general IP messaging operations. In some implementations, the application 361 uses the IP messaging layer 351 to create channels, add members, and/or send/read messages. During these operations, the IP messaging layer 351 uses the data synchronization layer 321 to update and read from the data representation object 341 and simultaneously the data representation object 341 is synchronized to various clients as part of a data synchronization instance. In some implementations, the application layer 351 is an IoT (internet of things) device management layer. In some implementations, common IoT tasks and operations are represented in a higher-level abstraction layer that utilizes the underlying data synchronization layer to coordinate operation of multiple IoT devices.
In some implementations, the system 331 includes a connectivity layer 351 that is used by the data synchronization layer 321 to coordinate communication with the cloud 310 and client devices. In some implementations, the connectivity layer 351 is a notification layer that enables push notifications. In some implementations, the connectivity layer 351 is a polling layer that manages how clients and the cloud 310 periodically request updates.
In some implementations, the data synchronization layer 311 is similar to the data synchronization layer 321. In some implementations, the data synchronization layer 311 is similar to the data synchronization instance 110 of
In some implementations, the data synchronization instance of the system 310 is similar to the data synchronization instance 110 of
In some implementations, the reference data representation object of the cloud data synchronization system 310 is similar to the reference state representation object 111 of
In some implementations, the connectivity layer 312 of the system 310 is similar to the connectivity layer 351. In some implementations, the connectivity layer 312 is used by the data synchronization layer 311 to coordinate communication with the client devices (331). In some implementations, the connectivity layer 312 is a notification layer that enables push notifications. In some implementations, the connectivity layer 312 is a polling layer that manages how clients and the cloud 310 periodically request updates.
2. Method for Signaling Through Data Synchronization
As shown in
The method 400 can be used in a variety of scenarios. In some implementations, in a first scenario, the method 400 is used to synchronize multiple devices (e.g., 131, 132) of a single account. For example, a mobile phone application and a desktop browser version of some service can be made to be eventually consistence by building on top of the data synchronization layer (e.g., 321). In some implementations, in a second scenario, the method 400 is used in synchronizing communication between multiple devices (e.g., 131, 132) of different accounts. For example, a chat program and the state of the chat can be synchronized between two accounts using the method 400. The state representation object is preferably updated in substantially real-time such that real-time communication can be conveyed. In some implementations, the state representation object of a client device (e.g., 141, 142 of
In some embodiments, the method 400 is implemented by a system substantially similar the system 100. In some embodiments, the method 400 is implemented by a system substantially similar the system 300. In some embodiments, the method 400 is implemented by any suitable system. In some implementations, the method 400 is implemented by a system similar to the system 300, and the method 400 is used in combination with an application layer (similar to 351) where the synchronization of state is used to provide an IP messaging framework. In some implementations, the method 400 is implemented by a system similar to the system 300, and the method 400 is used in combination with an application layer (similar to 351) where the synchronization of state is used to provide an IoT device management framework. In some implementations, the method 400 is implemented by a system similar to the system 300, and the method 400 is used in combination with an application layer (similar to 351) where the synchronization of state is used to provide any suitable application framework. In some implementations, the method 400 is used with a connectivity layer (similar to 351, 312) to facilitate how notifications and information is relayed between clients and/or the cloud system.
Block S110, which includes configuring a data synchronization instance (e.g., 110 of
In some implementations, setting customization of the instance (e.g., 110) customizes various options of the data synchronization instance (e.g., 110). In some implementations, setting customization includes setting geographic data storage options. In some implementations, geographic data storage options determine which region or regions are used for storing data. In some implementations, the geographic data storage options provide a blacklist of countries, regions, or locations where data should not be stored. In some implementations, setting customization includes setting data encryption settings. In some implementations, data encryption is managed on the edge clients. In some implementations, data encryption options are enabled in association with the data synchronization instance (e.g., 110). In some implementations, setting customization includes setting permissions of the data synchronization instance (e.g., 110), which functions to provide an access control list to enforce policy on interactions with the data synchronization instance. In some implementations, the permissions define the read permissions, write permissions, and/or other management permissions. In some implementations, permissions are set by at least one of account, device identity, device properties, and/or any suitable rule. For example, one account may only have read access permissions and so clients of that account can be driven by the state of the data synchronization instance but may not be able to alter state.
Block S120, which includes storing a state representation object, functions to use a local object (e.g., 141, 142) as a conduit for implying state update requests with connected clients (e.g., 131, 132). In some implementations, storing a state representation object includes storing a reference state representation object (e.g., 111 of
In some implementations, a local state representation object (e.g., 141, 142) is stored for each client application (e.g., 161, 162). In some implementations, a state representation object is stored in the cloud data synchronization system (e.g., 101, 310). In some implementations, the cloud data synchronization system (e.g., 101, 310) includes a single reference source of truth representation (e.g., 111). In some implementations, the cloud data synchronization system (e.g., 101, 310) includes various instances of the state representation object, which depend on the reference source. In some implementations, a local state representation object (e.g., 141, 142) is created in association with an identifier of a data synchronization instance (e.g., 110). State representation objects of other client instances (e.g., 132, 134 of
In some implementations, the method 400 includes providing an application layer (e.g., 151, 152 of
Block S130, which includes synchronizing the state representation object, functions to coordinate communication of state updates. Changes to the local state representation object (e.g., 141, 142, 341) are detected within the client (e.g., 131, 132, 331) and then uploaded to the cloud data synchronization system (e.g., 101, 310). Similarly, outside changes to a state representation object (e.g., 142) by another client (e.g., 132) are transferred and applied to the local version (e.g., 141) on the client (e.g., 131). In some implementations, updates are transmitted to the remote cloud system (e.g., 101, 310) in response to a change. In some implementations, a minimum time since the last update is enforced to limit the number of notifications transmitted to the cloud system (e.g., 101, 310). In some implementations, updates are transmitted periodically. In some implementations, the cloud system (e.g., 101, 310) requests updates from the client (e.g., 131, 132, 331). In other words, the cloud system (e.g., 101, 310) polls the clients (e.g., 131, 132, 331) for updates. Any suitable approach may be used in how and when updates are synchronized between clients and the cloud system. Synchronizing the state representation object additionally includes distributing state information updates to a client (e.g., 131, 132, 331). In some implementations, updates are transmitted back to the clients (e.g., 131, 132) in response to updates made to the reference representation (e.g., 111) of state information in the cloud (e.g., 110). In some implementations, the updates are transferred and handled through the client data synchronization module (e.g., 121, 122) in block S140 such that the end application logic (e.g., 151, 152, 162, 162) built by the developer does not need to process incoming updates—the updates are automatically synchronized. For example, if the client is a user application, the view of the application can be reactive to changes in the state representation object such that any synchronized updates can be automatically reflected in the state of the user application.
In some implementations, the full state representation object is transferred between the clients and cloud system. In some implementations, the differences or partial representations are transmitted to reduce the amount of data transferred during each update. In some implementations, synchronizing the state representation object includes the cloud system (e.g., 101, 310) tracking the version of state representation for associated clients. The version information can be used to determine which clients need updates.
In some implementations, the method 400 includes providing a connectivity layer (e.g., 351), which functions to provide a framework that manages how the information and alerts are transmitted between the clients and the cloud system. In some implementations, the connectivity layer (e.g., 351) uses any suitable communication transport layer such as a HTTP-based protocol (HTTP or HTTPS), SPDY, or any suitable transport protocol. In some implementations, the connectivity layer (e.g., 351) facilitates push notifications where updates can be actively pushed or transmitted to appropriate entities. In some implementations, in the case of sending an update from the cloud system to a client, the update is accompanied by a notification such as a push notification displayed within the operating system of the client device. In some implementations, the connectivity layer specifies a polling process in which the clients and/or the cloud system poll for updates.
In some implementations, synchronizing the state representation object includes resolving conflicts. In some implementations, the cloud system receives updated state information from a plurality of clients. In some implementations, updates to the state representation may conflict with updates from one or more other clients. For example, if one client made changes during a temporary lack of connectivity, those changes could be in conflict with changes made by other clients. In some implementations, the cloud system processes the various updates from clients and determines a resolution that incorporates the changes into a single state representation. In some implementations, time based prioritization of updates are used. In some implementations, rules are defined on how particular updates are prioritized and resolved. In some implementations, rules are pre-configured as part of the configuration of a data synchronization instance. In some implementations, resolving conflicts includes retrieving resolution guidance from an outside source. For example, a configured callback URI can be messaged over HTTP/S with relevant information. In some implementations, the relevant information includes current reference state information and the conflicting state updates. In some implementations, the system of the callback URI sends a response that includes instructions on how to resolve the conflict.
Block S140, which includes updating the operational state of a second client based on the state representation object, functions to make an application or service react to synchronized changes to the state representation object. In some implementations, a client data synchronization module (e.g., 121, 122) includes a framework for signaling when the state representation object (e.g., 141, 142) was updated. In some implementations, how the state representation object (e.g., 141, 142) was updated is communicated. In some implementations, the application logic (e.g., 151, 152) is built to automatically respond to changes in the state representation object (e.g., 141, 142).
The use of synchronized state representation data can provide an alternative to request response signaling in a communication application. All the state information that is to be communicated between clients is preferably represented within the state representation object (e.g., 141, 142), and so inbound communications or state changes are communicated through the state representation object (e.g., 141, 142) as opposed to signaling messages transmitted through some protocol.
As one exemplary use case, the method for signaling through data synchronization can be applied to a messaging application. In some implementations, the messaging application is designed using a data synchronization and IP messaging framework that facilitates the use of a data representation object (e.g., 141, 142, 341) in synchronization with a cloud system (e.g., 101, 310). In some implementations, a first client application (e.g., 161) creates a new chat channel to communicate with the other channels. In some implementations, a data synchronization instance (e.g., 110) is created and a set of client applications preferably joins the data synchronization instance. In some implementations, a local data representation object (e.g., 141, 142, 341) or file is established on each of the client devices (e.g., 131, 132, 331). In some implementations, the state of the local data representation object (e.g., 141, 142) represents the properties of the channel such as channel name, members, channel permissions, and/or other settings. These channel properties are synchronized across all the local data representation objects. Then a client application will post a new message. That client will add the new message as an element in the state representation object, and the state representation object will be synchronized with the cloud system. The cloud system will update the reference version of the state representation object and transmit the updated information to the other clients. In some implementations, the clients update their display to represent the new message. In some implementations, subsequent messages, media, and/or other channel interactions is communicated using the state representation object.
3. Application Platform Systems
In some implementations, the application platform system 501 of
The application platform system 501 includes the client systems 511 and 512, the DSS 520, and the application server system 531.
The client system 511 includes a local client API state object 523 and a local communication state object 561. In some implementations, the local communication state object 561 is a chat channel state object. The client system 512 includes a local client API state object 524 and a local communication state object 562. In some implementations, the local communication state object 562 is a chat channel state object.
The DSS 520 includes a data synchronization instance 541 for an account of the DSS (“Account A”). The data synchronization instance 541 includes a reference API state object 521, a reference API state object 522, and a reference communication state object 551. In some implementations, the reference communication state object 551 is a chat channel state object.
The application server system 531 includes a local server API state object 525, a local server API state object 526, and a local communication state object 563. In some implementations, the local communication state object 563 is a chat channel state object.
In some implementations, the local communication state objects 561, 562 and 563 are synchronized with the reference communication state object 551. In some implementations, the local client API state object 523 and the local server API state object 525 are synchronized with the reference API state object 521. In some implementations, the local client API state object 524 and the local server API state object 526 are synchronized with the reference API state object 522. In some implementations, the local client API state object 523, the local server API state object 525, and the reference API state object 521 provide communication between the client system 511 and the application server system 531. In some implementations, the local client API state object 523, the local server API state object 525, and the reference API state object 521 provide communication of API requests and API responses of an API of the application server system 531 between the client system 511 and the application server system 531.
In some implementations, the local client API state object 524, the local server API state object 526, and the reference API state object 522 provide communication between the client system 512 and the application server system 531. In some implementations, the local client API state object 524, the local server API state object 526, and the reference API state object 522 provide communication of API requests and API responses of an API of the application server system 531 between the client system 512 and the application server system 531.
In some implementations, the state objects 523, 521 and 525 include API request data and API response data communicated between the client system 511 and the application server system 531. In some implementations, the state objects 524, 522 and 526 include API request data and API response data communicated between the client system 512 and the application server system 531. In some implementations, API request data includes at least one of: create new chat API request data, join chat request data, add participant request data, send message to chat request data. In some implementations, API response data includes at least one of: create new chat API response data, join chat response data, add participant response data, send message to chat response data.
In some implementations, create new chat API request data includes at least one of chat title and chat description. In some implementations, create new chat API response data includes at least one of request execution status, an identifier of a reference state object (e.g., 551) for the created chat, and a unique identifier of the chat channel.
In some implementations, join chat request data includes at least the unique identifier of the chat channel. In some implementations, join chat response data includes at least one of request execution status and an identifier of a reference state object (e.g., 551) for the joined chat.
In some implementations, add participant request data includes at least one of the unique identifier of the chat channel and a username of a participant to be added to the chat channel. In some implementations, add participant response data includes at least one of request execution status and an identifier of a reference state object (e.g., 551) for the chat.
In some implementations, send message to chat request data includes at least one of the unique identifier of the chat channel and a chat message. In some implementations, send message to chat response data includes at least one of request execution status and a unique identifier of the sent chat message.
In some implementations, the local communication state objects 561, 562 and 563 and the reference communication state object 551 provide communication between the client system 511 and the client system 512. In some implementations, the local communication state objects 561, 562 and 563 and the reference communication state object 551 provide chat channel communication between the client system 511 and the client system 512.
In some implementations, the state objects 561, 562, 563 and 551 include message data communicated between the client system 511 and the client system 512. In some implementations, the state objects 561, 562, 563 and 551 include chat channel state data for a chat channel in which the client system 511 and the client system 512 participate. In some implementations, the chat channel state includes chat messages of the chat channel. In some implementations, the chat channel state includes at least one of chat identifier, chat title, chat description, list of chat messages and their properties (e.g., sender, time stamp, read status), list of chat participants and their properties (e.g., role).
In some implementations, the client systems 511 and 512, the data synchronization instance 541, and the application server system 531 are associated with a first DSS account (e.g., “Account A”) of a plurality of accounts managed by an account system (not shown) of the DSS 520. In some implementations, the client systems 511 and 512, and the application server system 531 are systems of an account holder of a first DSS account (e.g., “Account A”) of a plurality of accounts managed by an account system (not shown) of the DSS 520. In some implementations, the client systems 511 and 512, and the application server system 531 are external to the DSS 520.
In some implementations, the client systems 511 and 512 are similar to the client systems 131 and 132 of
In some implementations, a first set of one or more data synchronization instances for the DSS account of the application server system 531 manages the reference communication state objects of the DSS account of the application server system 531, and a second set of one or more data synchronization instances for the DSS account of the application server system 531 manages the reference API state objects of the DSS account of the application server system 531. In some implementations, each state object of the DSS account of the application server system 531 is managed by a different data synchronization instance for the DSS account of the application server system 531.
In some implementations, the application server system 531 provides a plurality of communication channels, the application server system 531 includes a local communication state object (similar to 563) for each communication channel, and the DSS 520 includes a reference communication state object (similar to 551) for each communication channel. In some implementations, each communication channel is a chat channel. In some implementations, each reference communication state object for the DSS account of the application server system 531 is managed by a single data synchronization instance for the DSS account of the application server system 531. In some implementations, a plurality of data synchronization instances for the DSS account of the application server system 531 manage the plurality of reference communication state objects for the DSS account of the application server system 531.
In some implementations, the application platform system 502 of
The application platform system 502 includes the client systems 513 and 514, the DSS 520, and the application server system 532.
The client system 513 includes a local client API state object 564. The client system 514 includes a local client API state object 565.
The DSS 520 includes a data synchronization instance 542 for an account of the DSS (“Account B”). The data synchronization instance 542 includes a reference API state object 552 and a reference API state object 553.
The application server system 532 includes a local server API state object 566, and a local server API state object 591.
In some implementations, the local client API state object 564 and the local server API state object 566 are synchronized with the reference API state object 552. In some implementations, the local client API state object 565 and the local server API state object 591 are synchronized with the reference API state object 553.
In some implementations, the local client API state object 564, the local server API state object 566, and the reference API state object 552 provide communication between the client system 513 and the application server system 532. In some implementations, the local client API state object 564, the local server API state object 566, and the reference API state object 552 provide communication of API requests and API responses of an API of the application server system 532 between the client system 513 and the application server system 532.
In some implementations, the local client API state object 565, the local server API state object 591, and the reference API state object 553 provide communication between the client system 514 and the application server system 532. In some implementations, the local client API state object 565, the local server API state object 591, and the reference API state object 553 provide communication of API requests and API responses of an API of the application server system 532 between the client system 514 and the application server system 532.
In some implementations, the state objects 552, 564 and 566 include API request data and API response data communicated between the client system 513 and the application server system 532. In some implementations, the state objects 553, 565 and 591 include API request data and API response data communicated between the client system 514 and the application server system 532.
In some implementations, the client systems 513 and 514, the data synchronization instance 542, and the application server system 532 are associated with a second DSS account (e.g., “Account B”) of a plurality of accounts managed by an account system (not shown) of the DSS 520. In some implementations, the client systems 513 and 514, and the application server system 532 are systems of an account holder of a second DSS account (e.g., “Account B”) of a plurality of accounts managed by an account system (not shown) of the DSS 520. In some implementations, the client systems 513 and 514, and the application server system 532 are external to the DSS 520.
In some implementations, the client systems 513 and 514 are similar to the client systems 131 and 132 of
In some implementations, the DSS 520 manages reference API state objects for a plurality of DSS accounts. In some implementations, the DSS 520 manages reference API state objects for a plurality of DSS accounts, and each DSS account is associated with at least one application server system that communicates API requests and responses of an API of the application server system with at least one client system by synchronizing local API state objects with the reference API state object managed by the DSS.
In some implementations, a plurality of client systems (e.g., the client system 513 and another client system, not shown) are constructed to synchronize their respective local client API state objects (e.g., 564) with the same reference API state object (e.g., 552). In some implementations, a first device (e.g., a mobile phone) used by a first user communicates with the application server system 532 via the DSS 520, and the DSS 520 stores the application state of the communication in the reference API state object 552 of the DSS; when the first user transitions to a second device (e.g., a laptop), the second device used by the first user accesses the reference API state object 552 of the DSS to obtain the user's application state. In this manner, application state can be maintained across a plurality of devices used by a user.
In some implementations, the application platform system 503 of
The application platform system 503 includes the client systems 515 and 516, and the DSS 520.
The client system 515 includes a local communication state object 567. In some implementations, the local communication state object 567 is a chat channel state object. The client system 516 includes a local communication state object 568. In some implementations, the local communication state object 568 is a chat channel state object.
The DSS 520 includes a data synchronization instance 543 for an account of the DSS (“Account C”). The data synchronization instance 543 includes a reference communication state object 554. In some implementations, the reference communication state object 554 is a chat channel state object.
In some implementations, the local communication state objects 567 and 568 are synchronized with the reference communication state object 554.
In some implementations, the local communication state objects 567 and 568, and the reference communication state object 554 provide communication between the client system 515 and the client system 516. In some implementations, the local communication state objects 567 and 568, and the reference communication state object 554 provide chat channel communication between the client system 515 and the client system 516.
In some implementations, the client systems 515 and 516, and the data synchronization instance 543 are associated with a third DSS account (e.g., “Account C”) of a plurality of accounts managed by an account system (not shown) of the DSS 520. In some implementations, the client systems 515 and 516 are systems of an account holder of a third DSS account (e.g., “Account C”) of a plurality of accounts managed by an account system (not shown) of the DSS 520. In some implementations, the client systems 515 and 516 are external to the DSS 520.
In some implementations, the client systems 515 and 516 are similar to the client systems 131 and 132 of
In some implementations, the DSS 520 manages reference communication state objects for a plurality of DSS accounts.
4. Application Platform Methods
The method 600 of
In some embodiments, the method 600 includes: the DSS 630 configuring a first data synchronization instance (e.g., 541, 542, 543) for a first account of the DSS (e.g., “Account A”, “Account B”, “Account C”), responsive to a request provided by a system of the first account, wherein the first data synchronization instance manages a first reference state representation object (e.g., 521, 522, 551-554) for the first account at the DSS (process S601); the first application system 610 storing a first local state representation object (e.g., 523-526, 561-568, 591) that corresponds to the first reference state representation object of the DSS, wherein the first application system is constructed to receive first reference state representation object update notifications provided by the DSS (process S602); the second application system 620 storing a second local state representation object (e.g., 523-526, 561-568, 591) that corresponds to the first reference state representation object of the DSS, wherein the second application system is constructed to receive first reference state representation object update notifications provided by the DSS (process S603); the first application system 610 transforming a first application instruction of the first application system into a first state update, and modifying the first local state representation object to include the first state update (process S604); the first application system 610 providing at least the first state update of the modified first local state representation object to the DSS via a first local state representation object update notification (process S605); responsive to the first state update, the DSS 630 determining whether to modify the first reference state representation object of the DSS to include the first state update (process S606); responsive to a determination by the DSS to modify the first reference state representation object to include the first state update, the DSS 630 modifying the first reference state representation object to include the first state update (process S607); the DSS 630 providing at least the first state update to the second application system via a first reference state representation object update notification (process S608); and responsive to the first state update, the second application system 620 modifying the second local state representation object to include the first state update (process S609). The first application system 610 and the second application system 620 communicate by using the DSS.
In some embodiments, the method 600 includes: the second application system transforming a second application instruction of the second application system into a second state update, and modifying the second local state representation object to include the second state update; and the second application system providing at least the second state update of the modified second local state representation object to the DSS. The DSS determining whether to modify the first state representation object of the DSS to include the first state update includes: the DSS determining whether the first state update conflicts with the second state update; and responsive to a determination that the first state update conflicts with the second state update, the DSS resolving the conflict between the first state update and the second state update.
In some embodiments, the first application system is a client system (e.g., 511-516) that includes a first client application (e.g., 161, 162 of
In some embodiments, the first application system is an application server system (e.g., 531-532) that includes a first application server, the first application server system is the system that provides the request to configure the first data synchronization instance (e.g., 541, 542) for the first account, the second application system is a client system (e.g., 511-514) that includes a first client application, and the first client application and the first application server communicate via the DSS 520.
In some embodiments, the first application system is a client system (e.g., 511-514) that includes a first client application, the second application system is an application server system (e.g., 531-532) that includes a first application server, at least one of the application server system and the client system is the system that provides the request to configure the first data synchronization instance (e.g., 541, 542) for the first account, and the first client application and the first application server communicate via the DSS 520. In some embodiments, the method 600 includes: the application server system (e.g., 531-532) determining whether the first state update corresponds to a command of the first application server; and responsive to a determination by application server system (e.g., 531-532) that the first state update corresponds to a command of the first application server, the application server system (e.g., 531-532) executing the command and providing a response to the client system via the DSS 520.
In some embodiments, the system of the first account provides the request to configure the first data synchronization instance via at least one of an administrator user interface and a programmatic interface. In some embodiments, the system of the first account is at least one of the first application system and the second application system.
In some embodiments, the DSS 520 configuring the first data synchronization instance (the process S601) includes: the DSS 520 configuring at least one option of the first data synchronization instance (e.g., 541-543), and the at least one option includes at least one of: a geographic data storage option, a data encryption setting, and a permission of the data synchronization instance.
In some embodiments, the first application system stores the first local state representation object (e.g., 523-526, 561-568 and 591) responsive to at least one of: a communication provided by the second application system, a communication provided by the DSS 520, a communication provided by the system of the first account, and an application instruction of a first application of the first application system.
In some embodiments, the first application system storing the first local state representation object (e.g., 523-526, 561-568 and 591) includes: storing the first local state representation object in association with an identifier of the first data synchronization instance (e.g., 541-543), and the second application system storing the second local state representation object includes: storing the second local state representation object in association with the identifier of the first data synchronization instance (e.g., 54-543). In some implementations, the first application system receives the identifier of the first data synchronization instance from at least one of: the second application system, the DSS 520, the system of the first account, and an application instruction of a first application of the first application system. In some implementations, the second application system receives the identifier of the first data synchronization instance from at least one of: the first application system, the DSS 520, the system of the first account, and an application instruction of a second application of the second application system.
In some embodiments, the first application system storing the first local state representation object includes: storing the first local state representation object (e.g., 523-526, 561-568 and 591) in association with an identifier of the first state representation object (e.g., one of 521, 522, 551-554) of the DSS 520, and the second application system storing the second local state representation object includes: storing the second local state representation object in association with the identifier of the first state representation object (e.g., one of 521, 522, 551-554) of the DSS 520.
In some implementations, the first application system receives the identifier of the first state representation object from at least one of: the second application system, the DSS 520, the system of the first account, and an application instruction of a first application of the first application system. In some implementations, the second application system receives the identifier of the first state representation object from at least one of: the first application system, the DSS 520, the system of the first account, and an application instruction of a second application of the second application system.
In some embodiments, the first application system is constructed to receive first reference state representation object update notifications provided by the DSS 520 via a push notification module (e.g., 351 of
In some implementations, the first application system is constructed to receive first reference state representation object update notifications provided by the DSS 520 via a polling module of the first application system that periodically requests first reference state representation object update notifications from the DSS, and the second application system is constructed to receive first reference state representation object update notifications provided by the DSS via a polling module of the second application system that periodically requests first reference state representation object update notifications from the DSS.
In some implementations, the DSS is external to each of the first application system and the second application system.
The method 700 of
In some embodiments, the method 700 includes: the first chat client system 511 transforming a first chat client application instruction to join a first chat channel into a first request state update (process S701); the system 511 modifying a first local application programming interface (API) state object 523 stored at the first chat client system 511 to include the first request state update (process S702); the system 511 providing the first request state update to the DSS 520 via a first local API state update notification (process S703); the second chat client system 512 transforming a second chat client application instruction to join the first chat channel into a second request state update (process S704); the system 512 modifying a second local API state object 524 stored at the second chat client system 512 to include the second request state update (process S705); the system 512 providing the second request state update to the DSS via a second local API state update notification (process S706); the DSS 520 modifying a first reference API state object 521 stored at the DSS 520 to include the first request state update (process S707); the DSS 520 providing the first request state update to the chat application server system 531 via a first reference API state update notification (process S708); the DSS 520 modifying a second reference API state object 522 stored at the DSS 520 to include the second request state update (process S709); the DSS 520 providing the second request state update to the chat application server system 531 via a second reference API state update notification (process S710); the chat application server system 531 modifying a first local API state object 525 stored at the chat application server system 531 to include the first request state update (process S711); the system 531 processing the first request state update by updating first chat channel state of the first chat channel to include a user of the first chat client application (of the system 511) as a participant of the first chat channel (process S712); the system 531 modifying the first local API state object 525 stored at the chat application server system 531 to include a first response state update that includes an identifier for a first reference chat channel state object 551, wherein the first reference chat channel state object 551 includes the first chat channel state (process S713); the system 531 providing the first response state update to the DSS 520 via a third local API state update notification (process S714); the system 531 modifying a second local API state object 526 stored at the chat application server system 531 to include the second request state update (process S715); the system 531 processing the second request state update by updating first chat channel state of the first chat channel to include a user of the second chat client application (of the system 512) as a participant of the first chat channel (process S716); the system 531 modifying the second local API state object 526 stored at the chat application server system 531 to include a second response state update that includes the identifier for the first reference chat channel state object 551 (process S717); the system 531 providing the second response state update to the DSS 520 via a fourth local API state update notification (process S718); the DSS 520 modifying the first reference API state object 521 stored at the DSS 520 to include the first response state update (process S719); the DSS 520 providing the first response state update to the first chat client system 511 via a third reference API state update notification (process S720); the DSS 520 modifying the second reference API state object 522 stored at the DSS 520 to include the second response state update (process S721); the DSS 520 providing the second response state update to the second chat client system 512 via a fourth reference API state update notification (process S722); the first chat client system 511 storing a first local chat channel state object 561 in association with the identifier for the first reference chat channel state object 551 (process S723); and the second chat client system 512 storing a second local chat channel state object 562 in association with the identifier for the first reference chat channel state object 551 (process S724). The first chat client system 511 sends a message via the first chat channel by modifying the first local chat channel state object 561 which is synchronized with the second local chat channel state object 562 via the first reference chat channel state object 551. The second chat client system 512 sends a message via the first chat channel by modifying the second local chat channel state object 562 which is synchronized with the first local chat channel state object 561 via the first reference chat channel state object 551.
In some embodiments, the first chat client system 511, the second chat client system 512, the chat application server system 531, the first reference chat channel state object 551, the first local chat channel state object 561, the second local chat channel state object 562, the first reference API state object 521, the second reference API state object 522, the first local API state object 523, the second local API state object 524, the first local API state object 525, and the a second local API state object 526 are associated with a first DSS account (e.g., “Account A”) managed by an account system of the DSS 520.
In some implementations, the DSS 520 is constructed to resolve conflicting updates to the first reference chat channel state object 551 received from the first chat client system 511 and the second chat client system 512. In some implementations, the DSS is constructed to resolve conflicting updates to the first reference chat channel state object 551 received from the first chat client system 511 and the second chat client system 512 by using a resolution system similar to the resolution system 112 of
The method 800 of
In some embodiments, the method 800 includes: the first client system 513 transforming a first application instruction of a first client application (e.g., an application similar to at least one of 161 and 162 of
In some embodiments, the first local client API state object 564 and the first local server API state object 566 are synchronized with the first reference API state object 552, and the first client system 513 and the first application server system 532 communicate by using the DSS 520. In some embodiments, the first local client API state object 564, the first reference API state object 552, and the first local server API state object 566 are associated with a first DSS account (e.g., “Account B”) of a plurality of accounts managed by an account system (not shown) of the DSS 520. In some embodiments, the first client system 513 and the first application server system 532 are systems of an account holder of the first DSS account (e.g., “Account B”).
In some implementations, the DSS 520 is external to each of the first client system 513 and the first application server system 532. In some implementations, the first client system 513 transforms the first state response update into an application callback of the first client application of the first client system 513.
5. System Architecture
Data Synchronization System
The bus 901 interfaces with the processors 901A-901N, the main memory (e.g., a random access memory (RAM)) 922, a read only memory (ROM) 904, a processor-readable storage medium 905, and a network device 911. In some implementations, the system 900 includes at least one of a display device and a user input device.
The processors 901A-901N may take many forms, such as ARM processors, X86 processors, and the like.
In some implementations, the system (e.g., 520) includes at least one of a central processing unit (processor) and a multi-processor unit (MPU).
The processors 901A-901N and the main memory 922 form a processing unit 999. In some embodiments, the processing unit includes one or more processors communicatively coupled to one or more of a RAM, ROM, and machine-readable storage medium; the one or more processors of the processing unit receive instructions stored by the one or more of a RAM, ROM, and machine-readable storage medium via a bus; and the one or more processors execute the received instructions. In some embodiments, the processing unit is an ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit). In some embodiments, the processing unit is a SoC (System-on-Chip). In some embodiments, the processing unit includes one or more data synchronization instances.
The network adapter device 911 provides one or more wired or wireless interfaces for exchanging data and commands between the system (e.g., 520) and other devices, such as an external system (e.g., 511-516, 531, 532). Such wired and wireless interfaces include, for example, a universal serial bus (USB) interface, Bluetooth interface, Wi-Fi interface, Ethernet interface, near field communication (NFC) interface, and the like.
Machine-executable instructions in software programs (such as an operating system, application programs, and device drivers) are loaded into the memory 922 (of the processing unit 999) from the processor-readable storage medium 905, the ROM 904 or any other storage location. During execution of these software programs, the respective machine-executable instructions are accessed by at least one of processors 901A-901N (of the processing unit 999) via the bus 901, and then executed by at least one of processors 901A-901N. Data used by the software programs are also stored in the memory 922, and such data is accessed by at least one of processors 901A-901N during execution of the machine-executable instructions of the software programs. The processor-readable storage medium 905 is one of (or a combination of two or more of) a hard drive, a flash drive, a DVD, a CD, an optical disk, a floppy disk, a flash storage, a solid state drive, a ROM, an EEPROM, an electronic circuit, a semiconductor memory device, and the like. The processor-readable storage medium 905 includes machine-executable instructions (and related data) for an operating system 912, software programs 913, and device drivers 914. The processor-readable storage medium 905 includes machine-executable instructions (and related data) for at least one data synchronization instance (e.g., 541-543). In some implementations, the processor-readable storage medium 905 includes instructions (and related data) for at least one of a notification module (e.g., 312 of
Application System
The bus 1001 interfaces with the processors 1001A-1001N, the main memory (e.g., a random access memory (RAM)) 1022, a read only memory (ROM) 1004, a processor-readable storage medium 1005, and a network device 1011. In some implementations, the external system includes a display device and a user input device.
The processors 1001A-1001N may take many forms, such as ARM processors, X86 processors, and the like.
In some implementations, the computing device 1000 includes at least one of a central processing unit (processor) and a multi-processor unit (MPU).
The processors 1001A-1001N and the main memory 1022 form a processing unit 1099. In some embodiments, the processing unit includes one or more processors communicatively coupled to one or more of a RAM, ROM, and machine-readable storage medium; the one or more processors of the processing unit receive instructions stored by the one or more of a RAM, ROM, and machine-readable storage medium via a bus; and the one or more processors execute the received instructions. In some embodiments, the processing unit is an ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit). In some embodiments, the processing unit is a SoC (System-on-Chip).
The network adapter device 1011 provides one or more wired or wireless interfaces for exchanging data and commands between the application system and other devices, such as the system DSS 520 of
Machine-executable instructions in software programs (such as an operating system, application programs, and device drivers) are loaded into the memory 1022 (of the processing unit 1099) from the processor-readable storage medium 1005, the ROM 1004 or any other storage location. During execution of these software programs, the respective machine-executable instructions are accessed by at least one of processors 1001A-1001N (of the processing unit 1099) via the bus 1001, and then executed by at least one of processors 1001A-1001N. Data used by the software programs are also stored in the memory 1022, and such data is accessed by at least one of processors 1001A-1001N during execution of the machine-executable instructions of the software programs. The processor-readable storage medium 1005 is one of (or a combination of two or more of) a hard drive, a flash drive, a DVD, a CD, an optical disk, a floppy disk, a flash storage, a solid state drive, a ROM, an EEPROM, an electronic circuit, a semiconductor memory device, and the like. The processor-readable storage medium 1005 includes machine-executable instructions (and related data) for an operating system 1012, software programs 1013, and device drivers 1014. In some implementations in which the application system 1000 is a client system, the processor-readable storage medium 1005 includes machine-executable instructions (and related data) for at least one of a client application, a client data synchronization module, an application layer module, an IP messaging module, an IoT device management module, a notification module, and a connectivity layer module. In some implementations in which the application system 1000 is a client system, the processor-readable storage medium 1005 includes at least one local state object.
In some implementations in which the application system 1000 is an application server system, the processor-readable storage medium 1005 includes machine-executable instructions (and related data) for at least one of a server application, a data synchronization module, a server application layer module, a notification module, and a connectivity layer module. In some implementations in which the application system 1000 is an application server system, the processor-readable storage medium 1005 includes at least one local state object.
6. Machines
The system and method of the preferred embodiment and variations thereof can be embodied and/or implemented at least in part as a machine configured to receive a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions are preferably executed by computer-executable components preferably integrated with the media intelligence platform. The computer-readable medium can be stored on any suitable computer-readable media such as RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices (CD or DVD), hard drives, floppy drives, or any suitable device. The computer-executable component is preferably a general or application specific processor, but any suitable dedicated hardware or hardware/firmware combination device can alternatively or additionally execute the instructions.
7. Conclusion
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/914,401, filed 7 May 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/154,700, filed 13 May 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/265,557, filed on 10 Dec. 2015, U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/163,270, filed on 18 May 2015, U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/161,724, filed on 14 May 2015, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/161,719, filed on 14 May 2015, all of which are incorporated in their entirety by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5274700 | Gechter et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5526416 | Dezonno et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5581608 | Jreij et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598457 | Foladare et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5867495 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5934181 | Adamczewski | Aug 1999 | A |
5978465 | Corduroy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026440 | Shrader et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034946 | Roginsky et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6094681 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6138143 | Gigliotti et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6185565 | Meubus et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192123 | Grunsted et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206564 | Adamczewski | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223287 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232979 | Shochet | May 2001 | B1 |
6269336 | Ladd et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6317137 | Rosasco | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363065 | Thornton et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373836 | Deryugin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425012 | Trovato et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426995 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430175 | Echols et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434528 | Sanders | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445694 | Swartz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445776 | Shank et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459913 | Cloutier | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6463414 | Su et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493558 | Bernhart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496500 | Nance et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501739 | Cohen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501832 | Saylor et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507875 | Mellen-Garnett et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6571245 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6574216 | Farris et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577721 | Vainio et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6600736 | Ball et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606596 | Zirngibl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614783 | Sonesh et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625258 | Ram et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625576 | Kochanski et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6636504 | Albers et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6662231 | Drosset et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6704785 | Koo et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707889 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711129 | Bauer et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711249 | Weissman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6738738 | Henton | May 2004 | B2 |
6757365 | Bogard | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765997 | Zirngibl et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768788 | Langseth et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771955 | Imura et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778653 | Kallas et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785266 | Swartz | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788768 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792086 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792093 | Barak et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798867 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807529 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807574 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819667 | Brusilovsky et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820260 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829334 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831966 | Tegan et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834265 | Balasuriya | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836537 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842767 | Partovi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850603 | Eberle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870830 | Schuster et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873952 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874084 | Dobner et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6885737 | Gao et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888929 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6895084 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6898567 | Balasuriya | May 2005 | B2 |
6912581 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6922411 | Taylor | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6928469 | Duursma et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931405 | El-shimi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937699 | Schuster et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6940953 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6941268 | Porter et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947417 | Laursen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947988 | Saleh et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961330 | Cattan et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6964012 | Zirngibl et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970915 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6977992 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981041 | Araujo et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985862 | Strom et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999576 | Sacra | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003464 | Ferrans et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006606 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010586 | Allavarpu et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020685 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7039165 | Saylor et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7058042 | Bontempi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7058181 | Wright et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062709 | Cheung | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065637 | Nanja | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7076037 | Gonen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076428 | Anastasakos et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089310 | Ellerman et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7099442 | Da Palma et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103003 | Brueckheimer et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103171 | Annadata et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7106844 | Holland | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7111163 | Haney | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7136932 | Schneider | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7140004 | Kunins et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143039 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7197331 | Anastasakos et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197461 | Eberle et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197462 | Takagi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197544 | Wang et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
D540074 | Peters | Apr 2007 | S |
7225232 | Elberse | May 2007 | B2 |
7227849 | Rasanen | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7245611 | Narasimhan et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260208 | Cavalcanti | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266181 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7269557 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272212 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272564 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277851 | Henton | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7283515 | Fowler | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7283519 | Girard | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286521 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7287248 | Adeeb | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7289453 | Riedel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296739 | Mo et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7298732 | Cho | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7298834 | Homeier et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7308085 | Weissman | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308408 | Stifelman et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7324633 | Gao et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324942 | Mahowald et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7328263 | Sadjadi | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7330463 | Bradd et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7330890 | Partovi et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7340040 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7349714 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7369865 | Gabriel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373660 | Guichard et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376223 | Taylor et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376586 | Partovi et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376733 | Connelly et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376740 | Porter et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7412525 | Cafarella et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418090 | Reding et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7428302 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440898 | Eberle et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7447299 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454459 | Kapoor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7457249 | Baldwin et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457397 | Saylor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7473872 | Takimoto | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486780 | Zirngibl et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496054 | Taylor | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496188 | Saha et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496651 | Joshi | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7500249 | Kampe et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505951 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7519359 | Chiarulli et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522711 | Stein et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7536454 | Balasuriya | May 2009 | B2 |
7542761 | Sarkar | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552054 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7571226 | Partovi et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7606868 | Le et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7613287 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7623648 | Oppenheim et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7630900 | Strom | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7631310 | Henzinger | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7644000 | Strom | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7657433 | Chang | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7657434 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668157 | Weintraub et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672275 | Yajnik et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7672295 | Andhare et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7675857 | Chesson | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7676221 | Roundtree et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685280 | Berry et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685298 | Day et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7715547 | Ibbotson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716293 | Kasuga et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7742499 | Erskine et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7779065 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809125 | Brunson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7809791 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7875836 | Imura et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882253 | Pardo-Castellote et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7920866 | Bosch et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926099 | Chakravarty et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7929562 | Petrovykh | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7936867 | Hill et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7949111 | Harlow et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962644 | Ezerzer et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7979555 | Rothstein et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992120 | Wang et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8023425 | Raleigh | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024785 | Andress et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8045689 | Provenzale et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046378 | Zhuge et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8046823 | Begen et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8069096 | Ballaro et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8078483 | Hirose et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8081744 | Sylvain | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081958 | Soderstrom et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8103725 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126128 | Hicks, III et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8126129 | Mcguire | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8130750 | Hester | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8130917 | Helbling et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8139730 | Da Palma et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145212 | Lopresti et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149716 | Ramanathan et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150918 | Edelman et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8156213 | Deng et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8165116 | Ku et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8166185 | Samuel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8169936 | Koren et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8175007 | Jain et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185619 | Maiocco et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8196133 | Kakumani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204479 | Vendrow et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214868 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8218457 | Malhotra et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233611 | Zettner | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8238533 | Blackwell et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8243889 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8249552 | Gailloux et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8266327 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8295272 | Boni et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301117 | Keast et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306021 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315198 | Corneille et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315369 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315620 | Williamson et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8319816 | Swanson et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8326805 | Arous et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8335852 | Hokimoto | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8346630 | Mckeown | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8355394 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8411669 | Chen et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8413247 | Hudis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8417817 | Jacobs | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429827 | Wetzel | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8438315 | Tao et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8462670 | Chien | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467502 | Sureka et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8477926 | Jasper et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8503639 | Reding et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8503650 | Reding et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8504818 | Rao et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8509068 | Begall et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8532686 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533857 | Tuchman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542805 | Agranovsky et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543665 | Ansari et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8547962 | Ramachandran et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8549047 | Beechuk et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565117 | Hilt et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572391 | Golan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8576712 | Sabat et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8577803 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8582450 | Robesky | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8582737 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8594626 | Woodson et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8601136 | Fahlgren et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8611338 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8613102 | Nath | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621598 | Lai et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8649268 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8656452 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8667056 | Proulx et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8675493 | Buddhikot et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8688147 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8695077 | Gerhard et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8713693 | Shanabrook et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8728656 | Takahashi et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8751801 | Harris et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8755376 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8767925 | Sureka et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781975 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8797920 | Parreira | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8806024 | Toba Francis et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8819133 | Wang | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8825746 | Ravichandran et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8837465 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838707 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8843596 | Goel et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8855271 | Brock et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8861510 | Fritz | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8879547 | Maes | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903938 | Vermeulen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918848 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924489 | Bleau et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8938053 | Cooke et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8948356 | Nowack et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8954591 | Ganesan et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8964726 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8990610 | Bostick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9014664 | Kim et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015702 | Bhat | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9031223 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9071677 | Aggarwal et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9137127 | Nowack et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9141682 | Adoc, Jr. et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9161296 | Parsons et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9177007 | Winters et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9204281 | Ramprasad et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9210275 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9231894 | Dietz | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9306982 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9307094 | Nowack et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9325624 | Malatack et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9338190 | Eng et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9344573 | Wolthuis et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9356916 | Kravitz et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9378337 | Kuhr | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9398622 | Lawson et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9456008 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9456339 | Hildner et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9460169 | Hinton et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9596274 | Lawson et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9628624 | Wolthuis et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9632875 | Raichstein et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9634995 | Binder | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9948703 | Olivier et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20010038624 | Greenberg et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043684 | Guedalia et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051996 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020006124 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006125 | Josse et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006193 | Rodenbusch et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020025819 | Cetusic et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020057777 | Saito et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064267 | Martin et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067823 | Walker et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077833 | Arons et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020126813 | Partovi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133587 | Ensel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136391 | Armstrong et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165957 | Devoe et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176378 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184361 | Eden | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198941 | Gavrilescu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006137 | Wei et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012356 | Zino et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014665 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018830 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023672 | Vaysman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026426 | Wright et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046366 | Pardikar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051037 | Sundaram et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058884 | Kallner et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059020 | Meyerson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060188 | Gidron et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061317 | Brown et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061404 | Atwal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088421 | Maes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097330 | Hillmer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097447 | Johnston | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097639 | Niyogi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103620 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123640 | Roelle et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149721 | Alfonso-nogueiro et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162506 | Toshimitsu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167333 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195950 | Huang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195990 | Greenblat et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196076 | Zabarski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204616 | Billhartz et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211842 | Kempf et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231647 | Petrovykh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233276 | Pearlman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008635 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011690 | Marfino et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040044953 | Watkins et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052349 | Creamer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040071275 | Bowater et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040101122 | Da Palma et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102182 | Reith et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117788 | Karaoguz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136324 | Steinberg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040165569 | Sweatman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172482 | Weissman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199572 | Hunt et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205101 | Radhakrishnan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205689 | Ellens et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213400 | Golitsin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216058 | Chavers et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218748 | Fisher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228469 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236696 | Aoki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240649 | Goel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005109 | Castaldi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005200 | Matenda et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010483 | Ling | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015505 | Kruis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021626 | Prajapat et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025303 | Hostetler, Jr. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038772 | Colrain | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043952 | Sharma et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047579 | Salame | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060411 | Coulombe et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083907 | Fishler | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091336 | Dehamer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091572 | Gavrilescu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108770 | Karaoguz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125251 | Berger et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125739 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128961 | Miloslavsky et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135578 | Ress et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141500 | Bhandari et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147088 | Bao et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177635 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181835 | Lau et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198292 | Duursma et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228680 | Malik | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238153 | Chevalier | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240659 | Taylor | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243977 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246176 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289222 | Sahim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008065 | Longman et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008073 | Yoshizawa et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008256 | Khedouri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015467 | Morken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021004 | Moran et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023676 | Whitmore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047666 | Bedi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067506 | Flockhart et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080415 | Tu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098624 | Morgan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129638 | Deakin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143007 | Koh et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146792 | Ramachandran et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060146802 | Baldwin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168334 | Potti et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060203979 | Jennings | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209695 | Archer, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212865 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215824 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217823 | Hussey | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217978 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060222166 | Ramakrishna et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235715 | Abrams et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256816 | Yarlagadda et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262915 | Marascio et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270386 | Yu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285489 | Francisco et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002744 | Mewhinney et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036143 | Alt et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038499 | Margulies et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043681 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050306 | McQueen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064672 | Raghav et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070906 | Thakur | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070980 | Phelps et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071223 | Lee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074174 | Thornton | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088836 | Tai et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091907 | Seshadri et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107048 | Halls et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112574 | Greene | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116191 | Bermudez et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121651 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127691 | Lert | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127703 | Siminoff | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130260 | Weintraub et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133771 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147351 | Dietrich et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149166 | Turcotte et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153711 | Dykas et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167170 | Fitchett et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192629 | Saito | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201448 | Baird et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208862 | Fox et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232284 | Mason et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239761 | Baio et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242626 | Altberg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255828 | Paradise | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265073 | Novi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286180 | Marquette et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291734 | Bhatia et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291905 | Halliday et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293200 | Roundtree et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295803 | Levine et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005275 | Overton et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025320 | Bangalore et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037715 | Prozeniuk et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080037746 | Dufrene et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040484 | Yardley | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049617 | Grice et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052395 | Wright et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080091843 | Kulkarni | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101571 | Harlow et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104348 | Kabzinski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120702 | Hokimoto | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123559 | Haviv et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134049 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080139166 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146268 | Gandhi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152101 | Griggs | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154601 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155029 | Helbling et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162482 | Ahern et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165708 | Moore et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172404 | Cohen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177883 | Hanai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192736 | Jabri et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201426 | Darcie | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209050 | Li | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212945 | Khedouri et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222656 | Lyman | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229421 | Hudis et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232574 | Baluja et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235230 | Maes | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256224 | Kaji et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275741 | Loeffen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080307436 | Hamilton | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310599 | Purnadi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313318 | Vermeulen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316931 | Qiu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317222 | Griggs et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317232 | Couse et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317233 | Rey et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090046838 | Andreasson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052437 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052641 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059894 | Jackson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063502 | Coimbatore et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074159 | Goldfarb et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075684 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083155 | Tudor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089165 | Sweeney | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089352 | Davis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089699 | Saha et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093250 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094674 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125608 | Werth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129573 | Gavan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090136011 | Goel | May 2009 | A1 |
20090170496 | Bourque | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171659 | Pearce et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171669 | Engelsma et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171752 | Galvin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182896 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193433 | Maes | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090216835 | Jain et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217293 | Wolber et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090022131 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090220057 | Waters | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090222341 | Belwadi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225748 | Taylor | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225763 | Forsberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228868 | Drukman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090232289 | Drucker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234965 | Viveganandhan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235349 | Lai et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241135 | Wong et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252159 | Lawson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288012 | Hertel et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288165 | Qiu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300194 | Ogasawara | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316687 | Kruppa | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318112 | Vasten | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100027531 | Kurashima | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037204 | Lin et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054142 | Moiso et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070424 | Monk | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071053 | Ansari et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082513 | Liu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087215 | Gu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088187 | Courtney et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088698 | Krishnamurthy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094758 | Chamberlain et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103845 | Ulupinar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107222 | Glasser | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115041 | Hawkins et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138501 | Clinton et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142516 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150139 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100167689 | Sepehri-Nik et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188979 | Thubert et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191915 | Spencer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208881 | Kawamura | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217837 | Ansari et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217982 | Brown et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232594 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250946 | Korte et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251329 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265825 | Blair et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100029191 | Sanding et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100281108 | Cohen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299437 | Moore | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312919 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332852 | Vembu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110026516 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029882 | Jaisinghani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029981 | Jaisinghani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110053555 | Cai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078278 | Cui et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110081008 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083069 | Paul et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083179 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093516 | Geng et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096673 | Stevenson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110366 | Moore et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110014981 | Koren et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110131293 | Mori | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138453 | Verma et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110143714 | Keast et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145049 | Hertel et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149950 | Petit-Huguenin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110151884 | Zhao | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158235 | Senga | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167172 | Roach et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110170505 | Rajasekar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110176537 | Lawson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179126 | Wetherell et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110211679 | Mezhibovsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110251921 | Kassaei et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110253693 | Lyons et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255675 | Jasper et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258432 | Rao et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265168 | Lucovsky et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265172 | Sharma | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267985 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274111 | Narasappa et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276892 | Jensen-Horne et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276951 | Jain | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280390 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283259 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289126 | Aikas et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289162 | Furlong et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299672 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302479 | Movida et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310902 | Xu | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313950 | Nuggehalli et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320449 | Gudlavenkatasiva | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320550 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000903 | Baarman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011274 | Moreman | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017222 | May | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023531 | Meuninck et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023544 | Li et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120027228 | Rijken et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120028602 | Lisi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036574 | Heithcock et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039202 | Song | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059709 | Lieberman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079066 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120083266 | Vanswol et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089572 | Raichstein et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120094637 | Jeyaseelan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101952 | Raleigh et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110564 | Ran et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120114112 | Rauschenberger et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120149404 | Beattie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166488 | Kaushik et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120017361 | Bleau et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120170726 | Schwartz | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120174095 | Natchadalingam et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179646 | Hinton et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179907 | Byrd et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120180021 | Byrd et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120180029 | Hill et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185561 | Klein et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198004 | Watte | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201238 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120208495 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221603 | Kothule et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226579 | Ha et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239757 | Firstenberg et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240226 | Li | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246273 | Bornstein et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254108 | Wedewer | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120254828 | Aiylam et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281536 | Gell et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288082 | Segall | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290706 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304245 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304275 | Ji et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316809 | Egolf et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120321058 | Eng et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120321070 | Smith et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130029629 | Lindholm et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031158 | Salsburg | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031613 | Shanabrook et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036476 | Roever et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047232 | Tuchman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054517 | Beechuk et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054684 | Brazier et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058262 | Parreira | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067232 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067448 | Sannidhanam et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130097298 | Ting et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110658 | Lyman | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132573 | Lindblom | May 2013 | A1 |
20130139148 | Berg et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130156024 | Burg | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166580 | Maharajh et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179942 | Caplis et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130201909 | Bosch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204786 | Mattes et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212603 | Cooke et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130244632 | Spence et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268676 | Martins et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130325934 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130328997 | Desai | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336472 | Fahlgren et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140013400 | Warshavsky et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025503 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140058806 | Guenette et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140064467 | Lawson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140072115 | Makagon et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140073291 | Hildner et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140095624 | Quan | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140095625 | Quan | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140095627 | Romagnino | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140101058 | Castel et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105372 | Nowack et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106704 | Cooke et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122600 | Kim et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140123187 | Reisman | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126715 | Lum et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129363 | Lorah et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140153565 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185490 | Holm et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140254600 | Shibata et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258481 | Lundell | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269333 | Boerjesson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274086 | Boerjesson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282473 | Saraf et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289391 | Balaji et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140304054 | Orun et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317640 | Harm et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140037251 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140355600 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372508 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372509 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140373098 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379670 | Kuhr | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150004932 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150004933 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150023251 | Giakoumelis et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026477 | Malatack et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150066865 | Yara et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150081918 | Nowack et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082378 | Collison | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150100634 | He et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119050 | Liao et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150181631 | Lee et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150189014 | Grunenberger | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150236905 | Bellan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150281294 | Nur et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150365480 | Soto et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150370788 | Bareket | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160011758 | Dornbush et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160077693 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160112475 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112521 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119291 | Zollinger et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160127254 | Kumar et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160149956 | Birnbaum et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160162172 | Rathod | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160205519 | Patel et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160226937 | Patel et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160226979 | Lancaster et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160234391 | Wolthuis et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160239770 | Batabyal et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160335074 | Olivier et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170339283 | Chaudhary et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180213028 | Olivier et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1684587 | Mar 1971 | DE |
0282126 | Sep 1988 | EP |
1464418 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1522922 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1770586 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2053869 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2134107 | Sep 1999 | ES |
10294788 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2004166000 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004220118 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2006319914 | Nov 2006 | JP |
WO-9732448 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO-2002087804 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-2006037492 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2009018489 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO-2009124223 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-2010037064 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2010040010 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2010101935 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-201 1091085 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Pravin, “Advantages of Application Server”, Dec. 15, 2009, http://data-centers.in/advantages-of-application-server/, pp. 1-4 (Year: 2009). |
“Aepona's API Monetization Platform Wins Best of 4G Awards for Mobile Cloud Enabler”, 4G World 2012 Conference & Expo, [Online]. [Accessed Nov. 5, 2015]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.realwire.com/releases/%20Aeponas-API-Monetization>, (Oct. 30, 2012), 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,700, Corrected of Allowance dated Mar. 22, 2018”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,700, Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 3, 2017”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,700, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2017”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,700, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 8, 2017”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,700, Response filed Oct. 26, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2017”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/914,401, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2019”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/914,401, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 7, 2019”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/914,401, Preliminary Amendment filed May 28, 2019”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/914,401, Response filed Sep. 16, 2019 to Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2019”, 14 pgs. |
“Archive Microsoft Office 365 Email | Retain Unified Archiving”, GWAVA, Inc., Montreal, Canada, [Online] Retrieved from the internet: <http://www.gwava.com/Retain/Retain for_Office_365.php>, (2015), 4 pgs. |
“Complaint for Patent Infringement”, Telinit Technologies, LLC v. Twilio Inc 2:12-cv-663, (Oct. 12, 2012), 17 pgs. |
“Ethernet to Token ring Bridge”, Black Box Corporation, [Online] Retrieved from the internet: <http://blackboxcanada.com/resource/files/productdetails/17044.pdf>, (Oct. 1999), 2 pgs. |
“Twilio Cloud Communications—APIs for Voice, VoIP, and Text Messaging”, Twilio, [Online] Retrieved from the internet: <http://www.twilio.com/docs/api/rest/call-feedback>, (Jun. 24, 2015), 8 pgs. |
Abu-Lebdeh, et al., “A 3GPP Evolved Packet Core-Based Architecture for QoS-Enabled Mobile Video Surveillance Applications”, 2012 Third International Conference on the Network of the Future {NOF), (Nov. 21-23, 2012), 1-6. |
Barakovic, Sabina, et al., “Survey and Challenges of QoE Management Issues in Wireless Networks”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, (2012), 1-29. |
Berners-Lee, T., “RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax”, The Internet Society, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986>, (Jan. 2005), 57 pgs. |
Kim, Hwa-Jong, et al., “In-Service Feedback QoE Framework”, 2010 Third International Conference on Communication Theory. Reliability and Quality of Service, (2010), 135-138. |
Matos, et al., “Quality of Experience-based Routing in Multi-Service Wireless Mesh Networks”, Realizing Advanced Video Optimized Wireless Networks. IEEE, (2012), 7060-7065. |
Mu, Mu, et al., “Quality Evaluation in Peer-to-Peer IPTV Services”, Data Traffic and Monitoring Analysis, LNCS 7754, 302-319, (2013), 18 pgs. |
Subramanya, et al., “Digital Signatures”, IEEE Potentials, (Mar./Apr. 2006), 5-8. |
Tran, et al., “User to User adaptive routing based on QoE”, ICNS 2011: The Seventh International Conference on Networking and Services, (2011), 170-177. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200137147 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62265557 | Dec 2015 | US | |
62163270 | May 2015 | US | |
62161724 | May 2015 | US | |
62161719 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15914401 | May 2018 | US |
Child | 16730626 | US | |
Parent | 15154700 | May 2016 | US |
Child | 15914401 | US |