System and method for using trigger events and a redirector flag to redirect messages

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9374435
  • Patent Number
    9,374,435
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 29, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 21, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A system and method of redirecting messages between a mail system and a mobile communications device, upon determining an occurrence of a trigger event that is configured to initiate redirection of messages at the mail system with respect to the user, the system sets a redirection flag associated with the user. Upon detecting arrival of a new message at the mail system for the user, the system determines whether the redirection flag associated with the user is set and if the redirection flag is set, causes an instance of the new message to be packaged for transmission to the mobile communications device associated with the user.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed toward the field of replicating information from a host system where the information is normally stored to a mobile data communication device. In particular, the system and method of the present invention provide an event-driven redirection computer program (“redirector program”) operating at the host system, which, upon sensing a particular user-defined event has occurred, redirects user-selected data items from the host system to the user's mobile data communication device. The mobile data communication device is preferably coupled to the host system via a wireless network and one or more landline networks. Due to the bandwidth limitations of wireless networks, only a portion of a user-selected data item is generally redirected to the user's mobile device, with the user given the option of then retrieving the entire data item (or some other portion of the data item) from the host system.


Instead of warehousing (or storing) the user's data items at the host system and then “synchronizing” the mobile data communication device to data items stored at the host system when the mobile device requests that such items of information be communicated to it, the present invention employs a “push” paradigm that continuously packages and retransmits the user-selected items of information to the mobile data communication device in response to a triggering event detected at the host system. Wireless mobile data communications devices, especially those that can return a confirmation signal to the host that the pushed data has been received are especially well suited for this type of push paradigm.


Present systems and methods for replicating information from a host system to a user's mobile data communication device are typically “synchronization” systems in which the user's data items are warehoused (or stored) at the host system for an indefinite period of time and then transmitted in bulk only in response to a user request. In these types of systems and methods, when replication of the warehoused data items to the mobile device is desired, the user typically places the mobile device in an interface cradle that is electrically connected to the host system via some form of local, dedicated communication, such as a serial cable or an infrared or other type of wireless link. Software executing on the mobile data communication device then transmits commands via the local communications link to the host system to cause the host to begin transmitting the user's data items for storage in a memory bank of the mobile device. In these synchronization schemes, the mobile unit “pulls” the warehoused information from the host system in a batch each time the user desires to replicate information between the two devices. Therefore, the two systems (host and mobile) only maintain the same data items after a user-initiated command sequence that causes the mobile device to download the data items from the host system. A general problem with these synchronization systems is that the only time that the user data items are replicated between the host system and the mobile data communication device is when the user commands the mobile device to download or pull the user data from the host system. Five minutes later a new message could be sent to the user, but the user would not receive that message until the next time the user fetches the user data items. Thus, a user may fail to respond to an emergency update or message because the user only periodically synchronizes the system, such as once per day. Other problems with these systems include: (1) the amount of data to be reconciled between the host and the mobile device can become large if the user does not “synchronize” on a daily or hourly basis, leading to bandwidth difficulties, particularly when the mobile device is communicating via a wireless packet-switched network; and (2) reconciling large amounts of data, as can accrue in these batch-mode synchronization systems, can require a great deal of communication between the host and the mobile device, thus leading to a more complex, costly and energy-inefficient system. A more automated, continuous, efficient and reliable system of ensuring that user data items are replicated at the user's mobile device is therefore needed.


An additional feature of the present invention is that the push paradigm, in combination with a return communications pathway, lends itself well to a system that permits a user to control remotely, through the user's mobile device, a number of aspects of the host system.


There remains a general need in this art for a system and method of continuously pushing user-selected data items (or certain portions of the selected data items) stored at a host system to a user's mobile data communication device.


There remains a more particular need for such a system and method where user-selected data items are continuously “pushed” from the host system to the mobile data communication device upon the occurrence of one or more user-defined triggering events.


There remains an additional need for such a system and method that provides flexibility in the types and quantities of user data items that are pushed from the host system to the mobile data communication device and that also provides flexibility in the configuration and types of events that can serve to trigger the redirection of the user data items.


There remains yet an additional need for such a system and method that can operate locally on a user's desktop PC or at a distance via a network server.


There remains still another need for such a system and method that provides for secure, transparent delivery of the user-selected data items from the host system to the mobile device.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention overcomes the problems noted above and satisfies the needs in this field for a system and method of pushing user-selected data items from a host system to a user's mobile data communication device upon detecting the occurrence of one or more user-defined event triggers. As used in this application, the term host system refers to the computer where the redirector software is operating. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the host system is a user's desktop PC, although, alternatively, the host system could be a network server connected to the user's PC via a local-area network (“LAN)”, or could be any other system that is in communication with the user's desktop PC.


A redirector program operating at the host system enables the user to redirect or mirror certain user-selected data items (or parts of data items) from the host system to the user's mobile data communication device upon detecting that one or more user-defined triggering events has occurred. Also operating at the host system are various sub-systems that can be configured to create triggering events, such as a screen saver sub-system or a keyboard sub-system, as well as sub-systems for repackaging the user's data items for transparent delivery to the mobile data device, such as a TCP/IP sub-system or one or more E-Mail sub-systems. Other sub-systems for creating triggering events and repackaging the user's data items could also be present at the host system. The host system also includes a primary memory store where the user's data items are normally stored.


Using the redirector program, the user can select certain data items for redirection, such as E-mail messages, calendar events, meeting notifications, address entries, journal entries, personal reminders etc. Having selected the data items for redirection, the user can then configure one or more event triggers to be sensed by the redirector program to initiate redirection of the user data items. These user-defined trigger points (or event triggers) include external events, internal events and networked events. Examples of external events include: receiving a message from the user's mobile data communication device to begin redirection; receiving a similar message from some external computer; sensing that the user is no longer in the vicinity of the host system; or any other event that is external to the host system. Internal events could be a calendar alarm, screen saver activation, keyboard timeout, programmable timer, or any other user-defined event that is internal to the host system. Networked events are user-defined messages that are transmitted to the host system from another computer coupled to the host system via a network to initiate redirection. These are just some of the examples of the types of user-defined events that can trigger the redirector program to push data items from the host to the mobile device. Although in the preferred embodiment it is anticipated that the configuration that specifies which data items will be redirected and in what form will be set at the host system, it is within the scope of this invention that such configuration may be set or modified through data sent from the mobile communications device.


In addition to the functionality noted above, the redirector program provides a set of software-implemented control functions for determining the type of mobile data communication device and its address, for programming a preferred list of message types that are to be redirected, and for determining whether the mobile device can receive and process certain types of message attachments, such as word processor or voice attachments. The determination of whether a particular mobile device can receive and process attachments is initially configured by the user of that mobile device at the host system. This configuration can be altered on a global or per message basis by transmitting a command message from the mobile device to the host system. If the redirector is configured so that the mobile data device cannot receive and process word processor or voice attachments, then the redirector routes these attachments to an external machine that is compatible with the particular attachment, such as an attached printer or networked fax machine or telephone. Other types of attachments could be redirected to other types of external machines in a similar fashion, depending upon the capabilities of the mobile device. For example, if a user is traveling and receives a message with an attachment that the user's mobile device can process or display, the user may from a mobile communications device send a command message to the host system indicating that that attachment is to be sent to a fax machine at a hotel where the user will be spending the evening. This enables the user to receive important E-mail attachments as long as the host system is provided with sufficient information about the destination where the attachment is to be forwarded.


Once an event has triggered redirection of the user data items, the host system then repackages these items in a manner that is transparent to the mobile data communication device, so that information on the mobile device appears similar to information on the user's host system. The preferred repackaging method includes wrapping the user data items in an E-mail envelope that corresponds to the address of the mobile data communication device, although, alternatively, other repackaging methods could be used with the present invention, such as special-purpose TCP/IP wrapping techniques, or other methods of wrapping the user selected data items. The repackaging preferably results in E-mail messages generated by the user from the mobile device to be transmitted from the host system, thus enabling the user to appear to have a single E-mail address, such that the recipients of messages sent from the mobile communications device do not know where the user was physically located when the message was first sent. The repackaging also permits both messages to the mobile device and sent from the mobile device to be encrypted and decrypted as well as compressed and decompressed.


In an alternative system and method, the redirector program executes on a network server, and the server is programmed to detect numerous redirection event triggers over the network from multiple user desktop computers coupled to the server via a LAN. The server can receive internal event triggers from each of the user desktops via the network, and can also receive external event triggers, such as messages from the users' mobile data communication devices. In response to receiving one of these triggers, the server redirects the user's data items to the proper mobile data communication device. The user data items and addressing information for a particular mobile device can be stored at the server or at the user's PC. Using this alternative configuration, one redirector program can serve a plurality of users. This alternative configuration could also include an internet- or intranet-based redirector program that could be accessible through a secure webpage or other user interface. The redirector program could be located on an Internet Service Provider's system and accessible only through the Internet.


In another alternative configuration of the present invention, a redirector program operates at both the host system and at the user's mobile data communication device. In this configuration, the user's mobile device operates similarly to the host system described below, and is configured in a similar fashion to push certain user-selected data items from the mobile device to the user's host system (or some other computer) upon detecting an event trigger at the mobile device. This configuration provides two-way pushing of information from the host to the mobile device and from the mobile device to the host.


The primary advantage of the present invention is that it provides a system and method for triggering the continuous and real-time redirection of user-selected data items from a host system to a mobile data communication device. Other advantages of the present invention include: (1) flexibility in defining the types of user data to redirect, and in defining a preferred list of message types that are to be redirected or preferred senders whose messages are to be redirected; (2) flexibility in configuring the system to respond to numerous internal, external and networked triggering events; (3) transparent repackaging of the user data items in a variety of ways such that the mobile data communication device appears as though it were the host system; (4) integration with other host system components such as E-mail, TCP/IP, keyboard, screen saver, webpages and certain programs that can either create user data items or be configured to provide trigger points; and (5) the ability to operate locally on a user's desktop system or at a distance via a network server.


These are just a few of the many advantages of the present invention, as described in more detail below. As will be appreciated, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various respects, all without departing from the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description of the preferred embodiments set forth below are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention satisfies the needs noted above as will become apparent from the following description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 is a system diagram showing the redirection of user data items from a user's desktop PC (host system) to the user's mobile data communication device, where the redirector software is operating at the user's desktop PC.



FIG. 2 is a system diagram showing the redirection of user data items from a network server (host system) to the user's mobile data communication device, where the redirector software is operating at the server.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the interaction of the redirector software with other components of the host system in FIG. 1 (the user's desktop PC) to enable the pushing of information from the host system to the user's mobile data communication device.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart showing the steps carried out by the redirector software operating at the host system.



FIG. 5 is a flow chart showing the steps carried out by the mobile data communication device to interface with the redirector software operating at the host system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1 is an example system diagram showing the redirection of user data items (such as message A or C) from a user's office PC (host system) 10 to the user's mobile data communication device 24, where the redirector software 12 is operating at the user's PC. Message A in FIG. 1 represents an internal message sent from desktop 26 to the user's host system 10 via LAN 14. Message C in FIG. 1 represents an external message from a sender that is not directly connected to LAN 14, such as the user's mobile data communication device 24, some other user's mobile device (not shown), or any user connected to the Internet 18. Message C also represents a command message from the user's mobile data communication device 24 to the host system 10. As described in more detail in FIG. 3, the host system 10 preferably includes, along with the typical hardware and software associated with a workstation or desktop computer, the redirector program 12, a TCP/IP subsystem 42, a primary message store 40, an E-mail subsystem 44, a screen saver subsystem 48, and a keyboard subsystem 46.


In FIG. 1, the host system 10 is the user's desktop system, typically located in the user's office. The host system 10 is connected to a LAN 14, which also connects to other computers 26, 28 that may be in the user's office or elsewhere. The LAN 14, in turn, is connected to a wide area network (“WAN”) 18, preferably the Internet, which is defined by the use of the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (“TCP/IP”) to exchange information, but which, alternatively could be any other type of WAN. The connection of the LAN 14 to the WAN 18 is via high bandwidth link 16, typically a T1 or T3 connection. The WAN 18 in turn is connected to a variety of gateways 20, via connections 32. A gateway forms a connection or bridge between the WAN 18 and some other type of network, such as an RF wireless network, cellular network, satellite network, or other synchronous or asynchronous land-line connection.


In the example of FIG. 1, a wireless gateway 20 is connected to the Internet for communicating via wireless link 22 to a plurality of wireless mobile data communication devices 24. Also shown in FIG. 1 is machine 30, which could be a FAX machine, a printer, a system for displaying images (such as video) or a machine capable of processing and playing audio files, such as a voice mail system. The present invention includes the ability to redirect certain message attachments to such, an external machine 30 if the redirector program configuration data reflects that the mobile device 24 cannot receive and process the attachments, or if the user has specified that certain attachments are not to be forwarded to mobile device 24, even if such device can process those attachments. By way of example, consider an E-mail sent to a user that includes three attachments—a word processing document, a video clip and an audio clip. The redirection program could be configured to send the text of the E-mail to the remote device, to send the word processing document to a networked printer located near the user, to send the video clip to a store accessible through a secure connection through the internet and to send the audio clip to the user's voice mail system. This example is not intended to limit the breadth and scope of the invention, but rather to illustrate the variety of possibilities embodied in the redirection concept.


The preferred mobile data communication device 24 is a hand-held two-way wireless paging computer, a wirelessly enabled palm-top computer, a mobile telephone with data messaging capabilities, or a wirelessly enabled laptop computer, but could, alternatively be other types of mobile data communication devices capable of sending and receiving messages via a network connection 22. Although it is preferable for the system to operate in a two-way communications mode, certain aspects of the invention could be beneficially used in a “one and one-half” or acknowledgment paging environment, or even with a one-way paging system. The mobile data communication device 24 includes software program instructions that work in conjunction with the redirector program 12 to enable the seamless, transparent redirection of user-selected data items. FIG. 4 describes the basic method steps of the redirector program 12, and FIG. 5 describes the steps of the corresponding program operating at the mobile device 24.


In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, not explicitly shown in the drawings, the mobile device 24 also includes a redirector program. In this embodiment, user selected data items can be replicated from the host to the mobile device and vice versa. The configuration and operation of the mobile device 24 having a redirector program is similar to that described herein with respect to FIGS. 1-4.


A user of the present invention can configure the redirector program 12 to push certain user-selected data items to the user's mobile data communication device 24 when the redirector 12 detects that a particular user-defined event trigger (or trigger point) has taken place. User-selected data items preferably include E-mail messages, calendar events, meeting notifications, address entries, journal entries, personal alerts, alarms, warnings, stock quotes, news bulletins, etc., but could, alternatively, include any other type of message that is transmitted to the host system 10, or that the host system 10 acquires through the use of intelligent agents, such as data that is received after the host system 10 initiates a search of a database or a website or a bulletin board. In some instances, only a portion of the data item is transmitted to the mobile device 24 in order to minimize the amount of data transmitted via the wireless network 22. In these instances, the mobile device 24 can optionally send a command message to the host system to receive more or all of the data item if the user desires to receive it.


Among the user-defined event triggers that can be detected by the redirector program 12 are in the preferred embodiment external events, internal events and networked events. External events preferably include: (1) receiving a command message (such as message C) from the user's mobile data communication device to begin redirection, or to execute some other command at the host, such as a command to enable the preferred list mode, or to add or subtract a particular sender from the preferred list; (2) receiving a similar message from some external computer; and (3) sensing that the user is no longer in the vicinity of the host system; although, alternatively, an external event can be any other detectable occurrence that is external to the host system. Internal events could be a calendar alarm, screen saver activation, keyboard timeout, programmable timer, or any other user-defined event that is internal to the host system. Networked events are user-defined messages that are transmitted to the host system from another computer coupled to the host system via a network to initiate redirection. These are just some of the events that could be used with the present invention to initiate replication of the user-selected data items from the host system 10 to the mobile device 24.



FIG. 1 shows an E-mail message A being communicated over LAN 14 from computer 26 to the user's desktop system 10 (also shown in FIG. 1 is an external message C, which could be an E-mail message from an Internet user, or could be a command message from the user's mobile device 24). Once the message A (or C) reaches the primary message store of the host system 10, it can be detected and acted upon by the redirection software 12. The redirection software 12 can use many methods of detecting new messages. The preferred method of detecting new messages is using Microsoft's® Messaging API (MAPI), in which programs, such as the redirector program 12, register for notifications or ‘advise syncs’ when changes to a mailbox take place. Other methods of detecting new messages could also be used with the present invention.


Assuming that the redirector program 12 is activated, and has been configured by the user (either through the sensing of an internal, network or external event) to replicate certain user data items (including messages of type A or C) to the mobile device 24, when the message A is received at the host system 10, the redirector program 12 detects its presence and prepares the message for redirection to the mobile device 24. In preparing the message for redirection, the redirector program 12 could compress the original message A, could compress the message header, or could encrypt the entire message A to create a secure link to the mobile device 24.


Also programmed into the redirector 12 is the address of the user's mobile data communication device 24, the type of device, and whether the device 24 can accept certain types of attachments, such as word processing or voice attachments. If the user's type of mobile device cannot accept these types of attachments, then the redirector 12 can be programmed to route the attachments to a fax or voice number where the user is located using an attached fax or voice machine 30.


The redirector may also be programmed with a preferred list mode that is configured by the user either at the host system 10, or remotely from the user's mobile data communication device by transmitting a command message C. The preferred list contains a list of senders (other users) whose messages are to be redirected or a list of message characteristics that determine whether a message is to be redirected. If activated, the preferred list mode causes the redirector program 12 to operate like a filter, only redirecting certain user data items based on whether the data item was sent from a sender on the preferred list or has certain message characteristics that if present will trigger or suppress redirection of the message. In the example of FIG. 1, if desktop system 26 was operated by a user on the preferred list of host system 10, and the preferred list option was activated, then message A would be redirected. If, however, desktop 26 was operated by a user not on the host system's preferred list, then message A would not be redirected, even if the user of the host system had configured the redirector to push messages of type A. The user of the host system 10 can configure the preferred list directly from the desktop system, or, alternatively, the user can then send a command message (such as C) from the mobile device 24 to the desktop system 10 to activate the preferred list mode, or to add or delete certain senders or message characteristics from the preferred list that was previously configured. It should be appreciated that a redirection program could combine message characteristics and preferred sender lists to result in a more finely-tuned filter. Messages marked as low priority or that are simple return receipts or message read receipts, for example, could always be suppressed from redirection while messages from a particular sender would always be redirected.


After the redirector has determined that a particular message should be redirected, and it has prepared the message for redirection, the software 12 then sends the message A to a secondary memory store located in the mobile device 24, using whatever means are necessary. In the preferred embodiment this method is to send the message A back over the LAN 14, WAN 18, and through the wireless gateway 20 to the mobile data communication device 24. In doing so, the redirector preferably repackages message A as an E-mail with an outer envelope B that contains the addressing information of the mobile device 24, although alternative repackaging techniques and protocols could be used, such as a TCP/IP repackaging and delivery method (most commonly used in the alternative server configuration shown in FIG. 2). The wireless gateway 20 requires this outer envelope information B in order to know where to send the redirected message A. Once the message (A in B) is received by the mobile device 24, the outer envelope B is removed and the original message A is placed in the secondary memory store within the mobile device 24. By repackaging and removing the outer envelope in this manner, the present invention causes the mobile computer 24 to appear to be at the same physical location as the host system 10, thus creating a transparent system.


In the case where message C is representative of an external message from a computer on the Internet 18 to the host system 10, and the host 10 has been configured to redirect messages of type C, then in a similar manner to message A, message C would be repackaged with an outer envelope B and transmitted to the user's mobile device 24. In the case where message C is representative of a command message from the user's mobile device 24 to the host system 10, the command message C is not redirected, but is acted upon by the host system 10.


If the redirected user data item is an E-mail message, as described above, the user at the mobile device 24 sees the original subject, sender's address, destination address, carbon copy and blind carbon copy. When the user replies to this message, or when the user authors a new message, the software operating at the mobile device 24 adds a similar outer envelope to the reply message (or the new message) to cause the message to be routed first to the user's host system 10, which then removes the outer envelope and redirects the message to the final destination, such as back to computer 26. In the preferred embodiment, this results in the outgoing redirected message from the user's host system 10 being sent using the E-mail address of the host mailbox, rather than the address of the mobile device, so that it appears to the recipient of the message that the message originated from the user's desktop system 10 rather than the mobile data communication device. Any replies to the redirected message will then be sent to the desktop system 10, which if it is still in redirector mode, will repackage the reply and resend it to the user's mobile data device, as described above.



FIG. 2 is an alternative system diagram showing the redirection of user data items from a network server 11 to the user's mobile data communication device 24, where the redirector software 12 is operating at the server 11. This configuration is particularly advantageous for use with message servers such as Microsoft's® Exchange Server, which is normally operated so that all user messages are kept in one central location or mailbox store on the server instead of in a store within each user's desktop PC. This configuration has the additional advantage of allowing a single system administrator to configure and keep track of all users having messages redirected. If the system includes encryption keys, these too can be kept at one place for management and update purposes.


In this alternative configuration, server 11 preferably maintains a user profile for each user's desktop system 10, 26, 28, including information such as whether a particular user can have data items redirected, which types of message and information to redirect, what events will trigger redirection, the address of the users' mobile data communication device 24, the type of mobile device, and the user's preferred list, if any. The event triggers are preferably detected at the user's desktop system 10, 26, 28 and can be any of the external, internal or network events listed above. The desktop systems 10, 26, 28 preferably detect these events and then transmit a message to the server computer 11 via LAN 14 to initiate redirection. Although the user data items are preferably stored at the server computer 11 in this embodiment, they could, alternatively, be stored at each user's desktop system 10, 26, 28, which would then transmit them to the server computer 11 after an event has triggered redirection.


As shown in FIG. 2, desktop system 26 generates a message A that is transmitted to and stored at the host system 11, which is the network server operating the redirector program 12. The message A is for desktop system 10, but in this embodiment, user messages are stored at the network server 11. When an event occurs at desktop system 10, an event trigger is generated and transmitted to the network server 11, which then determines who the trigger is from, whether that desktop has redirection capabilities, and if so, the server (operating the redirector program) uses the stored configuration information to redirect message A to the mobile computer 24 associated with the user of desktop system 10.


As described above with reference to FIG. 1, message C could be either a command message from a user's mobile data communication device 24, or it could be a message from an external computer, such as a computer connected to the Internet 18. If the message C is from an Internet computer to the user's desktop system 10, and the user has redirection capabilities, then the server 11 detects the message C, repackages it using electronic envelope B, and redirects the repackaged message (C in B) to the user's mobile device 24. If the message C is a command message from the user's mobile device 24, then the server 11 simply acts upon the command message.


Turning now to FIG. 3, a block diagram showing the interaction of the redirector software 12 with additional components of the host system 10 of FIG. 1 (the desktop PC) to enable more fully the pushing of information from the host system 10 to the user's mobile data communication device 24 is set forth. These additional components are illustrative of the type of event-generating systems that can be configured and used with the redirector software 12, and of the type of repackaging systems that can be used to interface with the mobile communication device 24 to make it appear transparent to the user.


The desktop system 10 is connected to LAN 14, and can send and receive data, messages, signals, event triggers, etc., to and from other systems connected to the LAN 14 and to external networks 18, 22, such as the Internet or a wireless data network, which are also coupled to the LAN 14. In addition to the standard hardware, operating system, and application programs associated with a typical microcomputer or workstation, the desktop system 10 includes the redirector program 12, a TCP/IP sub-system 42, an E-mail sub-system 44, a primary data storage device 40, a screen saver sub-system 48, and a keyboard sub-system 46. Redirector program 12 can be stored on primary data storage device 40 or other non-transitory computer-accessible medium, but is not limited to such. The TCP/IP and E-mail subsystems 42, 44 are examples of repackaging systems that can be used to achieve the transparency of the present invention, and the screen saver and keyboard sub-systems 46, 48 are examples of event generating systems that can be configured to generate event messages or signals that trigger redirection of the user selected data items.


The method steps carried out by the redirector program 12 are described in more detail in FIG. 4. The basic functions of this program are: (1) configure and setup the user-defined event trigger points that will start redirection; (2) configure the types of user data items for redirection and optionally configure a preferred list of senders whose messages are to be redirected; (3) configure the type and capabilities of the user's mobile data communication device; (4) receive messages and signals from the repackaging systems and the event generating systems; and (5) command and control the redirection of the user-selected data items to the mobile data communication device via the repackaging systems. Other functions not specifically enumerated could also be integrated into this program.


The E-Mail sub-system 44 is the preferred link to repackaging the user-selected data items for transmission to the mobile data communication device 24, and preferably uses industry standard mail protocols, such as SMTP, POP, IMAP, MIME and RFC-822, to name but a few. The E-Mail sub-system 44 can receive messages A from external computers on the LAN 14, or can receive messages C from some external network such as the Internet 18 or a wireless data communication network 22, and stores these messages in the primary data store 40. Assuming that the redirector 12 has been triggered to redirect messages of this type, the redirector detects the presence of any new messages and instructs the E-Mail system 44 to repackage the message by placing an outer wrapper B about the original message A (or C), and by providing the addressing information of the mobile data communication device 24 on the outer wrapper B. As noted above, this outer wrapper B is removed by the mobile device 24, and the original message A (or C) is then recovered, thus making the mobile device 24 appear to be the desktop system 10.


In addition, the E-Mail sub-system 44 receives messages back from the mobile device 24 having an outer wrapper with the addressing information of the desktop system 10, and strips this information away so that the message can be routed to the proper sender of the original message A (or C). The E-Mail sub-system also receives command messages C from the mobile device 24 that are directed to the desktop system 10 to trigger redirection or to carry out some other function. The functionality of the E-Mail sub-system 44 is controlled by the redirector program 12.


The TCP/IP sub-system 42 is an alternative repackaging system. It includes all of the functionality of the E-Mail sub-system 44, but instead of repackaging the user-selected data items as standard E-mail messages, this system repackages the data items using special-purpose TCP/IP packaging techniques. This type of special-purpose sub-system is usefull in situations where security and improved speed are important to the user. The provision of a special-purpose wrapper that can only be removed by special software on the mobile device 24 provides the added security, and the bypassing of E-mail store and forward systems can improve speed and real-time delivery.


As described previously, the present invention can be triggered to begin redirection upon detecting numerous external, internal and networked events, or trigger points. Examples of external events include: receiving a command message from the user's mobile data communication device 24 to begin redirection; receiving a similar message from some external computer; sensing that the user is no longer in the vicinity of the host system; or any other event that is external to the host system. Internal events could be a calendar alarm, screen saver activation, keyboard timeout, programmable timer, or any other user-defined event that is internal to the host system. Networked events are user-defined messages that are transmitted to the host system from another computer that is connected to the host system via a network to initiate redirection.


The screen saver and keyboard sub-systems 46, 48 are examples of systems that are capable of generating internal events. Functionally, the redirector program 12 provides the user with the ability to configure the screen saver and keyboard systems so that under certain conditions an event trigger will be generated that can be detected by the redirector 12 to start the redirection process. For example, the screen saver system can be configured so that when the screen saver is activated, after, for example, 10 minutes of inactivity on the desktop system, an event trigger is transmitted to the redirector 12, which starts redirecting the previously selected user data items. In a similar manner the keyboard sub-system can be configured to generate event triggers when no key has been depressed for a particular period of time, thus indicating that redirection should commence. These are just two examples of the numerous application programs and hardware systems internal to the host system 10 that can be used to generate internal event triggers.



FIGS. 4 and 5, set forth, respectively, flow charts showing the steps carried out by the redirector software 12 operating at the host system 10, and the steps carried out by the mobile data communication device 24 in order to interface with the host system. Turning first to FIG. 4, at step 50, the redirector program 12 is started and initially configured. The initial configuration of the redirector 12 includes: (1) defining the event triggers that the user has determined will trigger redirection; (2) selecting the user data items for redirection; (3) selecting the repackaging sub-system, either standard E-Mail, or special-purpose technique; (4) selecting the type of data communication device, indicating whether and what type of attachments the device is capable of receiving and processing, and inputting the address of the mobile device; and (5) configuring the preferred list of user selected senders whose messages are to be redirected.



FIG. 4 sets forth the basic steps of the redirector program 12 assuming it is operating at a desktop system 10, such as shown in FIG. 1. If the redirector 12 is operating at a network server 11, as shown in FIG. 2, then additional configuration steps may be necessary to enable redirection for a particular desktop system 10, 26, 28 connected to the server, including: (1) setting up a profile for the desktop system indicating its address, events that will trigger redirection, and the data items that are to be redirected upon detecting an event; (2) maintaining a storage area at the server for the data items; and (3) storing the type of data communication device to which the desktop system's data items are to be redirected, whether and what type of attachments the device is capable of receiving and processing, and the address of the mobile device.


Once the redirector program is configured 50, the trigger points (or event triggers) are enabled at step 52. The program 12 then waits 56 for messages and signals 54 to begin the redirection process. A message could be an E-Mail message or some other user data item than may have been selected for redirection, and a signal could be a trigger signal, or could be some other type of signal that has not been configured as an event trigger. When a message or signal is detected, the program determines 58 whether it is one of the trigger events that has been configured by the user to signal redirection. If so, then at step 60 a trigger flag is set, indicating that subsequently received user data items (in the form of messages) that have been selected for redirection should be pushed to the user's mobile data communication device 24.


If the message or signal 54 is not a trigger event, the program then determines at steps 62, 68 and 66 whether the message is, respectively, a system alarm 62, an E-Mail message 64, or some other type of information that has been selected for redirection. If the message or signal is none of these three items, then control returns to step 56, where the redirector waits for additional messages 54 to act upon. If, however the message is one of these three types of information, then the program 12 determines, at step 68, whether the trigger flag has been set, indicating that the user wants these items redirected to the mobile device. If the trigger flag is set, then at step 70, the redirector 12 causes the repackaging system (E-Mail or TCP/IP) to add the outer envelope to the user data item, and at step 72 the repackaged data item is then redirected to the user's mobile data communication device 24 via LAN 14, WAN 18, wireless gateway 20 and wireless network 22. Control then returns to step 56 where the program waits for additional messages and signals to act upon. Although not shown explicitly in FIG. 4, after step 68, the program could, if operating in the preferred list mode, determine whether the sender of a particular data item is on the preferred list, and if not, then the program would skip over steps 70 and 72 and proceed directly back to step 56. If the sender was on the preferred list, then control would similarly pass to steps 70 and 72 for repackaging and transmission of the message from the preferred list sender.



FIG. 5 sets forth the method steps carried out by the user's mobile data communication device 24 in order to interface to the redirector program 12 of the present invention. At step 80 the mobile software is started and the mobile device 24 is configured to operate with the system of the present invention, including, for example, storing the address of the user's desktop system 10.


At step 82, the mobile device waits for messages and signals 84 to be generated or received. Assuming that the redirector software 12 operating at the user's desktop system 10 is configured to redirect upon receiving a message from the user's mobile device 24, at step 86, the user can decide to generate a command message that will start redirection. If the user does so, then at step 88 the redirection message is composed and sent to the desktop system 10 via the wireless network 22, through the wireless gateway 20, via the Internet 18 to the LAN 14, and is finally routed to the desktop machine 10. In this situation where the mobile device 24 is sending a message directly to the desktop system 10, no outer wrapper is added to the message (such as message C in FIGS. 1 and 2). In addition to the redirection signal, the mobile device 24 could transmit any number of other commands to control the operation of the host system, and in particular the redirector program 12. For example, the mobile 24 could transmit a command to put the host system into the preferred list mode, and then could transmit additional commands to add or subtract certain senders from the preferred list. In this manner, the mobile device 24 can dynamically limit the amount of information being redirected to it by minimizing the number of senders on the preferred list. Other example commands include: (1) a message to change the configuration of the host system to enable the mobile device 24 to receive and process certain attachments; and (2) a message to instruct the host system to redirect an entire data item to the mobile device in the situation where only a portion of a particular data item has been redirected.


Turning back to FIG. 5, if the user signal or message is not a direct message to the desktop system 10 to begin redirection (or some other command), then control is passed to step 90, which determines if a message has been received. If a message is received by the mobile, and it is a message from the user's desktop 10, as determined at step 92, then at step 94 a desktop redirection flag is set “on” for this message, and control passes to step 96 where the outer envelope is removed. Following step 96, or in the situation where the message is not from the user's desktop, as determined at step 92, control passes to step 98, which displays the message for the user on the mobile device's display. The mobile unit 24 then returns to step 82 and waits for additional messages or signals.


If the mobile device 24 determines that a message has not been received at step 90, then control passes to step 100, where the mobile determines whether there is a message to send. If not, then the mobile unit returns to step 82 and waits for additional messages or signals. If there is at least one message to send, then at step 102 the mobile determines whether it is a reply message to a message that was received by the mobile unit. If the message to send is a reply message, then at step 108, the mobile determines whether the desktop redirection flag is on for this message. If the redirection flag is not on, then at step 106 the reply message is simply transmitted from the mobile device to the destination address via the wireless network 22. If, however, the redirection flag is on, then at step 110 the reply message is repackaged with the outer envelope having the addressing information of the user's desktop system 10, and the repackaged message is then transmitted to the desktop system 10 at step 106. As described above, the redirector program 12 executing at the desktop system then strips the outer envelope and routes the reply message to the appropriate destination address using the address of the desktop system as the “from” field, so that to the recipient of the redirected message, it appears as though it originated from the user's desktop system rather than the mobile data communication device.


If, at step 102, the mobile determines that the message is not a reply message, but an original message, then control passes to step 104, where the mobile determines if the user is using the redirector software 12 at the desktop system 10, by checking the mobile unit's configuration. If the user is not using the redirector software 12, then the message is simply transmitted to the destination address at step 106. If, however, the mobile determines that the user is using the redirector software 12 at the desktop system 10, then control passes to step 110, where the outer envelope is added to the message. The repackaged original message is then transmitted to the desktop system 10 at step 106, which, as described previously, strips the outer envelope and routes the message to the correct destination. Following transmission of the message at step 106, control of the mobile returns to step 82 and waits for additional messages or signals.


Having described in detail the preferred embodiments of the present invention, including the preferred methods of operation, it is to be understood that this operation could be carried out with different elements and steps. This preferred embodiment is presented only by way of example and is not meant to limit the scope of the present invention which is defined by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method, operable at a mobile communication device, comprising: determining whether a message received over a wireless network is from a mail system associated with a user of the mobile communication device;upon determining that the message is from the mail system, setting a redirection flag at the mobile communication device to selectively control how a reply message generated at the mobile communication device is to be addressed; andremoving an outer envelope from the message prior to presenting the message to the user.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising upon determining that the message is not from the mail system, presenting the message to the user.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising transmitting a reply message to the mail system, wherein the reply message is in response to the received message and contains only a difference between the received message and any additional material generated by the user.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising upon receiving a reply message from the user, determining whether the redirection flag is on and responsive to determining that the redirection flag is on, wrapping the reply message in an outer envelope for transmission to the mail system and responsive to determining that the redirection flag is not on, transmitting the reply message to a recipient.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising upon receiving a new message from the user, determining whether the user is using redirector software and responsive to determining that the user is using redirector software, wrapping the new message in an outer envelope for transmission to the mail system and responsive to determining that the user is not using redirector software, transmitting the new message to a recipient.
  • 6. A mobile communication device, comprising: instructions configured to determine whether a message received over a wireless network is from a mail system associated with a user of the mobile communication device; andinstructions configured to set a redirection flag at the mobile communication device to selectively control how a reply message generated at the mobile communication device is to be addressed; andinstructions configured to remove an outer envelope from the message prior to presenting the message to the user upon determining that the message is from the mail system;wherein said instructions are stored in a non-transitory memory of the mobile communication device.
  • 7. The mobile communication device as recited in claim 6, further comprising instructions for presenting the message to the user upon determining that the message is not from the mail system.
  • 8. The mobile communication device as recited in claim 6, further comprising instructions for transmitting a reply message to the mail system, wherein the reply message is in response to the received message and contains only a difference between the received message and any additional material generated by the user.
  • 9. The mobile communication device as recited in claim 6, further comprising instructions, responsive to receiving a reply message from the user, for determining whether the redirection flag is on; and responsive to determining that the redirection flag is on, wrapping the reply message in an outer envelope for transmission to the mail system and responsive to determining that the redirection flag is not on, transmitting the reply message to a recipient.
  • 10. The mobile communication device as recited in claim 6, further comprising instructions, responsive to receiving a new message from the user, for determining whether the user is using redirector software; and responsive to determining that the user is using redirector software, wrapping the new message in an outer envelope for transmission to the mail system and responsive to determining that the user is not using redirector software, transmitting the new message to a recipient.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/087,623, filed on May 29, 1998.

US Referenced Citations (558)
Number Name Date Kind
1675422 Post Jul 1928 A
4106060 Chapman, Jr. Aug 1978 A
4417349 Hills et al. Nov 1983 A
4438433 Smoot et al. Mar 1984 A
4558454 Hills et al. Dec 1985 A
4644351 Zabarsky et al. Feb 1987 A
4695880 Johnson et al. Sep 1987 A
4697281 O'Sullivan Sep 1987 A
4713780 Schultz et al. Dec 1987 A
4763291 Schwaber Aug 1988 A
4768087 Taub et al. Aug 1988 A
4837798 Cohen et al. Jun 1989 A
4837800 Freeburg et al. Jun 1989 A
4845658 Gifford Jul 1989 A
4856047 Saunders Aug 1989 A
4928096 Leonardo et al. May 1990 A
4935954 Thompson et al. Jun 1990 A
4951044 Nelson et al. Aug 1990 A
4972457 O'Sullivan Nov 1990 A
4980907 Raith et al. Dec 1990 A
4994985 Cree et al. Feb 1991 A
5008926 Misholi Apr 1991 A
5040141 Yazima et al. Aug 1991 A
5043721 May Aug 1991 A
5058431 Karwacki et al. Oct 1991 A
5068916 Harrison et al. Nov 1991 A
5086502 Malcolm Feb 1992 A
5115326 Burgess et al. May 1992 A
5125021 Lebowitz Jun 1992 A
5127041 O'Sullivan Jun 1992 A
5128981 Tsukamoto et al. Jul 1992 A
5136291 Teague Aug 1992 A
5157660 Kuwahara et al. Oct 1992 A
5159592 Perkins Oct 1992 A
5177680 Tsukino et al. Jan 1993 A
5181200 Harrison Jan 1993 A
5210785 Sato et al. May 1993 A
5239466 Morgan et al. Aug 1993 A
5265033 Vajk et al. Nov 1993 A
5283887 Zachery Feb 1994 A
5285496 Frank et al. Feb 1994 A
5293250 Okumura et al. Mar 1994 A
5299255 Iwaki et al. Mar 1994 A
5307059 Connary et al. Apr 1994 A
5313582 Hendel et al. May 1994 A
5315635 Kane et al. May 1994 A
5333152 Wilber Jul 1994 A
5333266 Boaz et al. Jul 1994 A
5361397 Wright Nov 1994 A
5370566 Mitchell, Jr. et al. Dec 1994 A
5377354 Scannell et al. Dec 1994 A
5392390 Crozier Feb 1995 A
5406557 Baudoin Apr 1995 A
5410543 Seitz et al. Apr 1995 A
5416473 Dulaney, III et al. May 1995 A
5416842 Aziz May 1995 A
5418908 Keller et al. May 1995 A
5436960 Campana, Jr. et al. Jul 1995 A
5438011 Blalock et al. Aug 1995 A
5438611 Campana, Jr. et al. Aug 1995 A
5452356 Albert Sep 1995 A
5455864 Park Oct 1995 A
5457680 Trimmer et al. Oct 1995 A
5479472 Campana, Jr. et al. Dec 1995 A
5483466 Kawahara et al. Jan 1996 A
5487100 Kane Jan 1996 A
5493692 Theimer et al. Feb 1996 A
5495484 Self et al. Feb 1996 A
5510543 Fulmer et al. Apr 1996 A
5530740 Irribarren et al. Jun 1996 A
5548789 Nakanura Aug 1996 A
5557569 Smayling et al. Sep 1996 A
5557659 Hyde-Thomson Sep 1996 A
5559800 Mousseau et al. Sep 1996 A
5572528 Shuen Nov 1996 A
5577202 Padgett Nov 1996 A
5579472 Keyworth, II et al. Nov 1996 A
5588009 Will Dec 1996 A
5598536 Slaughter, III et al. Jan 1997 A
5603054 Goldstein et al. Feb 1997 A
5604491 Coonley et al. Feb 1997 A
5604788 Tett Feb 1997 A
5613108 Morikawa Mar 1997 A
5625670 Campana, Jr. et al. Apr 1997 A
5627829 Gleeson et al. May 1997 A
5630060 Tang et al. May 1997 A
5631945 Geluk May 1997 A
5631946 Campana, Jr. et al. May 1997 A
5633810 Mandal et al. May 1997 A
5638450 Robson Jun 1997 A
5666530 Clark et al. Sep 1997 A
5666553 Crozier Sep 1997 A
5673316 Auerbach et al. Sep 1997 A
5673322 Brockman et al. Sep 1997 A
5675507 Bobo, II Oct 1997 A
5675733 Williams Oct 1997 A
5701423 Crozier Dec 1997 A
5705995 Laflin et al. Jan 1998 A
5706211 Beletic et al. Jan 1998 A
5727159 Kikinis Mar 1998 A
5727202 Kucala Mar 1998 A
5729735 Meyering Mar 1998 A
5732074 Spaur et al. Mar 1998 A
5737531 Ehley Apr 1998 A
5742668 Pepe et al. Apr 1998 A
5742905 Pepe et al. Apr 1998 A
5745689 Yeager et al. Apr 1998 A
5748619 Meier May 1998 A
5751960 Matsunaga May 1998 A
5751971 Dobbins et al. May 1998 A
5754778 Shoujima May 1998 A
5754954 Ghomeshi et al. May 1998 A
5757901 Hiroshige May 1998 A
5758088 Bezairc et al. May 1998 A
5758150 Bell et al. May 1998 A
5758354 Huang et al. May 1998 A
5761416 Mandal et al. Jun 1998 A
5764639 Staples et al. Jun 1998 A
5764899 Eggleston et al. Jun 1998 A
5765170 Morikawa Jun 1998 A
5771353 Eggleston et al. Jun 1998 A
5771355 Kuzma Jun 1998 A
5781614 Brunson Jul 1998 A
5781901 Kuzma Jul 1998 A
5790790 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5790974 Tognazzini Aug 1998 A
5796806 Birckbichler Aug 1998 A
5797094 Houde et al. Aug 1998 A
5802275 Blonder Sep 1998 A
5812671 Ross, Jr. Sep 1998 A
5812773 Norin Sep 1998 A
5812819 Rodwin et al. Sep 1998 A
5813016 Sumimoto Sep 1998 A
5815081 Motohashi Sep 1998 A
5819172 Campana, Jr. et al. Oct 1998 A
5819284 Farber et al. Oct 1998 A
5822434 Caronni et al. Oct 1998 A
5826023 Hall et al. Oct 1998 A
5826062 Fake, Jr. et al. Oct 1998 A
5831664 Wharton et al. Nov 1998 A
5838252 Kikinis Nov 1998 A
5838926 Yamagishi Nov 1998 A
5844969 Goldman et al. Dec 1998 A
5850219 Kumomura Dec 1998 A
5850444 Rune Dec 1998 A
5850517 Verkler et al. Dec 1998 A
5852631 Scott Dec 1998 A
5854841 Nakata et al. Dec 1998 A
5862321 Lamming et al. Jan 1999 A
5862325 Reed et al. Jan 1999 A
5864669 Osterman et al. Jan 1999 A
5867660 Schmidt et al. Feb 1999 A
5878434 Draper et al. Mar 1999 A
5881235 Mills Mar 1999 A
5884033 Duvall et al. Mar 1999 A
5889845 Staples et al. Mar 1999 A
5890054 Logsdon Mar 1999 A
5900875 Haitani et al. May 1999 A
5903723 Beck et al. May 1999 A
5905777 Foladare et al. May 1999 A
5913040 Rakavy et al. Jun 1999 A
5915087 Hammond et al. Jun 1999 A
5917629 Hortensius et al. Jun 1999 A
5928329 Clark et al. Jul 1999 A
5937161 Mulligan et al. Aug 1999 A
5941596 See Aug 1999 A
5941954 Kalajan Aug 1999 A
5941956 Shirakihara et al. Aug 1999 A
5943426 Frith et al. Aug 1999 A
5944786 Quinn Aug 1999 A
5948066 Whalen et al. Sep 1999 A
5950219 Rao Sep 1999 A
5951636 Zerber Sep 1999 A
5953322 Kimball Sep 1999 A
5958006 Eggleston et al. Sep 1999 A
5959621 Nawaz et al. Sep 1999 A
5960406 Rasansky et al. Sep 1999 A
5961590 Mendez et al. Oct 1999 A
5964833 Kikinis Oct 1999 A
5966663 Gleason Oct 1999 A
5966714 Huang et al. Oct 1999 A
5968131 Mendez et al. Oct 1999 A
5969636 Parvulescu et al. Oct 1999 A
5973612 Deo et al. Oct 1999 A
5974180 Schwendeman Oct 1999 A
5974238 Chase, Jr. Oct 1999 A
5974449 Chang et al. Oct 1999 A
5978689 Tuoriniemi et al. Nov 1999 A
5978837 Foladare Nov 1999 A
5983073 Ditzik Nov 1999 A
5987100 Fortman et al. Nov 1999 A
5987508 Agraharam et al. Nov 1999 A
5995597 Woltz et al. Nov 1999 A
5999595 Shaffer et al. Dec 1999 A
6000000 Hawkins et al. Dec 1999 A
6002427 Kipust Dec 1999 A
6002769 McGough Dec 1999 A
6006274 Hawkins et al. Dec 1999 A
6009173 Sumner Dec 1999 A
6009455 Doyle Dec 1999 A
6014429 LaPorta et al. Jan 2000 A
6016478 Zhang et al. Jan 2000 A
6018762 Brunson et al. Jan 2000 A
6018782 Hartmann Jan 2000 A
6021433 Payne et al. Feb 2000 A
6023000 Fritz-Langhals et al. Feb 2000 A
6023700 Owens et al. Feb 2000 A
6023708 Mendez et al. Feb 2000 A
6034621 Kaufman Mar 2000 A
6035104 Zahariev Mar 2000 A
6044205 Reed et al. Mar 2000 A
6044275 Boltz et al. Mar 2000 A
6052442 Cooper et al. Apr 2000 A
6052563 Macko Apr 2000 A
6052735 Ulrich et al. Apr 2000 A
6058431 Srisuresh et al. May 2000 A
6067561 Dillon May 2000 A
6072862 Srinivasan Jun 2000 A
6073137 Brown et al. Jun 2000 A
6073165 Narasimhan et al. Jun 2000 A
6078826 Croft et al. Jun 2000 A
6078921 Kelley Jun 2000 A
6084969 Wright et al. Jul 2000 A
6085192 Mendez et al. Jul 2000 A
6085231 Agraharam et al. Jul 2000 A
6085232 Kikinis Jul 2000 A
6091951 Sturniolo et al. Jul 2000 A
6092114 Shaffer et al. Jul 2000 A
6092191 Shimbo et al. Jul 2000 A
6101531 Eggleston et al. Aug 2000 A
6112244 Moore et al. Aug 2000 A
6115394 Balachandran et al. Sep 2000 A
6115736 Devarakonda et al. Sep 2000 A
6115754 Landgren Sep 2000 A
6118856 Paarsmarkt et al. Sep 2000 A
6119167 Boyle et al. Sep 2000 A
6125281 Wells et al. Sep 2000 A
6125359 Lautzenheiser et al. Sep 2000 A
6125369 Wu et al. Sep 2000 A
6128739 Fleming, III Oct 2000 A
6130892 Short et al. Oct 2000 A
6131096 Ng et al. Oct 2000 A
6131116 Riggins et al. Oct 2000 A
6134432 Holmes et al. Oct 2000 A
6138089 Guberman Oct 2000 A
6138146 Moon et al. Oct 2000 A
6138158 Boyle et al. Oct 2000 A
6141690 Weiman Oct 2000 A
6144671 Perinpanathan et al. Nov 2000 A
6144997 Lamming et al. Nov 2000 A
6148405 Liao et al. Nov 2000 A
6151606 Mendez Nov 2000 A
6154839 Arrow et al. Nov 2000 A
6157318 Minata Dec 2000 A
6157630 Adler et al. Dec 2000 A
6157935 Tran et al. Dec 2000 A
6157941 Verkler et al. Dec 2000 A
6157950 Krishman Dec 2000 A
6161102 Yanagihara et al. Dec 2000 A
6161140 Moriya Dec 2000 A
6163274 Lindgren Dec 2000 A
6167379 Dean et al. Dec 2000 A
6170057 Inoue et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178331 Holmes et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182118 Finney et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185551 Birrell et al. Feb 2001 B1
6185603 Henderson et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195533 Tkatch et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199102 Cobb Mar 2001 B1
6202085 Benson et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203192 Fortman Mar 2001 B1
6205448 Kruglikov et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208996 Ben-Shachar et al. Mar 2001 B1
6219694 Lazaridis et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222942 Martin Apr 2001 B1
6233318 Picard et al. May 2001 B1
6233341 Riggins May 2001 B1
6237027 Namekawa May 2001 B1
6240088 Gayton et al. May 2001 B1
6243577 Elrefaie et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249291 Popp et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249805 Fleming Jun 2001 B1
6249820 Dobbins et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256666 Singhal Jul 2001 B1
6263201 Hashimoto et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272545 Flanagin et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275848 Arnold Aug 2001 B1
6275850 Beyda et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289105 Murota Sep 2001 B1
6289212 Stein et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292668 Alanara et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298232 Marin et al. Oct 2001 B1
6301608 Rochkind Oct 2001 B1
6304881 Halim et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311282 Nelson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6313734 Weiss et al. Nov 2001 B1
6314108 Ramasubramani et al. Nov 2001 B1
6314519 Davis et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324544 Alam et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324587 Trenbeath et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327046 Miyamoto et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330244 Swartz et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332156 Cho et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333973 Smith et al. Dec 2001 B1
6345298 Moriya Feb 2002 B1
6356937 Montville et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356956 Deo et al. Mar 2002 B1
6360210 Wallman Mar 2002 B1
6360221 Gough et al. Mar 2002 B1
6360272 Lincke et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363352 Dailey et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363412 Niwa et al. Mar 2002 B1
6370566 Discolo et al. Apr 2002 B2
6373946 Johnston Apr 2002 B1
6381634 Tello et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381645 Sassin Apr 2002 B1
6389455 Fuisz May 2002 B1
6389457 Lazaridis et al. May 2002 B2
6393421 Paglin May 2002 B1
6393463 Fuchigami May 2002 B1
6400958 Isomursu et al. Jun 2002 B1
6401112 Boyer et al. Jun 2002 B1
6401113 Lazaridis et al. Jun 2002 B2
6421707 Miller et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421781 Fox et al. Jul 2002 B1
6438585 Mousseau et al. Aug 2002 B2
6442589 Takahashi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449287 Leuca et al. Sep 2002 B1
6463463 Godfrey et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463464 Lazaridis et al. Oct 2002 B1
6470358 Beyda et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477243 Choksi et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487560 LaRue et al. Nov 2002 B1
6493007 Pang Dec 2002 B1
6505055 Kahn et al. Jan 2003 B1
6505214 Sherman et al. Jan 2003 B1
6546263 Petty et al. Apr 2003 B1
6580787 Akhteruzzaman et al. Jun 2003 B1
6591291 Gabber et al. Jul 2003 B1
6611358 Narayanaswamy Aug 2003 B1
6630883 Amin et al. Oct 2003 B1
6697458 Kunjibettu Feb 2004 B1
6701378 Gilhuly et al. Mar 2004 B1
6708221 Mendez et al. Mar 2004 B1
6738789 Multer et al. May 2004 B2
6742022 King et al. May 2004 B1
6757696 Multer et al. Jun 2004 B2
6763202 Maeda Jul 2004 B2
6766454 Riggins Jul 2004 B1
6775264 Kurganov Aug 2004 B1
6779019 Mousseau et al. Aug 2004 B1
6779022 Horstmann et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781962 Williams et al. Aug 2004 B1
6804707 Ronning Oct 2004 B1
6810408 Bates et al. Oct 2004 B1
6850219 Aoyama et al. Feb 2005 B2
6912398 Domnitz Jun 2005 B1
6941349 Godfrey et al. Sep 2005 B2
6983308 Oberhaus et al. Jan 2006 B1
7039679 Mendez et al. May 2006 B2
7116994 Hatch Oct 2006 B2
7171199 Rahman Jan 2007 B1
7209949 Mousseau et al. Apr 2007 B2
7209955 Major et al. Apr 2007 B1
7212811 Dowling et May 2007 B2
7225231 Mendez et al. May 2007 B2
7228383 Friedman et al. Jun 2007 B2
7243163 Friend et al. Jul 2007 B1
7266365 Ferguson et al. Sep 2007 B2
7284045 Marl et al. Oct 2007 B1
7287271 Riggins Oct 2007 B1
7295836 Yach et al. Nov 2007 B2
7317699 Godfrey et al. Jan 2008 B2
7321920 Washburn Jan 2008 B2
7346505 Sherwood Mar 2008 B1
7346690 Sinha et al. Mar 2008 B1
7363349 Friedman et al. Apr 2008 B2
7373517 Riggins May 2008 B1
7386588 Mousseau et al. Jun 2008 B2
7415486 Multer Aug 2008 B2
7444375 McConnell et al. Oct 2008 B2
7447743 Jordan, Jr. Nov 2008 B1
7487204 Asthana et al. Feb 2009 B2
7508777 Dowling Mar 2009 B2
7509376 Mousseau et al. Mar 2009 B2
7539665 Mendez May 2009 B2
7643818 Backholm et al. Jan 2010 B2
7650377 Knowles et al. Jan 2010 B2
7656275 Marui Feb 2010 B2
7668535 Conneely et al. Feb 2010 B2
7685244 Mousseau et al. Mar 2010 B2
7689721 Mousseau et al. Mar 2010 B2
7711362 Bumiller May 2010 B2
7734281 Ferguson et al. Jun 2010 B2
7739334 Ng et al. Jun 2010 B1
7752166 Quinlan et al. Jul 2010 B2
7761522 Shenfield et al. Jul 2010 B2
7769400 Backholm et al. Aug 2010 B2
7779151 Major et al. Aug 2010 B2
7788330 Goggin Aug 2010 B2
7801959 Lennie et al. Sep 2010 B1
7818033 Ferguson et al. Oct 2010 B2
7827281 Abbott et al. Nov 2010 B2
7836131 Tosey Nov 2010 B2
7836138 Tosey Nov 2010 B2
7870228 Chiu et al. Jan 2011 B2
7886005 Zahariev Feb 2011 B1
7912896 Wolovitz et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917505 van Gent et al. Mar 2011 B2
7929960 Martin et al. Apr 2011 B2
7945617 Knowles et al. May 2011 B2
7953802 Mousseau et al. May 2011 B2
7958198 Tosey Jun 2011 B2
8005469 Adams et al. Aug 2011 B2
8012219 Mendez et al. Sep 2011 B2
8024416 Ferguson et al. Sep 2011 B2
8041776 Friedman et al. Oct 2011 B2
8050661 Mousseau et al. Nov 2011 B2
8060064 Khoury et al. Nov 2011 B2
8060564 Mousseau et al. Nov 2011 B2
8063751 Marui Nov 2011 B2
8065436 Asthana et al. Nov 2011 B2
8069144 Quinlan et al. Nov 2011 B2
8116214 Backholm et al. Feb 2012 B2
8117344 Mendez et al. Feb 2012 B2
8134954 Godfrey et al. Mar 2012 B2
8150431 Wolovitz et al. Apr 2012 B2
8230026 Gilhuly et al. Jul 2012 B2
8259611 Godfrey et al. Sep 2012 B2
8291029 Asthana et al. Oct 2012 B2
8407305 Lazaridis et al. Mar 2013 B2
20010001552 Vong et al. May 2001 A1
20010004744 Lazaridis et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010005857 Lazaridis et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010005860 Lazaridis et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010005861 Mousseau et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010005864 Mousseau et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010009015 Mousseau et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010013071 Lazaridis et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010015977 Johansson Aug 2001 A1
20010029531 Ohta Oct 2001 A1
20010040693 Saito et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010042093 Shirai et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010045885 Tett Nov 2001 A1
20010054072 Discolo et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010054115 Ferguson et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020007376 Popp et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010748 Kobayashi et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020023213 Walker et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020039899 Rossman Apr 2002 A1
20020049818 Gilhuly et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049858 Frietas et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020059380 Biliris et al. May 2002 A1
20020065889 Macor May 2002 A1
20020069220 Tran Jun 2002 A1
20020099719 Schwitters et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020120696 Mousseau et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020143880 Sansone et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156896 Lin et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020183044 Blackwell et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194285 Mousseau et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030005066 Lazaridis et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018816 Godfrey et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030050046 Conneely et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050987 Lazaridis et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030074408 Clark et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030081621 Godfrey et al. May 2003 A1
20030088628 Lin May 2003 A1
20030088633 Chiu et al. May 2003 A1
20030097361 Huang et al. May 2003 A1
20030105864 Mulligan et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120805 Couts et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135618 Pisupati Jul 2003 A1
20030187938 Mousseau et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040024824 Ferguson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040073619 Gilhuly et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083271 Robert Tosey Apr 2004 A1
20040185877 Asthana et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040205106 Adler et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040252727 Mousseau et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040266441 Sinha et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050114458 Gottlieb May 2005 A1
20050149618 Cheng Jul 2005 A1
20050165914 Moore et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060069737 Gilhuly et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060095525 Mousseau et al. May 2006 A1
20060224750 Davies et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070016636 Boerries et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070088790 Shenfield et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070208942 May Sep 2007 A1
20070226367 Cai et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070243862 Coskun et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245026 Martin et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070288582 Major et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080043693 Mousseau et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080043694 Mousseau et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080044029 Gilhuly et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045193 Lazaridis et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045194 Gilhuly et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045216 Mousseau et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045253 Mousseau et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045266 Lazaridis et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045267 Hind et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045268 Ferguson et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046526 Lazaridis et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046527 Lazaridis et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046528 Gilhuly et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046529 Gilhuly et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046530 Lazaridis et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046534 Mousseau et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046535 Mousseau et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046591 Gilhuly et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046592 Gilhuly et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046594 Lazaridis et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051141 Ferguson et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080052341 Goggin Feb 2008 A1
20080052365 Mousseau et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080052409 Lazaridis et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080057964 Gilhuly et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080058013 Lazaridis et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080059657 Lazaridis et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080068995 Skog Mar 2008 A1
20080077707 Ferguson et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080089302 Godfrey et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080109521 Mousseau et al. May 2008 A1
20080109530 Ferguson et al. May 2008 A1
20080109560 Ferguson et al. May 2008 A1
20080150959 Marui Jun 2008 A1
20080182628 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080243276 Small Oct 2008 A1
20080261632 Hind et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080261633 Lazaridis et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263224 Gilhuly et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080288604 Major et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288605 Major et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090106380 Asthana et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090172079 Eggleston et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090178186 Truesdale Jul 2009 A1
20090181705 Yin Jul 2009 A1
20090204571 Shizuno Aug 2009 A1
20090207743 Huq et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090207745 Huq et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090209250 Huq Aug 2009 A1
20100003968 Cheng Jan 2010 A1
20100063352 Matsuura Mar 2010 A1
20100173658 Fan et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100225495 Marui Sep 2010 A1
20100227632 Bell et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250695 Shenfield et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100281153 Chiu et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110125856 Chu et al. May 2011 A1
20110202597 Mousseau et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120047215 Asthana et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120072512 Lazaridis et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120131224 Lazaridis et al. May 2012 A1
20120136980 Godfrey et al. May 2012 A1
20120303770 Godfrey et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120324031 Asthana et al. Dec 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (51)
Number Date Country
8184594 Jul 1995 AU
2511594 Nov 1999 CA
2213383 May 2001 CA
2333881 Dec 2002 CA
2356004 Jul 2003 CA
2356324 Jul 2003 CA
2367135 Nov 2005 CA
4440419 May 1996 DE
0077232 Apr 1983 EP
0128441 Dec 1984 EP
0128439 Jan 1988 EP
0777394 Jun 1994 EP
0732661 Sep 1996 EP
0 772 327 May 1997 EP
0932320 Jul 1997 EP
0 788 287 Aug 1997 EP
0793387 Sep 1997 EP
0803808 Oct 1997 EP
0825788 Feb 1998 EP
0838934 Apr 1998 EP
1096727 Mar 2006 EP
1675422 Jun 2006 EP
1096726 Jul 2009 EP
08-009053 Jan 1996 JP
08-070300 Mar 1996 JP
2008-288962 Nov 1996 JP
2008-298520 Nov 1996 JP
09-181723 Jul 1997 JP
10-063590 Mar 1998 JP
2006-232901 Sep 2006 JP
2007-175603 Jul 2007 JP
2008-137776 Jun 2008 JP
09-130424 Jun 2009 JP
2010-63590 Mar 2010 JP
10-074221 Apr 2010 JP
9919958 Apr 1994 WO
9430000 Dec 1994 WO
9619064 Jun 1996 WO
9703341 Aug 1997 WO
97 32251 Sep 1997 WO
9733421 Sep 1997 WO
9735402 Sep 1997 WO
97 41654 Nov 1997 WO
9744942 Nov 1997 WO
98 00787 Jan 1998 WO
9821911 May 1998 WO
9823108 May 1998 WO
9945484 Sep 1999 WO
0054072 Sep 2000 WO
0141472 Jun 2001 WO
2010074221 Jul 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (229)
Entry
Harry, Newton. “Newton's Telecom Dictionary”, Feb. 2006, CMP Books, 22nd ed., p. 740.
Canadian OA, Application No. 200810074204.4, Canadian IPO, Apr. 14, 2010, 7 pgs.
EP Communication Search Report, Application No. 00 128 447.0, European Patent Office, Oct. 8, 2001, 3 pgs.
EP Communication Examination Report, Application No. 00 128 447.0, European Patent Office, Feb. 1, 2005, 6 pgs.
EP Communication Examination Report, Application No. 00 128 447.0, European Patent Office, Sep. 9, 2005, 7 pgs.
EP Communication Examination Report, Application No. 00 128 447.0, European Patent Office, Sep. 18, 2006, 4 pgs.
EP Communication Examination Report, Application No. 00 128 447.0, European Patent Office, Jul. 13, 2007, 2 pgs.
EP Communication Examination Report, Application No. 00 128 447.0, European Patent Office, Feb. 16, 2009, 4 pgs.
EP Communication Examination Report, Application No. 00 128 447.0, European Patent Office, Sep. 7, 2009, 2 pgs.
EP Communication Search Report, Application No. 02 001 801.6, European Patent Office, Jul. 2, 2003, 6 pgs.
EP Communication Examination Report, Application No. 02 001 801.6, European Patent Office, May 27, 2005, 7 pgs.
EP Communication Examination Report, Application No. 02 001 801.6, European Patent Office, Feb. 11, 2008, 9 pgs.
EP Communication Examination Report, Application No. 02 001 801.6, European Patent Office, Nov. 28, 2008, 5 pgs.
EP Communication Examination Report, Application No. 02 001 801.6, European Patent Office, Oct. 4, 2010, 5 pgs.
US Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/277,294, USPTO, Mar. 23, 2006, 36 pgs.
US Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/277,294, USPTO, May 21, 2007, 17 pgs.
US Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/277,294, USPTO, Feb. 4, 2008, 12 pgs.
US Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/277,294, USPTO, Jul. 29, 2008, 13 pgs.
US Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/277,294, USPTO, Oct. 2, 2008, 3 pgs.
US Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/277,294, USPTO, Feb. 12, 2009, 13 pgs.
US Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/277,294, USPTO, Aug. 3, 2009, 13 pgs.
US Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/277,294, USPTO, Jan. 15, 2010, 35 pgs.
US Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/277,294, USPTO, Jul. 8, 2010, 32 pgs.
EPO, Communication Under Rule 71(3) EPC, Application No. 00128447.0, Mar. 11, 2011, 5 pgs.
JPO, Notice of Reasons for Rejection, Application No. 2010-124520, Aug. 23, 2011, 9 pgs.
Rukayawa, Practical Mobile Computing Course, Nikkei Communications, No. 246, May 19, 1997, p. 140-45, Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., Japan.
IP India, Hearing Held on Sep. 12, 2011: Decision, Application No. IN/PCT/2000/00350/DEL, Dec. 22, 2011, 2 pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Complaint, Document 1, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:11-cv-05345-KBF, Filed Aug. 1, 2011, 432 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Motion to Dismiss, Document 12, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:11-cv-05345-KBF, Filed Aug. 22, 2011, 29 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, Document 14, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:11-cv-05345-KBF, Filed Nov. 6, 2011, 32 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, Document 15, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:11-cv-05345-KBF, Filed Nov. 17, 2011, 14 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Letter Submission, Document 29, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:11-cv-05345-KBF, Filed Dec. 28, 2011, 7 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Document 35, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:11-cv-05345-KBF, Filed Jan. 24, 2012, 24 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment, Document 45, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:11-cv-05345-KBF, Filed Mar. 2, 2012, 29 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Complaint, Document 1, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:12-cv-00899-KBF, Filed Feb. 3, 2012, 416 Pgs.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,333,881, Apr. 26, 2001, 2 pgs.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,333,881, Jun. 21, 2001, 2 pgs.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,333,881, Mar. 1, 2002, 3 pgs.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,356,004, Oct. 16, 2001, 2 pgs.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,356,004, May 14, 2002, 2 pgs.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,356,324, Oct. 2, 2001, 1 pg.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,356,324, Oct. 16, 2001, 3 pgs.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,356,324, Feb. 14, 2002, 3 pgs.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,367,135, May 8, 2002, 2 pgs.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,367,135, Nov. 18, 2002, 2 pgs.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,367,135, Oct. 29, 2003, 5 pgs.
CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,367,135, May 25, 2004, 4 pgs.
ISA/PCT, International Search Report, Application No. PCT/AU97/00260, Jun. 4, 1997, 2 pgs.
ISA/PCT, International Search Report, Application No. PCT/CA99/00494, Feb. 28, 2000, 10 pgs.
SIPO, Rejection Decision of the Application, Application No. 200810074204.4, Apr. 14, 2010, 8 pgs.
SIPO, Rejection Decision of the Application, Application No. 200810074204.4, Dec. 21, 2010, 6 pgs.
US District Court Eastern District of Texas, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Doc. 198, Visto Corp. v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case No. 2:06-cv-00181-TJW-CE, dated Apr. 30, 2008, 39 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Eggleston's Motion 1 (Anticipation and Obviousness), Doc. 31, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Nov. 12, 2009, 124 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Lazaridis Substantive Motion 1 (For Lack of Written Description), Doc. 36, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Nov. 12, 2009, 32 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Lazaridis Substantive Motion 2 (For Judgment Based on Unpatentability Under 35 U.S.C. 112, Par. 2), Doc. 37, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Nov. 12, 2009, 59 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Lazaridis Substantive Motion 3 (For Judgement Based on Unpatentability Under 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103), Doc. 38, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Nov. 12, 2009, 43 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Lazaridis Substantive Motion 4 (To Undesignate Claims as Corresponding to the Count), Doc. 39, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Nov. 12, 2009, 24 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Eggleston's Opposition 1, Doc. 68, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Feb. 26, 2010, 59 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Eggleston's Opposition 2, Doc. 69, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Feb. 26, 2010, 63 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Eggleston's Opposition 3, Doc. 70, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Feb. 26, 2010, 78 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Eggleston's Opposition 4, Doc. 71, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Feb. 26, 2010, 54 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Lazardis Opposition 1, Doc. 73, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Feb. 26, 2010, 189 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Lazardis Opposition 2, Doc. 74, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Feb. 26, 2010, 93 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Declaration of Brad Karp, Doc. 274, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Jun. 7, 2010, 40 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Declaration of Dr. Gary S. Tjaden, Doc. 192, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Jun. 7, 2010, 62 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, First Declaration of John Friend, Doc. 170, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Jun. 7, 2010, 175 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Fourth Declaration of John Friend, Doc. 323, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Jun. 7, 2010, 60 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Second Declaration of Brad Karp, Doc. 306, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Jun. 7, 2010, 20 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Substitute Declaration of Andrew M. Seybold, Doc. 196, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Jun. 7, 2010, 6 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Substitute Second Declaration of John Friend, Doc. 209, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Jun. 7, 2010, 13 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Decision—Motions—Bd. R. 125(b), Doc. 342, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, dated May 2, 2011, 21 pgs.
BPAI USPTO, Judgment—Merits—Bd. R. 127, Doc. 343, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, dated May 2, 2011, 3 pgs.
JPO, Notice of Final Rejection, Application No. 2008-130152, Jul. 9, 2010, 3 pgs.
SIPO, Rejection Decision of the Application, Application No. 2008100742044, May 6, 2011, 10 pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Opinion and Order of the Court, Document 71, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:11-cv-05345-KBF, Filed May 16, 2012, 20 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Notice of Motion, Document 14, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:12-cv-00899-KBF, Filed Jun. 14, 2012, 2 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Memorandum of Law of Defendant Research in Motion Limited in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, Document 15, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:12-cv-00899-KBF, Filed Jun. 14, 2012, 32 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Declaration of Michael S. Feldberg, Document 16, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:12-cv-00899-KBF, Filed Jun. 14, 2012, 2 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Plaintiff Tahir Mahmood's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Research in Motion Limited's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, Document 18, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:12-cv-00899-KBF, Filed Jun. 28, 2012, 32 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Reply Memorandum of Law of Defendant Research in Motion Limited in Further Support of Its Motion to Dismiss, Document 19, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:12-cv-00899-KBF, Filed Jul. 9, 2012, 15 Pgs.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Opinion and Order, Document 22, Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd., Case 1:12-cv-00899-KBF, Filed Oct. 25, 2012, 15 Pgs.
USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/201,362, Apr. 19, 2012, 13 pgs.
USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/359,586, Jun. 20, 2012, 21 pgs.
JPO, Office Action, Application No. 2011-255370, Nov. 22, 2012, 4 pgs.
SIPO, Details of Reexamination Notification, Application No. 200810074204, Mar. 7, 2013, 6 pgs.
SIPO, 3rd Office Action, Application No. 200810074204.4, Apr. 9, 2014, 3 pgs.
USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/359,586, Jun. 13, 2013, 10 pgs.
SIPO, Notification of Completion of Formalities for Registration, Application No. 200810074204.4, Jul. 29, 2014, 2 pgs.
SIPO, Notification of Grant of Rights for Invention Patent, Application No. 200810074204.4, Jul. 29, 2014, 2 pgs.
“3Com PalmPilot Gets Wireless Link for E-Mail” Spooner John G. PC Week Dec. 8, 1997.
“Have Your Pager Call My Pager”, Sullivan Kristina B., PC Week, Dec. 8, 1997.
“Motorola's ‘Marco’ Wireless Communicator,” http://www.msu.edu/-luckie/gallery/marco.htm, Aug. 6, 2001 (2 pgs.).
“Motorola's ‘Marco’ Wireless Communicator,” http://www.msu.edu/-luckie/gallery/marco.htm, Jun. 14, 2001, 3 pages.
“SAM™ integrates E-mail, Alpha Paging, Fax, and more!”, SAM System for Automated Messages (10 pgs.).
“Vendor-Independent Messaging Interface Functional Specification”; Version 1.00; Copyright © 1991, 1992 by Apple Computer, Inc., Borland International, Inc., Lotus Development Corporation, and Novell, Inc.; 183 pages.
“Marco' Wireless Communicator,” http://www.Fmsu.edu/-luck le/oallerv/marco.htm, Jun. 14, 2001 (3 DOS.).
AirMobile (Software for Lotus cc: Mail Wireless, Communication Server Guide, V.1.1., Motorola, 1995, 24 pgs.
AirMobile, Software for Lotus cc: Mail Wireless, Communication Client Guide, V.1.0., Motorola, 1995, 47 pgs.
Aldrich et al. MAPI Developers Forum post “Notification when posting a message to Exchange”; May 1997.
Alikoski et al.; Google Groups post “IMAPIAdviseSink object?”; Jan. 1996.
Allman, Eric, Sendmail—An Internetwork Mail Router, Jul. 29, 1991, 13 pgs.
Amundsen, Michael C., MAPI, SAPI, and TAPI Developer's Guide, 1996, pp. 26-28, Sams Publishing, USA.
Arnum, Eric, “the universal mailbox arrives . . . soft of”, Business Communications Review, May 1996, v26, n5.
Comerford, “Handhelds Duke It Out for the Internet,” Wireless Internet, s. 35-38 and 41, Aug. 2000.
Behr “Handheld Solutions”, lnformationweek, Manhasset; Oct. 27, 1997 pp. 106-113.
Bell South, ‘Simon Says “Here's How!, Simon Mobile Communications Made Simple Users Manual”,’ IBM, 1st Ed., Feb. 1994, 49 pgs.
Binder et al., The ALOHAnet Menehune, v2, ALOHA System Technical Report, Sep. 1974, 112 pgs., USA.
Bixby, Mark, Announce: Aliaserv, v1 .0, Self-serve E-mail Aliases, Google Groups Discussion: comp.mail.misc, Mar. 24, 1994, 3 pgs., http://groups.google.com/group/comp.mail.misc/browse—thread/thread/d391285c06284025/432b 1f764674 7 431.
Black, Lauren, et al., “Personal Digital Assistants,” Macworld Reviews, Aug. 6, 2001 (5 pgs.)
BlackBerry Technical White Paper, Research in Motion Ltd., Version 1.0, 1998-1999.
Taylor et al. “Internetwork Mobility The CDPD Approach” , Jun. 11, 1996.
BPAI USPTO, Third Declaration of John Friend, Doc. 286, Lazaridis v. Eggleston, Interference No. 105,700, filed Jun. 7, 2010, 62 pgs.
Briere, Daniel et al., “One Mailbox, Just Like Old Times”, Network World, vol. 14, issue 16, p. 21 (Apr. 21, 1997).
Burch et al., Motorola Envoy Press Clippings, Google Groups Discussion: comp.sys.pen, Mar. 7-17, 1994, 10 pgs., http:// groups.google.com/group/comp.sys. pen/browse—threadlthread/21e7f8890df6d64 7/ a09454f4a36731 01.
Canadian Federal Court, Pinpoint Citations in Satisfaction of the Order of Madam Prothonotary Tabib Dated Dec. 19, 2006, Research in Motion Ltd. v. Visto Corporation, Case No. T-1105-06, filed Jan. 31, 2007, 31 pgs.
Canadian Federal Court, Statement of Defence and Counterclaim by Defendant Visto Corporation, Research in Motion Ltd. v. Visto Corporation, Case No. T-1105-06, filed Nov. 15, 2006, 31 pgs.
Carthy et al.; MAPI Developers Forum post “MAPI Notification”; Apr. 12, 1996.
Cheshire, Stuart, et al., “Internet Mobility 4 X 4.” Computer Science Department, Stanford University; pp. 1-12, Aug. 1996.
Clark et al., PCMAIL: A Distributed Mail System for Personal Computers, RFC 984, May 1986, 30 pgs., Internet Engineering Task Force, Network Working Group.
Claxton, “Messaging API's for Voice Networks,” Telecommunications, pp. 116-120, 1998.
Cohen, Stephane, MAPI Notification, MAPI Developers Forum Post, Apr. 17, 1996, 2 pgs.
Costales et al, “Help for UNIX System Administrators—Sendmail,” O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sep. 1994, 877 pgs.
Compaq, Aero 2100 Series Color Palm-size PC Reference Guide, Aug. 1999, 193 pgs, 2d ed., Compaq Computer Corporation, USA.
DTS Wireless Website located at D.R.L. http://www.dtswireless.com.
Crocker, David H., “Standard for the format of ARPA Internet Text Messages,” Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, Aug. 13, 1982, 50 pgs.
Dawson et al., iCalendar Message-Based Interoperability Protocol (iMIP), RFC 2447, Nov. 1998, 4 pgs., Internet Engineering Task Force, Network Working Group.
Declaration of David A. Keeney regarding SAM System, pp. 1-33 (Sep. 3, 2002).
Derose, James F., The Wireless Data Handbook, 1994, pp. 280-85, Quantum Publishing, Inc., USA.
Dewey, Barney, “Communications Strategies for Newton 2.0,” Newton Technology Journal, 1 page, Jun. 1996.
Diehl et al., Need to Rewrite from Field on Outgoing Mail, Google Groups Discussion: comp.mail.sendmail, May 23-24, 1996, 2 pgs.
Dilworth et al., Wireless as an Internet On-Ramp & Local Loop By-Pass, COOK Report on Internet Protocol, Technology, Economics, Policy, accessed Dec. 12, 2006, 45 pgs.
Dunker et al, Mobile Vision User Manual, CE Software, Inc., 1st Ed., 1995, 49 pgs.
Dunker, “CE Software Announces MobileVision,” CE Software, Inc., Jan. 4, 1995, 2 pgs.
Hakima, Enterprise Solutions for Email Overload, Founder Publications, http://www.amikanow.com/corporte/publications.htm, Aug. 6, 2001, 9 pgs.
EP Search Report, Application No. 01 112 396.5, European Patent Office, Sep. 28, 2001, 6 pgs.
EPO Opposition Division, Decision Rejecting the Opposition (Art. 101 (2) EPC), Research in Motion Limited v. Visto Corporation, Opposition re EP 1096727, May 14, 2009, 10 pgs.
EPO Opposition Division, Opposition Letter by Visto Corporation, Research in Motion Limited v. Visto Corporation, Opposition re EP 1096727, Jan. 12, 2009, 3 pgs.
EPO Opposition Division, Opposition to EP 1096727 of Research in Motion UK Limited by Visto Corporation, Research in Motion Limited v. Visto Corporation, Opposition re EP 1096727, Dec. 21, 2006, 39 pgs.
EPO Opposition Division, Reply to Opposition, Research in Motion Limited v. Visto Corporation, Opposition re EP 1096727, Aug. 8, 2007, 32 pgs. D.
European High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Patents Court, Statement of Defence and Counterclaim, Particulars of Infringement, and Grounds of Invalidity, Research in Motion UK Limited v. Visto Corporation, Case No. HC-06-004227, filed Feb. 2, 2007, 77 pgs.
European High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Patents Court, Witness Statement of Jeanie Treichel, Research in Motion UK Limited v. Visto Corporation, Case No. HC-06-004227, dated Dec. 29, 2007, 4 pgs.
Feibus “A Desktop in Your Palm”, Information week, Aug. 25, 1997, pp. 65ff.
Frezza, Bill, “PDA, PDA, Wherefore Art Thou, PDA?”, Freewire, Aug. 6, 2001 (6 pgs.).
Funk, Andrew, A Personal Packet Radio Mailbox Using Roserver: Automated Packet Radio for Individuals, 8th ARRL Amateur Radio Computer Networking Conference, Oct. 7, 1989, 18 pgs., USA.
Gadol et al., Nomadic Tenets: A User's Perspective, SMLI Technical Report, Jun. 1994, 16 pgs., Sun Microsystems Laboratories, Inc., USA.
Garbee, Bdale, New Release of KA9Q Internet Package, Sep. 12, 1987, 5 pgs.
Gifford, David K., et al., “An Architecture for Large Scale Information Systems,” ACM, pp. 161-170 (1985).
Gifford, David K., et al., “The Application of Digital Broadcast Communication to Large Scale Information Systems.” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. SAC-3, No. 3, pp. 457-467 (May 1985).
Gerber, Barry, Mastering Microsoft Exchange Server 5, 2d, 1997, pp. 16-22, 48-67, 541-44, Sybex, Inc., USA.
General Magic, Inc., Corporate Backgrounder, 2001 (2 pgs.), http://www.generalmagic.com/company/company—history.shtml, Jun. 2001.
Goldszmidt et al., ShockAbsofber. A TCP Connection Router, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference Record, Nov. 3-8, 1997, pp. 1919-1923, vol. 3, USA.
IBM, Portable Terminal User's Guide, Jun. 1985, 277 pgs., 3d ed.
Iellimo, Albert, PDAs the Next Generation, Network World Fusion—Press Room, Mar. 13, 1995, 8 pgs.
Inouye, Jon et al., “System Support for Mobile Multimedia Applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Workshop on Network And Operating System Support For Digital Audio And Video, May 19-21, 1997, pp. 135-146.
Johnson, D.: Scalable Support for Transparent Mobile Host Intemetworking,• Wireless Networks, The Journal of Mobile Communication, Computation and Information, vol. 1, No. 3, Oct. 1995, pp. 311-321.
Johnson, David B., “Scalable and Robust Internetwork Routine for Mobile Hosts,” 14th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Poznan Poland, Jun. 21-24, IEEE, 1994, 12 pgs.
Johnson, David B., “Ubiquitous Mobile Host Internet working,” Fourth Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems, pp. 85-90, Oct. 14-15, 1993.
Johnson, David B., “Mobile Host Intemetworking Using IP Loose Source Routing,” School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 1-14, Feb. 1993.
Knowles, Brad, Frequently Asked Questions, Google Groups Discussion: comp.mail.sendmail, Mar. 24, 1997, 47 pgs.
Kramer, Matt, Wireless E-mail services gain Windows clients, PC Week, Apr. 17, 1995, v12, n15.
Krebs, Jay, Portable Computer and Host Talk Over Radio-Frequency Link, Electronic, pp. 142-145 (Aug. 25, 1983).
Kuehn, Carl, SAM: More than Email, Southwest Computer & Business Equipment, Feb. 1990, 2 pgs., vol. VII, No. 2, USA.
Lavana, Hemang, et al., Internet-Based Workflows: A Paradigm for Dynamically Reconfigurable Desktop Environments, Group 97, pp. 204-213, 1997.
Levitt, Jason, Moving Mail with No Strings Attached: Users Love Wireless Electronicmail's Convenience, Jan. 24, 1994, 4 pgs., Information Access Company, USA.
Lightford, “Secure Comm for Windows and Secure Link for Windows for CC: Mail Mobile,” Sep. 16, 1994, Business Wire Sec. 1, pp. 3.
Long, Geoff, The PAN Mongolia Experience, Dec. 6, 1996, 3 pgs., International Development Research Centre, Canada.
Lucent Technologies, Bell Labs Technical Journal, vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 152-163, Summer 1997.
Moody's Investors Service, Socket Communications Inc.—History & Debt, Investex Report No. 3240276.
Mosher, Microsoft Exchange User's Handbook, Duke Press, 1997, pp. 547-549.
Motorola Operating Instructions for Your “PMR 2000” Series Display Radio Pagers Personal Message Center (2000) (7 pages).
Motorola PMR 2000 Personal Message Receiver POCSAG (CCIR Radio Paging Code #1) (1986) (6 pages).
Motorola, Motorola Announces New Solutions to Provide Consumers with Wireless Access to Personal and Enterprise E-mail Accounts, Pressi.com, Mar. 21, 2001, 4 pgs. D.
Motorola, Operating Instructions for Your “PMR 2000” Series Display Radio Pagers Personal Message Center, 1987, 7 pgs., Motorola, USA.
Motorola, Inc., emailVClient, “What is the emialVClient plug-in?” 2001 (4 pages).
Nelson, M.: “Wireless Data Services: Here and Now,” PDA Developers 2.6, Nov./Dec. 1994, 3 pages.
Newsletter, Battery Friendly Bulletin, vol. 1, Issue 3, pp. 1-7 and unnumbered page, 1999.
Dunker, News Release, “CE Software Announces MobileVision,” Editorial Contacts, CE Software, Inc., 1995, 3 pages.
Dunker & Lee, “CE Software Ships Mobile Vision,” Jun. 20, 1995 3 pages (New Release).
Motorola—“Motorola Announces Pagewriter 250, The World's Smallest Pager with Full Keyboard”, Feb. 27, 1997 (2 pgs.).
“Motorola Rings in 1995 with the Launch of the Marco® Wireless Communicator,” Jan. 4, 1995 (4 pgs.) News Release.
E-Mail Merges With Voice Through Infinite Technologies, Voice Technology & Services News, May 26, 1998, Newsletter.
Vodapage: Vodapage demos increasing convergence of pagers and mobile communications at TMA 29, M2 Presswire, Nov. 28, 1996. Newsletter.
O'Brien, Jim, Evaluation: Ericsson GE's Co.'s Viking Express Includes Cellular Modern, Palmtop Computer, Communications Software, Electronic Mail Service, Hardware Review Online, Dec. 1992, 4 pgs., ZDNet.
O'Malley, Chris, Simonizing the PDA, BYTE.com, Dec. 1994, 9 pgs., CMP Media LLC, USA.
Newton Reference, Communications, Software, Clay Irving, NY 1996-1997(4 pgs.); http://www.panix.com/-clay/newton/query.cgi?communications+comm—software; retrieved Jul. 9, 2001.
Padwick, et al., “Special Edition Using Microsoft Outlook 97,” 1997, Que Corporation, pp. 250-251, 353-367.
Lynch, Paul—PC Pro Issue 31: Realworld Computing: PDA Column, Jul. 30, 1997 (7 pgs.)
Pegasus Email Settings, ABSnet Internet Services, Inc. 4 pgs; http//.www.abs.net/tech-support/email/Pegasus.htm.
Perkins, C.: “RFC 2002—IP Mobility Support,” IBM, Oct. 1996, 61 pages.
Perkins, Charles, “IMHP: A Mobile Host Protocol for the Internet,” Computer Networks and ISDN System, vol. 27, pp. 479-491, 1994.
Perkins, Charles E. et al., “Mobility Support in 1Pv6,” International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Nov. 11-12, 1996, pp. 27-37.
Press Release, “Apple Agrees to License Newton Technology to Schlumberger, Digital Ocean,” Nov. 3, 1995 (3 pgs.)
Press Detail, “Extended Systems and Motorola Bring Short-Range Wireless to the Paging E-volution,” Jan. 13, 2000 (3 pgs.)
Press Detail, “3Com Corporation Licenses Bluetooth Technology from Extended S stems,” Feb. 22, 2000 (2 pgs.)
RadioMail Ships Wireless E-mail Software: Product Announcement: Brief Article, LAN Magazine, No. 4, vol. 10, Apr. 1, 1995, p. 162, Information Access Company, USA.
Redmond, Tony, Microsoft Exchange ServerV5.0: Planning, Design, and Implementation, 1997, pp. 70-77, Digital Press, USA.
Reich, Richard, UnixWorld; Sendmail V8: A (Smoother) Engine Powers Network Email, accessed Nov. 12, 2006, http://www.networkcomputing.com/shared/prinArticle.jhtml?article+/unixworld/tutor . . . 16 pgs.
Reiter, Alan A., “Focus on Technology,” Telocator (Jan. 1990) (4 pgs.)
RIM, Information About BlackBerry Wireless Email to Plan for Disaster Recovery, BlackBerry Technical Advisory No. STAE-0002, Aug. 8, 2000, 4 pgs., Research In Motion Limited.
RIM, Technical White Paper: BlackBerry Exchange Edition Version 2.0: RIM 950 & 957 Wireless Handheld, 2000, 16 pgs., Research In Motion Limited. D.
Roubelat, Jean Paul, Server and BBS Software for the Packet Radio, Feb. 6, 1993, 173 pgs.
SAM Reference Manual, System for Automated Messages (Sep. 1989), 182 pages.
SAM System for Automated Messages User's Manual (1988) (17 pgs.).
SAMpage Manual, version 2.0, TeckNow! (Feb. 1990) 49 pages.
Sbihli, Scott, The Envoy 150: Wireless from the Start, PDA Developers 4.6, Nov.-Dec. 1996.
Schoettle, Bob, “IP-Address Management on LANs,” Byte, pos. 199-200, Feb. 1996.
Seybold, Andrew M., Using Wireless Communications in Business, 1994, 74 pgs, Van Nostrand-Reinh, Thomson Publishing Company, International. D.
Siewiorek et al., Networks, Computer Structures: Principles and Examples, pp. 387-428, 1982, McGraw-Hill, Inc., USA.
Bell South, Simon Says “Here's How!”, Simon Mobile Communications Made Simple, Users Manual, Feb. 1994, 50 pgs., IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA.
Strom, David, Mobile Computing Comes of Age, Network World, 1995, 4 pgs.
Takahashi et al., “Communication Method With Data Compression and Encryption for Mobile Computing Environment,” Inet 96 Proceedings, 1996, from www.isoc.org/inet96/proceedings/a6/a6—2.htm, pp. 11.
Tanenbaum, Andrew, Network Layer: Mobile IP, Computer Networks, 1996, Section 5.5.8, 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall PTR, USA.
TekNow! Inc., “SAM—System for Automated Messages,” SAM Reference Manual, Sep. 1989 Ed., 99 pgs.
United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division: Good Technology, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd., et al., Case No. C02-2348 MJJ, Plaintiff Good Technology, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent LR. 3-3 and Response Under Patent LR. 3-4, Jan. 16, 2004, 42 pages.
United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division: Good Technology, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd., et al., Case No. 3:02-2348 MJJ, Plaintiff Good Technology, Inc.' s. 93 pages pulled Oct. 9, 2008.
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Excerpts of Research in Motion Limited's and Research in Motion Corporation's Third Amended Answer, Defenses and Counterclaims, Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited, Case No. 2:06-cv•00181 •TJWCE, filed Jun. 25, 2008, 6 pgs.
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Research in Motion's Claim Construction Brief Regarding the RIM Patents, Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited, Case No. 2:06-cv-00181-TJW-CE, filed Sep. 17, 2007, 32 pgs.
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Declaration of David A. Keeney, NTP, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd., Case No. 3:01-cv-00767, filed Sep. 3, 2002, 35 pgs.
USPTO, Order Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination [of U.S. Pat. No. 6,219,694], U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,285, Dec. 16, 2008, 13 pgs.
USPTO, Order Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination [of U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,457], U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,286, Dec. 16, 2008, 12 pgs.
USPTO, Replacement Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,457, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,286, Sep. 25, 2008, 35 pgs.
USPTO, Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,219,694, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,285, Sep. 18, 2008, 74 pgs.
Visto Corporation Launch Tour Presentation, Oct. 1997, 18 pgs., USA.
Wada et al., Mobile Computing Environment Based on Internet Packet Fonvarding, USENIX, Jan. 25-29, 1993, pp. 503-517, USA.
Hawaleshka, “The Web in Your Pocket,” Maclean's, May 15, 2000, 3 pages; wysiwgy://12/http://proquest.umi.com/pq..Fmt+4&Deli—1&Mtd=1&Idx=13&Sid=3&RQT=30-9, retrieved Oct. 4, 2001.
Wireless Packet Network Helps Red Cross Keep Communicating: IBM's 9075 Pcradio, Communications News, Apr. 1993, 3 pgs., Nelson Publishing.
Woods et al., Alias Updates, Google Groups Discussion: comp.mail.sendmail, Apr. 24-27, 1990, 4 pgs., Sendmail, Inc., USA, http://groups.google.com/group/comp.mail.sendmail/browse—thread/thread/2a29648e0774c686/5213a85ce6d69c45.
WyndMail for Windows CE Archived Information, Feb. 9, 1997, 8 pgs., WyndCommunications, USA, available at http:// web.archive.org/web/19970209082529/www.wynd.com/ce/cefaq.html.
“Yeom, Hoen Y., et al., ““IP Multiplexing by Transparent Port-Address Translator,”” Proceedings of the Tenth USENIX System Administration Conference, pp. 113-122, Sep. 29-Oct. 4, 1996”.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080052409 A1 Feb 2008 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 09782129 Feb 2001 US
Child 10277294 US
Parent 09087623 May 1998 US
Child 09782129 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10277294 Oct 2002 US
Child 11926394 US