This application claims the benefit under Title 35, United States Code §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/160,038 filed on Mar. 13, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is related to the following commonly-assigned, co-pending applications, each of which is also incorporated herein by reference in its entirety:
1. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/612,807 filed on Nov. 5, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,065,395 issued on Nov. 22, 2011;
2. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/612,818 filed on Nov. 5, 2009;
3. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/612,834 filed on Nov. 5, 2009;
4. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/612,841 filed on Nov. 5, 2009;
5. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/612,882 filed on Nov. 5, 2009;
6. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/612,895 filed on Nov. 5, 2009;
7. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/612,903 filed on Nov. 5, 2009;
8. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/612,925 filed on Nov. 5, 2009;
9. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/613,098 filed on Nov. 5, 2009;
10. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/613,112 filed on Nov. 5, 2009; and
11. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/197,833 filed on Aug. 25, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,036,396 issued on Oct. 11, 2011.
Cloud computing is a type of computing in which dynamically scalable and typically virtualized resources are provided as services via the Internet. As a result, users need not, and typically do not, possess knowledge of, expertise in, or control over the technology and/or infrastructure implemented in the cloud. Cloud computing generally incorporates infrastructure as a service (“IaaS”), platform as a service (“PaaS”), and/or software as a service (“SaaS”). In a typical embodiment, cloud computing services provide common applications online, which applications are accessed using a web browser and the software and data for which are stored on servers comprising the cloud.
Cloud computing customers typically do not own or possess the physical infrastructure that hosts their software platform; rather, the infrastructure is leased in some manner from a third-party provider. Cloud computing customers can avoid capital expenditures by paying a provider for only what they use on a utility, or resources consumed, basis or a subscription, or time-based, basis, for example. Sharing computing power and/or storage capacity among multiple lessees has many advantages, including improved utilization rates and an increase in overall computer usage.
The Internet is rapidly spawning a host of “cloud providers” to provide infrastructure, platforms, and software as a service. Cloud providers such as Amazon.com (AWS), GoGrid, Eucalyptus, etc. are providing a host of new opportunities on the Internet but have not worked together to provide a common management nor execution platform.
One embodiment is a method for facilitating user access of cloud assets. The method comprises authenticating a user to a system comprising a cloud computing environment in which a plurality of cloud assets are hosted; assembling a deployment associated with the authenticated user in accordance with a policy, the deployment comprising designated ones of the cloud assets; and providing a secure mechanism by which the designated ones of the cloud assets comprising the deployment are accessible by the authenticated user.
To better illustrate the advantages and features of the embodiments, a particular description of several embodiments will be provided with reference to the attached drawings. These drawings, and other embodiments described herein, only illustrate selected aspects of the embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope thereof. Further, despite reference to specific features illustrated in the example embodiments, it will nevertheless be understood that these features are not essential to all embodiments and no limitation of the scope thereof is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications in the described embodiments, and any further applications of the principles of the embodiments as described herein are contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art. Furthermore, some items are shown in a simplified form, and inherently include components that are well known in the art. Further still, some items are illustrated as being in direct connection for the sake of simplicity and clarity. Despite the apparent direct connection, it is understood that such illustration does not preclude the existence of intermediate components not otherwise illustrated.
The embodiments described herein provide a mechanism for allowing enterprises to use resources in a safe fashion without know the underlining topology or structure. The embodiments described herein further provide a mechanism to transparently start, route and secure virtual distributions, or deployments, in the public or private cloud as the user requests access. The embodiments described herein further provide a mechanism to transparently start, route and secure virtual distributions, or deployments, in the public or private cloud as the user authenticates to the system. The embodiments described herein further provide a mechanism to provide a personal computing and/or desktop environment running in a public cloud and to securely link the environment to an identity based client for local function. The embodiments described herein further provide a mechanism to provide a personal computing and/or desktop environment running in a private cloud and to securely link the environment to an identity based client for local function.
Enterprises using the cloud are represented by virtualization processes and storage shown as workloads 112. These processes are typically started by an enterprise via a cloud portal or API utilized by administrative personnel or processes running at the enterprise or in the cloud. A typical cloud provider may be using standard ITIL practices and may utilize a configuration management database (“CMDB”) 114, which affects the entire cloud infrastructure and which describes the practice and policies used for instantiating virtualized workloads and storage.
It will be noted that, although the embodiment shown in
The authentication mechanisms employed by the secure bridge 216 have been described in the aforementioned patent application. Additionally, a method and mechanism for applying policy to such identity authentication, as well as to the policies stipulated to be used in creating the authentication of and identity, are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/612,882, which has previously been incorporated by reference. The embodiments described herein provide a fortification channel 217 between the secure bridge 216 and a bridge 218 so that if the cloud assets to be accessed by the user 202 are in a public cloud, such as the cloud 214, the communication channel 217 between the bridges 216, 218, is cryptographically secure.
The embodiments described herein provide for a library of cloud assets, such as virtual machines, such that a request from the user 202 may result in the instantiation of one or more virtual machines 210(1)-210(3). In one embodiment, the virtual machines 210(1)-210(3) may also already be running, in which case the user 202 accesses virtual machines that are already in operation. In another embodiment, there may be some mixture of already running virtual machines and others that need to be instantiated to accomplish the work to be performed.
As disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/612,814, cryptographic mechanisms may be communicated between the bridges 216, 218, such that content stored in the database 212 or the database 206 may be secured from prying eyes and as also disclosed therein, content can be migrated between the databases 206, 212, to effect the best access times according to the workloads that the user 202 is trying to perform. One embodiment also provides for the bridge 218 to apply policy to access requests from either the user 202 or the bridge 216 such that access may be granted or denied based on policy the references in the public cloud 214. Additionally, the bridge 218 may use policy to determine when the unique instantiations of virtual machines, such as the virtual machines 210(1)-210(3), may need to be instantiated and assigned for access to the user 202 despite the fact that instantiations of such virtual machines may already be available. Likewise, policy statements may allow the user 202 to access already instantiated virtual machines in order to collaborate with other users (not shown) that may be communicating with the same instances. One embodiment also provides for either the sharing or full replication or partial replication access to the database 212 as is determined by policy at the bridge 218. The same is true of assets 204(1)-204(3), 206, in the private cloud 208.
One embodiment also provides methods and mechanisms such that once new or shared instantiations of processes or data are provided in the public cloud 214 or private cloud 208 as per policy, the user 202 is granted direct access to those instantiations, either via an IP address or some other access mechanism. As shown in
The embodiments described herein utilize the mechanisms described hereinabove and in the related applications such that once the functions and features described above are performed to either instantiate new or share previous instantiations of virtual workloads in the public or private cloud, the user 202 (
As best illustrated in
In one embodiment, the secure bridge 402 may maintain a relationship with the distributors 404, 406, such that additional resources required for scaling the deployment may be bound to the user 400 and the appropriate security policies put into place to ensure that any new workloads generated for the deployment are also only accessible to the user 400. In one embodiment, the secure bridge 402 handles deployment termination requests received from either the user or one or more deployment components. Termination requests prompt the user 400 to direct the clearing of sensitive information from the deployment according to policy and then to proceed via directing the distributors 404, 406, to close out the deployment, returning the processes 408(1)-408(4) to the available component library maintained by the distributors 404, 406.
In one embodiment, termination of the deployment may also be initiated by the secure bridge 402 in reaction to policy and/or threat intrusion detection as outlined in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/612,903, which has previously been incorporated by reference. In an embodiment, the distributors 404, 406, may utilize mechanisms for handling TesselApps, as described in U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2008/0256535, 2008/0244575, 2008/0307415, and 2008/0256538, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties, for a user environment during the process of deployment creation. In an embodiment, the distributors 404, 406, are used merely for the initiation and termination of the deployment components. Once the deployment is in place and secured, the secure bridge 402 directs access to the deployment via virtual router infrastructure 414.
It will be recognized that various ones of the elements, mechanisms, and/or modules described herein may be implemented using one or more general purpose computers or portions thereof executing software applications designed to perform the functions described or using one or more special purpose computers or portions thereof configured to perform the functions described. The software applications may comprise computer-executable instructions stored on computer-readable media. Additionally, repositories described herein may be implemented using databases or other appropriate storage media.
While the preceding description shows and describes one or more embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. For example, various steps of the described methods may be executed in a different order or executed sequentially, combined, further divided, replaced with alternate steps, or removed entirely. In addition, various functions illustrated in the methods or described elsewhere in the disclosure may be combined to provide additional and/or alternate functions. Therefore, the claims should be interpreted in a broad manner, consistent with the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5428738 | Carter et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5787175 | Carter | Jul 1998 | A |
5870564 | Jensen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878419 | Carter | Mar 1999 | A |
6067572 | Jensen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6108619 | Carter et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119230 | Carter | Sep 2000 | A |
6185612 | Jensen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219652 | Carter et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6275819 | Carter | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6405199 | Carter et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6459809 | Jensen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6601171 | Carter et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6647408 | Ricart et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650777 | Jensen et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6697497 | Jensen et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6738907 | Carter | May 2004 | B1 |
6742035 | Zayas et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6742114 | Carter et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6760843 | Carter | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772214 | McClain et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6826557 | Carter et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6862606 | Major et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6993508 | Major et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7043555 | McClain et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7152031 | Jensen et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7177922 | Carter et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7185047 | Bate et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7197451 | Carter et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7286977 | Carter et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7299493 | Burch et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7316027 | Burch et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7334257 | Ebrahimi et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7356819 | Ricart et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7363577 | Kinser et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376134 | Carter et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7386514 | Major et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389225 | Jensen et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7426516 | Ackerman et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7467415 | Carter | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7475008 | Jensen et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7505972 | Wootton et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7506055 | McClain et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7552468 | Burch et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7562011 | Carter et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7606229 | Foschiano et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
8214653 | Marr et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
20080244575 | Carter et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256535 | Carter et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256538 | Carter et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080307415 | Carter | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110107398 A1 | May 2011 | US |