The invention relates generally to the field of RFID.
In the field of radio frequency identification (RFID), where multiple transponder interrogators (readers) are present is a limited area, it is sometimes necessary to synchronize the readers is to reduce or eliminate interference from one reader onto another reader or from two readers onto a transponder. By synchronizing the readers both readers can communicate with transponders in a way that both readers to communicate with their respective transponders without interfering with each other's signals.
This invention consists of a method for using a signal (either at RF or baseband) to synchronize in time two or more RFID readers, and to minimize interference among a group of reader using time and frequency multiplexing. The reason to synchronize the readers is to reduce or eliminate interference from one reader onto another reader or from two readers onto a transponder. By synchronizing the readers both readers can communicate with transponders in a way that allows both readers to communicate with their respective transponders without interfering with each other's signals. Adding frequency multiplexing to additional groups of readers will allow this configuration to exist in areas with multiple readers such as a toll plaza with multiple traffic lanes.
An exemplary synchronization circuit looks for specific patterns in the RF or modulation signal from reader 1. The patterns are based on the transponder protocol reader 1 is using to communicate. Once the synchronization circuit detects the pattern, the circuit generates a signal or pulse that is sent to reader 2. This indicates that reader 1 is in the process of transmitting a command. Reader 2 uses that pulse to know when reader 1 is communication with a transponder.
The synchronization circuit does not have to be an external circuit. Reader 2 could be modified to look at the RF output or modulation signal of reader 1 to detect the modulation from reader 1 to generate a synchronization signal.
To maximize efficiency, different reader/transponder systems may need to use different multiple access schemes. As an example, in RFID tolling systems active transponders all use the same frequency to communicate from transponder to reader. These active transponders need to use separate time slots to minimize interference among readers. Backscatter or passive transponders use different RF frequencies to minimize interference among readers. This invention combines the synchronization method above with the concept of using time slots for appropriate protocols and separate frequencies for other protocols to minimize interference and other deleterious effects like cross-lane reads.
With respect to the timing diagram in
With respect to the timing diagram in
With respect to
In this example each of the synchronization circuits detects the modulation of reader 1. Reader 2 uses the output of the synchronization circuit to start a delay. The delay for each pair of readers is different, but allows the RF from each of the reader 2s in the diagram to operate simultaneously. The RF frequency for each of the reader 2s in the diagram is different. This allows the group of reader 1s to operate with TDM and the group of reader 2s to operate with FDM. This diagram shows that all of the readers 2s are operating at the same time on different frequencies. This is not the only configuration that could be used. Each of the reader 2s do not have to be aligned in time. The reader 2s in the diagram could each operate at different times as long as they did not interfere with the operation of the reader is in their group.
This is utility application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of provisional application Ser. No. 61/761,033 filed on Feb. 5, 2013 entitled “System and Method for Synchronizing RFID Readers Utilizing RF or Modulation Signals” and on provisional application Ser. No. 61/775,328 filed on Mar. 8, 2013 and entitled “System and Method for Synchronizing RFID Readers Utilizing RF or Modulation Signals.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4511887 | Fiore | Apr 1985 | A |
4739328 | Koelle et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4782345 | Landt | Nov 1988 | A |
4864158 | Koelle et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4999636 | Landt et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5030807 | Landt et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5295064 | Malec et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5485520 | Chaum et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5504485 | Landt et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5528222 | Moskowitz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537105 | Marsh et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5550547 | Chan et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5581249 | Yoshida | Dec 1996 | A |
5604486 | Lauro et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606322 | Allen et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606323 | Heinrich et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5673037 | Cesar et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5748137 | d'Hont | May 1998 | A |
5751220 | Ghaffari | May 1998 | A |
5802105 | Tiedemann, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5864545 | Gonikberg et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5887176 | Griffith et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889489 | Friedman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5912632 | Dieska et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5939984 | Brady et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940006 | MacLellan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942987 | Heinrich et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943617 | Nakamura | Aug 1999 | A |
5952940 | Matsumoto | Sep 1999 | A |
5999091 | Wortham | Dec 1999 | A |
6078251 | Landt et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097347 | Duan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107910 | Nysen | Aug 2000 | A |
6118829 | North | Sep 2000 | A |
6121880 | Scott et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6169474 | Greeff et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6219543 | Myers et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6275157 | Mays et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6381269 | Gradl et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6476708 | Johnson | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486769 | McLean | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6509836 | Ingram | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529488 | Urs et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538564 | Cole | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6617962 | Horwitz et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6677852 | Landt | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6734797 | Shanks et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735426 | Pau | May 2004 | B1 |
6856802 | Kinnunen et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6946950 | Ueno et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6975228 | Wrasman et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6988667 | Stewart et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7016311 | Tiernay et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7075412 | Reynolds et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7215976 | Brideglall | May 2007 | B2 |
7225992 | Forster | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7253719 | Diorio et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7394324 | Diorio et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7592898 | Ovard et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
20010050922 | Tiernay et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20060022800 | Krishna | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038659 | Takano | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20120280796 | Gravelle et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
TransCore Newsroom, 1999 Archives, Sep. 27, 1999, “RFID and Bar Code in One Compact, Lightweight Intermec Scanner,” http://transcore.com/newsroom/1999%20news/news990927.html. |
TransCore Newsroom, 2002 Archives, Sep. 23, 2002 “TransCore's eGo Products Put Electronic Toll Collection and Vehicle Registration in High Gear,” http://www.transcore.com/newsroom/2002%20news/news020921—2.html. |
TC IP, Ltd., May 2003, “eGo Electronic Toll Collection and Electronic Vehicle Registration”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140218175 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61761033 | Feb 2013 | US | |
61775328 | Mar 2013 | US |