This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present invention, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Two-stroke (alternatively referred to as two-cycle) engines have been applied in a range of applications. One class of two-stroke engines is the class of engines operating on a normally gaseous hydrocarbon, most commonly natural gas, under lean burn conditions. Such engines are generally large, slow revolutions per minute (RPM) running engines of a stationary design and find application in the driving of rotating and reciprocating equipment, such as compressors and electric generators. The exhaust produced by such engines may result in unwanted noise and include undesirable particles and substances, such as nitrous oxides (NOx). It would be beneficial to reduce the exhaust noise and minimize the exhaust of undesirable particles and substances.
The systems and methods disclosed herein provide for a combination exhaust silencer tuned and controller to improve noise dampening, scavenging, pollutant capture, and engine efficiency.
In one embodiment, a system is provided. The system includes an exhaust system. The exhaust system includes a first and a second conduit configured to receive an exhaust from an engine having at least two cylinders and configured to operate at a range of less than 600 revolutions per minute. The exhaust system further includes a first chamber configured to receive the exhaust from the first and the second conduits, and a second chamber downstream of the first chamber and fluidly coupled to the first chamber by using a third conduit. The exhaust system additionally includes a third chamber downstream of the second chamber and fluidly coupled to the second chamber by using a fourth and a fifth conduit and an exhaust stack downstream of the third chamber and fluidly coupled to the third chamber.
In another embodiment, an exhaust system is provided. The exhaust system includes a compartment and a first and second plate disposed inside the compartment and defining a first, a second, and a third partition of the compartment. The exhaust system further includes a first and a second conduit fluidly coupled to the first partition and configured to receive an exhaust from an engine having at least two cylinders, the engine configured to operate at a range of less than 600 revolutions per minute; wherein the second partition is disposed downstream of the first partition and is fluidly coupled to the first partition by using a third conduit and the third partition is disposed downstream of the second partition and is fluidly coupled to the second partition by using a fourth conduit/ The exhaust system additionally includes an exhaust stack downstream of the third partition and fluidly coupled to the third partition.
In yet another embodiment, a system is provided. The system includes an exhaust system having a first conduit configured to receive an exhaust from a two-stroke engine configured to operate at a range of less than 600 revolutions per minute. The exhaust system further includes a first chamber configured to receive the exhaust from the first conduit and a second chamber downstream of the first chamber and fluidly coupled to the first chamber by using a second conduit. The exhaust system additionally includes a third chamber downstream of the second chamber and fluidly coupled to the second chamber by using a third conduit and an exhaust stack downstream of the third chamber and fluidly coupled to the third chamber.
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. These described embodiments are only exemplary of the present invention. Additionally, in an effort to provide a concise description of these exemplary embodiments, all features of an actual implementation may not be described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skills having the benefit of this disclosure.
Certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention include systems and methods for improving engine operations, particularly 2-stroke natural gas fueled engines. The engine may operate at a slow (revolutions per minute) RPM range, such as between 100-500, 100-750 RPM, 100-1000 RPM, under lean burn conditions and providing power in a range of between 100-400, 100-600, 100-1000 kilowatts (KW). In certain embodiments, a tuned exhaust silencer is provided, suitable for improving air flow while minimizing the exhaust noise and reducing the expelled number of undesired particles and substances, such as nitrous oxides (NOx). Additionally, the tuned exhaust silencer may increase engine efficiency by directing higher pressure exhaust gas in certain ways as detailed below to improve the wave dynamics of the system. The wave dynamics may be timed so as to improve the flow of fresh fuel and air into engine cylinders and to provide for enhanced wave blocking of exhaust port(s), for example, during a compression stroke.
The tuned exhaust described herein may include at least two exhaust ports fluidly coupled to an exhaust shell via exhaust pipes. The exhaust shell may be further divided into two or more shell chambers by using baffle plates and/or perforated pipe. An exhaust stack may include a flow restriction device, such as a butterfly valve, communicatively coupled to a controller suitable for measuring engine operational properties and actuating the restriction device so as to more optimally control exhaust gases leaving the exhaust as well as modifying the wave dynamics of the system. The tuned exhaust further includes certain desired geometries, such as inlet and outlet sizes, diameters, lengths, and locations of exhaust components useful in improving exhaust flow, wave dynamics, and in increasing engine efficiency.
With the foregoing in mind and referring now to
In operation, a piston reciprocates within each cylinder 12 of the stationary engine. As the piston descends within the cylinder moving away from the cylinder head, it opens the inlet port 14, through which a gas or a mixture of gases is admitted and flows into the cylinder 12. At approximately this time, the cylinder 12 is filled with gases which are products of combustion. In certain designs of engine, a mixture of gaseous fuel and air is admitted into the cylinder 12 through the inlet port 14 also at approximately this time. In some designs of the engine system 10, such as Ajax® engines available from Cameron Co., of Houston, Tex., air is admitted to the cylinder 12 through the inlet port 14. At approximately the same time as when the inlet port 14 is open, the descending piston also uncovers the exhaust port 16, through which burnt gases may leave the cylinder 12 via exhaust pipe 22, to form the exhaust gas of the engine. The fluid movement of freshly charged gases entering the cylinder 12 through the inlet port 14 may serve to assist with forcing the burnt gases out of the exhaust port 16, referred to as “scavenging.” The exhaust gases travel through the exhaust pipe 22, into a tuned exhaust inlet 23 of a tuned exhaust 24, through a tuned exhaust inlet pipe 25, through an exhaust outlet 26, and then through the tuned exhaust system 24 and out through an exhaust stack 27. The tuned exhaust system 24 may include vertically or horizontally positionable embodiments. That is the tuned exhaust system 24 may be positioned parallel to the ground (e.g., horizontal positioning) or perpendicular to the ground (e.g., vertical positioning).
Referring now to
As mentioned above, exhaust gases from the cylinders 12 may enter through the inlets 23, traverse the pipes 25 having a length L5, exit through outlets 26 and enter the first chamber 32. The first chamber 32 may not sufficiently dampen noise, spurious pressure excursions, and/or pulsations to the shell 30. Accordingly, the pipes 42 and 44 enable a flow of the exhaust gases into the second chamber 34. The flow pipes 42 and 44 may be positioned such that some particulate and/or fluids may contact the baffle 38 and collect in a lower portion of the chamber 32. The collected particulate and/or fluids may then be removed, for example, by using a drain line. After the exhaust passes through the flow pipes 42 and 44, and a small portion of gas through the baffle 38 and into the second chamber 34, the exhaust gases may then exit the second volume chamber 34 into the third volume chamber 36 through the flow pipes 46 and 48. The exhaust gases may then exit the third volume chamber 36 and out to ambient surroundings via the exhaust stack 27.
In certain embodiments, as described in more detail below with respect to
Turning now to
The modeling (block 54) of the engine 10 may include modeling the number of strokes (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5 strokes), modeling the RPM range (e.g., 100-500, 100-750 RPM, 100-1000 RPM), modeling the fuel type (e.g., diesel, gasoline, natural gas), engine components (e.g., turbochargers, superchargers, transfer ports, reed valves, rotary valves, power valves, crankcases, actuators, valves, intercoolers, manifolds, cylinders, channels, plenums, pipes), parametric design modeling (e.g., bore-stroke ratios, compression ratios, power output/displacement ratios), and/or defining optimization criteria (e.g., mathematical constraints associated with engine component lengths, widths, diameters, geometries).
The modeling (block 56) of the inlets 16 and/or outlets 19 may include modeling one or more diameters D5 of the inlet 23, one or more diameters D7 of the outlet 26, and/or modeling one or more diameter ratios (e.g., D5 to D7 also referred to as inlet to outlet ratio) between the inlet 23 and the outlet 26 of approximately 1 to 1, 1 to 1.25, 1 to 2, 1 to 2.25, 1 to 2.5. The modeling (block 56) may additionally or alternatively include modeling various lengths L5 for the pipe 25, as well as geometry of the pipe 25 (e.g., conical, square, triangular).
The modeling (block 58) of the multiple compartments 30, 32, 34, and 36 may include modeling compartment sizes (e.g., lengths L1, L2, L3, L4, diameter D6) to derive the tuned exhaust 24 suitable for minimizing noise and substantially reducing undesired emissions (e.g., NOx, sulfur). Thicknesses for walls of the compartments 30, 32, 34, and 36 may also be modeled. Likewise, placement and thickness (e.g., W1, W2) of the baffle plates 38 and 40 inside of compartment 30 may be modeled. Material types (e.g., steel, chromoly, inconel, titanium, aluminum, ceramics) may also be modeled to determine lifecycle for the tuned exhaust 24 as well as to determine material combinations that may improve noise reduction, reduce particulate emissions, and increase the life for the tuned exhaust 24.
The modeling (block 60) of the multiple intercompartment conduits (e.g., conduits 42, 44, 46, 48) may include modeling lengths L7 and L8, as well as diameters D1, D2, D3, and D4 to derive desired wave dynamics and reduction of acoustic noise and vibration for the tuned exhaust 24. Indeed, the process 52 may additionally use wave dynamic modeling in blocks 54, 56, 58, 60, 62 and 64 to derive an acoustically tuned exhaust 24 that may enable improved scavenging, noise reduction, and capture of certain undesired emissions. The geometries (e.g., cylindrical, conical, triangular, square) of the conduits 42, 44, 46, 48, the placement in the compartment 30 of each of the conduits 42, 44, 46, 48, as well as the materials used, may be modeled (block 60). Additionally, the number of conduits (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, or more) placed inside of the compartment 30 may be derived. Similarly, the location of the conduits 42, 44, 46, 48 with respect to the baffles 38 and 40 may be modeled.
The modeling (block 62) of the stack 27 may include modeling the lengths L9 and L10, and the diameter D8 so as to increase noise reduction and improve the flow of exhaust to the atmosphere. The modeling (block 62) may additionally include modeling features of the stack 27, such as geometric shape (cylindrical, conical, square, triangular), and/or materials used (e.g., steel, chromoly, inconel, aluminum, ceramics) to construct the stack 27. Additionally, placement and use of any catalytic structures in the chambers 30, 32, 34, 36, conduits 42, 44, 46, 48, and/or stack 27, may be modeled by the process 52.
The models may be simulated (block 64) to derive wave dynamics, scavenging behavior, thermodynamic behavior, acoustic behavior, particulate counts and capture of particulates, fluid flows, or a combination thereof, of the engine 10 and the tuned exhaust 24. Accordingly, if the process 52 determines (decision 66) that the models achieved a desired performance, such as a desired flow of exhaust fluids, scavenging, engine 10 efficiency, engine 10 and exhaust 24, thermodynamics, engine 10 fuel usage, noise, particulate emission counts, or a combination thereof, then the process 52 may use the models (block 68) to derive the tuned exhaust 24 having the desired features, as described in more detail below with respect to
Each of the two-depicted pipes 25 may be disposed at an angle alpha (α) of approximately 45 degrees±15 degrees with respect to side walls of the chamber 32. Once inside of the chamber of shell 30, the exhaust may produce certain wave dynamics, as modeled above with respect t
The length L2 of the chamber 32 maybe of approximately 35 inches±10 inches, and the length L6 may be of approximately 48 inches±12 inches. Some of the exhaust gas may traverse the conduct 42 into the chamber 34 having the length L3 of approximately 17 inches±10 inches. The exhaust gas may then traverse the conduits 46 and 48 having the length L8 of approximately 38 inches±12 inches. As depicted the baffle plates 40 may be positioned so as to aid in securing the conduits 46 and 48 to the shell 30. The positioning of the baffle plates may result in a width W4 of approximately 25 inches±10 inches. The diameter D3 and D4 of the conduits 46 and 48 respectively, may be of approximately 12 inches±5 inches ID. Likewise, the diameter D1 of the conduit 42 may be of approximately 12 inches±5 inches ID. In the depicted embodiment, the conduits 42, 46, and 48 may be constructed out of perforated pipe having walls with a thickness of approximately 0.25 inches±0.5 inches. The exhaust gases may then proceed from the chamber 36 having the length L4 of approximately 5 inches±2 inches into the exhaust stack 27. The exhaust stack 27 may include the length L10 of approximately 42 inches±12 inches and may be disposed inside of the shell 30 at a length L9 of approximately 13 inches±10 inches. The exhaust gases may then exit the stack 27 into the atmosphere. By providing for the tuned exhaust 24 having the depicted lengths diameters and geometries, the system and methods described herein may provide for a more efficient exhaust of fluid (e.g. gases) exiting the engine system 10, minimize noise, and increase scavenging and subsequent engine 10 efficiency.
Turning now to
In the depicted embodiment, the pipes 22 are disposed at an angle β of approximately between 15° and 60° with respect to the axis 85. Additionally, the pipes 25 and the coupler 70 may be disposed at an angle Δ. The components of the tuned exhaust system 24 may be manufactured of steel, stainless steel, chromoly, titanium, aluminum, inconel, ceramics, and the like, suitable for exposure to hot gases. The components may be molded, machined, milled, or otherwise formed into the desired geometries described. By using the various components and geometries illustrated in
In the depicted embodiment, the process 90 may retrieve (block 92) sensor 49 data. As mentioned above with respect to
The process 90 may use the sensor data to derive (block 94) engine 10 and/or exhaust system 24 parameters. For example, physics based models (e.g., thermodynamic models, wave dynamic models, computer fluid dynamic models, finite element analysis models), statistical models, and/or heuristic models (e.g., artificial intelligence models, neural network models, genetic algorithm models) may be used to derive current charging efficiency, scavenging efficiency, trapping efficiency, air to fuel ratios, and/or average trapped equivalence ratio. The process 90 may then derive (block 96) valve adjustments that may result in certain targets, such as targeted charging efficiency, scavenging efficiency, trapping efficiency, air to fuel ratios, and/or average trapped equivalence ratio. The process 90 may then transmit (block 98) valve adjustment signals to modulate or otherwise change valve positions. The process 90 may be cyclical and then iterate to block 92. By sensing (block 92) system 10 and 24 data, deriving (block 94) certain parameters, deriving (block 96) adjustments, and transmitting (block 98) adjustments to the valves 47, 51, and/or 53, the exhaust system 24 may be tuned dynamically based on sensed conditions, thus improving engine 10 efficiency.
While the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown in the accompanying figures and described above, it is not intended that these be taken to limit the scope of the present invention and modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2196920 | Hoyle | Apr 1940 | A |
2241010 | Chipley | May 1941 | A |
2287412 | Bourne | Jun 1942 | A |
2326613 | Bourne et al. | Aug 1943 | A |
2353036 | Hoyle | Jul 1944 | A |
2513229 | Bourne et al. | Jun 1950 | A |
2829729 | Bourne et al. | Apr 1958 | A |
3276202 | Wright | Oct 1966 | A |
3462947 | Nowak | Aug 1969 | A |
3476524 | Burke | Nov 1969 | A |
3647394 | Wetch et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3687225 | Nelson | Aug 1972 | A |
3760900 | Overcast | Sep 1973 | A |
3775064 | Berger et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3853201 | Smale | Dec 1974 | A |
3853484 | Sudar et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4011922 | Goplen | Mar 1977 | A |
4037407 | Mizuno et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4064962 | Hunt | Dec 1977 | A |
4064963 | Kaan et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4162904 | Clay et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4177875 | Kurobe et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4203502 | Strader | May 1980 | A |
4203503 | Franco et al. | May 1980 | A |
4332307 | Ito | Jun 1982 | A |
4382487 | Baumann | May 1983 | A |
4426844 | Nakano | Jan 1984 | A |
4487288 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4851015 | Wagner et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4867270 | Wissmann et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4916897 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4949807 | Hirata et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5016438 | Harris | May 1991 | A |
5052178 | Clerc et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5168132 | Beidl et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5212948 | Gillingham et al. | May 1993 | A |
5248859 | Borla | Sep 1993 | A |
5338903 | Winberg | Aug 1994 | A |
5435347 | Gillingham | Jul 1995 | A |
5612006 | Fisk | Mar 1997 | A |
5738184 | Masuda et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5808245 | Wiese et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809776 | Holtemann et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5857324 | Scappatura et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866859 | Karlsson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5902971 | Sato et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907135 | Hayakawa et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916128 | Garr et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921079 | Harris | Jul 1999 | A |
6109026 | Karlsson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6233926 | Bailey et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6277784 | Kruse | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6315076 | Bruck et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6357227 | Neufert | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6403039 | Bruck | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6588203 | Hirota et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6622482 | Knight et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6722124 | Pawson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6789385 | Glover | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6821932 | Guinther et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823660 | Minami | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6874316 | Nakatani | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6892853 | Cai et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912843 | Hufendiek et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918463 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6935105 | Page et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6935285 | Yuasa et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6938729 | Worner et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7104359 | Zelinski | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7281606 | Marocco | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7350349 | Olofsson | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7428947 | Nohl et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7464543 | Chrisman et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7690194 | Chrisman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7713493 | Bosanec, Jr. et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7765799 | Chrisman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7818963 | Chrisman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7980070 | Mashiko et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8069660 | Cone et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8468813 | Hill et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8646260 | Chrisman et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20040245044 | Cerrato-Jay et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070245713 | Chrisman et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080053078 | Chrisman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080072579 | Chrisman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20140208723 | Baig et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
52018520 | Feb 1977 | JP |
409158722 | Jun 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150275721 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |