Patent Grant
8503086
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system for assessing movement and agility skills and, in particular, to a wireless position tracker for continuously tracking and determining player position during movement in a defined physical space through player interaction with tasks displayed in a computer generated, specially translated virtual space for the quantification of the player's movement and agility skills based on time and distance traveled in the defined physical space.
2. The Related Art
Sports specific skills can be classified into two general conditions:
Valid testing and training of sport-specific skills requires that the player be challenged by unplanned cues which prompt player movement over distances and directions representative of actual game play. The player's optimum movement path should be selected based on visual assessment of his or her spatial relationship with opposing players and/or game objective. A realistic simulation must include a sports relevant environment. Test methods prompting the player to move to fixed ground locations are considered artificial. Nor are test methods employing static or singular movement cues such as a light or a sound consistent with accurate simulations of actual competition in many sports.
To date, no accurate, real time model of the complex, constantly changing, interactive relationship between offensive and defensive opponents engaging in actual competition exists. Accurate and valid quantification of sport-specific movement capabilities necessitates a simulation having fidelity with real world events.
At the most primary level, sports such as basketball, football and soccer can be characterized by the moment to moment interaction between competitors in their respective offensive and defensive roles. It is the mission of the player assuming the defensive role to “contain”, “guard”, or neutralize the offensive opponent by establishing and maintaining a real-time synchronous relationship with the opponent. For example, in basketball, the defensive player attempts to continually impede the offensive player's attempts to drive to the basket by blocking with his or her body the offensive player's chosen path, while in soccer the player controlling the ball must maneuver the ball around opposing players.
The offensive player's mission is to create a brief asynchronous event, perhaps of only a few hundred milliseconds in duration, so that the defensive player's movement is no longer in “phase” with the offensive player's. During this asynchronous event, the defensive player's movement no longer mirrors, i.e., is no longer synchronous with, his or her offensive opponent. At that moment, the defensive player is literally “out of position” and therefore is in a precarious position, thereby enhancing the offensive player's chances of scoring. The offensive player can create an asynchronous event in a number of ways. The offensive player can “fake out” or deceive his or her opponent by delivering purposefully misleading information as to his or her immediate intentions. Or the offensive player can “overwhelm” his opponent by abruptly accelerating the pace of the action to levels exceeding the defensive player's movement capabilities.
To remain in close proximity to an offensive opponent, the defensive player must continually anticipate or “read” the offensive player's intentions. An adept defensive player will anticipate the offensive player's strategy or reduce the offensive player's options to those that can easily be contained. This must occur despite the offensive player's attempts to disguise his or her actual intentions with purposely deceptive and unpredictable behavior. In addition to being able to “read”, i.e., quickly perceive and interpret the intentions of the offensive player, the defensive player must also possess adequate sport-specific movement skills to establish and maintain the desired (from the perspective of the defensive player) synchronous spatial relationship.
These player-to-player interactions are characterized by a continual barrage of useful and purposefully misleading visual cues offered by the offensive player and constant reaction and maneuvering by the defensive participant. Not only does the defensive player need to successfully interpret visual cues “offered” by the offensive player, but the offensive player must also adeptly interpret visual cues as they relate to the defensive player's commitment, balance and strategy. Each player draws from a repertoire of movement skills which includes balance and postural control, the ability to anticipate defensive responses, the ability to generate powerful, rapid, coordinated movements, and reaction times that exceed that of the opponent. These sport-specific movement skills are often described as the functional or motor related components of physical fitness.
The interaction between competitors frequently appears almost chaotic, and certainly staccato, as a result of the “dueling” for advantage. The continual abrupt, unplanned changes in direction necessitate that the defensive player maintain control over his or her center of gravity throughout all phases of movement to avoid over committing. Consequently, movements of only fractions of a single step are common for both the defensive and offensive players. Such abbreviated movements insure that peak or high average velocities are seldom, if ever, achieved. Accordingly, peak acceleration and power are more sensitive measures of performance in the aforementioned scenario. Peak acceleration of the center of mass can be achieved more rapidly than peak velocity, often in one step or less, while power can relate the acceleration over a time interval, making comparisons between players more meaningful.
At a secondary level, all sports situations include decision-making skills and the ability to focus on the task at hand. The present invention simulation trains participants in these critical skills. Therefore, athletes learn to be “smarter” players due to increased attentional skills, intuition, and critical, sports related reasoning.
Only through actual game play, or truly accurate simulation of game play, can the ability to correctly interpret and respond to sport specific visual cues be honed. The same requirement applies to the refinement of the sport-specific components of physical fitness that is essential for adept defensive and offensive play. These sport-specific components include reaction time, balance, stability, agility and first step quickness.
Through task-specific practice, athletes learn to successfully respond to situational uncertainties. Such uncertainties can be as fundamental as the timing of the starter's pistol, or as complex as detecting and interpreting continually changing, “analog” stimuli presented by an opponent. To be task-specific, the type of cues delivered to the player must simulate those experienced in the player's sport. Task-specific cuing can be characterized, for the purposes of this document, as either dynamic or static.
Dynamic cuing delivers continual, “analog” feedback to the player by being responsive to, and interactive with, the player. Dynamic cuing is relevant to sports where the player must possess the ability to “read” and interpret “telegraphing” kinematic detail in his or her opponent's activities. Players must also respond to environmental cues such as predicting the path of a ball or projectile for the purposes of intercepting or avoiding it. In contrast, static cuing is typically a single discreet event, and is sport relevant in sports such a track and field or swimming events. Static cues require little cerebral processing and do not contribute to an accurate model of sports where there is continuous flow of stimuli necessitating sequential, real time responses by the player. At this level, the relevant functional skill is reaction time, which can be readily enhanced by the present invention's simulation.
In sports science and coaching, numerous tests of movement capabilities and reaction time are employed. However, these do not subject the player to the type and frequency of sport-specific dynamic cues requisite to creating an accurate analog of actual sports competition described above.
For example, measures of straight-ahead speed such as the 100-meter and 40 yard dash only subject the player to one static cue, i.e., the sound of the gun at the starting line. Although the test does measure a combination of reaction time and speed, it is applicable to only one specific situation (running on a track) and, as such, is more of a measurement of capacity, not skill. In contrast, the player in many other sports, whether in a defensive or offensive role, is continually bombarded with cues that provide both useful and purposely misleading information as to the opponent's immediate intentions. These dynamic cues necessitate constant, real time changes in the player's movement path and velocity; such continual real-time adjustments preclude a player from reaching maximum high speeds as in a 100-meter dash. Responding successfully to dynamic cues places constant demand on a player's agility and the ability to assess or read the opposing player intentions.
There is another factor in creating an accurate analog of sports competition. Frequently, a decisive or pivotal event such as the creation of an asynchronous event does not occur from a preceding static or stationary position by the players. For example, a decisive event most frequently occurs while the offensive player is already moving and creates a phase shift by accelerating the pace or an abrupt change in direction. Consequently, it is believed that the most sensitive indicators of athletic prowess occur during abrupt changes in vector direction or pace of movement from “preexisting movement”. All known test methods are believed to be incapable of making meaningful measurements during these periods.
Known in the art are various types of virtual reality or quasi virtual reality systems used for entertainment purposes or for measuring physical exertion. Examples of such systems are U.S. Pat. No. 5,616,078, to Oh, entitled “Motion-Controlled Video Entertainment System”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,423,554, to Davis, entitled “Virtual Reality Game Method and Apparatus”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,638,300, to Johnson, entitled “Golf Swing Analysis System”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,524,637, to Erickson, entitled “Interactive System for Measuring Physiological Exertion”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,469,740, to French et al., entitled “Interactive Video Testing and Training System”; U.S. Pat. No. 4,751,642, to Silva et al., entitled “Interactive Sports Simulation System with Physiological Sensing and Psychological Conditioning”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,239,463, to Blair et al., entitled “Method and Apparatus for Player Interaction with Animated Characters and Objects”; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,229,756, to Kosugi et al., entitled “Image Control Apparatus”. These prior art systems lack realism in their presentations and/or provide no measurement or inadequate measurement of physical activity.
The present invention provides a system for quantifying physical motion of a player or subject and providing feedback to facilitate training and athletic performance. A preferred system creates an accurate simulation of sport to quantify and train several novel performance constructs by employing: sensing electronics (preferably optical sensing electronics as discussed below) for determining, in essentially real time, the player's three dimensional positional changes in three or more degrees of freedom (three dimensions); and computer controlled sport specific cuing that evokes or prompts sport specific responses from the player.
In certain protocols of the present invention, the sport specific cuing could be characterized as a “virtual opponent”, that is preferably—but not necessarily—kinematically and anthropomorphically correct in form and action. Though the virtual opponent could assume many forms, the virtual opponent is responsive to, and interactive with, the player in real time without any perceived visual lag. The virtual opponent continually delivers and/or responds to stimuli to create realistic movement challenges for the player. The movement challenges are typically comprised of relatively short, discrete movement legs, sometimes amounting to only a few inches of displacement of the player's center of mass. Such movement legs are without fixed start and end positions, necessitating continual tracking of the player's position for meaningful assessment.
The virtual opponent can assume the role of either an offensive or defensive player. In the defensive role, the virtual opponent maintains a synchronous relationship with the player relative to the player's movement in the physical world. Controlled by the computer to match the capabilities of each individual player, the virtual opponent “rewards” instances of improved player performance by allowing the player to outmaneuver (“get by”) him. In the offensive role, the virtual opponent creates asynchronous events to which the player must respond in time frames set by the computer depending on the performance level of the player. In this case, the virtual opponent “punishes” lapses in the player's performance, i.e., the inability of the player to precisely follow a prescribed movement path both in terms of pace and precision, by outmaneuvering the player.
It is important to note that dynamic cues allow for moment to moment (instantaneous) prompting of the player's vector direction, transit rate and overall positional changes. In contrast to static cues, dynamic cues enable precise modulation of movement challenges resulting from stimuli constantly varying in real time.
Regardless of the virtual opponent's assumed role (offensive or defensive), when the protocol employs the virtual opponent, the virtual opponent's movement cues are “dynamic” so as to elicit sports specific player responses. This includes continual abrupt explosive changes of direction and maximal accelerations and decelerations over varying vector directions and distances.
Further summarizing broad aspects of the invention, a testing and training system comprises a continuous tracking system for determining changes in an overall physical location of the player, in a defined physical space; and a computer operatively coupled to the tracking system, for updating in real time a player virtual location in a virtual space corresponding to the physical location of the player in the physical space, for updating a view of the virtual space, and for providing at least one indicia of performance of the player moving in the physical space, wherein the at least one indicia is or is derived from a measure of a movement parameter of the player. According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the at least one indicia of performance that is or is derived from a measure of a movement parameter of the player includes an indicia selected from the group consisting of a measure of work performed by the player, a measure of the player's velocity, a measure of the player's power, a measure of the player's ability to maximize spatial differences over time between the player and a virtual protagonist, a time in compliance, a measure of the player's acceleration, a measure of the player's ability to rapidly change direction of movement, a measure of dynamic reaction time, a measure of elapsed time from presentation of a cue to the player's initial movement in response to the cue, a measure of direction of the initial movement relative to a desired response direction, a measure of cutting ability, a measure of phase lag time, a measure of first step quickness, a measure of jumping or bounding, a measure of cardio-respiratory status, and a measure of sports posture.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method for testing and training includes the steps of tracking an overall physical location of a player within a defined physical space; updating in real time a player virtual location corresponding to the physical location of the player; updating in real time a view of the virtual space; and providing at least one indicia of performance of the player moving in the physical space, the at least one indicia being or being derived from a measure of a movement parameter of the player.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a game system for two or more players includes a continuous three-dimensional tracking system for each of the players for determining changes in an overall physical location of the respective player in a respective defined physical space; and a computer operatively coupled to the tracking systems for updating in real time player virtual locations in a virtual space corresponding to the physical locations of the players.
According to a further aspect of the invention, a testing and training system for assessing the ability of a player to complete a task, includes tracking means for determining the position of the player within a defined physical space within which the player moves to undertake the task, based on at least two Cartesian coordinates; display means operatively coupled to the tracking means for displaying in a virtual space a player icon representing the instantaneous position of the player therein in scaled translation to the position of the player in the defined physical space; means operatively coupled to the display means for depicting in the virtual space a protagonist; means for defining an interactive task between the position of the player and the position of the protagonist icon in the virtual space; and means for assessing the ability of the player in completing the task based on quantities of distance and time, wherein the task comprises a plurality of segments requiring sufficient movement of the player in the defined physical space to provide quantification of bilateral vector performance of the player in completing the task.
According to a still further aspect of the invention, a testing and training system includes tracking means for tracking a user's position within a physical space in three dimensions; display means operatively linked to the tracking means for indicating the user's position within the physical space in essentially real time; means for defining an interactive protocol for the user; means for measuring in essentially real time vertical displacements of the user's center of gravity as the user responds to interactive protocols; means for calculating the user's movement velocities and/or accelerations during performance of the protocols; and means for assessing the user's performance in executing the physical activity.
According to another aspect of the invention, a testing and training system includes tracking means for tracking a user's movement in three-degrees-of-freedom during his performance of protocols which include unplanned movements over various vector distances; display means operatively linked to the tracking means for indicating the user's position within the physical space in essentially real time; means for defining a physical activity for the user operatively connected to the display means; and means calculating in essentially real-time the user's movement accelerations and decelerations; means categorizing each movement leg to a particular vector; and means for displaying feedback of bilateral performance.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a testing and training system includes tracking means for tracking a user's position within a physical space in three dimensions; means for displaying a view of a virtual space proportional in dimensions to the physical space; means for displaying, in essentially real time, a user icon in the virtual space at a location which is a spatially correct representation of the user's position within the physical space; means for defining a physical activity for the user operatively connected to the display means; and means for assessing the user's performance in executing the physical activity.
According to a further aspect of the invention, a testing and training system includes a tracking system for providing a set of three dimensional coordinates of a user within a physical space; a computer operatively linked to the tracking system to receive the coordinates from the tracking system and indicate the user's position within the physical space on a display in essentially real time; and wherein the computer includes a program to define a physical activity for the user and measure the user's performance in executing the activity, to calculate the user's movement velocities and/or accelerations during performance of the protocols, and to determine a user's dynamic posture.
According to a still further aspect of the invention, a testing and training system includes a tracking system for providing a set of three dimensional coordinates of a user within a physical space during performance of protocols including unplanned movements over various vector distances; a computer operatively linked to the tracking system to receive the coordinates from the tracking system and indicate the user's position within the physical space on a display in essentially real time, and to calculate in essentially real-time the user's movement accelerations and decelerations in executing the activity; and means for displaying feedback of bilateral performance.
According to another aspect of the invention, a reactive power training system includes a reactive training device which provides cues to elicit responsive movements of a subject moves in at least two dimensions, and a resistive training device. The reactive power training device and the strength training device are used in a training sequence.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a method of reactive power training includes performing a training sequence which includes reactive training bouts on a reactive training device alternated with training on one or more resistive training devices.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the invention comprises the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative embodiments of the invention. These embodiments are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed. Other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
In the annexed drawings:
Tracking and Display Systems
Referring now in detail to the drawings,
Referring additionally to
The player icon 32 may represent a person or a portion thereof. Alternatively it may represent an animal or some other real or imaginary creature or object. The player icon 32 may interact with a protagonist icon 34 representing a protagonist (also referred to as an avatar or virtual opponent) in the performance of varying tasks or games to be described below.
The protagonist icon may be a representation of a person. Alternatively the protagonist icon may be a representation of another object or may be an abstract object such as a shape.
The system 10 assesses and quantifies agility and movement skills by continuously tracking the player in the defined physical space 12 through continuous measurement of Cartesian coordinate positions. By scaling translation to the virtual space 30, the player icon 32 is represented in a spatially correct position and can interact with the protagonist icon 34 such that movement related to actual distance and time required by a player 36 (also known as an athlete or a subject) to travel in the physical space 12 can be quantified. The player icon 32 is at a player virtual location in virtual space, and the protagonist icon 34 is at a protagonist virtual location in virtual space.
The defined physical space 12 may be any available area, indoors or outdoors of sufficient size to allow the player to undertake the movements for assessing and quantifying distance and time measurements relevant to the player's conditioning, sport and ability. A typical physical space 12 may be an indoor facility such as a basketball or handball court where about a 20 foot by 20 foot area with about a 10 foot ceiling clearance can be dedicated for the training and testing. It will be appreciated that the system 10 may be adaptable to physical spaces of various sizes.
Inasmuch as the system is portable, the system may be transported to multiple sites for specific purposes. For relevant testing of sports skills on outdoor surfaces, such as football or baseball, where the player is most relevantly assessed under actual playing conditions, i.e., on a grass surface and in athletic gear, the system may be transported to the actual playing field for use.
The optical sensors 14, 16 and processor 18 may take the form of commercially available tracking systems. Preferably the system 10 uses an optical sensing system available as a modification of the DynaSight system from Origin Instruments of Grand Prairie Tex. Such a system uses a pair of optical sensors, i.e., trackers, mounted about 30 inches apart on a support mast centered laterally with respect to the defined physical space 12 at a distance sufficiently outside the front boundary 40 to allow the sensors 14, 16 to track movement in the desired physical space. The processor 18 communicates position information to an application program in a host computer through a serial port. The host computer is provided with a driver program available from Origin which interfaces the DynaSight system with the application program.
The sensors 14, 16, operating in the near infrared frequency range, interact with a passive or active reflector or beacon 38 worn by the player 36. The reflector or beacon 38 (collectively herein referred to as a marker) is preferably located at or near the center of mass of the player 36, although it may be located elsewhere relative to the player. For example the reflector or beacon may be attached to a belt which is worn about the waist of the player. The sensors report positions of the reflector or beacon 38 in three dimensions relative to a fiducial mark midway between the sensors. The fiducial mark is the origin of the default coordinate system.
Another suitable tracking system is the MacReflex Motion Measurement System from Qualisys.
As is evident, a skilled person will recognize that many other suitable tracking systems may be substituted for or used in addition to the optical tracking systems described above. For example, known electromagnetic, acoustic and video/optical technologies may be employed. Sound waves such as ultrasonic waves, or light waves in the visible or infrared spectra, may be propagated through the air between the player and the sensor(s) and utilized to track the player. Such waves may be transmitted by an external source and reflected off of a passive reflector worn by the player. It will be understood that such waves may reflect off of the player or his or her clothing, dispensing with the need for the player to wear a passive sensor.
Alternatively, the player may wear an active emitter which emits sound or light waves. Such an emitter may be battery operated, and may continuously emit sound or light waves when turned on. Alternatively, the emitter may emit waves only in response to an external signal or stimulus.
Multiple reflecting or emitting elements may be incorporated in a single reflector or emitter. Such multiple elements may be used to aid in tracking the location of the player. In an exemplary embodiment, three spaced-apart infrared emitting elements are incorporated in an emitter worn around the player's waist. The emitting elements are activated intermittently on a rotating basis at a known frequency. Information on the relative timing of the signals received from the various emitting elements allows the player to be tracked.
Alternatively or in addition such multiple elements may be used to track the orientation of the player's body as well as his or her position. For example, twisting of the player's body may be detected independent of the movement of the player by relative motion of the elements.
It will be appreciated further that one or more cameras or other image capturing devices may be used to continuously view the physical space. Image analysis techniques may be used to determine the position of the player from these images. Such image analysis techniques may for example include edge tracking techniques for detecting the location of the player relative to the background, and tracking of an item worn by the player, such a distinctively colored badge.
Any of the above such systems should provide an accurate determination of the players location in at least two coordinates and preferably three.
As is evident from the foregoing, tracking means used in the invention include all such tracking systems described above which are suitable for use in the invention.
In a particular embodiment, the position-sensing hardware tracks the player 36 in the defined physical space 12 at a sample rate of 500 Hz, with an absolute position accuracy of one inch or better in all dimensions over a tracking volume of approximately 432 cubic feet (9 ft. W×8 ft D×6 ft. H).
In the described embodiment, the player icon 32 is displayed on the monitor 28 in the corresponding width, lateral x axis, height, y axis and depth, or fore-aft z axis and over time t, to create a four dimensional space-time virtual world. For tasks involving vertical movement, tracking height, y axis, is required. The system 10 determines the coordinates of the player 36 in the defined physical space 12 in essentially real time and updates current position without any perceived lag between actual change and displayed change in location in the virtual space 30, preferably at an update rate in excess of about 20 Hz. A video update rate approximately 30 Hz, with measurement latency less than 30 milliseconds, has been found to serve as an acceptable, real-time, feedback tool for human movement. However, it is more preferable for the update rate be even higher, in excess of about 50 Hz, or even more preferably in excess of 70 Hz.
The monitor 28 should be sufficiently large to enable the player to view clearly the virtual space 30. The virtual space 30 is a spatially correct representation of the physical space as generated by the computer 22. For a 20 foot by 20 foot working field, a 27-inch diagonal screen or larger allows the player to perceptively relate to the correlation between the physical and virtual spaces. An acceptable monitor is a Mitsubishi 27″ Multiscan Monitor. It will be appreciated that other display devices, such as projection displays, liquid crystal displays, or virtual reality goggles or headsets, may also be employed to display a view of the virtual reality space.
The computer 22 receives the signal for coordinates of the player's location in the physical space 12 from the processor 18 and transmits a signal to the monitor 28 for displaying the player icon in scaled relationship in the virtual space 30. An acceptable computer is a Compaq Pentium PC. Other computers using a Pentium processor, a Pentium II processor, or other suitable processors would also be acceptable. In other words, the player icon 32 typically will be positioned in the computer-generated virtual space 30 at the x, y, z coordinates corresponding to the player's actual location in the physical space 12. However, it will be appreciated that the player icon may be placed in the virtual space at location(s) other than those corresponding to the player's location in physical space.
As the player 36 changes location within the physical space 12, the player icon 32 is repositioned accordingly in the virtual space 30. The repositioning is taken into account in an updated view fed to the display 28. In addition, past positions of the player icon 32 may be represented in the display. For example, “ghosts”, reduced brightness images of the player icon, may be displayed at locations where the player has recently been. This gives an indication of the recent path of motion of the player. Alternatively, the recent motion of the player may be indicated by a line trace which fades in intensity over time. Such indications may be used only for certain parts of a player's motion—for example only for jumps or leaps.
The computer 22 may retain a record of some or all of the data regarding the player's position on a data storage device such as hard disk or a writeable optical disk. This retained data may be in raw form, with the record containing the actual positions of the player at given times. Alternatively, the data may be processed before being recorded, for example with the accelerations of the player at various times being recorded.
To create tasks that induce the player 36 to undertake certain movements, a protagonist icon 34 is displayed in the computer-generated virtual space 30 by the computer software. The protagonist icon 34 serves to induce, prompt and lead the player 36 through various tasks, such as testing and training protocols in an interactive game-like format that allows the assessment and quantification of movement and agility skills related to actual distance traveled and elapsed time in the physical space 12 to provide physics-based vector and scalar information.
The protagonist icon 34 may be interactive with the player 36. For example, an interception task allows the player icon 32 and the protagonist icon 34 to interact until the two icons occupy the same or a similar location, whence the task ends. An evasion task, on the other hand, involves interaction of the player icon 32 and the protagonist icon 34 until the two icons have attained a predetermined separation. As used herein the protagonist icon is the graphic representation with which the player interacts, and defines the objective of the task. Other collision-based icons, such as obstacles, barriers, walls and the like may embellish the task, but are generally secondary to the objective being defined by the protagonist.
The protagonist icon 34 may have varying attributes. For example, the protagonist icon may be dynamic, rather than stationary, in that its location changes with time under the control of the software thereby requiring the player to determine an ever changing interception or evasion path to complete the task.
Further, the protagonist icon can be intelligent, programmed to be aware of the player's position in the computer-generated virtual space 30 and to intercept or evade according to the objectives of the task. Such intelligent protagonist icons are capable of making course correction changes in response to changes in the position of the player icon 32 in much the same manner as conventional video games wherein the targets are responsive to the icon under the player's control, the difference being that the player's icon does correspond to the player's actual position in a defined physical space.
The foregoing provides a system for assessing movement skills and agility skills. Movement skills are generally characterized in terms of the shortest time to achieve the distance objective. They can be further characterized by direction of movement with feedback, quantification and assessment being provided in absolute units, i.e., distance/time unit, or as a game score indicative of the player's movement capabilities related to physics-based information including speed, velocity, acceleration, deceleration and displacement. Agility is generally characterized as the ability to quickly and efficiently change body position and direction while undertaking specific movement patterns. The results also are reported in absolute units, with success determined by the elapsed time to complete the task.
An exemplary software flow chart for the foregoing tasks is shown in
To start the task routine, the player is prompted to a starting position for the task and upon reaching this position, the protagonist(s) and the obstacle(s) for the task are generated on the display. The protagonist moves on the display in step 90, in a trajectory dependent on the setup definition. For an interception routine, the player moves in a path which the player determines will result in the earliest interception point with the protagonist in accordance with the player's ability. During player movement, the player icon is generated and continually updated, in scaled translation in the virtual space to the player's instantaneous position in the defined physical space. Movement continues until player contact with the protagonist icon in step 92, resulting in interception in step 94, or until the protagonist contacts a boundary of the virtual space corresponding to the boundary of the defined physical space, 96. In the former case, if interception has occurred, a new protagonist appears on a new trajectory, 97. The player icon's position is recorded, 98, the velocity vectors calculated and recorded, and a score or assessment noted on the display. The system then determines if the task objectives have been met, 100, and for a single task, the final score is computed and displayed, 102, as well as information related to time and distance traveled in completing the task, and the session ends, 104.
In the event the player does not intercept the protagonist icon prior to the latter contacting a virtual space boundary corresponding to the boundary on the defined physical space, the direction of the protagonist is changed dependent on the setup definition, and the pursuit of the protagonist by the player continues as set forth above.
Concurrently with the player pursuit, in the event that obstacles have been selected in the setup definition, the same are displayed, 110, and the player must undertake a movement path to avoid these obstacles. For a single segment task, if the player contacts the obstacle, 112, the obstacle is highlighted, 114, and the routine is completed and scored as described above. In the event a moving obstacle was selected in the setup definition, if the obstacle strikes a boundary, 116, the obstacle's direction is changed, 118, and the task continues.
For a multiple segment task, if the obstacle is contacted, the protagonist's direction changes and the movements continue. Similarly, upon interception for a multiple segment task, a new protagonist trajectory is initiated and the obstacles also may be reoriented. The routine then continues until the objectives of the task have been met and the session completed.
The tasks are structured to require the player to move forward, backward, left and right, and optionally vertically. The player's movement is quantified as to distance and direction dependent on the sampling rate and the update rate of the system. For each sampling period, the change in position is calculated. At the end of the session, these samples are totaled and displayed for the various movement vectors.
For an avoidance task wherein the objective of the session is to avoid a protagonist seeking to intercept the player, the aforementioned is appropriately altered. Thus if the player is intercepted by the protagonist, the session ends for a single segment task and the time and distance related information is calculated and displayed. For multiple segment tasks, the protagonist trajectory has a new origin and the session continues for the defined task until completed or terminated.
An example of a functional movement skills test is illustrated in
In one embodiment, the player 36 is prompted to the starting position 52.
When the player reaches such position, the three hoops 50 appear representing the 50th percentile hop distances for the player's classification, and after a slight delay the first hoop is highlighted indicating the start of the test. The player then executes the first hop with the player's movement toward the first hoop being depicted in essentially real-time on the display. When the player lands after completion of the first hop this position is noted and stored on the display until completion of the test and the second hoop and third hoop are sequentially highlighted as set forth above. At the end of the three hops, the player's distances will be displayed with reference to normative data.
A test for agility assessment is illustrated in
As will be apparent from the above embodiment, the system provides a unique measurement of the player's visual observation and assesses skills in a sport simulation wherein the player is required to intercept or avoid the protagonist based on visual observation of the constantly changing spatial relationship with the protagonist. Additionally, excursions in the Y-plane can be quantified during movement as a measure of an optimal stance of the player.
The foregoing and other capabilities of the system are further illustrated by reference to
Another protocol is a back and forth hop test. Therein, the task is to hop back and forth on one leg over a virtual barrier displayed in the computer-generated virtual space. The relevant information upon completion of the session would be the amplitude measured on each hop which indicates obtaining a height sufficient to clear the virtual barrier. Additionally, the magnitude of limb oscillations experienced upon landing could be assessed. In this regard, the protocol may only measure the vertical distance achieved in a single or multiple vertical jump.
The aforementioned system accurately, and in essentially real time, measures the absolute three dimensional displacements over time of the body's center of gravity when the sensor marker is appropriately located on the player's mass center. Measuring absolute displacements in the vertical plane as well as the horizontal plane enables assessment of both movement skills and movement efficiency.
In many sports, it is considered desirable for the player to maintain a consistent elevation of his center of gravity above the playing surface. Observation of excursions of the player's body center of gravity in the fore-aft (Z) during execution of tests requiring solely lateral movements (X) would be considered inefficient. For example, displacements in the player's vertical (Y) plane during horizontal movements that exceed certain preestablished parameters could be indicative of movement inefficiencies.
In a further protocol using this information, the protagonist icon functions as an aerobics instructor directing the player through a series of aerobic routines. The system can also serve as an objective physiological indicator of physical activity or work rate during free body movement in essentially real time. Such information provides three benefits: (1) enables interactive, computer modulation of the workout session by providing custom movement cues in response to the player's current level of physical activity; (2) represents a valid and unique criteria to progress the player in his training program; and (3) provides immediate, objective feedback during training for motivation, safety and optimized training. Such immediate, objective feedback of physical activity is generally missing in current aerobics programs, particularly in unsupervised home programs.
Quantification of Performance-Related Parameters
In certain embodiments of the present invention, performance-related physical activity parameters related to movement (indicia derived from movement parameters), including calories burned, are monitored and quantified. The repetitive drudgery of conventional stationary exercise equipment that currently measures calories, heart rate, etc. is replaced by the excitement of three-dimensional movement in interactive response to virtual reality challenges presented on the monitor of the inventive system. Excitement is achieved in part by the scaling transformation achieved by the present invention, through which positional changes by the user moving in real space are represented in scaled relationship in the virtual world presented on the monitor.
Performance-related parameters measured and/or quantified by various embodiments of the present invention include those related to (a) determining and training a user's optimal dynamic posture; (b) the relationship between heart rate and physical activity; (c) quantifying quickness, i.e., acceleration and deceleration; and (d) and quantifying energy expenditure during free ranging activities.
It is especially significant that the user's energy expenditure may be expressed as calories burned, inasmuch as this is a parameter of primary concern to many exercisers. One advantage of the present system is that a variety of environments in the virtual world displayed on the monitor can prompt any desired type and intensity of physical activity, achieving activity and energy expenditure goals in an ever-changing and challenging environment, so that the user looks forward to, rather than dreads, exercise, testing, or therapy sessions.
Measurement of motion (movement in three planes) is used to quantify work and energy expenditure. Movement-related quantities (movement parameters) such as force, acceleration, work and power, defined below, are dependent on the rate of change of more elementary quantities such as body position and velocity (the latter of which is also a movement parameter). The energy expenditure of an individual is related to the movement of the individual while performing the invention protocols.
The concept that a complex motion can be considered as a combination of simple bilateral movements in any of three directions is convenient since this approach allows focus on elementary movements with subsequent adding of the effects of these simple components. Such concept relates to the ability to monitor continuously the movement of the individual to measure the resultant energy expenditure.
The ability of this embodiment to accurately measure a subject's movement rests on being able to determine his or her position and velocity at arbitrary points of time. For a given point in time, a position is measured directly. The sampling rate of the position of the individual or player 36 is sufficiently fast to allow accurate measurements to be made at very closely spaced intervals of time. By knowing an individual's position at arbitrary points along its path the velocity can be calculated.
In the present embodiment, positions can be used to determine velocity along a movement path: given the position of the individual at various instances of time, the embodiment can obtain the velocity in several ways. One method is to choose a point and calculate its velocity as being the result of dividing the distance between it and the next point by the time difference associated with those points. This is known as a finite difference approximation to the true velocity. For small spacing between points, it is highly accurate.
If D is the distance between consecutive points and T equal the time period to travel the distance D, then the velocity V is given by the following rate of change formula
V=D/T,
where V has the units of meters per second, m/s.
In three dimensional space, D is computed by taking the change in each of the separate bilateral directions into account. If dX, dY, and dZ represents the positional changes between the successive bilateral directions, then the distance D is given by the following formula
D=sqrt(dX*dX+dY*dY+dZ*dZ),
where “sqrt” represents the square root operation. The velocity can be labeled positive for one direction along a path and negative for the opposite direction. This is, of course, true for each of the bilateral directions separately.
This finite difference approximation procedure can also be used to calculate the acceleration of the object along the path. This is accomplished by taking the change in velocity between two consecutive points and dividing by the time interval between points. This gives an approximation to the acceleration A of the object which is expressed as a rate of change with respect to time as follows
A=dV/T,
where dV is the change in velocity and T is the time interval. Acceleration is expressed in terms of meters per second per second. The accuracy of this approximation to the acceleration is dependent on using sufficiently small intervals between points.
As an alternate to using smaller position increments to improve accuracy, more accurate finite difference procedures may be employed. This embodiment obtains positional data with accuracy within a few centimeters over time intervals of approximately 0.020 seconds, so that errors are assumed to be negligible.
In contrast to the finite difference approach, the positional data could be fitted by spline curves and treated as continuous curves. The velocity at any point would be related to the tangent to the individual's path using derivative procedures of standard calculus. This would give a continuous curve for the velocity from which a corresponding curve could be obtained for the acceleration of the individual.
It will be appreciated that other methods of modeling may be used to provide accurate estimations of velocity and acceleration.
In any case, the determination of the individual's acceleration provides a knowledge of the force F it experiences. The force is related to the mass M of the individual, given in kilograms, and acceleration, by the formula
F=M*A.
This is a resultant formula combining all three components of force and acceleration, one component for each of the three bilateral directions. The international standard of force is a newton which is equivalent to a kilogram mass undergoing an acceleration of one meter per second per second. This embodiment requires that the individual enter body weight prior to playing. (Body weight is related to mass by the acceleration of gravity.)
The effect of each component can be considered separately in analyzing an individual's movement. This is easily illustrated by recognizing that an individual moving horizontally will be accelerated downward due to gravity even as he or she is being decelerated horizontally by air drag. The effects of forces can be treated separately or as an aggregate. This allows one the option to isolate effects or lump effects together. This option provides flexibility in analysis.
Energy and work may be measured in the present invention. The energy expended by an individual in the inventive system can be derived from work. The mechanical work is calculated by multiplying the force acting on an individual by the distances that the individual moves while under the action of force. The expression for work (W) is given by
W=F*d.
The unit of work is a joule, which is equivalent to a newton-meter.
Power P is the rate of work production and is given by the following formula
P=W/T
The standard unit for power is the watt and it represents one joule of work produced per second.
Different individuals performing the same activity expend different amounts of heat due to differences in body mass, gender, and other factors. As indicated above, mechanical work done in an activity is determined in the present invention system by monitoring motion parameters associated with that activity. Total energy expenditure can be derived from known work-to-calories ratios.
A protocol called “Dynamic Posture” represents the athletic stance maintained during sport specific activity that maximizes a player's readiness for a specific task. Examples are the slight crouches or “ready” position of a soccer goalie or a football linebacker.
Testing or training of dynamic posture is achieved by having the user initially assume the desired position and then tracking, in essentially real-time, displacements in the Y (vertical) plane during interactive protocols. Such Y plane displacements accurately reflect vertical fluctuations of that point on the body on which the reflective marker is placed, for example, the hipline, which is often referred to as the Center of Gravity (CG) point.
It may be desirable to determine dynamic posture and train an athlete in obtaining optimal dynamic posture. The optimal dynamic posture during sport-specific activities is determined as follows:
A retro-reflective marker is mounted at the athlete's CG point.
The invention's computer 22 measures in real-time vertical displacements of the athlete's CG (Y-plane excursions) as he responds to interactive, sport-specific protocols.
The invention's computer 22 calculates in essentially real-time the athlete's movement velocities and/or accelerations during performance of sport-specific protocols.
The invention calculates the athlete's most efficient dynamic posture defined as that CG elevation that produces maximum velocities and/or accelerations/decelerations for the athlete in the sports-specific protocols.
The invention provides numerical and graphical feedback of results.
Once the optimal dynamic posture is determined, training optimal dynamic posture is achieved by the following steps:
A retro-reflective marker is mounted at the athlete's CG point.
The athlete 36 assumes the dynamic posture that he or she wishes to train.
The invention is initialized for this CG position.
The invention provides varying interactive movement challenges over sport-specific distances and directions, including unplanned movements,
Y-plane excursions from the optimal dynamic posture that exceed the pre-set threshold or window will generate real-time feedback of such violations for the user.
The invention provides real-time feedback of compliance with the desired dynamic posture during performance of the protocols.
The invention uses unplanned, interactive game-like movement challenges requiring sport-specific responses. The participant will move most effectively during stopping, starting and cutting activities if he assumes and maintains his optimum Center of Gravity (CG) elevation. Additional movement efficiencies are achieved by the player by minimizing CG elevation excursions. The invention is capable of tracking in essentially real-time, the participant's CG elevation by monitoring Y plane displacements. During the training phase, the participant will be provided with real-time feedback of any Y plane excursions exceeding targeted ranges.
The relationship between heart rate and physical activity of the subject during performance of the protocols is also quantified by the present invention. Heart rate is measured by a commercially available wireless (telemetry) device 36A (
Prior art applications have attempted to measure these two parameters simultaneously in an attempt to validate one of the measurement constructs as a measure of physical activity. In all such cases though, such measurements were not in real-time; they were recorded over time and did not employ position tracking means nor involve interactive protocols used in the inventive system.
In another aspect of the invention, simultaneous assessment and modulation of physical activity and heart rate is achieved as follows:
The subject 36 places a retro-reflective marker at his CG point.
A wireless heart-rate monitor 36A (
Subject 36 enters desired target heart-rate range. (This step is optional.)
The invention provides interactive, functional planned and unplanned movement challenges (protocols) over varying distances and directions.
The invention provides real-time feedback of compliance with selected heart-rate zone during performance of these protocols.
The invention provides a graphical summary of the relationship or correlation between heart-rate at each moment of time and free-body physical activity.
The present invention includes assessment and quantification of movement skills such as accelerations and decelerations during unplanned movement protocols over sport-specific distances. Quantification of bi-lateral vector accelerations and decelerations (how well a subject 36 moves left and right) are achieved as follows:
A retro-reflective marker is mounted at the athlete's CG point,
The invention tracks at sufficient sampling rate the athlete's movement in three degrees of freedom during his performance of sport-specific protocols, including unplanned movements over various vector distances,
The invention calculates in essentially real-time the athlete's movement accelerations and decelerations,
The invention categorizes each movement leg to a particular vector,
The invention provides numerical and graphical feedback of bi-lateral performance.
Quantification of the intensity of free-ranging physical activity as expressed in kilocalories per minute, and the total energy expended, is derived from movement data collected as the subject moves in response to prompts from the monitor, personal data such as weight inputted by the subject, and conventional conversion formulae.
During performance of the above protocols, the inventive system can measure the intensity, i.e., strenuousness or energy cost of physical activity during free ranging (functional) activities, expressed in calories per minute, distance traveled per unit of time.
Energy expenditure can be derived from the subject's movement data during performance of free-ranging activities. Well known laboratory instrumentation can be employed to ascertain the coefficient or conversion factor needed to convert work or power or distance derived from the movement data to calories expended. Oxygen uptake, expressed in milliliters per kilogram per minute can determine the caloric expenditure of physical activity and is considered the “gold standard” or reference when evaluating alternative measures of physical activity. The most precise laboratory means to determine oxygen uptake is through direct gas analysis, which would be performed on representative subject populations during their execution of the invention's protocols with a metabolic cart, which directly measures the amount of oxygen consumed. Such populations would be categorized based on age, gender and weight.
The software flow chart for the tasks of an illustrative embodiment is shown in
To start the task routine, the player is prompted to a starting position for the task and upon reaching this position, the protagonist(s) and the obstacle(s) for the task are generated on the display. The protagonist moves on the display, 90, in a trajectory dependent on the setup definition. For an interception routine, the player moves in a path which the player determines will result in the earliest interception point with the protagonist in accordance with the player's ability. During player movement, the player icon is generated, and continually updated, in scaled translation in the virtual space to the player's instantaneous position in the defined physical space. Movement continues until player contact, 92, and interception, 94, or until the protagonist contacts a boundary of the virtual space corresponding to the boundary of the defined physical space, 96. In the former case, if interception has occurred, a new protagonist appears on a new trajectory, 97. The player icon's position is recorded, 98, the velocity vectors calculated and recorded, and a score of assessment noted on the display. The system then determines if the task objectives have been met, 100, and for a single task, the final score is computed and displayed, 102, and calories burned in calculated, as well as information related to time and distance traveled in completing the task, and the session ends, 104.
In the event the player does not intercept the protagonist icon prior to the latter contacting a virtual space boundary corresponding to the boundary on the defined physical space, the direction of the protagonist is changed dependent on the setup definition, and the pursuit of the protagonist by the player continues as set forth above.
Concurrently with the player pursuit, in the event that obstacles have been selected in the setup definition, the same are displayed, 110, and the player must undertake a movement path to avoid these obstacles. For a single segment task, if the player contacts the obstacle, 112, the obstacle is highlighted, 114, and the routine is completed and scored as described above. In the event a moving obstacle was selected in the setup definition, if the obstacle strikes a boundary, 116, the obstacle's direction is changed, 118, and the task continues.
For a multiple segment task, if the obstacle is contacted, the protagonist's direction changes and the movements continue. Similarly, upon interception for a multiple segment task, a new protagonist trajectory is initiated and the obstacles also may be reoriented. The routine then continues until the objectives of the task have been met, and the session completed.
The tasks are structured to require the player to move forward, backward, left and right, and optionally vertically. The player's movement is quantified as to distance and direction dependent on the sampling rate and the update rate of the system. For each sampling period, the change in position is calculated. At the end of the session, these samples are totaled and displayed for the various movement vectors.
For an avoidance task wherein the objective of the session is to avoid a protagonist seeking to intercept the player, the aforementioned is appropriately altered. Thus if the player is intercepted by the protagonist, the session ends for a single segment task and the time and distance related information is calculated and displayed. For multiple segment tasks, the protagonist trajectory has a new origin and the session continues for the defined task until completed or terminated.
Performance Measurement Constructs
The present invention provides a unique and sophisticated computer sports simulator faithfully replicating the ever-changing interaction between offensive and defensive opponents. This fidelity with actual competition enables a global and valid assessment of an offensive or defensive player's functional, sport-specific performance capabilities. Such assessment may include use of indicia that are or are derived from movement parameter(s). Among these indicia derived from movement parameter(s) are several novel and interrelated measurement constructs which have been derived and rendered operable by specialized position-sensing hardware and interactive software protocols.
Feedback may be provided to the player regarding the measurement constructs. This feedback may take many forms. The feedback may be provided during the interactive session, with there being some effect in the virtual space (and the view) that is a function of one or more of the constructs, for example. Alternatively or in addition, feedback may be provided after the end of one or more interactive sessions.
One of the measurement constructs of the present invention is Compliance, a global measure of the player's core defensive skills is the ability of the player to maintain a synchronous relationship with the dynamic cues that are often expressed as an offensive virtual opponent. The ability to faithfully maintain a synchronous relationship with the virtual opponent is expressed either as compliance (variance or deviation from a perfect synchronous relationship with the virtual opponent) and/or as absolute performance measures of the player's velocity, acceleration and power. An integral component of such a synchronous relationship is the player's ability to effectively change position, i.e., to cut, etc. as discussed below. Referring to
A beacon, a component of the tracking system, is worn at the Player's waist.
At Position A software scaling parameters make the virtual opponent 210, coordinates in the virtual environment equivalent to the player's 212 coordinates in the physical environment.
The system's video displays the virtual opponent's movement along Path1(x,y,z,t) 214 as a function of dimensions X, Y and Z, and time (x,y,z,t) to a virtual Position B 216.
In response, the Player moves along Path 2(x,y,z,t) 218 to a near equivalent physical Position C 220. The Player's objective is to move efficiently along the same path in the physical environment from start to finish, as does the avatar in the virtual environment. However, since the virtual opponent typically moves along random paths and the Player is generally not as mobile as the virtual opponent, the player's movement path usually has some position error measured at every sample interval.
The system calculates at each sampling interval the Player's new position, velocity, acceleration, and power, and determines the Player's level of compliance characterized as measured deviations from the original virtual opponent 210-Player 212 spacing at position A.
The system provides real time numerical and graphical feedback of the calculations of part e.
Another measurement construct of the present invention is Opportunity—a quantification of the player's ability to create an asynchronous movement event when in an offensive role. The player's ability to execute abrupt changes (to cut) in his or her movement vector direction, expressed in the aforementioned absolute measures of performance, is one of the parameters indicative of the player's ability to create this asynchronous movement event. Referring to
A beacon, a component of the optical tracking system, is worn at the Player's waist.
At Position A, software scaling parameters make the virtual opponent 222, coordinates in the virtual environment equivalent to the player's 224 coordinates in the physical environment.
The Player moves along Path2(x,y,z,t) 226 to a physical Position C 228 The Player's objective is to maximize his/her movement skills in order to elude the virtual opponent 222.
In response, the system's video displays the virtual opponent's movement along Path1(x,y,z,t) 230 to an equivalent virtual Position B 232. The virtual opponent's movement characteristics are programmable and modulated over time in response to the Player's performance.
The system calculates at each sampling interval the Player's new position velocity, acceleration, and power, and determines the moment the Player has created sufficient opportunity to abruptly redirect his/her movement along Path3(x,y,z,t) 234 to intersect the virtual opponent's x-y plane to elude and avoid collision with the virtual opponent.
The system provides real time numerical and graphical feedback of the calculations of part e.
A number of performance components are essential to successfully executing the two aforementioned global roles. Accordingly the system assesses the following performance constructs or components: Dynamic Reaction Time, Dynamic Phase Lag, First Step Quickness, and Dynamic Reactive Bounding, Dynamic Sports Posture, Functional Cardio-respiratory Status, Dynamic Reactive Cutting. These constructs are explained in detail below.
Dynamic Reaction Time is a novel measure of the player's ability to react correctly and quickly in response to cuing that prompts a sport specific response from the player. It is the elapsed time from the moment the virtual opponent attempts to improve its position (from the presentation of the first indicating stimuli) to the player's initial correct movement to restore a synchronous relationship (player's initial movement along the correct vector path).
Dynamic Reaction Time is a measurement of ability to respond to continually changing, unpredictable stimuli, i.e., the constant faking, staccato movements and strategizing that characterizes game play. The present invention uniquely measures this capability in contrast to systems providing only static cues which do not provide for continual movement tracking.
Dynamic Reaction Time is comprised of four distinct phases: the perception of a visual and/or audio cue, the interpretation of the visual and/or audio cue, appropriate neuromuscular activation, and musculoskeletal force production resulting in physical movement. It is important to note that Dynamic Reaction Time, which is specifically measured in this protocol, is a separate and distinct factor from rate and efficiency of actual movement which are dependent on muscular power, joint integrity, movement strategy and agility factors. Function related to these physiological components is tested in other protocols including Phase Lag and First Step Quickness.
Faced with the offensive player's attempt to create an asynchronous event, the defensive player must typically respond within fractions of a second to relevant dynamic cues if the defensive player is to establish or maintain the desired synchronous relationship. With such minimum response time, and low tolerance for error, the defensive player's initial response must typically be the correct one. The player must continually react to and repeatedly alter direction and/or velocity during a period of continuous movement. Any significant response lag or variance in relative velocity and/or movement direction between the player and virtual opponent places the player irrecoverably out of position.
Relevant testing must provide for the many different paths of movement by the defensive player that can satisfy a cue or stimulus. The stimulus may prompt movement side to side (the X translation), fore and aft (the Z translation) or up or down (the Y translation). In many instances, the appropriate response may simply involve a twist or torque of the player's body, which is a measure of the orientation, i.e., a yaw, pitch or roll.
Referring to
A beacon, a component of the optical tracking system, is worn at the Player's waist.
At Position A, software scaling parameters make the virtual opponent 236, coordinates in the virtual environment equivalent to the player's 238 coordinates in the physical environment.
The system's video displays the virtual opponent's movement along Path1(x,y,z,t) 240 to a virtual Position B 242.
In response, the Player moves along Path2(x,y,z,t) 244 to a near equivalent physical Position C 246. The Player's objective is to move efficiently along the same path in the physical environment from start to finish as does the virtual opponent in the virtual environment. However, since the virtual opponent typically moves along random paths and the Player is generally not as mobile as the virtual opponent, the player's movement path usually has some position error measured at every sample interval.
Once the virtual opponent reaches Position B 242, it immediately changes direction and follows Path3(x,y,z,t) 248 to a virtual Position D 250. The Dynamic Reaction Timer is started after the virtual opponent's x, y, or z velocity component of movement reaches zero at Position B 242 and its movement along Path3(x,y,z,t) 248 is initiated.
The Player perceives and responds to the virtual opponent's new movement path by moving along Path4(x,y,z,t) 252 with intentions to comply to virtual opponent's new movement path. The Dynamic Reaction Timer is stopped at the instant the Player's x, y, or z velocity component of movement reaches zero at Position C 246 and his/her movement is redirected along the correct Path4(x,y,z,t) 252.
The system calculates at each sampling interval the Player's new position velocity, acceleration, and power.
The system provides real time numerical and graphical feedback of the calculations of part g and the Dynamic Reaction Time.
Dynamic Phase Lag is defined as the elapsed time that the player is “out of phase” with the cuing that evokes a sport specific response from the player. It is the elapsed time from the end of Dynamic Reaction Time to actual restoration of a synchronous relationship by the player with the virtual opponent. In sports vernacular, it is the time required by the player to “recover” after being “out-of-position” while attempting to guard his opponent.
Referring to
A beacon, a component of the optical tracking system, is worn at the Player's waist.
At Position A, software scaling parameters make the virtual opponent 254, coordinates in the virtual environment equivalent to the player's 256 coordinates in the physical environment.
The system's video displays the virtual opponent's movement along Path1(x,y,z,t) 258 to a virtual Position B 260.
In response, the Player moves along Path2(x,y,z,t) 262 to a near equivalent physical Position C 264. The Player's objective is to move efficiently along the same path in the physical environment from start to finish as does the Avatar in the virtual environment. However, since the virtual opponent typically moves along random paths and the Player is generally not as mobile as the virtual opponent 254, the player's movement path usually has some position error measured at every sample interval.
Once the virtual opponent reaches Position B 260, it immediately changes direction and follows Path3(x,y,z,t) 266 to a virtual Position D 268.
The Player perceives and responds to the virtual opponent's new movement path by moving along Path4(x,y,z,t) 270. The Phase Lag Timer is started at the instant the Player's x, y, or z velocity component of movement reaches zero at Position C 264 and his/her movement is directed along the correct Path4(x,y,z,t) 270 to position E 272.
When the Player's Position E finally coincides or passes within an acceptable percentage of error measured with respect to the virtual opponent's at Position D 268 the Phase Lag Timer is stopped.
The system calculates at each sampling interval the Player's new position velocity, acceleration, and power.
The system provides real time numerical and graphical feedback of the calculations of part h and the Phase Lag Time.
First Step Quickness may be measured as the player attempts to establish or restore a synchronous relationship with the offensive virtual opponent. First step quickness is equally important for creating an asynchronous movement event for an offensive player.
Acceleration is defined as the rate of increase of velocity over time and is a vector quantity In sports vernacular, an athlete with first step quickness has the ability to accelerate rapidly from rest, an athlete with speed has the ability to reach a high velocity over longer distances. One of the most valued attributes of a successful athlete in most sports is first step quickness.
This novel measurement construct purports that acceleration is a more sensitive measure of “quickness” over short, sport-specific movement distances than is average velocity or speed. This is especially true since a realistic simulation of sports challenges, which are highly variable in distance, would not be dependent upon fixed start and end positions. A second reason that the measurement of acceleration over sport-specific distances appears to be a more sensitive and reliable measure is that peak accelerations are reached over shorter distances, as little as one or two steps.
First step quickness can be applied to both static and dynamic situations. Static applications include quickness related to base stealing. Truly sports relevant quickness means that the athlete is able to rapidly change his movement pattern and accelerate in a new direction towards his goal. This type of quickness is embodied by Michael Jordan's skill in driving to the basket. After making a series of misleading movement cues, Jordan is able to make a rapid, powerful drive to the basket. The success of this drive lies in his first step quickness. Valid measures of this sports skill must incorporate the detection and quantifying of changes in movement based upon preceding movement. Because the vector distances are so abbreviated and the player is typically already under movement prior to “exploding”, acceleration, power and/or peak velocity are assumed to be the most valid measures of such performance. Measures of speed or velocity over such distances may not be reliable, and at best, are far less sensitive indicators.
Numerous tools are available to measure the athlete's average velocity between two points, the most commonly employed tool being a stopwatch. By knowing the time required to travel the distance between a fixed start and end position, i.e., a known distance and direction, the athlete's average velocity can be accurately calculated. But just as an automobile's zero to sixty-mph time, a measure of acceleration, is more meaningful to many car aficionados than its top speed, an average velocity measure does not satisfy interest in quantifying the athlete's first step quickness. Any sport valid test of 1st step quickness must replicate the challenges the athlete will actually face in competition.
In situations where the athlete's movement is over short, sport-specific distances that are not fixed start and stop positions, the attempt to compare velocities in various vectors of unequal distance is subject to considerable error. For example, comparison of bilateral vector velocities achieved over different distances will be inherently unreliable in that the athlete, given a greater distance, will achieve higher velocities. Conventional testing means, i.e., without continual tracking of the player, can not determine peak velocities, only average velocities.
Only by continuous, high-speed tracking of the athlete's positional changes in three planes of movement can peak velocity, acceleration, and/or power be accurately measured. For accurate assessment of bilateral performance, the measurement of power, proportional to the product of velocity and acceleration, provides a practical means for normalizing performance data to compensate for unequal distances over varying directions since peak accelerations are achieved within a few steps, well within a sport-specific playing area First Step Quickness may be determined as follows.
Referring to
Dynamic Reactive Bounding is the player's ability to jump or bound in response to cuing that evokes a sport specific response in the player. In certain protocols of the present invention, measured constructs include the player's dynamic reaction time in response to the virtual opponent's jumps as well as the player's actual jump height and/or bound distance and trajectory. Static measures of jumping (maximal vertical jump) have poor correlation to athletic performance. Dynamic measurements made within the present invention's simulation provide sports relevant information by incorporating the variable of time with respect to the jump or bound.
A jump is a vertical elevation of the body's center of gravity, specifically a displacement of the CM (Center of Mass) in the Y plane. A jump involves little, if any, horizontal displacement. In contrast, a bound is an elevation of the body's center of gravity having both horizontal and vertical components. The resulting vector will produce horizontal displacements in some vector direction.
Both the high jump and the long jump represent a bound in the sport of track and field. Satisfactory measures currently exist to accurately characterize an athlete's performance in these track and field events. But in these individual field events, the athlete is not governed by the unpredictable nature of game play.
Many competitive team sports require that the athlete elevate his or her center of gravity (Y plane), whether playing defense or offense, during actual game play. Examples include rebounding in basketball, a diving catch in football, a volleyball spike, etc. Unlike field events, the athlete must time her or his response to external cues or stimuli, and most frequently, during periods of pre-movement. In most game play, the athlete does not know exactly when or where he or she must jump or bound to successfully complete the task at hand.
It is universally recognized that jumping and bounding ability is essential to success in many sports, and that it is also a valid indicator of overall body power. Most sports training programs attempt to quantify jumping skills to both appraise and enhance athletic skills. A number of commercially available devices are capable of measuring an athlete's peak jump height. The distance achieved by a bound can be determined if the start and end points are known. But no device purports to measure or capture the peak height (amplitude) of a bounding exercise performed in sport relevant simulation. The peak amplitude can be a sensitive and valuable measure of bounding performance. As is the case with a football punt, where the height of the ball, i.e., the time in the air, is at least as important as the distance, the height of the bound is often as important as the distance.
The timing of a jump or bound is as critical to a successful spike in volleyball or rebound in basketball as its height. The jump or bound should be made and measured in response to an unpredictable dynamic cue to accurately simulate competitive play. The required movement vector may be known (volleyball spike) or unknown (soccer goalie, basketball rebound).
This novel measurement construct tracks in real time the actual trajectory of a jump or bound performed during simulations of offensive and defensive play. To measure the critical components of a jump or bound requires continuous sampling at high rates to track the athlete's movement for the purpose of detecting the peak amplitude as well as the distance achieved during a jumping or bounding event. Real time measurements of jumping skills include jump height, defined as the absolute vertical displacement of CM during execution of a vertical jump, and for a bound, the peak amplitude, distance and direction.
Referring to
Dynamic Sports Posture is a measure of the player's sports posture during performance of sport specific activities. Coaches, players, and trainers universally acknowledge the criticality of a player's body posture during sports activities. Whether in a defensive or offensive role, the player's body posture during sports specific movement directly impacts sport specific performance.
An effective body posture optimizes such performance capabilities as agility, stability and balance, as well as minimizes energy expenditure. An optimum posture during movement enhances control of the body center of gravity during periods of maximal acceleration, deceleration and directional changes. For example, a body posture during movement in which the center of gravity is “too high” may reduce stability as well as dampen explosive movements; conversely, a body posture during movement that is “too low” may reduce mobility. Without means of quantifying the effectiveness of a body posture on performance related parameters, discovering the optimum stance or body posture is a “hit or miss” process without objective, real time feedback.
Optimal posture during movement can be determined by continuous, high speed tracking of the player's CM in relationship to the ground during execution of representative sport-specific activities. For each player, at some vertical (Y plane) CM position, functional performance capabilities will be optimized. To determine that vertical CM position that generates the greatest sport-specific performance for each player requires means for continual tracking of small positional changes in the player's CM at high enough sampling rates to capture relevant CM displacements. It also requires a sports simulation that prompts the player to move as she or he would in actual competition, with abrupt changes of direction and maximal accelerations and decelerations over varying distance and directions.
Training optimum posture during movement requires that the player strive to maintain their CM within a prescribed range during execution of movements identical to those experienced in actual game play. During such training, the player is provided with immediate, objective feedback based on compliance with the targeted vertical CM. Recommended ranges for each player can be based either on previously established normative data, or could be determined by actual testing to determine that CM position producing the higher performance values.
Referring to
Once the optimal Dynamic Posture is determined, training optimal Dynamic Posture may be achieved by the following steps:
Functional Cardio-respiratory Status (Fitness) is the player's cardio-respiratory status during the aforementioned sports specific activities. In most sports competitions, there are cycles of high physiologic demand, alternating with periods of lesser demand. Cardiac demand is also impacted upon by situational performance stress and attention demands. Performance of the cardiorespiratory system under sports relevant conditions is important to efficient movement.
Currently, for the purpose of evaluating the athlete's cardio-respiratory fitness for sports competition, stationary exercise bikes, treadmills and climbers are employed for assessing cardiac response to increasing levels of physical stress. Though such exercise devices can provide measures of physical work, they are incapable of replicating the actual stresses and conditions experienced by the competitive athlete in most sports. Accordingly, these tests are severely limited if attempts are made to correlate the resultant measures to actual sport-specific activities. It is well known that heart rate is influenced by variables such as emotional stress and the type of muscular contractions, which can differ radically in various sports activities. For example, heightened emotional stress, and a corresponding increase in cardiac output, is often associated with defensive play as the defensive player is constantly in a “coiled” position anticipating the offensive player's next response.
For the cardiac rehab specialist, coach, or athlete interested in accurate, objective physiological measures of sport-specific cardiovascular fitness, no valid tests have been identified. A valid test would deliver sport-specific exercise challenges to cycle the athlete's heart rate to replicate levels observed in actual competition. The athlete's movement decision-making and execution skills, reaction time, acceleration-deceleration capabilities, agility and other key functional performance variables would be challenged. Cardiac response, expressed as heart rate, would be continuously tracked as would key performance variables. Feedback of heart rate vs. sport-specific performance at each moment in time will be computed and reported.
It will be appreciated that feedback regarding heart rate may be provided independent of feedback regarding sports-specific performance.
Functional Cardio-respiratory Fitness is a novel measurement construct capable of quantifying any net changes in sport-specific performance relative to the function of the cardio-respiratory system. Functional Cardio-respiratory Status may be determined as follows:
Dynamic Reactive Cutting is a measure of the player's ability to execute an abrupt change in position, i.e., a “cut” can be a directional change of a few degrees to greater than 90 degrees. Vector changes can entail complete reversals of direction, similar to the abrupt forward and backward movement transitions that may occur in soccer, hockey, basketball, and football. The athlete running at maximum velocity must reduce her or his momentum before attempting an aggressive directional change, this preparatory deceleration often occurs over several gait cycles. Once the directional change is accomplished, the athlete will maximally accelerate along his or her new vector direction.
Accurate measurement of cutting requires continuous tracking of position changes in three planes of movement; ascertaining the angle scribed by the cutting action; and measuring both the deceleration during braking prior to direction change and the acceleration after completing the directional change.
For valid testing, the cues (stimuli) prompting the cutting action must be unpredictable and interactive so that the cut can not be pre-planned by the athlete, except under specific training conditions, i.e., practicing pass routes in football. It must be sport specific, replicating the types of stimuli the athlete will actually experience in competition. The validity of agility tests employing ground positioned cones and a stopwatch, absent sport-relevant cuing, is suspect. With knowledge of acceleration and the player's body weight, the power produced by the player during directional changes can also be quantified.
Referring to
It should be noted that these motor-related components of sports performance and fitness (which may be or may be derived from movement parameter(s)) are equally important to safety, success and/or productivity in demanding work environments, leisure sports, and many activities of daily living.
The performance-related components are often characterized as either the sport-specific, functional, skill or motor-related components of physical fitness. These performance-related components are obviously important for safety and success in both competitive athletics and vigorous leisure sports activities. It should be equally obvious that they are also essential for safety and productive efficiency in demanding physical work activities and unavoidably hazardous work environments such as police, fire and military—as well as for maintaining independence for an aging population through enhanced mobility and movement skills.
First Person Perspective
Another embodiment of the invention involves a personal perspective, also known as a first person perspective. This perspective is a view on the display of the virtual space from the perspective of the player. It is in contrast to the type of information shown on the display 28 in
In a third person perspective the movement of the icons in virtual space is represented by the movement of icons within the generally fixed view. Thus movement of a player icon to a different location in virtual space results in movement of a corresponding player icon within the view from the generally fixed viewpoint.
However, a first person view is a view from a perspective within the simulation. A system 360 including first person viewing is shown in
A stationary object 372 in the virtual space will change its position on the display to reflect its position relative to the new viewpoint. A movable object in virtual space such as a protagonist 376 also changes its position on the display 370 in response to a shift in viewpoint caused by movement of the player 362. In addition, the protagonist 376 also is able to change its position within the virtual space. A change in position by the protagonist will also result in a change of its position on the display 370.
The system 360 may also display a representation indicating part of the virtual being corresponding to the player 362, for example the hands 378 shown on the display 370 in
The display of a first person perspective increases the fidelity of the simulation, by making the view on the display closer to that which would be perceived by the player in a real life activity.
Multiple Player Encounters
It will be appreciated that it is possible to have simulations or games using the above systems where multiple players participate at once. Such multiple players may merely be displayed together, not interacting, or may alternatively interact by competing against one another or by cooperating in a task or tasks.
As shown in
It will be appreciated that a system where the players share the same physical space presents the potential of the players colliding, possibly leading to injury. Accordingly,
The physical spaces 406 and 408 may be located in the same room, in which case it may be possible to have one tracking system track the position of both of the players. However, it may be more effective to have separate tracking systems for each of the physical spaces. This is shown in the illustrated embodiment, with tracking systems 410 and 412 corresponding to respective physical spaces 406 and 408. It will be appreciated that separate tracking systems will generally be needed if the physical spaces 406 and 408 are in different locations, such as in different rooms or in different buildings.
The tracking systems 410 and 412 are operatively coupled to a computer 416 (which consist of two separate computer units in communication with one another and/or with a central computer unit). The computer 416 in turn is operatively coupled to displays 418 and 420 which correspond to the physical spaces 406 and 408, respectively. The operative coupling between the computer 416, and the tracking systems 410 and 412 and the displays 418 and 420 may be accomplished by means of hard-wired cables between these components. Alternatively, it will be appreciated that the operative coupling may employ other means such as modems and telephone lines, radio or infrared light signals, or connections to computer networks such as the World Wide Web. Thus such connections may be made over long distances, allowing players separated by a large physical distance to participate in a simulation in the same virtual space. It will be appreciated that more than one computer or processor may be used, especially with systems connected over large distances.
The displays 418 and 420 may show the same view of virtual space, such as a the same third person perspective. Alternatively and preferably, the displays 418 and 420 may show different views of the virtual space. For example, for a simulated tennis match each of the displays may show a third person perspective view from the end of the court corresponding to the respective physical spaces. Alternatively, different first person perspective views of the physical space may be shown on each of the displays. Thus each display may have a viewpoint in virtual space corresponding to the location of the player viewing that display.
It will be appreciated that more than two players may be involved in the same simulation, with additional physical spaces, displays, tracking systems, and/or computers added as appropriate. For example, each player may have an individual game unit (a display, tracking system, and physical space), while all the players share a computer or computers. It will be appreciated that even when more than one physical space is used, more than one player may occupy each physical space. For example, a simulated tennis doubles match may involve two physical spaces, with two players occupying each physical space.
It will be appreciated that the multiplayer simulation disclosed above allows the performance of more than one person to be evaluated simultaneously. In addition, the use of a live player as a virtual opponent results in a more realistic sports simulation. Despite advances in technology and artificial intelligence, computers are unable to capture the nuances of human thinking and behavior in general, and sports strategy in particular. Much of sports performance is governed by compressed time frames—mere milliseconds—within which offensive and defensive opponents are capable of a wide variety of movements associated with six degrees of freedom. Computers are as of yet unable to fully simulate this behavior.
Performance Scaling
If the player 442 makes a small jump, such as to position 442′, this could be represented in virtual space and displayed as a much larger jump to position 446′. A scale factor could be used to control the relationship between the actual jump height and the apparent jump height in virtual space. Such scaling may be linear or nonlinear.
Similarly, movement by the player 442 along a path 456 may be displayed through use of a scale factor as movement of a greater or lesser distance, such as movement along a virtual path 458.
The scale factors may be different for movement in different directions. In addition, the scale factors may be adjusted to take into account differences in skill levels and training levels of different players and different avatars or protagonists. Thus through use of scale factors a child may be enabled to compete evenly in a virtual basketball game against a protagonist having the ability of Michael Jordan, for example.
Scaling may also be used to provide positive feedback which encourages further efforts. For example, a person undergoing rehabilitation after an injury is likely to react positively to a large apparent result in virtual space to a physical effort that produces only a small movement. Such a person may thereby be encouraged to continue exercising and improving skills when he or she might otherwise become discouraged.
Scaling may be adjusted during an individual protocol, or during a series of protocols making up a training session. Such adjustments may be made in response to increased performance, for example due to acquisition of new skills, or decreased performance, for example due to fatigue or injury.
It will be appreciated that scaling may be integrated with the multiplayer systems described above so as to handicap one of the opponents relative to the other. This handicapping may be used to make competitive an encounter between two opponents of unequal skill, such as a parent and a child, or a fan and a trained athlete. Through scaling a wily, though physically less adept, person, such as a coach, may more directly interact for teaching purposes with a more physically able student.
It will be appreciated that there are many other permutations of the above-described handicapping and scaling concepts. For example, a multiplayer tennis match may be handicapped by providing one of the players with a higher net (which would be perceived only in that player's display). A scaled lag may be added to slow down the apparent quickness of one of the players. One player may have a maximum top speed for changes of position in the virtual space.
Progression Algorithm
Using the above-described systems, protocols may be created that are designed to lead a player or subject through a series of motions. For example, a protocol may be used to drill a subject on a skill, such as lateral motion or timed leaping ability. Groups of protocols may be created that involve skills specific to a certain sport, the groups being selectable for playback as such by a user. For example, drills involving basketball skills or drills involving baseball skills may be grouped, allowing an athlete with a particular interest or in training for a specific sport to easily locate and playback drills for developing appropriate skills.
The invention allows modulation, over a continual range, of playback of stored protocols. This modulation may be accomplished by the speed, amplitude, and/or direction of motion by an avatar or protagonist during playback of a protocol. Such modulation may be used to tailor an exercise program to the abilities of an individual user. For example, a rehabilitating geriatric may be sufficiently challenged by playback of a given protocol at 20% of the speed it was recorded at. However, an elite healthy athlete may require playback of the same protocol at 140% of the speed it was recorded at. User-specific modulation levels may be recorded for analysis of results and for recall for future training sessions of that user. As a user progresses the modulation of protocols may be changed to continue to provide the user with new challenges.
Playback of protocols may also be modulated during an individual protocol or series of protocols in response to user performance. For example, comparison of current performance to past performance may indicate that the user is ready to begin training at a new, higher level of performance—modulation of playback of protocols may be revised accordingly to provide a new challenge within that training session. Alternatively, modulation may be revised in response to decreased performance, for example due to fatigue or injury.
Modulation of the playback of stored protocols allows a single protocol to be used by subjects having different skill levels. Thus results for various training sessions of one user, and the results of various users of different skill levels, may readily be compared.
Recordation of Protocols
Further in accordance with the invention, a system 460 which is able to record protocols for later playback, is shown in
The storage device records the movement contours of the trainer 462 for later playback. The position of the trainer 462 may also be represented on a display 472 by the location of an icon in a virtual space, thus providing feedback to the trainer regarding his or her movements. Such recordation is preferably at a rate of at least 20 Hz, is more preferably at a rate of at least 50 Hz, and is even more preferably at a rate of 70 Hz.
The protocol so recorded by the system 460 may be played back, with the motion of an avatar following the recorded motion contour of the trainer 462. The avatar following this recorded motion contour may be interacted with by a player or subject. For example, the player may be trained to emulate the trainer's movements by attempting to maintain synchronicity with the avatar's movements. A measure of compliance may be made between the player's motions and the prerecorded motions of the trainer.
Thus the system 480 may be used as follows:
The protocol creator 462 dons the beacon 463 and “choreographs” a desired movement pattern while his or her positional changes over time are recorded. This recording represents the creator's movement contour pattern.
A user attempts to follow (the synchronicity measurement construct), or somehow interacts with, the pre-recorded movement contour pattern at a selected playback rate.
The user is provided with real time feedback as to his or her compliance.
It will be appreciated that the recording feature of the system 480 may be used to record motions of a subject for later playback, for review and/or evaluation by the subject or by others.
Measurement of Orientation
As indicated above, beacons may be used to measure orientation of body of the player or subject. Measurement of orientation is useful in situations where an appropriate response to a stimulus may simply involve a twist or torque of the player's body. The ability to measure orientation is valuable in a number of respects.
Orientation may used to increase fidelity of simulation. Display of an icon representing the player or subject may be altered depending upon the orientation of the player. In multiplayer simulations, representation of orientation imparts useful information to an opponent, since many maneuvers such as fakes and feints often mostly or totally involve changes in orientation as opposed to changes in position.
For first person perspectives, taking orientation into account allows the view a player sees to be revised based on changes in orientation of a player.
Since orientation is a part of posture, measurement and display of orientation is useful in training correct sports posture. Taking orientation into account in the display would provide better feedback to the player regarding his or her orientation.
Measurement of player orientation may be used in determining certain measurement parameters, such as reaction time and first step quickness.
Measurement of orientation allows for calculation of rotational accelerations. Rapid, properly timed accelerations of the body center (the hips) are essential in many sports for speed and power development. As is known from the martial arts, rapid twisting of the hips is essential for both effective movement and power generation. First step quickness may be redefined as an acceleration of the player's hips (translational or rotational) in the correct direction.
Measurement of Upper Extremity Movements
Referring to
Tracking of movement of upper extremities provides enhanced simulation in activities where movement of the upper extremities is important, such as boxing, tennis, handball, and activities that involve catching or using the hands to move an object.
By use of the upper beacons 488 on one or both upper extremities, measurements may be extracted related to the player's ability to react, initiate and coordinate his or her upper extremities. The ability to quantify such performance is valuable for sports enhancement (football lineman, boxers, handball players, etc.) and physical medicine (rehabilitation of shoulder and elbow injuries, etc.).
Specific parameters that may be measured or calculated taking into account upper extremity movements include: Dynamic Reaction Time (how quickly the hands respond to cues); Vector Acceleration (magnitude of the acceleration of the hands/arms); Synchronicity (ability of hands to follow interactive cues); and Cardio-Vectors (heart rate relationship to work performed by the hands).
The training system 480 may be modified to additionally or alternatively track the lower body extremities, as by use of lower beacons on the legs, feet, hips, etc.
Movement Resistance
It is desirable to provide tactile and force feedback provide for enhancement of a virtual reality experience, allowing a subject or player to experience forces simulating those of the activities simulated in virtual reality. For example, if a weight is lifted in the physical world, the subject feels a resistance to the movement (due to its weight).
Referring to
The player 502 wears a belt 504 around his or her waist. One end of each of one or more resistance devices 506 are attached to the belt. The resistance devices 506 provide a force against which the player 502 must pull in order to move. As shown the resistance devices 506 are elastomeric or elastic bands which provide an opposing force as they are stretched. The other end of the resistance devices 506 are attached to posts or stakes 510, which are preferably outside of the physical space 512 on a floor (as shown), or on a wall or ceiling. As shown in
The resistance devices 506 thus provide resistance to movement of the player 502. As the player moves within the physical space 512, one or more of the resistance devices 506 is stretched. This stretching produces a force on the player 502 opposing his or her motion. This opposing resistance acts to progressively overload the subject or player in each movement plane, thereby accelerating progress due to well-known principles of athletic training.
Other suitable resistance devices include springs and gas-filled cylinders, as well as cords sold under the trademark SPORT CORDS.
Preferably, resistance devices would be provided for all three planes of movement (X, Y, Z). Resistance devices for providing resistance in the Y-direction (resistance to jumping or leaping) may be anchored to the floor in the vicinity of the player. Anchors for the resistance devices may be recessed in the floor.
It will be appreciated that resistance devices may be attached to the player at places other than the waist. For example, the resistance devices may be attached to lower and/or upper extremities to provide resistance to movement of specific parts of the body.
Additionally or alternatively, resistance devices with both ends attached to different parts of the body may be used. Such a device may be attached, for example, from arm to leg, from upper arm to lower arm, from upper leg to lower leg, from head to arm, from arm to waist, or from arm to other arm.
Use of resistance devices coupled with accurate measurement of location of the player or subject allows enhanced accuracy of sports results in more sports relevant movement patterns. The system 500 also allows quantification of the effects of added resistance both in real time and progressively over time.
The resistance devices may also be used to enhance the simulation by simulating the apparent conditions encountered by the virtual counterpart that the subject controls. For example, the resistance provided by the resistance devices may simulate the resistance the subject's counterpart experiences while treading through mud, snow, or waist deep water. With appropriate force feedback, the subject not only sees the forces acting on his or her counterpart, but actually “experiences” these forces in the physical world. Such resistance may be provided by one or more actuators such as piston-cylinder assemblies, motors, etc., connected to the player, the force exerted by the actuator(s) being controlled by the system to provide for a force feedback to the player or a force consistent with the virtual reality in which the player exists.
The resistance devices may also be used to provide handicapping in multiplayer games, with levels of resistance chosen to compensate for differences in skill between the players.
Tracking Movement in Conjunction with Use of Exercise Apparatuses
The slide board is a widely used exercise apparatus which is used for conditioning and rehabilitation to help improve lateral movement, power, proprioception and endurance. As shown in
Another stationary exercise device involving back-and-forth movement is the ski simulation device 540 shown in
The devices shown in
Measurement constructs such as the Dynamic Sports Posture construct described above may be used to analyze the movements of the subject 562.
A system such as the system 560 may be used to enhance the simulation of a sports experience by displaying appropriate surroundings while using the exercise device 564. For example moguls, tree branches, other skiers, etc. may be displayed during a skiing simulation. The speed of apparent movement in the displayed virtual space may be tied to the speed of movement of the subject.
Reactive Power Training
Typical exercise programs incorporate two primary components—isolated limb/joint resistive training (strength training) and aerobic cardiovascular (CV) training. Though generally popular, such programs are considered inferior for those seeking improved functional or sport specific performance accompanied by substantial increases in lean body mass (more muscle).
One reason that such programs are considered inferior is neither of the traditional components meaningfully contributes to such core functional capabilities as balance, reaction time, agility and reactive power. The traditional strength training component of isolated joint/limb training component is designed to increase the amount of load that can be lifted, not to appreciably enhance the individual's ability to efficiently and, where required, explosively negotiate his or her environment. Strength training does not train the nervous system to efficiently work in conjunction with the muscle fibers to produce optimum functional performance.
Additionally, for those seeking the lean, muscular, powerful physiques of the elite sprinter, gymnast or body builder, the traditional aerobic CV component may be counter-productive. In his book Explosive Power & Strength, Dr. Donald Chu noted that “aerobic training has become a dominant component of most conditioning programs . . . . However, except in the early stages of their careers, aerobic training for strength and power athletes is out of the question. Aerobic training may help an athlete recover from high-intensity exercise, but it does so at the expense of speed and power and increases the risk of overuse injuries and overtraining. Endurance training is important, but . . . be certain that the type of endurance developed is specific to the sport.”
Consequently, the most efficient and effective meaning of developing the lean powerful, functional bodies that many fitness club members covet, and that many athletes and seniors require, involves training for power. Power training, simply stated, is comprised of multiple, relatively brief bouts (periods) of high intensity exercise. For example, sprinters run at the fastest possible pace for a brief period of time—the result is significant muscle hypertrophy. By contrast, distance runners work at a sustainable pace, doing a nominal amount of work per unit of time. It is this specificity of training that produces the contrasting long, thin thigh muscles of the marathon runner and the highly defined, large muscles of the sprinter.
Referring to
The reactive training devices 602 provide cues to a subject (also referred to as a user or player) to perform movements in response. For example, the reactive training devices may involve the subject attempting to mimic the movements of an avatar on a display screen. The cues are provided for numerous movements over a short period of time.
Preferably, the cues include prompts for numerous both planned and unplanned movement challenges. Preferably cues will be to elicit movements that elevate the subject's heart rate to a desired target zone. The cues may include auditory and/or visual cues.
The cues will preferably elicit movements in at least two dimensions. Examples of such two-dimensional movements include movement within a rectangular floor area, movement along a line combined with jumping, and movement along a line (such as by sliding) while maintaining a desired posture. It will be appreciated that there are many such other movements in at least two dimensions which may be cued by the reactive training device.
The reactive movements prompted by the reactive training devices may include training scenarios designed to enhance sports specific skills. For example, soccer skills may be enhance by engaging the user in a simulated soccer game.
As shown in
The marker may emit or transmit a signal which enables the reactive training system to identify a particular subject. For example, the marker may emit sound waves (either sonic or ultrasonic) or light waves (either visible or non-visible) that the reactive training system is able to associate with the particular subject. Thus within a single training session a user may be able to interrupt a particular reactive training scenario after a bout of reactive training, with the reactive training device able to later “recognize” the user and continue the scenario from the point of interruption.
Alternatively or in addition, the recognition of a particular user may be used to call forth a reactive training scenario or sequence particular to that user.
It will be appreciated that the marker may emit or transmit other information, such as the heart rate of the wearer. However, a heart monitor worn by the subject may have a separate telemetry system.
It will be appreciated that a user may be identified to a reactive training device by other means, such as by entry of identification number on a keypad or touch screen, or by insertion into the device of an object bearing indicia, such as a bar code or a magnetic medium, which identifies the user.
The numerous testing and training system embodiments described above are suitable for use as reactive training devices. Many of the features of the testing and training systems, such as providing real-time feedback to the subject or user, are desirable as well in the reactive training device.
It will appreciated that alternatively other devices that provide cues that elicit responsive movements from subjects are suitable for use as reactive training devices in the reactive power training system.
The reactive training devices may provide real-time feedback to the subject during use of the reactive power training device. The feedback may related to one or more of the constructs described above. For example, the feedback may be indicative of the subject's reactive power, with the feedback possibly including an indication of the subject's acceleration, velocity, or power.
Although as illustrated all of the reactive training devices are the same, it will be appreciated that all of the reactive training devices need not be identical. In addition, a greater or lesser number of reactive training devices may be employed.
Examples of suitable strength training devices include the Total Gym, Cybex or LifeFitness selectorized strength machines, BowFlex, free weight bars and dumbbells, pulleys, elastomeric cables, chin bars and the like. Preferably the strength training devices are capable of training various of the user's muscles. For example, some of the strength training devices may be directed to working the upper body muscles, while others may be directed to working the lower body muscles.
Referring to
The network administration computer 620 includes a data entry device 626 for entering and/or updating information in the storage device 624. Suitable data entry devices include keyboards, mice, touch screens, disk drives, and CD-ROM drives.
The strength training devices 604 may also be coupled to the network 622. Information about the strength training exercises performed (such as the number of repetitions, the weight, the distance traveled, and/or the setting of the machine) may thereby be transmitted to the storage device 624.
Information may also be sent along the network 622 to a suitable display included as part of each of the strength training devices 604. Such a suitable display may be integrally incorporated with the rest of the strength training device. Alternatively the display may be in the vicinity of the strength training device, alongside the strength training device, for example. The information sent may include the information regarding the exercises to be performed, and/or may include other information.
While the reactive power training system is preferably networked as described above, it will be appreciated that reactive power training system may in whole or in part non-networked. For example, information regarding the exercises performed on the strength training devices may be recorded manually, with the information later entered into the networked storage device.
During the recommended two to three reactive power training sessions per week, a subject follows a training sequence which preferably alternates between 30 to 120 second bouts (periods) of exercise on reactive training devices 602, and resistive strength enhancing activities on the strength training devices 604. These highly stimulating, engaging training sessions can be completed in approximately 35 to 50 minutes. It is believed that resistive strength training prepares (fires up) the muscle fibers prior to reactive training to create a state where the neuromuscular system is most receptive to growth.
Thus use of the training system 600 transforms the strength and power developed through isolated joint/limb training into truly functional reactive power. It develops the type of CV fitness that leads to enhanced sports performance for sports demanding repetitive explosive movement. Further, it provides a time efficient, entertaining means of creating a well-defined, powerful physique.
The reactive training devices 602 direct the flow of tasks over each training session, and over a series of the user's training sessions. For example, after a suitably-timed bout of exercise on the reactive training device the user may be prompted to proceed to a specific strength training device. Such a prompt may be coupled with other information, for example information regarding the performance of the just-completed bout of exercise.
The network administration computer 620 may be programmed to direct users so that the strength training devices 604 are used efficiently. For example, the network administration computer may be programmed to send a user to a strength training machine which is currently unused, if the unused machine is part of that user's training sequence and has not yet been used by that user in the present training session.
There is a valuable synergistic effect derived from of power reactive training. It is widely known that significant benefits to the cardiovascular system are derived from exercise that elevates the subject's heart rate to the targeted zone for a period of approximately 20 to 40 minutes. Preferably the bouts of reactive training are sufficiently strenuous to maintain the user's heart rate in the target zone during the resistive strength training that occurs between bouts of reactive training. As one purpose of the present invention to develop reactive power, it is desirable for the CV training component (here use of the reactive training devices) to contribute to the subject's ability to function successfully during anaerobic power activities. Further, the CV component ideally create a training environment (situation) that replicates the type of muscular contractions and anxiety that the subject will actually encounter in competition or demanding work environment.
Exercise scientists and coaches have searched for a single variable that could accurately characterize both performance and fitness.
Currently, a subject's overall performance fitness must be characterized by a number of performance variables. These variables may include measures of lower and/or upper body strength, aerobic or anaerobic endurance, speed or the like. Few of these measures share a common denominator that would allow comparison between all training components.
With Reactive Power Training, there is one variable that is descriptive of the exercise components that comprise the program. This single variable, power, is the common denominator that enable accurate assessment of the benefits a subject derives from both isolated limb strength training, as well as the benefits derived from sport specific movement training.
Current measures of progress do not provide such a global measure. Measures of isolated joint strength, i.e., a bench press or squat for example, are not reflective of functional movement capabilities. Current core tests for athletes measure the amount of load that can be lifted or how fast they can run. As such, these tasks are specialized strength and speed measures and are not reflective of the subject's ability to move with power and skill amidst his or her environment. Most often, no indication of movement skills is provided—balance, speed, coordination, agility, perception, recognition, cognition, etc. are all left unmeasured.
The present invention can quantify isolated limb power, which contributes to the ability to move with skill and power, as well as reactive power, which is the ability to actually move with skill and power. The above-described reactive power training system is uniquely capable of measuring reactive power.
By monitoring the activities of the subject while performing tasks that are reflective of that individual's skill domain, dynamic (reactive) power can be quantified. For an athlete, this entails sport specific tasks, with the measurement location being the kinematic description of movements of the pelvis during execution within a computer simulation. Consequently, both isolated limb strength and power are quantified, as well as dynamic power. For the reasons given above, it is preferable that strength training and reactive training be co-mingled and alternated within the same training session. However, it will be appreciated that a serial approach to training may be used. In such an approach most of all of the strength training is done either before or after the reactive training.
Real Time Segmented Feedback
Movement challenges created for the player by movement of the virtual; opponent or avatar may include many relatively short, discrete movement segments or legs. These segments may prompt movement amounting to only a few inches of movement of the player's center of mass. These segments may be without fixed start or end positions. However, start or end positions may be approximated, for example, by positions where the player changes direction, or by movement of the player a given distance away from a position where he or she was at rest.
In achieving maximal performance gains, it is beneficial for the player to be given sensitive, real time, accurate feedback. It is preferable for real time feedback to be provided to the player very soon after his or her completion of each movement segment, regardless of the segment distance (generally detected as a core displacement of the player's center of mass).
The present invention includes calculation of performance values (based for example on the parameters described above) by continuously sampling positional changes in at least two planes of movement, and preferably in three planes of movement.
On Screen Display of Performance Parameters
In addition to a view 662 of virtual space, the monitor 660 also displays parameter indications 664 of one or more parameters.
The parameter indications 664 display information related to performance parameters such as those described above. For example, the parameter indications may be useful in providing the above-described real time segmented feedback.
The relation to measured performance parameters may be direct, for example displaying an indication of the player's elevation. Alternatively, the relationship between performance parameters and the displayed information may be more attenuated. The displayed information may be of a derived or calculated parameter such as power. It may alternatively be of some “game score” which is an indication of one or more aspects of the player's performance.
The display of information in the parameter indications 664 is preferably graphical, although the information may additionally or alternatively be displayed in other ways, such as numerically. As shown, the information in each of the parameter indications 664 is represented graphically by changing the color of part of a displayed inverted triangle 670.
The scaling of the parameter indications 664 may be changeable, accommodating for example the differences expected in performance of different players, and the different movements expected in different types of testing and training scenarios.
The parameter indications 664 each include a flag 672 which provides an indication of the maximum value of the displayed parameter. For example, the flag for an indication of player elevation may display the maximum elevation of the player thus far. This elevation information is an important parameter for posture training, training a player to maintained a crouched position, for example. The elevation information is also useful, for example, for informing the player of his or her highest jump.
It will be appreciated that the parameter indications need not include flags, and may include additional flags. It will be further be appreciated that the flags may be used for a wide variety of other purposes, for example showing minimum parameter values.
The parameter indications 664 are preferably updated in real time, in order to provide the player with timely feedback on performance.
The monitor 660 also displays a heart indication 678 which indicates the heart rate of the player. The heart indication may be graphical or numerical, and may include an auditory signal, such as the simulated sound of a beating heart. The heart rate of the player may be measured and transmitted for display using a heart monitor such as that described above.
Although the invention has been shown and described with respect to a certain preferred embodiment or embodiments, it is obvious that equivalent alterations and modifications will occur to others skilled in the art upon the reading and understanding of this specification and the annexed drawings. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described elements (components, assemblies, devices, compositions, etc.), the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such elements are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any element which performs the specified function of the described element (i.e., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the herein illustrated exemplary embodiment or embodiments of the invention. In addition, while a particular feature of the invention may have been described above with respect to only one or more of several illustrated embodiments, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other embodiments, as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/100,551, filed Apr. 10, 2008, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,791,808; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/414,990, filed May 1, 2006, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,359,121; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/099,252, filed Apr. 5, 2005, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,855; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/888,043, filed Jul. 9, 2004, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,876,496; which is a continuation U.S. application Ser. No. 10/197,135, filed Jul. 17, 2002, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,765,726; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/654,848, filed Sep. 5, 2000, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,430,997; which is a continuation of International Application PCT/US99/04727, filed Mar. 3, 1999, which was published under PCT Article 21(2) in English, abandoned; which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/121,935, filed Feb. 26, 1999; and which is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/173,274, filed Oct. 15, 1998, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,308,565; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/554,564, filed Nov. 6, 1995, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,098,458; and which is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/034,059, filed Mar. 3, 1998, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,073,489; which is a continuation-in-part of International Application PCT/US96/17580, filed Nov. 5, 1996, which was published under PCT Article 21(2) in English, abandoned; and which is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/554,564, filed Nov. 6, 1995, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,098,458. All of the above-mentioned applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1519473 | Zahm | Dec 1924 | A |
| 1534865 | Owens | Apr 1925 | A |
| 2316975 | Ruge | Apr 1943 | A |
| 3250270 | Bloom | May 1966 | A |
| 3395698 | Morehouse | Aug 1968 | A |
| 3424005 | Brown | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3511097 | Corwin | May 1970 | A |
| 3712294 | Muller | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3717857 | Evans | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3744480 | Gause et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3752144 | Weigle, Jr. | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3826145 | McFarland | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3845756 | Olsson | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3984666 | Barron | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4066069 | Dolch | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4122840 | Tsuchiya et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4138118 | Budney | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4192000 | Lipsey | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4212079 | Segar et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4244021 | Chiles, III | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4278095 | Lapeyre | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4322609 | Kato | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4345473 | Berni | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4367752 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4371945 | Karr et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4375674 | Thornton | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4380802 | Segar et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4398429 | Cook et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4488017 | Lee | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4493220 | Carignan et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4512567 | Phillips | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4522062 | Peters | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4542897 | Melton et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4566461 | Lubell et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4571682 | Silverman et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4574899 | Griffin | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4578769 | Frederick | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4627620 | Yang | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4630817 | Buckley | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4645458 | Williams | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4660828 | Weiss | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4691694 | Boyd et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4695953 | Blair et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4702475 | Elstein et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4711447 | Mansfield | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4738269 | Nashner | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4751642 | Silva et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4771637 | Kubler | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4787051 | Olson | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4790528 | Nakao et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4817938 | Nakao et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4817950 | Goo | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4828257 | Dyer et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4855942 | Bianco | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4891748 | Mann | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4925189 | Braeunig | May 1990 | A |
| 4927138 | Ferrari | May 1990 | A |
| 4988981 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5001632 | Hall-Tipping | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5027303 | Witte | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5033013 | Kato et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5038144 | Kaye | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5049079 | Furtado et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5052406 | Nashner | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5054771 | Mansfield | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5054774 | Belsito | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5067710 | Watterson et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5080105 | Thornton | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5089960 | Sweeney, Jr. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5104119 | Lynch | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108363 | Tuttle et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5115291 | Stokes | May 1992 | A |
| 5128671 | Thomas, Jr. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5139261 | Openiano | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5143505 | Burdea et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5148154 | MacKay et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5151071 | Jain et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5184295 | Mann | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5186695 | Mangseth et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5195746 | Boyd et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5207621 | Koch et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5209223 | McGorry et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5214615 | Bauer | May 1993 | A |
| 5229754 | Aoki et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5229756 | Kosugi et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5234392 | Clark | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5239463 | Blair et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5244441 | Dempster et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5255211 | Redmond | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5269318 | Nashner | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5269519 | Malone | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5288078 | Capper et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5295491 | Gevins | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5297558 | Acorn et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5303715 | Nashner et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5308296 | Eckstein | May 1994 | A |
| 5314390 | Westing et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5318487 | Golen et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5320538 | Baum | Jun 1994 | A |
| RE34728 | Hall-Tipping | Sep 1994 | E |
| 5347306 | Nitta | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5354162 | Burdea et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5362069 | Hall-Tipping | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5362298 | Brown et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5364271 | Aknin et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5369270 | Gurner et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5385519 | Hsu et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5394879 | Gorman | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5400661 | Cook et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5405152 | Katanics et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410472 | Anderson | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5414256 | Gurner et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5416535 | Sato et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5423554 | Davis | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5442168 | Gurner et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5453758 | Sato | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5464012 | Falcone | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5466200 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5469740 | French et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5474087 | Nashner | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5474090 | Begun et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5476103 | Nahsner | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5485402 | Smith et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489249 | Brewer et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5495576 | Ritchey | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5512025 | Dalebout et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5516105 | Eisenbrey et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5521373 | Lanier et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5524637 | Erickson | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527239 | Abbondanza | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5534917 | MacDougall | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5546530 | Grimaud et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5547439 | Rawls et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5551445 | Nashner | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5554033 | Bizzi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559995 | Browning et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5563988 | Maes et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5577981 | Jarvik | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5580249 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5587936 | Levitt et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5588104 | Lanier et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5588139 | Lanier et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591104 | Andrus et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5592401 | Kramer | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5597309 | Riess | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5598849 | Browne | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5616078 | Oh | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5638300 | Johnson | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5641288 | Zaenglein, Jr. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5659691 | Durward et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5690582 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5695431 | Bond et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5696892 | Redmann et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702323 | Poulton | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5704837 | Iwasaki et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5713794 | Shimojima et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5715834 | Bergamasco et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5826578 | Curchod | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5850201 | Lasko-Harvill et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5882204 | Iannazo et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5913727 | Ahdoot | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5925001 | Hoyt et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5933125 | Fernie et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5980256 | Carmein | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5986643 | Harvill et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987982 | Wenman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989157 | Walton | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6005548 | Latypov et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6032530 | Hock | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6054991 | Crane et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6066075 | Poulton | May 2000 | A |
| 6073489 | French et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6077201 | Cheng | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6098458 | French et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6100896 | Strohecker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6124838 | Lasko-Harvill et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6152856 | Studor et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6159100 | Smith | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6222523 | Harvill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6308565 | French et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6316934 | Amorai-Moriya et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6400374 | Lanier | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6430997 | French et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6640202 | Dietz et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6765726 | French et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6876496 | French et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7038855 | French et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7359121 | French et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7791808 | French et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0235312 | Sep 1987 | EP |
| 0275665 | Dec 1987 | EP |
| 0276125 | Jul 1988 | EP |
| 0485981 | May 1992 | EP |
| 0551962 | Jul 1993 | EP |
| 0300034 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0583061 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 0623367 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 0669758 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0534503 | Sep 1997 | EP |
| 62284666 | Dec 1987 | JP |
| 4105667 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| 5010843 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 6231 | Jan 1994 | JP |
| 8280936 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| 8101507 | Jun 1981 | WO |
| 9216267 | Oct 1992 | WO |
| 9310708 | Jun 1993 | WO |
| 9521436 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| 9717598 | May 1997 | WO |
| 9944698 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Innovative Sports Training, Inc., The Motion Monitor, Jul. 16, 1998. |
| Bandai Family Trainer Brochure, 1987. |
| Rummel, John A., et al., “Physiological Response to Exercise After Space Flight-Apollo 7 to Apollo 11”, Mar. 1973, Aerospace Medicine, vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 235-238. |
| “The Amiga Power System Joyboard”, Amiga History Guide, [retrieved online], <http://www.amigahistory.co.uk/joyboard.html>, 2 pages. |
| “Amti Model OR6-5 Biomechanics Platform Instruction Manual”, 2 pages. |
| Wannstedt, Gunilla T., et al., “Use of Augmented Sensory Feedback to Achieve Symmetrical Standing”, May 1978, vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 553-559. |
| Patterson, Stephen M., et al., “Automated physical activity monitoring: Validation and comparison with physiological and self-report measures”, Society for Psychophysiological Research, 1993, pp. 296-305. |
| Spirit 725/900, Built for Life, 2 pages. |
| Wannstedt, Gunilla et al., “Clinical Evaluation of a Sensory Feedback Device: The Limb Load Monitor”, pp. 8-49. |
| Pratt, Wanda M., et al., “A Comparison Between Computer-Controlled and Set Work Rate Exercise Based on Target Heart Rate”, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, Sep. 1991, pp. 899-903. |
| “Control Deck”, The Control Deck that puts you in Control of Incredible Fun!, Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) Instruction Manual, 1988. |
| Grabiner, Mark D., et al., “Converting Chattecx Balance System Vertical Reaction Force Measurements to Center of Pressure Excursion Measurements”, Physical Therapy, May 1993, vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 316-319. |
| Department of Health and Human Services Correspondence. |
| Harris, Gerald F., et al., “A Method for the Display of Balance Platform Center of Pressure Data”, J. Biomechanics, 1982, vol. 15, No. 10, pp. 741-745. |
| Inamura, Kinsaku et al., “Diurnal Rhythm Related to Standing Posture of a Man”, Fourth Symposium of Posturography, Sep. 1977, pp. 103-111. |
| Brogan, David C., et al., “Dynamically Simulated Characters in Virtual Environments”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 1998, pp. 1-13. |
| Hamman, Ronnalea Gayle, “Effects of Training Schedule and Age on Balance Training Utilizing Visual Feedback”, 1991, pp. 1-95. |
| Jacobsen, S., et al., “An ergometer bicycle controlled by heart rate”, Medical and Biological Engineering, Sep. 1974, pp. 675-680. |
| Stevens, Jane E., “Flights Into Virtual Reality Treating”, Science Psychology. |
| Ramey, Melvin R., “The Use of Force Plates for Jumping Research”, Department of Civil Engineering and Department of Physical Education, pp. 81-91. |
| “Force Platform”, AMTI Force and Motion. |
| Ohnishi, Noboru et al., “A Trial of Introducing Game Factor into the Rehabilitation Training”, Education & Training, pp. 406-407. |
| Reimer, Jeremy, “A history of the Amiga, part 2: The birth of Amiga”, 2 pages. |
| “Human Machine Interfaces for Teleoperators and Virtual Environments”, NASA Conference Publication, 1990. |
| “Virtual Environments and Interactivity: Windows to the Future”, SIGGRAPH '89 Panel Proceedings, pp. 7-18. |
| Ohnishi, Noboru et al., “The Introduction of Play into the Rehabilitation Training Device”, pp. 56-65. |
| Layne, CS et al., “The Application of Kistler Instrumentation for Human Performance Evaluation in the Shuttle-MIR Program”, Kistler Biomechanics News—Fall 1994. |
| Operator's Manual for Pro Balance Master Software Version 4.0, NeuroCom International, Inc., Mar. 1994. |
| Laperriere Arthur R., et al., “Microcomputer Servo-controlled Bicycle Ergometer System for Psychophysiological Research”, The Society for Psychophysiological Research, Inc., vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 201-207. |
| NES Satellite Instruction Booklet. |
| Borst, U. et al., “A New Motion Responsive Pacemaker: First Clinical Experience with an Acceleration Sensor Pacemaker”, Nov. 1992, vol. 15, pp. 1809-1814. |
| Owner's Manual and Operating Instructions, Spirit Treadmill. |
| Shumway-Cook, Anne, et al., “Postural Sway Biofeedback: Its Effect on Reestablishing Stance Stability in Hemiplegic Patients”, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, Jun. 1988, vol. 69, pp. 395-400. |
| Power Pad Instruction Manual, Nintendo. |
| Leiterman, J., “Project Puffer: Jungle River Cruise”, 1982, Atari Inc. |
| Blanchard, Chuck, “Reality Built for Two: A Virtual Reality Tool”, VPL Research Inc., pp. 35-36. |
| NES Satellite Remote Control Module, Nintendo. |
| Nashner, Lewis Michael, “Sensory Feedback in Human Posture Control”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 1970. |
| Granieri, John P. et al, “Simulating Humans in VR”, Center for Human Modeling and Simulation, Oct. 1994, pp. 1-21. |
| Simulation and Training, Division Interactive. |
| Michel, E.L. et al., “Skylab experiment M-171 “Metabolic Activity”—results of the first manned mission”, ACTA Astronautica, 1975, vol. 2, pp. 351-365. |
| Yamamoto, Masanobu, “Stereoscopic Tracking of Bodies in Motion”, Robotics Research Group, University of Oxford, pp. 109-114. |
| Mahlmann, C.V., et al., “Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Stress Analysis”, Society for Experimental Stress Analysis, 1952, vol. IX, No. 2, pp. 1-195. |
| Tech Update, Aug. 1995. |
| Janz, Kathleen F., “Validation of the CSA accelerometer for assessing children's physical activity”, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1994, pp. 369-375. |
| Fisher, S.S., et al., “Virtual Environment Display System”, Aerospace Human Factors Research Division, Oct. 1986, pp. 1-11. |
| Fletcher, JC, “Virtually Overlooked: The Power Pad games”, Joystiq, Sep. 2007, [retrieved online], <http://www.joystiq.com/2007/09/20/virtually-overlooked-th-power-pad-games/>. |
| “Virtually There”, Smart Computing, Nov. 1993, vol. 4, Issue 11. |
| Sheridan, Thomas B., et al., “Virtual Reality Check”, Technology Review, vol. 96, No. 7. |
| Sackley CM, et al., “Visual feedback after stroke with the balance performance monitor: two single-case studies”, Clinical Rehabilitation, 1993, pp. 189-195. |
| Maes, Pattie, et al., “The ALIVE System: Wireless, Full-body Interaction with Autonomous Agents”, MIT Media Laboratory, Revised Nov. 1995, Technical Report No. 257, pp. 1-17. |
| Bandai Family Trainer 4 Brochure, 1987. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100302142 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60121935 | Feb 1999 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12100551 | Apr 2008 | US |
| Child | 12856944 | US | |
| Parent | 11414990 | May 2006 | US |
| Child | 12100551 | US | |
| Parent | 11099252 | Apr 2005 | US |
| Child | 11414990 | US | |
| Parent | 10888043 | Jul 2004 | US |
| Child | 11099252 | US | |
| Parent | 10197135 | Jul 2002 | US |
| Child | 10888043 | US | |
| Parent | 09654848 | Sep 2000 | US |
| Child | 10197135 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US99/04727 | Mar 1999 | US |
| Child | 09654848 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09173274 | Oct 1998 | US |
| Child | PCT/US99/04727 | US | |
| Parent | 08554564 | Nov 1995 | US |
| Child | 09173274 | US | |
| Parent | 09034059 | Mar 1998 | US |
| Child | 08554564 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US96/17580 | Nov 1996 | US |
| Child | 09034059 | US | |
| Parent | 08554564 | Nov 1995 | US |
| Child | PCT/US96/17580 | US |
