This application includes material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The present invention relates to the field of pesticide delivery and in particular to a system and method for vehicular mounted chemical and organic delivery.
Insects, and the damage they cause, are a serious economic threat to fruit and vegetable farmers worldwide. For example, importing countries will block fruit and vegetable shipments from certain exporting countries, rather than risk their phytosanitary status by importing foreign fruits and vegetables.
One type of insect that is of major concern is the fruit fly. There are over 4,000 species of fruit flies worldwide today. The genus Anastrepha, found throughout the Americas, Florida and the Caribbean Islands, comprises approximately 180 species. Of these 180 species, 7 cause serious economic damage.
The Ceratitis Capatata, commonly known as the Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Medfly), is the most widespread and damaging fruit fly in the world. The Medfly can currently be found in Guatemala and the Mexican states bordering Guatemala. If the Medfly reaches Oaxaca and/or Veracruz, it will have a corridor to the United States. Countermeasures, particularly effective means of pest control, are needed to prevent the spread of the Medfly to the United States.
Compounds known and popularly used in the art to control pests include Spinosad and Malathion. One commercial product which is well-known for use against the Medfly is SUCCESS (GF 120 and a spinosad concentration of 80 ppm), manufactured by Dow Agri Sciences. Currently, many other types of insecticides, herbicides, bacteriostats, fungicides, pesticides, plant nutrients or other active agents applied to crops and their surrounding environments are known in the field and are utilized regularly by growers to protect and fertilize crops.
Prior methods of application include manual application, foot-borne spraying, aerial application and tractor driven spraying. Manual and foot-borne sprayer applications are tedious tasks and inefficient at best. For example, if one were to place 3.7 gallons of SUCCESS into a container it would weigh a cumbersome 37 lbs. Often a spraying apparatus can weigh over 20 lbs. Thus an operator of such an apparatus would have to carry almost 60 lbs. while walking in often rugged environments. Aerial application is often thought of as the most efficient means of application. However, aerial application cannot be used effectively in or near populated areas, organic farms and environmentally sensitive areas. Aerial application does not effectively treat the area under the canopy, where it is ideal to apply insecticides, herbicides, bacteriostats, fungicides, pesticides, plant nutrients or other active agents. Aerial application to the top of the canopy leaves the composition exposed to UV Rays which will degrade the composition and leaves the composition exposed to the elements of nature which will cause erosion of the composition. Tractor-driven units, while suitable for their intended use, are subject to certain limitations similar to those of aerial application in that under certain conditions they are unable to reach the ideal target area in an efficient manner.
Accordingly, the present invention is directed to a system and method for vehicular mounted chemical or organic agent delivery that substantially obviates one or more of the problems due to limitations and disadvantages of the related art.
An object of the present invention is to provide a system and method of delivering a chemical or organic agent to otherwise inaccessible areas.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.
To achieve these and other advantages and in accordance with the purpose of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described, in one aspect of the present invention there is provided a frame-mounted delivery system, for use with a motorized vehicle.
In another aspect of the present invention there is provided an apparatus and method for applying the chemical or organic agent in a controlled and relative manner in which the amount of chemical or organic agent applied is related to the speed of the vehicle.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
In the drawings:
a is a cross sectional view of the nozzle shown in FIG. 3.
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The frame is preferably comprised of aluminum piping and planar aluminum members that may be welded together. As shown in
A blower apparatus 101 is mounted 200 on the frame 100. In the shown embodiment a Stihl Model BR420 blower apparatus is utilized. The backpack apparatus, such as that shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,125,503 to Callahan was removed and the mounts on the Stihl Model BR420 utilized to mount 200 the blower apparatus on the frame 100. Any blower similar to that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,108,865 to Veser et. al could be utilized in the present invention, if able to produce winds of approximately 180 miles per hour.
The tube 102 extending from the motor area of the blower apparatus is fitted into the base of the nozzle 103 and secured thereto. In the shown embodiment two cross-members 104 are present to provide support and to mount 200 the blower apparatus 101 upon.
The controls are able to be locked, enabling the blower 101 to operate at a constant number of RPM. Operation of the throttle-locking mechanism is optional, but desirable as the operator is then free to operate the controls of the vehicle.
Additionally, the amount of chemical or organic agent dispensed by the present invention can be applied in a controlled and relative manner in which the amount of chemical or organic agent applied is relative to the speed of the vehicle. A formula for application of the chemical or organic agent is: [Gallons Per Acre*Miles Per Hour*Swath Width (in feet)]/495 Volume Per Minute (in gallons)
The present embodiment, mounted on an ATV, utilizes a Masterflex Model No. 7533-50, 7533-60, 7533-70 or 7533-80 peristaltic pump with controls for the pump 207 being mounted on one of the cross members 104 of the frame.
One may utilize the pump controls 207 in order to set the rate of administration of the pump relative to the anticipated speed at which the operator will travel. Alternatively, speed detection means such as a radar apparatus may be mounted on the vehicle and the speed detection means will transfer information of the vehicle's speed to the peristaltic pump 106 whereby the peristaltic pump 106 may accordingly adjust the rate of administration. The chemical or organic agent is administered into the nozzle via tubing, such as ¼″ copper tubing 206 shown in the present embodiment.
The tubing 206 is connected to a peristaltic pump housed within a box 106 formed by aluminum members. The pump can be accessed by removing the top of the aluminum box which rotates on a hinge 107. The peristaltic pump of the present embodiment operates at up to 600 RPM.
The opposite end of the tubing 305 travels up into the nozzle 103 and runs generally laterally along the top of the nozzle 103 but does not extend out of the end of the nozzle. The end of the tubing in the nozzle 305 is cut at an angle, allowing the open end of the tube to face downward. In the shown embodiment the tubing was cut at a 45° angle. The downward orientation and angle allow for the chemical or organic agent to be delivered and drawn into the air stream created by the blower 101 by gravity.
A reservoir of chemical or organic agent is mounted somewhere on the vehicle. In the present embodiment the reservoir is mounted on the front rack of an ATV. The peristaltic pump 106 is connected to the reservoir by a piece of tubing. In the present embodiment a piece of ⅜″ rubber tubing was utilized to provide the flow to the suction side of the peristaltic pump 106.
In the embodiment shown, the frame is mounted on the rear of an ATV. The blower controls 204 are easily accessible at the side of the operator of the vehicle. A user of the present invention, initially needs to set the peristaltic pump 106, unless means of speed detection are used to constantly change the pump's rate. The operator may then set the controls 204 of the blower to a constant rate, as recommended or utilize them in manual fashion. Once the pump and blower controls are set, the operator need only drive the vehicle and apply the chemical or organic agent as so desired.
While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/293,175, filed May 25, 2001 by Richard David Robinson, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/323,386, filed Sep. 20, 2001, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/051,382, filed Jan. 22, 2002, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3582496 | Pfaffenbach | Jun 1971 | A |
3607780 | Scott | Sep 1971 | A |
3648401 | Stains | Mar 1972 | A |
3793762 | Stains | Feb 1974 | A |
3893622 | Waldron | Jul 1975 | A |
3982351 | Waldron | Sep 1976 | A |
4182491 | Parke et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4220998 | Kays | Sep 1980 | A |
4580721 | Coffee et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4658778 | Gamoh et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4688349 | Renth | Aug 1987 | A |
4721246 | Lefebvre et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4803626 | Bachman et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4886208 | Strand | Dec 1989 | A |
4930702 | Vanderjagt | Jun 1990 | A |
4992206 | Waldrop | Feb 1991 | A |
5052618 | Carlon et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5248448 | Waldron et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5269461 | Davis | Dec 1993 | A |
5310113 | Cowgur | May 1994 | A |
5315564 | Upton | May 1994 | A |
5419493 | Redway | May 1995 | A |
5439173 | Waldrop | Aug 1995 | A |
5478013 | Ballu | Dec 1995 | A |
5547128 | Scheffler | Aug 1996 | A |
5564628 | Hall et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5718377 | Tedders et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5756046 | Winks et al. | May 1998 | A |
6032407 | Conner | Mar 2000 | A |
6105878 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108865 | Veser et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125503 | Callahan | Oct 2000 | A |
6206300 | Roudebush et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6336594 | Bader et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6517856 | Roe et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2829468 | Jan 1980 | DE |
4010707 | Oct 1991 | DE |
272740 | Jun 1988 | EP |
353132 | Jan 1990 | EP |
7900969 | Aug 1980 | NL |
820764 | Apr 1981 | RU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030046859 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60323386 | Sep 2001 | US | |
60293175 | May 2001 | US |