The following disclosure is related to biologic data collection and, more specifically, storage and dissemination of biologic characteristics data.
When conducting testing on biologic materials, the biologic material may have various uses beyond the test, and data on such can be valuable at a later time. Therefore, what is needed is a system and method for storage of data on particular biologic samples and for providing access to same.
In one aspect thereof, a system for providing variable function medical tests is provided. The system comprises a mobile device application configured to provide a plurality of selectable medical test functions, a server configured to receive information from the mobile device application regarding test results from a test performed using a testing device, wherein the testing device includes an alignment target disposed on the testing device and a plurality of immunoassay test strips, receive an image of the testing device from the mobile device application, determine RGB values for a plurality of pixels of the image, normalize the RGB values into a single value, compare the single value to a control value stored on the server, and provide a risk indicator, wherein the risk indicator indicates a likelihood of a presence of a medical condition.
In another aspect thereof, a method for providing variable function medical tests is provided. The method comprises providing by a mobile device application a plurality of selectable medical test functions, receiving information from the mobile device application regarding test results from a test performed using a testing device, wherein the testing device includes an alignment target disposed on the testing device and a plurality of immunoassay test strips, receiving at the server an image of the testing device from the mobile device application, determining by the server RGB values for a plurality of pixels of the image, normalizing by the server the RGB values into a single value, comparing by the server the single value to a control value stored on the server, and providing by the server a risk indicator, wherein the risk indicator indicates a likelihood of a presence of a medical condition.
For a more complete understanding, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings in which:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numbers are used herein to designate like elements throughout, the various views and embodiments of an arbovirus indicative birth defect risk test are illustrated and described, and other possible embodiments are described. The figures are not necessarily drawn to scale, and in some instances the drawings have been exaggerated and/or simplified in places for illustrative purposes only. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate the many possible applications and variations based on the following examples of possible embodiments.
Referring now to
The biologic analyte 106, after coming into contact with the sample pad 104, begins to migrate across the strip 100 by capillary action, coming into contact with other sections of the strip 100. A particle conjugate pad 108 is disposed between the sample pad 104 and a test line 110. The conjugate pad 108 may contain various reagents associated with a particular antigen, such as a virus, allergen, or bacteria, the reagents being items such antibodies, enzymes, or other reagents needed to diagnose the particular condition. The reagent in the conjugate pad 108 may be conjugated with particles of materials such as colloid gold or colored latex beads. As the analyte 106 migrates through the conjugate pad 108, antibodies present in the sample analyte 106 complex with the reagents in the conjugate pad 108, thereby creating an immune complex that will migrate to the test zone or test line 110.
The test line 110 (T) may be precoated with the relevant antigen in question, i.e., a virus, allergen, or bacteria, for the detection of antibodies associated with the particular antigen. The immune complex created when the analyte 106 passes through the conjugate pad 108 is captured onto the antigen contained on the test line 110. This may create a qualitative response on the strip where the test line 110 is located, such as a colored response. In some embodiments, the test line 110 may not be a line, but may be other shapes or symbols, such as a plus sign. If no antigen-anti-antigen complexes are present in the analyte, no reaction occurs in the test line 110 and a qualitative response will not occur.
After passing through the test line 110, the analyte migrates further along the strip to reach a control line 112, where excess anti-antibody-colloidal gold or latex conjugates get bound. A qualitative response may be shown at the control line 112, indicating that the sample has adequately migrated across the testing membrane or substrate as intended. It will be understood that the control line 112 is not necessarily needed to perform the test, and may be eliminated entirely, but the control line 112 does provide a comparative example for a user reading the test. For example, the control line 112, in embodiments where a colored qualitative response is provided, may appear as an overly saturated color, such as a dark or bright saturated red, once the sample reaches the control line 112. This saturated color may be used as a comparison against the qualitative response shown on the test line 110. For example, if the qualitative response shown on the test line 110 is a much lighter red than that on the test line 110, it may be that very little reaction occurred at the test line. Of course, if no response is shown at all at the test line 110, no reaction has occurred. If the qualitative response at the test line 110 is of a similar saturation to the control line 112, a strong reaction is indicated.
The strip 100 may not be a continuous substrate. Rather, the various sections of the strip 100 may be separate from each other, but all adhered to the backing 102. As shown in
Several Flow Immune Assays have been directed toward identifying proteins, molecules of interest, and even immunoglobulins IgG, IgA, and IgM. IgE is an antibody (immunoglobulin E) that is normally present in the blood freely circulating until it moves into the tissue where it is bound to mast cells through the receptor FcERI (F-C-epsilon-R-one) otherwise known as the high affinity IgE receptor. There is a small amount of IgE bound to IgE receptors (high and low affinity receptors) on basophils, eosinophils, and other cells in the blood and tissues.
Many assay systems are geared toward the detection of infectious proteins. All of the aforementioned tests use a non-human antibody—usually IgG type—e.g., goat IgG antibody directed against a protein of interest to detect the protein of interest from the sample (blood, urine, saliva, sweat, etc.). This antibody complexes with protein of interest and forms a complex that travels across the membrane until it reaches the test zone. In the test zone there is an IgG type antibody directed against IgG from that species of animal. As further described herein, the present detecting apparatus and method use human (patient/consumer-derived) antibodies from the sample and the test zone that contains a humanized antibody directed against the protein of interest that is preconjugated to a detecting substance that results in a visual change.
Summary of Target Antigen:
Immune Assay to Detect Specific IgE:
Immune Assay to Detect Total IgE (not Concerned about Specific IgE):
Referring now to
Other examples of configurations for the testing panels can be, but are not limited to: 1) Food 5: Peanut, milk, soy, wheat, egg; 2) Nut and seed panel: almond, cashew, hazelnut, peanut, pecan, walnut, sesame seed, sunflower seed; 3) seafood: crab, lobster, shrimp, salmon, tuna; 4) Pets: cat, dog; 5) Indoor allergens: dust mites, mold mix (alternaria, aspergillus, penicillium, cladosporium), cat, dog; and 6) seasonal allergens: grass (Bermuda, bahia, Johnson, rye, timothy), trees (oak, elm, cedar, mesquite, pine, etc.), weeds (pigweed, ragweed, sage, Russian thistle).
With respect to other non-allergen antigens, the panels may be for testing for strep, Zika, flu, anthrax, cold viruses, cancer, HPV, Lyme disease, mononucleosis (mono), and other illnesses, and/or other conditions such as pregnancy (hCG detection) and disease risks. Some embodiments may allow for the testing of various arboviruses (arthropod-borne viruses). Arboviruses are viruses that are transmitted by arthropods, with mosquitos being a common vector for the virus. Vectors are organisms that transfer the virus from a host that carries the virus. Thus, in the case of mosquitos, a mosquito that feeds on a host that is infected with a virus may infect others when that mosquito again feeds on an uninfected host. Well-known arboviruses include Dengue virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, Rift Valley fever virus, West Nile virus, yellow fever virus, chikungunya, and Zika virus. Urine, blood, and saliva and other biologics may be used for arboviruses testing.
Certain antigens or medical conditions may be logically paired together. For instance, a testing device may include both a strip for detection of pregnancy and a strip for the detection of the zika virus, as the Zika virus has been known to cause birth defects in infants born to pregnant women that are infected with Zika. Thus, combining these two tests into a single testing device or kit would alert a woman to a potential Zika infection proximate in time to the time she also discovers she is pregnant, allowing the woman to seek medical attention immediately. This is a substantial improvement over past Zika testing, where a woman may be required to wait weeks before results are returned from a lab after having the biologic collected by her physician. In many cases, this may lead to a woman having passed a state-mandated cutoff point for abortions, such as 24 weeks in some states. Combining a Zika test with a pregnancy test and physically linking the two tests, and thus allowing for a woman to determine a Zika risk at the time of taking a pregnancy test, in which a pregnancy test may be taken as soon as six days after conception, allows for that woman to take action much sooner than the state mandated cutoff and waiting for lab results would allow.
Various testing devices that include the test strip 100 or strips may be used, such as a slide that supports the test strip 100, a cassette based diagnostic test, a dipstick, or combinations thereof. The test results in various embodiments may be in the form of a visual qualitative reading test, a visual semiquantitative format, a reader quantitative assay format, and/or combinations thereof. Additionally, an electronic implementation may be used where the result is displayed digitally on a screen disposed within the apparatus, and visible to the user.
The apparatus and method of detection may be a “one-step” approach from sample to reading without sample dilution or other sample manipulation. The sample may be diluted or endure other sample manipulation, for example the blood sample is diluted with a buffer.
Referring now to
The testing device 300 may also have disposed on the surface of the housing a crosshair symbol 310, used as an alignment target. This symbol may be a graphic printed or adhered to the testing device 300. The crosshair symbol 310 is used to align the testing device 300 for the taking of an image of the testing device 300 using a camera on a mobile device, for use in a mobile device application described herein. In other embodiments, the crosshair symbol 310 may be other types of symbols, such as a simple shape (circle, square, etc.), other images (such as a medical cross symbol, an arrow, etc.), or any other type of image.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The diagnostic test can, for example, be produced in a various formats for different users, such as, but not limited to, consumer/in-home use where the test is purchased through retail channels which will allow individuals to get an immediate, cost-effective test result that can lead to specific avoidance and treatment through follow-up with a medical professional.
The diagnostic test can be provided to and used by hospitals and clinics to provide rapid, on-site test results that are required to prescribe certain medications, such as omaluzimab, by their FDA labels.
This diagnostic assay can be modified to detect the presence of specific IgE in pets.
It is also noted that housing 602 is designed such that both strips 604 are disposed in physical proximity thereto and in the same actual housing. In this manner, both sets are linked physically to each other such that they cannot be separated and can be associated with a single individual and the actual test cannot be separated. As such, when a patient applies the specimens to the two areas 608 and the test results are exhibited, there is a high probability that two tests were performed at the same time associated with the same patient. Additionally, and electronic chip (not shown) can be embedded within the housing 602 such that the housing 602 can be registered to a specific patient and associated with the medical records of that patient.
Referring now to
It will be understood by one skilled in the art that the antibodies and antigens applied to the testing strip may be altered depending on the type of condition being tested. For example, in the case of testing for medical conditions that do not involve an illness or infection, like pregnancy, and thus the sample biologic does not contain antibodies associated with the condition, antibodies that react to markers being tested for may be applied to the testing strip instead of an antigen. For instance, pregnancy test requires testing for the presence of hCG. Since hCG is a hormone and not an antibody produced in response to an infection, the testing strip may have antibodies that will react to the presence of hCG applied to the testing zone or line of the testing strip, as well as to the conjugate pad. Similarly, some tests might require antibodies be applied to the testing strip to detect antigens present in the sample, rather than antibodies.
Referring now to
In
The results indicator 814 may be a qualitative result or a quantitative result. For example, and as shown in
This same quantitative rating system may be applied to any test (viral infections, bacterial infections, pregnancy, and other health conditions), as the quantitative test can be performed using the software described herein to accurately test bound antibody concentrations on the test strip. In some embodiments, a combined qualitative and quantitative result may be presented, such as both a rating and a plus or minus sign being presented, or other types of quantitative and qualitative indications. Additionally, various combinations of tests may be provided for in the testing device, such as pregnancy/Zika, pregnancy/flu, pregnancy/strep/Zika, etc.
Referring now to
In some embodiments, the number of pixels indicating bound antibodies on the strip may be measured against that in the control line to compare line intensity between the two lines, with the control line acting as an example of a strong reaction, indicating a strong infection, and determining how close the test line intensity is to the control line. This would lead to a logical quantitative result. For instance, if the test line is determined to have a pixel count and line intensity that is 25% of the pixel count and line intensity of the control line, a rating of 25 may be given. If a qualitative result is to be provided, a rating of 25 may give a qualitative result that is negative, or it could be positive depending on the type of condition being tested and known actual infection results where a rating of 25 occurred for that condition.
In some embodiments, the test line may not be compared with the control line to determine a result. Rather, the mobile device application may have access to a database having data on numerous past tests for the same condition. This data may instead be used as the control. This allows the application on the mobile device to retrieve data on past tests and compare the test line data of the current test to past tests. Overall data for past tests may be provided and compared against, such as providing an average or a curve of past tests, or individual tests rated as having accurate results may be compared against.
In addition to a status result of an infection or other medical condition being provided to the user, other indicators of health may also be tested and results thereon provided. This provides for potential early identification of pregnancy and risk of morbidity, allowing for medical attention to be sought much more quickly. Indicators of health may be detected from biologics, such as urine and blood. Urine, for example, allows for the detection of glucose levels, proteins, bacteria, and infectious markers. In the case of glucose, glucose is usually not found in urine, but, if it is, that is an indicator of extremely high levels of glucose in the body, where the kidneys release excess glucose into urine. This is often a sign of diabetes. Protein in the urine may indicate a malfunctioning of the kidneys, which could be the result of high blood pressure. Similarly, if blood is detected in urine, it could be a sign of a problem with the kidneys or the bladder. Blood, for example, allows for the detection of glucose, inflammation, hormones, genetic defect risks, and metabolic endocrine disorders.
Referring now to
The results indicator 814 provides numeric ratings, in this case, 1-100, with the blood pressure rating being 88 and the glucose rating being 95. This indicates that both blood pressure and glucose are extremely high. Due to this, an additional alert indicator 1002 is presented to the user on the screen of the mobile device, alerting the user to seek medical attention immediately. This is to ensure that the health of both the pregnant woman and the fetus can be checked as close to the time of pregnancy detection as possible and medical attention received if needed.
Referring now to
At decision block 1110, it is determined whether the ratings for each condition exceed a certain threshold for that condition. If not, the process 1100 moves to step 1112, where an indication is presented to the user via the mobile device screen that medical attention is not currently advised or necessary. If at step 1110 it is determined that at least one of the medical conditions being tested rises above a certain threshold, the process 1100 moves to step 1114 where a warning is presented to the user via the mobile device screen that medical attention is advised. The thresholds for medical conditions may not trigger a warning even if a rating exceeds a threshold, if, in the event of multiple tests being performed, the combined test results do not warrant immediate medical attention. For example, if a user is testing for a cold virus, blood pressure, and glucose, and only the cold virus rating is above the threshold, there may not be a warning provided to the user. Additionally, ratings may be weighted or aggregated based on the medical conditions being tested. For example, if blood pressure, inflammation, and glucose are being tested for, and they all are given only moderate ratings that do not rise above the threshold for any condition individually, an warning to seek medical attention may still be provided due to the combination of conditions taken together.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
At step 1414, the results are provided to the user on the user's mobile device. At step 1416, the results are provided to the user's healthcare provider. The healthcare provider may receive the test results due to a visit from the user, the user bringing the results of the test with her on her mobile device, or the healthcare provider may receive the results from the database 1204 if the healthcare provider has permission to access the database 1204, or if access is granted in anticipation of the user's appointment with the healthcare provider. At step 1418, the test results are also provided to other healthcare industry individuals and organizations, including medical researchers, hospitals, and others.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The testing device 1700 includes a housing 1702 that forms the body of the testing device. The housing 1702 may be made of plastic, metal, or any material durable enough for shipping and subsequent handling by a user. The housing 1702 may be hollow so that a plurality of immunoassay test pads 1704 may be housed within and so that a biologic may be deposited within the housing 1702. The testing device 1700 may further have a plurality of sample wells 1706, each sample well having one of the plurality of immunoassay test pads 1704 disposed within, and allowing for a user to view at least a section of a nitrocellulose membrane of each of the immunoassay test pads 1704, the membrane 1708 having a test line 1708 and control line 1710. The testing device 1700 may also have disposed on the surface of the housing a crosshair symbol 1712, used as an alignment target. This symbol may be a graphic printed or adhered to the testing device 1700. The crosshair symbol 1712 is used to align the testing device 1700 for the taking of an image of the testing device 1700 using a camera on a mobile device, for use in a mobile device application described herein. In other embodiments, the crosshair symbol 1712 may be other types of symbols, such as a simple shape (circle, square, etc.), other images (such as a medical cross symbol, an arrow, etc.), or any other type of image. In other embodiments, the device 1700 may be configured in such a way as to allow a biologic sample to be deposited into a sample well, and to present the results of the test on the opposite side of the housing. Such a configuration would allow the biologic to flow through the testing pad within the housing, with the reaction occurring on a reactive membrane on the side of the device opposite the sample well, with the device having a window for viewing the results.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The embodiment illustrated in
Referring now to
Chart 2000 illustrates how past tests results may be collected and used to determine the risk of a current test user. A y axis 2002 represents a risk level rating, ranging from 0 at the origin to 100. An x axis 2004 represents time, wherein a plurality of normalized test results is plotted on the chart 2000. The chart 2000 is further divided into sections across the y axis 2002, indicating various risk level thresholds. For instance, and as illustrated in the chart 2000, there may be at certain rating levels different thresholds of risk labeled as low, moderate, above average, and high risk levels. These thresholds may be moved over time as more data is accumulated via users conducting tests and the mobile application storing the data on the tests. When a user conducts a test, the user's normalized rating can be plotted similarly to past test results and weighed against them in order to provide a risk level for the user.
Referring now to
It should be understood that the drawings and detailed description herein are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive manner, and are not intended to be limiting to the particular forms and examples disclosed. On the contrary, included are any further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope hereof, as defined by the following claims. Thus, it is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/295,398, filed on Oct. 17, 2016, and entitled PREGNANCY TEST TO ASSESS DISEASE RISK. This application also claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/419,380, filed on Nov. 8, 2016, and entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VARIABLE FUNCTION MOBILE APPLICATION FOR PROVIDING MEDICAL TEST RESULTS.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4861711 | Friesen et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5081013 | Rovelli et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5468648 | Chandler | Nov 1995 | A |
5567594 | Calenoff | Oct 1996 | A |
5587061 | Chen | Dec 1996 | A |
5627908 | Lee et al. | May 1997 | A |
5709788 | Chen | Jan 1998 | A |
5904826 | Chen | May 1999 | A |
6149865 | Hsu | Nov 2000 | A |
7090802 | Wang | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7235098 | Palmaz | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7989217 | Yee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8308452 | Amirouche et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8506901 | Chen et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8508757 | Koehl | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8655009 | Chen et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8807169 | Amirouche et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8877140 | Chen et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8911679 | Chen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9285323 | Burg et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9390237 | Myers et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9523358 | Amirouche et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9569858 | Babcock et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9607380 | Burg et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9726161 | Kim et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9857372 | Pulitzer | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9857373 | Pulitzer | Jan 2018 | B1 |
10473659 | Pulitzer et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
20020134682 | Chen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030003522 | Goldman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030172009 | Katou et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030207458 | Sookbumroong | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040018576 | DeMatteo et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023412 | Carlsson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050266582 | Modlin et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008920 | Wong et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060014302 | Martinez | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060166374 | Hubscher | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060222567 | Kloepfer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245933 | Balch | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070092407 | Xiao et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080070599 | Apodaca | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080118397 | Slowey | May 2008 | A1 |
20090298191 | Whitesides et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299138 | Mitsuhashi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100125186 | Abuachi | May 2010 | A1 |
20100317033 | Abdel | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110077971 | Surwit | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120053843 | Tubb | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120082598 | Baydoun | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120176487 | Pinard et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120284046 | Baym et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130090938 | Fishman et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130161190 | Ewart et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130189794 | Emeric et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130203043 | Ozcan | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222634 | Setlur et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130273528 | Ehrenkranz | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140051173 | Barstis et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140072189 | Jena | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089006 | Abreu | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140121487 | Faybishenko et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140170679 | Aitchison | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140279754 | Barsoum et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150025808 | Aguiar | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150056719 | Karlovac | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150099656 | Manuguerra et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150161330 | Joao et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150186518 | Kusumoto et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150308961 | Burg | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150330985 | St-Pierre | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150359458 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160057413 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160077091 | Tyrrell et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160080548 | Erickson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160117463 | Nemiroski et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160187263 | Brown | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160223536 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160225165 | Russell et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160260215 | Burg et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160274104 | Aminoff et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160349185 | Park et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170002432 | Apte et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170011192 | Arshad et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032092 | Mink et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170059566 | Reed et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170061074 | Singh et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170089893 | Legere, III | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170091388 | Zolla et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170212124 | Thalhammer et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170328892 | Crisanti et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180117272 | Fu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190187140 | Kamei et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105954512 | Sep 2016 | CN |
2404673 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2844748 | Mar 2015 | EP |
3010188 | Mar 2015 | FR |
2001050397 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2010118124 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2013158504 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2014080212 | May 2014 | WO |
2014113770 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014080212 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2015022318 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO-2015016960 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO-2015022318 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO-2015054546 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015143309 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016079219 | May 2016 | WO |
WO-2016079219 | May 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Lanciotti et al. (“Genetic and Serologic Properties of Zika Virus Associated with an Epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007” Emerging Infectious Diseases, www.cdc.gov/eid, vol. 14, No. 8, Aug. 2008) (Year: 2008). |
“Interim Guidelines for Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak—United States, 2016” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 65(2);30-33, posted online Jan. 19, 2016, retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6502e1.htm on Aug. 5, 2019, 6 pages total (Year: 2016). |
Jianjun Li et al. Application of Microfluidic Devices to Proteomics Research. Journal: Molecular & Cellular Proteomics Jan. 3, 2002. 1:157-168. Canada. |
Pegah N. Abadian et al. Accepted Manuscript. Book: Analytical Methods. 22pgs. Boston, MA. |
Kling A. et al. Electrochemical microfluidic platform for simultaneous multianalyte detection. Article, 2015, 916-919, Europe. |
Andre Kling et al. Multianalyte Antibiotic Detection on an Electrochemical Microfluidic Platform. Article. Jul. 19, 2016, 10036-10043, Germany. |
Mercier Marco. Microfluidic Continuous Flow Cell Counting and Concentration. Article. 10pgs. |
Meichei Wang Kadlec et. al. A Cell Phone-Based Microphotometric System for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Journal. 2014, vol. 19 (3) 258-266. Tucson, AZ. |
Hongying Zhu et. al. Cost-effective and compact wide-field fluorescent imaging on a cell-phone. Article. Jan. 21, 2011. 315-322, 11(2). California. |
Moffitt Jeffrey R. et al. The single-cell chemostat: an agarose-based, microfluidic device for high-throughput, single-cell studies of bacteria and bacterial communities. Article. Oct. 24, 2017. 21pgs. 12(8). |
Temiz Yuksel et al. Microelectronic Engineering. Article. 2015. 156-175. Published by Elsevier B.V. Switzerland. |
Vasdekis Andreas et al. Review of methods to probe single cell metabolism and bioenergetics, Journal, Jan. 20151. 115-135. Published by Elsevier. |
Wang Shuqi et al. Portable microfluidic chip for detection of Escherichia coli produce and blood. International Journal of Nanomedicine. May 27, 2012. 2012:7 2591-2600. MA. |
Hoylandm James Donaldson. Microfluidic chip and connector. Nov. 11, 2012, 16pgs. Europe. |
Baltekin Ozden et al. Antibiotic susceptibility testing in less than 30 min using direct single-cell imaging. Aug. 22, 2017. 9170-9175 vol. 114-34. |
Ashraf Muhammad Waseem. Micro Electromechanical Systems (MEMS) Based Microfluidic Devices for Biomedical Applications. Journal : Molecular Sciences. Jun. 7, 2011. 3648-3704. |
Radenovic Aleksandra. Advanced Bioengineering Methods Laboratory Microfluidics Lab on Chip. 27pgs. |
U. Hassan et al, A microfluidic biochip for complete blood cell counts at the point-of-care, Dec. 2015, 201-213, 3(4). |
Kling Andre et al, Multianalyte Antibiotic Detection on an Electrochemical Microfluidic Platform, 1-3 pgs. Germany. |
Au K. Anthony et al, Microvalves and Micropumps for BioMEMS, May 24, 2011, 179-220. |
Sticker Drago et al., Multi-layered, membrane-integrated microfluidics based on replica molding of a thiol-ene epoxy thermoset for . . . Article, Nov. 2015, 4542-4554. |
Shaegh et al, Plug-and-play microvalve and micropump for rapid integration with microfluidic chips, Article, Apr. 22, 2015, 557-564, Massachusetts, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. |
Schaler Dawn et al, Microfluidic cell counter with embedded optical fibers fabricated by femtosecond laser ablation and anodic bonding, Article, Apr. 13, 2009, 17(8), 6068-6073, Colorado. |
Brown, M. C. et al. (2009). Lateral Flow Immunoassay. Tse, H. Y., Wong, R. C. (Eds.). New York, NY: Humana Press, (223 pages total). |
Baltekin, O., et al. (Aug. 22, 2017) Antibiotic susceptibility testing in less than 30 min using direct single-cell imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(34). |
Mudanyali, O. et al. Integrated Rapid-Diagnostic-Test Reader Platform on a Cellphone. Lab on a Chip, vol. 12, No. 15. Aug. 7, 2012; pp. 7, 12. |
Acharya, D. et al. An ultrasensitive electrogenerated chemiluminescence-based immunoassay for specific detection of Zika virus. Scientific Reports 6, Article No. 32227. Aug. 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US17/57037, dated Dec. 28, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US17/57039, dated Dec. 26, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US17/57041, dated Dec. 14, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US17/60252, dated Jan. 12, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT/US17/66528, dated Mar. 7, 2018. |
Feng, S., Caire, R., Cortazar, B., Turan, M., Wong, A., & Ozcan, A. (2014). Immunochromatographic diagnostic test analysis usingGoogle Glass. ACS nano, 8(3), 3069-3079. (Year: 2014). |
Lee, S., O'Dell, D., Hohenstein, J. et al. NutriPhone: a mobile platform for low-cost point-of-care quantification of vitamin B12 concentrations. Sci Rep 6, 28237 (2016) doi: 1 0.1 038/srep28237 (Year: 2016). |
Marrs et al., Zika Virus and Pregnancy: A Review of the Literature and Clinical Considerations, Jun. 2016, Am. J. Perinatal., vol. 33 , Issue 7, pp. 625-639. (Year: 2016). |
Rabe et al., Interim Guidance for Interpretaiton of Zika Virus Antibody Test Results, MMWR, 65(21 ), Jun. 2016, pp. 1-6. (Year:2016). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180107790 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62419380 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15295398 | Oct 2016 | US |
Child | 15804986 | US |