The present disclosure is generally related to a system and method for use of acoustic reflectometry information in ventilation devices.
When a hospital patient is unable to breathe on his own, the patient is connected to a mechanical ventilation device. The patient is first intubated, a procedure in which an endotracheal tube (also called an artificial airway, endotracheal tube, or ETT), is inserted through the nose or mouth into the trachea (wind pipe). The tube is then connected to a mechanical ventilation device, which forces air into the lungs.
Each year, approximately 60 million intubations requiring endotracheal tubes are performed worldwide. Assuring proper placement of the endotracheal tube within the trachea and assuring that it has not moved or become obstructed are significant clinical problems. Failure to correct a misplaced or clogged endotracheal tube can lead to serious complications to the patient, most notably conditions consistent with lack of oxygen such as brain damage or death.
Complications with endotracheal tubes include:
There are known in the art devices that provide direct, precise, real-time monitoring of endotracheal tube (ETT) position and obstructions. Systems and methods for doing this are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,445,144 and 6,705,319 to Wodicka et al. One such commercially available system is the SonarMed® AirWave™ system (available from SonarMed, Inc., 5513 W. 74th Street, Indianapolis, Ind. 46268). Such prior art devices and methodologies are collectively referred to herein as an “acoustic reflectometry system.” The acoustic reflectometry system couples in-line between the ETT and the ventilator hose.
The acoustic reflectometry system's sound waves monitor the artificial airway, alerting clinicians in real time of situations that may lead to unplanned extubations, ETT obstructions, endobronchial intubation, or esophageal intubation. Using principles similar to sonar, the acoustic reflectometry system sends a sound signal into the ETT and records the returning echoes that arise from within the tube and patient airways. The timing and amplitude of these echoes are analyzed by the system to non-invasively measure:
Clinicians may use this information to assist with placing the ETT properly and to receive early warnings about tube movement and obstruction development so they may take corrective action to prevent patient harm.
An acoustic reflectometry system consists of an adapter connected to the proximal end of an ETT and to a monitor. Embedded inside the adapter is a sound generator such as a miniature speaker, for example, and at least one receiver such as a microphone array, for example. With these components, the system employs acoustic reflectometry by emitting sound waves from the speaker into an intubated ETT, detecting the returning acoustic reflections, or echoes, with the microphones, and then examining the echo timings and amplitudes to infer characteristics of the ETT and airway. The system's algorithms analyze the echo signal and provide information about the size of the passageway around the ETT tip, location and size of ETT obstructions, and relative movement of the ETT tip within the trachea.
The microphone array allows the system to determine the direction from which echoes arrive. As a result, the system can selectively filter all echoes that arise from devices on the ventilator side of the adapter, such as closed circuit suction catheters, Y-connectors, ETCO2 sensors, and filters, for example. This selective filtering allows the system to obtain an echo waveform from the ETT and airways that is free of ventilator circuit echoes.
The human airways are a network of bifurcating branches starting at the trachea and ending at the alveoli—the small sacs where the oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange takes place. An interesting property of the airways is that even though the cross sectional area of each individual segment decreases as the branching depth increases, the total cross sectional area (arrived at by adding up the cross sectional areas of all parallel segments) undergoes a rapid increase after several generations of airway branching. In other words, the airways behave acoustically like a horn with a bell at the end, and sound waves traveling down the airways will be reflected at the bell. The negative pressure wave from this bell-shaped region is used by the system as a reference to which changes in ETT tip position are tracked. The bell begins around the 6th branching generation (approximately 5 cm past the carina in adults).
There is no echo from the carina that can be tracked. Unfortunately, since the additive cross sectional area of the two main stem bronchi is approximately equal to the trachea's cross sectional area, there are no echoes of significance that arise from the carina.
While a majority of medical devices that use acoustics operate in the ultrasonic frequency range, the acoustic reflectometry system operates in an audible range below 8 kHz because of the frequencies at which tubes behave as waveguides. Since the sounds typically found in the ventilator circuit—such as respiratory sounds, secretion sounds, or cuff leak sounds—can potentially interfere with the echo signals used by the system, a series of advanced data collection algorithms are used to obtain a clean echo signal during ventilation.
When connected to a patient, the acoustic reflectometry system collects a majority of its measurements during the quiet period of ventilation between end expiration and inspiration. As a result, the acoustic reflectometry system monitor provides updates to the ETT status approximately every patient breath, depending on the level of noise present between breaths. For cases where excessive noise interferes with acoustical measurements such that the ETT status is not updating, the acoustic reflectometry system gives the clinician the option to listen directly to the adapter microphones via the monitor speaker. This assists the clinician in determining the interfering noise source so they can rectify it if possible. Examples of interfering noise sources may include: a leaky ETT cuff, secretions in the airway and/or ETT, a high respiratory rate, a nebulizer, or patient coughing.
A shortcoming of the prior art ventilation device described above is that the ventilation device does not have specific information pertaining to the condition and location of the ETT in the patient. Consequently, if the ventilation device had access to acoustic reflectometry information, the performance of the ventilation device could be improved.
However, in view of the prior art at the time the present invention was made, it was not obvious to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art how the identified needs could be fulfilled.
A system and method for use of acoustic reflectometry information in ventilation devices is disclosed. The system and method of the present disclosure includes information about the artificial airway that can be used by other medical devices monitoring the patient or patient airways to enhance the device's performance and the patient's quality of care. These enhancements include improving ventilation modes that automatically compensate for ETTs by using obstruction information to estimate breath by breath ETT resistance, providing additional insights to the clinician regarding patient work of breathing which may lead to improved outcomes of weaning the patient from the ventilator, improving treatment efficacy by making alarms more specific and directing the clinician to the most likely source causing the alarm, trending ETT position and patency information in concert with ventilation trended variables to make it easier to determine correlations between artificial airway issues and the patient airway status, improving secretion management by using trend of estimated ETT resistance to determine if suctioning is recommended and comparing estimated ETT resistance pre- and post-suctioning to determine efficacy of suctioning; and reducing nuisance alarms by detecting patient events such as coughing and directing the ventilator to ignore the event instead of issuing a high pressure alarm.
In a particular illustrative embodiment, the system includes a sound generator to emit sound waves into the ETT and at least one receiver to detect returning acoustic reflections. The system also includes a reflectometry device having at least one processor and a memory that is accessible to the processor for analyzing timings and amplitudes of the returning acoustic reflections to determine a size of a passageway around an ETT tip, location and size of ETT obstructions, and relative movement of the ETT tip within a trachea. In addition, a ventilation device is in communication with the reflectometry device.
Additional objects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment exemplifying the best mode of carrying out the teachings of the present disclosure as presently perceived.
For purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the method and system, reference will now be made to the embodiment illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used to describe that embodiment. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the method and system is intended. Alterations and modifications, and further applications of the principles of the method and system as illustrated therein, as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the method and system relates are contemplated, are desired to be protected. Such alternative embodiments require certain adaptations to the embodiments discussed herein that would be obvious to those skilled in the art.
Referring now to the drawings,
As shown in
Referring now to
To illustrate the relationships between cross sectional area, amplitude, and time delay,
The first echo is a positive deflection (positive pressure) indicating a cross sectional area decrease. This corresponds to the decrease in the nozzle's diameter from 9 mm to 8 mm. The second echo is a positive deflection immediately followed by a negative deflection, indicating a cross sectional area decrease and then an increase. This echo could be from a small obstruction in the ETT, from a kink in the ETT, or from a patient biting on the ETT. If the echo amplitude were larger, this would correspond to a larger obstruction. The acoustic reflectometry system estimates the obstruction size from the echo amplitude and the obstruction location from the echo delay time.
The third echo is a negative deflection indicating a cross sectional area increase. This echo, referred to as the ETT tip echo, is analyzed by the acoustic reflectometry system to estimate the passageway size (or effective diameter) around the ETT. A negative deflection echo indicates that the ETT is located in a passageway that has a larger cross sectional area than the ETT. This would be the case for an ETT that is in the trachea. If this echo were to change to a positive deflection, it would indicate that the ETT is located in a passageway that has a smaller cross sectional area than the ETT. This may correspond to an ETT that is in the esophagus or bronchus or that it is clogged at the tip, for example, from mucus.
The last echo, referred to as the airway echo, arises from the bell shaped region in the lower airways. The acoustic reflectometry system tracks the time delay of this airway echo, estimating relative changes in the distance between the ETT tip and the airway echo region. For example, if the time delay between the ETT tip echo and the airway echo is decreasing (airway echo moving to the left), then this indicates that the ETT tip is getting closer to the airway echo region or that the ETT is migrating down the trachea.
Referring now to
Many improvements may be made in the operation of ventilators and other devices by obtaining information that may be gleaned from airway monitoring devices such as the acoustic reflectometry system disclosed herein and using this data and new algorithm to improve prior art ventilator functionality as described below.
Improvement in the Calculation of PTRACHEA (Pressure within Trachea)
The pressure within the trachea can be calculated by a ventilator as follows:
PTRACHEA=PAW−ΔPTUBE
ΔPTUBE=RTUBE×Flow
where PTRACHEA=estimated tracheal pressure,
PAW=measured mean pressure at the Y-piece,
ΔPTUBE=estimated pressure drop across ETT,
RTUBE=estimated ETT resistance (pressure differential across tube),
Flow=measured airway flow.
As explained above, in the prior art the calculation of RTUBE is a function of ETT diameter (dETT) and length (l). The prior art calculation of the estimated ETT resistance assumes an ideal tube for the ETT. However, in reality there are often obstructions within the ETT that can present a significant obstacle to the flow of air through the tube. The estimated ETT resistance may therefore be improved by using ETT monitoring data that can detect obstructions within the ETT, thereby allowing the calculation of RTUBE as a function RTUBE(dETT; 1, Pct1, Pct2), which additionally takes into account percent of ETT obstruction 1 and 2 (Pct1 and Pct2, the two largest obstructions within the ETT). The figures for percent of ETT obstruction 1 and 2 (Pct1 and Pct2) comprise an estimate of what percent of the total ETT tube diameter is obstructed by each obstruction. Those skilled in the art will recognize that fewer or more than two tube obstructions may be taken into account. In fact, the acoustic reflectometry system can detect the whole obstruction profile within the ETT from the proximal end to the distal end and an effective tube diameter can be calculated based upon this data. The more accurate tube diameter measurement will allow for a more accurate estimate of the ETT tube resistance, and hence a more accurate estimate of PTRACHEA.
Improvement to Automatic Tube Compensation
Work of breathing (WOB) is a measure of how much work an intubated patient has to do to inhale and exhale, and is used to determine if a patient will be able to breathe on their own if the ventilator is removed. An increase in RTUBE (tube resistance or the pressure across the tube) increases WOB. Automatic Tube Compensation (ATC) or Automatic Airway Compensation (AAC) is a technique used on the Draeger® Evita® (available from Draeger Medical, Inc., 3135 Quarry Road, Telford, Pa. 18969), Mallinckrodt® 840 (available from Covidien, 15 Hampshire Street, Mansfield, Mass. 02048), and Viasys® Avea® (available from CareFusion Corporation, 3750 Torrey View Court, San Diego, Calif. 92130) ventilators, which overcome the imposed work due to the ETT automatically, based on the known resistive characteristics of the ETT and the measured inspiratory flow. This technique is similar to the resistive component of proportional assist ventilation (PAV). ATC has been shown to reduce the imposed work of breathing due to the artificial airway more reliably than pressure support ventilation.
For ATC, the patient is spontaneously breathing and, depending on the flow volume, the ventilator calculates the pressure in the trachea and then assists the patient by setting the pressure at the proximal end of the ETT so that the calculated pressure in the trachea (i.e., after the pressure drop caused by the ETT) is at the pressure that would be present during normal breathing without an ETT. Therefore, when the patient tries to spontaneously breathe, the ventilator senses a pressure drop and then increases the pressure at the proximal end of the ETT to compensate for the pressure drop. Setting “% tube compensation” on the ventilator to zero results in no compensation. Setting the “% tube compensation” to 100 provides full compensation for the ETT.
A typical operating sequence for initiating ATC is as follows:
1. The ventilator uses known constants for RTUBE for different size endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes stored in a look-up table.
2. The operator inputs the tube size and % tube compensation desired. The ventilator uses the mathematical model to simulate tracheal pressure control.
3. The ventilator also displays the calculated tracheal pressure.
4. The equation for tube compensation is PTRACHEA=PAW−RTUBE×Flow, where PTRACHEA=tracheal pressure, PAW=mean pressure at the Y-piece, RTUBE=tube coefficient, Flow=airway flow.
This prior art technique suffers from the following pitfalls:
1. Airway secretions or position changes may result in under compensation, since the calculated PTRACHEA has not taken these factors into account.
2. In vivo resistance is greater than ex vivo resistance.
3. Following extubation, upper airway changes may affect work of breathing unanticipated by tube compensation.
As described hereinabove, the obstruction information available from the acoustic reflectometry system may be used to improve the PTRACHEA estimate.
Improvements to Pressure Support Ventilation
Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a ventilator mode that allows the user to select an elevated pressure during spontaneous inspiration to support breathing by overcoming the pressure drop across the ETT. This is somewhat similar to ATC, but instead the operator selects a constant pressure for support instead of the ventilator automatically calculating the pressure based on flow volume. Therefore, when selecting this mode, the user can use the real-time PTRACHEA calculated as described hereinabove as direct feedback to determine the appropriate pressure assist level. For example, while observing the real-time trachea pressure waveform, the user can adjust the pressure support level to obtain a trachea pressure that is above, at, or below a desired baseline pressure, depending on the amount of work the caregiver determines is appropriate as the patient progresses through the ETT weaning process.
Improvements to Adaptive Ventilation Modes
The process of gas delivery to the patient depends on the mode of ventilation (see below). Typically a breath can be classified as either volume controlled or pressure controlled, depending on which variable the ventilator actively controls during ventilation.
Exhalation in mechanical ventilation is almost always completely passive. The ventilator's expiratory valve is opened, and expiratory flow is allowed until the baseline pressure (positive end-expiratory pressure, or PEEP) is reached. Expiratory flow is determined by patient factors such as compliance and resistance.
In Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV), Inspiratory Pressure is the pressure above PEEP to be applied in the next breath. This pressure is measured at the proximal end of the ETT. Inspiratory pressure is adapted, breath by breath, to gently drive the tidal volume towards the Vt target.
ASV delivers the optimal tidal volume using the lowest pressures possible using the following steps:
1. Assess breath by breath the patient's lung mechanics.
2. Optimize breath by breath the tidal volume/respiratory frequency combination based on lung mechanics.
3. Achieve optimum tidal volume/respiratory frequency by automatically adjusting mandatory rate and inspiratory pressure.
By using the much more accurate RTUBE resistance information that is made possible by the acoustic reflectometry system as discussed above, the much more accurate breath by breath estimation of ETT resistance can be used to help improve the estimate of patient lung mechanics (by better characterizing the contributions of the ETT to the overall mechanics). The RTUBE resistance information from the acoustic reflectometry system may therefore advantageously be made available to the ventilator controller that is assessing the patient's lung mechanics and adjusting the ventilator's mandatory rate and inspiratory pressure in order to improve optimization of tidal volume and respiratory frequency.
Use of PTRACHEA to Inform Selection of Ventilation Settings
As discussed above, pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a ventilator mode which allows the user to select an elevated pressure during spontaneous inspiration to support breathing by overcoming the pressure drop across the ETT. This is somewhat similar to ATC, but instead the operator selects a constant pressure for support instead of the ventilator automatically calculating the pressure based upon flow volume. Therefore, when selecting PSV, the user can use the real-time trachea pressure (PTRACHEA) as direct feedback to determine the appropriate pressure assist level. For example, while observing the real-time trachea pressure waveform, the user can adjust the pressure support level setting on the ventilator to obtain a trachea pressure that is above, at, or below a desired baseline pressure, depending on the amount of work the caregiver determines is appropriate as the patient progresses through the ventilator weaning process. Alternatively, the user may set the desired trachea pressure (above, at, or below a desired baseline pressure), and the ventilator controller, which is provided access to the PTRACHEA data from the acoustic reflectometry system, may automatically adjust the pressure support level setting on the ventilator to obtain the desired trachea pressure.
Assessing a Patient's Readiness for Weaning
In the prior art, the determination of a patient's readiness for weaning off of a ventilator is assessed by a number of methods, one of which consists of reducing ventilator support to the level that it only overcomes the WOB intrinsic to the artificial airway. If, for an extended period of time prior to extubation, the patient is able to sustain the effort necessary for full spontaneous breathing while the ventilator support level is only overcoming the WOB caused by the artificial airway, extubation is indicated.
Use of measurements from the acoustic reflectometry system in conjunction with the support modes available in ventilators, can significantly increase the validity of the “extubation simulation” (or “electronic extubation”) to more accurately reflect a patient's long-term ability to breathe without the help from a ventilator, and make this type of weaning trial a more integral part of the natural progression of a treatment protocol. During electronic extubation, the pressure at the top of the ETT is set so that the pressure at the bottom of the ETT is the pressure that the patient would experience if they were breathing on their own (i.e., the ventilation is compensating only for the effect of the ETT, hence the ETT is said to have been electronically extubated). One embodiment, two sets of WOB parameters are displayed on the ventilator, one that depicts the actual WOB share of the patient versus the ventilator, and one that gives the same parameters under “free airway” conditions as calculated from the continuous information of tube resistance (RTUBE) that is available from the acoustic reflectometry system.
Ability to Suggest Cause of High Pressure Alarm
During a high pressure alarm issued by the ventilator, it is possible to provide more specific alarm language to the user based upon information that can be supplied to the ventilator controller from the acoustic reflectometry system. The data received from the acoustic reflectometry system can then be used to diagnose the cause of the high pressure condition, giving the user insight into how to correct the problem that is causing the alarm. Examples of high pressure alarm information that can be transmitted to the user based upon information made available by the acoustic reflectometry system include:
1. Partial obstruction detected in ETT;
2. ETT tip partially occluded; and
3. Possible mainstem bronchial intubation (indicated by the size of the passageway detected around the ETT tip).
Ability to Suggest Cause of Low Volume Alarm
During a low volume alarm issued by the ventilator, it is possible to provide more specific alarm language to the user based upon information that can be supplied to the ventilator controller from the acoustic reflectometry system. The data received from the acoustic reflectometry system can then be used to diagnose the cause of the low volume condition, giving the user insight into how to correct the problem that is causing the alarm. Examples of low volume alarm information that can be transmitted to the user based upon information made available by the acoustic reflectometry system include:
1. Possible mainstem bronchial intubation (indicated by the size of the passageway detected distal of the ETT tip);
2. Possible collapsed lung (indicated by a significant change in the airway sonic reflection morphology, which is a composite of the reflection coming from both the left and right lungs—change one lung volume and the composite signal will change significantly);
3. Possible bronchial plug (indicated by a significant change in the airway sonic reflection morphology, which is a composite of the reflection coming from both the left and right lungs—a plugged bronchus of one lung will significantly change the composite signal).
Integration of Acoustic Reflectometry System Data into Hierarchy of Ventilator Alarms
Ventilator alarms are calling for intervention when a physical condition has been recognized that directly threatens the well-being of a patient. However, in the way alarms and their hierarchies are implemented in ventilators in the prior art, they are also used to improve treatment efficacy by directing the clinician to the most likely source causing the alarm. Using data available from the acoustic reflectometry system, an airway resistance threshold alarm may be created that will be activated before any high pressure alarms would be triggered, effectively giving the clinician an opportunity to solve the problem before a high pressure condition occurs.
Integration of Acoustic Reflectometer into Ventilator/Hose
An acoustic reflectometer as referenced herein may be integrated into the ventilator at the hose connection or in the hose itself. This acoustic reflectometer may be used to detect hose faults and other conditions:
1. Location and severity of hose kinking;
2. Location and severity of hose occlusion due to rainout (the pooling of condensation in a low point of the hose);
3. Hose partial or full disconnection location; or
4. Detect presence/absence of airway circuit devices (filters, etc).
It will be appreciated in view of the present disclosure that the acoustic reflectometer that is integrated into the ventilator at the hose connection or in the hose itself may be in addition to, or as a replacement for, the acoustic reflectometer located near the proximal end of the ETT.
Providing Insights into Ventilator Trending Parameters
Ventilators report trends of different parameters such as peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), airway compliance, respiratory rate (RR), etc. When these values change over time, it is not always clear if the change is related to the patient's condition, factors associated with the artificial airway, or both.
Providing the ability to view ventilation trended variables in concert with the information from the acoustic reflectometry system (including the real-time RTUBE and PTRACHEA calculated as described hereinabove) provides the clinician with a new means to observe correlations between artificial airway issues and changing trending parameters. This information can help the clinician to better understand some of the subtle changes present with auto modes and compensation modes as they relate to changes in patient and artificial airway status.
One example of providing insights into ventilator trending parameters is using trended information from the acoustic reflectometry system to understand why peak pressure has increased over time during volume ventilation. Increased peak pressure can be caused by a number of very different conditions, each of which results in a different response by the clinician. If the increase is due to an increased ETT resistance, then the response would be to remove the constriction from the ETT. If the increase is due to endobronchial intubation, then the response would be to reposition the ETT tip above the carina. If the increase is due to a mechanical change in the patient airways (such as bronchoconstriction) then the response would be to administer a bronchodilator. All of these conditions can be inferred from trends of RTUBE, PTRACHEA, ETT tip position, and passageway size around ETT tip, in conjunction with the peak pressure. If the increased peak pressure is accompanied by an increased RTUBE or a lack of increased PTRACHEA then it could be inferred that an increased ETT resistance (e.g. mucus obstruction, tube kinking, or patient biting) and not mechanical changes in the patient airways may be contributing to the increased peak pressure. Alternatively, if the increased peak pressure is accompanied by both an ETT tip position that is very low in the trachea and a decreased passageway size around the ETT tip, then it could be inferred that endobronchial intubation and not mechanical changes in the patient airways may be contributing to the increased peak pressure. If the increased peak pressure does not correlate to any of the trended information available from the acoustic reflectometry system, then it could be inferred that mechanical changes in the patient airways may be contributing to the increased peak pressures.
Another example of providing insights into ventilator trending parameters is using trended information from the acoustic reflectometry system to understand why tidal volume has decreased over time during pressure ventilation. As with increased peak pressures during volume ventilation, decreased tidal volume can be caused by a number of very different conditions, each of which results in a different response by the clinician. If the decrease is due to an increased ETT resistance, then the response would be to remove the constriction from the ETT. If the decrease is due to endobronchial intubation, then the response would be to reposition the ETT tip above the carina. If the decrease is due to a mechanical change in the patient airways (such as bronchoconstriction) then the response would be to administer a bronchodilator. As was discussed above, all of these conditions can be inferred from trends of RTUBE, PTRACHEA, ETT tip position, and passageway size around ETT tip, in conjunction with the tidal volume.
Secretion Management
A recommendation for suctioning the ETT can be generated based upon the value, and optionally the trend, of the artificial airway resistance as measured by the acoustic reflectometry system.
Furthermore, ventilators typically have a specific “mode” that can be invoked for suctioning (e.g., for performing pre-oxygenation, post-oxygenation, etc). Pre-suctioning and post-suctioning measurements for tube resistance may be analyzed and used as a basis for a message that indicates that the suctioning effort was successful or not completely successful. This, in turn, could alert the caregiver to dried secretions that are not removed by regular suctioning and might be an indication for ETT replacement, increased humidification, or other interventions such as use of a “tube rescue” device which removes mucus debris from walls of the ETT lumen. Examples of tube rescue devices include CAM Rescue Cath (available from Omneotech, 92300 Overseas Highway, Suite 208, Tavernier, Fla. 33070) and endOclear (available from Endoclear, LLC, 2390 Mitchell Park Drive B, Petoskey, Mich. 49770).
Cough Detection to Reduce Nuisance Alarms
Patient coughs are significant as they relate to both high pressure alarms and secretion management. The microphones in the acoustic reflectometry system can be used to detect a patient cough event, and this information can be supplied to the ventilator to discriminate for those events. For example, this can be embodied as a “count but ignore cough events” option in the ventilator alarm settings, with the benefit of reducing nuisance alarms.
Cough Detection for Secretion Management
When a cough is detected by the acoustic reflectometry system, a comparison may be made of the ETT condition before and after each cough event in order to assess the effectiveness of the cough as a means for moving secretions (based on the migration of the location of measured ETT obstructions before and after the cough).
Integration of the Acoustic Reflectometry System into Other Airway Devices
Integration of acoustic reflectometry system information into a medical device is not limited to only ventilators. For example, heated humidifiers can benefit from acoustic reflectometry system information. Issues involving humidifiers are mostly related to rainout, insufficient humidification leading to dried secretions, and general hygiene. The acoustic reflectometry system information relating to the size and location of obstructions offers manufacturers of humidifiers a means to detect specific humidifier-related issues and either direct the clinician to the problem or automatically make device setting adjustments to attempt to address the problem.
Although the teachings of the present disclosure have been described in detail with reference to certain embodiments, variations and modifications exist within the scope and spirit of these teaching as described and defined in the following claims:
This application is a Division of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/853,252, filed Mar. 29, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,707,363, issued Jul. 18, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/617,249, filed Mar. 29, 2012, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2209944 | Walker | Jul 1940 | A |
4344436 | Kubota | Aug 1982 | A |
4501273 | McGinnis | Feb 1985 | A |
4630606 | Weerda et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4697593 | Evans et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4700396 | Bolin | Oct 1987 | A |
5445144 | Wodicka et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5575310 | Kamen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5655518 | Burden | Aug 1997 | A |
5666960 | Fredberg et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5823965 | Rasmussen | Oct 1998 | A |
5853005 | Scanlon | Dec 1998 | A |
6257234 | Sun | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6390091 | Banner et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6443907 | Mansy et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6629527 | Estes et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6705319 | Wodicka | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7691070 | Comanducci | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7891354 | Farbarik | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8038629 | Solanki et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8152751 | Roger et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8280489 | Li et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8371303 | Schaner et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8394031 | Mansy et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8424529 | Efrati et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8522787 | Lin et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8608658 | Burbank et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611984 | Greenburg et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8764725 | Averbuch | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8844534 | Behlmaier | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8905029 | Colburn | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9364180 | Armitstead | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9498590 | Mansfield et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9707363 | Mansfield et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
20010004893 | Biondi et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020016610 | Hovanes et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020053345 | Jafari | May 2002 | A1 |
20020104537 | Banner | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030034035 | Raphael | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050005935 | Gradon | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060070623 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060070624 | Kane et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060081255 | Miller et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060107962 | Ward et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070137652 | Qureshi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070257788 | Carlson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080078248 | Farbarik | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080078390 | Milne et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090025728 | Aljuri et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090082676 | Bennison | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099479 | Solanki et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120439 | Goebel | May 2009 | A1 |
20090187164 | Rowe | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090229605 | Efrati et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090229611 | Martin et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090301601 | Enerson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318805 | Raphael | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100252048 | Young et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100261996 | Li et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110030694 | Schaner et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110087123 | Choncholas | Apr 2011 | A9 |
20110154241 | Skidmore et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110197885 | Wondka et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197888 | Deutsch | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110313689 | Holley | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120132211 | Halperin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120232411 | Brunner et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130098363 | Forte et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130228171 | Mansfield et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130255691 | Mansfield et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281885 | Rowbottom et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140051989 | McGowan et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058253 | Prough et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140155720 | Stanislaus et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140249428 | Ingold, Jr. et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140366874 | Deutsch | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160279366 | Mansfield et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170043110 | Mansfield et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170340522 | Mansfield et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1166813 | Jan 2002 | EP |
WO-2009149351 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010141415 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2013134166 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO-2013149138 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2016154607 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Boque, et al., Endotracheal tube intraluminal diameter narrowing after mechanical ventilation: use of acoustic reflectometry, Springer-Verlarg, Intensive Care Med, 2004, 30:2204-09.” |
“Schumann, et al., Detection of partial endotracheal tube obstruction by forced pressure oscillations, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology 155 (2007), 227-233.” |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/610,360, filed May 31, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,734, filed Aug. 3, 2018. |
“Extended European search report and opinion dated Nov. 17, 2015 for EP Application No. 13770312.0”. |
“Fiastro, et al., Pressure Support Compensation for Inspiratory Work due to Endotracheal Tubes and Demand Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, CHEST, Mar. 1988, 93(3):499-505.” |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability written opinion dated Jul. 11, 2013 for PCT Application No. US 2013034599”. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability written opinion, International search report and written opinion dated Jun. 24, 2016 for PCT Application No. US-2016024380”. |
“International search report and written opinion dated Jul. 9, 2013 for PCT Application US-2013028957”. |
“International search report and written opinion dated Aug. 10, 2017 for PCT Application No. US-2017035299”. |
“Notice of allowance dated Mar. 10, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/853,252.” |
“Notice of allowance dated Jul. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/783,916”. |
“Office action dated Feb. 4, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/853,252.” |
“Office action dated Jun. 11, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/783,916”. |
“Office action dated Aug. 15, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/853,252”. |
“Office action dated Aug. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/853,252”. |
“Office action dated Nov. 25, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/783,916”. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,186 Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 27, 2018”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170281887 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61617249 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13853252 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15623666 | US |