1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates generally to monitoring and control of metering systems. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to systems and methods for simultaneous communications on Modbus and DNP 3.0 over Ethernet for an electronic power meter.
2. Description of the Related Art
The metering architecture that exists in the power utility field today is geared toward providing enough information to accurately monitor and control a variety of metering devices installed at numerous substations. To achieve these objectives, it is essential that communication between a central utility station and substations be time- and cost-efficient, quick updating, as well as reliable.
Historically, meters measuring electrical energy have used measurement devices, which mechanically monitor the subscriber's usage and display a reading of the usage at the meter itself. Consequently, the reading of these meters has required that human meter readers physically go to the site of the meter and manually document the readings. Clearly, this approach relies very heavily on human intervention and, thus, is very costly, time-consuming, and prone to human error. As the number of meters in a typical utility's service region has increased, in some cases into the millions, human meter reading has become prohibitive in terms of time and money.
Over time, these conventional meters were made using microprocessor technologies, which enabled them to be read using a serial protocol and interface. This enabled the meters to be used in series to obtain readings back at a remote terminal unit (RTU) for remote SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) interrogation. For example,
Realization of such communication may be accomplished by a standard open protocol known as DNP 3.0. This protocol is configured to provide the power utility with a serial language to speak to the substations and to allow the utility to use outage detection software, generically labeled in the industry as SCADA. In other words, communication between each of the meters and, for example, a central station is realized through a respective serial port and is thus limited to a respective pair coupled to one another via a dedicated channel. DNP 3.0 is optimized for a round-robin type disturbance awareness response.
Furthermore, utility companies communicate to metering and data telemetry devices in substations using different serial based protocols. Different departments within a given utility company have standardized on different protocols which are optimized for the applications they have. For instance, while SCADA systems operate at peak performance using the DNP 3.0 protocol, this protocol is inefficient and difficult to manage when applied to metering departments, system planning, and estimation and power plant DCS systems. As products became more sophisticated, these differing departments wanted to obtain data from one instrument that gave them all the needed disturbance and recorded data. To date, these various departments have had to install separate equipment in substations, separate serial channels, and a variety of protocols to access the data of the monitoring instrument. This is often a costly endeavor, thus a need exists for a system for simultaneously communicating in a plurality of protocols between a monitoring instrument and the various departments in a central utility station. Furthermore, there has been a desire in the industry to eliminate serial protocols and channels and have the various data transmitted over LANs (local area networks) using dedicated T1 or frame relay networks.
The above and other aspects are attained by a metering apparatus and system for monitoring and controlling a plurality of metering devices in the field of energy use/control.
In accordance with one aspect of the disclosure, a system is provided for simultaneous communications between a host device and a plurality of applications using multiple industry standard communications protocols. The system includes a means for receiving a data packet over an Ethernet connection via an Ethernet card. The data packet is transmitted using a first protocol. This transmission is accomplished by enclosing the data packet with an Ethernet protocol wrapper. A means for removing the Ethernet protocol wrapper is also included, along with a means for determining a secondary protocol used by the data packet. Additionally, the disclosed system has a means for routing the data packet according to predetermined paths selected based on the secondary protocol and a means for providing a response packet using the secondary protocol of the data packet. Further, the system utilizes a means for appending an Ethernet protocol wrapper to the response packet and a means for transmitting the response packet over the Ethernet connection.
In accordance with another aspect of the disclosure, a method for providing simultaneous communications between a host device and a plurality of applications using multiple industry standard communications protocols is provided. The method begins with receiving a data packet over an Ethernet connection via an Ethernet card, the data packet having an Ethernet protocol wrapper. The Ethernet protocol wrapper is removed. A secondary protocol, used by the data packet, is determined. The data packet is then routed according to predetermined paths selected based on the secondary protocol. Upon completing its predetermined path, a response packet using the secondary protocol of the data packet is provided. An Ethernet protocol wrapper is appended to the response packet, and the response packet is finally transmitted over the Ethernet connection.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the disclosure, a metering device is configured with an IED COM processor, operative to perform multiple tasks, and an IED Network Adapter or card built in the metering device and coupled to the processor. The card is configured to format and send data from the processor using DNP 3.0 protocol via an open socket into Ethernet TCP/IP.
According to a further aspect of the disclosure, a plurality of substations, each of which is provided with at least one metering device of the disclosure, are coupled together in a system capable of transmitting the data from each substation to either the RTU and further to the SCADA master or directly to the latter without using a dedicated serial cable or channel.
Still a further aspect of the disclosure is concerned with a system configured to provide communication between a local area network including a plurality of the metering devices of the disclosure and the Internet.
In another aspect, an electric power meter providing real time revenue calculations as well as power quality metering is provided. The power meter actively updates a number of users over the Internet in real time. A user can be utility personnel or customers. The power meter is also capable of communicating through several ports using several different communication protocols simultaneously. The interfaces, including web pages, are user definable and configurable. The meter is installable as a socket type meter, a panel mounted meter, a switchboard mounted meter, or a circuit breaker meter.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, a web server provides real time data through an Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) or Extensible Markup Language (XML) interface. Additionally, the web server allows viewing of stored historical and power quality data and provides users with an interface for retrieval of historical data via industry standard protocols including Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) and File Transfer Protocol (FTP).
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, the web server operates as a Modbus Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) Gateway for the power meter and existing serial based devices that connect through a network serial port to allow data be monitored or transferred via a network infrastructure.
In a further embodiment of the present disclosure, a socket-type electric power meter provides concurrent operation of a web server, Modbus TCP and additional protocols which are supported by the power meter, thus allowing the power meter to be easily incorporated into existing power control systems as well as providing access to real-time web information, such as the revenue calculations, metering data and power quality data, using a standard web browser.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings wherein:
Referring to
The IEMD 10 includes an IED COM processor 12 (
As illustrated in
More specifically, the card 14 recognizes DNP by identifying an Internet Protocol (TCP, UDP, etc.). After retrieving the DNP data, the card 14 sends this data to the processor 12 over a serial channel. For this serial communication, the card 14 and the processor 12 use a predetermined protocol for faster data transfer. The predetermined protocol is only used internally between the card 14 and the processor 12. Accordingly, this protocol has its own headers and footers.
In the protocol, the DNP response is transferred to the card 14 through the serial message. When the card 14 receives this message, the DNP response is prepared with TCP/IP Header for Ethernet medium. A flow diagram illustrating this procedure is illustrated in
Referring to
Accordingly, utilizing the inventive IEMD device, which is provided with the card 14, allows the generated data to be transmitted over the LAN to either the RTU 18 (
Accordingly, the inventive device 10 provides significantly higher speed outputs and eliminates the need for dedicated serial channels or dedicated wiring. Further, using the TCP/IP technology enables the metering devices to communicate, and also enables them to simultaneously communicate through more than one channel. As a result, readings can be brought back to the SCADA while other software packages can be used to interrogate the metering devices for other purposes, e.g., remote fault interrogation.
In accordance with a further embodiment of the disclosure, the inventive device 10 enables the power Utility to transmit the data via the Internet. As illustrated in
As shown in
The method of the present embodiment begins with step 501 wherein a data packet is received by an Ethernet card 14 (
If the data packet is using the Modbus protocol, the method proceeds to step 504, wherein the data packet is sent to the host device, in this case the power meter 10. In the power meter 10, the data packet is parsed and a response is prepared using the Modbus protocol, in step 505. The response packet is forwarded to the Ethernet card 14, an Ethernet wrapper is appended, and the wrapped response packet is transmitted over a connected Ethernet network 16 in step 506. The method then loops back to step 501 to await receipt of the next data packet.
Alternatively, if the data packet is determined to be using DNP (Distributed Network Protocol) in step 503, the Ethernet card 14 strips the Ethernet wrapper and a Modbus wrapper is appended to the DNP data packet in step 507. Subsequently, in step 508, the Modbus wrapped data packet is transferred to the power meter. In step 509, the Modbus wrapper is removed. The remaining DNP packet is parsed in step 510 and a response is prepared using DNP in step 511. A Modbus wrapper is appended to the response packet, in step 512, and the wrapped response packet is then relayed to the Ethernet card in step 513. In step 514, the Modbus wrapper is removed from the response packet. The method then proceeds to step 506 and continues as described above.
The present embodiment allows interoperability with multiple software systems using different communication protocols simultaneously. Having the host device and Ethernet card communicate via a serial channel allows both DNP and Modbus packets to be transferred to the host without corruption or conflict. Arbitration and high-speed protocol switching, which could negatively affect performance, is not required. Using the methods and systems of the disclosure, connections to 12 systems using different protocols can be maintained simultaneously over an Ethernet connection.
A web server program (web server) is contained in memory 620, and accessed through network interface 622. The web server provides real time data through any known web server interface format. For example, popular web server interface formats consist of HTML and XML formats. The actual format of the programming language used is not essential to the present invention, in that any web server format can be incorporated herein. The web server provides a user friendly interface for the user to interact with the meter 110. The user can have various access levels to enter limits for e-mail alarms. Additionally, the user can be provided the data in a multiple of formats including raw data, bar graph, charts, etc. The currently used HTML or XML programming languages provide for easy programming and user friendly user interfaces.
The operation of the device of
In one embodiment of the present invention, network interface 622 is an Ethernet interface that supports, for example, 100 base-T or 10 base-T communications. This type of network interface can send and receive data packets between WAN connections and/or LAN connections and the meter 610. This type of network interface allows for situations, for example, where the web server may be accessed by one user while another user is communicating via the Modbus TCP, and a third user may be downloading a stored data file via FTP. The ability to provide access to the meter by multiple users, simultaneously, is a great advantage over the prior art. This can allow for a utility company's customer service personnel, a customer and maintenance personnel to simultaneously and interactively monitor and diagnose possible problems with the power service.
Referring again to
As the processor receives packets of data it identifies the network processing necessary for the packet by the port number associated with the packet. The processor allocates the packet to a task as a function of the port number. Since each task is running independently the meter 610 can accept different types of requests concurrently and process them transparently from each other. For example, the web server may be accessed by one user while another user is communicating via Modbus TCP and at the same time a third user may download a log file via FTP.
The Network to Meter Protocol Conversion Function 636 is used to format and protocol convert the different network protocol messages to a common format understood by the other functional sections of meter 610. After the basic network processing of the packet of data, any “commands” or data which are to be passed to other functional sections of meter 610 are formatted and protocol converted to a common format for processing by the Network to Meter Protocol Conversion Function 636. Similarly, commands or data coming from the meter for transfer over the network are pre-processed by this function into the proper format before being sent to the appropriate network task for transmission over the network. In addition this function first protocol converts and then routes data and commands between the meter and external devices.
The described embodiments of the present disclosure are intended to be illustrative rather than restrictive, and are not intended to represent every embodiment of the present disclosure. Various modifications and variations can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure as set forth in the following claims both literally and in equivalents recognized in law.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/087,438 filed on Mar. 23, 2005, which a continuation-in-part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/969,592 filed on Oct. 20, 2004 by Kagan et al. entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN INTELLIGENT ELECTRONIC DEVICES VIA AN OPEN CHANNEL”, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. In addition, the present application claims priority to a U.S. provisional patent application filed on Oct. 12, 2004 and assigned Application Ser. No. 60/617,689, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5650936 | Loucks et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5736847 | Van Doorn et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5796742 | Klotzbach et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5828576 | Loucks et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5995911 | Hart | Nov 1999 | A |
6000034 | Lightbody et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005759 | Hart et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
D427533 | Cowan et al. | Jul 2000 | S |
D429655 | Cowan et al. | Aug 2000 | S |
D435471 | Simbeck et al. | Dec 2000 | S |
6185508 | Van Doorn et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6186842 | Hirschbold et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
D439535 | Cowan et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
6236949 | Hart | May 2001 | B1 |
D443541 | Hancock et al. | Jun 2001 | S |
6397155 | Przydatek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
D458863 | Harding et al. | Jun 2002 | S |
D459259 | Harding et al. | Jun 2002 | S |
6493644 | Jonker et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6563697 | Simbeck et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567404 | Wilford | May 2003 | B1 |
6578084 | Moberg et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6611773 | Przydatek et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611922 | Ozcetin et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615147 | Jonker et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636030 | Rose et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6671635 | Forth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671654 | Forth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687627 | Gunn et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694270 | Hart | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6735535 | Kagan et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6737855 | Huber et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745138 | Przydatek et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751562 | Blackett et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751563 | Spanier et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6792337 | Blackett et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6792364 | Jonker et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798190 | Harding et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798191 | Macfarlane et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6813571 | Lightbody et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825776 | Lightbody et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6853978 | Forth et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871150 | Huber et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
D505087 | Ricci et al. | May 2005 | S |
6894979 | Lee | May 2005 | B1 |
6944555 | Blackett et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957158 | Hancock et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961641 | Forth et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6983211 | Cowan et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988025 | Ransom et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988182 | Teachman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990121 | Stiles et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990395 | Ransom et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006934 | Jonker et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010438 | Hancock et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7072779 | Hancock et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085824 | Forth et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089089 | Cumming et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7127328 | Ransom | Oct 2006 | B2 |
D532747 | Ricci et al. | Nov 2006 | S |
7136384 | Wang | Nov 2006 | B1 |
D534120 | Ricci et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
7155350 | Kagan | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7158050 | Lightbody et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174258 | Hart | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7174261 | Gunn et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7256709 | Kagan | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262709 | Borleske et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7294997 | Kagan | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304586 | Wang et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7609719 | Kagan et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616656 | Wang et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20020114326 | Mahalingaiah | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020162014 | Przydatek et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165677 | Lightbody et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169570 | Spanier et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191640 | Haymes et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014200 | Jonker et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030065459 | Huber et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076242 | Burns et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030101008 | Hart | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105608 | Hart | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030132742 | Harding et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147420 | Beckwith | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154471 | Teachman et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030210699 | Holt et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212512 | Hart | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220752 | Hart | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040037313 | Gulati et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040066311 | Giles et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040138786 | Blackett et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138787 | Ransom et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138835 | Ransom et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172207 | Hancock et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183522 | Gunn et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040229578 | Lightbody et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050002417 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017874 | Lightbody et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027464 | Jonker et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071106 | Huber et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050256964 | Dube | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050275397 | Lightbody et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288876 | Doig et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288877 | Doig et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060052958 | Hancock et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071813 | Kagan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077999 | Kagan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060170409 | Kagan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187956 | Doviak et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060230394 | Forth et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271244 | Cumming et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080154523 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100046545 | Kagan et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100046545 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60617689 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11087438 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 12605682 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10969592 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 11087438 | US |