The following relates to RFID systems and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for micro-localization of UHF passive RFID tags moving along a known, unidirectional path.
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems use RFID tags to identify and/or track objects or living things. Typically, the tags are affixed to respective objects and when these tags are excited, they produce or reflect a magnetic or electric field at some frequency. The reflected field is modulated with an identifying code to identify the particular tag, and/or other useful information.
An RFID tag may either be active or passive. Whereas active tags have a self-contained power supply and signal source, a passive tag receives an exciting signal at an exciting frequency from a transmitting antenna of an interrogator or reader positioned. Typically, the transmitting antenna is positioned at a portal. The exciting signal causes the RFID tag to transmit a signal, which is received by a receiving antenna adjacent to the transmitting antenna. The receiving antenna receives the modulated signal (magnetic or electromagnetic) produced by the excited tag and consequently the tag and the object to which it is attached can be identified.
Interest in adopting RFID technology for use in automation systems and requiring minimal manual involvement is increasing rapidly. RFID systems are capable of providing real-time object visibility enabling continuous identification and location of all items and thereby providing real-time data management instead of simple snapshots.
While the use of RFID tags is well known, most current RFID systems do not have the ability to locate fast moving tags (two meters per second i.e. 2 m/s or higher) with the accuracy required in many applications. Complexities are attributable to various factors including that the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the detection volume in which the RFID tags are to be read may contain several tags producing several signals, as well as noise, reflections and polarization losses.
Prior approaches for addressing such complexities include confining the RF waves to a small volume using RF reflecting and absorbent materials, and/or controlling the angular extent of the interrogation zone (and thus the tag transmission zone) by using a two-element antenna to transmit a data signal with a directional sum pattern and a scrambled signal with a complementary difference pattern. Other approaches include the use of techniques relating to Doppler shift and triangulation.
While various techniques for localization of RFID tags are known, improvements are of course desirable.
It is an object of an aspect of the following to provide a method and system for wireless communications that addresses at least one of the above complexities.
According to one aspect there is provided a method of estimating position of a moving RFID tag, comprising transmitting at least one interrogator signal; receiving, at an interrogator antenna, a reflected signal from the RFID tag; determining phase changes of the reflected signal with respect to the phase of the at least one interrogator signal; weighting the phase changes based on instant power corresponding to the phase changes; producing a phase trajectory for the reflected signal based on the weighted phase changes; and estimating position of the RFID tag relative to the interrogator antenna based on the peak of the phase trajectory for the reflected signal.
According to another aspect there is provided a system for estimating position of a moving RFID tag, comprising a transmitter for transmitting at least one interrogator signal; a receiver in communication with at least one interrogator antenna receiving a reflected signal from the RFID tag; a phase detector determining phase changes of the reflected signal with respect to the phase of the at least one interrogator signal; a power detector determining instant power of the reflected signal corresponding to the phase changes; a phase peak estimator weighting the phase changes based on instant power and producing a phase trajectory for the reflected signal based on the weighted phase changes; and a position estimator estimating position of the RFID tag relative to the at least one interrogator antenna based on the peak of the phase trajectory.
Embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
In the Tag 105 (see
Returning to
Using the above techniques, as an example an inexpensive, short-range, bi-directional digital radio communications channel can be implemented.
We discuss now how a Modulated Backscattering system is used to determine the relative position between a Tag and an Interrogator antenna, as an example. For this example, assume that the Tag is moving in a constant direction and at a constant velocity under an Interrogator antenna during the period of time the measurement will be taken. Returning to
φ=a tan(q/i)
where: q is the quadrature-phase component of the demodulated signal; and
i is the in-phase component of the demodulated signal.
The mean phase spatial gradient is represented as:
φ′=dφ/dx
where: dφ is the phase differential; and
dx is the differential displacement.
As can be seen in
For a single signal propagation path, the mean spatial gradient of the phase of the signal equals the mean Doppler, fd. In a practical situation, reflecting structures present in the vicinity of reading point cause a rich multipath radio propagation environment. In multipath channels, the mean phase spatial gradient is commonly denoted ‘random-FM’. The mean Doppler and the mean phase gradient are not always identical in multipath environments. However, this has no practical impact on the detection of the zero crossing point as only relative behavior of phase gradient before and after antenna passing point is needed for the identification of the zero crossing and consequently the antenna passing point.
The multipath effect and measurement noise makes it difficult to detect the peak of the phase trajectory directly from measurements. The multipath propagation causes random phase jumps/steps (for the phase gradient this appears as random-FM transients/‘spikes’). Furthermore, different antennae connected to the same Interrogator may show a different peak position and different overlaid phase jumps.
The phase gradient zero-crossing detection is performed by a Phase Gradient Null Estimator 403 as follows. First, the phase trajectories are found from the raw data received. Obvious outliers (jumps) are then detected, and mean powers around these jumps are measured using a Power Detector 404. The measurements are weighted according to a relationship between instant power and magnitude of phase gradient transient. More particularly, instant power monitoring is used more precisely to identify outliers in phase and phase gradient. Following this, signal smoothing is performed. Finally, the measurements are averaged and a new phase peak estimate is extracted. Higher order phase derivatives can also be used to refine the passing point estimation. For example the 2nd order derivative of the phase (the phase curvature) can be used to identify a turn tangent occurring at the passing point. Furthermore, in more sophisticated implementations, the Phase Peak Estimator 403 can be a Kalman filter followed by a linear regression of the phase gradient to find the phase gradient trajectory zero crossing that also identifies the antenna passing point.
The Phase Peak Information Signal 405a is applied to a Position Estimator 406 along with additional Position Information from Optical and Mechanical sensors 407. Other auxiliary dimension, range or position information may be used and be retrieved from typical sensor systems and sources found in RFID and parcel applications, such as X-ray imaging, weight scale; acoustic/ultra-sound ranging and imaging, visual video and imaging, other radio radar. Finally, the Tag Position Information 211a is passed to the Interrogator Processor 200, along with other Tag information such as Tag identification number.
To narrow the Tag activation zone, the Interrogator antennae can be tilted to steer a null 702 in front of the reading gate (see
Multiple antenna Interrogators can be used to compensate for random phase variation accompanying the envelope abrupt change caused by multipath. Combining phase information acquired by each antenna, one can smooth the phase gradient and compensate for correlated effects such as those caused by equipment imperfections. Speed sensors can be used to take into account tag speed variations.
The method and system may be embodied in a software application including computer executable instructions executed by a processing unit such as a personal computer or other computing system environment. The software application may run as a stand-alone tool or may be incorporated into other available applications to provide enhanced functionality to those applications. The software application may comprise program modules including routines, programs, object components, data structures etc. and be embodied as computer readable program code stored on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data, which can thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of computer readable media include for example read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, magnetic tape and optical data storage devices. The computer readable program code can also be distributed over a network including coupled computer systems so that the computer readable program code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
Although embodiments have been described, those of skill in the art will appreciate that variations and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation application based on U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/134,710 filed on Jun. 6, 2008, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,149,093 on Apr. 3, 2012.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4728959 | Maloney et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
5570094 | Armstrong | Oct 1996 | A |
5969254 | Yamaguchi | Oct 1999 | A |
6400318 | Kasami et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420847 | Galbiati et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433740 | Gilhousen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6489917 | Geisheimer et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6633254 | Sutphin | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6656136 | Weng et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6868073 | Carrender | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7045996 | Lyon | May 2006 | B2 |
7079029 | Tsuji | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7119737 | Tsuji | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7228228 | Bartlett et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265675 | Carrender | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7304571 | Halsey et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7421321 | Breed et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7451647 | Matsuhisa et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468691 | Yoshioka | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7574732 | Knox et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7580378 | Carrender et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7688255 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7839289 | Chung et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7884753 | Peczalski et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7903022 | Ohara et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7961147 | VanLaningham et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8040280 | Seong et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8279109 | Piesinger | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8300846 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20010020918 | Takai | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020097180 | Geisheimer et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020113709 | Helms | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126013 | Bridgelall | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030030568 | Lastinger et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030199286 | D du Toit | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040102937 | Ibrahim | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122662 | Crockett | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040257228 | Tsuji | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260506 | Jones et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050159891 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050206555 | Bridgelall | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237953 | Carrender | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259769 | Wang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060074893 | Snijder et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060166681 | Lohbihler | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060279641 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008069 | Lastinger et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013580 | Finch et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070064792 | Chiu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070247368 | Wu | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070285312 | Gao et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080018535 | Hwang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080074307 | Boric-Lubecke et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075037 | Guo et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079541 | Rofougaran | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080096517 | Appleyard | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080143482 | Shoarinejad | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143584 | Shoarinejad et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150699 | Ohara | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183082 | Farringdon et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198071 | Hwang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080218357 | March et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080316104 | Seong et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090135044 | Sutphin | May 2009 | A1 |
20090303006 | Eggers et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100039233 | Niedzwiecki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100090893 | Hoshizaki | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109903 | Carrick | May 2010 | A1 |
20100234044 | Lohbihler | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110032144 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110102154 | Hindhede | May 2011 | A1 |
20110102243 | Sai et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120182129 | Eggers et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120182129 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12134710 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 13432158 | US |