This disclosure is generally related to a system and method for facilitating effective exercise.
Studies have shown that when vibration is added to a conventional exercise, more motor units in the muscle are stimulated and engaged. As a result, the stimulation is more effective and the subsequent muscle development can occur faster. For example, a vibration-assisted exercise system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,238,143, entitled “BODY VIBRATION GENERATOR HAVING ATTACHMENTS FOR EXERCISES TO TARGET BODY REGIONS,” by inventors Genadijus Sokolovos, Nikiforas Sokolovas, and Birute Sokolova, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Adding mechanical vibration to an exercise system, however, is not always feasible. Various existing exercise machines may have space limitations. In addition, certain types of exercise machines may use a loading mechanism that can be incompatible with adding physical vibration.
One embodiment of the present invention provides an exercise system that facilitates a varying load. During operation, the system produces a load-control pattern using a control module, and varies a load using a load-varying mechanism based on the load-control pattern, thereby facilitating varying-load during exercise for effective muscle stimulation.
In a variation on this embodiment, the load-control pattern indicates one or more parameters, such as: an amplitude range for the load, a frequency range for varying the load, a period duration for varying the load, a number of periods for load variation, a randomized load, and a randomized frequency for varying the load.
In a variation on this embodiment, the system receives a user input to select a pre-configured load-varying program or to define a custom load-varying program.
In a variation on this embodiment, the load-varying mechanism includes an electrical generator coupled to a circuit. Furthermore, the circuit includes a circuit-control module.
In a further variation, the circuit-control module can vary a resistive load of the circuit using pulse width modulation based on a control signal.
In a variation on this embodiment, the load-varying mechanism includes an electro-magnetic braking mechanism.
In a further variation, the electro-magnetic braking mechanism applies a braking force based on the load-control pattern.
In a further variation, the system includes a rotor. In addition, the electro-magnetic braking mechanism applies a braking force on the rotor.
In a variation on this embodiment, the system includes a weight coupled to the load-varying mechanism.
In a variation on this embodiment, the load-varying mechanism includes a mechanical braking mechanism.
In a further variation, the mechanical braking mechanism includes a rotor plate, a plurality of adjustable magnets positioned on the rotor plate, and a fixed magnet positioned near the rotor plate. The height of a respective adjustable magnet can be adjusted, which facilitates variation of distance between the adjustable magnet and the fixed magnet, thereby allowing a resistance force between the rotor plate and the fixed magnet to be varied when the rotor plate rotates.
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein. Furthermore, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the examples described herein, and can be used with any resistance based training equipment.
Overview
Embodiments of the present invention solve the problem of improving the efficacy in various exercise systems by varying the load of these exercise systems. By varying the load of an exercise, the present inventive system can achieve a similar result as an exercise system that applies mechanical vibration. Furthermore, the present inventive system can be used with a wide variety of exercise mechanisms that are incompatible with adding mechanical vibration. As a result, the improved efficacy associated with vibration or varying load can be attained for exercises specific to a large number of sports and/or exercises associated with any resistance based training equipment.
Note that the example illustrated in
In general, load-varying module 106 can be configured to vary the load in terms of both amplitude and frequency.
In general, a load-varying exercise system can include a load-varying module that facilitates the load variation describe above.
In one embodiment, control unit 320 can include a processor 304 and storage device 306, which can store the instructions which when executed by processor 304 cause the processor 304 to perform a method that facilitates generation of the control signal for load-varying mechanism 322. In addition, control unit 320 can be coupled to a user input module 326, which allows a user to select a pre-configured load-variation program or compose his own load-variation program. In one embodiment, user input module 326 can include a switch that allows a user to select between a pre-configured program and a user-defined program. In a further embodiment, user input module 326 can include a display and an input device (e.g., a touch screen). In a further embodiment, user input module 326 can include a communication module (such as a WiFi or Bluetooth module) that allows the system to communicate with a user device (such as an application running on a mobile device). The user can use the user device to program load-varying module 300.
Note that control unit 320 can allow a user to program or select the amplitude, frequency, and periods for varying the load. For example, a user can select a program that has two alternating load-variation periods, wherein during the first period the load varies between 20 and 25 kg, with a frequency range of 3-20 Hz; and wherein during the second period the load varies between 30-35 kg, with a frequency range of 2-8 Hz. The user can also define a customized program by specifying the load range, frequency range, period duration, and number of periods. In some embodiments, the program can be based on a random load and frequency.
Various methods can be used to implement the load-varying mechanism. The creation of a load can be based on a generator, electromagnetic brake, or mechanical brake. Other types of braking systems can also be used. These braking mechanisms can be controlled by an analog circuit, a digital circuit, or a combination thereof. An analog circuit can be used to adjust the load in a braking mechanism proportional to an input signal, for example by linearly varying the current through the field windings of an AC generator. The analog control circuit could be driven by a user interface with options for various parameters such as frequencies, load profiles, repetitions, etc.
Load control of various types of braking systems can also be carried out using digital pulse width modulation (PWM). A digital PWM load control system can involve turning the load fully on or fully off for varying durations at a sufficiently high frequency, so that the user does not perceive the pulse modulation. For example, if the user desires a load that is 90% of the maximum load, then the PWM circuit can generate a signal that is on for 90% of the pulse period and off for 10% of the pulse period (i.e., has a duty cycle of 90%). If the pulse is generated with a sufficiently high frequency, then the user would not perceive the pulsation (but can still experience the 90% load). This can be a generally lower-cost method for simulating an analog output using a digital processor. As an example, in the case of the varying-load vibration device where the user might want a load that is varying between 70% of maximum and 30% of maximum at a frequency of 10 hz, the PWM circuit can generate a pulse train with a frequency of 1 kHz and a duty cycle of 70% for 0.1 seconds, followed by a duty cycle of 30% for 0.1 seconds. This would create a load with a square wave profile. More complicated profiles could be generated by different PWM profiles.
Shown below is an oscilloscope output showing a digital PWM signal (lower trace) and the analog signal produced by filtering (upper trace). The PWM signal is a fixed frequency but the duty cycle is varied. The PWM frequency selected is high relative to the frequency content of the output so that filtering will produce a smooth signal.
In some embodiments, an electric generator coupled with a variable electrical load can be used to facilitate the load-varying mechanism. For example, a 12-pole brushless permanent-magnet motor running as a generator with a PWM circuit to control the load can be used as a load-varying system. The 12-pole motor can provide a relatively smooth feel for the user. In general, a 12-pole motor can be much smoother than a 2-pole motor.
Note that various methods can be used to create the load, such as systems employing electromagnetic brakes, generators, mechanical brake with electrical actuation, etc. Furthermore, there can be various ways to control these loads, e.g., analog circuit and digital PWM circuit.
During operation, a user's physical exercise can result in a linear motion of cable 401, which causes shaft 402 to rotate. In turn, shaft 402 can drive electric generator 404. As a result, a voltage is generated across circuit 405. In one embodiment, circuit-control module 406 can include an on/off switch that is controlled by a control signal 408. This on/off switch can open and close circuit 405 based on control signal 408. When the on/off switch in circuit-control module 406 opens circuit 405, no current can flow through circuit 405. As a result, only a small amount of mechanical resistance (which is caused by the interaction between the permanent magnets and coil in generator 404) is applied to shaft 402. When the on/off switch closes the circuit, a current flows through resistive load 410, which consumes power and generates heat. Correspondingly, a non-negligible, greater amount of mechanical resistance can be created by generator 404 and applied to shaft 402. Note that the on/off switch in circuit-control module 406 is for illustration purposes. In practice, the on/off switch can be implemented using a semiconductor device (for example, a device based on metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) or insulated-gate bipolar transistor (IBGT)) and produce a PWM signal. Note that dynamic or active braking, where current is fed back into the windings of the motor, may be used depending on the load circuit inductance and PWM frequency.
In one embodiment, control signal 408 can be a high-frequency (for example, on the order of tens or hundreds of kilohertz) digital (or analog) signal. The duty cycle of control signal 408, which determines the portion of a full cycle duration during which circuit 405 is closed, can be used to control the amount of resistive load applied to circuit 405. For example, if the duty cycle of control signal 408 is 50%, on average, the amount of resistive load applied to circuit 405 is approximately 50% of resistive load 410. Therefore, by varying the duty cycle of control signal 408, one can vary the mechanical resistance applied to shaft 402. Note that the frequency of control signal 408 can be chosen to be sufficiently high, such that the user would not perceive the on/off switching of circuit 405.
To facilitate the actual desired physical load variation in terms of amplitude and frequency, as those illustrated in
The exemplary circuit illustrated in
In some embodiments, an electro-magnetic braking system can be used to facilitate load variation.
Note that various types of electro-mechanical braking systems can be used here. For example, electro-magnetic braking system 508 can be a friction-plate based brake, wherein a brake pad and an electro-magnetically actuated clutch can be used to slow down the motion of rotor 506, thereby controlling the resistance against the user's pulling motion. In a further embodiment, braking system 508 can be a particle based system, wherein magnetic particles can fill a cavity that houses rotor 506. When a magnetic flux is present (which can be proportional to the electricity supplied to the system), the magnetic particles tend to bind with each other, thereby creating a viscous environment for rotor 506. The viscosity of the binding particles is related to the strength of the magnetic flux, which in turn can be controlled by the load-varying control signal.
Other types of electro-magnetic brakes, such as hysteresis power brakes, can also be used.
The exemplary system shown in
Although the examples described above are based on electro-magnetic braking mechanisms, it is also possible to construct a load-varying exercise system using mechanical braking mechanisms.
As the magnet passed over a disc with a change in height, there would be a reduction in the drag. The concept illustrated in
The methods and systems described herein can also be integrated into hardware modules or apparatus. These modules or apparatus may include, but are not limited to, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chip, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), a system on a chip (SoC), and/or other circuit devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules or apparatus are activated, they perform the circuit functions included within them.
The foregoing descriptions of various embodiments have been presented only for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4358105 | Sweeney, Jr. | Nov 1982 | A |
5816372 | Carlson | Oct 1998 | A |
6147674 | Rosenberg | Nov 2000 | A |
7682287 | Hsieh | Mar 2010 | B1 |
20070298941 | Egger | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20100151994 | Yeh | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100298097 | Preumont | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110237400 | King | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130190143 | Greenhill | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140038777 | Bird | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140213414 | Balandis | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20180214729 | Rubin | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20210354002 | Schaefer | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210361994 | Nørgaard | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20220136576 | Farris | May 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103200909 | Jul 2013 | CN |
20180109750 | Oct 2018 | KR |
20180109750 | Oct 2018 | KR |
WO-2007032664 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210268325 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |