The present invention generally relates to determining train position, and more particularly, to determining train position in automated train systems with no internal drive.
It is known to sense a train's position by using an arrangement of proximity sensors located so as to sense both a train's side plate and each wheel of the train as it approaches and passes a drive station, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,140,202 for “Method of Controlling a Rail Transport System for Conveying Bulk Materials” the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Although the train position determination systems and methods employed therein have been found effective, further improvements are possible.
In view of the foregoing, it is an object of the present invention to provide improved systems and methods for sensing train position. According to an embodiment of the present invention, a train system comprises a track extending in a travel direction, a plurality of cars riding on the track and connected to form a train, a position sensing unit, and a programmable logic controller (PLC) in signal communication with the position sensing unit and configured to determine a train position based on inputs therefrom.
In one position sensing unit embodiment, each of the plurality of cars has a substantially identical car length in the travel direction and there are a plurality of car detection elements on the plurality of cars. Each of the plurality of car detection elements has a substantially identical detection element length in the travel direction, the detection element length being less than the car length.
The position sensing unit includes a first position sensor arranged along the track responsive to the presence and absence of each of the plurality of car detection elements and a second position sensor arranged along the track responsive to the presence and absence of each of the plurality of car detection elements and separated from the first position sensor in the travel direction by a first sensor spacing, the first sensor spacing being less than the detection element length.
According to an alternate position sensing unit embodiment, the cars are connected in a car order and a plurality of data tags are arranged on the plurality of cars, each of the plurality of data tags storing a unique identifier. The position sensing unit includes a data tag reader arranged along the track and operable to detect each of the plurality of data tags in sequence and read the unique identifiers therefrom. The programmable logic controller stores a list of the unique identifiers corresponding to the car order and is configured to determine a train position based on inputs from the position sensing unit and the stored list.
These and other objects, aspects and advantages of the present invention will be better appreciated in view of the drawings and following detailed description of preferred embodiments.
Referring to
Referring also to
Referring to
Each car 30 carries a car detection element 40, to the presence and absence of which the position sensing units 22 are responsive. The car detection element 40 can be an integral part of the car, or mounted onto the car. In the depicted embodiment, the car detection element 40 is a metal member elongated in the travel direction 16 and attached to the bottom of each car 30. Preferably the length of the car detection element 40 in the travel direction is less than the car length. For example, the car detection element 40 can be an approximately 1 inch×2 inch×4 foot metal tube mounted to the bottom of an approximately 8 foot long car.
Referring to
Referring to
In the depicted embodiment, the sensors 50, 52, 54 are very preferably proximity sensors, such as inductive proximity sensors, that are responsive to the presence and absence of the car detection elements 40 without making physical contact therewith. Preferably, the sensors 50, 52, 54 are highly unresponsive to nonmetallic objects, and to any objects outside of their nominal range. With no moving parts and largely immune to interference from dust and dirt, such sensors can function very reliably with little or no maintenance in many harsh environments.
There are most preferably at least two position sensors, and the depicted embodiment includes first, second and third sensors 50, 52, 54. The first and second position sensors 50, 52 are separated in the travel direction 16, by a first sensor spacing 60. The third sensor 54 is separated from the second sensor 52 in the travel direction 16 by a second sensor spacing 62. The first and third sensors 50, 54 are separated in the travel direction 16 by a third sensor spacing 64, which is equal to the sum of the first and second sensor spacings 60, 62. Although different numbers and spacings of sensors could be used, the following spacing properties are particularly advantageous:
With the exemplary detection element length of approximately 4 feet and the car length of approximately 8 feet provided above, advantageous approximate measurements for the first, second and third sensor spacings are 2 feet, 3 feet and 5 feet, respectively.
The PLC 24 is in signal communication with the drive units 20 and the position sensing units 22. Generally speaking, the PLC determines train position from the position sensing units 22 and controls the drive units 20 (for example, through one or more VFDs) based thereon. As used herein “signal communication” refers to communication effective to convey data. Various wired and/or wireless communications devices could be employed to effectuate signal communication between these components.
The determination of “train position,” as used herein, refers broadly to the determination of the physical location of the train and/or derivatives thereof, such as train velocity and train acceleration/deceleration. The present invention is primarily focused on improved systems and methods for determining train position—the methods by which the PLC uses the determined train position to control trains can vary considerably within the scope of the present invention. However, the present invention is particularly advantageous when used in support of a control routine like that in U.S. Pat. No. 8,140,202, referenced above, where the PLC synchronizes drive wheel speeds between drive stations as a train passes from one drive station to the next.
A “PLC” should generally be understood to be a computer device equipped to receive sensor inputs and generating control outputs, and programmable with one or more control routines governing the operational relationship between the inputs and outputs. While the PLC is preferably a purpose-built PLC, such as are marketed for that purpose, the present invention is not necessarily limited thereto.
Referring to
Each of the position sensors has a high/on output, indicative of the presence of a detection element 40 and a low/off output, indicative of the absence of a detection element 40 (although these states could be reversed while preserving the overall functionality described herein).
In
Without discussing sensor C for the moment, it will be appreciated that use of two sensors (A and B), spaced apart by less than the length of a detection element, offer a very reliable indicator that a car has passed over the sensors—without the need for extra debounce logic to rule out the possibility of intermittent false sensor responses. Before the PLC will count a car as having passed it will need to see the following events, in the following order (for the forward direction—the order would be reversed for a car passing in the opposite direction):
The likelihood of this order of events occurring without a car actually passing over the sensors is extremely remote. Also, the identification of spurious sensor activations for error detection purposes is also relatively straightforward, and an appropriate warning or indication can be made by the PLC.
Including the third sensor (C) further reduces the likelihood of a spurious recognition—a car count would further require:
Besides further minimizing the possibility of a spurious count, the addition of a third sensor is of significant value where a plurality of connected cars are to be sensed. At the position of
While the spacing of two sensors could be adjusted to have sensor B remain high until the next car triggered sensor A, this result would potentially be ambiguous with a reversal of train direction that would re-trigger sensor A. In the depicted embodiment, the reversal possibility would be ruled out because sensor B would need to transition high again (and sensor C transition low) before a reversal could result in re-triggering sensor A. Also, a car count beginning with all sensors low clearly indicates the beginning of a train, while a car count ending with all sensors low clearly indicates the end of a train. The differing first and second sensor spacings 60, 62 further facilitate discrimination between different train-related events.
While the foregoing represents a robust method and system for reliably and accurately determining train position, the present invention is not necessarily limited thereto. For example, the position sensing unit 122 could be used alongside other position sensing components, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,140,202. Also, other position sensing units 122 could be employed.
For example, referring to
By reading the identifiers, the PLC knows the position of every car in the train 14. This train position can be used to control the drive stations 20 substantially as described in connection with the foregoing embodiment. Additionally, if the position sensing unit 122 fails to read an identifier where and when expected—possibly corresponding to a missing or damaged data tag 140, the PLC 24 can be configured to bring the train 14 to a controlled stop until the problem is resolved. Also, the identifiers can identify not only individual cars but classes or types of car. Thus, the PLC 24 can also intervene if identifiers corresponding to improper cars are detected in the system 10.
While this alternate embodiment is not necessarily limited to a particular type of data tag and reader, a most preferred embodiment uses radio frequency identification (RFID) tags for the data tags 140 and a corresponding RFID tag reader in the sensing unit 122. Each of the RFID tags 140 would electronically store the identifier and transmit it to the reader 122 when within range. RFID tags have the advantage of not needing to be located on an outer surface of the cars 30, and are thus more impervious to dislodgment or other damage. Most advantageously, the RFID tags 140 are passive, and are thus powered by the signal received from the sensing unit 122 and transmit their identifier in response. Thus, a separate power source for the tags 140 is not necessary and they can remain in place for an extended period without battery replacement or other maintenance. However, active RFID tags could alternately be employed.
The foregoing examples are provided for illustrative and exemplary purposes; the present invention is not necessarily limited thereto. Rather, those skilled in the art will be appreciate that the variation modifications, as well as adaptations for particular circumstances, will fall within the scope of the invention herein shown and described, and of the claims appended hereto.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/858,878, filed on Apr. 8, 2013, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 13/570,982, filed on Aug. 9, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/521,520, filed on Aug. 9, 2011, the contents of which applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8140250 | Mian et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8380361 | Evans | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20070276555 | Kiss | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080068164 | Campbell | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080154451 | Dibble | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080269957 | Rooney et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100283626 | Breed | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110238241 | Brady | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120153089 | Galm | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120303187 | Sexauer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61521520 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13858878 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 14743321 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13570982 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 13858878 | US |