The present invention relates generally to Land Mobile Radio (LMR) systems and, more specifically, to a system and method for simulating an LMR system.
Land Mobile Radio (LMR) systems are deployed by organizations requiring instant communication between geographically dispersed and mobile personnel. Typical users of LMR systems include police departments, fire departments, medical personnel, security personnel, EMS, and the military.
Current LMR systems are typically tested in a controlled testing environment before being deployed in the LMR system's intended geographical setting. Generally, the controlled testing environment requires the building and testing of equipment that is intended to be used in the field for the LMR system that is being tested. Therefore, for the testing of a typical LMR system, the controlled testing environment includes, at least, equipment for each land mobile radio site (otherwise referred to herein as a “site” or “radio site”) in the system, a network connecting all the sites, and subscriber units, or radios, to be tested on each site. The equipment for each site in the system typically includes a control channel, one or more traffic channels, a site controller, and a digital signal processing (DSP) interface. Current testing practices require the equipment for an LMR system to be built and tested. Therefore, as larger LMR systems are tested, more sites are required, and the testing becomes increasingly expensive due to the time and budget requirements involved in providing and testing additional equipment for the system.
The present disclosure provides a system and method for simulating a land mobile radio system having a plurality of radio sites. In one embodiment, the simulation system comprises an internet protocol (IP) network providing an IP-based interface between a first server designed to simulate radio sites, a second server designed to simulate one or more subscriber units, and a controller interface for providing commands for controlling the simulated subscriber units. Each site simulated by the first server includes one or more site applications each associated with an IP address, and each subscriber unit simulated by the second server is associated with a plurality of IP addresses for communicating with the site applications over the IP network.
In another embodiment, the simulation system comprises an IP network providing an IP-based interface between one or more non-simulated land mobile radio sites, a first server designed to simulate additional radio sites, a second server designed to simulate subscriber units, and a controller interface for providing commands for controlling the simulated subscriber units. Each simulated radio site of the first server includes one or more site applications each associated with an IP address, and each simulated subscriber unit of the second server is associated with a plurality of IP addresses. In this embodiment, the non-simulated land mobile radio sites communicate with non-simulated subscriber units using radio frequency (RF) communication, whereas the simulated subscriber units communicate with the simulated site applications over the IP network.
Another embodiment of the present disclosure provides a system for simulating a land mobile radio system, wherein the simulation system comprises an IP network providing an IP-based interface between one or more primary servers each designed to simulate a radio site, a secondary server designed to simulate subscriber units, and a controller interface for providing commands for controlling the simulated subscriber units. Each simulated radio site of each of the primary servers includes one or more simulated site applications each associated with an IP address, and each subscriber unit of the secondary server is associated with a plurality of IP addresses for communicating with the simulated site applications over the IP network. This embodiment may also include one or more non-simulated land mobile radio sites connected to the IP network, wherein the non-simulated land mobile radio sites communicate with non-simulated subscriber units using RF communication.
The present disclosure also provides a method for simulating the land mobile radio system by simulating radio sites connected over an IP network, associating an IP address with each of one or more site applications in communication with each radio site, associating subscriber units with at least one site application, and simulating the subscriber units communicating with the site applications over the IP network.
The present disclosure also provides a method for testing a land mobile radio system by simulating radio sites connected over an IP network, associating one or more site applications located within each radio site with an IP address, associating subscriber units with at least one site application, simulating the subscriber units communicating with the site applications over the IP network, and monitoring data packets communicated between the simulated subscriber units and the site applications. The disclosed method may be provided, for example, to test the software used to operate the land mobile radio system and/or to test the IP network capacity of the system.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of certain embodiments of the present disclosure will become further apparent from the following detailed description of the embodiments, read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The detailed description and drawings are merely illustrative of the disclosure, rather than limiting the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Embodiments are illustrated by way of example in the accompanying figures, in which like reference numbers indicate similar parts, and in which:
Prior to being deployed in the field, LMR systems are generally built and tested in a controlled testing environment such as, for example, the example testing environment 100 illustrated in
As previously stated, the sites 110 and subscriber units 135 communicate via an RF-based interface provided by the DSP interface 230. Therefore, in order to test the capacity of an LMR system using the example testing environment 100 illustrated in
In general, the NMS 310 may be provided to configure the LMR system that is to be simulated in the system 300. It should be noted that although the NMS 310 may provide data that is used when configuring the simulation system 300, configuring the LMR system may be different from configuring the simulation system 300, which may generally be performed by the controller 330, as described in greater detail below. The NMS 310 may, in one embodiment, provide configuration data for subscriber units (simulated and/or non-simulated) operating on the LMR system, as well as storage of general information used by the LMR system. Such configuration data may include, for example, subscriber unit registration data, listings of subscriber units registered with the LMR system, user group data, talk group data, mobility management data, and any other data that may be associated with a network management system for an LMR system.
The dispatch consoles 315 shown in
In accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, the site server 320 is operable to simulate one or more simulated land mobile radio sites 340, wherein each simulated site 340 comprises one or more site applications 345 each of which may be associated with an IP address. The site applications 345 are provided to simulate functionality that is typically provided by traditional, non-simulated land mobile radio sites. Examples of the simulated functionality provided by the site applications 345 may include call setup, call routing, mobility management, channel allocation, subscriber unit validation, registration, talkgroup affiliation, multicast broadcasting of voice data, etc. However, instead of using RF communication, the embodiment of the simulation system 300 illustrated in
When reference is made to the site applications illustrated in
The subscriber unit server 325 simulates subscriber units 350 for communicating over the IP network 305 with the site applications 345 located in a simulated site 340 on the site server 320. In general, any number of subscriber units 350 may be generated by the subscriber unit server 325, wherein each subscriber unit 350 corresponds to one or more IP addresses to allow for communication over the IP network 305. Because the IP network 305 provides an IP-based interface between the components of the system 300, communication between components such as, for example, simulated subscriber units 350 and site applications 345, may be provided by transmitting and receiving data to and from the IP addresses associated with the communicating components.
In one example illustrating communication between components of the system 300, a first simulated subscriber unit 350 initiates a group call, and the subscriber unit server 325 simulates a push-to-talk (PTT) request originating from the first simulated subscriber unit 350 initiating the call. The PTT request is sent over the IP network 305 to the site server 320 where it is received at the control channel application 345A of the simulated site 340 for which the first simulated subscriber unit 350 is registered. The control channel 345A then performs typical call setup functions performed by traditional, non-simulated LMR sites.
Examples of call setup functions performed by traditional, non-simulated LMR sites may include those provided in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 13/174,507 and 13/210,211, entitled “System and Method for Providing Mobility Management and Out-of-Coverage Indication in a Conventional Land Mobile Radio System,” and “Hybrid Land Mobile Radio System Incorporating Mobility Management and Out-of-Coverage Indication,” respectively, both hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes, wherein, as mentioned above, components identified by an RF or physical location in traditional, non-simulated LMR systems are identified by an IP address in the system 300 provided by the present disclosure. For example, in response to the PTT request, the control channel application 345A may request validation of the first simulated subscriber unit 350 from the site controller application 345B as well as allocation of a traffic channel 345C to conduct the call.
Additionally, the control channel 345A may receive information that may identify the IP addresses of the site controller applications 345B of the simulated sites 340 at which other simulated subscriber units 350 affiliated with the talkgroup of the call are registered. The control channel 345A may then transmit information identifying the IP addresses of the site controllers 345B as well as the IP address of the traffic channel 345C allocated by the site controller 345B over the IP network 305 to the first simulated subscriber unit 350 initiating the call.
In accordance with the current example, when the first simulated subscriber unit 350 receives, from the control channel 345A, information identifying the IP address of the traffic channel 345C, the subscriber unit server 325 transmits call data (e.g., voice packets, or voice data) over the IP network 305 to the traffic channel 345C allocated by the site controller 345B. The traffic channel 345C allocated to conduct the call from the first subscriber unit 350 then transmits the call data to the site controllers 345B of the sites 340 with which the other simulated subscriber units 350 affiliated with the talkgroup of the call are registered. Finally, the simulated site 340 transmits the call data over the IP network 305 to the simulated subscriber units 350 receiving the call, where it is received at each respective simulated subscriber unit 350 registered with the talkgroup of the call. It should be understood that, in some embodiments, the subscriber unit server 325 may directly transmit call data over the IP network 305 to the site controllers 345B of the sites 340 at which other simulated subscriber units 350 affiliated with the talkgroup of the call are registered.
The above example is provided to illustrate communication between components of the system 300. Although the above example illustrates communication using call data, it should be appreciated that any type of data may be communicated using the simulation system 300 including, for example, mobility data, registration data, location data, global positioning system (GPS) information, or any other data transmitted by a radio unit. It should be understood that the tasks performed by the applications 345 may be simulated by the site server 320. Similarly, tasks performed by subscriber units 350 may be simulated by the subscriber unit server 325. In accordance with the present disclosure, it should be understood that a component in the system 300 may simulate a task, feature, system, application, etc. . . . by generating and/or running code designed to execute the simulated task, feature, system, application, etc. Additionally, as used in the present disclosure, it should be understood that a traditional, non-simulated LMR system includes not only trunking LMR systems, but also hybrid LMR systems.
Components in the present disclosure may provide functionality similar to that provided by their counterparts located in a traditional, non-simulated LMR system, except that the components in the present disclosure that are typically identified by an RF or physical location in traditional, non-simulated LMR systems are now identified by an IP address in the system provided by the present disclosure. For example, a control channel application may be operable to communicate one or more control channel messages in accordance with Telecommunications Industry Association standards such as, for example, TIA-102.AABC. Examples of such control channel messages may include: call set-up, registration and talkgroup affiliation, RFSS status, network status, radio control, adjacent site information and registration, affiliation, and deregulation responses.
Referring again to
In some embodiments, the system 500 may be used to test the capacity of a pre-existing LMR system implementing non-simulated LMR sites 510 by adapting the pre-existing LMR system to incorporate the system 500 illustrated in
The figures and accompanying text are provided herein to disclose one or more aspects or embodiments and/or to provide one or more examples of one or more systems and methods for simulating an LMR system. The simulation systems may be implemented in a controlled testing environment, or even in an existing LMR system, to provide efficient, dynamic testing of an LMR system. The examples and example embodiments provided herein are not intended to limit the scope or spirit of the present disclosure as defined in the claims provided below.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/278,641, entitled “System and Method for Simulating a Land Mobile Radio System,” filed Oct. 21, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/405,618, entitled “System and Method for Simulating a Land Mobile Radio System,” filed Oct. 21, 2010, all of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4870408 | Zdunek et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5214789 | George | May 1993 | A |
5293638 | Sasuta et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5420909 | Ng et al. | May 1995 | A |
5594940 | Peterson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5850444 | Rune | Dec 1998 | A |
5901341 | Moon et al. | May 1999 | A |
6028846 | Cain | Feb 2000 | A |
6119010 | Labedz | Sep 2000 | A |
6134514 | Liu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134515 | Skogby | Oct 2000 | A |
6141347 | Shaughnessy et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6199032 | Anderson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6336035 | Somoza et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6374115 | Barnes et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6545995 | Kinnunen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571082 | Rahman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6618696 | Dean et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6744746 | Bartelme | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754224 | Murphy | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6771703 | Oguz et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6771966 | Chow | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6813593 | Berger | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6822947 | Sawyer et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6898188 | Hamami | May 2005 | B1 |
6934555 | Silva et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940838 | Stead | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6941457 | Gundavelli et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6985735 | Gustafsson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996510 | Reilly et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006467 | Anton, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7035643 | Slawitschka et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7056217 | Pelkey et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7075893 | Mlinarsky et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7080147 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7113791 | Lepschy et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120432 | Voyer | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133679 | Zhu | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7184790 | Dorenbosch et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7218620 | Lee | May 2007 | B2 |
7221660 | Simonson et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7231330 | Hernandez-Mondragon et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236779 | Lahav et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7246055 | Singh | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7251456 | Chiu | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263471 | Barbaresi et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7277395 | Rosen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7308268 | Barbosa da Torre et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7324588 | Green et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7379740 | Da Torre et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7386435 | Sutinen et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7403779 | De Cambray-Mathan | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7433692 | De Santis et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7486636 | Francalanci et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7564805 | Cortez et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7596377 | Barberis et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7636339 | Shaffer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639988 | Abusch-Magder et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7664846 | Tiruthani | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672669 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698121 | Steenkiste et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7729287 | Griffiths | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7738407 | Chow et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747248 | Escott | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747249 | Guo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760660 | Conway | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7764633 | Marque-Pucheu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765093 | Li et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770068 | Drees | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783463 | Herro | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7796983 | Pao et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809659 | Paiz | Oct 2010 | B1 |
D636361 | Frandsen et al. | Apr 2011 | S |
7929475 | Simonson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7970425 | Balachandran et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8059574 | Roy et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8160076 | Aggarwal et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8255684 | Benshetler et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8352223 | Anthony | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8483114 | Roy et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8694774 | Benshetler et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9148421 | Benshetler et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9252982 | Jobe et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9516475 | Roy et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9763260 | Bane et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9774386 | Roy et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9800460 | Roy et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20010010689 | Awater et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020114302 | McDonald et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020155839 | Nisbet | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030016834 | Blanco et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030058858 | Berlyoung et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063569 | Kalliokulju et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086405 | Silva et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095510 | Dorenbsoch | May 2003 | A1 |
20040070515 | Burkley et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040132453 | Gabriel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040170149 | Lee | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040214577 | Borst et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214583 | Graham et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050165919 | Qian et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174986 | Emond et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050180448 | Kobayashi | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198359 | Basani et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050233751 | Bardwell | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267928 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281208 | Dorenbosch et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282590 | Haparnas | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060140125 | Ottinger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060160562 | Davis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060205398 | Seckendorf | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060211443 | Wegman | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217120 | Annunziato et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217122 | Levit et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060240814 | Cutler | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060262800 | Martinez et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274659 | Ouderkirk | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282247 | Brennan et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070014263 | Ferrato et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019769 | Green | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070061442 | Kan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072619 | Wei et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104121 | Shaffer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070147296 | Barbaresi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147357 | Pelletier et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070160181 | Barbaresi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070242670 | Simonson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070259692 | Venkatachalam | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263597 | Morinaga et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263798 | Dewing et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070293159 | Etelapera | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080056466 | Nishimura | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080076425 | Khetawat et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080114239 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123650 | Bhaskar | May 2008 | A1 |
20080144644 | Allan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161006 | Ferrato et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080270098 | Sarkkinen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080293402 | Rajan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090024845 | Benshetler et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028059 | Barbaresi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090052339 | Spring et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090112569 | Angus | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090140949 | Stratis et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175209 | Roy et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185502 | Sung et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090254330 | Goria | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090305709 | Panico et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100020735 | Roy et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100035619 | Panico et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100105399 | Akerlund | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100141565 | Frandsen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162036 | Linden et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169446 | Linden et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100178925 | Bernini et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100227583 | Roy | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100232299 | Conway | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100303033 | Shahar et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110034170 | Zhong et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120002588 | Roy et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120035904 | Seckendorf | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039201 | Roy et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120083307 | Roy et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102097 | Jobe et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120331289 | Benshetler et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130072165 | Rondeau et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130114493 | Olivier | May 2013 | A1 |
20130165134 | Touag et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130215819 | Ji et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130294323 | Roy et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130337822 | Rubin et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140195801 | Benshetler et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140273916 | Roy et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140357234 | Sullivan | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150057040 | Kuehner | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150326471 | Anandan et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160014818 | Reitsma et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036624 | Roy et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160100294 | Ruelke et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160135207 | Bane et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20170311336 | Bane et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180054350 | Roy et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4434372 | Mar 1996 | DE |
10104926 | Nov 2001 | DE |
10061550 | Jun 2002 | DE |
102007008196 | Aug 2008 | DE |
1317158 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1335617 | Aug 2003 | EP |
1534032 | May 2005 | EP |
1534033 | May 2005 | EP |
2136582 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2427796 | Jan 2007 | GB |
WO-99052314 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO-2005006798 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO-2007060808 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007078467 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007136270 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008014818 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO-2008064706 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2008151464 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2009069507 | Jun 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 22, 2015 of U.S. Appl. No. 13/278,641. |
Response to Advisory Action dated Feb. 9, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/278,641. |
Advisory Action and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary, dated Jan. 29, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/278,641. |
Response to Final Office Action, dated Jan. 5, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/278,641. |
Final Office Action, dated Oct. 8, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/278,641. |
Response to Office Action, dated Sep. 18, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/278,641. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 22, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/278,641. |
Alcober, J. et al., “Multi-site Model and Simulation of Trunking Systems,” 5th IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications, 1996, pp. 236-239, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona. |
Baker, D. et al., “The Design and Simulation of a Mobile Radio Network with Distributed Control,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Jan. 1984, pp. 226-237, vol. 2, Issue 1. |
Chiani, M. et al., “A Semi-Analytical Approach for Performance Evaluation of TCP-IP Based Mobile Radio Links,” Proceedings of Global Telecommunications Conference, 2000, pp. 937-942, vol. 2, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ. |
Chrapkowski, A. et al., “Mobile Trunked Radio System Design and Simulation,” 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 1991, pp. 245-250, IEEE, New York, NY. |
D'Aria, G. et al., “Simulation and Performance of the Pan-European Land Mobile Radio System,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, May 1992, pp. 177-189, vol. 41, Issue 2, IEEE. |
Farrell, T.C., et al., “A Computer Simulation Analysis of Conventional and Trunked Land Mobile Radio for a System with a Small Number of User Groups,” Military Communications Conference, Oct. 15-18, 1989, pp. 923-927, vol. 3. |
Gladstone, K.J. et al., “Computer Simulation of Multipath Fading in the Land Mobile Radio Environment,” Electronic Circuits and Systems, IEE Proceedings, Pt. G., Dec. 1980, pp. 323-330, vol. 127, Issue 6. |
Harada, H. et al., “Simulation and Software Radio for Mobile Communications,” book, 2002, pp. 335-364. |
Liebl, G. et al., “A Real-Time Simulation Environment for IP-Traffic Over Cellular Links,” 6th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics Proceedings, 2002, pp. 1-6, vol. 4. |
Liu, W. et al., “Parallel Simulation Environment for Mobile Wireless Networks,” Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference, 1996, pp. 605-612, Coronado, CA. |
Loo, C., “A Statistical Model for a Land Mobile Satellite Link,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Aug. 1985, pp. 122-127, vol. 34, Issue 3, IEEE Vehicular Technology Society. |
Nehme, G. et al., “A Simulation Study of High-Capacity Cellular Land-Mobile Radio-Communication Systems,” Can. Elec. Eng. Journal, Jan. 1982, pp. 36-39, vol. 7, Issue 1, EIC, Canada. |
Onoe, Y. et al., “Cooperation of Multiple Simulators for Mobile IP Networks,” 17th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, AINA 2003, pp. 367-372, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ. |
Patzold, M. et al., “A Deterministic Digital Simulation Model for Suzuki Processes with Application to a Shadowed Rayleigh Land Mobile Radio Channel,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, May 1996, pp. 318-331, vol. 45, No. 2, IEEE. |
Perennou, T. et al., “Two-Stage Wireless Network Emulation,” Broadband Satellite Communication Systems and the Challenges of Mobility, 2005, pp. 181-190, vol. 169, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. |
Prasad, M.V. et al., “A Comparison of Land Mobile Radio Prediction Methods in Indian Rural Zones,” IEEE International Conference on Personal Wireless Communications, 2005, pp. 217-219, IEEE. |
Short, J. et al., “Mobile Wireless Network System Simulation,” Wireless Networks, 1995, pp. 451-467, vol. 1, Issue 4, J.C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers. |
Simon, G. et al., “Simulation-based Optimization of Communication Protocols for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks,” 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 2003, pp. 1-8, IEEE. |
Smith, J. I., “A Computer Generated Multipath Fading Simulation for Mobile Radio,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Aug. 1975, pp. 39-40, vol. 24, Issue 3, IEEE. |
Zeng, X. et al., “GloMoSim: A Library for Parallel Simulation of Large-scale Wireless Networks,” Parallel and Distributed Simulation, 1998, pp. 154-161, Dept of Computer Science, Los Angeles, CA. |
Zhi-Yong, S. et al., “Design and Simulation of Trunking Communication System in TD-SCDMA Network Based on SIP Protocol,” 2009 International Symposium on Information Engineering and Electronic Commerce, May 2009, pp. 481-485, IEEE. |
Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) with Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA), TIA/EIA Standard: Project 25—Trunking Control Channel Messages New Technology Standards Project Digital Radio Technical Standards (ANSI/TIA/EIA-102.AABC), May 2000, Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA), Arlington, VA (150 pages). |
Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) with Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA), TIA/EIA Standard: Project 25—Trunking Control Channel Messages, Addendum 1, SNDCP Trunking Control Channel Messages (ANSI/TIA/EIA-102.AABC-1), Sep. 2001, Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA), Arlington, VA (11 pages). |
Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) with Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA), TIA Standard: Project 25—Trunking Control Channel Messages, Addendum 2 Multiband Operations, New Technology Standards Project Digital Radio Technical Standards (ANSI/TIA-102.AABC-2), Dec. 2002, Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA), Arlington, VA (39 pages). |
Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) with Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA), TIA/EIA Telecommunications Systems Bulletin, APCO Project 25—Trunking Overview (TSB102.AABA), Apr. 1995, Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA), Arlington, VA (12 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/950,868, filed Jul. 19, 2007; first-named inventor: Benshetler. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/950,870, filed Jul. 19, 2007; first-named inventor: Benshetler. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/963,131, filed Aug. 2, 2007; first-named inventor: Benshetler. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/790,588, filed Mar. 15, 2013; first-named inventor: Arindam Roy. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/076,473, filed Nov. 6, 2014; first-named inventor: Bane. |
Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,963 (15 pages). |
1st Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 4, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,963 (5 pages). |
2nd Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 1, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,963 (7 pages). |
Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/940,936 (12 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/940,936 (16 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,895. |
Response to Non-Final Office Action, dated Dec. 19, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,895. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 12, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,895. |
Office Action dated May 20, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,981. |
Response to Office Action, dated Oct. 21, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,981. |
Terminal Disclaimer dated Oct. 21, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,981. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 19, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,981. |
Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/937,005. |
Response to Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/937,005. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/937,005. |
Response to Final Office Action, dated Nov. 16, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/937,005. |
Terminal Disclaimer dated Dec. 2, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/937,005. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/937,005. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 19, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/937,005. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 29, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/937,005. |
Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,812. |
Response to Office Action, dated Apr. 8, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,812. |
Terminal Disclaimer dated Apr. 8, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,812. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 26, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,812. |
Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,150. |
Response to Office Action, dated Mar. 31, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,150. |
Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,150. |
Response to Office Action, dated Oct. 11, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,150. |
Response to Advisory Action, dated Oct. 31, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,150. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 14, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,150. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 11, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,150. |
Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/815,095. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 21, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/815,095. |
Preliminary Amendment dated May 10, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/935,270. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 4, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/935,270. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 15/494,391, filed Apr. 21, 2017; first-named inventor: Arindam Roy. |
Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/494,391. |
Response to Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/494,391, filed Sep. 5, 2017. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 15/641,747, filed Jul. 5, 2017; first-named inventor: Bane. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/641,747, Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2017. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 15/786,476, filed Oct. 17, 2017, first-named inventor: Roy. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/786,476, Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/494,391, filed Apr. 21, 2017, Distributed Simulcast Architecture. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/641,747, filed Jul. 5, 2017, System and Method for Dynamic Channel Allocation. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/786,476, filed Oct. 17, 2017, Interoperability Gateway for Land Mobile Radio System. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/494,391, Final Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2017, 23 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/494,391, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2018, 12 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160112882 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61405618 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13278641 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 14979007 | US |