Not Applicable
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is related to development of Web sites and applications. More specifically, the present invention relates to facilitated Internet communications between a client-side and a server-side.
2. Description of the Related Art
Prior to Rich Internet Applications, traditional Web applications involved a client-server architecture with all of the processing on the server side and the client-side used to display the HTML web-pages served by the server. Each time a user desired to view a new Web-page, a HTTP request was sent to the server and the requested Web-page was served to the Web browser on the client-side. Such a traditional system is shown in
Rich Internet Applications, such as Ajax, greatly improved on the traditional client-server architecture by allowing the client machine to dynamically render and partially refresh web pages based on an initial set of instructions from the server, user input, and small amounts of subsequent data dynamically requested from the server. As shown in
Early Web applications allowed a user's browser to send a request to a server. The server processed the request and responded to the browser with a Web page. When the user wanted to view a new page, another request was sent to the server and the server responded to the browser with a new Web page. Such a process resulted in a waste of bandwidth since much of the Web contents in the first Web page were also contained in the second web page. The need to resend the same information led to a much slower user interface of a Web application than that of a native application.
An emerging technology, called Ajax (Asynchronous and JavaScript XML), was developed for refreshing part of a page instead of refreshing the whole page on every interaction between the user and application. In an Ajax application, when a user submits a form in a page, a script program, usually a JavaScript program, resident on the Web browser receives the user's request and sends a XML (Extended Markup Language) HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol) request to the Web server in background so as to retrieve only the needed Web contents instead of the whole page and perform corresponding processing to partly refresh the page when receiving a response from the Web server. In this way, the application response time is shortened, because the amount of data exchanged between the Web browser and the Web server is greatly reduced. And the processing time of the Web server is saved because much of the processing is performed at the client side.
General definitions for terms utilized in the pertinent art are set forth below.
Ajax is the use of dynamic HTML, JavaScript and CSS to create dynamic and usually interactive Web sites and applications. A more detailed explanation of Ajax is set forth in Edmond Woychowsky, AJAX, Creating Web Pages with Asynchronous JavaScript and XML, Prentice Hall, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Applets or Java Applets are mini-executable programs named with the .class suffix and are placed on a Web page and provide interactive and multimedia uses.
Application Programming Interface (API) is a collection of computer software code, usually a set of class definitions, that can perform a set of related complex tasks, but has a limited set of controls that may be manipulated by other software-code entities. The set of controls is deliberately limited for the sake of clarity and ease of use, so that programmers do not have to work with the detail contained within the given API itself.
An Attribute provides additional information about an element, object or file. In a Document Object Model, an attribute, or attribute node, is contained within an element node.
Behavioral layer is the top layer and is the scripting and programming that adds interactivity and dynamic effects to a site.
Binding in a general sense is the linking of a library to an application program usually to prevent repetition of frequently utilized code.
Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) is a W3C standard for defining the presentation of Web documents.
Compiler is a computer program that translates a series of instructions written in one computer language into a resulting output in a different computer language.
Document Object Model (DOM) Element is an object contained in a Document Object Model (DOM). The term DOM is generally used to refer to the particular DOM held in the memory region being used by the Web browser. Such a DOM controls the Graphical Respondent Interface (GRI) or Graphical User Interface (GUI). The DOM is generated according to the information that the Web browser reads from the HTML file, and/or from direct JavaScript software instructions. Generally, there exists a unique DOM element for every unique HTML element. DOM elements are sometimes referred to as HTML/DOM elements, because the DOM element exists only because HTML code that was read by the Web browser listed some HTML element that had not previously existed, and thereby caused the Web browser to create that DOM element. Often specific elements of the greater set of HTML/DOM elements are identified by specifying an HTML/DOM checkbox element, or an HTML/DOM text input element. A more detailed explanation of the document object model is set forth in Jeremy Keith, DOM Scripting, Web Design with JavaScript and the Document Object Model, friends of, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
HyperText Markup Language (HTML) is a method of mixing text and other content with layout and appearance commands in a text file, so that a browser can generate a displayed image from the file.
Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is a set of conventions for controlling the transfer of information via the Internet from a Web server computer to a client computer, and also from a client computer to a Web server.
Internet is the worldwide, decentralized totality of server computers and data-transmission paths which can supply information to a connected and browser-equipped client computer, and can receive and forward information entered from the client computer.
JavaScript is an object-based programming language. JavaScript is an interpreted language, not a compiled language. JavaScript is generally designed for writing software routines that operate within a client computer on the Internet. Generally, the software routines are downloaded to the client computer at the beginning of the interactive session, if they are not already cached on the client computer. JavaScript is discussed in greater detail below.
JSON is JavaScript Object Notation format, which is a way of taking data and turning it into valid JavaScript syntax for reconstituting an object at the other end of the transmission protocol.
MySQL is a relational database management system which relies on SQL for processing data in a database.
Parser is a component of a compiler that analyzes a sequence of tokens to determine its grammatical structure with respect to a given formal grammer. Parsing transforms input text into a data structure, usually a tree, which is suitable for later processing and which captures the implied hierarchy of the input. XML Parsers ensure that an XML document follows the rules of XML markup syntax correctly.
Platform is the combination of a client computer, an operating system, and a browser, which together can support Internet access and in particular the operation of interactive forms.
Presentation layer follows the structural layer, and provides instructions on how the document should look on the screen, sound when read aloud or be formatted when it is printed.
Rendering engine is software used with a Web browser that takes Web content (HTML, XML, image files) and formatting information (CSS, XSL) and displays the formatted content on a screen.
Serialization places an object in a binary form for transmission across a network such as the Internet and deserialization involves extracting a data structure from a series of bytes.
SQL (Structured Query Language) is a computer language designed for data retrieval and data management in a database.
Structural layer of a Web page is the marked up document and foundation on which other layers may be applied.
User is a client computer, generally operated by a human being, but in some system contexts running an automated process not under full-time human control.
Web-Browser is a complex software program, resident in a client computer, that is capable of loading and displaying text and images and exhibiting behaviors as encoded in HTML (HyperText Markup Language) from the Internet, and also from the client computer's memory. Major browsers include MICROSOFT INTERNET EXPLORER, NETSCAPE, APPLE SAFARI, MOZILLA FIREFOX, and OPERA.
Web-Server is a computer able to simultaneously manage many Internet information-exchange processes at the same time. Normally, server computers are more powerful than client computers, and are administratively and/or geographically centralized. An interactive-form information-collection process generally is controlled from a server computer, to which the sponsor of the process has access.
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) is an unofficial standards body which creates and oversees the development of web technologies and the application of those technologies.
XHTML (Extensible Hypertext Markup Language) is a language for describing the content of hypertext documents intended to be viewed or read in a browser.
XML (Extensible Markup Language) is a W3C standard for text document markup, and it is not a language but a set of rules for creating other markup languages.
There are three types of JavaScript: 1) Client-side JavaScript; 2) Server-side JavaScript; and 3) Core JavaScript. Client-side JavaScript is generally an extended version of JavaScript that enables the enhancement and manipulation of web pages and client browsers. Server-side JavaScript is an extended version of JavaScript that enables back-end access to databases, file systems, and servers. Core JavaScript is the base JavaScript.
Core JavaScript includes the following objects: array, date, math, number and string. Client-side JavaScript and Server-side JavaScript have additional objects and functions that are specific to client-side or server-side functionality. Generally, any JavaScript libraries (.js files) created in core JavaScript can be used on both the client and the server without changes. Client-side JavaScript is composed of a Core JavaScript and additional objects such as: document, form, frame and window. The objects in Client-side JavaScript enable manipulation of HTML documents (checking form fields, submitting forms, creating dynamic pages) and the browser (directing the browser to load other HTML pages, display messages). Server-side JavaScript is composed of Core JavaScript and additional objects and functions for accessing databases and file systems, and sending email. Server-side JavaScript enables Web developers to efficiently create database-driven web applications. Server-side JavaScript is generally used to create and customize server-based applications by scripting the interaction between objects. Client-side JavaScript may be served by any server but only displayed by JavaScript-enabled browsers. Server-side JavaScript must be served by a JavaScript-enabled server but can be displayed by any browser.
United States Patent Application Publication Number 20010037359 describes a system and method for a server-side browser including markup language graphical user interface, dynamic markup language rewriter engine and profile engine. The system includes a user computer and a destination server computer separated by a server computer hosting a server-side browser (SSB). The SSB includes a markup language graphical user interface (MLGUI), a dynamic markup language rewriter engine (DMLRE) and a profiling engine (PE). The SSB may be configured as an intermediary infrastructure residing on the Internet providing customized information gathering for a user. The components of the SSB allow for controlling, brokering and distributing information more perfectly by controlling both browser functionality (on the client-side) and server functionality (on the destination site side) within a single point and without the necessity of incremental consents or integration of either side.
However, current technologies that operate Server-side JavaScript fail to offer complete interactions which are the hallmark of rich web sites and applications. When writing software, it is often convenient to group the code according to the area of functionality it provides. But the group might span code that needs to run on the server, code that needs to run on the client, code that needs to run on both, or run on the server and get stored there and have a proxy for it created on the client, etc.
The Present Invention overcomes the obstacles of the prior art. With the present invention, one can tag a code in a variety of ways to designate its run-related behavior. For example, one can designate an entire script block with a “runat” attribute, which then applies to the code in that script block; one can programmatically set “runat” attributes on code, such as functions and objects, to control behavior at a finer granularity; and one can add annotations via JavaScript comments to set the “runat” attributes without changing the JavaScript or HTML syntactically. Additionally, one can use the JavaScript language itself to annotate the functions to define their “runat” characteristics.
One aspect of the present invention is a method for tagging to code to determine a run location. The method includes writing a code for a web application. The method also includes identifying a plurality of sections of the code according to runat attributes. The method also includes tagging each of the plurality of sections of the code with a runat attribute.
Another aspect of the present invention is a system for tagging code to determine a run location. The system includes a server, a client, a code written in a scripting language, with the code having a plurality of sections identified according to runat attributes, and means for tagging each of the plurality of sections of the code with a runat attribute.
Yet another aspect of the present invention is a web environment for tagging code to determine a run location. The web environment includes a server, a client, a code written in a scripting language, with the code having a plurality of sections identified according to runat attributes, and means for tagging each of the plurality of sections of the code with a runat attribute.
Yet another aspect of the present invention is a method for tagging to code to determine a run location. The method includes writing a code for a web application. The method also includes identifying a plurality of sections of the code according to runat attributes. The method also includes grouping the code according to an area of functionality. The method also includes tagging each of the plurality of sections of the code with a runat attribute.
Yet another aspect of the present invention is a computer program product for creating a Web application. The computer program product comprises a code written in a scripting language, with the code having a plurality of sections identified according to runat attributes, and means for tagging each of the plurality of sections of the code with a runat attribute.
Having briefly described the present invention, the above and further objects, features and advantages thereof will be recognized by those skilled in the pertinent art from the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
As shown in
In
In
As shown in
After server 50 sends the resulting HTML page to the browser 65, at 2 the browser 65 interprets the HTML page and executes the JavaScript within the HTML page. If JavaScript functions tagged to runat=“server-proxy” are included, then the present invention automatically strips out the bodies of those functions and replaces the bodies with a new functions by the same name that know how to invoke the original function on the server 50 using Ajax calls and return the result either synchronously or asynchronously. Ajax communications do not need to be written using the present invention. Any functions not tagged with a runat attribute or set to runat=“client” or runat=“both” are processed by the browser 65.
Any functions set to runat=“server-proxy” can now be called from the browser 65. The function is called as if it were running on the browser 65, and the present invention, automatically via XHR communications with the server 50, marshals the parameters to the server 50 where the function executes (calling databases, getting info from the session data, etc. . . . ) and returns the result to the browser 65. The “server-proxy” functions can be invoked either synchronously or asynchronously. At 3, the browser 65 calls the server 50 asynchronously for new information.
The server computer program of the present invention is pre-configured for preferable use as a plug-in to the APACHE 2.x web server. To provide standards-compliant JavaScript and DOM capabilities server-side, the server computer program is built on the MOZILLA engine, which is the same engine used in the popular FIREFOX browser. The server computer program of the present invention is layered into APACHE as an input and output filter for use to modify dynamic pages created by other languages, such as PHP or Ruby.
The server computer program of the present invention is preferably a combination of C/C++ “Core” code and a server-side JavaScript “Framework.” The server-core 55 provides the JavaScript parser and runtime, HTML parser and DOM engine, and an event architecture that calls the server-framework 60 as the
On the server side 25, a developer's JavaScript environment is enhanced by the server-framework 60, which provides access to the database (e.g., MySQL), file system, network, the HTTP Request and Response data, and the external server-side platforms such as Java, PHP, and Ruby.
An example of code written by a developer and prior to processing by the present invention is set forth below.
Processing of the code by the present invention results in the code being formatted as set forth below:
As shown in
As shown in
A general method 100 of the present invention is shown in
A more specific method 200 of the present invention is shown in
Code runs on the server architecture of the present invention. To define and/or execute any code server-side, a runat attribute is added to a <script> block. The attribute has several possible values, and the values determine where the code will execute (whenever the page is served) and the other actions that will automatically occur when the code is executed. The Table One provides a description of each value for the basic attributes.
Although most use cases are covered by the basic attributes listed in Table One, one can use the runat values listed in Table Two on <script> tags.
Special function object properties are declared on the individual function objects and control how the special function object properties are managed. When these are specified the property value will override the containing script block runat setting for the individual function. This allows more granular control and prevents the need to break scripts out into separate files depending on their runat target. Table Three illustrates some of these properties.
The following example illustrates one simple way of using the runat and proxy options in a typical code scenario. Group all the server-side code in one script block, and explicitly designate a subset of function to be proxied. Then all client-side code goes in a different script block (where there isn't even the option of programmatically changing it by setting a different runat or proxy value). Of course those skilled in the pertinent art may choose different ways of organizing the code. Further, for large amounts of code, one has the option to extract the code into (reusable) external JavaScript files.
The following illustrates code for the example. The _login.js file referenced in the example contains some functions that explicitly override the runat=‘server’ directive specified on the script tag used to load the file.
<script type=“text/javascript” runat=“server”>
Function setPassword(username, newPasword)
{
In the snippet set forth the below, the function is proxied.
function checkCredentials (username, password)
{
In the snippet set forth below, the function runs on the client-side.
function login( )
{
The following is an illustration of object inside an Aptana namespace to allow the proxy functions to be declared in a single group within JavaScript code.
Aptana.proxies=(myFunc1, myFunc2, “myFunction”};
// . . .
Aptana.proxies=Aptana.proxies .psuh{myFunc3, “myFunction4”};
This code is presented in such a way that it is executed by the server prior to DOM serialization. One can also use this code to remove the proxied functions by setting the value to null. Also, Aptana.proxies is not a complete collection of the functions being proxied by the server it is just a convenient way to express the myFunc.proxy=true; syntax for multiple function references.
The runat attribute applies to everything within the <script> block. Individual functions within the <script> block are changed to a different runat value by adding a runat/proxy property to them and setting it to the appropriate (string) value: for example, myFunction.runat=“both”. The one exception is for <script> blocks that don't have a runat attribute (or have runat=“client”): since such <script> blocks are not executed at all on the server, setting runat properties within those <script> blocks will not take place on the server, so the behavior of functions within them cannot be changed from within them.
From the foregoing it is believed that those skilled in the pertinent art will recognize the meritorious advancement of this invention and will readily understand that while the present invention has been described in association with a preferred embodiment thereof, and other embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings, numerous changes modification and substitutions of equivalents may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention which is intended to be unlimited by the foregoing except as may appear in the following appended claim. Therefore, the embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined in the following appended claims.
This Application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/988,117, filed on Nov. 15, 2008, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4989132 | Mellender et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5361351 | Lenkov et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5448740 | Kiri et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5794046 | Meier et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5812851 | Levy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821851 | Blackmer | Oct 1998 | A |
5878223 | Becker et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6067413 | Gustafsson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6144962 | Weinberg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151599 | Shrader et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6185587 | Bernardo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192382 | Lafer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6240414 | Beizer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6324686 | Komatsu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6356283 | Guedalia | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381737 | Click, Jr. et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6453335 | Kaufmann | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470349 | Heninger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6539433 | Tominaga et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6609246 | Guhr et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6684369 | Bernardo et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6779114 | Chow et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6829746 | Schwerdtfeger et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6874025 | Hoogenboom et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6915454 | Moore et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6941562 | Gao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6981215 | Lindhorst et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6990653 | Burd et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7000008 | Bautista-Lloyd et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7024689 | O'Donnell et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043460 | Deboer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047318 | Svedloff | May 2006 | B1 |
7051084 | Hayton et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7058633 | Gnagy et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062506 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7086041 | Plesko et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103600 | Mullins | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103881 | Stone | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117504 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124445 | Cronce et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139798 | Zircher et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143136 | Drenan et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7167862 | Mullins | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7213231 | Bandhole et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7222336 | Willis | May 2007 | B2 |
7231644 | Kieffer | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7269636 | McCollum et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7284054 | Radhakrishnan | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7284239 | Young et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7296297 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308648 | Buchthal et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7313789 | Yellin et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7333801 | Chandhok | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7386786 | Davis et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389330 | Dillon et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7426723 | Nikolov | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7451352 | Moore et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454526 | Brown et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7478401 | Irassar et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7478408 | Sesma | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487201 | Murray et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7496841 | Hadfield et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500223 | DeSantis | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506315 | Kabadiyski et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7509654 | Jennings et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7542957 | Roy et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7543267 | Lindhorst et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7543271 | Gadre | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555484 | Kulkarni et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7596620 | Colton et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7614052 | Wei | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617491 | Nedderman | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7653623 | Kashima et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657436 | Elmore et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7685609 | McLellan | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7707547 | Colton et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716634 | Ross et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725530 | Sah et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7788341 | Burns | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7814410 | Kothari et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7823009 | Tormasov et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7844958 | Colton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7870221 | Matveief et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7921353 | Murray | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7958232 | Colton et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7958493 | Lindsey et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20010025373 | Gebhart et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010032320 | Abdelnur et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037292 | Vogt | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037359 | Mockett et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007393 | Hamel | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016828 | Daugherty et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023158 | Polizzi et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020069255 | Dinovo | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073235 | Chen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099738 | Grant | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112247 | Horner et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138555 | Yu | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020184363 | Viavant et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199190 | Su | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005044 | Miller et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025728 | Ebbo et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033448 | Kieffer | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051188 | Patil | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061404 | Atwal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084431 | Kobayashi | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088687 | Begeja et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105810 | McCrory et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030145282 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030177176 | Hirschfeld et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195923 | Bloch et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030226110 | Scheering | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003377 | Di Loreto | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010621 | Afergan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021679 | Chapman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040061713 | Jennings | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064822 | Noda | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066410 | Lindhorst et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040123238 | Hefetz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143823 | Wei | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158843 | Cloccarelli | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167784 | Travieso et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167876 | Salerno et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168162 | Park et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040177147 | Joshi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177335 | Beisiegel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201618 | Alderson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205411 | Hong et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210865 | Shimura | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225633 | Jau | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236927 | Irie et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250262 | Irassar et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268303 | Abe et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005160 | Bates et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015759 | Zatloukal | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027823 | Rana | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050028084 | Dziejma | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043940 | Elder | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044197 | Lai | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050066319 | DeLine et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069207 | Zakrzewski et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086344 | Suesserman | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091576 | Relyea et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091650 | Heeb | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102400 | Nakahara | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144622 | Ballinger et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050160415 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172338 | Sandu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177753 | Carpenter | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182778 | Heuer et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188051 | Sneh | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198202 | Yamamoto | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246391 | Gross | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256933 | Millington et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278641 | Mansour et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015842 | DeSantis | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060047780 | Patnude | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064434 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075088 | Guo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080592 | Alves de Moura et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060123397 | McGuire | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129997 | Stichnoth et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136555 | Patrick et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136712 | Nagendra et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149746 | Bansod et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060150111 | Farber | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155707 | Marcjan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156279 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167981 | Bansod et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173998 | Ohara | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190997 | Mahajani et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200491 | Weber | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200503 | Dosa et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230133 | Snyder et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230149 | Jackson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236223 | Aubert et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253508 | Colton et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259592 | Angeline | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277250 | Cherry et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011650 | Hage et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055964 | Mirkazemi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061700 | Kothari et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067418 | Isaacs et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073739 | Jennings et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073806 | Srinivas et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100967 | Smith et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106946 | Goetz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107057 | Chander et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113188 | Bales et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124311 | Lee et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124500 | Bedingfield, Sr. et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136201 | Sah et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136477 | Bryce et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143283 | Spencer et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143672 | Lipton et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150480 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070174419 | O'Connell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070203973 | Landauer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214239 | Mechkov et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214261 | Kikuchi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070231781 | Zimmermann et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240032 | Wilson | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250513 | Hall et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070288858 | Pereira et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005657 | Sneh | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010338 | Curtis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080072139 | Salinas et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077556 | Muriente | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082965 | Atkin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104025 | Dharamshi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104224 | Litofsky et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109680 | Kodaka et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140786 | Tran | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080208888 | Mitchell | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080243475 | Everhart et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244586 | Hopp | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288739 | Bamba et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294794 | Darugar et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295004 | Coca et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295164 | Steiner et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301696 | Tantawi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307389 | Marchant | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090013255 | Yuschik et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030926 | Aharoni et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090070869 | Fan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090100154 | Stevenson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106052 | Moldovan | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106413 | Salo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119675 | Higgins et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090172792 | Backhouse | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090210631 | Bosworth et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216910 | Duchesneau | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090282136 | Subramanian | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287734 | Borders | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300210 | Ferris | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100035690 | Blackburn et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036903 | Ahmad et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042670 | Kamalakantha et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100064234 | Schreiber et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070566 | Vandewalle | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100174607 | Henkin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100223385 | Gulley et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“Yahoo et al” ;“HOWTO: Use a Web Proxy for Cross-Domain XMLHttpRequest Calls”, “Mar. 16, 2006”; retreived at “https://developer.yahoo.com/javascript/howto-proxy.html”; “3 pages”. |
Gudeman, et al., Representing Type Information Dynamically Typed Languages; 1993, acquired from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.39.4394&rep=rep1&type=pdf, pp. 1.38. |
Shao, et al., A type-based computer for standard ML;ACM, 1995, pp. 116-129. |
Lars Aronsson, Operation of a Large Scale, General Purpose Wiki Website, VWF Berlin, 2002, pp. 27-37. |
Morfik announces Ajax IDE, Wednesday Sep. 28, 2005, ajaxian.com, pp. 1-3. |
Susanne Hupfer, Li-Te Cheng, Steven Ross, John Patterson, Introducing Collaboration into an Application Development Environment, Nov. 6-10, 2004, ACM, vol. 6, Issue 3; pp. 21-24. |
Server Side JavaScript Guide, Nov. 12, 1998, Netscape Communications Corp., pp. 1-4. |
Niels Leenheer, rakaz, “Make your pages load faster by combining and compressing javascript and css files,” Dec. 18, 2006, rakaz.nl/2006/12/make-your-pages-load-faster-by-combining-and-compressing-javascript-and-css-files.html, pp. 1-4. |
Mitchell, Scott, URL Rewriting in asp.net, published Mar. 2004 at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms972974.aspx. |
Making JavaScript Smaller: Dojo's Compressor, downloaded from The Internet WaybackMachine http://web.archive.org/web/20061114133532/http://dojotoolkit.org/docs/compressor—system.html on Sep. 13, 2011, archived on Nov. 11, 2006. |
JSMIN, The JavaScript Minifier, Douglas Crockford, www.crockford.com, Dec. 4, 2003, downloaded Sep. 13, 2011 from http://www.crockford.com/javascript/jsmin.html. |
Saravanan, “LiveCycle Productivity Kit Issue”, Mar. 2007, Online Discussion; [retrieved on Apr. 10, 2012]; Retrieved from Internet <URL:http://Ipk.riaforge.org/index.cfm?event=page.issue&issueid=78540FD5-F12A-3F6C-35E6...>; pp. 1-11. |
Steve Vinoski, “Scripting JAX-WS,” IEEE Internet Computing, May & Jun. 2006, pp. 91-94. |
Na Kika: Secure Service Execution and Composition in an Open Edge-Side Computing Network; Robert Grimm, Guy Lichtman, Nikolaos Michalakis, Amos Elliston, Adam Kravetz, Jonathan Miler, and Sajid Raza; NSDI '06: 3rd Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation; 2006. |
Remixing the Web: Tailoring Applications using Programmable Proxies inside Web Browsers; Leslie Wu, Joel Brandt, Scott Klemmer; Stanford Technical Report; Oct. 3, 2007. |
TrickyScripter,by Val Polyakh 2006, archived by the Internet WayBack Machine, Nov. 2006, http://web.archive.org/web/20061113030853/http://trickyscripter.com/ http://web.archive.org/web/20061113030904/http://trickyscripter.com/FAQ/,downloaded Jun. 22, 2012. |
“Free JavaScript Optimizer”, by Xtreeme, http://web.archive.org/web/20071114185001/http://www.xtreeme.com/javascript-optimizer/archived by the Internet WayBack Machine Nov. 14, 2007, downloaded Jun. 22, 2012. |
Kersten, Mik; Murphy, Gail C; 1999, ACM, “Atlas: A Case Study in Building a Web-Based Learning Environment Using Aspect-Oriented Programming”. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed May 28, 2009 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,428. |
Final Office Action mailed Jan. 11, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,428. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,428. |
Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,428. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed May 4, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/270,817. |
Final Office Action mailed Jan. 17, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/270,817. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/270,817. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 11, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/955,881. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 13/175,570. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 11, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/273,539. |
Final Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/273,539. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 8, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/275,182. |
Final Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/275,182. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 24, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/275,213. |
Final Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/275,213. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/276,327. |
Final Office Action mailed Apr. 4, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/276,327. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 13, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/276,336. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 20, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/276,337. |
Final Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/276,337. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed May 4, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,239. |
Final Office Action mailed Sep. 25, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,239. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 2, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,240. |
Final Office Action mailed Nov. 8, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,240. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 24, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,240. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 20, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,268. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 17, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,268. |
Final Office Action mailed Aug. 24, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,268. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 3, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,103. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,110. |
Final Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,110. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 22, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,110. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 4, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,861. |
Final Office Action mailed Jul. 5, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,861. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 9, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,891. |
Final Office Action mailed Mar. 27, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,891. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 29, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,910. |
Final Office Action mailed Jun. 19, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,910. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 26, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,330. |
Final Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,330. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,330. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 20, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,802. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 9, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/334,434. |
Final Office Action mailed Jan. 28, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/334,434. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,159. |
Final Office Action mailed Aug. 17, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,159. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US07/01697, mailed Feb. 5, 2008. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US07/66673, mailed Jul. 7, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60988117 | Nov 2007 | US |