The disclosed embodiments relate generally to providing information to computer users.
An electronic document, be it a web page or an email message, often contains references to specific information entities in the real world, such as a phone number, an address, a product name or a movie title. While viewing the document, a reader may desire to learn more information with respect to a particular information entity and then decide the next move. For example, while reading an email message including a title of a newly released movie, the reader may prefer to have quick and easy access to reviews about the movie and even the movie's schedule at a nearby movie theater in case he or she decides to watch the movie. Therefore, it is desirable to have a system and method that automatically retrieves information related to an information entity identified in a document in advance and selectively displays some of the information when rendering the document.
According to some embodiments, a method of serving an electronic document in response to a client request includes identifying an electronic document requested by a client. At least one information entity matching at least one predetermined information entity type is extracted from the electronic document. One or more links are then generated for each extracted information entity and are served to the requesting client in connection with other information corresponding to the at least one information entity and the electronic document.
For a better understanding of the nature and embodiments of the invention, reference should be made to the Description of Embodiments below, in conjunction with the following drawings in which like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the figures.
The client 102 can be any of a number of devices (e.g., a computer, an internet kiosk, a personal digital assistant, a cell phone, a gaming device, a desktop computer, or a laptop computer) and can include a client application 132, a client assistant 134, and/or client memory 136. The client application 132 can be a software application that permits a user to interact with the client 102 and/or network resources to perform one or more tasks. For example, the client application 132 can be a browser (e.g., Firefox) or other type of application that permits a user to search for, browse, and/or use resources (e.g., web pages and web services) on the client 102 and/or accessible via the communication network 104. The client assistant 134 can perform one or more tasks related to monitoring a user's activities with respect to the client application 132 and/or other applications, searching or browsing for resources (e.g., files) on the client 102, and processing information received from or being sent to information service 106. The client assistant 134 can be part of the client application 132, available as a plug-in to the client application 132 (provided, for example, from various on-line sources), or provided as a stand-alone program. The client assistant can be a web-based messaging application such as the client executable portion of the Google Gmail product. A client memory 136 can store system information and information about a user, among other things.
The communication network 104 can be any local area network (LAN) and/or wide area network (WAN), such as an intranet, an extranet, or the Internet. It is sufficient that the communication network 104 provides communication capability between the clients 102 and the information service 106. In some embodiments, the communication network 104 uses the HyperText Transport Protocol (HTTP) to transport information using the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP). The HTTP permits client computers to access various resources available via the communication network 104. The various embodiments of the invention, however, are not limited to the use of any particular protocol. The term “resource” as used throughout this specification refers to any piece of information or service that is accessible via a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) and can be, for example, a web page, a document, an email message, an Instant Messaging (IM) message, a Short Message Service (SMS) message, a transcribed voice message, a database, an image, or a computational object.
The conversation engine 110 can respond to a variety of requests from the client assistant 134 related to messages and return conversation-based responses via its connection with the communication network 104. A conversation can include one or more relevant messages relating to a conversation topic. Various criteria can be used to determine which messages are part of each distinct conversation. For example, an analysis can be made of the contents of messages received and/or sent by a user. Messages whose contents are found to be related can be grouped together. In another example, a thread identifier found in a message header can also be used to identify related messages. In a further example, a subject line in the message header can be used to identify related messages. The senders and recipients of the messages are participants in the conversation. All messages directed to a user of the information service 106 can be grouped into a plurality of conversations and presented to the user in a conversation-based format, individually or jointly. In a conversation list view, a user can see in a summary form a list of conversations in which the user participates. In a conversation view, the user can see in an expanded form one or more of messages associated with a particular conversation.
The information service 106 can create a snippet of a conversation or a message. A snippet provides a user with a preview of the contents of the conversation or message without the user having to open the conversation or the message. In a list of conversations, the snippet can be generated from the most recent message in the conversation. The snippet can also be extracted from the first message (i.e., the oldest message) in the conversation. The snippet can also be extracted from all the messages in the conversation according to predefined heuristic rules, e.g., listing a set of keywords appearing most frequently in the conversation. If the information service 106 is preparing a list of conversations in response to a search submitted by a user, the information service 106 can create a snippet for each conversation in the list, or for each conversation in a displayed portion of the list, the snippet including a portion of the conversation that matches user-submitted query terms. These snippets may be similar in one or more respects to snippets included in search results returned by a search engine, such as the Google search engine. In a conversation view, a snippet can be generated for one or more messages in the conversation.
The SMTP gateway 122 is also connected to the communication network 104. The SMTP gateway 122 can be directly involved in receiving and sending messages between the information service 106 and other email systems, messaging systems or information services. In some embodiments, the SMTP gateway 122, for example, transmits and receives messages using the simple mail transfer protocol (SMTP). The SMTP gateway 122 can receive a new message from the communication network 104 and send the message to conversation engine 110 for additional processing. Additionally, the SMTP gateway 122 can receive messages from the conversation engine 110 and then transmit (via the communication network 104) those messages to recipient addresses specified in the messages.
The one or more auxiliary services servers 120 can provide additional services to the conversation engine 110. The auxiliary services servers 120 can, for example, include a spam detection module for detecting and processing spam and/or an attachment management module for managing the storage and retrieval of documents or other files attached to messages.
As mentioned above, the conversation engine 110 can be connected to the targeted information processor 124. The targeted information processor 124 can provide targeted information for display to a user at client 102. The targeted information processor 124 can provide, for example, advertisements and/or other information items related to content (e.g., messages or conversations) being provided to the client assistant 134. The targeted information processor 124 can be connected to category information 126 which is used by the targeted information processor 124 to identify various categories as described below. The category information can be used to obtain, for example, category-related advertisements and/or other information. Category-related advertisements can be obtained, for example, from ad server 128. Category-related other information can be obtained, for example, from information item server 130.
As mentioned above, the client 102 can include a client application 132 and client assistant 134. Client application 132 can provide a window to be displayed on a displaying device (e.g., a monitor) for rendering conversations associated with a particular user. The conversations and messages in the conversations can be encoded using HyperText Markup Language (HTML), XML, or any other appropriate markup language or encoding scheme, and then rendered by the client application 132. When a user submits a request through client application 132 to the information service 106 to access messages stored in the user's account, the information service 106 identifies conversations in the user's account in accordance with the user's request and transfers them as well as a set of display instructions back to the client 102. Client assistant 134 can, in response, generate one or more forms in accordance with the display instructions, where each form can include information of some of the conversations. The forms can then be submitted to and rendered by client application 132. In another embodiment, client assistant 134 may alternatively exist and operate in the information service 106.
The information service 106 and the client assistant 134 work in concert to allow a user to view, compose, send and/or search messages in a user's message account and to present the search results in a highly intuitive fashion. The information service 106 extracts information from a user's message account by processing messages received, sent and/or being composed by the user, and the client assistant 134 assists in rendering the information prepared by the information service 106. In other embodiments a different division of duties between the information service 106 and the client assistant 134 can be implemented. Because many of the tasks performed by the system can be performed by either the information service 106 or the client assistant 134 or by the two working together, these two components are sometimes herein referred to jointly as the “conversation system”.
The conversation system can provide at least two different views including a conversation list view and a conversation view as mentioned briefly above. In a conversation list view, a plurality of conversations can be displayed where each conversation can be displayed in a summary form. For example, each conversation can be represented by a number of conversation elements. The conversation elements can include one or more of: a number indicating the number of messages in the conversation, a list of one or more of the identifiers or names of the senders of messages in the conversation, a conversation description (e.g., a subject line of the message), a date/time value of the conversation (e.g., a date/time value of the last received message in the conversation), and a snippet from one or more of the messages in the conversation. In one approach, each conversation can be represented as a single row in the conversation list view.
In a conversation view, one or more messages from a conversation can be displayed. Each message can be displayed in one of a number of various modes, for example an expanded mode, a compacted mode, or a compressed mode. In an expanded mode, the body of the message can be displayed along with, for example, header information including names or other identifiers of the sender and the recipients of the message, a date/time value indicative of when the message is received or sent, routing information, and other properties of the message. An expanded mode can be used, for example, for messages which are marked as “unread.” In a compacted mode, the message body can be hidden and a snippet from the message is provided in its place. The snippet can be chosen to occupy less space than the body. For example, a snippet can be chosen to occupy only one line in a display window. The compacted mode can be used for messages which have been read or marked as read. The compacted mode allows messages in a conversation view to be displayed within the same window more densely than if the expanded mode were used. In a compressed mode, a message can be represented with a small bar. The small bar can contain no message information. The visual effect of such a mode can be that multiple compressed messages appear like the edges of cards in a deck of cards. A user can toggle between the various display modes by selecting a message or using various controls in the display window. It should be understood that the techniques described in this specification with reference to a conversation (as might be found in the Google Gmail product) can be equally used with any message system (e.g., Outlook or Thunderbird) where messages can be displayed in various views (and can include portions of messages) such as a message view or a thread view where related messages can be displayed.
In some embodiments, when a conversation is being displayed in the conversation view, additional, targeted information (sometimes herein called “informational items”) can be displayed in the display window. For example, one or more advertisements relevant to, or related to, one or more of the messages in the conversation can be displayed. In another example, one or more other types of information can be displayed. Such other information can include, but is not limited to news items or links to news items, map links, phone numbers, links to product information, stock prices or links to stock prices, links to weather forecasts, web page links, dictionary entries or links to dictionary entries, images or links to images, RSS feeds or links to RSS feeds, links to blog (web log) events, links to user polls, links to files or other content on the client 102, and other types of information.
RSS feeds can be content distributed from various sources on a network (e.g., the Internet). RDF Site Summary (RSS) (and sometimes, Real Simple Syndication) is an XML-based lightweight multipurpose extensible metadata description and syndication format. RSS is typically used for distributing various types of content to a number of receivers simultaneously. News items can be news items from one or more sources. Blog events can be events generated from one or more web logs (blogs). User polls can be polls that the user may participate in which may come from a variety of sources. Stock prices can be stock prices of companies whose names or stock ticker symbols are mentioned in the conversation. Weather forecasts can be weather forecasts of locations like cities or states whose names are directly or indirectly referred to by a message in the conversation.
Multiple factors affect the relevancy of an information item to a user of the information service. For instance, the relevancy of the information item to a user in many ways depends on the contents of the input associated with the user. Generally, when an advertising service returns advertisements based on text input, the more closely aligned the text input is with a concept or category that is also associated with the returned advertisements, the more relevant the returned advertisements are likely to be to the user. In some types of messages, certain terms or word phrases are frequently found, but may not be useful in obtaining relevant advertisements. For example, an electronic message from an on-line store notifying a customer that the product he or she ordered has been shipped might include, among other things, the product name and phrases such as “order has shipped”, “left the warehouse”, or “international air”. An advertising service receiving as input the entire message text including both the product name and one or more of these boilerplate-type phrases might inadvertently return advertisements related to shipping, warehouses, or international shipping. These advertisements, although relevant to the phrases, are probably of little interest to the customer, who is more interested in the product.
The identified conversation can then be associated with one or more categories (204). Some examples of categories include, but are not limited to, online shopping, shipping, travel, entertainment, dining, online auctions, health/beauty, taxes, real estate, computer software and hardware, and mortgages. More generally, the categories associated with conversations can include categories of things, activities, processes, concepts and the like. Some conversations may not be related to any category. In some instances a conversation can, therefore, have no associated category. After determining that a conversation belongs to one or more categories, a subset of the content of the conversation can then be extracted (206). The content of a conversation from which a subset can be extracted can include one or more of the following: a conversation description (e.g., a subject line of the message), one or more message bodies, a message sender domain, a message sender, a conversation label, one or more message labels, one or more message recipients, other message information, or information related to a conversation. What is extracted from a conversation into the subset can be dependent on a category identification. The extraction can aid in obtaining information relevant to a conversation by, for example, excluding from the subset content elements in the conversation which may cause information not relevant to the pertinent portions of message to be returned from an information service (e.g., an advertisement service). Generally speaking, a content element is one or more terms, such as a word or word phrase.
In some embodiments, one or more additional keywords can be identified (208), which can be added to the subset prior to the subset being used to obtain relevant information. These additional keywords, which can be dependent on a category identification, can increase a desired relevancy of the information returned from an information service. For example, a “travel” category can be identified for an airline itinerary message to a consumer. Furthermore, when the travel category is so identified, it can be useful to add travel related keywords, such as “hotel” and “car rental”, when forwarding extracted content to an information service. Accordingly, the additional keywords can be content elements that are related to a category but may not be present in a message associated with the category.
The content in the conversation can be used to determine which additional keywords are added. For example, an airline itinerary message to a consumer for an international flight may have “passport” and related, additional keywords added to the content sent to the information service, whereas an airline itinerary message for a domestic flight may not, even though both can be identified as associated with the travel category. As another example, in a flight itinerary, the destination of a flight can be determined (e.g., by identifying or decoding a city, airport or other location code) and the name of the destination can be added to the subset.
Information relevant to the extracted content is then obtained (210) from one or more information services (e.g., ad server 128 and/or information item server 130). The input provided to the information services can include one or more additional keywords identified at 208. In some embodiments (as represented by the dashed line at 212 in
The information obtained from the information services can be displayed with the conversation (214). When the display is on a client 102, the information service 106 can provide formatting information directing the simultaneous display of the information and the conversation in one or more transmissions to the client 102.
Category lists can be compared against a conversation content in a number of ways. For example, the number of times a particular content element from a category list appears in a conversation can be identified. In another example, each of the category lists and the conversation can be treated as a vector of terms and a comparison of a category list to the conversation can be a vector distance. When a conversation has messages that can include the content of a previous message (e.g., as might be found in a reply message), that previous content can be ignored. The most likely category to which a conversation belongs can also be determined in a number of ways. For example, a category having the most number of unique content elements present in the conversation can be identified as the most likely category. As another example, a category that has the highest ratio of the number of content elements which belong to that category as compared to the total number of content elements present in the conversation can be identified as the most likely category. If no content elements from any category content element list are present in the conversation, or if no metrics for any category are greater than a threshold (e.g., the number of unique content elements associated with a category list present in the conversation does not exceed a threshold), the conversation can be associated with no category.
Optionally, an importance factor associated with one or more extracted content elements can be modified (506). An input to an information service (e.g., ad server) can include information relating to the importance of one or more of the content elements in the input. Based on various criteria, it can be determined that one or more content elements provided in an input to an information server (e.g., an ad server) should be treated differently from other content elements. Accordingly, the output of the information server can be weighted toward those content elements deemed important and/or down-weighted for content elements deemed unimportant. One or more content elements associated with a particular part of a pattern can be accorded importance factors different from other parts of the extracted subset. For example, a content elements associated with a product name can be accorded more weight than other extracted content elements. As another example, a content element identified as a destination shipping address in a receipt for online shopping can be down-weighted in importance.
In some embodiments, the information service 106 includes the following elements, or a subset or superset of such elements: a conversation engine 110 for responding to a variety of requests from the client assistant 134 returning conversation-based responses; an updater engine 112 for updating a message database 118; a message index 114 containing index information for messages in the message database 118; a query engine 116 for performing various queries using the message index 114 and message database 118; an auxiliary services server 120 for performing various auxiliary services; and an SMTP gateway 122 for sending and receiving messages.
The information service 106 can be connected to ad server 128 and/or information item server 130 via the communication interface 1004. Ad server 128 can contain one or more advertisements 1020. The ad server 128 can receive input and return advertisements that can be relevant to the input. The information item server 130 can include one or more information items 1022. Similar to the ad server 128, the information server 130 can receive input and return informational items that can be relevant to the input.
Each of the above identified elements in
Although
As mentioned in the background section, an electronic document often includes one or more information entities that a reader may take further actions upon them while reading the document. For example, the electronic document may be an email message that includes a new address of his or her friend who has recently relocated to a different city. The reader may prefer to include the new address in his or her address book immediately. Sometimes, he or she may want to obtain the driving directions to the new address. Conventionally, the reader manually copies and pastes the new address into the address book. This is tedious and error-prone.
The following discussion is devoted to an alternative embodiment of the present invention. According to this embodiment, before serving an electronic document to a requesting user, the electronic document and a set of predetermined information entity types are first submitted to an information entity server. The server is responsible for extracting from the document information entities matching the predetermined information entity types. Next, the information entity server submits to one or more information item servers (e.g., ad server, map server, and weather forecast server, etc) requests corresponding to the extracted information entities to retrieve relevant information that might be of interest to the user. Finally, the relevant information and/or links to some of the relevant information are served to the requesting user together with the requested electronic document. For illustrative purposes, an email message is used as an exemplary document in the following discussion. But one skilled in the art will appreciate that the same techniques can be applied to other types of electronic documents such as web pages, documents, Instant Messaging (IM) messages, Short Message Service (SMS) messages, transcribed voice messages, and any combination thereof.
The communication network 1104 is connected to an email server 1110 on the server side. In some embodiments, the email server 1110 may have a structure similar to the information service 106 shown in
The information entity server 1120 includes an information entity engine 1122 that receives requests from and sends responses to the email server 1110. Within the information entity server 1120, there are one or more information entity modules (1124, 1126). Each module is responsible for identifying one or more information entities and collecting information related to the information entities from other sources. Generally speaking, these modules operate independently from each other in any order. In some embodiments, however, one module's operation may depend on the information entities identified by another module or modules. In such embodiments, the information entity engine 1122 is configured to sequentially execute the modules in an order consistent with the dependencies of one or more of the modules on the prior execution of other ones of the modules.
An information entity module (1124, 1126) may further include sub-modules: an information entity identifier (1124-2, 1126-2) and a relevant information collector (1124-4, 1126-4). The information entity identifier (1124-2, 1126-2) is responsible for identifying any occurrences of an information entity type in an email message content and then forwarding the identified information entities to the relevant information collector (1124-4, 1126-4). For each identified entity, the corresponding information collector (1124-4, 1126-4) makes an optional information request to one or more backend information item servers 1130 and/or advertisement servers 1140 to collect information items that are deemed relevant to the identified information entity.
In some embodiments, unless there are specified dependencies between different modules, the information entity modules process the content of a message (or a set of message) in an arbitrary order, or in parallel. Requests to backend information item servers 1130, 1140 may be made in parallel (e.g. during overlapping time periods), by the modules. In other embodiments requests to backend information item servers 1130, 1140 are made sequentially by the modules 1124, 1126, in same order that the modules are process the content of a message. After receiving responses to the backend requests, the modules associate the collected information items with the corresponding information entities and return the collected information items to the information entity engine 1122. The information entity engine 1122 compiles the responses from the different modules and generates an ultimate response to the email server 1110.
The server analyzes the message content based on the information entity type list (1204). By default, the information entity server is responsible for analyzing the message content against every information entity type unless the email server instructs otherwise. For example, the email server may determine for a particular message whether the information entity server 1120 should analyze the message to look for information entities matching a particular information entity type. The analysis by the information entity server includes identifying occurrences of each listed information entity type in the message content. An information entity module is invoked if one or more information entity types associated with the module appears in the information entity type list. Typically, information entity types that are closely related will be associated with the same information entity module. For example, physical address, email address and phone number are associated with a module responsible for any information entity type related to contact information.
In some embodiments, every invoked information entity module updates a data structure associated with the message and shared by all the modules. The data structure includes a list of annotations of the message being analyzed. In some embodiments, the data structure has an interface that enables quick iteration by the information entity modules and quick lookup of annotations in the list of annotations. Annotations associated with a particular information entity type within a particular range of bytes of the message can be easily identified in the data structure. There are at least two advantages of sharing the data structure among different modules. First, this allows the processing result of one module to be reused by a subsequent module, rather than having the subsequent module repeat the process. For example, if a message has been tokenized by one module, by adding an annotation to the data structure for each token identified in the message, a subsequent module can iterate over the tokenized annotations without re-tokenizing the message. Second, the shared data structure stores all information entities that have been found in the message so that each module can operate in a stateless mode, which simplifies the implementation of the information entity modules.
For each information entity identified in the message, a corresponding information entity module extracts it from the data structure (1206). Next, the information entity module submits an optional information request associated with the entity to a backend information source(s) (e.g., a map server) and retrieves related information provided by the backend information source(s) (1208). In some embodiments, the information entity module submits a search query to the backend information source(s) and the query includes at least one term corresponding to the information entity. From the query results, the information entity module selects the most relevant items and associates it with the information entity (1210). After all information entity modules have received responses to their respective requests, the information entity server generates an ultimate response containing all extracted information entities and their associated information (or a selected subset of the extracted information entities and their associated information) to the email server (1214). In some embodiments, the response includes display instructions for formatting and displaying one or more of the extracted information entities and their associated information at a client device.
In some other embodiments, an information entity module generates one or more links associated with the information entity. A link may contain a search query to a specific information source. For example, if the identified information entity is a product name, the link could be a search query prepared for a product search engine like the Froogle search engine. In this case, the information entity module does not submit information requests to backend information sources. Rather, links are provided to an end user and he or she only needs to click on a link to get the relevant information. In yet some other embodiments, the information entity module generates requests as well as links for an information entity and serves both types of responses to the end user. For example, if the identified entity is an address, it may be desired to serve to the end user both a thumbnail-style map and a link to driving directions in connection with the requested email message.
In some embodiments, the information entity server 1106 includes the following elements, or a subset or superset of such elements: an information entity engine 1122 for responding to a variety of requests from the email server 1110 returning targeted information based on identified information entities and one or more information entity modules (1124, 1126) for identifying information entities in a message and collecting information related to the information entities.
The information entity server 1106 can be connected to ad server 1140 and/or information item server 1130 via the communication interface 1804. Ad server 1140 can contain one or more advertisements 1820. The ad server 1140 can receive input and return advertisements that can be relevant to the input. The information item server 1130 can include one or more information items 1822. Similar to the ad server 1140, the information server 1130 can receive input and return informational items that can be relevant to the input.
Each of the above identified elements in
Although
The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/111,166, filed Apr. 20, 2005, entitled “System and Method for Targeting Information Based on Message Content” which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3566153 | Spencer, Jr. | Feb 1971 | A |
5109509 | Katayama et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5208748 | Flores et al. | May 1993 | A |
5216603 | Flores et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5613108 | Morikawa | Mar 1997 | A |
5724521 | Dedrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5724571 | Woods | Mar 1998 | A |
5734837 | Flores et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740549 | Reilly et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761689 | Rayson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5832502 | Durham et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848397 | Marsh et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5887133 | Brown et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5905863 | Knowles et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913040 | Rakavy et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918014 | Robinson | Jun 1999 | A |
5948058 | Kudoh et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman | Sep 1999 | A |
5959621 | Nawaz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963205 | Sotomayor | Oct 1999 | A |
5987454 | Hobbs | Nov 1999 | A |
6014502 | Moraes | Jan 2000 | A |
6021427 | Spagna et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026368 | Brown et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029164 | Birrell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044376 | Kurtzman, II | Mar 2000 | A |
6078914 | Redfern | Jun 2000 | A |
6085206 | Domini et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6115709 | Gilmour et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134532 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144944 | Kurtzman, II et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148332 | Brewer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151596 | Hosomi | Nov 2000 | A |
6167382 | Sparks et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6182063 | Woods | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182098 | Selker | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182122 | Berstis | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185551 | Birrell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6269361 | Davis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6330589 | Kennedy | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332127 | Bandera et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6350066 | Bobo, II | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356834 | Hancock et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6381465 | Chern et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396513 | Helfman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401075 | Mason et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408297 | Ohashi | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421694 | Nawaz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438564 | Morton et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449657 | Stanbach, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6493702 | Adar et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493703 | Knight et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505046 | Baker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507351 | Bixler | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522875 | Dowling et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6549957 | Hanson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571279 | Herz et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587835 | Treyz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594658 | Woods | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6594693 | Borwankar | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606644 | Ford et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6640239 | Gidwani | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654735 | Eichstaedt et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665668 | Sugaya et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6683627 | Ullmann et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6708205 | Sheldon et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714975 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725228 | Clark et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732152 | Lockhart et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6742042 | Holden et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745197 | McDonald | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757740 | Parekh et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757889 | Ito | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6771291 | DiStefano, III | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785869 | Berstis | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788769 | Waites | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6820081 | Kawai et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6834276 | Jensen et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847969 | Mathai et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847992 | Haitsuka et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6889361 | Bates et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6892196 | Hughes | May 2005 | B1 |
6947396 | Salmi | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6973481 | MacIntosh et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983139 | Dowling et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6983311 | Haitsuka et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6985882 | Del Sesto | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6993553 | Kaneko et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999941 | Agarwal | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013263 | Isaka et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7017173 | Armstrong et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031961 | Pitkow et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035903 | Baldonado | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039599 | Merriman | May 2006 | B2 |
7043690 | Bates et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7062572 | Hampton | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7069300 | Toyota et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7089278 | Churchill et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7107544 | Luke | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120668 | Manber et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136875 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7136915 | Rieger, III | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139850 | Amemiya et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143135 | Smith et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7171429 | Frieden et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188356 | Miura et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7203727 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215947 | Bowling et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7243080 | Bhadra | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7328242 | McCarthy et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7356772 | Brownholtz et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359936 | Gruen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376714 | Gerken | May 2008 | B1 |
7383307 | Kirkland et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7412437 | Moody et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421690 | Forstall et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433920 | Blagsvedt et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7478414 | Glusker et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7484175 | Kirkland | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487112 | Barnes, Jr. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7532890 | Davies et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7565534 | Starbuck et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7584208 | Spivack et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7584251 | Brown et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599852 | Bosarge et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7643352 | Chen | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7668832 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7693866 | Weaver et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7707283 | Tsunoda et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716593 | Durazo et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7730113 | Payette et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7788326 | Buchheit et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7827055 | Snodgrass et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7903099 | Baluja | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7904510 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912904 | Buchheit et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7949714 | Burnim | May 2011 | B1 |
7953741 | Shih et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8554852 | Burnim | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8850365 | Cumming | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20010016845 | Tribbensee | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010042100 | Guedalia et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047272 | Frietas et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047294 | Rothschild | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010054066 | Spitzer | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010775 | Rakavy et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010794 | Stanbach, Jr. et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020032771 | Gledge | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046099 | Frengut et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052925 | Kim et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073156 | Newman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078158 | Brown et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083140 | Shin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087631 | Sharma | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094868 | Tuck et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107735 | Henkin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116494 | Kocol | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165923 | Prince | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178225 | Madenberg et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188689 | Michael | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188699 | Ullman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194229 | Decime et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009385 | Tucciarone et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030020749 | Abu-Hakima et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037140 | Aaltonen | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050916 | Ortega et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055711 | Doherty | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069029 | Dowling et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088554 | Ryan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093315 | Sato | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101065 | Rohall et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110227 | O'Hagan | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135555 | Birrel et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145285 | Miyahira et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163537 | Rohall et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167310 | Moody et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177190 | Moody et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191689 | Bosarge et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195801 | Takakura et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229607 | Zellweger et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233419 | Beringer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040044735 | Hoblit | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040048604 | Idei | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054737 | Daniell | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059712 | Dean et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068435 | Braunzell | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078432 | Manber et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083133 | Nicholas et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083265 | Beringer | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093327 | Anderson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098488 | Mayers | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133564 | Gross et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153509 | Alcorn et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181580 | Baranshamaje | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199589 | Keohane et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199623 | Houri | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205141 | Goland | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210587 | Reysa | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040260710 | Marston et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260756 | Forstall et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267700 | Dumais et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004990 | Durazo et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015394 | McKeeth | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033657 | Herrington et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038861 | Lynn et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050027 | Yeh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060310 | Tong et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060643 | Glass et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076051 | Carobus et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050076132 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086598 | Marshall, III et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091320 | Kirsch et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102292 | Tamayo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108345 | Suzuki | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114781 | Brownholtz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130685 | Jenkin | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131715 | Trethewey | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131884 | Gross et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137939 | Calabria et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138002 | Giacobbe et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144157 | Moody et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144241 | Stata et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149397 | Morgenstern et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160107 | Liang | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165896 | Mooney | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177401 | Koeppel et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182765 | Liddy | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187823 | Howes | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198173 | Evans | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198256 | Moody et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216454 | Diab et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216516 | Calistri-Yeh et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222900 | Fuloria et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223058 | Buchheit et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223066 | Buchheit et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060020510 | Vest | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026046 | Yaron et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026593 | Canning et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031304 | Bagga et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064346 | Steenstra et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075445 | O'Kane | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080303 | Sargent et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085434 | Mah et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092920 | Karamchedu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123091 | Ho | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129455 | Shah | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129943 | Maguire | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149677 | Shahine et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167747 | Goodman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179127 | Randall | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184617 | Nicholas et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224750 | Davies et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248209 | Chiu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259473 | Li et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060294084 | Patel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005715 | LeVasseur et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033531 | Marsh | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047697 | Drewry et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050372 | Boyle | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067404 | Brown et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088801 | Levkovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088851 | Levkovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088852 | Levkovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070143411 | Costea et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143428 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070157119 | Bishop | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198639 | Litwin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070255791 | Bodlaender et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070294740 | Drake et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080147815 | Damm et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080275873 | Bosarge et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294524 | Badros et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080313292 | Forstall et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018917 | Chapman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100280903 | Barlin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299326 | Germaise | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110264750 | Fabre et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120226760 | Lewis | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0886228 | Dec 1998 | EP |
09-128407 | May 1997 | JP |
2001-222477 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002-359667 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-030216 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-108278 | Apr 2003 | JP |
WO 9721183 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 0023931 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0054201 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0161551 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0163512 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 03058519 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03067497 | Aug 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Comer, D. and Peterson, L., “Conversation-Based Mail,” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS) vol. 4, Issue 4, pp. 299-319, Nov. 1986. |
Bellotti, V et al., (2003), “Taking Email to Task: the design and evaluation of a task management centered email tool.” In Conference Proceedings on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2003), pp. 345-352, Apr. 5-10, 2003, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. |
Bellotti, V. et al., “Taskmaster: recasting email as task management,” PARC, CSCW '02 Workshop on Redesigning Email for the 21st Century. |
Flores, F. et al., “Computer Systems and the design of organizational interaction,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems., pp. 153-172, (1988). |
Shepherd, A. et al., “Strudel—an extensible electronic conversation toolkit,” Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles, California, United States, pp. 93-104. |
Venolia, G., et al., “Supporting Email Workflow,”Technical Report MSR-TR-2001-88, Microsoft Corporation, 10 pages (Sep. 2001). |
Winograd, T., (1987), “A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 3-30, (1987-1988). Earlier version presented at the Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work, Austin, pp. 203-220, Dec. 1986. |
Winograd, T., “Where the Action is,” pp. 256A-260, Byte, Dec. 1988. |
Zawinski, J., “Message Threading,” http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html, pp. 1-9 (1997-2000). |
Friedman, N., “Dashboard,” Ximian Inc., Jul. 25, 2003. |
AdForce, Inc., A Complete Guide to AdForce, Version 2.6, 1998. |
AdForce, Inc., S-1/A SEC Filing, May 6, 1999. |
AdKnowledge Campaign Manager: Reviewer's Guide, AdKnowledge, Aug. 1998. |
AdKnowledge Market Match Planner: Reviewer's Guide, AdKnowledge, May 1998. |
Ad-Star.com website archive from www. Archive.org, Apr. 12, 1997 and Feb. 1, 1997. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,073, Reexamination of Stone et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,061, Reexamination of Stone et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,069, Reexamination of Dean et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,068, Reexamination of Stone et al. |
Baseview Products, Inc., AdManagerPro Administration Manual v. 2.0, Dec. 1998. |
Baseview Products, Inc., ClassManagerPro Administration Manual v. 1.0.5, Feb. 1, 1997. |
Business Wire, “Global Network, Inc. Enters Into Agreement in Principle With Major Advertising Agency,” Oct. 4, 1999. |
Information Access Technologies, Inc., Aaddzz brochure, “The Best Way to Buy and Sell Web Advertising Space,” © 1997. |
Information Access Technologies, Inc., Aaddzz.com website archive from www. Archive.org, archived on Jan. 30, 1998. |
Zeff, R. et al., Advertising on the Internet, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, 1999. |
Dedrick, R., Interactive Electronic Advertising, IEEE, 1994. |
Dedrick, R., A Consumption Model for Targeted Electronic Advertising, Intel Architecture Labs, IEEE, 1995. |
Request for Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,240,025 B2, Control No. 95/001,073. |
Request for Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,446,045 B1, Control No. 95/001,061. |
Request for Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,249,059 B2, Control No. 95/001,069. |
Request for Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,829,587 B2, Control No. 95/001,068. |
Digital Envoy Press Releases, “Double click and Digital Envoy Partner to Offer Advanced Geo-Targeting Solutions,” Mar. 23, 2003, 2 pages. |
NetGravity AdServer AdMaster's Guide, Mar. 11, 1997, 59 pages. |
About Microsoft Word Screen Shot, May 28, 2007, 1 pg. |
AdSense, http://web.archive.org/web/20050112192021/https://www.google.com/adsense/afc-online-overview, Jan. 12, 2005, 3 pgs. |
Apple Computer Inc., Mail 1.3.3 Help: Checking Spelling in Email, Aug. 31, 2004, 1 pg. |
Apple Computer Inc., Mac Mail Utility Screenshot, Aug. 18, 2004, 1 pg. |
Courter, Mastering Microsoft Office 2000—Professional Edition, (no date) p. 5. |
Courter, Mastering Microfost Office 2000—Professional Edition, (no date) pp. 36-37 and 92-94. |
Givens, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse letter: An Open Letter to Google Regarding its Proposed Gmail Service, Apr. 6, 2004, www.privacyrights.org/ar/GmailLetter.htm, 4 pgs. |
Gmail beta About Gmail, Apr. 20, 2004, 2 pgs. |
Gmail beta Sneak Peek of Conversation View, Apr. 20, 2004, 1 pg. |
Gmail beta Sneak Peek of Gmail Inbox, Apr. 20, 2004, 1 pg. |
Google search results page for outlook 2003 conversation view, downloaded Nov. 7, 2013, 2 pgs. |
Google. European Search Report, EP 11172427.4, Dec. 21, 2011, 6 pgs. |
Google, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2005/006826, Oct. 4, 2006, 4 pgs. |
Google, International Search Report/Written Opinion, PCT/US2005/006826, Jun. 26, 2006, 7 pgs. |
Google, International Search Report/Written Opinion, PCT/US2005/010137, Jun. 3, 2005, 3 pgs. |
Google, Notice of Acceptance, Australian Patent Application No. 2011203058, Jan. 6, 2012, 3 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, Australian Patent Application No. 2011201989, Apr. 12, 2012, 3 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, Australian Patent Application No. 2011201991, Mar. 8, 2012, 2 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, Australian Patent Application No. 2011201992, Aug. 16, 2012, 3 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, Australian Patent Application No. 2011201993, Feb. 28, 2012, 2 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, Australian Patent Application No. 2011201994, Mar. 8, 2012, 2 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, Australian Patent Application No. 2011203058, Oct. 31, 2011, 1 pg. |
Google, Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 200580016413.8, Jul. 2, 2012, 3 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 200580016413.8, Dec. 19, 2011, 3 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, JP 2010-275595, Jul. 6, 2012, 4 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, Korean Patent Application No. 2006-7022840, Jan. 26, 2012, 4 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, KR 2011-7017094, Sep. 26, 2011, 5 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, KR 2011-7017095, Sep. 29, 2011, 5 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, KR 2011-7017096, Oct. 4, 2011, 4 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, KR 2011-7017098, Oct. 4, 2011, 3 pgs. |
Google, Office Action, KR 2011-7017102, Oct. 4, 2011, 4 pgs. |
Google, Supplemental European Search Report, EP 05724384.2, Mar. 16, 2009, 5 pgs. |
Gorman, The Next Major Email Domain: Gmail.com, Jun. 2004, 1 pg. |
Jackman, Use these five tips to help control how Outlook 2003 displays e-mail, Sep. 22, 2004, 11 pgs. |
Lawrence, Context and Page Analysis for Improved Web Search, Oct. 31, 1998, 9 pgs. |
News from Google, Google Gets the Message, Launches Gmail, Apr. 1, 2004, http://googlepress.blogspot.com/2004/04/google-gets-message-launches-gmail.html, downloaded Nov. 9, 2012, 2 pgs. |
O'Hara, Easy Microsoft Office Outlook 2003, Sep. 18, 2003, 44 pgs. |
O'Reilly, The Fuss About Gmail and Privacy: Nine Reasons Why It's Bogus, Apr. 16, 2004, http://oreilly.com/lpt/w1g/4707, 4 pgs. |
Resnick, Network Working Group, RFC 2822, Apr. 2011, 70 pgs. |
Russel, Special Edition Using Microsoft Office Outlook 2003, Sep. 25, 2003, 102 pgs. |
Screenshot of Reply to Message in Lotus Notes 6.5, Aug. 6, 2007, 1 pg. |
Syroid, Outlook 2000 in a Nutshell, May 2, 2000, O'Reilly, 1-66 pgs. |
Thies, Special Report: How to Prosper With the New Google, 2004, 17 pgs. |
Tobias, Dan's Mail Format Site, Feb. 2, 2009, 6 pgs. |
Tyson, Sam's Teach Yourself Microsoft Outlook 2000 in 24 Hours, 1999, 2 pgs. |
View messages by conversation or thread, anonymous, downloaded Nov. 6, 2013, http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook-help/view-messages-by-conversation-or-thread-HA001135667.aspx, 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11111166 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 11215543 | US |