Patent Application
20140180963
The instant application claims priority to Indian Patent Application Serial No. 3578/MUM/2012, filed Dec. 21, 2012, pending, the entire specification of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates generally to electronic procurement and more particularly to procurement performance analysis including a system and method for spend analysis by providing strategies for mining spend information.
Procurement professionals always look for an opportunity to save money as well as to achieve compliance while purchasing goods/services. Most of the time, this saving and compliance opportunity lies within their organization and can be identified from their spend data. Major challenges in finding this opportunity are the huge volume of spend data and unavailability of standard strategy across organization.
Accordingly, there exists a need for new and improved procurement analysis systems and methods for spend analysis that overcomes at least one of the aforementioned problems.
In accordance with the general teachings of the present invention, a system and method is provided for spend analysis by providing strategies for mining spend information. The present invention is based on standard category and supplier based saving strategies. It further creates business constraints for data analysis. It also helps in compliance based strategies.
An object of the present invention is to provide a system and method for spend analysis by providing strategies for mining spend information.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a system and method for analyzing classified spend data based on pre-determined strategies to find a saving and compliance opportunity across category and supplier.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a system and method for analyzing classified spend data based on pre-determined saving and compliance strategies in relation to payment terms of the supplier.
The present invention introduces a system for spend analysis by providing strategies for mining spend information.
The system includes:
a processor unit; and
a computer readable medium storing instructions executable by the processor unit comprising:
an input system adapted for entering pre-defined parameters, including but not limited to information of spend data, category of spend data, information of supplier, payment term, type of contract, contract term, other parameters and business constraints, and combinations thereof;
a strategy selection system to select a spend analysis strategy from a spend analysis strategy system, adapted for analyzing classified spend data based on pre-determined savings and compliance strategies;
a category/supplier display system to display categories/suppliers for user-defined spend data that match the default/user-defined business constraints;
wherein the category/supplier display system is integrated with a classification system adapted for classifying spend data based on pre-defined parameters; and
an output system adapted for displaying output for a strategy selected for a specific parameter.
The present system analyzes classified spend data based on pre-determined strategies to find out a saving and compliance opportunity across category and supplier.
The present invention is based on standard category and supplier based saving strategies. It further creates business constraints for data analysis. It also helps in compliance based strategies.
These strategies are supplier payment based saving and compliance strategies, e.g., payment term rationalization and supplier payment term compliance.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The invention will now be described in relation to the accompanying drawings in which:
The same reference numerals refer to the same parts throughout the various Figures.
The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, or uses.
Referring to
a processor unit; and
a computer readable medium storing instructions executable by the processor unit comprising:
an input system adapted for entering pre-defined parameters, including but not limited to information of spend data, category of spend data, information of supplier, payment term, type of contract, contract term, other parameters and business constraints;
a strategy selection system to select a spend analysis strategy from a spend analysis strategy system, adapted for analyzing classified spend data based on pre-determined savings and compliance strategies;
a category/supplier display system to display categories/suppliers for user-defined spend data that match the default/user-defined business constraints;
wherein the category/supplier display system is integrated with a classification system adapted for classifying spend data based on pre-defined parameters; and
an output system adapted for displaying output for a strategy selected for a specific parameter.
According to another exemplary embodiment, the spend analysis strategy system further comprises:
a payment term rationalization strategy system adapted for identifying savings by tracking the difference in payment terms for a commodity of a supplier;
a supplier payment term compliance strategy system adapted for identifying compliance with the supplier by comparing different payment terms with each other suggesting the best day of payment and thereby calculating potential savings for different payment terms.
According to yet another exemplary embodiment, the payment term rationalization strategy system is adapted for rationalizing the payment term days to the best payment term, when payment terms are different for a commodity of a supplier.
The payment term rationalization strategy system is further adapted for calculating savings potential for a category of commodity, e.g., matching the pre-defined business constraints, with different payment terms by the formula:
Savings Potential=(((best payment term days−payment term days of the row)*row spend/365)*saving % parameter).
Payment to suppliers is usually done based on the contracted timelines such as advance payment, on delivery payment, net 30 days, net 45 days, net 60 days, etc. Payment terms rationalization is a strategy that suggests use of uniform payment terms most beneficial to the organization across suppliers or spend categories. Payment terms, when rationalized effectively, can result in considerable gains. Consider the following case scenarios:
Suppose supplier X is supplying three items A, B and C. While the payment is made on net 30 days for items A and B, for item C the payment is done on net 45 days. Because the supplier is the same for all the items, there is a possible opportunity to negotiate for a net 45 days payment term for all the items. This 15 day delay in the payment will help to keep more capital in hand.
Suppose category item X is being supplied by three different suppliers A, B and C. While the payment is made on net 30 days to suppliers A and B, payment to supplier C is done on net 45 days. In this case, because supplier C supplies the same category items as the other two, there is possible opportunity to negotiate with suppliers A and B for a net 45 days payment term.
Savings in both case scenarios will come for the extra working capital available for 15 additional days. Savings is calculated using the above described formula.
According to still another exemplary embodiment, the supplier payment term compliance strategy system may be adapted for comparing actual paid days, contracted days, discounted days and % discount for a supplier of a commodity being selected and thereby calculating capital gain and discount, if a discount is availed for a commodity.
The supplier payment term compliance strategy system may be further adapted for calculating the savings potential, and thus best payment day, by taking into consideration the difference in actual paid days, contracted days and discounted days, by the following formula:
A=capital gain interest until the last discounted period day+discount gain;
B=capital interest gain until the last contracted period day;
wherein the potential savings=difference between A and B; and
wherein the best payment day=day with the higher potential savings.
According to still another exemplary embodiment, the supplier payment term compliance strategy system may be adapted for comparing actual paid days and contracted days for a supplier of a commodity being selected and thereby calculating the capital gain, if a discount is not availed for a commodity.
The supplier payment term compliance strategy system may be further adapted for calculating the savings potential, and thus best payment day, by taking into consideration the difference in actual paid days and contracted days by following formula:
C=discount amount gain−capital interest loss due to early payment;
D=capital interest gain until the last contracted period day;
wherein the potential savings=difference between C and D; and
wherein the best payment day=day with higher potential savings.
Thus the supplier payment term compliance strategy system may analyze the pros and cons of the utilization of the entire credit period or paying early by availing the discount.
The payment term rationalization strategy system and the supplier payment term compliance strategy system may also be adapted for application of the interest rate.
For example, consider these two situations: (1) if a discount is availed, i.e., payment is made within a discounted period; and (2) if discount is not availed, i.e., payment is not made within a discounted period. These two situations, e.g., at different discount scenarios and at discount percentages, are illustrated in
The benefits of the present invention include, without limitation, (1) it starts with actionable opportunities, not just static spend reports; (2) it simplifies the process of creating opportunity reports; and (3) it isolates and analyzes datasets with high savings potential that also gives compliance results.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes can be made and equivalents can be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications can be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3578/MUM/2012 | Dec 2012 | IN | national |
