1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the use of thermostatic HVAC controls that are connected to a computer network. More specifically, the present invention pertains to application of specific adaptive waveforms to the setpoints programmed into thermostats in order to reduce energy consumption with out a subjective loss of comfort.
2. Background
Heating and cooling systems for buildings (heating, ventilation and cooling, or HVAC systems) have been controlled for decades by thermostats. At the most basic level, a thermostat includes a means to allow a user to set a desired temperature, a means to sense actual temperature, and a means to signal the heating and/or cooling devices to turn on or off in order to try to change the actual temperature to equal the desired temperature. The most basic versions of thermostats use components such as a coiled bi-metallic spring to measure actual temperature and a mercury switch that opens or completes a circuit when the spring coils or uncoils with temperature changes. More recently, electronic digital thermostats have become prevalent. These thermostats use solid-state devices such as thermistors or thermal diodes to measure temperature, and microprocessor-based circuitry to control the switch and to store and operate based upon user-determined protocols for temperature vs. time.
These programmable thermostats generally offer a very restrictive user interface, limited by the cost of the devices, the limited real estate of the small wall-mounted boxes, and the inability to take into account more than two variables: the desired temperature set by the user, and the ambient temperature sensed by the thermostat. Users can generally only set one series of commands per day, and in order to change one parameter (e.g., to change the late-night temperature) the user often has to cycle through several other parameters by repeatedly pressing one or two buttons.
Because the interface of programmable thermostats is so poor, the significant theoretical savings that are possible with them (sometimes cited as 25% of heating and cooling costs) are rarely realized. In practice, studies have found that more than 50% of users never program their thermostats at all. Significant percentages of the thermostats that are programmed are programmed sub-optimally, in part because, once programmed, people tend not to re-invest the time needed to change the settings very often.
A second problem with standard programmable thermostats is that they represent only a small evolutionary step beyond the first, purely mechanical thermostats. Like the first thermostats, they only have two input signals—ambient temperature and the preset desired temperature. The entire advance with programmable thermostats is that they can shift between multiple present temperatures at different times without real-time involvement of a human being.
Because most thermostats control HVAC systems that do not offer infinitely variable output, traditional thermostats are designed to permit the temperature as seen by the thermostat to vary above and below the setpoint to prevent the HVAC system from constantly and rapidly cycling on and off, which is inefficient and harmful to the HVAC system. The temperature range in which the thermostat allows the controlled environment to drift is known as both the dead zone and, more formally, the hysteresis zone. The hysteresis zone is frequently set at +/−1 degree Fahrenheit. Thus if the setpoint is 68 degrees, in the heating context the thermostat will allow the inside temperature to fall to 67 degrees before turning the heating system on, and will allow it to rise to 69 degrees before turning it off again.
Standard programmable thermostats are all designed with the same basic underlying premise: that the comfort of building occupants is maximized by maintaining a relatively constant temperature, at least for the duration of a given setpoint, and with the variations inherent in using a hysteresis band to trade comfort off against efficient operation and durability. That is, if a programmable thermostat has been programmed to maintain a temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit for 8 hours, it will cycle the HVAC system as needed to maintain that temperature.
However, academic research has shown that humans tend not to notice changes in temperature if (a) they are below a certain magnitude and (b) if the rate of change is sufficiently slow. For example a 1978 study found that people did not notice ramps less than 0.5° C./h (0.9° F./h). A 2004 study found that and that ramps up to 1.5° C./h (2.7° F./h) are unlikely to cause discomfort.
Because energy consumption is directly proportional to setpoint—that is, the further a given setpoint diverges from the balance point (the inside temperature assuming no HVAC activity) in a given house under given conditions, the higher energy consumption will be to maintain temperature at that setpoint), energy will be saved by any strategy that over a given time frame lowers the average heating setpoint or raises the cooling setpoint. It is therefore possible to save energy by adopting a strategy that takes advantage of human insensitivity to slow temperature ramping by incorporating a user's desired setpoint within the range of the ramp, but setting the average target temperature below the desired setpoint in the case of heating, and above it in the case of cooling. For example, a ramped summer setpoint that consisted of a repeated pattern of three phases of equal length set at 72° F., 73° F., and 74° F. would create an effective average setpoint of 73° F., but would generally be experienced by occupants as yielding equivalent comfort as in a room set at a constant 72° F. Energy savings resulting from this approach have been shown to be in the range of 4-6%.
It would be advantageous to create a temperature control system that would automatically generate optimized ramped setpoints that could save energy without compromising the comfort of the occupants. It would also be advantageous to create a temperature control system that could incorporate adaptive algorithms that could automatically determine when the ramped setpoints should not be applied due to a variety of exogenous conditions that make application of such ramped setpoints undesirable.
In one embodiment, the invention comprises a thermostat attached to an HVAC system, a local network connecting the thermostat to a larger network such as the Internet, and one or more additional thermostats attached to the network, and a server in bi-directional communication with a plurality of such thermostats. The server logs the ambient temperature sensed by each thermostat vs. time and the signals sent by the thermostats to their HVAC systems. The server preferably also logs outside temperature and humidity data for the geographic locations for the buildings served by the connected HVAC systems. Such information is widely available from various sources that publish detailed weather information based on geographic areas such as by ZIP code. The server uses this data to determine optimum application of an n-phase ramped setpoint algorithm in order to change the actual average setpoint over time without affecting the perceived temperature.
At least one embodiment of the invention comprises the steps of measuring the temperature inside a conditioned space; comparing said inside temperature to the desired setpoint for such conditioned space; evaluating the schedule for setpoint changes; determining whether the scheduled setpoint has been changed; setting the actual setpoint to the desired setpoint; determining the number of phases for actual setpoints; setting actual setpoints to increments away from the desired setpoint as additional phases, where each successive setpoint is further from said desired setpoint than the previous setpoint; and returning to the desired setpoint after said determined number of setpoints has been reached.
At least one embodiment of the invention comprises the steps of evaluating the temperature inside a conditioned environment; evaluating weather conditions outside the conditioned environment; setting a first target inside temperature for a specified time interval; setting at least a second target inside temperature for a specified time interval, where said second target temperature differs from said first target temperature by a specified amount; determining whether said variation of temperature setpoints is appropriate given said outside weather conditions; and cycling through said two or more target temperatures.
Presently preferred network 102 comprises a collection of interconnected public and/or private networks that are linked to together by a set of standard protocols to form a distributed network. While network 102 is intended to refer to what is now commonly referred to as the Internet, it is also intended to encompass variations which may be made in the future, including changes additions to existing standard protocols.
When a user of the subject invention wishes to access information on network 102, the buyer initiates connection from his computer 104. For example, the user invokes a browser, which executes on computer 104. The browser, in turn, establishes a communication link with network 102. Once connected to network 102, the user can direct the browser to access information on server 106.
One popular part of the Internet is the World Wide Web. The World Wide Web contains a large number of computers 104 and servers 106, which store HyperText Markup Language (HTML) documents capable of displaying graphical and textual information. HTML is a standard coding convention and set of codes for attaching presentation and linking attributes to informational content within documents.
The servers 106 that provide offerings on the World Wide Web are typically called websites. A website is often defined by an Internet address that has an associated electronic page. Generally, an electronic page is a document that organizes the presentation of text graphical images, audio and video. Servers 106 also provide a variety of services other than serving websites. These services, such as communicating with and controlling remote devices as described below, may be delivered via Internet Protocol or other means for communicating across a network.
In addition to the Internet, the network 102 can comprise a wide variety of interactive communication media. For example, network 102 can include local area networks, interactive television networks, telephone networks, wireless data systems, two-way cable systems, and the like.
In one embodiment, computers 104 and servers 106 are conventional computers that are equipped with communications hardware such as modem or a network interface card. The computers include processors such as those sold by Intel and AMD. Other processors may also be used, including general-purpose processors, multi-chip processors, embedded processors and the like.
Computers 104 can also be handheld and wireless devices such as personal digital assistants (PDAs), cellular telephones and other devices capable of accessing the network.
Computers 104 utilize a browser configured to interact with the World Wide Web. Such browsers may include Microsoft Explorer, Mozilla, Firefox, Opera or Safari. They may also include browsers used on handheld and wireless devices.
The storage medium may comprise any method of storing information. It may comprise random access memory (RAM), electronically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM), read only memory (ROM), hard disk, floppy disk, CD-ROM, optical memory, or other method of storing data.
Computers 104 and 106 may use an operating system such as Microsoft Windows, Apple Mac OS, Linux, Unix or the like.
Computers 106 may include a range of devices that provide information, sound, graphics and text, and may use a variety of operating systems and software optimized for distribution of content via networks.
In the currently preferred embodiment, the website 200 includes a number of components accessible to the user, as shown in
The data used to generate the content delivered in the form of the website is stored on one or more servers 106 within one or more databases. As shown in
The website 200 will allow users of connected thermostats 250 to create personal accounts. Each user's account will store information in database 900, which tracks various attributes relative to users of the site. Such attributes may include the make and model of the specific HVAC equipment in the user's home; the age and square footage of the home, the solar orientation of the home, the location of the thermostat in the home, the user's preferred temperature settings, whether the user is a participant in a demand reduction program, etc.
As shown in
In addition to using the system to allow better signaling and control of the HVAC system, which relies primarily on communication running from the server to the thermostat, the bi-directional communication will also allow the thermostat 108 to regularly measure and send to the server information about the temperature in the building. By comparing outside temperature, inside temperature, thermostat settings, cycling behavior of the HVAC system, and other variables, the system will be capable of numerous diagnostic and controlling functions beyond those of a standard thermostat.
The system installed in a subscriber's home may optionally include additional temperature sensors at different locations within the building. These additional sensors may be connected to the rest of the system via a wireless system such as 802.11 or 802.15.4, or may be connected via wires. Additional temperature and/or humidity sensors may allow increased accuracy of the system, which can in turn increase user comfort or energy savings.
In order to implement such ramped setpoints automatically, algorithms may be created. These algorithms may be generated on remote server 106 and the setpoint changes can be transmitted to a given thermostat on a just-in-time basis or, if the thermostat 108 is capable of storing future settings, they may be transferred in batch mode to such thermostats. Basic parameters used to generate such algorithms include:
the number of discrete phases to be used;
the temperature differential associated with each phase; and
the duration of each phase
In order to increase user comfort and thus maximize consumer acceptance, additional parameters may be considered, including:
time of day
outside weather conditions
recent history of manual inputs
recent pre-programmed setpoint changes.
Time of day may be relevant because, for example, if the home is typically unoccupied at a given time, there is no need for perceptual programming. Outside weather is relevant because comfort is dependent not just on temperature as sensed by a thermostat, but also includes radiant differentials. On extremely cold days, even if the inside dry-bulb temperature is within normal comfort range, radiant losses due to cold surfaces such as single-glazed windows can cause subjective discomfort; thus on such days occupants may be more sensitive to ramping. Recent manual inputs (e.g., programming overrides) may create situations in which exceptions should be taken; depending on the context, recent manual inputs may either suspend the ramping of setpoints or simply alter the baseline temperature from which the ramping takes place.
Returning to the branch after step 1208, if the current phase at that point is not phase “0”, then in step 1220, the algorithm determines whether the current setpoint is equal to the setpoint temperature in the previous phase. If not, which implies setpoints have been adjusted by the house occupants, thermostat schedules, or other events, then in step 1222, the application resets the phase to “0”, resets the new setpoint associated with phase “0” to equal the current temperature setting, and sets the current setting to that temperature. Alternatively, if the current temperature setting as determined in step 1220 is equal to the setpoint in the previous phase, then in step 1224 new setpoint is made to equal current setpoint plus the differential associated with each phase change. In step 1226 the “previous-phase setpoint” variable is reset to equal the new setpoint in anticipation of its use during a subsequent iteration.
In step 1322, the system records the changes to the thermostat settings to database 300. In step 1324, the system records the changes to the phase status of the algorithm to database 300. In step 1326, the application determines whether the new temperature setting differs from the current setting. If they are the same, the application skips applying changes to the thermostat. If they are different, then in step 1328, the application transmits revised settings to the thermostat. In step 1330, the application then hibernates for the specified duration until it is invoked again by beginning at step 1302 again.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/498,142, filed Jul. 6, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,010,237, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USING RAMPED SETPOINT TEMPERATURE VARIATION WITH NETWORKED THERMOSTATS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY, which also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/133,994, filed Jul. 7, 2008, the entirety of both of which are incorporated herein by reference and is to be considered part of this specification.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4136732 | Demaray et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4341345 | Hammer et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4403644 | Hebert | Sep 1983 | A |
4475685 | Grimado et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4655279 | Harmon | Apr 1987 | A |
4674027 | Beckey | Jun 1987 | A |
5124502 | Nelson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5244146 | Jefferson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5270952 | Adams et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5314004 | Strand et al. | May 1994 | A |
5462225 | Massara et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5544036 | Brown et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555927 | Shah | Sep 1996 | A |
5572438 | Ehlers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5682949 | Ratcliffe et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5717609 | Packa et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725148 | Hartman | Mar 1998 | A |
5729474 | Hildebrand et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5818347 | Dolan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5977964 | Williams et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6079626 | Hartman | Jun 2000 | A |
6115713 | Pascucci et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6145751 | Ahmed | Nov 2000 | A |
6178362 | Woolard et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6241156 | Kline et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260765 | Natale et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6351693 | Monie | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6400956 | Richton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6400996 | Hoffberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6437692 | Petite et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6478233 | Shah | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480803 | Pierret et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483906 | Lggulden et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6536675 | Pesko et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542076 | Joao | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549130 | Joao | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574537 | Kipersztok et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6580950 | Johnson | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594825 | Goldschmidtlki et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595430 | Shah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598056 | Hull et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6619555 | Rosen | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622097 | Hunter | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622115 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622925 | Carner et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622926 | Sartain et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628997 | Fox et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633823 | Bartone et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6643567 | Kolk et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6644098 | Cardinale et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671586 | Davis et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6695218 | Fleckenstein | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6700224 | Biskup, Sr. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726113 | Guo | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731992 | Ziegler | May 2004 | B1 |
6734806 | Cratsley | May 2004 | B1 |
6772052 | Amundsen | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785592 | Smith | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785630 | Kolk | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786421 | Rosen | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6789739 | Rosen | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6853959 | Ikeda et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6868293 | Schurr | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6868319 | Kipersztok et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882712 | Iggulden et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6889908 | Crippen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6891838 | Petite et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6912429 | Bilger | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6991029 | Orfield et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7009493 | Howard | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7031880 | Seem et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039532 | Hunter | May 2006 | B2 |
7061393 | Buckingham et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7089088 | Terry et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7130719 | Ehlers et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130832 | Bannai et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
H2176 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2006 | H |
7167079 | Smyth et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187986 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7205892 | Luebke et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215746 | Iggulden et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7216015 | Poth | May 2007 | B2 |
7231424 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7232075 | Rosen | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7242988 | Hoffberg et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7260823 | Schlack et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7356384 | Gull et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7476020 | Zufferey et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483964 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7644869 | Hoglund et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7702424 | Cannon et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7758729 | DeWhitt | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7784704 | Harter | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7848900 | Steinberg et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7869904 | Cannon et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7894943 | Sloup et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7908116 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908117 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8010237 | Cheung et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8019567 | Steinberg et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
D646990 | Rhodes | Oct 2011 | S |
8090477 | Steinberg | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8131497 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131506 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
D659560 | Rhodes | May 2012 | S |
8180492 | Steinberg | May 2012 | B2 |
8340826 | Steinberg et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
D673467 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | S |
8412488 | Steinberg et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8423322 | Steinberg et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8457797 | Imes et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8498753 | Steinberg et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8556188 | Steinberg | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8596550 | Steinberg et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8712590 | Steinberg | Apr 2014 | B2 |
D705095 | Steinberg et al. | May 2014 | S |
8738327 | Steinberg et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8740100 | Steinberg | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8751186 | Steinberg et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8840033 | Steinberg | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8850348 | Fadell et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8886488 | Steinberg et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20030040934 | Skidmore et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040176880 | Obradovich et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050222889 | Lai et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050288822 | Rayburn | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060045105 | Dobosz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060214014 | Bash et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070043477 | Ehlers et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045431 | Chapman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070146126 | Wang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080083234 | Krebs et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080198549 | Rasmussen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080281472 | Podgorny et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090052859 | Greenberger et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090099699 | Steinberg et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125151 | Steinberg et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090240381 | Lane | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090281667 | Masui et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100019052 | Yip | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100070086 | Harrod et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070089 | Harrod et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070093 | Harrod et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100156608 | Bae et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162285 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100211224 | Keeling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235004 | Thind | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100289643 | Trundle et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100318227 | Steinberg et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110031323 | Nold et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046792 | Imes et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046798 | Imes et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046799 | Imes et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046800 | Imes et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046801 | Imes et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110051823 | Imes et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110054699 | Imes et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110054710 | Imes et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110173542 | Imes et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202185 | Imes et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110214060 | Imes et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224838 | Imes et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246898 | Imes et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110253796 | Posa et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110290893 | Steinberg | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307101 | Imes et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120023225 | Imes et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120046859 | Imes et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120064923 | Imes et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065935 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072033 | Imes et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120086562 | Steinberg | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120093141 | Imes et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101637 | Imes et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120135759 | Imes et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158350 | Steinberg et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120215725 | Imes et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221151 | Steinberg | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221718 | Imes et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120252430 | Imes et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120324119 | Imes et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130053054 | Lovitt et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054758 | Imes et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054863 | Imes et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060387 | Imes et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130144453 | Subbloie | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130167035 | Imes et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173064 | Fadell et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130226502 | Steinberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130310989 | Steinberg et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130338837 | Hublou et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140039690 | Steinberg | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140188290 | Steinberg et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140229018 | Steinberg | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140316581 | Fadell et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150021405 | Steinberg | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150025691 | Fadell et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150043615 | Steinberg et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0415747 | Mar 1991 | EP |
05-189659 | Jul 1993 | JP |
2010-038377 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010-286218 | Dec 2010 | JP |
10-1994-0011902 | Jun 1994 | KR |
10-1999-0070368 | Sep 1999 | KR |
10-2000-0059532 | Oct 2000 | KR |
WO 2011149600 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2012024534 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO 2013187996 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,074, filed Aug. 30, 2012, Steinberg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,697, filed Jun. 14, 2012, Hublou et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,447, filed Jun. 6, 2013, Steinberg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/852,577, filed Mar. 28, 2013, Steinberg et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/858,710, filed Sep. 5, 2013, Steinberg et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/861,189, filed Apr. 11, 2013, Steinberg et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/082,675, filed Nov. 18, 2003, Steinberg et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/285,384, filed May 22, 2014, Steinberg et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/292,377, filed May 30, 2014, Steinberg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,554, filed Sep. 19, 2014, Steinberg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/527,433, filed Oct. 29, 2014, Steinberg et al. |
Arens, et al, “How Ambient Intelligence Will Improve Habitability and Energy Efficiency in Buildings”, 2005, research paper, Center for the Built Environment, Controls and Information Technology. |
Comverge SuperStat Flyer, prior to Jun. 28, 2007. |
Control4 Wireless Thermostat Brochure, 2006. |
Cooper Power Systems Web Page, 2000-2009. |
Enernoc Web Page, 2004-2009. |
Enerwise Website, 1999-2009. |
Honeywell Programmable Thermostat Owner's Guide, www.honeywell.com/yourhome, 2004. |
Honeywell, W7600/W7620 Controller Reference Manual, HW0021207, Oct. 1992. |
Johnson Controls, Touch4 building automation system brochure, 2007. |
Kilicotte, et al., “Dynamic Controls for Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Framework Concepts and a New Construction Study Case in New York”, Proceedings of the 2006 ACEEE Summer Study of Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Pacific Grove. CA, Aug. 13-18, 2006. |
Lin, et al., “Multi-Sensor Single-Actuator Control of HVAC Systems”, 2002. |
Pier, Southern California Edison, Demand Responsive Control of Air Conditioning via Programmable Communicating Thermostats Draft Report, Feb. 14, 2006. |
Proliphix Thermostat Brochure, prior to Jun. 2007. |
Wang, et al., “Opportunities to Save Energy and Improve Comfort by Using Wireless Sensor Networks in Buildings,” (2003), Center for Environmental Design Research. |
Wetter, et al., A comparison of deterministic and probabilistic optimization algorithms for non-smooth simulation-based optimization, Building and Environment 39, 2004, pp. 989-999. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/263,762, filed Apr. 28, 2014, Steinberg. |
Bourhan, et al., “Dynamic model of an HVAC system for control analysis”, Elsevier 2004. |
Brush, et al., Preheat—Controlling Home Heating with Occupancy Prediction, 2013. |
Emerson Climate Technologies, “Network Thermostat for E2 Building Controller Installation and Operation Manual”, 2007. |
Gupta, Adding GPS-Control to Traditional Thermostats: An Exploration of Potential Energy Savings and Design Challenges, MIT, 2009. |
Gupta, et al., A Persuasive GPS-Controlled Thermostat System, MIT, 2008. |
Johnson Controls, “T600HCx-3 Single-Stage Thermostats”, 2006. |
Krumm, et al., Learning Time-Based Presence Probabilities, Jun. 2011. |
Raji, “Smart Networks for Control”, IEEE Spectrum, Jun. 1994. |
Scott, et al., Home Heating Using GPS-Based Arrival Prediction, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/035726, dated Aug. 6, 2013. |
Written Opinion and Search Report for PCT/US2011/032537, dated Dec. 12, 2011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2013/035726 dated Dec. 16, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110307103 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61133994 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12498142 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 13219381 | US |