Since the beginning of home television, audience delivery and viewership demographics have been the primary measure by which television networks have set advertising rates and by which advertisers have been willing to pay for airtime on television. The business of television is truly a numbers game—the more eyeballs watching, the more advertisers pay.
In the case of Nielsen measurement of in-home television program viewing, it is understood that gross viewership or tracking data is tallied via sampling and tracking methodologies in approximately 5,000 U.S. households, which is known as a sample set. The sample is therefore considered mathematically representative of total U.S. programming viewership in approximately 111 million television households. The tracking data collected establishes actual programming watched at various timeslots within a particular hour and day by the sample set. The actual tracking data is then scaled-up to represent total potential U.S. household viewership for each program being monitored. Ratings, generally quotients, are then applied that permit comparative assessments between programming viewing and audience delivery within a given market. Advertisers and advertising agencies have accepted these ratings as being the standard by which advertising rates are set.
In the case of in-home television, it is generally understood that programming is used to acquire an audience for the purpose of showing advertisements to viewers, and that programming desirability generates disparate audience aggregation tallies The programming may be in the form of situation comedies (“sit coms”), sporting events, reality television shows, movies, news, educational programming, and so on.
In the case of retail establishments, however, rather than having programming as in the case of in-home television to aggregate an audience, the actual goods being sold within the retail stores are the equivalent to programming that are used to draw shoppers or viewers to aggregate the shopping audiences. It is recognized that other factors, such as service, cleanliness, location, and so on, may also factor into attracting customers, but the primary draw for the shopping audience tends to be the goods being sold. In the case of out-of-home television located in retail establishments, gross audience tallies vary little as the programming (i.e., goods being sold) is consistent day-to-day, week-to-week.
For the purposes of establishing audience viewership or reach for out-of-home television located in retail establishments, historically, audience reach has been derived via cash register transaction data or tallies of purchases, whereby each transaction may represent a potential viewer. However, transaction data only accounts for the number of individuals that enter the store and actually purchase goods. Additional sampling may be used to establish how many individuals may have accompanied the shopper. The derived data (i.e., transaction data and additional sampling) from such tallies is methodologically flawed for media purposes, however, because such measurement does not establish any actual television viewing or audience reach and, as such cannot represent actual audience delivery (as described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/368,232 filed on Feb. 9, 2009, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety), in the course of a shopper traveling through aisles or those viewers that may enter the store but not purchase any goods.
Another mathematically flawed historical methodology that has been historically used is to position a few electronic displays around the outside “raceway” aisles of the retail store as it was thought that a majority of shoppers traveled in these aisles or at locations where shoppers may dwell (e.g., deli-counters or fruits and vegetable areas). Such positioning of the electronic displays has been performed primarily to save costs as it is expensive to install electronic displays in retail stores. However, placing only a few electronic displays in the outside “raceway” aisles or dwell locations has never been accepted by advertisers or media agencies as providing quantifiable basis whereby media metrics (e.g., audience reach and frequency of view of advertisements, audience reach, and audience delivery) are believed (for shopper-based audiences) to be the same or analogous as those provided by in-home television. Consequently, as a result of the historically flawed audience measurement methodologies, no quantitative assessment can be made regarding the actual number of viewers, or audience size or reach, in out-of-home television systems located in the retail establishment. Such assessment has been shown to be true by the fact that no advertising agencies or advertisers have considered out-of-home television in retail stores to provide media metrics that are the same, analogous, or backwardly compatible to in-home media metrics.
Tracking systems of shoppers within retail stores have a variety of implementations. The primary technique for tracking shoppers includes tracking shopping carts by securing a radio frequency (RF) transmitter to the shopping cart and position RF receivers throughout the store to receive RF signals from the RF transmitter. Triangulation and signal strength is typically used to specifically identify location of the RF transmitter secured to the cart as it traverses throughout the store. RF transmission and triangulation are two technically difficult technologies to contend with when operating within a retail environment for a variety of reasons. RF transmission is generally problematic when utilized in closed spaces and metallic structures exist, generally a configuration of retail stores. As understood in the art, RF transmission can have reflections, phase variations, and other RF effects that cause receiving an RF signal to be difficult to accurately determine distance from the transmitter. RF communications equipment can also be expensive to construct and install in a retail store. Furthermore, calibration is needed for RF asset tracking systems, whereby prior to use of the tracking system, someone has to walk the transmitter around the store and calibrate measurements as the transmitter is moved throughout the store. Because of installation and calibration time and cost, most companies that build and operate asset tracking systems for such retail applications, few, if any, are ever sold due to being cost prohibitive as the cost for such installed systems can typically run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
To overcome the historically flawed methodologies in measuring out-of-home television media metrics in retail environments, the principles of the present invention provide for tracking customer traffic by tracking shopping carts or individual shoppers, collectively shopping carts or shoppers, that are traversing through a retail environment so that electronic displays of an electronic display network (out-of-home television network) can be positioned to capture an audience that meets certain media metrics (e.g., audience reach or viewership, frequency of view of airtime segments). By tracking the shopping carts through the retail environment and determining which zones are passed through by percentage of total customers that shop in the retail environment, a specific number of electronic displays can be determined and positioned in locations that satisfy an audience reach criteria (e.g., 95% of shoppers), thereby limiting the total number of electronic displays that are deployed in the retail environment while providing for media metrics that are the same or substantially similar and, therefore, backwardly compatible to in-home media metrics.
The audience reach and delivery metrics can be used (i) to assure out-of-home television platform or system users, which may be advertisers and media agencies, an actual tally of viewers, or audience delivery, and (ii) to assure that all or a certain percentage of customers or traffic have seen a particular advertisement at least one time in the course of a shopping trip. Such audience reach and delivery metrics data, which are now quantifiable, may be organized in a form consistent with typical Nielsen data and assessments utilized in its in-home television viewership sampling system, as known in the art. As a result, viewership ratings that are comparable to in-home television ratings (e.g., Nielsen ratings) may be generated based on quantifiable audience viewership in the retail environment.
One embodiment of a system for tracking a shopping cart in a retail store may include a plurality of transmitter devices positioned along pathways within the retail store, and configured to communicate respective signals into the pathways. The signals may include identifiers that identify respective transmitter devices from which the signals are being communicated. A receiver device may be connected to a shopping cart, and configured to receive and record the identifiers communicated in the signals. A computing system may be configured to receive the recorded identifiers from the receiver device, process the recorded identifiers to determine a path taken by the shopping cart through the retail store, and present the path of the shopping cart taken through the retail store to a user. In one embodiment, the presentation includes time for the shopping cart to traverse through the retail store. In an alternative embodiment, the presentation of the path of the shopping cart may be included with path data of other shopping carts.
One embodiment of a method for tracking a shopping cart in a retail store may include communicating signals into the pathways from multiple locations, where the signals may include identifiers indicative of location of respective signals. The communicated signals with the identifiers may be received, and the identifiers may be recorded. The recorded identifiers may be processed to determine a path taken by the shopping cart through the retail store. The path of the shopping cart taken through the retail store may be presented to a user. In one embodiment, the presentation includes time for the shopping cart to traverse through the retail store. In an alternative embodiment, the presentation of the path of the shopping cart may be included with path data of other shopping carts.
One embodiment of a method for determining placement of an electronic device in a retail store may include scanning an indicia on the electronic device being installed in a retail store and an indicia at a location in the retail store at which the transmitter is being installed. The transmitter and location information represented by the indicia may be collected. Data based on location data of the transmitter may be generated, and a report of the data may be provided to a user. The electronic device may be a transmitter device, such as an IR transmitter. The indicia on the electronic device may be a barcode, and the indicia at the location of the transmitter being installed may be a UPC barcode on a product at the location. The generated data may include shopping cart tracking data. The reporting of the data may include statistics of the shopping cart tracking data.
A more complete understanding of the method and apparatus of the principles of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the following Detailed Description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings herein:
In order to provide for efficiency in terms of total number of electronic displays and positioning of the electronics displays that are used to form an out-of-home television network in a retail environment, the principles of the present invention provide for measuring customer traffic flow in a retail store by tracking shopping carts and/or baskets or individual shoppers as they traverse around the retail store. Zones may be established that allow a network service provider to determine through what zones customers most often travel. Customer flow and viewing metrics may be generated and used to determine locations that the electronic displays are to be positioned to capture a certain audience percentage or reach. While identifying zones of heaviest traffic allows for minimization of the number of electronic displays used to reach an audience (i.e., customers) above a desired percentage (e.g., 95% of all customers that enter the retail store), the placement of the electronic displays also provide for other media metrics, such as frequency of view by the audience and actual audience delivery totals, and as described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/368,232. In addition, the media metrics determined through use of the principles of the present invention may result in the same or similar, and, therefore, backwardly compatible media metrics as traditional in-home television so that the out-of-home television audience media metrics (e.g., audience size and frequency of play) can be aggregated or compared with in-home television media metrics, thereby harmonizing the measurement scheme between each platform. Additionally, the measurement scheme establishes a unified measure system across varying retail systems that, when coupled with media metrics (i.e., audience size and frequency of play), provides a mathematically sound extrapolative environment for audience measurement (i.e., audience delivery) from out-of-home television in a retail environment.
Cart tracking can be used for measuring retail customer traffic flows across disparate retail environments in order to establish a scientific method whereby retail customer traffic flows can be measured in accordance with standard media metrics for planning and buying an audience. These audience delivery metrics can be used (i) to assure out-of-home television platform or system users, which may be advertisers and agencies, an actual tally of viewers, (ii) to assure that all or a certain percentage of customers or traffic has seen a particular advertisement at least one time in the course of a shopping trip, and (iii) to create a basis for media ratings and comparable assessments. Such audience delivery metrics data may be organized in a form consistent with typical Nielsen data and assessments utilized in its in-home television viewer sampling system, as known in the art.
In order to resolve the audience measurement problem, the principles of the present invention provide for a system and method using a cart tracking system with low-cost construction and installation with respect to RF asset tracking systems to measure total customer traffic flows, regardless of transaction data, in various geographical locations within the retail store. The measured customer traffic flows may be utilized to determine specific placement of television screens or electronic displays to establish (i) substantially 100% audience delivery and frequency of viewing, as described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/368,232, which is incorporated herein in its entirety, to shoppers or viewers, and (ii) metrics that utilize sample data to facilitate the process of determining audience delivery and frequency of view in similar fashion to traditional in-home television so that the out-of-home television audience delivery can be aggregated with those audiences counted within in-home television, thereby harmonizing the measurement scheme between each platform. Additionally, the measurement scheme establishes a unified measure system across varying retail systems that when coupled with media metrics (e.g., audience delivery and frequency), provides a mathematically sound extrapolative environment for audience measurement (e.g., audience delivery) in out-of-home television.
With regard to
Customers have the ability to view the electronic displays from a certain distance and adequately see an image that is being displayed on the image. The distance that a viewer can adequately can view an image on an electronic display may be based on a number of electronic display parameters, including size, contrast, sharpness, resolution, content, and so on, as understood in the art. Of course, for longer distance viewing, content displayed has to be appropriate (e.g., font size should be large). By way of example, a thirteen-inch electronic display (measured along the diagonal) with suitable image parameters may be viewed at a distance between 60 and 70 feet and allow the viewer to determine the content being displayed on the electronic display. By using distance principles in combination with audience measurements, the principles of the present invention may reduce the number of electronic displays used with a retail store and still provide for media metrics (e.g., audience reach and frequency of view). In one embodiment, a distance D between electronic displays 104a and 104b may be used between electronic displays in aisle 100 so that shoppers that are traversing along the aisle 100 have the opportunity and ability to view each airtime segment being displayed on the electronic displays 106 throughout the entire length of the aisle 100.
As a summary of the operation of the electronic displays 106 that collectively form an out-of-home television network in a retail store, the electronic displays 106 may be configured to display airtime segments substantially simultaneously with one another. Advertisements and other content displayed on the electronic displays 106 may be looped. The loop is commonly known as a “wheel.” If the average shopping trip in the retail store is a multiple of the “wheel” length, then each average shopper in the retail store has the opportunity to view each airtime segment in the “wheel” that multiple number of times. For example, if the average shopping trip in the retail store is 30 minutes and the “wheel” length is 10 minutes, then each average shopper (i.e., a shopper who shops for 30 minutes) has the ability to view each airtime segment three times. If each airtime segment is 10 seconds long, then there are six airtime segments per minute and 60 every 10 minutes. Thus, the average shopper has the opportunity to view each of the 60 airtime segments three times. In the media business, if one percent of all households in a designated market area (DMA), as defined by Nielsen, have viewed an advertisement one time, that is calculated as a one rating point in a given market. If a household, or particular demographic of viewers as assessed by the media agency, views the advertisement three times, that is considered a gross rating point. By using a wheel length that is approximately one-third the average shopping trip in the retail store, both rating points and gross rating points may be delivered by the out-of-home television or electronic display network in retail stores, which collectively makes the in-store media metrics backwardly compatible with in-home television for assessing reach to a particular audience and frequency of view as is known in the art.
With regard to
Shoppers enter the retail store via entryway 212 and exit the retail store via an exit way 214. An illustrative shopper pathway 216 that a shopper takes as he or she shops in the retail store is shown. The shopper pathway 216 is shown to traverse through the wander area 210 and aisles 206. To track shopper pathways that each shopper at the retail store travels, a shopping cart tracking system, which may track shopping carts and/or baskets, may be employed. The aisles 206, wander area 210, and other pathway areas may be partitioned into zones 1-134 (note that zones 1-134 are aligned with sensors 1-134 and are used interchangeably). As the shopping carts traverse through each of the zones, the shopping cart tracking system is configured to determine which of the zones the shopping carts travel. Timestamps may be used to provide for determining length of time the shopping carts are in the respective zones and speed at which the shoppers travel through the respective zones.
With regard to
In this embodiment, the shopping cart tracking system operates using RF signals for tracking shopping carts, such as shopping cart 306. As shown, the shopping cart 306 has an RFID tag 308 mounted thereto so that the shopping cart may be tracked as it traverses around the retail store. To track the shopping cart 306, three RFID sensors 310a-310c (collectively 310), which may be RF transponders, may be configured to communicate with the RFID tag 308 by communicating RF signals A, B, and C. RFID tag 308 may be an active RFID tag and be responsive to the RF signals A, B, and C to communicate a response signal (not shown) back to the RFID sensors 310a. The RF signals A, B, and C may be 802.11 Wi-Fi® signals. Alternatively, the RFID tag 308 may be an active RFID tag and generate a beacon signal (not shown) that each of the RFID sensors 310 receive. Still yet, the RFID tag may be a passive RFID tag and respond with an RF signal in response to being excited by the RF signals A, B, and C. Alternative RF signaling may be utilized in accordance with the principles of the present invention. A computer system (not shown) may be configured to process signals received by the RFID sensors 310 to perform a triangulation measurement to determine specific location of the shopping cart 306. As is understood in the art, RF triangulation measurements may be precise, but complex, especially with closed environments with metal shelving as is typical in retail stores. It is also understood the IR sensors may be positioned on the shelves and an IR tag/transmitter may be positioned on the cart.
With regard to
Whether a cart tracking system using RF signals and triangulation (
With regard to
The shopping cart tracking system server 502 may include a processing unit 508 that executes software 510. The software 510 may be configured to process and manage cart tracking data. The processing unit 508 may be in communication with a memory 512, I/O unit 514, and storage unit 516 that may store one or more databases, flat files, or other data storage files. The I/O unit 514 may be configured to communicate locally with the shopping cart IR receiver 504 using a local wireless or wireline communications protocol, or remotely via a communications network, such as the Internet, mobile telephone communications network, satellite communications network, or combination thereof using the appropriate communications protocols.
The shopping cart IR receiver 504 may be configured with a processing unit 518 that executes software 520. The processing unit may be in communication with a memory 522, one or more IR sensors 524, I/O unit 526, and clock 528. The IR sensor(s) 524 may be configured to receive IR signals 530a-530n (collectively 530) communicated from the IR tags 506 positioned on shelves and other locations in the retail store. The clock 528 may be a real-time clock (e.g., date and time) and be configured to generate clock data signals for the processing unit 518 to timestamp data received from the IR tags 506 via the IR sensor(s) 504. Alternatively, the clock 528 may be a clock that provides relative time without being associated with time-of-day.
The IR tags 506 may be configured with a processing unit 532 that executes software (not shown) to operate the IR tags 506. The processing unit 532 may be in communication with a memory 534 and IR transmitter 536. The IR transmitter 536 may be configured to generate one or more IR signal 530 for the IR sensor(s) 524 on the shopping cart IR receiver 504 to receive. In an alternative embodiment, rather than including a processing unit 532, IR tags that have a configuration similar to a television remote control that does not use a processing unit may be utilized to perform the same or analogous functionality as described with regard to the IR tags 506. The IR signals 530 may include IR tag data 538a-538n (collectively 538) that includes an IR tag ID that is unique within the retail store to identify which of the particular IR tags 506 in the retail store is communicating the IR signal. In addition, if the configuration of the IR transmitter 536 includes a left, right, and center IR light emitting diode (LED), the IR signal 530 may include a left, right, and/or center indicator that enables the processing unit 518 to collect direction of travel information without having to perform processing to determine direction.
In operation, as a shopper is pushing a shopping cart through a retail store, the IR tags 506 are communicating IR tag data 538 via the IR signals 530. As the shopping cart IR receiver 504 is pushed in the field-of-view of the IR signals 530, the IR sensor(s) 524 receive the IR tag data 538. The processing unit 518, in response to receiving the IR tag data 538 via the IR signals 530, may timestamp the IR tag data 538 and store the timestamped IR tag data, which is now data that is representative of cart movement (i.e., cart data or cart tracking data), in the memory 522. The processing unit 518 may be configured to store the cart data for later communication to the shopping cart tracking system server 502. In one embodiment, cart data 540, which may be the timestamped IR tag data, may be communicated to the shopping cart tracking system server 502 via a communications path 542, such as a wireless communications path (e.g., 802.11 communications protocol), (ii) hardwire communications path, or (iii) portable device (e.g., laptop computer) that, in turn, communicates the timestamped IR tag data to the shopping cart tracking system server 502 using a wireless or hardwired communications protocol. If the processing unit 518 processes the timestamped IR tag data to generate summary shopping cart tracking data or otherwise, then that cart data 540 may also be communicated to the shopping cart tracking system server 502. Alternatively, rather than using the shopping cart tracking system server 502, the portable device or non-portable device (e.g., desktop computer) may be utilized to perform the same or analogous functionality as the shopping cart tracking system server 502.
With regard to
With regard to
As the shopper pathway 216 shows, the customer passed through the following zones:
A (store entrance) 133-134-132-112-110-11-9-25-24-23-26-27-28-31-30-29-37-36-35-42-41-40-43-46-47-48-88-87-85-51-50-49-55-56-57-82-81-80-79 -76-77-78-72-71-70-90-64-65-66-60-59-58-89-117-92-93-94-101-100-99-98-131-124-125-126 B4-B3 (Checkout Area).
TABLE I below provides for shopping cart metrics collected and generated by the shopping cart tracking system 500 (
Based on the path information collected and generated by the shopping cart IR receiver 504, shopping cart tracking system server 502, and/or network service provider server 602, graphs that indicate path and velocity may be generated, as provided in
With regard to
With regard to
With regard to
With further reference to
By compiling cart tracking information from multiple shoppers, a chart showing the number of shoppers that passed through zones (See,
A variety of decisions may be made in configuring and operating the out-of-home television network based on the shopper metric data collected and generated by the shopping cart tracking system and, optionally, remote computing system, such as the network service provider server 602 (
With regard to
At step 1204, the retail store may be partitioned into reference zones. A variety of different reference zone configurations may be utilized. If the retail store or a new retail store configuration is being measured for the first time, then shorter reference zones may be utilized to provide more resolution. If the retail store configuration has been measured in the past, then longer reference zones may be utilized since the network service provider or 3rd party ratings provider may already have a basic idea of shopper traffic flow in that retail store configuration. In one embodiment, the reference zones may be formed of regularly spaced rows and columns, such as those provided in a planogram, as understood in the art. Alternatively, non-regular reference zones may be utilized. Still yet, the reference zones may be configured according to product category. Non-categorically arranged reference zones may alternatively be utilized.
At step 1206, tracking of the shopping carts may be performed. The tracking may begin at the beginning of the shopping trip and end at the cash register or when the shopper leaves the tagged shopping cart within the store without purchase. The tracking system may record each unique shopper as the shopping cart is pushed through the zones in the store. Velocity of travel may be determined, as well. In the course of a single shopping trip, it is understood that a shopper may repeat or re-circuit various areas of the store, and such movement may be tracked. It should be understood that the shopping cart tracking system may be configured to perform certain processing, such as determining total shopping time, velocity through zones, average velocity through the store, direction of travel through zones, and so on. In an alternative embodiment, another computer system may be configured to receive “raw” data collected by the shopping cart tracking system and perform the processing.
In addition to the processing for determining various shopper metrics about the shopper while shopping, another metric that retailers have heretofore been unable to quantitatively determine is the amount of time it takes shoppers to pass through a checkout station, either via a personnel operated cash register or self-checkout system. In one embodiment, each of the checkout lines may be configured as a zone so that shoppers that enter the respective zones may be tracked for the time that the shopper takes to pass through the zone. Because the shoppers are no longer potential purchasers, information about the time taken to pass through the checkout line is substantially inconsequential for media metrics purposes. However, the checkout line data may be helpful for retail store operators to improve efficiency of their retail store operations.
At step 1208, the data of the shopping carts movement through the retail store over a time period may be collected. The time period may be any time period desired by a user or be configured to automatically collect the data for a predetermined time period, such as one week. The data collected may include positions of the shopping carts and timestamps along with each of the positions within the retail store. In addition, data representative of the pathways, directional movement, velocity of travel within each zone may be collected, as well. Whether the data is collected by the shopping cart IR receiver or at a remote system by using RF triangulation techniques, the collected data may be communicated to a remote location for further processing to aggregate shopping cart tracking data from multiple shopping carts.
At step 1210, the collected data may be assessed. The assessment may include determining average shopper travel velocity, pathways that shoppers aggregate, locations, and direction of travel that shoppers travel within the zones, for example. Additional information may be assessed, as well.
At step 1212, a determination may be made as to locations for electronic displays of an in-store television network to be positioned. The determination may be made based on parameters of electronic displays and traffic patterns of shoppers that travel through common zones in the retail store. If, for example, 80% of shoppers travel through a certain pathway, then at least one electronic display may be positioned to capture that traffic. Based on an average amount of time that shoppers spend in the zone, a determination may be made as to how many airtime segments may be viewed on the electronic display(s) positioned to service that zone. There is a balance between having too many and too few electronic displays to provide opportunities for customers to view the airtime segments, where the balance is made based on the parameters of the electronic displays (e.g., size of electronic display, resolution, contrast, etc.) and traffic flow.
At step 1214, zones may be set for the in-store television network. Based on the shopper traffic flow determined in
The process 1200 of
With regard to
At step 1314, a determination may be made as to whether the audience metrics are the same or substantially the same (i.e., within a couple of percentage points) as previously measured. The previous measurement may be the measurement made when setting up the in-store television network. If not, the process continues at step 1316, where addition, repositioning, or removal of the electronic displays may be performed based on the shopper traffic and electronic displays, as previously described with respect to
Resulting from the process 1300, a network service provider may recertify that placement of the electronic displays and the zones originally established for the electronic displays are still adequate for delivering an audience. The measurement scheme utilizing shopper velocity data may be used to certify or determine an actual number of video messages (e.g., 10-second advertisements) that a shopper can view in each zone as the shoppers travel in the store. The audience tally or reach may now be established and certified by the tracking process while re-sampling may be used to assure that the previous data assessments remain correct. If the re-sampling determines directional changes, aggregate flow changes, shopper velocity changes, and/or shopper pathway changes, the placement of the television screens may be adjusted to properly deliver media metrics (i.e., reach and frequency, delivery) that advertisers and agencies are sold. It should be understood that other factors may be used to instigate re-sampling, including changes to product placement within the retail store, changing of store layout, seasonal changes (e.g., summer versus winter), and so forth.
The process described in
As described above, Nielsen in-home television measures aggregate programming viewership within predetermined time allotments. Through the use of the above-described process, the same metrics can now be determined in the out-of-home television environment. The principles of the present invention certify that the audience viewership in a retail establishment, or one or more retail chains, is factually delivered in a methodologically sound form, while accommodating differential shopper traffic flows in separate retail locations, whereby traditional media assessments and purchasing can be performed by those individuals familiar with assessing and purchasing in-home television as is known in the art. Such measurement permits traditional arithmetic and quotient-based ratings assessments as is known in the art.
While Nielsen measures common viewer blocks of time within in-home television programming whereby viewership is sampled, the principles of the present invention measures common zones of travel through product offering, or retail-style programming, within a retail location and time traveled within the zones whereby viewership is sampled. As a result, media metrics for the out-of-home television network match, or are substantially similar to Nielsen's media metrics for in-home television so that advertisers and media agencies are provided with information that is readily understandable.
The shopper metrics collected from the process of
(i) the specific path taken during any of the monitored shopping trips;
(ii) the velocity with which a shopper passed any of the sensors;
(iii) number of shoppers who pass a particular sensor during a specific period of time;
(iv) direction of shoppers. As an example, a determination may be made as to how many shoppers passed a specific location moving from left to right versus how many shoppers passed from right to left;
(v) average velocity of shoppers passing a particular sensor in each direction;
(vi) how many shoppers at least partially re-circuit the store
(vii) number of ads viewed in each zone based on average speed of shoppers in each zone;
(viii) number of ads viewed in the retail store based on average speed of shoppers in the retail store;
(ix) feet traveled in the retail store;
(x) incomplete trips of shoppers (i.e., shoppers who stop shopping and leave without purchasing; and
(xi) average time to pass through checkout on a per employee or line basis.
The end result of using the system and methodologies described herein provides data that may be used to generate a linear function of viewing time and distance of audience members (i.e., shoppers). By generating the linear function, positioning of electronic displays may be made in such a way that maximizes viewership and minimizes the number of electronic displays, thereby producing an in-store network that has an audience that includes substantially every shopper that enters the store in a cost effective manner. In one embodiment, a calculation may be made in the following manner: 50 ads/wheel×7 second ads/60 seconds/minute=5.8 minutes×3 views per ad=17.5 minutes of viewing time that has to be aggregated. To account for the full 17.5 minutes of viewing time, zones over which a certain percentage of shoppers travel and spend a determined amount of time using the tracking system may be determined for placement of the electronic displays. By tracking shopper traffic, a scientific methodology may result in accurate audience measurement, which allows a network service provider to accurately position the electronic displays, retailers to better design their stores, advertisers to monitor effectiveness of their advertising, and advertising media agencies to plan and buy the retail-based audience delivery with metrics that are substantially similar to traditional television metrics for planning and buying audiences.
With regard to
With regard to
The GUI 1500 may be interactive in that a user may have the ability to draw zones, such as zone A displayed on the store layout 1506. As shown, zone A includes at least a portion of IR tags 17, 18, and 19. As described below, shopper data that is collected by the IR receivers that includes IR tags 17, 18, and 19 being detected may be associated with zone A.
As further shown in
In addition, another table 1514 may be presented to the user to display detailed shopper data. The shopper data may include: “Zone,” “Type,” “Times Entered,” “Feet Traveled,” “Avg. Speed,” “Ads Viewed,” “% of Delivery,” “Times Entered,” “Feet Traveled,” “Avg. Speed,” “Ads Viewed,” “Incomplete Trips,” “Incomplete Trips %,” “Recircuits.” The table may show whether the shopper entered from the left, right, top, or bottom of the zone to provide additional traffic pattern information. Incomplete trips are indicative of shoppers start shopping, but leave without completing a transaction (e.g., leaving the cart in the store without passing through checkout). As shown, the shopper data is shown on a per zone basis. It should be understood, however, that alternative bases may be used to present the data in accordance with the principles of the present invention. Ultimately, the shopper data displayed may be used to assist the user in defining zones that may be used to identify where a certain percentage of shoppers (e.g., 100%) (reach) travel so that each shopper has the ability to view each airtime segment a certain number of times (frequency of view).
The process provided in associated with
With further reference to
Each of the IR transmitters 410 are shown to have a transmission angle extending from the IR tags, where the transmission angle is established by transmission angles of LEDs that are used in the IR tags. A number of different configurations may used to establish the transmission angle of each of the IR tags, as shown in
With regard to
With regard to
With regard to
With regard to
Whether operating in (i) single LED mode, (ii) dual LED mode, (iii) dual LED mode with left/right codes, (iv) tri-LED mode, (v) tri-LED mode with left/right/center codes, or otherwise, the IR signals may be transmitted or communicated three times in a row and then shut down for a certain time duration (e.g., one second) to save battery power. In communicating the IR signals three times in a row, the IR signals may be burst or activated on and off three cycles in a row to communicate data packets that may include IR tag code and/or other data and then shut down. Alternatively, the IR signals may be turned on and the content may be communicated three times in a row during that illumination period. It should be understood that alternative communication techniques or protocols, such as communicating the IR tag codes five times in a row, using frequency shift keying, etc., may be utilized in accordance with the principles of the present invention. If using the left/right or left/right/center LED mode, then the left LED may communicate an IR signal with a “left” code, the right LED may communicate an IR signal with a “right” code, and, optionally, the center LED may communicate an IR signal with a “center” code so as to provide for directionality of movement of a shopping cart as the shopping cart passes from right to left or left to right in front of the IR tag.
The use of IR transmitter and receiver components significantly reduces cost and complexity for tracking carts throughout the retail environment, as compared to using RF triangulation technology. As further described with regard to
Cart tracking provides a retailer and network service provider of an in-store media network a number of data points, including (i) zones in which shoppers travel, (ii) directions in which shoppers travel through each zone, (iii) numbers of shoppers in each zone, (iv) velocities through zones that shoppers travel, and (v) shopping trip times. The different configurations of the IR tags (i.e., single or multiple LEDs) can both be used to determine the five different data points identified above and possibly others not listed. However, computation complexity after data collection from the IR receiver on the shopping cart may be reduced by using the IR tags with two or three LEDs and communicating different left, right, and/or center codes via the left, right, and/or center LEDs, thereby enabling the IR receiver to collect data that immediately allows for determination as to whether the cart passed the IR tag from left to right or from right to left. Otherwise, in the case of using a single LED, the collection system can determine direction by sequencing the collected IR tag data, optionally on a map or data representative of a map, and determining direction of travel of the cart using that data and knowing actual positioning of the IR tags within the store or relative positioning of the IR tags with respect to one another.
In one embodiment, the IR signals may use the Sony SIRC communication protocol. Through the use of a standard protocol, a standard chipset may be utilized for communicating data, in this case IR transmitter codes, “left,” “right,” and/or “center” codes, battery voltage codes, etc.
With regard to
With regard to
Each of the IR transmitters may have physical switch settings (e.g., dip switches) that provides for setting different modes of operation. TABLE I shows operating modes and associated switch settings of switches 4-7. Because there are four switch settings, up to 16 different modes may be provided (e.g., tri-LED mode, left/right/center mode, etc.). Dual LED mode may provide for left and right LEDs that output the same data (e.g., IR tag identifier) as opposed to dual mode with left/right codes, which provides for some of the same data (e.g., IR tag identifier) and different data (e.g., “left” and “right” codes) to be output by each of the left and right LEDs.
TABLE II shows switch settings for adjusting communication range of an IR transmitter, which is based on power applied to each LED, by setting switches 1 and 2. Each of the ranges may be set based on different distances that the IR transmitters have to communicate. For example, since an IR transmitter that is positioned in a grocery store aisle may have a maximum of three feet to communicate, where three feet represents approximately half of an aisle since a shopping cart will typically be positioned within that distance as it travels along the aisle, the IR transmitter may be set to a low range. However, where an IR transmitter is positioned in a wander area of a retail store, such as in a produce section within a grocery store, shopping carts may travel at longer distances from the IR transmitter such that the IR transmitter may be set to a high range. The switch settings for power may be set as the IR transmitters are being installed or preset by a manufacturer or network operator and labeled as “Low,” “Low-Medium Range,” “Medium-High Range,” and “High Range,” so that people installing the IR transmitters in the retail store may select the proper IR transmitter without having to make any in-store switch adjustments. Alternatively, rather than using relative range markings, estimated actual distances (e.g., “3 feet,” “6 feet,” “9 feet,” “15 feet”) that each of the settings may produce may be used to label the IR transmitters.
TABLE III shows an illustrative data packet format, where each data packet is sent out in the format inclusive of each of the 12-bits. As shown, bits 11-9 are three bits to represent a battery voltage level, bit 8 represents left and right LED (e.g., “0” for left, “1” for right), and bits 7-0 represent IR tag code. By using an 8-bit IR tag code (bits 7-0), each store may have 256 IR tags without duplication, as described above. It should be understood that the use of more or fewer bits may provide for different numbers of IR tags within a retail store. It should also be understood that the data packet format may be different to provide for different or additional data. For example, rather than using three bits for battery voltage, thereby providing for seven different levels, two or one bit may be utilized, thereby providing for four levels (e.g., high, medium, low, replace battery) or two levels (e.g., power sufficient, replace battery), respectively. By changing the format, additional bits may be used for the IR tag code so as to provide for more than 256 IR tags within a single store.
TABLE IV provides codes that may be associated with different battery voltage ranges. The different battery ranges are illustrative and may vary based on a battery voltage used for the IR transmitters or other factors.
With regard to
In one embodiment, the processing unit 1902 may execute the software 1904 that may be configured to generate data packets. The data packets may include (i) IR tag numbers, as may be set by the switches 1910 or alternatively stored in the memory 1906 by a manufacturer or operator, (ii) LED identifiers (e.g., left or right), and (iii) battery voltage code, as previously described herein. As shown and described above, the IR tag may include one or more LEDs 1908 that are used to communicate IR signals that are identical or in-part different from one another. Using left, right, and center LEDs allows coverage area to be adjusted or functionality to be increased, as previously described.
In addition to the data communicating LED(s), one or more status indicator LED(s) 1912 may be utilized. The status indicator LED(s) 1912 may be red, green, or multi-color (e.g., red/green), as understood in the art. The status indicator LED(s) 1912 may be utilized to provide a visual indication of battery power and/or notification (e.g., flashing LED, color change) that battery power is low. Although not shown, driving electronics for driving the LEDs may be included as part of the processing unit 1902 or LED(s) 1908.
Voltage supply range may be between 3.7V and 6V in one embodiment. Having such a wide supply range maximizes battery usage. A battery voltage sensor circuit (not shown) may also be included in the IR tag 1900 to enable the processing unit 1902 to determine a code associated with the battery voltage as positioned in a set of battery voltage ranges, as provided in TABLE IV. A voltage regulator drive circuit (not shown) may be used to ensure that the IR LEDs are driven at a constant current regardless of the supply voltage, thereby providing a more consistent effective range for the transmitter. Analog-to-digital (A/D) and digital-to-analog (D/A) devices (not shown) may be utilized in conjunction with the LEDs, as understood in the art. In a multi-LED configuration, because the distance from the center LED 1908b to an IR receiver may be shorter than the distance from the left 1908a or right 1908c LEDs to the same IR receiver affixed to a shopping cart as the cart passes in front of the IR tag 1900 due to the left and right optical beams being directed at diagonal angles, power for driving the left 1908a and right 1908c LEDs may be regulated slightly higher than power to the center LED to account for the differences in distance.
With regard to
Electronic boards (not shown) that include electronics provided in
With regard to
With regard to
At step 2708, data based on the position data of the transmitters may be generated. As an example, the data may include number of shopping carts that pass by a specific product and length of time that each shopping cart spent in front of a specific product. By enabling the installer to scan the barcode 2114 of the IR transmitter 2104 and a product, installation of the IR transmitter and creating a data record of the locations of the transmitter 2104 is simplified. In other words, by simply scanning an indicia associated with the IR transmitter 2104 and barcode associated with a particular location (e.g., product UPC code) at which the IR transmitter 2104 is being positioned, a system that processes shopping cart tracking data may use the information collected as the devices are being installed without further human intervention. At step 2710, a report of the data may be presented to a user. The data may be a list of IR transmitters including the IR transmitter 2104 along with an associated position (e.g., product name, aisle, and/or X-Y-Z coordinates) in the retail store.
In one embodiment, the computing device may additionally store data representative of a map, such as a planogram maintained by the retail store or network service provider, that lists specific shelving configurations and specific locations on the shelves at which the products are located. The IR transmitters may therefore be associated with specific locations on the map, which may provide for actual and/or relative positioning of the IR transmitters. In one embodiment, to ensure location accuracy, the IR transmitters may be positioned using a certain placement, such as in alignment with a left, right, or center of a product display, if scanning a product UPC barcode to identify location. The specific locations may enable shopping cart tracking data, such as number of shopping carts that pass through a zone of a pathway, to be generated as a function of the specific locations of the IR transmitters. Reporting of the data may include statistics of the shopping cart tracking data, such as time through particular zones or entire store. The shopping cart tracking data may also be integrated with other shopping cart tracking data and be considered to be reported as part of broader statistics. It should be understood that as an alternative to scanning barcodes, the installer may enter identifiers into a graphical user interface to collect the information that may be used to determine location information of the IR transmitter 2104.
While some applications of the IR transmitters may utilize specific dimensional locations of the IR transmitters, other applications may utilize the fact that the IR transmitters are positioned in front of a certain product, such as a particular brand of soft drink (e.g., tracking how long a shopper is in front of the soft drink). It should be understood that this same location determination process may be utilized for installing other electronic or non-electronic equipment on shelves or other fixtures in the retail store.
With regard to
The processing unit 2202 may further be in communication with the memory 2208 that is configured to store received data from IR tags, IR sensor 2206 that is configured to receive IR communications from the IR tags, and I/O unit 2212 that enables the IR receiver 2200 to communicate IR tag data to a computing system either local to (e.g., personal computer connected to or in the local vicinity of the IR receiver 2200) or remote from (e.g., server located in a remote location of the retail store) the IR receiver (see, for example,
Analog-to-digital (A/D) and digital-to-analog (D/A) devices (not shown) may be utilized in conjunction with the IR sensor 2206. In one embodiment, the IR receiver 2200 is a “dummy” receiver in that it merely collects data, and a computing system that collects IR tag data from the IR receiver processes the data. Alternatively, the IR receiver 2200 may process the collected IR tag data to determine shopping cart path, zones, velocity, etc., or some portion thereof.
With regard to
Because the IR receiver 2300 will be brought into various weather conditions, such as rain and snow, gaskets 2314 may be placed at each of the IR sensor openings and an IR transparent material (e.g., red plastic material) 2316 may be positioned between the gasket 2314 and IR sensor opening 2312 such that the IR sensor in combination with the gasket 2314 can receive IR signals, but prevent water from entering the casing 2306. By including IR sensors on both sides of the IR receiver 2300, the IR receiver 2300 may detect IR signals from IR tags from either side of an aisle while traveling in either direction. It should be understood that an IR sensor opening may also be included on the top and bottom of the casing top 2306b to enable IR tags to be positioned above and below the pathways in the retail store, as well.
The IR receiver 2300 may be positioned on the front grill 2302 of the shopping cart in a position such that when the cart is inserted into the rear of another cart, generally known as being “nested,” the IR receiver 2300 does not contact the rear of the other cart. As understood in the art, the rear of carts and front grill of carts are angled such that the top front edge of a cart contacts the rear of a cart, while the remainder of the front grill does not contact the rear of the other cart. By positioning the IR receiver below a certain distance from the top of the front grill 2302, the IR receiver 2300 may avoid contacting other carts when nested, thereby reducing chance of damage to the IR receiver 2300. It should be understood that different carts have different configurations such that the distance below the top may vary from cart type to cart type. It should also be understood that the IR receiver 2300 may be mounted on alternative locations of the cart and still operate as described herein. In addition to mounting locations, the casing of the IR transceiver 2300 may be thin enough (e.g., maximum of 2-inches deep) such that the casing does not extend beyond a distance that would otherwise allow the IR receiver 2300 to contact a rear end of another cart to which the cart is being nested. The casing may be formed of high-strength plastic or other material to protect the electronics.
With regard to
At step 2410, battery voltage may be read. From the battery voltage, a battery voltage code associated with battery voltage may be generated at step 2412, where the battery voltage code may be the same or analogous to those provided in TABLE IV. At step 2414, one or more data packets may be created. In creating the data packets, IR tag identifier, battery voltage code, and optionally left/right/center code may be included in the data packet(s). The data packet(s) may also include a preamble. A postamble may optionally included in the data packet(s), as well. At step 2416, the data packet(s) may be communicated via an LED or other illumination device. In communicating the data packet(s), the data packet(s) may be communicated more than once, such as three times. If the IR tag includes left and right LEDs, then the data packet may be communicated by the left LED first and then the second LED second, where the data packets communicated by the left LED and right LED may be the same or distinguished by a “left” and “right” bits, as previously described. In an alternative embodiment, the left and right LEDs may be communicated simultaneously. If the IR tag includes three LEDs, then the left, right, and center may be used to communicate in a sequence or simultaneously.
At step 2418, after the data packet(s) are communicated, a delay or sleep may occur. The delay or sleep may be used to reduce battery power usage. The delay may be one second long or otherwise. However, the delay should be set such that each IR receiver that is pushed past an IR tag receives a communication from the IR tag. In one embodiment, an IR tag synchronization process may occur, where an in-store global “beacon” or one or more IR tags may operate as “beacons” to which slave IR tags may synchronize, thereby causing each IR tag to communicate at approximately the same time (e.g., within a few milliseconds of one another).
With regard to
At step 2512, a determination may be made as to whether a request or event trigger to communicate the collected data is made. If either a request or event trigger occurs, then at step 2514, the stored or collected IR tag data and timestamp may be communicated or uploaded to a computing device. A request may be made by a user connecting a computer to the IR receiver either via a physical wire or via a wireless connection (e.g., using Bluetooth or other communications protocol). In one embodiment, an event trigger for communication of the IR tag data and timestamps may be a periodic upload event trigger, where the periodic upload event trigger may be set as daily or weekly on a receiving device or at a computing device that sends wireless requests to the IR receiver. Still yet, the event trigger may be a determination that the memory is full. Any other event trigger may be utilized to cause the IR tag data and timestamps to be uploaded, such as in response to receiving IR tag data at a checkout line, which, in effect, causes the IR receiver to upload data after each shopping trip. If, at step 2514, no request or event trigger occurs, then the process repeats the process back at step 2506.
With regard to
Although the principles of the present invention have been described as mounting IR tags to fixtures of the retail store, it should be understood that a reverse configuration may be utilized, where an IR tag is affixed to the shopping carts and IR receivers are affixed to the retail shelves. Such a configuration, however, may result in higher costs due to having more receivers, more complex communications, and less efficient battery usage. In yet an alternative embodiment, rather than using an optical configuration, low power level RF communications, including the use of active or passive RFID devices, may be utilized. In one embodiment, the active or passive RFID tags may substitute the IR tags positioned along the pathways, as described hereinabove. However, such a configuration may be more costly and difficult to implement due to the inherent nature of RF interacting in electromagnetic noisy environments due to large amounts of metal in retail stores.
While description describes the principles of the present invention as being primarily utilized within retail stores, it should be understood that the principles of the present invention may be used with retail environments. Retail environments may include shopping malls, airports, stadiums, arenas, museums, department stores, drug stores, and any other place where people aggregate.
It should further be understood that in addition to the retail environments, that people in non-retail environments may be tracked. As an example, tracking specific vehicles throughout a roadway multiple roadways may be tracked and zones may be established to determine placement of signs, electronic and/or non-electronic, and audience delivery for content displayed on the signs. By tracking specific vehicles rather than total vehicle count without identifying particular vehicles, media metrics may be better determined. For example, by knowing specific vehicles that travel a certain stretch of highway, a determination may be made as to how many of the same people had the opportunity to view a single advertisement a certain number of times. In tracking the specific vehicles, toll-tags of the vehicles, other electronic devices that may be installed in the vehicles, license plates, or other identifying means may be monitored and tracked. If, for example, license plates are used, imaging software may be utilized to perform identification of the license plate number. Software executed on a computing system may track zones in which the vehicles travel on the roadway.
In addition, the principles of the present invention allow customer or shopper data to be collected using non-shopping cart and non-basket techniques. Such techniques may provide for tags or sensors to be carried or worn by a user (e.g., hand-held device or badge attached to clothing) to track the person with the tags or sensors as the customers travel throughout the retail environment.
The previous detailed description of a small number of embodiments for implementing the invention is not intended to be limiting in scope. One of skill in this art will immediately envisage the methods and variations used to implement this invention in other areas than those described in detail.
This Application for Letters Patent is a Continuation-in-Part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/848,852 filed Aug. 2, 2010, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/230,338 filed Jul. 31, 2009, and further claims priority to co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/315,751 filed Mar. 19, 2010; the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61230338 | Jul 2009 | US | |
61315751 | Mar 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12848852 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13052946 | US |